Apollo Air 2022 vs NIU KQi3 MAX - Which "Almost-Premium" Commuter Scooter Actually Delivers?

APOLLO Air 2022
APOLLO

Air 2022

919 € View full specs →
VS
NIU KQi3 MAX 🏆 Winner
NIU

KQi3 MAX

850 € View full specs →
Parameter APOLLO Air 2022 NIU KQi3 MAX
Price 919 € 850 €
🏎 Top Speed 35 km/h 38 km/h
🔋 Range 37 km 65 km
Weight 17.6 kg 21.0 kg
Power 1000 W 900 W
🔌 Voltage 36 V 48 V
🔋 Battery 540 Wh 608 Wh
Wheel Size 10 " 9.5 "
👤 Max Load 120 kg 120 kg
Speed Comparison

Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)

The NIU KQi3 MAX takes the overall win here: more punch, more real-world range, stronger brakes and better long-distance commuting chops, even if it rides a bit firm on rough streets. The Apollo Air 2022 fights back with a noticeably softer ride thanks to its front suspension and slightly lower weight, making it kinder to your joints on broken pavements and easier to lug for short distances.

Choose the NIU if your commute is longer, hillier, and you care most about power, range and tank-like solidity. Choose the Apollo if your roads are bad, your trips are shorter, and comfort matters more than outright muscle. Both have flaws, but each fits a clear rider profile-keep reading to see which one fits you rather than the marketing brochure.

If you can spare a few minutes, the full comparison below will save you from an expensive mismatch.

There's a point in any scooter enthusiast's life where the rental toys and bargain-basement clones stop cutting it. You start wanting something that feels like a real vehicle, not a folding shopping trolley with a motor. That's exactly where the Apollo Air 2022 and NIU KQi3 MAX step in: "premium-ish" commuters promising grown-up build, decent range, and just enough power to stay interesting.

I've racked up many kilometres on both, over bike lanes, dodgy pavements, surprise potholes, wet manholes, and the usual urban circus. On paper they're close cousins; in practice they take very different approaches. The Apollo Air is all about comfort and civility. The NIU is the heavier, more muscular cousin that doesn't mind being thrashed day in, day out.

If you're torn between "plush but modest" and "powerful but firm", this comparison will walk you through exactly what you gain and what you lose on each choice. Let's dig in.

Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?

APOLLO Air 2022NIU KQi3 MAX

Both the Apollo Air 2022 and NIU KQi3 MAX sit in that awkwardly crowded "better than entry-level, not quite hardcore" commuter class. Prices land in the mid-to-upper hundreds of euros, a serious investment but still far from the lunacy of dual-motor monsters.

They're for people who actually commute: riders doing several kilometres each way, maybe with a backpack, maybe in the rain, and who don't want to be constantly thinking "is this thing going to snap in half today?". You're probably not chasing top-speed records. You just want something quick enough to keep pace with urban traffic, with enough range that you don't arrive home in eco-crawl every evening.

They're natural competitors because they target the same buyer: someone who wants a "real" scooter but isn't ready for 30+ kg of aluminium and anxiety. Similar speeds, similar price bracket, app integration on both, both from brands with actual support channels. Yet their philosophies diverge: Apollo leans into comfort and feel, NIU leans into performance and robustness. That's where the choice gets interesting.

Design & Build Quality

Specs Comparison

In the flesh, both scooters look far more "vehicle" than "toy", but they do it in different dialects.

The Apollo Air 2022 has that clean, tech-minimalist vibe. Single-piece frame casting, hidden cables, subtle graphite colour. It feels tidy and almost understated, the sort of scooter you can park in an office lobby without security giving it the side-eye. The wide bars feel solid in your hands, and the deck's rubber surface is practical more than flashy: easy to wipe, grippy when wet, no shredded grip-tape drama after a rainy month.

The NIU KQi3 MAX, by contrast, looks like someone shrank a NIU moped. The "Space Grey" chassis with red accents and proper-looking calipers has a more automotive feel. The stem is thick and confidence-inspiring, the deck has that distinctive U-shaped profile and beefy rubber grip, and the overall impression is "built to take abuse". Where the Apollo whispers "refined commuter", the NIU quietly mutters "I'll survive your city better than you will".

Panel gaps, welds and finish are good on both, but the NIU edges ahead in sheer solidity. When you grab the stem and rock it, it barely budges. The Apollo's single-piece frame is very good by commuter standards, but side by side the NIU feels like the denser, more overbuilt object. The price for that solidity, of course, comes later when you have to pick it up.

Ride Comfort & Handling

This is where the Apollo Air really puts its hand up. The front dual-fork suspension combined with big pneumatic tyres makes a noticeable difference the moment you roll over your first cracked pavement slab. On bumpy city paths, the Apollo takes the edge off nicely. After 5 km of broken sidewalks and patchy asphalt, my knees and wrists are still on speaking terms. It's not magic-carpet stuff, but in this class it's one of the more forgiving rides.

Handling-wise, the wide bars and stable geometry make the Air easy to place in a lane and confidence-inspiring in curves. It's not twitchy; it feels like it wants to go straight and calm, which is exactly what you want at commuter speeds. Fast slaloms between bollards feel controlled rather than nervy.

The NIU KQi3 MAX does things differently. No suspension at all, just large, chunky tubeless tyres doing "passive suspension" duty. On decent asphalt the ride is impressively smooth and planted, to the point where you forget there's no fork or rear shock doing any work. But hit rough tarmac or repeated potholes and you're quickly reminded that you are, indeed, the suspension. On cobbles and bad patchwork, you'll be bending your knees and working for your comfort more than on the Apollo.

On the flip side, that rigid chassis makes the NIU feel very precise at speed. The wide deck and bars give you a wonderfully stable stance, and once you're cruising, it feels like it wants to sit there all day. Leaning into sweeping bends, the rear-motor push and stiff frame combine into a reassuring, slightly sporty feel. If your roads are mostly good, the NIU's "connected to the surface" sensation is almost fun. If they're bad, it's just tiring.

Comfort verdict: if your daily route includes broken pavement, expansion joints and mystery patches of DIY road repair, the Apollo is kinder. If your city has mostly decent tarmac, the NIU feels wonderfully stable, but it definitely demands more from your joints.

Performance

Both scooters land in that sweet spot where you can keep up with urban bike-lane flow and often outpace it, but they approach power differently.

The Apollo Air 2022's motor delivers what I'd call "sensible briskness". It gets you up to its cruising speed quickly enough to feel zippy, but never aggressive. Throttle response is linear, so creeping around pedestrians or threading through tight gaps feels predictable. You won't win any drag races against tuned Dualtrons, but you'll leave most rental scooters and cheaper commuters behind at the lights, which is what matters for safety and sanity.

Hill performance is decent: city hills are handled without melodrama, but on steeper slopes you'll feel it settling into a steady plod rather than a confident charge. Light and medium-weight riders will be fine. Heavier riders or very hilly routes will expose the limits; it doesn't die, but it stops pretending to be sporty.

The NIU KQi3 MAX is noticeably more muscular. The higher-voltage system and strong peak output give it a punchier shove off the line. In its sportiest mode, it accelerates with a satisfying, smooth urgency - not yank-your-arms-off, but enough that you feel you're on the "serious" end of single-motor commuters. It also holds its pace better as you approach its top-end, where the Apollo starts to feel like it's working hard.

On hills, the NIU simply outclasses the Apollo. Short, steep ramps that make the Air breathe heavily are taken in stride on the KQi3 MAX, even with a heavier rider. It's the difference between "okay, we'll get there" and "yep, no problem". For riders over the hundred-kilo mark or cities with proper inclines, that difference is very real.

Braking is another area where NIU flexes. Dual mechanical discs plus adjustable regen give you sharp, confident stopping with good modulation. Emergency stops feel short and drama-free. The Apollo's combo of a front drum and smooth regen at the rear is actually quite good and very low maintenance, but it doesn't bite as hard or as quickly as the NIU system. It's more "progressive and calm" than "wow, that stopped fast".

So in terms of performance feel: Apollo = calm, adequate, controlled. NIU = more eager, more capable on hills, more stopping power. Neither is a rocket, but one clearly tries a bit harder.

Battery & Range

Neither scooter is pretending to be a cross-country machine, but both aim to comfortably cover a typical urban week's worth of commuting with some playtime sprinkled in.

The Apollo Air 2022 packs a battery big enough for what I'd call "serious but not heroic" daily use. Ride it like most people do - mixed modes, frequent full-throttle bursts, stop-and-go traffic - and you can comfortably cover a typical workday return trip and some errands. Stretching to a very long round trip in sport mode will have you watching the gauge more closely, and you'll feel that familiar softening of acceleration as you get down into the last third of the battery. Not tragic, but noticeable.

The NIU KQi3 MAX simply goes further. In real use, it tends to deliver a very solid range even when ridden briskly, and crucially it holds its power better as the battery drains. You don't get that "oh, we're in limp-home mode now" feeling as early. For long commutes or riders who can't be bothered to charge every single day, this matters a lot. You can skip a day of charging without planning a rescue mission.

Charging times are roughly in the same "overnight or at-the-office" ballpark. Neither is going to wow you with fast-charging wizardry. Both are: plug it in when you get home, unplug in the morning, forget about it. The NIU's slightly larger pack unsurprisingly takes a tad longer to charge in full; in practice, you're rarely charging from absolutely empty anyway.

Range anxiety perspective: with the Apollo, you'll plan a bit if your round trip starts creeping towards the top of its comfortable real-world capability. With the NIU, you have a more relaxed margin for detours, headwinds, and "I'll just pop across town as well while I'm out".

Portability & Practicality

Here, both scooters remind you they are not toys, but one is significantly more forgiving.

The Apollo Air 2022's weight is on the chunky side for something called "Air", but still just about manageable. Carrying it up a short flight of stairs or into a car boot is doable without cursing your life choices, especially if you're reasonably fit. You'll notice it, but it doesn't feel like weight training. The non-folding handlebars make the folded package a bit wide, which is annoying in tight hallways and on packed trains, but it will fit under most desks with a little Tetris.

The folding mechanism is sturdy and confidence-inspiring when locked, but it does require you to bend down and wrestle with a low-mounted latch. It's secure, yes, but not the most ergonomic setup if you're folding and unfolding multiple times a day. Think "good for two cycles a day", not "I'll fold this at every café stop".

The NIU KQi3 MAX, meanwhile, is simply heavy. The extra few kilos over the Apollo are very noticeable in the real world. Lifting it into a car or up a staircase moves into "this is exercise" territory. The thick stem isn't the friendliest thing to grip if you have smaller hands either. Multi-modal commuters juggling trains, stairs, and tight buses will quickly start resenting those kilos.

On the plus side, NIU's folding design is quick and slick. The latch feels overbuilt in a good way, and once you get used to the motion, folding and unfolding is fast and satisfying. Folded dimensions are reasonable, but again the wide bars mean it occupies more lateral space than more minimalist commuters. Under a desk or in a hallway corner it's fine; in rush-hour metro chaos, it's... optimistic.

Practical takeaway: neither is a featherweight; the Apollo is the more realistic choice if you need to carry it regularly. If your scooter mostly rolls and only occasionally gets lifted, the NIU's extra mass is tolerable and buys you that rock-solid feel on the road.

Safety

Both scooters take safety more seriously than the typical budget fare, but they prioritise different things.

On the Apollo Air 2022, the star of the safety show is stability and predictable behaviour. The wide bars, big tyres and front suspension give you excellent control in less-than-ideal conditions. That matters when you hit a wet manhole cover at an angle or need to brake on gravel. The dual braking setup (front drum plus smooth regen at the rear) is reliable, easy to modulate, and unaffected by rain. Stopping distances are respectable, and, more importantly, the scooter stays composed under hard braking.

The lighting on the Apollo is adequate for being seen, but less convincing for seeing. The high-mounted headlight is fine on lit streets; on dark paths, you'll quickly wish for an extra handlebar or helmet light. The rear brake light does its job, but it's not a light show. You're covered, but you're not exactly a beacon.

The NIU KQi3 MAX, by comparison, is more aggressive in its safety hardware. That Halo headlight really is as good as people say: bright, wide, with a proper beam pattern that lets you actually see where you're going without blinding everyone else. In winter dusk or on dim cycle paths it's a big comfort upgrade over the Apollo.

Brakes are a clear NIU win: dual mechanical discs plus regen give strong, repeatable stops with loads of feedback at the levers. You feel you can really lean on them if a car does something stupid. Combined with the wide tyres and planted chassis, emergency braking feels almost boringly controlled-and boring is exactly what you want in a panic stop.

Add in those self-healing tyres and you reduce the risk of sudden flats, which is a safety feature as much as a convenience one. A mid-corner blowout on a tubed tyre is nobody's idea of fun; the NIU's gel-filled tubeless setup gives some peace of mind there.

Overall: Apollo focuses on composure and comfort; NIU brings brighter lights, stronger brakes, and puncture resilience. If night riding and busy traffic are your daily reality, the NIU is the more reassuring package.

Community Feedback

Apollo Air 2022 NIU KQi3 MAX
What riders love
  • Very smooth, comfortable ride for the class
  • Stable handling and wide handlebars
  • Solid, rattle-free chassis feel
  • App tuning for acceleration and regen
  • Low-maintenance drum brake
  • Good water resistance for daily use
What riders love
  • Strong torque and hill-climbing
  • Excellent dual-disc + regen braking
  • Halo headlight and visibility
  • Long, realistic range
  • Self-healing tubeless tyres
  • Tank-like build and stability
What riders complain about
  • Heavier than the name suggests
  • Awkward, stiff low-mounted folding latch
  • Stock headlight too weak for dark paths
  • Wide bars awkward in tight spaces
  • Tyre valve access is fiddly
  • Noticeable drop in punch at low battery
What riders complain about
  • No suspension - harsh on bad roads
  • Very heavy to carry upstairs
  • Pronounced kick-to-start delay
  • App dependence for setup and tweaks
  • Low ground clearance scraping on tall bumps
  • Valve access also awkward at the rear

Price & Value

Both scooters sit in that "I'm serious about this" price tier. You're paying enough that you expect more than just okay specs and a prayer for support if something breaks.

The Apollo Air 2022 positions itself as a premium-feeling commuter with an emphasis on comfort and finish. For what you pay, you get a genuinely nice ride, strong build quality, and a decent brand infrastructure behind it. However, if you look purely at raw numbers-battery size, power, range-the value proposition starts to look a bit softer compared to some competitors, including the NIU. You're paying for refinement more than headline figures.

The NIU KQi3 MAX, meanwhile, tends to undercut the Apollo slightly while offering more battery, more grunt, and stronger braking. From a cold, spreadsheet perspective, it simply gives you more scooter per euro: better hill performance, longer range, better lighting, more serious stopping hardware. It's not absurdly cheap, but in this segment it's one of the stronger "bang for buck" options if you want a robust, do-it-all commuter and don't mind the weight or firm ride.

Value-wise, then: Apollo makes sense if comfort and brand feel are your priorities and you're not chasing maximum stats. NIU feels like the more aggressive offer if you want distance and muscle for the money.

Service & Parts Availability

Apollo, being a Canadian brand with growing European distribution, has put real effort into support and parts. You're not dealing with a random marketplace seller. There are dedicated channels, documentation, and a reasonably active community willing to help. That said, depending on your country, you may find fewer official service partners than with bigger mass-market names. Parts can be obtained, but might take a bit of patience if you're outside major hubs.

NIU comes from the opposite direction: a large global EV manufacturer that has built out networks for its electric mopeds and then slotted scooters into that ecosystem. In many European cities you'll find NIU-branded shops or authorised partners, and spares are generally easier to track down. Firmware updates, diagnostics and warranty handling tend to feel a bit more "corporate" and structured.

On DIY repair friendliness, Apollo's simpler suspension and drum-regenerative brake combo means fewer bits to tweak, but there's also less standard bicycle-style hardware. NIU's dual disc setup is very recognisable bike tech, but the heavier frame and integrated design can make some things more awkward to wrangle at home.

Overall, NIU has the edge in sheer network and parts presence in Europe; Apollo counters with a more enthusiast-driven community vibe.

Pros & Cons Summary

Apollo Air 2022 NIU KQi3 MAX
Pros
  • Very comfortable ride for its class
  • Front suspension plus big tyres
  • Stable, confidence-inspiring handling
  • Neat, minimalist design and clean cabling
  • Low-maintenance drum + regen braking
  • App customisation for ride feel
  • Lighter than the NIU
Pros
  • Strong power and hill performance
  • Excellent dual-disc + regen brakes
  • Long real-world range
  • Superb Halo headlight and visibility
  • Self-healing tubeless tyres
  • Very solid, "tank-like" build
  • Strong value for power and range
Cons
  • Hefty for something called "Air"
  • Folding latch stiff and low-mounted
  • Headlight weak for unlit routes
  • Wide bars compromise folded practicality
  • Performance tails off noticeably at low battery
  • Spec sheet looks modest versus price
Cons
  • No suspension - harsh on rough roads
  • Very heavy to carry frequently
  • Kick-to-start delay annoys some
  • App dependence for unlock and settings
  • Low ground clearance on big bumps
  • Can feel overkill for very short, smooth commutes

Parameters Comparison

Parameter Apollo Air 2022 NIU KQi3 MAX
Motor power (rated) 500 W front hub 450 W rear hub (900 W peak)
Top speed ca. 32-35 km/h ca. 32-38 km/h
Advertised range 50 km 65 km
Realistic range (mixed riding) 30-37 km ca. 45 km
Battery 36 V 15 Ah (540 Wh) 48 V (608,4 Wh)
Weight 17,6 kg 21 kg
Brakes Front drum + rear regen Dual mechanical discs + rear regen
Suspension Front dual fork None (pneumatic tyres only)
Tyres 10" pneumatic, tubed 9,5" tubeless pneumatic, self-healing
Max load 100-120 kg 120 kg
IP rating IP54 IP54
Charging time 7-9 h ca. 8 h
Approx. price 919 € 850 €

Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?

Both the Apollo Air 2022 and NIU KQi3 MAX are decent attempts at the "serious commuter without going full lunatic" brief, but they land in slightly different camps.

If your city's infrastructure is rough, with cracked pavements, uneven tarmac and the occasional cobblestone stretch, the Apollo Air 2022 makes the daily grind more tolerable. Its front suspension and relaxed handling take the sting out of bad surfaces. For moderate distances and mainly urban cruising, it feels pleasant, civilised, and easy to live with-as long as you're not expecting monster performance for the price or planning to carry it up three floors every day.

The NIU KQi3 MAX, however, is the more complete commuter tool for most riders. It goes further on a charge, climbs hills with less drama, stops harder, and lights up the road like a proper vehicle. It feels sturdier, more purposeful, and more reassuring at higher speeds, even if it gives nothing away in comfort on bad roads. If your commute is longer, hillier, or you're a heavier rider, it simply makes more sense, provided you can live with the extra weight and the lack of suspension.

In the end, I'd sum it up like this: choose the Apollo Air if your top priority is a softer, friendlier ride on questionable surfaces and your trips are reasonably short. Choose the NIU KQi3 MAX if you want a tougher, longer-legged machine that feels closer to a mini-vehicle than a gadget. For most commuters, the NIU edges it as the more capable everyday partner, but the Apollo still has a clear niche for comfort-focused city riders.

Numbers Freaks Corner

Metric Apollo Air 2022 NIU KQi3 MAX
Price per Wh (€/Wh) ❌ 1,70 €/Wh ✅ 1,40 €/Wh
Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) ❌ 26,26 €/km/h ✅ 22,37 €/km/h
Weight per Wh (g/Wh) ✅ 32,59 g/Wh ❌ 34,52 g/Wh
Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) ✅ 0,50 kg/km/h ❌ 0,55 kg/km/h
Price per km of real-world range (€/km) ❌ 30,63 €/km ✅ 18,89 €/km
Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) ❌ 0,59 kg/km ✅ 0,47 kg/km
Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) ❌ 18,00 Wh/km ✅ 13,52 Wh/km
Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) ✅ 14,29 W/km/h ❌ 11,84 W/km/h
Weight to power ratio (kg/W) ✅ 0,0352 kg/W ❌ 0,0467 kg/W
Average charging speed (W) ❌ 67,50 W ✅ 76,05 W

These metrics strip away emotion and just compare how efficiently each scooter turns euros, kilograms and watt-hours into speed, distance and power. Lower "price per Wh" and "price per km" figures mean you're getting more battery and usable range for your money. Lower weight-related ratios indicate a lighter machine relative to its energy or performance. Efficiency in Wh/km shows how far each scooter goes on a given amount of energy, while the power-to-speed and weight-to-power ratios hint at how "stressed" the motor is and how much mass it has to haul per watt. Average charging speed simply shows how quickly each charger refills the battery in energy terms.

Author's Category Battle

Category Apollo Air 2022 NIU KQi3 MAX
Weight ✅ Noticeably lighter to carry ❌ Heavy for daily lifting
Range ❌ Fine but modest ✅ Comfortably longer daily range
Max Speed ❌ Adequate, nothing extra ✅ Slightly stronger top-end
Power ❌ Zippy but limited ✅ Punchier, better on hills
Battery Size ❌ Respectable but smaller ✅ Larger, more usable capacity
Suspension ✅ Front fork really helps ❌ None, tyres only
Design ✅ Clean, minimalist urban look ❌ Chunkier, more utilitarian
Safety ❌ Good but unremarkable ✅ Strong brakes, great lights
Practicality ✅ Easier to lug, still solid ❌ Heavy, bulky for stairs
Comfort ✅ Softer, friendlier on bumps ❌ Firm, depends on road
Features ❌ Pretty basic overall ✅ Halo light, self-heal tyres
Serviceability ❌ Fewer standard bike parts ✅ Familiar brakes, wide network
Customer Support ✅ Enthusiast-focused, responsive ✅ Big-brand network presence
Fun Factor ❌ Calm, a bit restrained ✅ More shove, more grin
Build Quality ✅ Solid, refined for class ✅ Extremely robust, tank-like
Component Quality ❌ Decent but not standout ✅ Strong brakes, tyres, details
Brand Name ❌ Smaller, enthusiast niche ✅ Big global EV brand
Community ✅ Active enthusiast presence ✅ Large mixed-vehicle base
Lights (visibility) ❌ Okay but unspectacular ✅ Halo DRL really stands out
Lights (illumination) ❌ Insufficient for dark paths ✅ Proper usable beam
Acceleration ❌ Gentle, commuter-focused ✅ Stronger, livelier pull
Arrive with smile factor ❌ Pleasant, not exciting ✅ More grin per kilometre
Arrive relaxed factor ✅ Soft ride, low fatigue ❌ Harsher on rough streets
Charging speed ❌ Slower in practice ✅ Slightly quicker per Wh
Reliability ✅ Simple, proven commuter ✅ Overbuilt, long-term reports
Folded practicality ❌ Wide bars, awkward latch ✅ Fast, neat folding clip
Ease of transport ✅ Manageable weight short hops ❌ Brutal on stairs
Handling ✅ Stable, comfy, forgiving ✅ Precise, planted at speed
Braking performance ❌ Good but softer ✅ Strong dual discs + regen
Riding position ✅ Comfortable, natural stance ✅ Wide, roomy deck stance
Handlebar quality ✅ Wide, confidence-inspiring ✅ Wide, solid, ergonomic
Throttle response ✅ Smooth, linear control ❌ Kick-start delay irritates
Dashboard/Display ✅ Clean, integrated, legible ❌ Can be dim in sun
Security (locking) ❌ Basic, app less central ✅ App lock, alarm support
Weather protection ✅ IP54, decent fenders ✅ IP54, better coverage
Resale value ✅ Holds okay in niche ✅ Stronger big-brand appeal
Tuning potential ❌ More locked-in ecosystem ❌ Also fairly closed system
Ease of maintenance ✅ Less to adjust, simple ❌ Heavier, more brake upkeep
Value for Money ❌ Comfort over raw numbers ✅ Strong spec for price

Overall Winner Declaration

Winner

In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the APOLLO Air 2022 scores 4 points against the NIU KQi3 MAX's 6. In the Author's Category Battle, the APOLLO Air 2022 gets 19 ✅ versus 28 ✅ for NIU KQi3 MAX (with a few ties sprinkled in).

Totals: APOLLO Air 2022 scores 23, NIU KQi3 MAX scores 34.

Based on the scoring, the NIU KQi3 MAX is our overall winner. Between these two, the NIU KQi3 MAX simply feels like the more sorted everyday machine: it pulls harder, goes further, stops better and gives that reassuring sense of a proper vehicle under your feet. The Apollo Air 2022 counters with a softer, easier-going ride that treats your body more kindly on ugly streets, but can't quite match the NIU's all-round capability for serious commuting. If I had to live with one as my main urban workhorse, it would be the NIU - it may be heavier and less forgiving on cobbles, but it feels like the scooter that will shrug off years of real-world use while still putting a smile on your face when you twist the throttle.

That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.