Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
The Apollo Air 2022 edges out the Acer Predator Storm as the more rounded, grown-up commuter: it rides softer, feels more refined under your feet, and is backed by a stronger service ecosystem, even if it asks a painful chunk more from your wallet. The Predator Storm fights back with a larger battery, turn signals, and a noticeably lower price, making it tempting if you mainly care about range per euro and don't mind a slightly rougher, more generic-feeling ride. Choose the Apollo if comfort, polish and long-term ownership matter; choose the Acer if you want maximum distance and features for the money and can live with a heavier, less sophisticated package. Both will get you to work; only one feels like it was designed by people who commute on scooters every single day.
Stick around for the full breakdown - the devil, as always, is in the riding experience.
Electric scooters have matured past the "toy phase", but a lot of mid-range models still feel like they were spec'd by accountants rather than riders. The Acer Predator Storm and Apollo Air 2022 sit right in that murky middle: single-motor commuters with decent power, sensible top speeds and just enough tech sparkle to justify their price tags.
I've put real kilometres on both - enough kerb drops, wet mornings and rushed commutes to see where the marketing ends and the compromises begin. On paper they look similar; in practice they have very different personalities. The Predator Storm is the "big battery and gamer cosmetics" approach, while the Apollo Air 2022 goes for "comfort, refinement and don't-rattle-apart-in-a-year".
If you're torn between them, this comparison will walk you through the actual trade-offs: from knees and nerves on bad tarmac, to how they behave when you're late, it's raining, and you still have a few stairs between you and a hot shower.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
Both scooters live in the mid-power commuter class: single front motors strong enough to keep pace with city traffic, tyres big enough not to die in the first pothole, and price tags that will make you think twice, but not take out a loan. They are aimed at riders who've outgrown rental scooters and gimmicky toys and want something that feels like a real, daily vehicle.
The Predator Storm is the "spec-first" option: big battery, solid power, app, indicators, beefy frame - and a price that belongs firmly in the mid-tier bracket. The Apollo Air 2022, priced like a "premium commuter", sells you on ride quality, build refinement and brand ecosystem rather than raw stats.
They compete for the same rider: someone doing a decent-length urban or suburban commute, mostly on streets and cycle lanes, with the occasional rough pavement and a few mild hills. If you can only buy one scooter to get you through the work week, these two are absolutely trying to be that one - just via different philosophies.
Design & Build Quality
Park them side by side and you immediately see the difference in design language. The Acer Predator Storm leans heavily into the "Predator" gaming aesthetic: matte black, angular lines, and a general "my owner probably owns a mechanical keyboard" vibe. It looks purposeful enough, but also a bit like a standard Chinese commuter frame that's been dressed up for LAN party cosplay.
The Apollo Air 2022, on the other hand, goes full tech-minimalist. The frame looks like a single casting, cables are tucked away, and nothing screams "parts bin special". Where the Acer looks like a scooter with components bolted on, the Apollo feels like one coherent object. In your hands, that translates to fewer rattles, less visible hardware, and a general impression that more engineering hours were spent on the chassis instead of the spec sheet.
In terms of perceived solidity, both are better than rental-level junk, but the Air feels more "monolithic". The stem on the Apollo is thick and reassuring, with a redesigned latch that practically eliminates play once locked. The Acer's folding joint is rugged and good enough for daily use, but you do feel more conventional scooter DNA in the way the stem and deck meet - it's solid, just not special.
Where the Acer does win a few style points is in practical touches: integrated turn signals, a clear standalone display, and a very conventional cockpit layout that most riders can understand in a second. The Apollo cockpit feels a step more premium, but a bit busier with dual thumb controls and a more integrated display. Small differences - but you notice them daily.
Ride Comfort & Handling
This is where the Apollo earns its price tag. On bad city surfaces, the Air 2022 simply feels kinder to your body. The combination of proper front dual-fork suspension and large air-filled tyres smooths out the endless micro-bumps of urban life. I've done several "after-work, already tired" rides on it and arrived home without my wrists silently filing a complaint.
The Predator Storm isn't awful - far from it. Its front spring and big tubeless tyres take the edge off typical cracks and small potholes. But when you hit a series of broken slabs or cobbles, you start to feel that the suspension is more "there because marketing required the word" than fully dialled in. The front fork moves, but it's not as controlled or plush as the Apollo's; the rear relies solely on tyre flex. After a few kilometres of truly rough pavement, the Acer has you consciously dodging impacts the Apollo would just shrug off.
Handling-wise, the Apollo's wider handlebars and well-sorted geometry make it extremely stable, especially near its top speed. It tracks through long bends with that "rail" feeling - you set an angle and it holds it. The Storm is also stable, but the narrower cockpit and slightly less refined damping give it a more nervous edge over choppy surfaces. Not alarming, but you do need to pay more attention with your weight shifts.
In tight manoeuvres - weaving through pedestrians or threading bollards - both are agile enough. The Apollo's smooth throttle and planted front end just make these slow-speed moments feel more composed, where the Acer can feel a bit more "bouncy scooter" if the pavement is poor.
Performance
On paper, both scooters share similar motor ratings, and on the street they deliver surprisingly close real-world punch. Neither rips your arms off, and neither is a slug. Off the line, the difference comes down more to throttle tuning than raw grunt.
The Apollo Air 2022 has that very city-friendly character: power comes in smoothly, builds progressively, and gives you enough urgency to jump away from the lights and keep up with urban traffic without any drama. You always feel in control, even when you slam the thumb down in a panic because a taxi driver remembered their indicator exists.
The Predator Storm actually feels a tad more eager in its sportiest mode, especially when the battery is fresh. It has that "slightly more childish grin" factor in short sprints - a little extra snap when you roll on from low speed. But its throttle mapping is less refined; there's a bit more on/off personality compared with the Apollo's polished curve. Perfectly manageable, just less elegant.
At higher speeds, both sit in the same ballpark: fast enough for typical European-style commuting, but not in the "better start wearing motorcycle armour" category. The Storm can feel a little more lively when pushed, while the Air feels more planted. If you like a bit of buzz, the Acer is fine; if you want to forget about the scooter and just flow, the Apollo does that better.
On hills, they behave like you'd expect from mid-power single motors. Normal city inclines are handled without embarrassing slowdowns, moderate hills remain usable, and really steep ramps will expose both as commuters, not hill-climb champions. If you're heavy, the Acer's slightly punchier feeling and bigger battery reserve help keep speeds less depressed late in the charge, but the difference is evolutionary, not revolutionary.
Braking performance is solid on both, but with very different approaches. The Acer's mechanical disc plus electronic rear brake gives you strong bite and that reassuring "grab" at the lever, though you can provoke some rear-wheel lightness if you panic-brake on slick surfaces. The Apollo's drum plus sophisticated regen setup is more progressive and less noisy in daily use. Stopping distances are competitive; the Air simply makes it easier to modulate and live with long-term, while the Acer leans slightly more towards outright mechanical bite.
Battery & Range
If pure battery size is your religion, the Acer Predator Storm is your church. Its pack is visibly larger and, unsurprisingly, it will carry you further on a charge in like-for-like riding. Lazy full-speed commuting, moderate hills, heavier rider - the Storm holds its own and usually finishes the day with a more generous buffer.
The Apollo Air 2022 isn't stingy, though. Its battery is respectably sized for a commuter and will comfortably cover a typical there-and-back urban day for most riders without any charger anxiety. But start chaining long detours and hillier routes and you'll notice the Acer's advantage. Range claims from both brands are optimistic in brochure conditions; in the real world, the Storm simply gives you more leeway.
Where the Apollo hits back is efficiency. In sensible riding, it sips energy more politely, helped by its refined motor control and slightly lighter build. If you cruise instead of hammering, the Air's range creeps closer to the Acer despite the smaller battery. But few people buy scooters to ride constantly in eco mode, and when you just mash sport and go, the Acer walks away in distance.
Charging is another small divide: both are firmly in the "overnight or full workday" camp. The Air takes a bit longer to refill its smaller battery than the Acer does to top up its bigger one, which says something about the Acer's slightly brisker charging relative to capacity. Neither is fast-charging royalty, but the Predator Storm does get you back to full a little more promptly in proportion to what it stores.
Portability & Practicality
Let's be honest: neither of these is a "throw over the shoulder and jog for a tram" scooter. They both sit in that awkward middle where you can carry them, but you're not happy about it. The Predator Storm is the chunkier of the two - when you pick it up, you immediately feel the extra kilos from that big battery and chunky frame. One flight of stairs? Fine. Several floors daily? Your gym membership may become redundant, but not in a pleasant way.
The Apollo Air 2022 is lighter, but not enough to justify its "Air" name. It's more manageable for short carries and quick lifts into a boot, but it's still firmly a two-hands-and-a-sigh proposition. The real practicality hit is its wide fixed handlebars, which make it awkward in narrow hallways, lifts, and packed trains. The Acer, with its more compact folded footprint, is actually easier to stash under desks or in cramped storage spots, even though it's heavier.
Both folding mechanisms are secure. The Air's latch is robust but low and can be stiff, making you bend down and wrestle with it - you get zero wobble as a reward. The Acer's hinge is more traditional and a bit easier to operate, at the cost of a shade more "standard scooter" feel at the joint. If you fold and unfold several times a day, the Acer's ergonomics are less annoying in practice, even if the Apollo wins the no-play contest.
Water protection is adequate on both for normal rain - neither is meant to be used as a jet-ski, but you won't have a panic attack if you ride home in a shower. The Acer's slightly stronger rating gives it a modest edge for wetter climates; the Apollo's is still acceptable for usual drizzle and damp streets.
Safety
Safety is a mix of how fast you stop, how well you see and are seen, and how stable the scooter feels when something unexpected happens.
On braking, both are reassuring, with different philosophies. The Acer's disc plus electronic rear brake gives punchy initial response and good overall stopping power - it feels familiar if you come from bicycles. The Apollo's drum plus regen system is calmer and cleaner: no exposed rotor, less affected by grime, and a very usable electronic brake that can handle much of your speed control in daily riding. For pure peace of mind in foul weather, the Air's sealed drum is hard to beat; for outright mechanical force, the Acer's disc has the edge.
Lighting is where Acer scores a clear feature win thanks to integrated turn signals. Being able to indicate without flapping your arm out like a confused pigeon is a genuine safety upgrade in mixed traffic. Headlights on both are... fine, as long as you stay in lit urban areas. On unlit paths at speed, I'd strongly recommend putting your own light on the bar no matter which you choose.
Stability at speed and over rough patches favours the Apollo. When you hit an unexpected patch of broken asphalt mid-corner, the Air's suspension and wide bar give you a bigger window to correct without drama. The Acer stays composed enough, but you feel closer to the limit of what the hardware can gracefully absorb.
Community Feedback
| Acer Predator Storm | Apollo Air 2022 |
|---|---|
| What riders love | What riders love |
|
Big battery and strong real-world range; solid, rattle-free frame; turn indicators and water resistance; decent hill performance for a commuter; app with customisation options; value feeling strong for the price. |
Exceptionally smooth, "gliding" ride; premium-feeling one-piece frame; stable handling at full speed; refined regen braking and low maintenance; clean, modern aesthetics; app tuning for acceleration and braking. |
| What riders complain about | What riders complain about |
|
Heavy to carry up stairs; worries about long-term parts availability; app pairing glitches now and then; regional speed limits frustrating power users; headlight could be brighter; kickstand and charge port placement niggles. |
Heavier than the name suggests; folding latch stiff and awkwardly low; stock headlight weak for dark lanes; wide bars awkward in tight spaces; fiddly valve stems; noticeable power drop as battery empties. |
Price & Value
Here's the uncomfortable truth: if you view scooters as "spec-per-euro machines", the Predator Storm looks like the more rational choice. Bigger battery, decent power, suspension, turn signals, water resistance, app - at its mid-range price, it undercuts the Apollo significantly while giving you hard numbers that look very competitive.
The Apollo Air 2022 sits in a noticeably higher bracket. If you ignore how it rides and just read a spreadsheet, it can look overpriced: smaller battery, similar motor power, no indicators. But that view ignores the refinement you feel every minute you're actually on it - the chassis stiffness, the ride comfort, the cleaner engineering, and the stronger brand ecosystem. You are absolutely paying for polish here, not just watts and watt-hours.
If your budget is tight and you mainly want range and "good enough" everything else, the Acer is the obvious economic pick. If you can stretch, the Apollo justifies its premium not by going faster or further, but by making all those kilometres more pleasant and likely less troublesome long-term.
Service & Parts Availability
This is where things get interesting. Acer is a huge electronics brand with proper distribution channels, but they're still relatively fresh in the mobility space. That means you may have easier access to initial warranty service through big-box retailers, but long-term availability of specific scooter parts - unique plastics, connectors, proprietary bits - is more of an open question. There isn't yet a decade of scooter-specific infrastructure behind them.
Apollo, by contrast, is a scooter company first. They've built a business around stocking spares, offering structured support, and maintaining an engaged user base that documents fixes and tweaks. In Europe you're often dealing with partners and importers rather than Apollo directly, but the ecosystem is there: guides, community support, known failure patterns, and so on.
If you like to tinker and don't mind occasionally hunting for compatible generic parts, the Acer's relative newness isn't a deal-breaker. If you want smoother access to brand-specific components and established scooter-centric support, the Apollo ecosystem is the safer long-term bet.
Pros & Cons Summary
| Acer Predator Storm | Apollo Air 2022 |
|---|---|
Pros
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
Cons
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | Acer Predator Storm | Apollo Air 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Motor power (rated) | 500 W | 500 W |
| Top speed (unlocked) | ca. 35 km/h | ca. 35 km/h |
| Advertised range | ca. 60 km | ca. 50 km |
| Realistic range (mixed use) | ca. 40 km | ca. 33 km |
| Battery capacity | ca. 576 Wh (16 Ah, 36 V) | 540 Wh (15 Ah, 36 V) |
| Weight | 20,5 kg | 17,6 kg |
| Max rider load | 120 kg | 100-120 kg |
| Brakes | Front disc + rear eABS | Front drum + rear regen |
| Suspension | Front spring, rear rigid | Front dual-fork, rear rigid |
| Tyres | 10" tubeless pneumatic | 10" pneumatic with tubes |
| Water resistance | IPX5 | IP54 |
| Charging time | ca. 6 h | ca. 8 h |
| Price (typical street) | ca. 629 € | ca. 919 € |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
If you strip the marketing away and look at how they behave day in, day out, the Apollo Air 2022 is the better scooter for most riders who treat their scooter as a primary urban vehicle. It rides more comfortably, feels more solid at speed, and gives you that subtle sense of polish you only miss when it's not there - fewer rattles, nicer controls, a frame that feels like one piece of metal rather than a kit of parts bolted together.
The Acer Predator Storm, though, has a very clear and legitimate appeal: you get a larger battery, useful safety features like turn indicators, decent performance and water resistance, all for notably less money. If your commute is longer, your budget is tighter, and your main priorities are range and features-per-euro rather than ride finesse, the Storm makes a rational, if slightly unspectacular, choice.
Personally, if I'm doing regular city kilometres on mixed surfaces and want to actually enjoy the ride rather than just endure it, I'd pick the Apollo Air 2022 and swallow the higher price. If I were buying for someone who just wants "a solid scooter that goes far and doesn't cost a fortune", I'd point them at the Predator Storm with a small caveat: it's good, but not quite as grown-up in feel as its Canadian rival.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | Acer Predator Storm | Apollo Air 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ✅ 1,09 €/Wh | ❌ 1,70 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ✅ 17,97 €/km/h | ❌ 26,26 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ❌ 35,59 g/Wh | ✅ 32,59 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | ❌ 0,59 kg/km/h | ✅ 0,50 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ✅ 15,73 €/km | ❌ 27,85 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ✅ 0,51 kg/km | ❌ 0,53 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ✅ 14,40 Wh/km | ❌ 16,36 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ✅ 14,29 W/km/h | ✅ 14,29 W/km/h |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | ❌ 0,0410 kg/W | ✅ 0,0352 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ✅ 96,00 W | ❌ 67,50 W |
These metrics show how much you pay and carry for each unit of performance or energy: price per Wh and per km tell you how cost-effective the battery and range are; weight-related ratios show how heavy the scooter is for what it offers; Wh per km reflects energy efficiency; power-to-speed hints at how well the motor supports its top speed; weight-to-power shows how much mass each watt must move; and average charging speed indicates how quickly the battery is refilled relative to its size.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | Acer Predator Storm | Apollo Air 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ❌ Noticeably heavier to lug | ✅ Lighter, less effort |
| Range | ✅ Bigger pack, goes further | ❌ Shorter real-world range |
| Max Speed | ✅ Similar, region unlocks | ✅ Similar, legally friendly |
| Power | ✅ Slightly punchier feel | ❌ Smooth but not stronger |
| Battery Size | ✅ Larger capacity pack | ❌ Smaller, mid-class pack |
| Suspension | ❌ Basic front, rear rigid | ✅ Better front dual fork |
| Design | ❌ Gamer-ish, a bit generic | ✅ Clean, integrated aesthetics |
| Safety | ✅ Indicators, good braking | ❌ No indicators, just solid |
| Practicality | ✅ Easier folded footprint | ❌ Wide bar, awkward folded |
| Comfort | ❌ Harsher on bad roads | ✅ Plush, fatigue-reducing |
| Features | ✅ Indicators, app, big battery | ❌ Fewer standout extras |
| Serviceability | ❌ New brand, parts question | ✅ Better documented platform |
| Customer Support | ❌ Generic electronics channels | ✅ Scooter-focused support |
| Fun Factor | ✅ Punchy, gamer vibe | ❌ More sensible than thrilling |
| Build Quality | ❌ Good, but not refined | ✅ Feels more premium |
| Component Quality | ❌ Decent mid-tier parts | ✅ Better chosen components |
| Brand Name | ❌ New to scooters | ✅ Established scooter brand |
| Community | ❌ Smaller, less active | ✅ Big, engaged user base |
| Lights (visibility) | ✅ Indicators, decent package | ❌ Lacks integrated signals |
| Lights (illumination) | ❌ Headlight just adequate | ❌ Also needs auxiliary light |
| Acceleration | ✅ Sharper, more eager | ❌ Smooth but milder |
| Arrive with smile factor | ❌ Functional, slightly bland | ✅ Comfort makes commuting nicer |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ❌ More vibration, more fatigue | ✅ Much calmer on rough |
| Charging speed | ✅ Faster relative to size | ❌ Slower refill overall |
| Reliability | ❌ Less proven scooter line | ✅ Track record, known issues |
| Folded practicality | ✅ Compact folded dimensions | ❌ Wide, awkward to stash |
| Ease of transport | ❌ Heavier to carry | ✅ Lighter, though still hefty |
| Handling | ❌ Less stable when pushed | ✅ Very composed, planted |
| Braking performance | ✅ Strong disc plus eABS | ❌ Adequate, more progressive |
| Riding position | ❌ Standard, nothing special | ✅ Ergonomic, roomy deck |
| Handlebar quality | ❌ Functional but basic | ✅ Wide, premium feeling |
| Throttle response | ❌ Cruder on/off feeling | ✅ Smooth, linear control |
| Dashboard / Display | ✅ Clear, conventional screen | ❌ Integrated, but less standout |
| Security (locking) | ✅ App lock, basic deterrent | ✅ App functions, similar level |
| Weather protection | ✅ Slightly stronger rating | ❌ Adequate but not as high |
| Resale value | ❌ Brand less sought-after used | ✅ Stronger demand second-hand |
| Tuning potential | ✅ Higher speed, big battery | ❌ Less headroom to tweak |
| Ease of maintenance | ❌ Parts and guides scarcer | ✅ Docs, guides, known fixes |
| Value for Money | ✅ Strong specs for price | ❌ Pricier for what you get |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the ACER Predator Storm scores 7 points against the APOLLO Air 2022's 4. In the Author's Category Battle, the ACER Predator Storm gets 18 ✅ versus 22 ✅ for APOLLO Air 2022.
Totals: ACER Predator Storm scores 25, APOLLO Air 2022 scores 26.
Based on the scoring, the APOLLO Air 2022 is our overall winner. Between these two, the Apollo Air 2022 is the scooter I'd rather live with: it feels calmer, more cohesive and simply more adult on real streets, even if my bank account sighs every time I say that out loud. The Acer Predator Storm does an honest job for less money and will absolutely suit riders who just want range and a decent blast to work, but it never quite escapes the feeling of being a well-spec'd "good enough" commuter rather than something you grow genuinely fond of. If you ride every day and care about how those kilometres feel, the Apollo is the one that quietly wins you over; if you mainly care about stretching each euro and each charge as far as possible, the Acer will do the job without much drama.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.