Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
The GOTRAX GMAX Ultra takes the overall win here thanks to its far superior real-world range and better value for money, especially if your commute is genuinely long and you hate charging. The Apollo Air 2022 fights back with a much more forgiving ride and nicer overall refinement, but its range and price-to-battery ratio make it harder to justify if you're clocking serious daily kilometres.
Pick the GMAX Ultra if your priority is going far with minimal fuss and you have lifts or ground-floor storage. Choose the Apollo Air if you ride on rough city surfaces, care more about comfort and handling than distance, and your trips are moderate in length. Both will do the job; only one really makes sense for heavy commuters.
If you want the full story - including which one will leave your knees or your wallet more bruised - keep reading.
Electric scooters have reached that mildly confusing stage where two very different machines can cost roughly the same yet claim to do "daily commuting" equally well. The Apollo Air 2022 and the GOTRAX GMAX Ultra are a perfect example of this split personality: one is a comfort-focused "premium commuter", the other is a range-obsessed workhorse that looks like it secretly trains for marathons at night.
I've ridden both over plenty of boring bike lanes, annoying cobblestones and a deeply unglamorous number of supermarket runs. On paper, they live in the same general price bracket, use similar voltage systems, and top out at broadly similar speeds. On the road, they approach your commute with very different priorities.
If you're torn between pampering your spine or pampering your range anxiety, this comparison will help you decide which compromise hurts less.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
Both scooters live in that "serious but not insane" commuter category: single-motor, mid-range price, sensible top speeds and enough battery to cover a typical city routine without constant outlet hunting.
The Apollo Air 2022 is aimed at riders who want a noticeably plusher ride and nicer finishing touches. Think of it as the scooter for people who've had enough of rattly rentals and want something that feels more like a small vehicle than a toy.
The GOTRAX GMAX Ultra targets the practical commuter who measures life in kilometres per charge. It's for riders who'd rather charge twice a week than every night, and who can live without suspension as long as the scooter just keeps going.
Why compare them? Because if you can afford one, you can likely afford the other, and the choice boils down to a simple but painful question: comfort now, or range later?
Design & Build Quality
Put them side by side and the design philosophies are obvious.
The Apollo Air feels like a sculpted commuter: single-piece frame, tidy cable routing, and a front end that looks like someone actually cared about aesthetics rather than just bolting things on. The finish is clean, the deck rubber mat feels well thought out, and the wide handlebars make it look a bit more serious than your average rental scooter.
The GMAX Ultra, in contrast, looks like a chunky urban tool. The frame is beefy, the deck is generously wide, and the integrated lock in the stem is a very "I'm going to work, not to Instagram" touch. Cabling is mostly hidden, and the flush display on the stem gives it a surprisingly modern face for what is otherwise a pretty utilitarian machine.
In the hands, both feel solid, but in slightly different ways. The Apollo feels more refined: fewer visible fasteners, a bit more attention to fit and finish, and a folding mechanism that, while not the most ergonomic, produces a nicely rigid stem once locked. The GMAX Ultra feels heavier and more tank-like; the folding latch is confidence-inspiring, though some bits (like the rear fender hook) feel cheaper than the rest of the chassis.
If you prefer something that looks and feels more "designed", the Apollo edges ahead. If your heart warms to anything that feels like it would survive a minor apocalypse, the GMAX Ultra will speak your language.
Ride Comfort & Handling
This is where the two scooters stop being polite and start being very different.
The Apollo Air has one big trick: proper front suspension. Combine that with large, air-filled tyres and you get a ride that is unusually cushy for this class. Cracked asphalt, expansion joints, mildly neglected bike lanes - the Air shrugs off the buzz and sharp hits in a way the GMAX simply can't. After several kilometres of ugly city pavement, I still stepped off the Air feeling fairly fresh.
The GMAX Ultra relies entirely on its pneumatic tyres and weight for comfort. On good or average tarmac, that's actually fine; it has a calm, planted feel and rolls smoothly. But once you hit cobblestones, rough patches or pothole-heavy suburbs, you are the suspension. Your knees, ankles and wrists will remember every shortcut you took across broken ground.
Handling is another clear split. The Apollo's wide bars and relatively modest weight give it a nimble but stable feel. Quick dodges around pedestrians or potholes are easy, and the front suspension helps the wheel track the surface mid-corner instead of skipping sideways.
The GMAX Ultra feels more like a long-wheelbase cruiser. It's steady, predictable and happy going straight at commuting speeds, but it doesn't exactly invite playful carving. In tight spaces or when threading between obstacles, you're always aware of the bulk under you.
If your city serves you a lot of rough surfaces, the Apollo saves your joints and your patience. If your roads are mostly smooth and you value straight-line stability more than finesse, the GMAX Ultra is acceptable - but never truly "comfortable" in the same way.
Performance
On the performance front, neither scooter is a rocket ship - and that's fine; they're commuters, not stunt props.
The Apollo Air's motor has a bit more nominal grunt on paper, and you do feel that extra shove off the line. It pulls cleanly up to its top-speed territory and handles moderate hills without dramatic slowdowns, especially with average-weight riders. Acceleration is nicely linear; you don't get the on/off jerkiness that cheap controllers often deliver, which makes low-speed manoeuvring more relaxed.
The GMAX Ultra's rear hub motor is humbler on spec but reasonably tuned. Being rear-driven helps; when you accelerate, your weight naturally loads the rear, giving decent traction and a planted feel. It gets up to its capped speed at a sensible pace, not thrilling but not painfully sluggish either. On flat ground it cruises happily; on steeper hills, it starts to show its limits, especially with heavier riders - expect a committed but slightly wheezy effort rather than a confident surge.
At speed, the Apollo feels more agile and a bit more eager, while the GMAX Ultra feels heavier and more "cruise control" in character. Neither feels sketchy at their top speeds, but I felt more in command on the Apollo when weaving through busier traffic.
Braking is one of the more interesting contrasts. The Apollo's combo of front drum and rear regenerative braking is very commuter-friendly: low maintenance, consistent in the wet, and the regen lever lets you modulate deceleration smoothly without constantly abusing the mechanical system. The GMAX Ultra counters with a rear disc and front electronic brake; it has more bite when you really yank the lever, but the setup demands slightly more maintenance and can feel a touch less refined in modulation.
Overall, the Apollo wins for feel and responsiveness; the GMAX Ultra gets a passing grade for competence, with no major drama - just less sparkle.
Battery & Range
Here is where the tables turn hard.
The Apollo Air's battery is perfectly adequate for typical city use: realistic ranges in the low-to-mid double digits depending on rider weight, speed and terrain. For many people - home to office, detour via supermarket, back home - that's absolutely fine. But if your daily loop starts edging into long-distance territory, you'll be watching that battery gauge more often than you'd like. You can do a solid day of commuting, but you're likely charging every night or every other night.
The GMAX Ultra, on the other hand, has one clear mission: banish range anxiety from your vocabulary. Its larger pack with branded cells delivers genuinely long real-world distances. Even riding briskly, hitting hills and not exactly babying the throttle, you can pull off commutes that would make the Apollo start sweating. For many users, that means charging just a couple of times a week.
There are trade-offs, of course. The Apollo's smaller pack means slightly longer charge times per Wh, and it does show more noticeable drop-off in punch as the battery dips towards the bottom. The GMAX's big pack needs a decent chunk of time to refill, so a full charge is a clear overnight affair - but you need to do it less often, which is the whole point.
If you're the kind of rider whose "short ride" quietly adds up to dozens of kilometres, the GMAX Ultra simply plays in a different league. The Apollo is fine for typical commutes; the GMAX Ultra is built for people who keep discovering new excuses not to stop riding.
Portability & Practicality
Both scooters are firmly in the "you can carry them, but you won't enjoy it" category.
The Apollo Air, despite its "Air" name, is not exactly floaty. Carrying it up a single flight of stairs is doable; multiple flights every day quickly becomes your accidental fitness regime. The non-folding handlebars also mean the folded package is long and wide - awkward on crowded trains and narrow corridors.
The GMAX Ultra ups the weight further. The folding geometry is fairly compact lengthwise, but the mass is the real issue. Lifting it into a car boot is fine; lugging it up several floors of stairs is a special kind of punishment. If your commute involves significant walking while carrying the scooter, neither is ideal - but the GMAX Ultra is definitely the one that makes you reconsider life choices first.
In everyday "roll it, park it, use it" practicality, both are decent. The Apollo's kickstand is solid enough and its IP rating lets you survive light rain without panic. The GMAX Ultra's integrated cable lock is genuinely handy for quick café or shop stops and its own IP rating is similarly commute-proof, though not flood-proof.
If you rely heavily on public transport and stairs, the Apollo just barely scrapes into "tolerable with willpower". The GMAX Ultra is happier in lift-equipped buildings and ground-floor storage - it's a scooter you roll everywhere, not one you casually shoulder.
Safety
Safety on both scooters is more "sensible commuter" than "heroic engineering", but there are some important nuances.
The Apollo Air scores with its braking setup and front suspension. The drum-plus-regen combo is low on fuss yet gives consistent, controlled stops, even when roads are wet or filthy. The front suspension helps the wheel keep contact under braking on rougher surfaces, which does wonders for stability. Tyres are big and air-filled, giving a confident contact patch and decent grip.
The GMAX Ultra's disc-plus-electronic front braking arrangement has more brute stopping power but is a bit more ordinary in refinement. Still, it's entirely adequate for the performance level. The tyres are again large and pneumatic, and the longer wheelbase plus hefty deck battery make it feel very stable in straight lines and predictable in emergency stops.
Lighting is one place where the GMAX Ultra has a small but useful edge. Its headlight is more usable for actually seeing the road, whereas the Apollo's stock light is more about being seen than lighting unlit paths. In both cases, if you ride a lot at night on dark routes, you'll want an additional bar or helmet light.
Stability-wise, the Apollo wins in tricky urban situations thanks to that front suspension and wide bars; the GMAX Ultra feels safe, but it wants nice tarmac and calm steering inputs more than sudden swerves.
Community Feedback
| Apollo Air 2022 | GOTRAX GMAX Ultra |
|---|---|
What riders love
|
What riders love
|
What riders complain about
|
What riders complain about
|
Price & Value
Value is where the GMAX Ultra quietly pulls ahead.
The Apollo Air sits at the premium end of single-motor commuters for what it offers. You get nicer ride quality, app integration and brand polish, but you pay a noticeable premium for a battery that's not especially large for this price band. If your daily mileage is modest and you really care about comfort, that can still make sense.
The GMAX Ultra comes in cheaper while offering a chunkier battery with branded cells and a very strong distance-per-euro proposition. You don't get suspension and the overall feel is more functional than polished, but in terms of how much practical transport you get for your money, it's hard to argue with. Especially when it's on sale - which it often is - the value calculus becomes pretty one-sided.
If we strip away feelings and just look at what you get for your cash in terms of transport capability, the GMAX Ultra offers the stronger deal. The Apollo justifies itself only if ride comfort and brand refinement sit high on your personal priority list.
Service & Parts Availability
Apollo has done a decent job building a support network, with an active community and reasonably good access to parts, particularly in North America and increasingly through European partners. Documentation and guides are relatively clear, and there's enough online discussion to troubleshoot most non-catastrophic issues.
GOTRAX, being a volume seller, stocks parts quite well and makes them easy to order, which is a big plus. Their historic weak spot has been customer service consistency; some riders report smooth warranty experiences, others less so. The trend, however, seems to be improving as they mature as a brand.
In Europe, neither is as bulletproof as the biggest "household" names, but both are far ahead of nameless white-label scooters. The Apollo feels slightly more "enthusiast brand" with a vocal community, the GMAX Ultra feels more like a mass-market product with decent parts flow and a bit more variability in support quality.
Pros & Cons Summary
| Apollo Air 2022 | GOTRAX GMAX Ultra |
|---|---|
Pros
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
Cons
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | Apollo Air 2022 | GOTRAX GMAX Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Motor power (rated) | 500 W front hub | 350 W rear hub (500 W peak) |
| Top speed | ca. 32-35 km/h | ca. 32 km/h |
| Advertised range | ca. 50 km | ca. 72 km |
| Realistic range (mixed riding) | ca. 30-37 km | ca. 40-50 km |
| Battery | 36 V 15 Ah (540 Wh) | 36 V 17,5 Ah (630 Wh, LG) |
| Weight | 17,6 kg | 20,9 kg |
| Brakes | Front drum + rear regen | Front electronic + rear disc |
| Suspension | Front dual fork | None |
| Tyres | 10" pneumatic | 10" pneumatic |
| Max load | ca. 100-120 kg | 100 kg |
| IP rating | IP54 | IP54 |
| Charging time | ca. 7-9 h | ca. 6 h |
| Approx. price | 919 € | 763 € |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
If you strip away the marketing slogans, the decision is surprisingly straightforward.
The Apollo Air 2022 is the better choice if your daily riding happens on less-than-perfect surfaces, your commute distance is moderate, and you put ride comfort above everything else. The front suspension genuinely makes a difference, the handling is friendly yet stable, and the whole package feels a bit more refined. It's the scooter you pick if you want your commute to feel soft and controlled rather than just "efficient enough".
The GOTRAX GMAX Ultra, however, is the scooter that makes more sense for most serious commuters. The range is simply in another category, the price is lower, and the stability plus big-name battery cells give you the sort of practical reliability that matters when this isn't a toy but your main way of getting around. You give up suspension and a bit of finesse, and you accept a heavy chassis - but in exchange you get a scooter that just keeps going.
If your rides are shorter and your roads are rough, the Apollo is the more pleasant companion. If you regularly rack up long distances and care more about getting there and back without thinking about the charger than you do about pampering your wrists, the GMAX Ultra is the more rational pick - and, in this matchup, the overall winner.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | Apollo Air 2022 | GOTRAX GMAX Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ❌ 1,70 €/Wh | ✅ 1,21 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ❌ 27,03 €/km/h | ✅ 23,84 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ✅ 32,59 g/Wh | ❌ 33,17 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | ✅ 0,52 kg/km/h | ❌ 0,65 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ❌ 27,03 €/km | ✅ 16,96 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ❌ 0,52 kg/km | ✅ 0,46 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ❌ 15,88 Wh/km | ✅ 14,00 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ✅ 14,71 W/km/h | ❌ 10,94 W/km/h |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | ✅ 0,0352 kg/W | ❌ 0,0597 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ❌ 67,5 W | ✅ 105,0 W |
These metrics are a purely mathematical way of comparing how efficiently each scooter turns money, mass, power and energy into speed and distance. Lower cost-per-Wh or cost-per-kilometre values mean more "transport" for each euro spent. Weight-related ratios show how much scooter you are hauling around for a given performance or range. Wh per km is about energy efficiency, while power-to-speed and weight-to-power say how strong or "overpowered" a scooter is for its top speed. Average charging speed simply tells you how quickly energy flows back into the battery.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | Apollo Air 2022 | GOTRAX GMAX Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ✅ Noticeably lighter to haul | ❌ Heavy lump to carry |
| Range | ❌ Fine, but not impressive | ✅ Real long-distance commuter |
| Max Speed | ✅ Slightly higher ceiling | ❌ Capped a bit lower |
| Power | ✅ Stronger rated motor | ❌ Modest, just adequate |
| Battery Size | ❌ Smaller pack | ✅ Bigger LG battery |
| Suspension | ✅ Proper front suspension | ❌ No suspension at all |
| Design | ✅ More refined, cohesive | ❌ Chunky, more utilitarian |
| Safety | ✅ Suspension aids stability | ❌ Stable but harsher |
| Practicality | ❌ Less range, awkward bars | ✅ Range and lock convenience |
| Comfort | ✅ Clearly smoother, cushier | ❌ Vibrates on rough roads |
| Features | ✅ App, regen throttle | ❌ Fewer useful extras |
| Serviceability | ✅ Active community help | ❌ More basic ecosystem |
| Customer Support | ✅ Generally more premium | ❌ Historically mixed |
| Fun Factor | ✅ Livelier, more playful | ❌ Steady but a bit dull |
| Build Quality | ✅ More refined structure | ❌ Feels tougher, less refined |
| Component Quality | ✅ Nicely chosen commuter parts | ✅ LG cells, solid basics |
| Brand Name | ✅ Strong enthusiast reputation | ❌ More budget association |
| Community | ✅ Active, engaged riders | ✅ Large, mainstream base |
| Lights (visibility) | ❌ Headlight mainly to be seen | ✅ Better for night use |
| Lights (illumination) | ❌ Weak on dark paths | ✅ Usable stock beam |
| Acceleration | ✅ Stronger, zippier pull | ❌ Adequate but milder |
| Arrive with smile factor | ✅ Plush, engaging ride | ❌ Competent, less character |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ✅ Suspension saves your body | ❌ Rough roads tire you |
| Charging speed | ❌ Slower for its size | ✅ Faster per Wh |
| Reliability | ✅ Solid, proven platform | ✅ Tank-like, simple design |
| Folded practicality | ❌ Wide bars, awkward latch | ✅ Secure, compact fold |
| Ease of transport | ✅ Lighter, slightly easier | ❌ Heavy for stairs |
| Handling | ✅ Nimble, stable steering | ❌ More slow, cruiser-like |
| Braking performance | ✅ Smooth dual-system braking | ❌ Strong but less refined |
| Riding position | ✅ Comfortable, well-balanced | ✅ Spacious deck, relaxed |
| Handlebar quality | ✅ Wide, confidence-inspiring | ❌ Functional, less premium |
| Throttle response | ✅ Linear, nicely tuned | ❌ Safe, slightly bland |
| Dashboard/Display | ✅ Clean, integrated look | ✅ Flush, modern stem display |
| Security (locking) | ❌ Needs separate lock | ✅ Built-in cable lock |
| Weather protection | ✅ IP rating and sealed drum | ✅ IP rating, simple layout |
| Resale value | ✅ Holds value reasonably | ❌ More discount-driven |
| Tuning potential | ✅ App-based behaviour tweaks | ❌ Very limited options |
| Ease of maintenance | ✅ Drum brake, fewer headaches | ✅ Simple, parts easy to source |
| Value for Money | ❌ Comfort-focused, pricey | ✅ Strong range-per-euro |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the APOLLO Air 2022 scores 4 points against the GOTRAX GMAX Ultra's 6. In the Author's Category Battle, the APOLLO Air 2022 gets 30 ✅ versus 16 ✅ for GOTRAX GMAX Ultra (with a few ties sprinkled in).
Totals: APOLLO Air 2022 scores 34, GOTRAX GMAX Ultra scores 22.
Based on the scoring, the APOLLO Air 2022 is our overall winner. Between these two, the GOTRAX GMAX Ultra ultimately feels like the more sensible partner for real-world commuting, simply because it lets you ride further, worry less about charging and still gives you a stable, no-nonsense platform. The Apollo Air 2022 is undeniably nicer to ride and easier on the body, but its shorter legs and higher price make it more of a comfort indulgence than a pure commuter tool. If your roads are rough and your trips short, the Apollo will make every ride feel that bit more civilised. If your life is measured in long daily kilometres and you just want a scooter that quietly gets on with the job, the GMAX Ultra is the one that makes more day-to-day sense.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.

