Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
If your goal is simply cheap, practical urban transport, the AOVOPRO ES80 is the stronger overall choice: it goes further in the real world, shrugs off rain, and costs dramatically less, while still keeping up with typical bike-lane speeds. The RAZOR Icon fights back with better styling, nicer road feel from the rear motor, and that unmistakable "grown-up childhood scooter" vibe, but you pay a hefty nostalgia tax and get less range and weaker value in return.
Pick the ES80 if you're a cost-sensitive commuter who rides in all weather and just wants something that works. Choose the Icon if your rides are short, your roads are smooth, and you care more about design and brand nostalgia than spec-sheet efficiency. For everyone else, keep reading - the devil, as always, is in the details, and both scooters have a few surprises (and a few traps) waiting for you.
Stick around for the full breakdown before you put your money - and your commute - on the line.
There's something almost poetic about this comparison: on one side, the AOVOPRO ES80, a no-frills, budget workhorse clearly built by accountants; on the other, the RAZOR Icon, a gleaming slab of weaponised nostalgia aiming straight at your inner twelve-year-old. I've spent time on both, in the rain and in the sun, on smooth bike paths and sadistic cobblestones, and neither scooter is quite what its marketing promises.
They land in a very similar weight and performance bracket, yet they take almost opposite approaches. The ES80 is the spreadsheet champion: more range, more waterproofing, more "sensible adult decision". The Icon is the emotional purchase: prettier, more playful, and surprisingly fun - until you look at the price tag and charging time. If you're torn between head and heart, this is exactly the matchup you need to read.
Let's dig in and see which one deserves a spot in your hallway - and which should stay in your browser history.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
Both scooters live in the lightweight urban commuter category: slim decks, no suspension, solid tyres, modest motors, and a focus on portability over brute force. They're the "carry up three flights of stairs without swearing (much)" class - not the big-tire, dual-motor monsters.
The AOVOPRO ES80 clearly targets budget-conscious commuters: students, young professionals, and anyone staring at monthly bus passes thinking, "There has to be a cheaper way." It's the kind of scooter you buy because it makes financial sense, not because you dream about it at night.
The RAZOR Icon, by contrast, is aimed at the nostalgia-driven urban rider who values style and brand familiarity. It's for the person who wants something fun, light, and recognisable, and who rides shorter distances on mostly decent tarmac. Where the ES80 screams "value", the Icon whispers "remember me?"
Same weight, similar top speeds, similar tyre size, solid tyres on both, but wildly different price tags. That's why this comparison matters: you're essentially choosing between spending as little as possible for maximum utility, or spending a lot more to feel something.
Design & Build Quality
Pick up the ES80 and the Icon back-to-back and you immediately feel the difference in design philosophy. The AOVOPRO looks and feels like the standard-issue generic commuter template: matte colours, familiar folding stem geometry, and those honeycomb solid tyres you've probably seen a dozen times under different brand names. Nothing offensive, nothing exciting - it's the beige Toyota Corolla of scooters.
The Razor Icon is the opposite. The bare aluminium frame, coloured accents, and beautifully simple lines look and feel more premium in the hand. The welds are generally cleaner, the deck grip and stem integration are better executed, and the whole thing has that "designed by humans, not by cost-cutting software" vibe. It genuinely turns heads in a way the ES80 never will.
That said, build quality is more than surface glamour. The ES80 is very obviously an aggressively cost-optimised product: decent overall assembly, but community reports of occasional frame weld failures and folding latch issues mean you need to keep an eye on it, especially if you're heavier or ride hard. It feels fine out of the box, but you don't get the sense it was built with twenty years of daily abuse in mind.
The Icon feels tighter and more solid when you ride it, but it carries its own skeleton in the closet: the downtube recall issue. Razor did address it, but the fact that it ever happened on a scooter this expensive does raise an eyebrow. Once you're on a corrected unit, though, the frame and hinge feel reassuringly rigid, and there's less "budget buzz" in the cockpit than on the ES80.
Short version: the Icon looks and feels more premium, the ES80 feels more generic but mostly functional. Neither is flawless, but only one is priced as if it were.
Ride Comfort & Handling
On smooth asphalt, both scooters are fine. On anything else, "fine" quickly turns into "how much do I really need my fillings?" - because we're talking no suspension and solid tyres on both sides.
The ES80's honeycomb tyres do take a little of the edge off sharper hits. On moderately rough city patches, they give you a slightly muted thud rather than a direct punch to the wrists. I've done several kilometres of broken pavement on it; by the end my feet and hands knew about it, but it was tolerable. On cobblestones, though, the scooter vibrates like it's trying to shake its way back to the factory.
The Razor Icon feels a bit more direct and communicative - which is a polite way of saying you feel more of everything. The solid tyres combined with the stiffer, skinny aluminium frame amplify small surface imperfections. On pristine bike lanes it feels nimble and lively; on poor roads it crosses quickly into "this is getting old" territory. Expect hand fatigue if you spend more than half an hour on rougher surfaces.
Handling-wise, the Icon is the more playful scooter. The rear motor gives it a push rather than a pull, which makes corner exits feel smoother and more natural, and the slightly sportier stance encourages quick direction changes. It resists understeer better when you lean into turns.
The ES80 is more neutral: predictable, a touch front-heavy, and happy to trundle along straight bike lanes all day. The front-motor layout means if you get ambitious in the wet, that front wheel can feel twitchier on manhole covers and paint. It's not terrible, but you do need to ride with a bit of mechanical sympathy.
Neither of these scooters is "comfortable" in the grand sense of the word. But if we're ranking punishment levels, the ES80 is slightly less brutal over bad surfaces, while the Icon wins on agility and overall fun-to-steer factor - as long as the ground is kind.
Performance
Both scooters live in the "urban legal-ish" speed band: fast enough to keep up with bike traffic, not fast enough to terrify responsible adults. The ES80 has a marginally higher unlockable top speed on paper; in practice, the difference between it and the Icon is small enough that your headwind will matter more than your model choice.
The power delivery, however, feels quite different. The ES80's front motor has a slightly stronger initial punch. It gets off the line with a bit more enthusiasm, especially in its sportier mode, and it holds pace on flat ground respectably. At its top setting it delivers a "let's get this commute done" pace rather than a "whee, this is wild" experience. Cruise control helps on longer, straight runs - thumb off, brain on.
The Icon's rear motor has slightly lower rated power but benefits from pushing from behind and a lively throttle curve. Once you kick to start and the motor catches, the acceleration feels surprisingly eager for a scooter this light. In Sport mode it happily zips up to its ceiling and sits there, and the sensation of speed feels a touch more exciting than the raw numbers suggest - partly because you're standing on what looks like an overpowered childhood toy.
When the road tilts upward, neither scooter is a hill-climbing champion. The ES80's extra muscle on paper helps a bit on gentle inclines, especially for lighter riders, but once you get into serious gradients, both will slow and may require kicking if you're heavier. The Icon feels like it runs out of breath a little earlier; the ES80 hangs on just a bit better, but we're talking "less bad" rather than "good" if you live in a hilly city.
Braking is another story. The ES80 combines a rear mechanical disc with front electronic braking, giving you a reasonably confident stop when properly tuned. The initial bite can feel a bit sharp, but at least you've got a genuine friction brake doing the main work, with electronic assist up front.
The Icon's electronic brake plus old-school stomp brake combo is clever but less reassuring at speed. The thumb brake alone can slow you smoothly, but if you're moving quickly and need to stop hard, you'll inevitably end up using the rear fender. It works, but modulating a foot brake precisely in a panic stop isn't everyone's favourite skill test. I'd trust the ES80 more when a taxi door opens three metres ahead.
Battery & Range
This is where the ES80 quietly walks away with the boring-but-important trophy. Its battery pack is simply larger, and in real-world riding that translates into a noticeably longer usable range. Riding both at full-tilt urban speeds with a mixed pattern of stops, turns, and mild inclines, the ES80 will reliably take you further before the display starts guilt-tripping you.
With the Icon, you start to feel the limits much sooner. Its claimed range is ambitious; in reality, you're looking at shorter, more modest trips before you're watching that last bar nervously. For short, inner-city hops it's fine. But if your daily loop starts creeping into double-digit kilometres, you'll either be charging more often or learning how it rolls as an unpowered kick scooter sooner than you'd like.
Charging time is another painful point for the Icon. It takes most of a working day or a full night to recover from empty, which simply feels outdated for a relatively small battery. The ES80, while not exactly a fast-charging monster, gets back to full significantly quicker - topping it up at work or during a long coffee stop is realistic.
On range and battery practicality, the ES80 isn't just a little better; it feels like it belongs to a more modern idea of commuting. The Icon can do the job, but you need to plan around it more than you should at its price.
Portability & Practicality
Both scooters weigh around the same, and both fold down into a long, slim package with the stem locked to the rear. Carrying either up stairs or onto a train is perfectly manageable for most adults; they're in that sweet spot where you won't love the weight, but it won't ruin your day.
The ES80 has the classic Xiaomi-style folding latch: flick, drop, hook, done. It's quick and familiar. Once folded, it's long but relatively narrow, so weaving through tight spaces or storing it behind a desk is fairly easy. The handlebars don't fold in, but the overall profile is still commuter-friendly.
The Icon's folding mechanism feels more refined and less rattly, and the carry balance is very good. However, the fixed-width handlebars make it that bit more awkward to stash in very tight spots or in a small car boot. It's a subtle difference, but you notice it when you're trying to wedge it between luggage or in a cramped hallway.
Where practicality really diverges is weather and daily abuse. The ES80 proudly advertises robust water resistance, and I've ridden it through proper Northern European drizzle without losing sleep. You still shouldn't play submarine with it, but puddles and wet commutes are clearly part of the design brief.
The Icon, on the other hand, is more of a fair-weather companion. Razor isn't shouting about water resistance for a reason, and between the solid tyres and conservative stance on rain, it's not the scooter I'd want to rely on in a city where pavement is wet half the year. Combined with its shorter real-world range, it feels more like a fun accessory than a serious daily tool.
Safety
Safety here is a mix of braking, grip, lighting, and structural confidence - and both scooters have some caveats.
The ES80's dual braking system inspires more confidence at genuine urban speeds. Having a proper disc brake at the rear, backed by electronic front assistance, means you can haul the scooter down with reasonable authority once you've dialled out any factory squeaks. The solid tyres hurt wet grip - especially on metal covers or painted lines - but that's a shared curse with the Icon.
The Icon's regen plus stomp brake setup is adequate for the speeds it reaches, but not exactly inspiring when traffic does something stupid. The electronic brake is smooth, but its strongest mode still doesn't feel as assertive as a good mechanical disc. The stomp brake adds an extra emergency layer, but relying on a shoe-and-fender combo as your hard-stop method in 2025 feels, well, a bit retro in the wrong way.
Lighting on both is "fine" rather than "fantastic." You get stem-mounted front LEDs and rear brake-activated lights. The Icon's brake light is particularly noticeable, which is a plus. However, if you regularly ride at night on unlit paths, you'll want an aftermarket front light on either scooter - the stock beams are more about being seen than seeing.
Structurally, you're choosing your risk profile. The ES80 has those scattered but worrying reports of frame weld issues after heavy use; the Icon has an official recall history on the downtube. In both cases, a pre-ride check of stem latch, bolts, and overall play is not optional - it's just part of owning a lightweight, folding scooter at this price/performance level.
Community Feedback
| AOVOPRO ES80 | RAZOR Icon |
|---|---|
What riders love
|
What riders love
|
What riders complain about
|
What riders complain about
|
Price & Value
This category is, frankly, brutal. The ES80 comes in at a price where you double-check if someone missed a digit. For that money you get adult-capable speed, decent real-world range, app features, and proper water resistance. The compromises - rough ride, basic build, unglamorous design - are forgivable because the entry price is so low.
The Razor Icon, by contrast, lives in a mid-range price bracket where it has to compete with scooters offering pneumatic tyres, better suspension, and larger batteries. It doesn't. You're paying a substantial premium for style, branding, and that playful feel, not for superior spec. If you buy it, you're consciously accepting that the calculator says "no", but your inner teenager says "yes".
From a pure value-for-money perspective, the ES80 wins by a country mile. The Icon can still be worth it if the look and brand really matter to you - but that's an emotional justification, not a rational one.
Service & Parts Availability
AOVOPRO operates in the classic budget, semi-generic ecosystem. Official support can be slow or inconsistent, especially once the scooter has left the honeymoon period. However, because the ES80 shares its DNA with a huge number of similar models, third-party parts, compatible accessories, and community repair guides are everywhere. You might not get a helpful email, but you will absolutely find a YouTube video.
Razor, on the other hand, is a legacy brand with established distribution. You're more likely to find official parts and structured support channels, and dealing with a recall is something they at least have procedures for. That said, the enthusiast community sees Razor as a bit behind the curve technically, so while support is there, you won't find quite the same modding ecosystem and deep-dive repair culture you get around ES80-type scooters.
If you're handy and happy to tinker, the ES80 ecosystem is surprisingly friendly. If you'd rather deal with a recognisable logo and conventional retail support when things go wrong, the Razor badge has its advantages.
Pros & Cons Summary
| AOVOPRO ES80 | RAZOR Icon |
|---|---|
Pros
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
Cons
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | AOVOPRO ES80 | RAZOR Icon |
|---|---|---|
| Motor power (rated) | 350 W front hub | 300 W rear hub |
| Top speed (claimed/unlocked) | Up to 31 km/h | Up to 29 km/h |
| Realistic top cruising speed | Mid-high 20s km/h | High 20s km/h |
| Range (claimed) | 35 km | 29 km |
| Range (realistic) | 20-25 km | 16-20 km |
| Battery capacity | 378 Wh (36 V 10,5 Ah) | Approx. 262 Wh (36,5 V) |
| Weight | 12 kg | 12 kg |
| Brakes | Rear mechanical disc + front eABS | Electronic thumb + rear stomp |
| Suspension | None | None |
| Tyres | 8,5" solid honeycomb | 8,5" solid rubber |
| Max load | 120 kg | 100 kg |
| Water resistance | IP65 | Not clearly rated / minimal |
| Charging time | 4-5 hours | 8 hours |
| App connectivity | Yes | No (simple controls) |
| Approximate price | 237 € | 490 € |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
Viewed purely as a transport tool, the AOVOPRO ES80 comes out ahead. It goes further per charge, charges quicker, copes with wet commutes, and costs less than many people spend on a couple of months of public transport. It's not glamorous, and you'll feel every pothole, but it quietly does the job of getting you around town with the least financial drama.
The Razor Icon is, honestly, a lovely object that makes less sense the more you scrutinise it. It's fun to ride on good surfaces, it looks fantastic, and it's incredibly easy to carry - but the range, charge time, and firm ride make it hard to recommend as a primary commuter unless your daily loop is short, your roads are smooth, and you are consciously choosing style and brand over efficiency.
If you're a practical commuter in a real city with real weather, the ES80 is the safer recommendation despite its budget rough edges. If you're a lighter rider with a short, sunny urban route, a soft spot for that aluminium Razor silhouette, and a willingness to pay extra for the nostalgia hit, the Icon will absolutely make you smile - just go in with your eyes open about what you're (not) getting for the money.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | AOVOPRO ES80 | RAZOR Icon |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ✅ 0,63 €/Wh | ❌ 1,87 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ✅ 7,65 €/km/h | ❌ 16,90 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ✅ 31,75 g/Wh | ❌ 45,80 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | ✅ 0,39 kg/km/h | ❌ 0,41 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ✅ 10,53 €/km | ❌ 27,22 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ✅ 0,53 kg/km | ❌ 0,67 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ❌ 16,80 Wh/km | ✅ 14,56 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ✅ 11,29 W/(km/h) | ❌ 10,34 W/(km/h) |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | ✅ 0,034 kg/W | ❌ 0,040 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ✅ 84,00 W | ❌ 32,75 W |
In plain language: price-per-anything strongly favours the ES80 - you simply get more battery, speed, and range potential for each euro and each kilogram you carry. The Icon does win one metric: energy efficiency in Wh per km, meaning it sips power a bit more gently per kilometre. But slower charging, smaller battery and higher purchase price erase that advantage in daily use. Power-to-speed and weight-to-power ratios again tilt toward the ES80, underlining its stronger value and performance balance.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | AOVOPRO ES80 | RAZOR Icon |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ✅ Same, but cheaper | ✅ Same, stylish package |
| Range | ✅ Longer real-world range | ❌ Shorter usable distance |
| Max Speed | ✅ Slightly higher unlocked | ❌ Marginally slower |
| Power | ✅ Stronger rated motor | ❌ Less punch on hills |
| Battery Size | ✅ Significantly larger pack | ❌ Smaller capacity |
| Suspension | ❌ None, harsh ride | ❌ None, very firm |
| Design | ❌ Generic, derivative look | ✅ Iconic, premium aesthetic |
| Safety | ✅ Better braking, IP rating | ❌ Weaker brakes, recall |
| Practicality | ✅ Weatherproof, more range | ❌ Fair-weather, shorter legs |
| Comfort | ✅ Slightly softer honeycombs | ❌ Harsher, more vibration |
| Features | ✅ App, cruise, eABS | ❌ Minimal, no app |
| Serviceability | ✅ Generic parts, DIY-friendly | ✅ Brand parts widely available |
| Customer Support | ❌ Inconsistent, budget brand | ✅ Established support network |
| Fun Factor | ❌ Functional, little character | ✅ Nostalgic, playful ride |
| Build Quality | ❌ Feels cost-cut, occasional issues | ✅ Tighter, more refined feel |
| Component Quality | ❌ Very budget-level parts | ✅ Slightly higher grade |
| Brand Name | ❌ Lesser-known budget label | ✅ Strong, recognisable brand |
| Community | ✅ Huge modding user base | ❌ Smaller enthusiast presence |
| Lights (visibility) | ✅ Adequate, simple setup | ✅ Good brake light effect |
| Lights (illumination) | ❌ Needs extra front light | ❌ Also needs extra light |
| Acceleration | ✅ Stronger initial punch | ❌ Slightly softer overall |
| Arrive with smile factor | ❌ Satisfying but workmanlike | ✅ Grin-inducing nostalgia |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ✅ Longer range, less anxiety | ❌ Range and comfort worries |
| Charging speed | ✅ Much quicker turnaround | ❌ Very slow recharge |
| Reliability | ❌ QC gremlins, weld stories | ❌ Recall plus solid-tyre stress |
| Folded practicality | ✅ Narrower, easier to stash | ❌ Wider bars, awkward fit |
| Ease of transport | ✅ Light, acceptable ergonomics | ✅ Light, good balance |
| Handling | ❌ Safe but a bit dull | ✅ Livelier, nicer through turns |
| Braking performance | ✅ Disc plus e-brake combo | ❌ Regen + stomp less strong |
| Riding position | ✅ Standard, neutral stance | ✅ Comfortable, familiar stance |
| Handlebar quality | ❌ Basic, budget grips | ✅ Nicer feel, stiffer |
| Throttle response | ❌ Slight lag reported | ✅ Smooth, predictable curve |
| Dashboard/Display | ✅ Simple, functional readout | ✅ Clean integrated display |
| Security (locking) | ❌ No dedicated lock point | ✅ Built-in lock mount |
| Weather protection | ✅ IP65, rain-capable | ❌ Not happy in rain |
| Resale value | ❌ Weak brand on used market | ✅ Razor name helps resale |
| Tuning potential | ✅ Big modding community | ❌ Less common to modify |
| Ease of maintenance | ✅ Generic parts, many guides | ❌ More proprietary elements |
| Value for Money | ✅ Outstanding for commuters | ❌ Paying heavy nostalgia tax |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the AOVOPRO ES80 scores 9 points against the RAZOR Icon's 1. In the Author's Category Battle, the AOVOPRO ES80 gets 24 ✅ versus 18 ✅ for RAZOR Icon (with a few ties sprinkled in).
Totals: AOVOPRO ES80 scores 33, RAZOR Icon scores 19.
Based on the scoring, the AOVOPRO ES80 is our overall winner. Between these two, the AOVOPRO ES80 is the scooter I'd actually live with day to day. It may not stir the soul, but it quietly delivers more freedom per euro and copes better with real-world commuting nonsense like rain, distance, and forgotten chargers. The Razor Icon is undeniably charming and more emotionally satisfying on a short, sunny ride, but its compromises and price make it harder to recommend as anything more than a stylish toy for shorter hops. If you want a scooter that makes sense to your wallet and your schedule, the ES80 is the more complete package. If you're buying mainly for the way it looks leaning against the café wall, the Icon will make you happy - just don't ask it to do a boring, grown-up commute too often.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.