Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
The NIU KQi3 Pro edges out the Apollo Air 2022 as the better all-round commuter: it feels more substantial, stops harder, offers similar real-world range for less money, and comes with a more mature ecosystem behind it. If you want a scooter that just quietly gets the job done every day with strong brakes and a planted feel, NIU is the safer long-term bet.
The Apollo Air 2022 still makes sense if comfort is your obsession and you ride on rougher city surfaces - its front suspension does take the sting out of potholes better than the NIU's fat-tyres-only approach. It's also a bit lighter and a touch more refined in vibration damping, if you can live with the price premium.
If your priority is value, braking confidence and "serious vehicle" feel, start with the NIU. If you want a softer ride and don't mind paying more for it, look at the Apollo. Now let's dig into the details that actually matter once you leave the spec sheet behind.
Electric scooters in this price band all promise the same thing: "premium commuter" comfort without "hyper-scooter" drama. The Apollo Air 2022 and NIU KQi3 Pro both claim exactly that, and on paper they're shockingly close - similar speeds, similar ranges, similar weights, both from brands that like to talk about quality.
But once you've ridden both for a few hundred kilometres, the personalities diverge. The Apollo Air goes all-in on suspension comfort and a sleek, almost minimalist aesthetic. The NIU KQi3 Pro counters with tank-like solidity, brutal stopping power, and a more grown-up, moped-inspired vibe.
If you're trying to choose your daily workhorse - the scooter you'll actually rely on in rain, traffic and bad moods - the differences matter more than the brochure. Let's break down where each one shines, where they stumble, and which one deserves space in your hallway.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
Both scooters sit in the "serious commuter, not a toy" category. They're a step above rental-style kicks and supermarket specials, but not so fast or heavy that you need motorcycle gear and a gym membership to live with them.
The Apollo Air 2022 targets riders who want comfort first: daily commutes over patchy city asphalt, maybe some rougher bike paths, and a strong preference for a smooth, quiet ride over headline-grabbing power. It's the "I want my knees to survive another year" option.
The NIU KQi3 Pro is aimed at the practical urbanite who just wants a reliable, sturdy vehicle with good brakes, decent range and minimal drama. Think of it as the sensible city car of scooters: not exciting, but you trust it to start every morning and behave predictably.
They're competitors because they sit in a similar performance band - mid-thirties km/h tops, roughly the same realistic range, similar max loads - but with different philosophies: Apollo chases comfort and a slightly more premium feel, NIU chases solidity and value.
Design & Build Quality
In the flesh, the Apollo Air 2022 looks like something a design agency had a proper go at. The frame is a single, clean casting, cabling disappears inside the bodywork, and the integrated display keeps the cockpit tidy. It has that "modern gadget" vibe - tasteful graphite tones, wide bars, and a rubber deck that feels more like a product than a DIY kit.
The NIU KQi3 Pro feels less like a gadget and more like a small vehicle. The welds are chunky, the tubing looks overbuilt in a reassuring way, and the signature halo headlight at the front gives it a bit of moped style. Colour accents and a broad, sculpted deck make it look more expensive than it is. You get that "this thing will outlast my enthusiasm" impression when you pick it up.
In the hand, the Apollo feels lighter and more svelte. The stem casting is elegant, the controls are nicely spaced, and the finish is generally tidy. But some elements still feel "commuter scooter" rather than "mini-vehicle": the low-mounted folding latch is functional more than delightful, and there are places where the design is clever, rather than robust.
The NIU, by contrast, errs on the side of overkill. The deck is thicker, the stem feels like it was designed for a heavier machine, and the hinges and latches snap shut with an industrial clunk. It's not subtle, but it is confidence-inspiring. You do pay for that in weight and slightly bulkier dimensions, though.
On pure "object lust", the Apollo may edge ahead for some, especially if you like sleek minimalism. On "this will still feel tight after two winters and a few careless drops", the NIU has the upper hand.
Ride Comfort & Handling
This is where the philosophical divide appears immediately. The Apollo Air 2022 comes with a proper front fork, combined with chunky air-filled tyres. The result is a front end that actually moves over bumps rather than punching them straight into your wrists. On broken cycle lanes and patched asphalt, the Apollo is definitely the softer ride. Five kilometres of rubbish city pavements feels annoying, not punishing.
The KQi3 Pro has no mechanical suspension at all. Instead, it relies on wide, high-volume tubeless tyres to soak up chatter. On reasonably smooth tarmac, this works surprisingly well: you get a firm, planted feel with enough air volume to blunt the buzz. But hit repetitive sharp edges - rough cobbles, expansion joints, neglected bike paths - and you start feeling more of it through your knees and lower back than on the Apollo.
Handling-wise, both are stable; neither feels twitchy or toy-like. The Apollo's wide bars and decent stem height give good leverage and encourage a strong, athletic stance. It tracks nicely through bends and feels composed at its top speed, although the front suspension can introduce a little dive under hard braking or heavy bumps, which you notice when you really push it.
The NIU is the definition of "planted". The long, wide deck lets you adopt a natural stance, the steering geometry is calm, and the fat tyres give a satisfying gyroscopic steadiness. There's less vertical movement from the chassis, so it feels more "one piece" over undulations. On smooth bike lanes, it really does feel like an SUV: not cushy like an air-sprung limo, but solid and predictable.
If your city is mostly decent tarmac with occasional rough patches, the NIU's firmness is fine and the stability feels great. If you regularly roll over cracked pavements, speed bumps and pothole festivals, the Apollo's suspension is kinder on your joints, even if the rest of the scooter doesn't feel quite as bombproof.
Performance
The Apollo Air 2022 uses a front hub motor with enough grunt to pull away from cyclists and sit happily at the higher end of legal-ish city speeds. It accelerates with a smooth, linear surge rather than a hit, and it never really intimidates. You twist your thumb, it glides faster, and that's pretty much the story. On hills, it does... OK. Standard city inclines are handled without drama, but steeper ramps will knock the speed down and remind you this isn't a powerhouse.
The NIU KQi3 Pro runs a rear motor on a higher-voltage system. On the road, that translates into a slightly more assertive step-off and better traction when you're climbing hills or starting on dubious surfaces. It's still not a torque monster, but it feels less strained when you point it uphill, especially with a heavier rider on board. Top speed is in the same general ballpark as the Apollo - brisk for a commuter, not "call my lawyer" fast.
In city traffic, both keep up perfectly well with bike-lane flow. The Apollo's throttle mapping is particularly nice for new riders: forgiving, predictable, almost impossible to panic-whack yourself into trouble. The NIU feels a bit more eager, with that rear-motor push that makes it slightly more fun out of corners and more confident on slick patches.
Braking is where the gap opens. The Apollo combines a front drum with regenerative braking at the rear. The regen lever is actually pleasant to use, and for gentle city riding you can often slow down almost entirely on motor braking, saving the drum for emergencies. But when you really need to stop in a hurry, you notice that it's still a single mechanical brake doing the hard work.
The NIU answers with discs at both ends plus regen. Grab a handful of levers and the Pro digs its tyres into the tarmac with much more authority. You feel the rear motor helping, the discs biting, and the chassis staying composed. It's the kind of braking package that makes you a bit lazier about planning every stop, because you trust it to bail you out of the occasional poor decision.
In short: the Apollo is quick enough and very civilised; the NIU feels a bit more muscular on hills and a lot more serious when you need to shed speed quickly.
Battery & Range
On paper, the Apollo carries a slightly larger battery than the NIU. In practice, their real-world ranges overlap heavily. Ridden like most people actually ride - a healthy dose of top-speed cruising, some hills, maybe a backpack and a few stoplights - both deliver commutes in the low to mid-thirties of kilometres without drama, assuming average rider weight.
The Apollo's lower-voltage system tends to feel a bit more sensitive as the battery drops. Above roughly a third charge, it holds its pace decently; below that, you can feel the zip softening and the scooter becoming more conservative. Perfectly normal behaviour, but you're definitely reminded to head home.
The NIU's higher voltage helps it maintain its composure deeper into the pack. It doesn't suddenly become a rocket at low charge, but the drop-off in performance feels less dramatic until you're close to empty. If you're the kind of rider who routinely stretches your range to "I probably should have left earlier", this is reassuring.
Charging-wise, the NIU is a bit quicker from flat to full. Both are overnight chargers in realistic daily use: plug them in after work, they're ready by morning. Neither is going to compete with a petrol station stop, so you plan around daily top-ups, not opportunistic ten-minute boosts.
Range anxiety? On either scooter, a typical in-city rider doing a two-way commute plus some detours will rarely wake up at night worrying about it - as long as they remember the plug exists.
Portability & Practicality
Despite the Apollo's airy name, it's not a featherweight. You can carry it up a flight or two of stairs without hating life, but regular fourth-floor slogs will become a fitness regimen you didn't sign up for. The folding mechanism is sturdy but a bit faffy: the latch is low, requires a proper bend-down, and doesn't feel particularly friendly when you're rushing for a train.
Once folded, the Apollo forms a fairly compact length, but the bars don't fold in, so it's still a wide package. Under a large desk, in a car boot, or in a hallway, it's fine. On a packed metro where you're already apologising to strangers with your backpack, it's... negotiable.
The NIU KQi3 Pro is heavier again and you feel every extra kilo when you pick it up. Carrying it up multiple floors is a chore - doable, but you'll invent new swear words. The folding motion itself is easier: flip the collar, pull the lever, drop the stem into the rear catch. It feels intuitive and locks solidly every time.
Folded, the NIU is also long and wide - again, non-folding bars - so you're not saving much footprint over the Apollo. But the way it locks together makes it slightly easier to carry by the stem without the whole thing twisting in your hands.
For pure portability, the Apollo's lower weight gives it a marginal edge. For "pick up occasionally, mostly roll it everywhere", the NIU's more robust folding feel is slightly nicer. Neither is what I'd call a truly multimodal scooter for people who live on stairs and public transport; they're both happiest rolling, not being lugged.
Safety
Both scooters take safety more seriously than the average budget stick-on-wheels, but they do it in different ways.
The Apollo relies on its big tyres, front suspension and geometry to keep you upright, plus that dual braking approach (drum + regen) for redundancy. At city speeds, grip from the air-filled tyres is good, and the wide bars let you correct small slips before they become incidents. The headlight is high-mounted and fine for being seen, but on unlit paths you'll want an extra light unless you enjoy guessing where the potholes are.
The NIU comes out swinging with a much stronger lighting package. The halo headlight is bright, distinctive, and hard to ignore for oncoming traffic. The giant always-on ring also makes you more visible sideways at junctions. Add in decent rear lighting and reflectors and you feel properly "road present" even in grim weather.
Then you get to braking: Apollo's system is perfectly adequate if you use it sensibly and keep your tyres in good shape. The NIU's dual discs plus regen are a tier above in outright stopping confidence. In sudden car-door moments or pedestrian-late-realisation scenarios, the NIU simply gives you more margin.
Stability at speed? The Apollo is calm; the NIU is calmer. That longer, wider stance and fat rubber keep the Pro tracking straight even when the surface isn't perfect. On wet or dusty corners, both reward smooth inputs, but the NIU's rear drive and tyres feel slightly more predictable when grip starts to go.
Overall, both are much safer propositions than the usual cheap clones. But if you're buying with "what happens when someone does something stupid in front of me?" foremost in your mind, the NIU has the more reassuring toolkit.
Community Feedback
| Apollo Air 2022 | NIU KQi3 Pro |
|---|---|
| What riders love | What riders love |
|
|
| What riders complain about | What riders complain about |
|
|
Price & Value
The Apollo Air 2022 plants itself near the top of the "entry-premium" price range. You're paying not just for a motor and a battery, but for a decent fork, a clean frame design, and a brand that at least talks the talk on support and app integration. The ride quality is good enough that many owners feel the price is just about justified - especially if their local roads resemble a physics experiment in pothole formation.
The NIU KQi3 Pro undercuts it significantly while still offering a robust frame, a globally recognised brand, and very strong component choices where it matters: brakes, tyres, electronics. For a lot of people, this is where the equation tilts: a scooter that feels this solid and this grown-up, at a noticeably lower price, is hard to argue with.
On pure "what do I get per euro?", the NIU is the better deal. The Apollo has its strengths, but you're paying a clear premium for that suspension and design polish - without getting meaningfully more performance or range in the real world. If money is tight and you're being honest with yourself about needs versus wants, the NIU makes the more logical financial sense.
Service & Parts Availability
Apollo, being North America-based with European partners, has improved a lot in terms of after-sales, but in Europe you're still somewhat at the mercy of resellers and shipping times for certain parts. They do stock spares and the community is active and helpful, but it's not yet a walk-into-any-random-shop ecosystem.
NIU, coming from the electric moped world, has a broader footprint. In many European cities you can find NIU dealers who already service their seated scooters, which means trained techs, easier access to official parts, and less worry about the brand disappearing overnight. The app and firmware ecosystem also feel more mature - less beta-testy, more "we've done this on bigger vehicles before".
If being able to get a brake lever or a controller swapped without spending evenings on forums is important, NIU has the edge. Apollo isn't bad, but NIU is a step closer to mainstream vehicle support.
Pros & Cons Summary
| Apollo Air 2022 | NIU KQi3 Pro |
|---|---|
Pros
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
Cons
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | Apollo Air 2022 | NIU KQi3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Motor power (rated) | 500 W front hub | 350 W rear hub (700 W peak) |
| Top speed | ca. 32-35 km/h | ca. 32 km/h (region-dependent limit) |
| Advertised range | 50 km | 50 km |
| Realistic range (mixed riding) | ca. 30-37 km | ca. 30-40 km |
| Battery | 36 V 15 Ah (540 Wh) | 48 V (486 Wh) |
| Weight | 17,6 kg | 20 kg |
| Brakes | Front drum + rear regen | Front & rear disc + regen |
| Suspension | Front dual fork | None |
| Tyres | 10" pneumatic (tubed) | 9,5" tubeless pneumatic, extra wide |
| Max load | 100-120 kg | 120 kg |
| IP rating | IP54 | IP54 |
| Charging time | 7-9 h | ca. 6 h |
| Typical street price | 919 € | 662 € |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
Both the Apollo Air 2022 and NIU KQi3 Pro are competent commuters that sit a notch above the usual rental clones. Neither is a miracle machine, but both are good enough that your daily ride will depend more on your city and your habits than the headline specs.
If your roads are rough, your wrists are sensitive, and you care more about comfort than raw value, the Apollo Air 2022 still has a place. That front suspension does what it says on the tin: it takes the edge off bad surfaces in a way the NIU simply cannot. If your commute is a greatest hits compilation of potholes, patched tarmac and sunken manhole covers, you'll appreciate the Apollo every single morning.
For most riders, though, the NIU KQi3 Pro is the more sensible choice. It stops harder, feels more planted, offers similar or better real-world range for noticeably less money, and comes from a brand with a broader service footprint. It's not glamorous or thrilling, but it gives you that reassuring "this will just work" feeling every time you unfold it.
If I had to live with one as my main city vehicle, I'd pick the NIU. The Apollo Air 2022 is pleasant, especially on bad surfaces, but the NIU KQi3 Pro feels more like a mature transport tool than a fancy commuter gadget - and in the long run, that's what tends to matter when the novelty wears off.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | Apollo Air 2022 | NIU KQi3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ❌ 1,70 €/Wh | ✅ 1,36 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ❌ 26,26 €/km/h | ✅ 20,69 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ✅ 32,59 g/Wh | ❌ 41,15 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | ✅ 0,50 kg/km/h | ❌ 0,63 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ❌ 27,45 €/km | ✅ 18,91 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ✅ 0,53 kg/km | ❌ 0,57 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ❌ 16,12 Wh/km | ✅ 13,89 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ✅ 14,29 W/km/h | ❌ 10,94 W/km/h |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | ✅ 0,0352 kg/W | ❌ 0,0571 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ❌ 67,5 W | ✅ 81 W |
These metrics are just different ways of slicing the numbers: cost efficiency (price per Wh, per km/h, per km), weight efficiency (how much mass you carry per performance or range), energy efficiency (Wh per km), and charging convenience. They don't tell you how the scooters feel, but they do highlight where each one is objectively more or less efficient on paper: Apollo wins on power-to-weight and weight-related ratios, NIU wins on cost-per-everything and electrical efficiency.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | Apollo Air 2022 | NIU KQi3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ✅ Noticeably lighter to haul | ❌ Heavier, tougher on stairs |
| Range | ❌ Slightly less usable range | ✅ Goes a bit further |
| Max Speed | ✅ Tiny edge on top end | ❌ Slightly slower on paper |
| Power | ✅ Stronger nominal motor | ❌ Lower rated wattage |
| Battery Size | ✅ Larger capacity pack | ❌ Smaller capacity pack |
| Suspension | ✅ Real front suspension | ❌ Tyres only, no shocks |
| Design | ✅ Sleek, minimalist aesthetic | ❌ More utilitarian visual vibe |
| Safety | ❌ Decent but weaker braking | ✅ Stronger brakes, better lights |
| Practicality | ❌ Less value, awkward latch | ✅ Better value, easier living |
| Comfort | ✅ Softer over rough surfaces | ❌ Firmer, no suspension |
| Features | ✅ Suspension, app, regen lever | ❌ Fewer comfort features |
| Serviceability | ❌ More brand-dependent support | ✅ Wider dealer-style network |
| Customer Support | ❌ Improving but less widespread | ✅ Stronger global presence |
| Fun Factor | ✅ Softer, playful urban glide | ❌ More serious, less playful |
| Build Quality | ❌ Good, but not tank-like | ✅ Feels sturdier, more robust |
| Component Quality | ❌ Decent, a bit mixed | ✅ Strong brakes, solid bits |
| Brand Name | ❌ Smaller, niche scooter brand | ✅ Large, established mobility brand |
| Community | ✅ Active enthusiast user base | ✅ Big mixed moped/scooter crowd |
| Lights (visibility) | ❌ Adequate but forgettable | ✅ Halo headlight stands out |
| Lights (illumination) | ❌ Weak on dark paths | ✅ Brighter, more useful beam |
| Acceleration | ✅ Slightly livelier initial shove | ❌ Softer but adequate pull |
| Arrive with smile factor | ✅ Plush ride, feels nice | ❌ Competent but less charming |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ✅ Suspension eases body fatigue | ❌ Firm ride on rougher roads |
| Charging speed | ❌ Slower average charging | ✅ Quicker top-up turnaround |
| Reliability | ❌ Good, but younger platform | ✅ Proven, "reliability king" rep |
| Folded practicality | ❌ Awkward latch, still wide | ✅ Easier fold, solid latch |
| Ease of transport | ✅ Lighter, slightly easier carry | ❌ Heavier, more awkward |
| Handling | ✅ Agile, comfy front end | ✅ Very stable, planted feel |
| Braking performance | ❌ Adequate but modest | ✅ Strong dual discs + regen |
| Riding position | ✅ Comfortable, natural stance | ✅ Wide, relaxed, very stable |
| Handlebar quality | ✅ Wide and confidence-inspiring | ✅ Wide, ergonomic, well-angled |
| Throttle response | ✅ Smooth, intuitive mapping | ❌ Slight safety-tuned lag |
| Dashboard/Display | ✅ Clean, nicely integrated | ❌ Functional but less elegant |
| Security (locking) | ❌ Basic, app less central | ✅ Solid app lock integration |
| Weather protection | ✅ IP54, decent for showers | ✅ IP54, equally capable |
| Resale value | ❌ Niche, smaller used audience | ✅ Stronger mainstream recognition |
| Tuning potential | ✅ App tuning, community tweaks | ❌ More locked-down ecosystem |
| Ease of maintenance | ❌ Suspension adds complexity | ✅ Simpler, more standard parts |
| Value for Money | ❌ Pricey for what you get | ✅ Strong performance per euro |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the APOLLO Air 2022 scores 5 points against the NIU KQi3 Pro's 5. In the Author's Category Battle, the APOLLO Air 2022 gets 21 ✅ versus 23 ✅ for NIU KQi3 Pro (with a few ties sprinkled in).
Totals: APOLLO Air 2022 scores 26, NIU KQi3 Pro scores 28.
Based on the scoring, the NIU KQi3 Pro is our overall winner. Between these two, the NIU KQi3 Pro simply feels like the more complete real-world partner: it's calmer under pressure, easier to trust when traffic does something stupid, and kinder to your wallet without feeling cheap. The Apollo Air 2022 has its charms - that softer, more cosseting ride is genuinely pleasant - but it never quite escapes the sense that you're paying a premium for comfort while giving up some of the seriousness and solidity the NIU brings. If your heart leans towards cushy suspension and minimalist looks, the Apollo will keep you content. But if your gut says "I just want something that feels like a small, trustworthy vehicle", the NIU is the one that will quietly win you over ride after ride.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.

