Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
The Apollo Air 2022 walks away as the more rounded, confidence-inspiring scooter for everyday city use, largely thanks to its calmer, more stable chassis, better safety package, and grown-up ride quality. The FLUID Horizon 2022 13Ah counters with stronger real-world range, a punchier top end, and a very compact fold, but it cuts a few corners on braking, wheel size, and weather protection that you do feel on the road.
Pick the Apollo Air if you care most about comfort, stability, and feeling like you are on a "real vehicle" rather than a hot-rodded rental. Choose the Horizon if you want more speed and range per euro, need a super-compact fold, and are willing to ride a bit more defensively. Both can work as daily commuters - the question is whether you value polish and safety (Air) or raw value and portability (Horizon).
If you want the full story - including how they behave in the rain, on bad tarmac, and on stairs - keep reading.
Electric scooter commuters love a "Goldilocks" machine: not too slow, not too heavy, not too expensive. On paper, the FLUID Horizon 2022 13Ah and the Apollo Air 2022 both claim that sweet spot. In practice, they take very different routes to get there - one leans hard into value and folding tricks, the other into refinement and road manners.
I've put plenty of real-world kilometres on both: morning commutes over cracked pavements, hurried dashes through traffic, and the inevitable late-evening rides home when the roads are wet and your brain is fried. One of these scooters consistently feels like it has your back; the other feels like a clever compromise that occasionally shows its seams.
If you're trying to decide which one you actually want to live with - not just stare at in a spec sheet - this comparison will save you a few months of "I should have bought the other one" regret.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
Both scooters sit in that mid-priced commuter bracket where you expect a proper motor, sensible range, and some form of suspension. They're aimed squarely at riders upgrading from rental fleets and budget Xiaomi-style toys into "my scooter is my daily transport" territory.
The Horizon goes after the pragmatic value hunter: you want more speed and battery for your money, you're okay with a slightly rough-and-ready feel, and you really care that it folds small enough to disappear under a desk. It's the choice for the budget-conscious rider who pushes distances and doesn't baby their scooter.
The Apollo Air targets the comfort-first commuter who rides every day, in most weather, and wants the scooter to feel stable, quiet, and predictable. Less "tuned moped," more "compact urban vehicle." You're happy to pay a bit extra if it rides better and feels safer.
So yes, they absolutely compete - same weight ballpark, same power class, similar claimed ranges - but they approach the brief from opposite ends of the design spectrum.
Design & Build Quality
Stand them side by side and the design philosophies are night and day.
The Horizon looks like a refined version of a classic Chinese platform - which, to be fair, is exactly what it is. Boxy deck, telescopic stem, folding handlebars, exposed hinges. It feels sturdy enough in the hands and the rear carry handle is genuinely useful, but you can tell function took the front seat and aesthetics caught the next bus. Nothing about it feels fragile, yet the overall impression is "smart commuter tool," not "premium product."
The Apollo Air, by contrast, looks and feels like it was actually designed, not just assembled from catalog parts. The frame is a single, chunky casting, cables are tucked away, and the deck is wrapped in a rubberised surface that cleans up with one swipe instead of collecting half the city as grit. The stem is thicker, the cockpit is minimalist, and there's far less visible hardware. It feels like a cohesive vehicle when you grab it, not a box of components.
In terms of perceived solidity while riding, the Air is on another level. The folding joint on the Horizon is fine for its class, but you can feel a bit of play in the front end if you've ridden stiffer frames. On the Apollo, once the latch is engaged, the stem might as well be welded. It's one of the few scooters in this price band where I don't subconsciously keep checking for stem wobble at speed.
If you care about clean lines, integrated design and that "no rattles, no drama" feeling, the Apollo Air takes this round without much argument. The Horizon's build is adequate and honest - but it does feel a generation behind.
Ride Comfort & Handling
This is where the two scooters feel like they come from different planets.
The Horizon runs a small air tyre at the front, a solid rubber wheel at the rear and fairly serious rear suspension. On smooth roads it's perfectly fine, and at moderate pace the suspension does a decent job swallowing bumps that would have you cursing on a rigid scooter. The issue appears when the surface gets properly bad: that small, solid rear wheel hits sharp edges hard. On long stretches of cracked pavement, the back of the scooter chatters and you feel more of it in your knees and lower back than you'd expect from something with "hydraulic suspension" on the spec sheet.
The Apollo Air goes for big pneumatic tyres front and rear plus a proper front fork. No gimmicks, no solid rubber. The difference is obvious the first time you hit a broken manhole or a brick-patched section mid-corner. The Air simply rolls over it; the Horizon lets you know exactly what you rode over. On longer rides - ten kilometres or more of bad city tarmac - the Air leaves you noticeably fresher. On the Horizon, you start doing that unconscious thing where you clench your legs before every pothole.
Handling follows the same pattern. The Horizon's narrower cockpit and smaller wheels make it feel nimble, almost skittish when pushed. It's fun in short bursts - darting through gaps, quick lane changes - but at higher speeds you always keep a bit of margin in your head because you know those small wheels and short wheelbase won't forgive every mistake.
The Apollo's wider bars and big tyres calm everything down. It tracks straight, resists twitchiness, and feels planted even when you're flat-out. On cobblestones or tram tracks, I'm much happier on the Air; on the Horizon, you pay a lot more attention, especially with that solid rear tyre stepping sideways when it hits something at the wrong angle.
If your daily route includes rough surfaces, the Apollo Air is simply kinder to your body and more confidence-inspiring in corners. The Horizon is acceptable, and certainly better than rigid budget scooters, but you can feel where they saved money.
Performance
Both scooters use motors in the same power class, and both are comfortably quicker than rental fleets - but they cater to different appetites.
The Horizon has the livelier top-end. It spins up briskly, and once you're past the initial throttle zone it pulls harder than you'd expect from something this compact. It happily runs above the usual rental-scooter limit by a solid margin, which makes it useful for keeping pace with city traffic on side streets. Off the line, it has more of that "shove" that medium-weight riders will appreciate. The flip side is that at those higher speeds, those small wheels and single rear brake keep whispering "maybe don't..." every time the road ahead looks sketchy.
The Apollo Air is more conservative at the top but smoother everywhere else. Acceleration is plenty for urban use - you'll still leave bicycles behind without thinking - but it doesn't lunge. The throttle response is very linear, and that makes low-speed control far easier: filtering slowly through pedestrians, creeping down a ramp, or feathering power on gravel feels far more natural on the Air. Once you're near its maximum, you get the sense it's deliberately capped at a speed that matches its chassis and wheel size, rather than chasing spec sheet bragging rights.
On hills, they're in the same overall league, but the Horizon's higher-voltage system gives it a slightly stronger mid-climb punch. Steeper urban ramps it will crest with a bit more determination, especially with a heavier rider. The Apollo will get you up the same hill, but with more obvious slowing toward the top. Neither is a mountain goat; on truly brutal gradients you'll be standing forward and willing the motor on both.
Braking is where the performance story takes a sharp turn. The Horizon relies on a single rear drum plus regen. That rear drum is consistent and low-maintenance, but you simply don't get the same stopping confidence as with a true dual-brake layout. You can absolutely ride it safely, but you need to plan ahead, particularly at its higher cruising speeds. Hard emergency stops demand good weight transfer and a bit of experience to avoid skids.
The Apollo Air counters with a front drum and tuned rear regen. The combination gives you proper two-wheel deceleration. You can lean on the regen a lot of the time, which feels smooth and controlled, and when you need a full-blown panic stop the front drum steps in without the drama of a grabby mechanical disc. It's not sports-bike sharp, but it's worlds more reassuring than relying on a single rear anchor.
If you value top-speed headroom and punch off the line, the Horizon will keep you more entertained. If you care about feeling in control in all conditions, the Apollo's smoother power delivery and superior brakes are the safer, more grown-up choice.
Battery & Range
Interestingly, this is the one area where the scrappier Horizon genuinely outclasses the more polished Apollo.
The Horizon packs a higher-energy pack and runs on a beefier voltage. In real life, that translates to an extra chunk of range and less of that "the scooter feels half-asleep" sensation as the battery drains. On mixed urban riding - some full-tilt stretches, some stop-and-go, a bit of hill work - it reliably manages commutes that would have the Apollo flashing low-battery warnings earlier. You can comfortably do a couple of average city days without charging if you're not hammering it constantly.
The Apollo Air, on paper, claims similar maximum figures, but in the real world its usable range lands a little shorter, especially if you're heavy on the throttle or climbing a lot. As its battery drops, you also feel the usual 36-volt fade: top speed and acceleration soften noticeably once you're down to the last third of the pack. It's not unusable, but you catch yourself nursing it home rather than just riding normally.
Charging times are in the same broad "overnight" category. The Horizon's denser pack still fills up at a reasonable pace; the Air's slightly smaller pack but more conservative charger means you're typically plugging it in for most of a working day or a full night as well. In day-to-day use, neither feels dramatically faster to charge than the other; you'll plan charges around your schedule rather than the other way round.
If you're pushing longer commutes or regularly ride fast, the Horizon is the less anxious companion. The Apollo's range is perfectly fine for typical city use - but if you're the type who always ends up taking the "longer but nicer" route home, you'll appreciate the Horizon's stamina.
Portability & Practicality
On a scale, they're almost identical. In real life, they could not be more different.
The Horizon is a masterclass in collapsing into itself. Telescopic stem, folding handlebars, compact deck, and that integrated rear handle - it becomes a surprisingly small, dense package. Getting it under a café table, into a car boot, or beside your legs on a busy train is much easier than its weight would suggest. Carrying it up a flight of stairs isn't exactly fun, but the balance and grab points make it manageable. For small-flat city dwellers, that compact fold is a genuine advantage.
The Apollo Air, despite a very similar mass, feels bulkier in every interaction. The handlebars don't fold, so the folded scooter keeps its full width - which is lovely for riding, annoying for squeezing through gaps or stashing it under an office desk. The folding latch lives low by the deck and can be stiff, making the fold/unfold routine slower and less graceful, especially if you're doing it one-handed on a station platform. It's fine for occasional stairs and car boots, but it's not the thing you casually shoulder for a long walk.
Where the Apollo claws some practicality back is in weather and idiot-proofing. Its water resistance rating means that if you get caught in a typical city shower, you roll on without fuss. Controls are intuitive, the deck surface stays grippy when wet, and there's no solid rear tyre waiting to betray you on a damp metal cover. The Horizon, by contrast, really prefers dry weather. Wet paint, drain covers and that solid rear wheel are not the happiest combination, and with no serious ingress protection rating claimed, you ride in the rain knowing you're asking a bit more of it than it was designed for.
If you regularly mix riding with public transport or micro-storage, the Horizon's folding party tricks are genuinely compelling. If your "practicality" means "it just works, even when the sky forgets how to behave," the Apollo Air fits more seamlessly into daily life.
Safety
Safety is not just brakes - though in this case, brakes do tell a big part of the story.
On braking alone, the Apollo Air is clearly ahead. Front drum plus carefully tuned regen gives you redundancy, shorter stopping distances, and better stability under hard deceleration. You can brake assertively on patchy surfaces without instantly locking the rear. The Horizon's rear-only system is robust and reliable, but it's fundamentally limited. At its relatively high cruising speed, you simply have less margin for unexpected obstacles, and on wet surfaces the solid rear tyre is quick to chirp and slide if you ask too much of it.
Lighting is a split decision. The Horizon actually has a decent spread of deck-mounted lights, good for being seen from multiple sides. The Apollo adds a higher-mounted headlight, which is better for projecting light down the road and for being noticed by drivers. In both cases, for proper night riding on unlit paths, you'll want an extra handlebar light; neither stock setup turns night into day.
Tyre grip and stability tilt strongly toward the Apollo. Those large, air-filled tyres and long contact patches deal far better with gravel, wet patches, and surprise potholes. Small, solid rear wheels are never a recipe for wet-weather confidence, and the Horizon is no exception: it's fine in the dry, cautiously manageable when roads are damp, and actively unhappy on painted lines in the rain.
Frame and cockpit stability once again favour the Apollo. At top speed, the Air feels composed. The Horizon is okay, but the combination of smaller wheels, a lighter front end and a more "budget" folding assembly means you're more aware of every wobble and gust of side wind.
From a pure safety standpoint, the Apollo Air is the scooter I'd hand to a new rider or a family member without worrying. The Horizon can be ridden safely, but it demands more skill, better anticipation, and a stricter self-imposed speed limit in bad conditions.
Community Feedback
| FLUID Horizon 2022 13Ah | APOLLO Air 2022 |
|---|---|
What riders love
|
What riders love
|
What riders complain about
|
What riders complain about
|
Price & Value
On pure euros-per-spec, the Horizon looks like the savvy buy. It costs noticeably less, while giving you stronger real-world range, punchier top-speed performance and that dense, fold-anywhere package. If your budget is tight and you want the maximum distance and speed for your money, it's hard to argue with what it offers on paper.
But value isn't just batteries and watts. The Apollo Air asks for a premium, and then quietly spends that money on things you can't summarise in a single spec line: a stiffer chassis, bigger tyres, proper dual braking, thoughtful ergonomics, proper water resistance, and a suspension system that genuinely saves your joints on bad surfaces. Over a year of daily commuting, those "intangibles" start to look very tangible indeed.
If you're counting every euro and your rides are mostly dry and straight, the Horizon gives you more sheer scooter for the money. If you view your scooter as a primary vehicle and care about how it feels and how safe it is, the Apollo's higher price starts to look more like an investment than an indulgence.
Service & Parts Availability
Both brands have better reputations than the typical anonymous imports, which is already a big plus.
Fluid Freeride is known for stocking parts and offering real support, especially in North America. The Horizon's platform has been around for years under different names, so generic spares - tyres, tubes for the front, generic controllers - are not hard to source if you're comfortable tinkering. In Europe, though, you may be relying more on third-party shops and your own wrenching skills than on a tightly integrated service network.
Apollo has built a more "brand-forward" ecosystem: official parts channels, app support, documentation and an active community. In Europe you'll likely be going through resellers or partners, but the fact that the hardware is proprietary means when something breaks, you usually know exactly what to order, and the design is less of a moving target than the typical OEM rebrand. That said, proprietary also means you're somewhat tied to Apollo's supply chain and pricing.
If you like the idea of a well-mapped ownership experience, the Apollo Air has the edge. If you're the kind of rider who's happy to hunt for compatible bits and DIY, the Horizon's more generic underpinnings aren't necessarily a downside - just don't expect the same level of hand-holding.
Pros & Cons Summary
| FLUID Horizon 2022 13Ah | APOLLO Air 2022 |
|---|---|
Pros
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
Cons
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | FLUID Horizon 2022 13Ah | APOLLO Air 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Motor rated power | 500 W rear hub | 500 W front hub |
| Top speed | ≈ 37 km/h | ≈ 32-35 km/h |
| Advertised range | ≈ 40 km | ≈ 50 km |
| Realistic range (mixed use) | ≈ 30-40 km | ≈ 30-37 km |
| Battery | 48 V 13 Ah (624 Wh) | 36 V 15 Ah (540 Wh) |
| Weight | 17,4 kg | 17,6 kg |
| Brakes | Rear drum + regen | Front drum + rear regen |
| Suspension | Front spring, rear hydraulic/spring | Front dual fork |
| Tyres | Front pneumatic 8,5", rear solid 8" | Front & rear pneumatic 10" |
| Max load | 120 kg | 100-120 kg |
| IP rating | Not specified | IP54 |
| Charging time | ≈ 6 h | ≈ 7-9 h |
| Price (approx.) | ≈ 805 € | ≈ 919 € |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
After living with both, the Apollo Air 2022 is the scooter I'd choose to ride daily, and the one I'd recommend to most people who ask "which one should I actually buy?". It's not the most exciting on paper, and it certainly isn't cheap, but it feels composed, safe, and grown-up in a way the Horizon just doesn't quite match. On rough roads, in dodgy weather, or at the end of a long day when your reactions aren't razor-sharp, that matters more than a few extra kilometres per hour.
The FLUID Horizon 2022 13Ah, though, is not without charm. If you're chasing the best range and speed for your money, ride mostly in the dry, and really need that ultra-compact fold, it still makes a lot of sense. It's the scrappy workhorse: a bit old-school, a bit rough at the edges, but capable if you ride within its limits and keep your wits about you.
If your priority list starts with comfort, safety and year-round daily use, the Apollo Air is the safer bet. If your list starts with "range, top speed, fits under my desk, don't want to overspend", the Horizon is still a competitive, if slightly dated, answer - just go in with eyes open about its compromises.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | FLUID Horizon 2022 13Ah | APOLLO Air 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ✅ 1,29 €/Wh | ❌ 1,70 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ✅ 21,76 €/km/h | ❌ 26,26 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ✅ 27,88 g/Wh | ❌ 32,59 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | ✅ 0,47 kg/km/h | ❌ 0,50 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ✅ 23,00 €/km | ❌ 27,45 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ✅ 0,50 kg/km | ❌ 0,53 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ❌ 17,83 Wh/km | ✅ 16,12 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ❌ 13,51 W/(km/h) | ✅ 14,29 W/(km/h) |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | Weight to power ratio (kg/W)✅ 0,035 kg/W | ✅ 0,035 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ✅ 104,00 W | ❌ 67,50 W |
These metrics strip the scooters back to pure maths: how much you pay for each unit of battery, speed and range; how heavy each Wh and km/h is; how efficiently they use their energy; and how fast they refill. The Horizon dominates the value-per-spec and charging-speed columns, while the Apollo claws back wins only where its slightly lower top speed makes each watt work a bit harder.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | FLUID Horizon 2022 13Ah | APOLLO Air 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ✅ Slightly lighter, better handle | ❌ Slightly heavier, bulkier feel |
| Range | ✅ Goes further per charge | ❌ Shorter real range |
| Max Speed | ✅ Higher cruising headroom | ❌ More conservative top end |
| Power | ✅ Punchier feel overall | ❌ Feels more restrained |
| Battery Size | ✅ Larger capacity pack | ❌ Smaller battery overall |
| Suspension | ❌ Rear harsh on big hits | ✅ Front fork works brilliantly |
| Design | ❌ Functional, a bit dated | ✅ Clean, integrated, modern |
| Safety | ❌ Single brake, solid rear tyre | ✅ Dual brakes, better grip |
| Practicality | ✅ Super-compact fold, easy stash | ❌ Wide, awkward when folded |
| Comfort | ❌ Solid rear, small wheels | ✅ Plush, forgiving ride |
| Features | ❌ Basic, no app extras | ✅ App, regen control, niceties |
| Serviceability | ✅ Generic parts, easy sourcing | ❌ More proprietary hardware |
| Customer Support | ✅ Solid brand, decent backing | ✅ Strong brand, good support |
| Fun Factor | ✅ Faster, livelier character | ❌ Calmer, more sensible feel |
| Build Quality | ❌ Feels more "platform based" | ✅ Stiffer, more premium build |
| Component Quality | ❌ Functional but unremarkable | ✅ Better hardware, finishing |
| Brand Name | ❌ Smaller global presence | ✅ Stronger recognition, image |
| Community | ✅ Mature platform knowledge | ✅ Big, active brand community |
| Lights (visibility) | ✅ Good deck-level presence | ❌ Less side visibility stock |
| Lights (illumination) | ❌ Low, weak for dark paths | ✅ Higher mount, slightly better |
| Acceleration | ✅ Sharper initial punch | ❌ Smoother, but less urgent |
| Arrive with smile factor | ✅ Faster, playful personality | ❌ More sensible than exciting |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ❌ Harsher, more demanding | ✅ Calm, low-stress ride |
| Charging speed | ✅ Fills noticeably faster | ❌ Slower full recharge |
| Reliability | ✅ Simple, proven platform | ✅ Solid, mature design |
| Folded practicality | ✅ Tiny footprint, easy stash | ❌ Long and wide when folded |
| Ease of transport | ✅ Better handle, compact size | ❌ Awkward to carry through |
| Handling | ❌ Twitchier, small-wheel feel | ✅ Stable, confidence-inspiring |
| Braking performance | ❌ Single rear, longer stops | ✅ Dual-system, more control |
| Riding position | ✅ Adjustable stem, rear footrest | ✅ Spacious deck, good ergonomics |
| Handlebar quality | ❌ Narrow, more basic feel | ✅ Wide, solid, confidence |
| Throttle response | ❌ Some lag and dead zone | ✅ Smooth, well-tuned curve |
| Dashboard/Display | ❌ Functional, nothing special | ✅ Neat, integrated display |
| Security (locking) | ✅ Compact, easier to lock frame | ❌ More awkward shape to lock |
| Weather protection | ❌ No proper rating, cautious | ✅ IP54, happier in rain |
| Resale value | ❌ Less brand-driven demand | ✅ Stronger second-hand appeal |
| Tuning potential | ✅ Common platform, mods easy | ❌ More closed, app-focused |
| Ease of maintenance | ✅ Simple drum, solid rear tyre | ❌ Tubes, proprietary parts |
| Value for Money | ✅ More range and speed cheaper | ❌ Higher price for refinement |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the FLUID Horizon 2022 13Ah scores 8 points against the APOLLO Air 2022's 3. In the Author's Category Battle, the FLUID Horizon 2022 13Ah gets 22 ✅ versus 21 ✅ for APOLLO Air 2022 (with a few ties sprinkled in).
Totals: FLUID Horizon 2022 13Ah scores 30, APOLLO Air 2022 scores 24.
Based on the scoring, the FLUID Horizon 2022 13Ah is our overall winner. In everyday traffic, the Apollo Air 2022 is the scooter that feels like a trustworthy partner rather than a toy you're slightly out-riding. It's calmer, more comfortable, and gives you that subtle sense of security that makes you relax and actually enjoy the commute. The FLUID Horizon 2022 13Ah fights back with better numbers and a cheekier character, but it never quite shakes the feeling that you're trading away a bit too much polish and safety for the deal. If you want the scooter that will quietly look after you day in, day out, the Apollo is the one that genuinely earns its spot by the front door.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.

