Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
The INMOTION AIR PRO is the more complete scooter overall: it rides tighter, feels better engineered, has stronger safety and weather protection, and is far more reassuring as a long-term daily commuter. It is the pick for riders who want a fast, neatly built, low-maintenance urban machine they can trust.
The AOVOPRO ESMAX makes sense if every euro counts and you want maximum specs for minimum money, and you are willing to accept weaker quality control, more DIY, and a rougher ownership experience in exchange. It is the "cheap thrill" option, not the "sleep-well" option.
If you care about reliability, build and everyday usability, keep reading-the differences become very obvious once you imagine living with each scooter for a year.
Electric scooters have grown up. We are no longer just picking between wobbly toys that barely climb a curb; today's mid-range commuters can actually replace a car for many city dwellers. The AOVOPRO ESMAX and INMOTION AIR PRO sit right in that sweet spot where speed, range and price intersect, but they approach the problem from very different angles.
The ESMAX is the classic "spec sheet hero": big battery, chunky motor, full suspension and a price tag that looks like a typo. It's aimed at riders who want the most scooter per euro and are prepared to roll the dice on support. The Air Pro is the grown-up answer: more refined, more predictable, a bit more expensive, and very clearly designed by people who expect you to ride it hard, day after day, in real cities with real weather.
If you are torn between the tempting bargain and the polished commuter, stick around-because how they differ in build, comfort and long-term ownership will probably decide it for you.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
On paper, these two scooters live in the same world: single-motor commuters, roughly similar top speeds, similar real-world ranges, and enough torque to feel "properly fast" compared to rental fleets. Both will get you across town much quicker than a Lime or a Xiaomi clone, and both are light enough to drag into a flat without needing a gym membership.
The difference is philosophy. The AOVOPRO ESMAX is the budget hot-rod: full suspension, big battery, big motor rating, rock-bottom price. It is gunning straight at riders who would normally buy the cheapest thing on Amazon, but want more power and some semblance of comfort.
The INMOTION AIR PRO is the mid-tier professional: it costs around twice as much as the ESMAX, but it feels like a product, not a project. You get better waterproofing, cleaner integration, stronger brand backing and a far tighter, more confidence-inspiring ride. Put bluntly: if you view your scooter as a daily transport tool rather than a toy, these two absolutely belong in the same comparison.
Design & Build Quality
Pick up the AOVOPRO ESMAX and it immediately feels like a familiar generic chassis turned up to eleven. The lines are classic "Xiaomi-but-angrier": matte frame, a few red accents, cables visible, suspension units clearly bolted on. The display is surprisingly bright and colourful for the price and does a decent impression of a more premium dashboard, but the overall impression in the hand is "budget but functional". There is sometimes a hint of play in the joints even when new, and the finishes and welds aren't exactly jewellery-grade.
The INMOTION AIR PRO, in contrast, feels like it was designed rather than assembled from a catalogue. The hidden cabling makes a bigger difference than you'd expect: nothing to snag, nothing flapping in the wind, and a very clean stem that looks almost like a single moulded piece. The deck rubber, latch tolerances and general fit feel a step up. The frame is stiffer, too-when you rock it side to side, it moves as one piece rather than flexing around the folding joint.
In the hand, the Air Pro feels like something you'd confidently lean against an office wall; the ESMAX feels more like a well-modded budget scooter that's had a good upgrade session. It isn't junk, but the gulf in refinement is obvious once you touch both.
Ride Comfort & Handling
This is where spec sheets will try to trick you. The AOVOPRO ESMAX has dual spring suspension and air-filled tyres front and rear. The INMOTION AIR PRO has no formal suspension at all and a solid rear tyre. Surely the ESMAX must win by a mile, right?
On truly bad surfaces, the ESMAX is undeniably kinder to your body. Cobblestones, broken tarmac, the charming "historic" paving that some cities insist on preserving-its springs and big air tyres take the edge off the blows. After a few kilometres of rough bike paths, your knees and wrists are measurably less annoyed than they would be on the Air Pro. You can feel the fork and rear springs working, and the scooter bobs along rather than slapping you for every poor municipal decision.
The flip side is composure. The ESMAX's budget suspension hardware and looser chassis tolerance mean that at higher speeds it can feel a little floaty and imprecise. Push into a fast corner and you get more pitch and roll than you'd like; it's fine, but you will instinctively back off on bad surfaces. On long descents, I find myself making small steering corrections instead of just relaxing.
The Air Pro takes the opposite approach: no springs, but a very stiff frame and grippy front pneumatic tyre. On smooth tarmac and decent cycle paths it feels superbly planted-almost EUC-like in its solidity. The steering is precise, the deck is stable, and leaning into a sweeping corner at its top speed feels natural rather than brave. The rear solid tyre does transmit every imperfection, though. Hit a sharp-edged pothole and you feel it right through your heels. After several kilometres of truly rough roads, your legs will be doing more "active suspension" duty than on the ESMAX.
So: the ESMAX is more forgiving over random urban nastiness; the Air Pro is more confidence-inspiring when you're actually going fast. Comfort versus precision-you'll have to decide which matters more for your commute.
Performance
Both scooters sit in that lovely "fast for a commuter" zone where you can comfortably cruise above rental bike speeds, but you're not yet flirting with motorcycle territory. The ESMAX boasts a strongly rated front motor that can peak well above its headline rating, and it does feel punchy off the line. From a standstill, it leaps ahead eagerly, especially if you're a lighter rider. On short, sharp hills it maintains a respectable pace and doesn't instantly bog down like the typical entry-level rental clones.
The Air Pro, despite a slightly more modest rated figure, has a very well-tuned rear motor that delivers its peak power efficiently. Rear-wheel drive helps more than brochures tell you: instead of spinning away traction on steep or dusty starts, it squats and hooks up. Acceleration feels cleaner, quieter and more predictable. There's less drama, but more control-particularly useful in wet weather or on painted crossings.
In head-to-head sprints with average-weight riders, the Air Pro doesn't feel slower; if anything, its smoother throttle and rear-drive traction make it easier to extract full performance consistently. Both will pull up to their maximum regulated speeds and sit there happily on the flat. The difference is that on the ESMAX you're more aware of the chassis working underneath you at the top end, while the Air Pro stays reassuringly composed.
Braking performance is broadly similar in concept-both rely on a front drum plus rear electronic braking-but again the execution differs. The ESMAX's front drum has decent bite, and the rear motor brake helps shorten stopping distances, though lever feel can be a bit vague until adjusted properly. On the Air Pro the combination is better tuned: the electronic brake engages progressively, then the front drum steps in with predictable force. Hard emergency stops feel less "on/off" and more controlled, which is exactly what you want when a car door opens in front of you.
On moderate urban hills, both scooters cope; the ESMAX leans on its higher peak rating, while the Air Pro uses efficient motor control and gearing. Once gradients get properly nasty, neither is pretending to be a dual-motor mountain goat, but in typical European city terrain they'll both keep you riding rather than walking.
Battery & Range
The ESMAX carries a significantly larger battery pack, and it shows in potential range. Ride it sensibly-cruising in the mid-twenties, mixing flats with gentle slopes-and you can realistically tick off a good chunk of commuting distance on a single charge. Even with the speed unlocked and a bit of enthusiasm at the throttle, it will usually do a full there-and-back for most urban riders without anxiety.
The Air Pro has a smaller pack, but it is also slightly lighter and more efficiently tuned. In the real world, typical riders report ranges that overlap surprisingly strongly with the ESMAX unless you're absolutely hammering one and babying the other. Cruise at moderate speed and you're still looking at a very typical commuter distance without hunting for a socket. Push the Air Pro in Sport mode at full chat and you'll see the gauge drop more quickly, but again, for realistic city distances it manages fine.
Charging is where the difference in philosophy bites. The ESMAX tops up in a working afternoon or evening; you can arrive home low, plug it in, and be full again by the time you're off to meet friends. The Air Pro, with its slower charge rate, is much more of an overnight affair-drain it completely and you're not bouncing back to full in a couple of hours. For most people who plug in every evening, this is irrelevant, but if you regularly do long morning and evening rides with only a short gap between, the ESMAX's quicker refill is handy.
Range anxiety is low with either as long as your commute is sane. The ESMAX gives you a slightly fatter safety margin; the Air Pro counters with better BMS integration and a brand that has historically treated batteries carefully. If you plan on repeatedly riding deep into the pack, I'd personally trust the Air Pro a bit more over years of abuse, but the ESMAX undeniably offers more watt-hours per euro.
Portability & Practicality
On the scale, there is only a little more than half a kilo between them, but in the real world it's noticeable. The ESMAX feels like a scooter that happened to gain weight over time: suspension hardware, bigger battery, chunkier frame. Carrying it up a few stairs is fine; dragging it multiple flights daily quickly becomes a chore. The folded package is suitably compact in length but not particularly svelte, and the more exposed cabling and hardware make it a bit more snag-prone in narrow spaces.
The Air Pro feels much more purpose-built as a "carry sometimes" machine. The stem locks down positively, the clean lines mean nothing catches as you move through doorways, and the slightly lower weight is very obvious when lifting it into a car boot or onto a train. It's still not a featherweight toy, but it is on the right side of the line where most adults can carry it one-handed without regretting life decisions.
Day-to-day, the Air Pro wins on practicality: better waterproofing means you're less worried about getting caught in a shower; the solid rear tyre means no roadside tube changes; the drum brake keeps maintenance minimal. The ESMAX adds complexity: more moving parts in the suspension, more tyre worries (even with self-sealing gel), and a frame that really appreciates regular bolt checks.
Safety
Both scooters tick the basic boxes: practical dual braking, front lighting, and decent-sized wheels. But the execution again diverges.
The AOVOPRO ESMAX's 10-inch air tyres and dual suspension help with stability on uneven ground. When you hit rough patches at speed, having the wheels stay better planted is genuinely important. The front drum plus rear electronic braking combo works well enough once set up properly, and the high-mounted headlight and flashing tail light give reasonable visibility. However, reports of stem play developing over time and the occasional horror story about structural issues mean that, from a safety-at-any-cost perspective, it's hard to ignore the QC lottery.
The INMOTION AIR PRO leans heavily on engineering thoroughness. The lower centre of gravity from the deck-mounted battery, stiff chassis and carefully tuned braking system all contribute to a scooter that feels stable and predictable when you really need it to. The lighting is better than typical in this segment, with a genuinely usable headlight that lets you see the road, not just be seen. Then there's weather protection: the IP rating on the body and the even higher protection for the battery pack mean the odds of a sudden wet-weather electrical failure are drastically reduced.
If your riding involves fast mixed traffic, wet roads and regular night use, the Air Pro's stability, weather sealing and braking refinement give it a solid safety edge. The ESMAX can certainly be ridden safely-but it asks more of the rider in terms of vigilance and mechanical sympathy.
Community Feedback
| AOVOPRO ESMAX | INMOTION AIR PRO |
|---|---|
| What riders love Punchy acceleration for the price; genuinely useful suspension on rough paths; big battery for long commutes; self-sealing air tyres; app features like locking and custom modes; extremely strong specs-per-euro value. |
What riders love Strong speed in a light package; clean, premium design with hidden cables; low-maintenance rear tyre and drum brake; excellent water resistance; solid, rattle-free build; confident braking and bright headlight. |
| What riders complain about Inconsistent quality control; occasional reports of frame or weld issues; customer support that can be hard to reach; optimistic range claims; stem wobble developing over time; weight heavier than expected for stairs. |
What riders complain about Harsh ride on broken surfaces; solid rear tyre with less grip and comfort in the wet; long full charge time; folding hook feeling a bit basic; kick-start requirement annoying some users; display visibility in harsh sunlight. |
Price & Value
Let's address the elephant in the room: the AOVOPRO ESMAX is dramatically cheaper. It lives in the low three-hundreds, a territory usually filled with wobbly, under-powered, non-suspended scooters that feel like they belong in a toy shop. For that kind of money, getting a big battery, strong motor, air tyres and suspension is impressive. If you purely judge "how much hardware can I buy with this cash?", the ESMAX is an easy win.
The INMOTION AIR PRO, by contrast, costs roughly double. You could almost buy two ESMAX scooters for one Air Pro if you shop during the right discount season. But value is not just about what's bolted on out of the box; it's also about how much hassle you'll have over several years. Avoided repairs, fewer failures, better weather protection, and a support network you can actually talk to all have a very real financial value.
If your budget is genuinely tight and you're prepared for the occasional DIY session-and some risk-the ESMAX gives you incredible bang for your buck. If you can stretch the budget, the Air Pro feels much more like money well spent: fewer unpleasant surprises, higher daily satisfaction, and a scooter you're more likely to still be riding happily a couple of winters down the line.
Service & Parts Availability
This is where the brand names start to matter. AOVOPRO sells primarily through online channels and marketplaces. That keeps prices low but leaves a gap when things go wrong. Rider stories about slow or patchy responses, tricky warranty claims and long waits for parts are common enough that you should not ignore them. The upside is that, because the ESMAX is popular in budget circles, community guides and third-party parts do exist-you just need to be willing to tinker.
INMOTION, by contrast, has an established network of distributors and dealers in Europe and beyond. Parts are easier to source, and there are authorised service centres that actually know the product. It's not as instant and ubiquitous as, say, a smartphone brand, but it is worlds apart from the drop-ship experience. If relying on your scooter for daily commuting, having that safety net is, frankly, a big deal.
Pros & Cons Summary
| AOVOPRO ESMAX | INMOTION AIR PRO |
|---|---|
Pros
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
Cons
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | AOVOPRO ESMAX | INMOTION AIR PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Motor rated power | 500 W front | 400 W rear |
| Motor peak power | 1.000 W (approx.) | 750 W |
| Top speed (unlocked) | ca. 35 km/h | ca. 35 km/h |
| Battery capacity | ca. 609 Wh | 438 Wh |
| Claimed range | 35-45 km | 35-48 km |
| Realistic range (mixed use) | ca. 25-30 km | ca. 25-35 km |
| Weight | 18,5 kg | 17,7 kg |
| Brakes | Front drum, rear electronic (KERS) | Front drum, rear electronic |
| Suspension | Front and rear springs | None |
| Tyres | 10" pneumatic, self-sealing | 10" front pneumatic, 10" rear solid PU |
| Max rider load | 120 kg | 120 kg |
| Water resistance | IP65 (claimed, varies by source) | IP55 body / IPX7 battery |
| Charging time | ca. 4-5 h | ca. 8,5 h |
| Approximate price | 310 € | 661 € |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
If this were a decision made purely on a spreadsheet, the AOVOPRO ESMAX would be a runaway bargain. For the price of a very average commuter, you get real speed, suspension and a big battery. If you are mechanically handy, ride mostly in decent weather, and need the absolute cheapest way to get that level of performance, the ESMAX is hard to ignore. Treat it kindly, check your bolts, and it can be a genuinely fun little rocket for everyday use.
But if you factor in long-term ownership, day-in-day-out reliability and the "do I trust this at 30-plus in the rain?" test, the INMOTION AIR PRO pulls clearly ahead. It feels better built, rides more predictably, shrugs off bad weather more confidently, and demands less faffing with tools. You trade some comfort on broken roads for a chassis that simply feels safer and more mature at speed.
So: pick the AOVOPRO ESMAX if you're on a tight budget, love the idea of big specs for small money, and don't mind occasionally getting your hands dirty. Choose the INMOTION AIR PRO if you want a scooter that just works, looks refined, and will still feel like a smart decision after the honeymoon period has worn off.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | AOVOPRO ESMAX | INMOTION AIR PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ✅ 0,51 €/Wh | ❌ 1,51 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ✅ 8,86 €/km/h | ❌ 18,89 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ✅ 30,38 g/Wh | ❌ 40,41 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | ❌ 0,53 kg/km/h | ✅ 0,51 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ✅ 11,27 €/km | ❌ 22,03 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ❌ 0,67 kg/km | ✅ 0,59 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ❌ 22,15 Wh/km | ✅ 14,60 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ✅ 28,57 W/km/h | ❌ 21,43 W/km/h |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | ✅ 0,037 kg/W | ❌ 0,044 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ✅ 135,33 W | ❌ 51,53 W |
These metrics strip things down to pure maths: how much battery and performance you get for your money and weight, how efficient each scooter is per kilometre, and how quickly the packs refill. Lower "per-something" numbers are usually better - less money or mass for the same output. Higher power-to-speed means more punch for the top speed, and higher average charging power means quicker turnarounds. They don't reflect build quality or reliability, but they're useful for understanding the raw value and efficiency landscape.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | AOVOPRO ESMAX | INMOTION AIR PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ❌ Heavier to haul upstairs | ✅ Slightly lighter, easier carry |
| Range | ✅ Bigger battery, solid distance | ❌ Smaller pack, similar range |
| Max Speed | ✅ Matches class top speed | ✅ Same brisk top speed |
| Power | ✅ Stronger peak punch | ❌ Less outright peak shove |
| Battery Size | ✅ Noticeably larger capacity | ❌ Smaller, but well managed |
| Suspension | ✅ Dual springs smooth bumps | ❌ No suspension hardware |
| Design | ❌ Generic clone vibes | ✅ Sleek, integrated, modern |
| Safety | ❌ QC doubts, mixed waterproofing | ✅ Stable, sealed, predictable |
| Practicality | ❌ More maintenance, bulkier feel | ✅ Easy to live with daily |
| Comfort | ✅ Softer on rough surfaces | ❌ Firm, transmits road harshness |
| Features | ✅ App, cruise, full suspension | ❌ Fewer headline features |
| Serviceability | ❌ Parts, support more awkward | ✅ Better dealer, parts access |
| Customer Support | ❌ Slow, inconsistent reports | ✅ Established brand assistance |
| Fun Factor | ✅ Cheap thrills, punchy feel | ✅ Zippy, refined speed |
| Build Quality | ❌ QC lottery, flexy chassis | ✅ Solid, tight construction |
| Component Quality | ❌ Budget hardware, compromises | ✅ Better chosen components |
| Brand Name | ❌ Lesser-known, mixed reputation | ✅ Established, respected PEV brand |
| Community | ✅ Big budget-tinkerer crowd | ✅ Strong, enthusiast community |
| Lights (visibility) | ❌ Adequate but unremarkable | ✅ Brighter, better positioned |
| Lights (illumination) | ❌ OK, add extra if night-riding | ✅ Genuinely lights your path |
| Acceleration | ✅ Aggressive, strong initial pull | ❌ Smoother, slightly tamer launch |
| Arrive with smile factor | ✅ Fast, floaty budget rocket | ✅ Quick, confidence-inspiring ride |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ❌ Nagging reliability worries | ✅ Feels trustworthy, composed |
| Charging speed | ✅ Much quicker full recharge | ❌ Long overnight top-ups |
| Reliability | ❌ Structural and QC concerns | ✅ Generally robust and durable |
| Folded practicality | ❌ Bulkier, more snag points | ✅ Clean, compact, easy carry |
| Ease of transport | ❌ Awkward for regular stairs | ✅ Manageable one-hand carry |
| Handling | ❌ Softer, less precise feel | ✅ Sharp, stable, confidence-building |
| Braking performance | ❌ Works, but less refined | ✅ Smooth, well-tuned response |
| Riding position | ✅ Comfortable stance, decent deck | ✅ Good ergonomics, solid posture |
| Handlebar quality | ❌ Functional, basic feel | ✅ Better grips, solid bar |
| Throttle response | ✅ Strong, sine-wave smoothness | ✅ Linear, predictable mapping |
| Dashboard/Display | ✅ Bright, colourful budget screen | ❌ Functional but less flashy |
| Security (locking) | ✅ App lock, electronic resistance | ✅ App lock, standard options |
| Weather protection | ❌ Mixed reports, be cautious | ✅ Proper IP rating, sealed pack |
| Resale value | ❌ Budget brand, drops faster | ✅ Stronger brand holds value |
| Tuning potential | ✅ Popular with modders | ❌ Less commonly tinkered |
| Ease of maintenance | ❌ More moving parts, flats | ✅ Fewer issues, rear solid |
| Value for Money | ✅ Insane specs for price | ✅ Justified cost for quality |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the AOVOPRO ESMAX scores 7 points against the INMOTION AIR PRO's 3. In the Author's Category Battle, the AOVOPRO ESMAX gets 18 ✅ versus 29 ✅ for INMOTION AIR PRO (with a few ties sprinkled in).
Totals: AOVOPRO ESMAX scores 25, INMOTION AIR PRO scores 32.
Based on the scoring, the INMOTION AIR PRO is our overall winner. In the end, the INMOTION AIR PRO feels like the scooter you grow into rather than grow out of. It may not shout the loudest on paper, but on real roads, in real weather, it simply works better, feels safer and inspires more confidence every time you press the throttle. The AOVOPRO ESMAX delivers a lot of excitement for very little money and will absolutely delight riders who love a bargain and don't mind a bit of mechanical babysitting. But as a daily partner in crime, the Air Pro is the one I'd trust to get me home every time-and that quiet confidence is worth more than any spec sheet bragging rights.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.

