Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
The Acer ES Series 5 Select edges out as the more sensible overall choice for most everyday commuters: it rides softer, goes further in real life, and costs noticeably less while still feeling solid and safe. The Ducati PRO-III R, on the other hand, is the scooter you buy with your heart - gorgeous, torquey and nicely kitted out, but you pay a clear premium for style and a badge rather than raw capability.
Choose the Acer if you want painless daily transport, care about comfort and range, and prefer saving money over impressing the bike rack. Choose the Ducati if you ride mainly on smooth tarmac, value design and security features, and are okay paying extra for a more "special" object that's still fundamentally a 25 km/h city scooter. If you want to know where the Ducati really earns its price - and where it really doesn't - keep reading.
Electric scooters have reached that awkward age where your accountant brain and your gadget brain rarely agree. The Acer ES Series 5 Select is the accountant's pick: practical, feature-complete, and keenly priced. The Ducati PRO-III R is the gadget brain's crush: magnesium frame, fat display, NFC key, and that unmistakable logo shouting "I'm not a rental scooter".
I've put decent kilometres on both: commuter runs, bad bike paths, the usual "let's see what happens if I ignore this detour sign" explorations. One is clearly built to get you to work with minimum drama; the other is built to make you feel slightly cooler doing it - and occasionally reminds you of the compromises behind the looks.
If you're torn between wallet and heart, comfort and style, this comparison will walk you through where each scooter shines, stumbles, and who should actually buy which. Spoiler: the answer isn't the same for your head and for your Instagram feed.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
On paper, the Acer ES Series 5 Select and Ducati PRO-III R live in the same broad "serious urban commuter" class: single-motor, legal city speeds, decent batteries, proper lights and brakes, and price tags that make you think twice but not take out a second mortgage.
The Acer plays in the upper mid-budget bracket. It's aimed squarely at students and office commuters who want something nicer than a barebones rental clone but don't want to slide into "I could've bought a used motorbike" territory. It's all about range, comfort, and low-maintenance ownership.
The Ducati is firmly "premium mid-range". Same use case on paper - daily urban commuting - but wrapped in a much more aspirational package. You're paying extra for the magnesium frame, big display, NFC key, and of course that Ducati styling. Realistically, these two end up on the same shortlist because their spec sheets overlap heavily - but their priorities, and what you get for your money, are quite different.
Design & Build Quality
Put them side by side and it's obvious they weren't designed in the same room.
The Acer is understated: matte black, some quiet techy accents, clean internal cable routing. It looks like something that would roll out of a laptop company - in a good way. Very tidy, nothing screams for attention, and it fits seamlessly in an office lobby. Frame construction feels solid enough, with no alarming flex or creaks even after a couple of weeks of pothole diplomacy.
The Ducati is pure brand theatre. The magnesium frame allows more sculpted lines than the Acer's more conventional aluminium tubing. You get that "this is a designed object" vibe instead of "this is a vehicle assembled from catalogue parts". The paint, logos and little Italian flag touches are genuinely well executed, and the big dashboard makes the cockpit feel more like a tiny EV than a gadget.
In the hand, the Ducati's frame itself feels a notch more premium - stiffer and lighter - but then you start noticing the trade-offs: some plastic controls and fenders that don't quite match the frame's quality, especially at this price. The Acer, paradoxically, feels more consistent: nothing is exotic, but nothing is wildly out of place either. It's a coherent, honest build, if not an inspiring one.
Ergonomically, both get the basics right: decent bar width, sensible controls, clear displays. The Ducati's display wins on size and visibility; the Acer's is simpler but perfectly readable in most conditions. If design flair matters to you, the Ducati walks this section. If you just want something that doesn't draw attention and feels sensibly screwed together, the Acer does the job quietly.
Ride Comfort & Handling
Here the Acer lands its first big punch: rear suspension. Combine that with larger wheels and you get a noticeably more forgiving ride on broken city surfaces. After a few kilometres of dodgy paving stones, the Acer leaves your knees merely mildly annoyed instead of filing formal complaints.
The caveat: the Acer relies on puncture-proof tyres. Solid or foam-filled rubber is fantastic for avoiding flats, but usually translates to "every seam in the tarmac goes straight into your spine". The rear shock compensates better than you'd expect: the back end feels surprisingly civilised, though the front can still chatter over sharp edges. On really rough stretches, you do end up weight-shifting and using your legs as extra suspension, but that's par for the class.
The Ducati goes the other way: no suspension at all, but proper tubeless pneumatic tyres. On fresh asphalt or good bike lanes, the ride is actually very pleasant - taut, precise, almost sporty. You feel directly connected to the surface, which is great in corners. Start hitting cracked paths, manhole covers and lazy road works, and the story changes. You feel everything. After a longer stint on patchy surfaces, I found myself planning routes more carefully than on the Acer, just to avoid having my ankles reintroduced to medieval cobble design.
Handling-wise, both are stable at city speeds. The Ducati's stiffer frame and rear-wheel drive give it a slightly more "planted" feel in sweeping turns, and it responds more eagerly when you weight-shift through corners. The Acer is more relaxed, a bit more commuter-ish in its steering: it goes where you point it, doesn't surprise you, and that's what most riders actually want at 25 km/h.
If your daily ride includes a fair amount of rough surfaces, the Acer's basic suspension plus solid tyres is the more forgiving compromise. If your city has smooth infrastructure and you like a firm, connected feel, the Ducati's rigid-but-airtyre setup will feel sharper - at the cost of comfort on bad days.
Performance
Power delivery is where the Ducati finally lives up to the name - at least up to the legal ceiling.
The Acer's front motor is very typical of mid-tier commuters: smooth, linear, and totally fine for city traffic. It won't catapult you, but it gets you off the line briskly enough to keep up with bikes and casual e-bikes. The acceleration curve is gentle, almost conservative. Great for newer riders, slightly dull if you've ridden punchier machines.
The Ducati's 48 V rear motor has that bit of extra shove you feel immediately. It digs in from low speed with more authority, especially on inclines or when overtaking. You're still limited to standard city speeds, but getting there feels more effortless, and it holds its pace confidently even as the battery drains. Rear-wheel drive also helps on steep or slippery starts: the front end on the Acer can occasionally feel a touch light or skittish when you ask for full power out of a turn or on a damp surface.
On hills, the difference becomes more obvious. The Acer manages the usual city bridges and mild climbs without drama, but with a heavier rider on steeper grades it starts to look for excuses and you find yourself watching the speed drop. The Ducati simply has more torque in reserve. Steep ramps that make the Acer wheeze are handled with more dignity on the Italian side.
Braking on both is solid for their class: electronic plus mechanical rear disc in both cases, with decent modulation. The Ducati's regen tuning and KERS feel slightly more polished, blending the slowing effect more smoothly into mechanical braking. The Acer's setup is absolutely fine in everyday use and has a nicely progressive lever feel; it just doesn't have that extra layer of refinement the Ducati's controller manages.
If you're heavier, live in a hilly area, or just enjoy a bit more punch getting up to speed, the Ducati is the more satisfying performer. If your terrain is fairly flat and you don't care about "brisk versus very brisk" within the same legal limit, the Acer's calmer tuning is more than adequate.
Battery & Range
This is where the Acer quietly gets its revenge.
Acer stuck a generously sized battery in the ES Series 5 Select, and it shows. In mixed real-world riding - full speed on clear stretches, normal stop-and-go, average rider weight - you can realistically expect several commuting days out of a charge, even if you're not babying the throttle. You start to treat charging as a twice-a-week chore rather than a daily ritual. Range claims are, as always, optimistic, but the Acer comes closer to its brochure fantasy than many rivals.
The Ducati's battery is slightly smaller, and that shows too. On the same kind of riding - especially if you live in a hillier area and let the torquey motor do its thing - you're looking at noticeably shorter distance before the gauge makes you start doing mental maths. You can still manage a typical workday there-and-back without stress, but it's the Acer that gives you that relaxed "I can do an extra detour and still be fine" confidence.
Both take roughly an overnight session to refill from empty, which is hardly impressive in 2025 but workable. Plug in when you get home, ignore until morning. The Acer edges it slightly on charging speed relative to its larger battery, but in daily life you won't notice much unless you frequently run them low.
If you're the kind of rider who forgets to charge things and hates range anxiety, the Acer's bigger tank and efficient tune simply serve you better. The Ducati's range is acceptable, but given the price tag, "acceptable" feels a bit stingy.
Portability & Practicality
Both scooters live in that "portable, but not exactly a feather" category. You can carry them up a flight or two of stairs without starting a fitness blog, but you won't love doing it repeatedly.
The Ducati wins the numbers game slightly on weight and feels marginally easier to swing into a car boot. The magnesium frame helps keep things trim, and the folding mechanism is quick and nicely secure. Folded, it's compact enough for train aisles and storing behind an office door, and the balance point when carrying it by the stem feels well judged.
The Acer is a touch heavier and you do feel that when you're dragging it up a long staircase or lifting it regularly. The fold itself is simple and confidence-inspiring, stem latch feels robust, and the clip to lock stem to rear is straightforward. For multimodal commuting with lots of lifting, the Ducati's small weight advantage and more svelte frame give it the edge. For "fold it once in the morning, unfold it once in the evening" people, the difference is academic.
On the practicality front, both have apps with the usual cocktail of stats and mild connectivity grumbles from users. Acer adds nice commuter touches: a pedestrian mode that genuinely helps when you're walking it through crowds, and a very workmanlike approach to deck space and kickstand stability. Ducati counters with phone charging from the dashboard and the NFC ignition, which is very handy in day-to-day use - provided you don't leave the tag on yesterday's jeans.
Net effect: if carrying weight is your main concern, the Ducati nudges ahead. If "practical" to you means "as many everyday commuter boxes ticked for the least cost", the Acer's compromises make more sense.
Safety
Core braking hardware is similar on both, and both stop well within what their top speeds demand. Lever feel is predictable, and you don't get any unnerving dives or wobbles when you really haul on the brake in the dry.
Where things diverge is in passive safety and stability. The Acer's combination of larger wheels, rear suspension and a generally more forgiving chassis makes it more composed over nasty urban surprises. Hit a shallow pothole or a sunken manhole cover mid-corner and it shrugs it off better than the unsuspended Ducati, which can kick harder through the bars. That extra compliance gives the Acer a slight stability edge on genuinely bad surfaces, and that translates directly to real-world safety for a lot of riders.
Lighting is decent on both, with acceptable front beams and functional rear lights. Neither has a truly car-grade headlight, so I wouldn't choose either for high-speed night bombing on pitch-black paths, but for city visibility they're fine. Both also offer integrated turn signals - a massive safety upgrade that means you can indicate without sacrificing your grip.
Weather protection is marginally better on the Acer, which has a higher water-resistance rating. Neither is a submarine, but the Acer is a bit more reassuring if you get surprised by a nasty shower. On the security side, the Ducati's NFC key is the star - an excellent theft deterrent against ride-off theft and much more elegant than relying on an app every time.
If you ride often in mixed or wet conditions, the Acer's extra composure and water resistance make it the safer bet. If your main safety stress is theft rather than sliding, the Ducati's ignition system earns its keep.
Community Feedback
| ACER ES Series 5 Select | DUCATI PRO-III R |
|---|---|
What riders love
|
What riders love
|
What riders complain about
|
What riders complain about
|
Price & Value
This is the elephant in the room. The Acer sits safely in the "sensible purchase" bracket: you get a large battery, suspension, big-brand backing and the necessary safety gear for a price that, while not bargain-basement, feels justified. It's the kind of scooter where, after a month of commuting, you stop thinking about the price because it just quietly does the job.
The Ducati asks a hefty premium for what is, underneath the branding, still a single-motor urban scooter without suspension. You're paying more for less battery, no suspension and only a modest weight saving. What you get in return is better design, stronger performance, NFC security and brand appeal. For some riders, that equation is absolutely worth it. For others, it feels a bit like buying the designer version of something utilitarian - nice, but hard to defend if you're counting every euro.
If you're value-driven and want maximum utility and comfort per euro, the Acer is clearly the stronger proposition. The Ducati's value only makes sense if design, badge prestige and security features are high on your personal priority list.
Service & Parts Availability
Both scooters come from brands with real European distribution, which already puts them above the sea of mystery-label imports.
Acer leverages its well-established IT service network and regional partners. You're not dealing with a one-shop operation; there are proper channels, spare parts pipelines, and processes. It's not perfect, but it's reassuring, especially if this is your first scooter and you're nervous about support.
The Ducati is handled through Platum/MT Distribution, which is an experienced European player in e-mobility. They're not a back-alley brand either, and parts like tyres, brakes and controls are mostly standard fare. That said, proprietary elements like the frame, display and NFC system will tie you to official channels more than the Acer's relatively generic, laptop-maker mindset.
In practice, both are serviceable. Acer has the edge in sheer corporate footprint; Ducati has the edge in more "vehicle-industry-style" distribution. Neither is a terrible choice for long-term ownership, but if you want the simplest life in terms of generic spare parts and support reach, the Acer has a small but comfortable advantage.
Pros & Cons Summary
| ACER ES Series 5 Select | DUCATI PRO-III R |
|---|---|
Pros
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
Cons
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | ACER ES Series 5 Select | DUCATI PRO-III R |
|---|---|---|
| Motor power (rated) | 350 W front hub | 499 W rear hub |
| Top speed (limited) | Ca. 20-25 km/h (up to ~30 km/h where legal) | 25 km/h |
| Claimed range | Up to 60 km | Up to 55 km |
| Realistic range (mixed use) | Ca. 40-45 km | Ca. 35-40 km |
| Battery | 36 V, 15 Ah (ca. 540 Wh) | 48 V, 10,4 Ah (499 Wh) |
| Weight | 18,5 kg | 17,6 kg |
| Brakes | Front electronic + rear disc | Front electronic + rear disc, KERS |
| Suspension | Rear shock | None |
| Tyres | 10" puncture-proof (foam/solid) | 10" tubeless pneumatic |
| Max rider load | 100-120 kg (market-dependent) | 100 kg |
| IP rating | IPX5 | IPX4 |
| Approx. price | Ca. 478 € | Ca. 799 € |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
If you strip the logos off and pretend they're anonymous scooters, the Acer ES Series 5 Select comes out as the more complete daily tool. It goes further on a charge, rides more forgivingly on rough city surfaces, copes better with bad weather, and does all of that for much less money. It's not glamorous and it certainly won't impress hardcore enthusiasts, but as a commuter appliance it makes a very strong case for itself.
The Ducati PRO-III R is the one you buy because you care how your scooter looks leaning against the café window. It's quicker off the line, climbs hills better, feels more special to stand on, and the NFC key plus big display genuinely improve the day-to-day experience. But the lack of suspension, shorter range and significantly higher price mean you are consciously trading practicality for style and a bit of extra punch.
So, who gets what? If your route involves patched tarmac, cobbles, or year-round riding and your budget isn't infinite, the Acer is the rational choice and frankly the one I'd hand to most people asking "What should I actually buy?". If you have smooth bike lanes, a soft spot for Italian design, and are comfortable paying extra for a scooter that feels more like a lifestyle object than a tool, the Ducati will put a bigger grin on your face - just go into it with eyes open about what you're paying for.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | ACER ES Series 5 Select | DUCATI PRO-III R |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ✅ 0,89 €/Wh | ❌ 1,60 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ✅ 19,12 €/km/h | ❌ 31,96 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ✅ 34,26 g/Wh | ❌ 35,27 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | ❌ 0,74 kg/km/h | ✅ 0,70 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ✅ 11,25 €/km | ❌ 21,31 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ✅ 0,44 kg/km | ❌ 0,47 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ✅ 12,71 Wh/km | ❌ 13,31 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ❌ 14,00 W/km/h | ✅ 19,96 W/km/h |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | ❌ 0,053 kg/W | ✅ 0,035 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ✅ 67,50 W | ❌ 55,44 W |
These metrics give a numeric snapshot of efficiency and value. The Acer clearly wins on cost-effectiveness (price per Wh, per km and per hour of charge) and on how much range and energy efficiency you get for its mass. The Ducati, meanwhile, converts its weight into more usable power: it has better power density and stronger performance relative to its mass, at the cost of being less economical in almost every money-related metric.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | ACER ES Series 5 Select | DUCATI PRO-III R |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ❌ Slightly heavier to carry | ✅ Lighter, nicer to lift |
| Range | ✅ Clearly goes further | ❌ Shorter real-world range |
| Max Speed | ✅ Similar, sometimes unlockable | ❌ Locked, no extra headroom |
| Power | ❌ Adequate but modest | ✅ Noticeably stronger motor |
| Battery Size | ✅ Bigger energy tank | ❌ Smaller for class |
| Suspension | ✅ Rear shock saves knees | ❌ No suspension at all |
| Design | ❌ Clean but forgettable | ✅ Standout Italian styling |
| Safety | ✅ Better wet, more stable | ❌ Harsher, less forgiving |
| Practicality | ✅ Tool-like daily workhorse | ❌ Style over pure utility |
| Comfort | ✅ Softer, kinder on rough | ❌ Firm, tiring on bad roads |
| Features | ❌ Fewer "toys", basics covered | ✅ NFC, big screen, USB |
| Serviceability | ✅ More generic, easier parts | ❌ More proprietary bits |
| Customer Support | ✅ Big-brand service network | ❌ Narrower mobility network |
| Fun Factor | ❌ Sensible, not exciting | ✅ Punchier, sportier feel |
| Build Quality | ✅ Consistent, no big weak spots | ❌ Mixed plastics vs frame |
| Component Quality | ✅ Solid, coherent package | ❌ Some cheap-feeling details |
| Brand Name | ❌ Tech brand, less emotional | ✅ Strong, aspirational badge |
| Community | ✅ Quiet but positive owners | ❌ Smaller, more niche crowd |
| Lights (visibility) | ✅ Adequate, with indicators | ✅ Adequate, with indicators |
| Lights (illumination) | ❌ Just enough, nothing more | ✅ Slightly stronger beam |
| Acceleration | ❌ Gentle, commuter-grade | ✅ Noticeably snappier |
| Arrive with smile factor | ❌ Satisfying, not thrilling | ✅ Feels more special |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ✅ Less harsh, more chilled | ❌ Firm ride, more fatigue |
| Charging speed | ✅ Slightly faster per Wh | ❌ Slower for battery size |
| Reliability | ✅ Proven, no big red flags | ❌ More complex, pricier bits |
| Folded practicality | ❌ Heavier, bulk slightly bigger | ✅ Lighter, sleek when folded |
| Ease of transport | ❌ Manageable but hefty | ✅ Easier up stairs |
| Handling | ✅ Stable, forgiving steering | ❌ Sharper but more nervous |
| Braking performance | ✅ Strong, predictable stops | ✅ Strong, nice regen blend |
| Riding position | ✅ Neutral, comfy stance | ✅ Sporty but still natural |
| Handlebar quality | ❌ Functional, nothing fancy | ✅ Feels more premium |
| Throttle response | ❌ Soft, slightly dull | ✅ Crisp, engaging |
| Dashboard/Display | ❌ Small but usable | ✅ Large, bright, informative |
| Security (locking) | ❌ Standard app-lock only | ✅ NFC ignition is excellent |
| Weather protection | ✅ Better splash resistance | ❌ More cautious in rain |
| Resale value | ❌ Decent but unspectacular | ✅ Badge helps used prices |
| Tuning potential | ✅ More generic, hackable | ❌ Locked-down, brand-minded |
| Ease of maintenance | ✅ Simple, common components | ❌ Proprietary display, NFC |
| Value for Money | ✅ Strong spec for price | ❌ Paying brand premium |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the ACER ES Series 5 Select scores 7 points against the DUCATI PRO-III R's 3. In the Author's Category Battle, the ACER ES Series 5 Select gets 23 ✅ versus 19 ✅ for DUCATI PRO-III R (with a few ties sprinkled in).
Totals: ACER ES Series 5 Select scores 30, DUCATI PRO-III R scores 22.
Based on the scoring, the ACER ES Series 5 Select is our overall winner. For me as a rider, the Acer ES Series 5 Select is the one I'd actually live with: it might not raise my heart rate, but it quietly ticks more boxes and leaves more money in my pocket while doing it. The Ducati PRO-III R is the scooter I enjoy looking at and blasting up the occasional hill with, but I'd be thinking about its compromises every time the road surface turned ugly or the rain clouds rolled in. If you want a dependable companion that treats the daily grind with respect, the Acer is the more complete package. If you're willing to sacrifice some comfort and value for style, torque and a bit of red-badge theatre, the Ducati will still make you smile - just not always for purely rational reasons.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.

