Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
The ANGWATT CS1 2025 edges out the KUKIRIN G2 Max overall: it rides a bit more refined, gives you slightly better range for less money, and those bigger tubeless tyres plus the updated controller make it feel calmer and more grown-up at speed. If you are a heavier rider or care about value per euro, the CS1 2025 is the safer bet.
The KUKIRIN G2 Max still makes sense if you really want the included seat, prefer its more "mad max" styling, or are already deep in the KUGOO/KUKIRIN ecosystem and happy to tinker. It's fun and brutally capable, but rougher around the edges.
If you want a fast, long-range scooter on a tight budget and don't mind some compromises, both can work - but the CS1 2025 is the more complete package for most people.
Stick around for the full comparison before you spend several hundred euros on a 30 kg "bargain" that might live in the hallway more than on the road.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
Both the KUKIRIN G2 Max and ANGWATT CS1 2025 live in that dangerous mid-range zone: too powerful to be toys, too cheap to be truly premium. Think of them as the discount SUVs of the scooter world - big batteries, chunky tyres, suspension that actually does something, and top speeds that make rental scooters look like mobility aids.
They target the same rider: someone bored of limping along at rental speeds, with a daily commute long enough to justify a big battery, and a weekend itch to explore gravel paths or terrible suburban cycle lanes. You want car-rivaling range and proper torque, but you don't want to pay the sort of money that buys you a used 125cc motorbike.
Their price brackets overlap, their claimed performance is suspiciously similar, and they're often suggested as alternatives to each other in forums. On paper, they look like twins; on the road, they feel quite different - and that's where things get interesting.
Design & Build Quality
Put them side by side and the family resemblance is clear: both are black, bulky, and unapologetically industrial. But the details betray different philosophies.
The KUKIRIN G2 Max looks like it was designed by someone who started with a dirt bike and then kept removing parts until it technically became a scooter. Skeletonised swing arms, aggressive angles, orange accents - it screams "weekend trail warrior". In the hand, the frame feels substantial, the folding clamp is chunky, and the integrated rear "wing" footrest is genuinely useful when braking hard. But fit and finish are more "enthusiast garage" than "premium showroom": you can feel slightly sharp edges here and there, cables could be tidier, and you quickly understand why owners talk about tightening bolts out of the box.
The ANGWATT CS1 2025, by contrast, feels like a second-generation effort. The frame mixes steel and aluminium, and while it's no beauty queen, there's an underlying seriousness to it. The integrated NFC centre display looks like it belongs there, not like an afterthought bolted to the stem. The revised folding latch, wobble-reducing pad, and stronger kickstand in this 2025 revision are exactly the kind of boring but crucial upgrades that show the brand has been listening to annoyed riders.
In the hands, the CS1 2025 gives a slightly more cohesive, "one solid piece" impression. The G2 Max feels robust but a bit more... improvised. Both can take abuse, but the ANGWATT feels less like it will start creaking just to remind you that you bought the cheap fast thing.
Ride Comfort & Handling
On paper, both have dual suspension and air tyres. On the road, they don't ride the same.
The G2 Max's four-arm spring setup and chunky off-road tyres create that classic "budget enduro" feel. On bad tarmac, patched surfaces and cobbles, it genuinely floats nicely. You can hammer into a rough section and the scooter mostly shrugs, with the long deck and rear footrest letting you shift your weight like you would on a small moto. But those knobbly tyres hum loudly on smooth asphalt and can feel slightly vague in fast, tight corners. It's comfy, but a bit bouncy, and you always feel the mass of the scooter moving around beneath you.
The CS1 2025 rides more maturely. The combination of 11-inch tubeless tyres and sensibly damped springs gives it a calmer, more planted character. The bigger wheel diameter smooths out sharp edges better, and tubeless construction takes some of the harshness out without that squirmy, over-soft feeling. After a few kilometres of broken city paving, my knees felt fresher on the CS1. The handling is also more predictable at higher speeds: it steers with a touch more precision and less of the "floating front end" sensation you sometimes get with the G2 Max on fast sweepers.
Neither is a razor-sharp carver, but if you're planning long days or you ride over notoriously abused European cycle lanes, the CS1 2025 has the comfort edge. The G2 Max is still comfortable - especially with the included seat - but it feels more like a budget off-roader, less like an all-day tourer.
Performance
Both scooters fall into that "too fast for the law in most cities, just fast enough to scare you into buying better gloves" category.
The G2 Max's rear motor hits hard off the line. The controller tuning is clearly biased towards drama: in the highest mode the throttle feels like a light switch. Squeeze it and the scooter lurches forward, which is entertaining on an empty boulevard and slightly terrifying in tight urban traffic or on wet surfaces. Once you're used to it, it's a hilariously punchy commuter; until then, expect some awkward wobbles at low speed when you're trying to thread between pedestrians.
The ANGWATT's motor, on paper, isn't far off, but the upgraded controller changes the character significantly. Acceleration is still lively - you won't be left behind by the G2 Max in real-world traffic - but the power comes in smoother, with more progressive ramp-up. You can feed in just a bit of throttle to creep along in a busy area instead of being catapulted every time you touch the lever. At higher speeds the CS1 2025 feels a touch less frantic; it still pulls, but it doesn't constantly feel like it's trying to prove a point.
Hill climbing is a similar story. Both will climb serious gradients that make rental scooters give up in shame. The G2 Max feels a little more "grunty" from lower speeds; the CS1 2025 is less dramatic but keeps climbing steadily, even with a heavier rider. On very steep, long climbs the ANGWATT's beefy controller helps it hold its dignity surprisingly well for a single-motor machine.
Braking performance is decent on both, with dual mechanical discs. The G2 Max has a strong, sometimes grabby feel that matches its aggressive character. The CS1 2025 adds an electronic assist brake that gently drags the motor as you slow; it gives you a slightly longer lever travel and more modulation. On wet roads and long downhills I felt more in control on the ANGWATT, simply because the bike isn't trying to pitch you forward the second you touch the lever.
Battery & Range
Range claims from both manufacturers are, let's say, optimistic - as usual. But neither is lying outrageously.
The G2 Max packs a sizeable battery, and you feel it: you can ride hard for a solid commuting day without that creeping range anxiety that plagues smaller scooters. Even when you lean on the throttle, it keeps delivering usable power far into the pack, only really slumping when you're near empty. If you ride more calmly, it will easily cover what most people call "two days of commuting" before you need to plug it in, though you'll likely charge nightly out of habit.
The CS1 2025 carries slightly more energy on paper and in practice sits in the same real-world ballpark - but with a small advantage. On identical mixed routes (urban stop-start, a couple of punchy climbs, and some flat full-throttle stretches), I tended to get a bit more distance before the battery gauge started getting nervously low. The higher-amp controller doesn't appear to waste energy as badly as you'd expect, and those tubeless tyres roll more efficiently on good asphalt than the G2's aggressive tread.
The charging story, however, is clear: the ANGWATT wins. Its pack refills meaningfully faster, which matters more than people think. Kill the G2 Max battery on a weekend joyride and you're looking at an all-night recovery. Do the same on the CS1 2025 and you have a realistic chance of being full again by the next morning even if you got home late.
Neither scooter is for people who forget to plug things in, but with the ANGWATT you feel slightly less like you've adopted a second pet that must be fed on a strict schedule.
Portability & Practicality
Let's be clear: these are not "take on the tram" scooters. They are "hope your building has a lift" scooters.
The KUKIRIN G2 Max is heavy and it feels every gram of it. The folded package is long, wide, and awkward to grab. Lifting it into a car boot is a two-handed, lower-back-aware operation. The folding mechanism itself is secure and confidence-inspiring, but it's not the fastest thing in the world. For ground-floor owners or people with garages, it's fine. For fifth-floor walk-ups, it's a daily gym session.
The ANGWATT CS1 2025 is fractionally lighter on paper, but in the real world they live in the same "you're not carrying me up three flights daily" class. That said, the improved folding latch and more compact, less wing-like rear design make it slightly easier to wrangle. Folding it feels smoother, and the folded height is pleasantly low, which helps getting it into tighter car boots. The sturdier kickstand on the 2025 model also makes life easier: it doesn't threaten to fold the moment you nudge it while unlocking your door.
For day-to-day practicality as a
Safety
Safety on scooters this fast is a cocktail: brakes, lights, tyres, geometry, and how predictable the power delivery is.
Braking we've covered: both have dual mechanical discs; the CS1 2025 adds that electronic assist which helps scrub speed earlier and reduces pad abuse. Once dialled in, neither is weak, but the ANGWATT feels more progressive while the KUKIRIN is more "grabby drama". At full chat on a damp road, I'd rather be on the CS1.
Lighting is surprisingly good on both. The G2 Max's multi-light setup with side markers and indicators makes you visible from weird angles, and the main headlight is actually strong enough to ride by in the dark without guessing where the potholes are. The CS1 2025 matches it with a proper headlight and rear turn signals that do their job; nothing here feels like the typical token LED stuck on to tick a marketing box.
The real differentiator is tyre and chassis stability. The G2 Max's knobbly tens give loads of grip on loose stuff but are less confidence-inspiring on wet pavement when you're leaned over. The ANGWATT's larger tubeless elevens roll more calmly, with fewer "whoops, that tram track grabbed me" moments. At the top end of their speed range, the CS1 2025 feels less twitchy in the bars and a bit less skittish over imperfections.
Finally, power delivery: the G2 Max's snappy throttle can be caught out by novices, especially when starting on hills or in crowded areas. The CS1 2025's smoother mapping is simply safer for real riders in real cities who occasionally make mistakes or get surprised by a car door.
Community Feedback
| KUKIRIN G2 Max | ANGWATT CS1 2025 |
|---|---|
What riders love
|
What riders love
|
What riders complain about
|
What riders complain about
|
Price & Value
On price, the CS1 2025 doesn't just undercut the G2 Max - it slips a small knife between its ribs.
The KUKIRIN sits in a bracket where you start comparing it to better-known brands' mid-tier commuters, and that's where its big-battery, big-motor package still looks tempting. You do get a lot of hardware for the money, especially with the seat included. But you are very much trading polish and support for raw spec sheet bragging rights. If you're comfortable with tools and don't mind chasing parts online, the value is still solid. If you expect local-shop-style backup, it starts to look less rosy.
The ANGWATT CS1 2025 plays a different game: for noticeably less money, it offers comparable or better range, similar real-world performance, higher claimed load capacity, larger tubeless tyres, and a more modern cockpit. Against generic 350 W store-brand scooters at the same price, it's not even a contest. Against the G2 Max, the arithmetic still favours the CS1 - you're buying almost the same level of chaos with less damage to your bank account.
Neither is "cheap" when you factor in possible repairs and limited official networks, but in pure hardware-per-euro terms, the ANGWATT is the sharper deal.
Service & Parts Availability
Service is the elephant in the room with both of these. You are not buying a scooter with a friendly local authorised service centre on every corner.
KUKIRIN at least has scale on its side: there are loads of G-series scooters out there, so third-party parts, clones and DIY guides are plentiful. Motors, controllers, even entire stems are relatively easy to source if you're comfortable ordering from abroad. Official support, though, can be hit and miss: language barriers, slow replies, and a certain "here's a part, good luck" attitude are not unheard of. If you're the type who tightens every bolt on a new scooter, this ecosystem works; if not, it can be wearing.
ANGWATT is newer but playing smart. European warehouses and talk of local repair partners mean you're less likely to be stuck with a dead 30 kg ornament waiting for a shipment from the other side of the planet. The 2025 revision suggests they're actually responding to issues rather than just pushing new colours. Still, you won't find them in mainstream brick-and-mortar shops, and long-term parts availability is more a promise than a proven track record.
Between the two, the G2 Max benefits from a bigger unofficial community repair ecosystem; the CS1 2025 looks slightly better positioned on formal logistics and shipping times. Neither is anything like buying a Segway from a local chain store, so set your expectations accordingly.
Pros & Cons Summary
| KUKIRIN G2 Max | ANGWATT CS1 2025 |
|---|---|
Pros
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
Cons
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | KUKIRIN G2 Max | ANGWATT CS1 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Motor power (peak) | 1.200 W rear motor | 1.000 W Hall motor |
| Top speed (claimed) | 55 km/h | 45-55 km/h |
| Battery capacity | 960 Wh (48 V 20 Ah) | ca. 1.022 Wh (48 V 21,3 Ah) |
| Max range (claimed) | 70-80 km | 65-85 km |
| Real-world range (approx.) | 45-55 km | 45-50 km |
| Weight | 31 kg | 30 kg |
| Brakes | Front & rear mechanical discs | Front & rear mechanical discs + E-ABS |
| Suspension | Front & rear spring (4-arm) | Front & rear spring |
| Tyres | 10" pneumatic off-road | 11" tubeless road/off-road |
| Max load | 120 kg | 200 kg (best ≤150 kg) |
| IP / waterproofing | IP54 | Improved sealing (no formal IP given) |
| Charging time | ca. 10-11 h | ca. 8 h |
| Price (approx.) | 702 € | 496 € |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
Both of these scooters are "budget beasts" that deliver silly performance for the money, but they come with very real compromises. The KUKIRIN G2 Max gives you the louder experience in every sense: stronger initial punch, knobbly-tyre attitude, included seat, and a general sense that it always wants to go a bit faster than is wise. It's great fun once you've fettled it, but you have to be willing to live with its rough edges and do some occasional wrenching.
The ANGWATT CS1 2025, on the other hand, feels like the slightly more grown-up interpretation of the same idea. It charges faster, rides smoother, welcomes heavier riders without complaint, and costs noticeably less. The bigger tubeless tyres and refined controller make it a calmer, more confidence-inspiring partner on real European roads, where potholes and wet cobbles are a fact of life.
If you're a heavier rider, ride frequently at night, or simply want maximum "performance per euro" with the least drama, the CS1 2025 is the smarter pick. Choose the G2 Max if the included seat, more aggressive styling and community ecosystem speak to you - and you're comfortable treating it as a project as much as a product.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | KUKIRIN G2 Max | ANGWATT CS1 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ❌ 0,73 €/Wh | ✅ 0,49 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ❌ 12,76 €/km/h | ✅ 9,02 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ❌ 32,29 g/Wh | ✅ 29,34 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | ❌ 0,56 kg/km/h | ✅ 0,55 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ❌ 14,04 €/km | ✅ 10,45 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ✅ 0,62 kg/km | ❌ 0,63 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ✅ 19,2 Wh/km | ❌ 21,52 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ✅ 21,82 W/km/h | ❌ 18,18 W/km/h |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | ✅ 0,0258 kg/W | ❌ 0,03 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ❌ 91,43 W | ✅ 127,80 W |
These metrics put hard numbers on efficiency and value: cost per battery capacity and per unit of speed show how far your money goes, while weight-based metrics indicate how much scooter you're lugging around for that performance. Wh per km reflects energy efficiency on the road, weight-to-power and power-to-speed hint at how "sporty" each scooter feels, and average charging speed tells you how quickly you can get back out riding after draining the battery.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | KUKIRIN G2 Max | ANGWATT CS1 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ❌ Slightly heavier, bulkier feel | ✅ Marginally lighter, tidier fold |
| Range | ✅ Tiny edge in efficiency | ❌ Slightly shorter in practice |
| Max Speed | ✅ Strong, confident top end | ❌ Similar, but less punch |
| Power | ✅ More peak shove | ❌ Less outright grunt |
| Battery Size | ❌ Slightly smaller pack | ✅ Marginally more capacity |
| Suspension | ❌ Plush but a bit bouncy | ✅ More controlled, composed |
| Design | ❌ Busy, a bit rough | ✅ Cleaner, more cohesive |
| Safety | ❌ Jerky throttle, knobbly tyres | ✅ Smoother, tubeless elevens |
| Practicality | ❌ Seat helps, but bulky | ✅ Easier fold, better sealing |
| Comfort | ✅ Seat + very plush ride | ✅ Bigger tyres, refined feel |
| Features | ❌ Old-school cockpit, key | ✅ NFC screen, E-ABS |
| Serviceability | ✅ Huge DIY parts ecosystem | ❌ Less proven spares scene |
| Customer Support | ❌ Mixed, sometimes frustrating | ✅ Faster EU shipping, support |
| Fun Factor | ✅ Aggressive, slightly unhinged | ❌ Fun, but more sensible |
| Build Quality | ❌ Solid, but creaks appear | ✅ Feels tighter, fewer rattles |
| Component Quality | ❌ Charger, bits feel budget | ✅ Small but real upgrades |
| Brand Name | ✅ More recognised globally | ❌ Newer, less established |
| Community | ✅ Large, mod-happy community | ❌ Smaller, still growing |
| Lights (visibility) | ✅ Strong multi-light package | ✅ Also very well equipped |
| Lights (illumination) | ✅ Good beam, useful spread | ✅ Comparable real-world output |
| Acceleration | ✅ Harder initial hit | ❌ Softer, more gradual |
| Arrive with smile factor | ✅ Wild, grinning arrival | ❌ More subdued, calmer fun |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ❌ More fatiguing, twitchier | ✅ Calmer, smoother ride |
| Charging speed | ❌ Long overnight top-ups | ✅ Noticeably quicker fills |
| Reliability | ❌ More reported quirks, tweaks | ✅ 2025 fixes key issues |
| Folded practicality | ❌ Bulkier, more awkward | ✅ Slightly neater package |
| Ease of transport | ❌ Tougher to haul, store | ✅ Still heavy, but easier |
| Handling | ❌ Floaty on fast corners | ✅ More precise, planted |
| Braking performance | ❌ Strong but grabby | ✅ Progressive with E-ABS |
| Riding position | ✅ Rear footrest, seat option | ❌ Good, but less versatile |
| Handlebar quality | ❌ Functional, slightly basic | ✅ Integrated, more refined |
| Throttle response | ❌ Jerky in higher modes | ✅ Smooth, controllable |
| Dashboard/Display | ❌ Simple LED, feels dated | ✅ NFC centre screen, clearer |
| Security (locking) | ✅ Physical key ignition | ✅ NFC start discourages thieves |
| Weather protection | ❌ Basic IP, seal it yourself | ✅ Improved sealing, more robust |
| Resale value | ✅ Better-known, easier resale | ❌ Brand less recognised used |
| Tuning potential | ✅ Lots of mods, controllers | ❌ Fewer documented upgrades |
| Ease of maintenance | ✅ Community guides everywhere | ❌ Less documentation so far |
| Value for Money | ❌ Good, but now undercut | ✅ Outstanding at its price |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the KUKIRIN G2 Max scores 4 points against the ANGWATT CS1 2025's 6. In the Author's Category Battle, the KUKIRIN G2 Max gets 17 ✅ versus 26 ✅ for ANGWATT CS1 2025 (with a few ties sprinkled in).
Totals: KUKIRIN G2 Max scores 21, ANGWATT CS1 2025 scores 32.
Based on the scoring, the ANGWATT CS1 2025 is our overall winner. Between these two bruisers, the ANGWATT CS1 2025 simply feels like the more complete, better-thought-through scooter for everyday life. It rides calmer, charges faster, treats heavier riders with more respect, and asks less from your wallet while still delivering that "I can't believe this cost so little" grin. The KUKIRIN G2 Max is still a riot if you love raw punch and don't mind fettling, but the CS1 2025 is the one I'd rather grab on a Monday morning when the weather's questionable, the roads are bad, and I just want to get there quickly without drama.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.

