Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
The NIU KQi2 Pro edges out the Apollo Air 2022 as the better overall buy for most riders, mainly because it delivers very solid build quality, smart electronics and excellent value at a noticeably lower price. It feels like a sensibly engineered, no-drama commuter that just works, day after day, without asking for much in return. The Apollo Air 2022 strikes back with a much more comfortable, suspension-equipped ride and stronger real-world performance, but you pay quite a bit more for the privilege.
Pick the Apollo if comfort and a cushier, more confident ride over rough city surfaces matter more to you than saving money or a bit of weight. Choose the NIU if you want a sturdy, modern, app-connected workhorse that's kinder to your wallet and still more than capable for everyday commuting. Keep reading - the devil is in the details, and these two trade blows in more places than you might expect.
Stick around for the full comparison and by the end you'll know exactly which compromises you're willing to live with.
There's a strange no-man's-land in the scooter world between the cheap, rattly "first scooters" and the hulking, dual-motor land missiles. The Apollo Air 2022 and NIU KQi2 Pro both live right in that awkward middle ground: grown-up enough to be real daily transport, but not quite exciting enough to make your friends jealous at the pub.
I've put plenty of kilometres on both, in the usual urban mix of patchy tarmac, wet leaves, tram tracks and the occasional overly ambitious curb hop. They're closer competitors than their price tags suggest: one comes in dressed as a "premium commuter", the other as the budget hero that wants to make expensive brands look silly.
The Apollo Air 2022 is for riders who want a plush, forgiving ride and don't mind paying extra to save their knees. The NIU KQi2 Pro is for riders who value a sensible price, solid engineering and don't lose sleep over lacking suspension or monster specs. Let's see where each one shines - and where the marketing gloss rubs off.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
On paper, these scooters sit in different price brackets: the Apollo Air 2022 plays at the high end of the "serious commuter" class, while the NIU KQi2 Pro sneaks in as a budget-minded alternative that still claims grown-up credentials. In real use, though, they target the same rider: someone doing daily city trips of roughly ten to fifteen kilometres each way, mostly on roads and cycle paths, with the occasional slope and dodgy surface thrown in.
Neither is built to drag race hyper scooters or jump stair sets. Both are meant to replace short car rides and public transport, and to feel like transport rather than a toy. You're probably weighing: "Should I pay more for comfort and a slightly stronger scooter, or stick to something cheaper that's just competent enough?" That's exactly the trade-off between these two.
Design & Build Quality
In the flesh, both scooters look more mature than their price segments usually allow - no visible rats' nest of cables, no toy-shop plastic. But they approach "premium" from different angles.
The Apollo Air 2022 feels very much like a design exercise from a scooter-first company: a thick, confidence-inspiring stem, nicely sculpted single-piece frame and a clean, integrated display. The cables are tucked away, the grey finish is tasteful, and the rubberised deck looks properly modern and is easy to wipe down after a muddy day. It gives off a "mini real vehicle" vibe, even if some touches - like the somewhat stiff, low-set latch - remind you this isn't a luxury product.
The NIU KQi2 Pro comes from a brand with moped DNA, and that shows. The frame feels dense and "moped-ish", with good internal cable routing and a very solid neck area. The signature halo headlight and the angled front section make it instantly recognisable. The deck uses classic grip tape, which looks sporty but ages less gracefully than the Apollo's rubber mat unless you're a cleaning enthusiast. Still, the whole scooter feels like a single, cohesive unit - no squeaks, no obvious corners cut.
Side by side, the Apollo looks a bit sleeker and more refined, while the NIU looks tougher and more industrial. In the hands, the Apollo feels slightly more polished ergonomically, but the NIU gives that "this thing will survive abuse" impression. Neither is truly premium in a high-end sense, but both are well above your usual budget clunker.
Ride Comfort & Handling
This is where their personalities really separate. If your city is paved by people who clearly hate cyclists, the Apollo Air 2022 is the more forgiving partner. The front fork suspension, combined with large air-filled tyres, does a genuinely good job of filtering typical urban nonsense: cracked asphalt, expansion joints, small potholes, those charming sunken drain covers that appear exactly where you want to ride. After five or six kilometres of rougher sections, my wrists and knees were still surprisingly fresh. You can stand slightly lazier, let the front end do some of the work, and it flatters less-than-perfect riding technique.
The NIU KQi2 Pro, with no mechanical suspension at all, relies entirely on its big tubeless tyres and your knees. On decent tarmac and well-laid paving, it's fine - more than fine, actually, thanks to the generous handlebars and stable geometry. But stretch your commute over patchwork roads or cobblestones and you start feeling every bit of that simplicity. It's not brutal, but over time you notice more buzz through your legs and hands than on the Apollo. I found myself actively scanning for smoother lines much more on the NIU.
Handling is interesting: both use reasonably wide bars, but the NIU's feel even broader and give oodles of leverage. At its modest top speed that translates into easy, lazy steering - great for beginners. The Apollo, while also very stable, adds the benefit of that planted, suspended front which keeps the wheel tracking the ground through mid-corner bumps. If you ride fast on scruffy cycle lanes, the Apollo simply feels more composed. In short: comfort crown to Apollo, benign stability crown to NIU.
Performance
Neither of these scooters is going to rearrange your shoulders when you touch the throttle, but there are clear differences in how they deliver what they've got.
The Apollo Air 2022 has the more muscular setup on paper and it feels that way on the road. Setting off from lights, it accelerates with enough urgency to leave rental scooters and pushbikes behind without feeling like it wants to kill you. At its top cruising speed you're nudging the upper edge of what's sensible in most bike lanes, and it feels stable enough there that you don't clench every time you hit a bump. On moderate hills, the Apollo holds speed surprisingly well; you definitely notice the extra grunt when climbing longer urban ramps or bridges.
The NIU KQi2 Pro is more modest but also more honest. Throttle response is smooth and, by design, a little lethargic off the line - there's a small delay and you have to push off first, which safety engineers love and impatient riders curse when starting uphill. Once rolling, though, it gets to its limited top speed with calm determination rather than drama. On flat ground it hums along just fast enough to keep up with typical city cycling traffic. On hills it copes, but you feel it working; heavier riders will see speed drop noticeably on anything beyond gentle inclines.
Braking is closer than you'd think: both use a front drum paired with rear regenerative braking. On both scooters, the regen is tuned well enough that, around town, you can do a surprising amount of slowing just with your thumb, saving the mechanical brake for harder stops. The Apollo's front end feels a bit more composed if you really lean on it - that suspension again - but the NIU's brake setup is extremely predictable. Neither system is spectacular, but both are reassuring, and importantly, low-maintenance.
Battery & Range
On a typical mixed urban commute - riding briskly, not babying the throttle, with a normal-sized adult on board - the Apollo Air 2022 simply goes further. Its battery is chunkier and that shows in real life. I could do a decently long round trip at near top speed with a little margin left in the tank, provided I didn't spend the whole day sprinting up steep hills. It's not long-distance tourer territory, but it's comfortably into "don't really have to think about range during the day" for many commuters.
The NIU KQi2 Pro is more modest in absolute range, but it's still perfectly adequate for sane urban distances. Expect to be solidly in one-charge-per-day territory for most people. What it does well is consistency: thanks to its higher-voltage system and NIU's battery management, it holds close to its top speed until the battery is getting genuinely low, rather than gradually turning into a sluggish cart halfway through the pack. You just don't go as far before you get the hint to plug in.
Charging times are similar on paper and similarly unexciting in reality - think overnight or during office hours. Neither offers particularly fast replenishment. The Apollo's larger pack logically takes a bit longer to refill fully; the NIU, with its smaller battery, finishes a bit sooner. In practice, for normal commuting patterns, both are "charge while you sleep or work" devices rather than "grab a quick top-up over lunch" machines.
If you're doing longer city loops or want more margin for spontaneous detours, the Apollo is the easier one to live with. If your daily ride is relatively short and predictable, the NIU' s smaller battery simply saves money and weight.
Portability & Practicality
Both scooters fall into that slightly awkward category of "technically portable, practically a bit of a hassle" once stairs enter the equation.
The Apollo Air 2022, despite the "Air" name, is not a feather. Carrying it up a couple of flights is fine; more than that and you start rethinking life choices or searching the building for a hidden lift. The folding mechanism is sturdy and gives a solid ride with zero noticeable wobble, but it's mounted low and needs a proper bend-down moment to engage. The handlebars don't fold, so the folded package is long and wide - fine for a hallway or car boot, a bit annoying on crowded trains or under tiny desks.
The NIU KQi2 Pro is no ballerina either - if anything, it's slightly heavier. However, the folding motion feels marginally more straightforward: one latch, one safety catch, fold, hook to the rear. Once folded, the balance point is decent enough that short carries are more manageable than the raw weight suggests. The bars also stay fixed, so again, the folded profile is more "flat surfboard" than "compact origami". For tight domestic storage the NIU doesn't magically solve the problem, but it's easier to live with if you're folding and unfolding multiple times a day.
In daily use, both offer the usual commuter conveniences: kickstands that actually hold the scooter up, decent water resistance for light rain, and app connectivity for tweaking regen and basic settings. NIU's app is a touch more polished and also adds a basic electronic lock, which is handy for quick coffee stops - not a theft-proof system by any means, but an extra layer of annoyance for opportunists.
Safety
Safety is one area where both brands clearly took notes from the horror stories of early, cheap scooters.
The Apollo Air 2022 scores most of its safety points through stability and control. The combination of big tyres, front suspension and wide bars makes it feel composed even at its top speed. The dual braking, with smooth regen and a robust front drum, gives controlled, predictable stops rather than the "grabby then nothing" behaviour you sometimes see on cheaper setups. The lights are... acceptable. The front beam will get you seen, but if you regularly ride unlit paths at night, an additional clip-on light is highly recommended.
The NIU KQi2 Pro takes a more "automotive" approach. The halo headlight is genuinely excellent by commuter-scooter standards: much brighter and better focused than most stock units in this price class. Add the rear light that brightens under braking and properly integrated reflectors, and you've got better visibility straight out of the box. The wide bar gives great leverage at its modest top speed, and the low, stable deck helps beginners feel at ease quickly.
Both share that low-maintenance drum-plus-regen braking combo, which I consider a solid choice for real commuters who don't want to fiddle with pad alignment every other weekend. At speed, the Apollo has the edge in overall stability thanks to its suspension and slightly stronger performance envelope; at night, the NIU clearly wins on lighting and visibility.
Community Feedback
| Apollo Air 2022 | NIU KQi2 Pro |
|---|---|
| What riders love | What riders love |
| Ultra-smooth ride from suspension and big tyres; very solid, rattle-free chassis; smooth regenerative braking with a dedicated thumb lever; clean, "grown up" design; wide handlebars and stable geometry at higher speed; app tuning for acceleration and braking; low mechanical maintenance; decent water resistance; easy-to-clean rubber deck. | "Tank-like" solidity and lack of rattles; tubeless tyres for comfort and fewer flats; excellent halo headlight and visibility; low-maintenance brake setup; very wide handlebars and stable handling; polished app with locking and OTA updates; long warranty for the price; smooth regen braking; stylish, non-generic look; good water resistance. |
| What riders complain about | What riders complain about |
| Heavier than the name suggests; awkward, low-mounted folding latch; stock headlight too weak for dark paths; wide bars make tight doorways tricky; fiddly valve access; kickstand angle on uneven ground; speed unlocking via app confusing at first; noticeable performance drop when battery gets low; price sitting at the top of its segment. | Heavier than many expect at this price; mandatory kick-to-start annoys experienced riders; long-ish charging time; slight throttle delay; struggles more on steep hills, especially with heavier riders; no suspension for very rough surfaces; low deck can scrape on high curbs; occasional app/Bluetooth quirks; some wish for a bit more speed. |
Price & Value
Here's where things become very pragmatic. The Apollo Air 2022 sits in the "nearly a thousand euro" ballpark. For that money you get a comfortable ride, suspension, a larger battery and a well-finished chassis from a scooter-focused brand with decent support. You also get the sense that you've paid for refinement: fewer rattles, better ergonomics, and a less fatiguing commute. But in cold economic terms, it isn't a screaming bargain; you're firmly in the territory where some riders will look at the spec sheet and shrug.
The NIU KQi2 Pro, by contrast, is priced much closer to mainstream "first scooter" money. And this is where it becomes hard to ignore: it delivers most of the build solidity, smart electronics and daily usability of more expensive models at a price that leaves a lot more change in your pocket. You sacrifice suspension and some power and range, but if your commute is typical city terrain rather than a war zone, that compromise starts to look quite reasonable.
Strip away the marketing and you end up with this: the Apollo gives you a nicer ride and more headroom, but you pay dearly for it. The NIU gives you enough performance for most people and feels properly built, at a price that's frankly kinder than it needs to be. On pure value, the NIU wins by a comfortable margin.
Service & Parts Availability
Apollo, being a scooter-focused brand, has done a decent job building an ecosystem around its products, especially in North America and to a lesser extent in Europe. Parts are available, documentation is improving, and the community is active enough that most issues have already been discovered and discussed. But depending on where you live in Europe, you might still find yourself dealing with a mixture of local partners and remote support, which can be a bit hit and miss.
NIU, on the other hand, leverages its broader presence in electric mopeds. In many European cities you can actually walk into a NIU dealership or partner shop, which for a scooter at this price is unusual. Parts availability tends to be better through that network, and warranty handling is generally straightforward. Community-wise, NIU has a growing base of KQi owners, but it's the brand's overall scale and dealer footprint that really help here.
So while Apollo's support is better than many "white label" brands, NIU's existing infrastructure gives it the edge for European riders who don't want every fix to turn into a logistics project.
Pros & Cons Summary
| Apollo Air 2022 | NIU KQi2 Pro |
|---|---|
Pros
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
Cons
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | Apollo Air 2022 | NIU KQi2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Motor power (rated) | 500 W front hub | 300 W rear hub |
| Top speed | ca. 32-35 km/h | ca. 28 km/h |
| Advertised range | 50 km | 40 km |
| Real-world range (mixed use) | ca. 30-37 km | ca. 25-30 km |
| Battery | 36 V, 15 Ah (540 Wh) | 48 V, 7,6 Ah (365 Wh) |
| Weight | 17,6 kg | 18,7 kg |
| Brakes | Front drum + rear regenerative | Front drum + rear regenerative |
| Suspension | Front dual-fork | None |
| Tyres | 10" pneumatic (tubed) | 10" pneumatic tubeless |
| Max load | 100-120 kg | 100 kg |
| IP rating | IP54 | IP54 |
| Charging time | ca. 7-9 h | ca. 5-7 h |
| Approx. price | 919 € | 464 € |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
Choosing between these two is less about which is "better" in the abstract, and more about which compromises fit your daily ride and your wallet.
If your commuting reality includes battered roads, regular potholes, speed bumps disguised as art installations and the occasional longer outing, the Apollo Air 2022 makes a lot of sense. The front suspension and bigger battery genuinely improve your day-to-day experience. You arrive less shaken, with more range in hand, and with a scooter that feels composed even when you're riding at the brisk end of sensible. You just have to accept that you're paying a pretty premium for comfort and that carrying it up many stairs is a workout.
If, however, your routes are mostly decent tarmac and bike lanes, your distances are modest, and your budget has a hard ceiling, the NIU KQi2 Pro is the smarter choice. It delivers a sturdy, confidence-inspiring ride, strong lighting, modern connectivity and a sense of "this will just keep working" - all for a price that makes the Apollo look slightly indulgent. You give up suspension and some punch, but in daily commuting terms, you may not miss them half as much as your bank account would miss the extra money.
Personally, if I had to live with one of these as my only commuter in a typical European city and pay for it out of my own pocket, I'd lean toward the NIU. It's not exciting, but it's quietly competent and financially sensible. If, on the other hand, my city's road department thinks cobblestones are still a good idea in the twenty-first century and someone else was paying, I'd be quite happy gliding to work on the Apollo Air 2022.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | Apollo Air 2022 | NIU KQi2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ❌ 1,70 €/Wh | ✅ 1,27 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ❌ 26,26 €/km/h | ✅ 16,57 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ✅ 32,59 g/Wh | ❌ 51,23 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | ✅ 0,50 kg/km/h | ❌ 0,67 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ❌ 27,45 €/km | ✅ 16,87 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ✅ 0,53 kg/km | ❌ 0,68 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ❌ 16,12 Wh/km | ✅ 13,27 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ✅ 14,29 W/km/h | ❌ 10,71 W/km/h |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | ✅ 0,0352 kg/W | ❌ 0,0623 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ✅ 67,5 W | ❌ 60,83 W |
These metrics boil the scooters down to pure maths: how much you pay per unit of energy or speed, how heavy they are relative to battery and power, how efficient they are per kilometre, and how fast they refill. Lower is better for most cost and weight ratios; higher is better where you want more "oomph" per unit, like power-to-speed or charging speed. They don't capture comfort or fun, but they do show which scooter is more efficient or better "spec'd per euro" on paper.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | Apollo Air 2022 | NIU KQi2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ✅ Slightly lighter, still hefty | ❌ Heavier to haul around |
| Range | ✅ Noticeably more real range | ❌ Enough, but clearly shorter |
| Max Speed | ✅ Faster, better for flow | ❌ Slower, more limited |
| Power | ✅ Stronger motor, better pull | ❌ Modest, struggles on hills |
| Battery Size | ✅ Larger pack, more margin | ❌ Smaller pack, less buffer |
| Suspension | ✅ Real front suspension | ❌ None, tyres only |
| Design | ✅ Sleek, techy commuter look | ❌ Clean but more utilitarian |
| Safety | ❌ Weaker lighting stock | ✅ Better lights, stable feel |
| Practicality | ❌ Awkward latch, wide when folded | ✅ Easier fold, app lock |
| Comfort | ✅ Far plusher on bad roads | ❌ Harsher on rough surfaces |
| Features | ✅ App tuning, regen lever | ✅ App, lock, OTA updates |
| Serviceability | ❌ More brand-specific quirks | ✅ Wider dealer-style support |
| Customer Support | ✅ Decent, scooter-focused | ✅ Strong brand network |
| Fun Factor | ✅ Faster, more engaging | ❌ Sensible but a bit dull |
| Build Quality | ✅ Refined, low rattles | ✅ Very solid, "tank-like" |
| Component Quality | ✅ Good for the class | ✅ Similarly solid parts |
| Brand Name | ❌ Smaller, scooter niche | ✅ Bigger, moped heritage |
| Community | ✅ Active Apollo scooter crowd | ✅ Large NIU ecosystem |
| Lights (visibility) | ❌ Adequate but unimpressive | ✅ Standout halo headlight |
| Lights (illumination) | ❌ Needs extra light off-road | ✅ Usable even on dark paths |
| Acceleration | ✅ Stronger, livelier pull | ❌ Softer, with throttle lag |
| Arrive with smile factor | ✅ Plush, a bit more fun | ❌ Satisfying, but more sensible |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ✅ Suspension saves your joints | ❌ Fine on good roads only |
| Charging speed | ✅ Slightly quicker per Wh | ❌ Slower relative to capacity |
| Reliability | ✅ Good track record | ✅ Excellent for budget class |
| Folded practicality | ❌ Bulky, latch less friendly | ✅ Simpler, nicer to handle |
| Ease of transport | ❌ Weight plus awkward shape | ✅ Still heavy, but easier |
| Handling | ✅ Composed even when pushed | ❌ Good, but less capable |
| Braking performance | ✅ Stable under harder stops | ❌ Adequate, slightly less planted |
| Riding position | ✅ Comfortable, natural stance | ✅ Spacious deck, wide bars |
| Handlebar quality | ✅ Wide, confidence-inspiring | ✅ Very wide, very stable |
| Throttle response | ✅ Linear, predictable, direct | ❌ Delay and kick-start |
| Dashboard/Display | ✅ Nicely integrated, clear | ✅ Bright, easy to read |
| Security (locking) | ❌ App only, basic options | ✅ Built-in electronic lock |
| Weather protection | ✅ IP54, sealed drum, good | ✅ IP54, well protected |
| Resale value | ✅ Holds value reasonably well | ✅ Strong brand helps resale |
| Tuning potential | ✅ App tweaks, scooter scene | ❌ More locked-down ecosystem |
| Ease of maintenance | ❌ Tyre valves, brand-specific bits | ✅ Tubeless, dealer assistance |
| Value for Money | ❌ Comforty, but pricey | ✅ Excellent bang for buck |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the APOLLO Air 2022 scores 6 points against the NIU KQi2 Pro's 4. In the Author's Category Battle, the APOLLO Air 2022 gets 28 ✅ versus 22 ✅ for NIU KQi2 Pro (with a few ties sprinkled in).
Totals: APOLLO Air 2022 scores 34, NIU KQi2 Pro scores 26.
Based on the scoring, the APOLLO Air 2022 is our overall winner. Between these two, the NIU KQi2 Pro ends up feeling like the more rational choice: it delivers a solid, reassuring ride and grown-up build quality without punishing your bank balance, and it quietly gets the commuting job done. The Apollo Air 2022 rides nicer and feels more capable when the roads turn ugly, but its higher price makes it harder to justify unless you really value that extra comfort and range. If you want a scooter that simply works, asks for little and leaves more money for everything else in life, the NIU is the one that makes the most sense. If you're willing to pay to pamper your joints and give your rides a slightly more "premium" feel, the Apollo still has a certain understated charm - just know exactly what you're paying extra for.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.

