Fast Answer for Busy Riders β‘ (TL;DR)
If you want the more rounded, modern, and confidence-inspiring commuter, the Apollo Air 2022 is the overall winner here - it rides smoother, feels more refined, and is simply easier to live with day in, day out. The ZERO 8 hits harder in raw punch and top speed for less money, but it shows its age in safety, refinement, and wet-weather composure. Choose the Apollo if you care about comfort, build polish and support; pick the ZERO 8 if you're chasing maximum shove per euro and don't mind compromises in tyres, braking and weather protection. Both will get you to work; only one really feels like it was designed for today's commuters rather than yesterday's spec sheets.
Stick around for the full breakdown - the devil, as always, is in the details (and in the potholes).
You could look at the Apollo Air 2022 and the ZERO 8 as two very different answers to the same question: "How do I make my commute suck less?" One comes from a modern, app-happy, design-led Canadian brand keen on comfort and polish. The other is a slightly rougher, older-school powerhouse that's built its reputation on torque, suspension and value.
I've put plenty of kilometres on both: city bike lanes, broken pavements, wet manhole covers, hurried evening dashes when you're late and the battery isn't full. The Apollo Air 2022 feels like a contemporary premium commuter that's been sensibly reined in; the ZERO 8 feels like someone bolted a strong motor into a compact chassis and then negotiated the rest of the scooter around that decision.
If you're wondering which one deserves your money - and, more importantly, which one deserves to be trusted with your daily grind - let's dig in.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
Both scooters live in that "serious commuter, but not a monster" segment. They're far beyond rental toys, yet still light enough that you can, with a straight face, call them portable. They sit around the same weight, similar real-world range, and both claim to be capable hill-climbers with proper suspension.
The Apollo Air 2022 aims at riders who want comfort, a clean design, and the feeling that the scooter was engineered as a single product rather than assembled from a parts catalogue. It's for people who'll happily give up a little punch and headline speed in exchange for a calmer, more planted ride and better brand support.
The ZERO 8 is more of a "bang-for-buck warrior": higher voltage system, punchier acceleration, proper dual suspension, and a lower price tag. It's for riders who started on something cheap and underpowered, got frustrated on hills, and now want their next scooter to actually move - but still fold up and fit under a desk.
So why compare them? Because a lot of real-world buyers are stuck exactly between these two mindsets: comfort and modernity versus performance and price. And both scooters, on paper, seem to tick those boxes. The road, of course, tells a more nuanced story.
Design & Build Quality
Pick up the Apollo Air 2022 and the first impression is "grown-up object". The one-piece frame casting feels tight and cohesive, the cables are nicely tucked away, and the graphite finish looks like it belongs in an office lobby, not a shed. The integrated display and the rubberised deck give it that "finished product" vibe - nothing screams parts-bin special.
The ZERO 8, on the other hand, wears its mechanics on its sleeve. You see springs, bolts, and brackets. It looks more like a compact tool than a piece of urban tech. That's not automatically bad - if you like the industrial look, it has a certain charm - but side by side, the Apollo simply feels more modern and more carefully put together.
In the hands, the Apollo's stem is chunky and reassuringly solid, with practically no play when locked. The redesigned latch is on the stiff side but rewards you with a wobble-free front end. The ZERO 8's folding system is robust but can develop a bit of stem play over time if you don't stay on top of adjustments - nothing catastrophic, but it adds to the slightly "DIY" character it has out of the box.
Hardware quality follows the same theme. The Apollo's rubber deck, decent plastics and tight tolerances feel more premium. The ZERO 8 feels tougher than it looks in pictures, but the finish is more utilitarian. It's the difference between something you're happy to park inside reception versus something that feels more at home chained to a bike rack.
Ride Comfort & Handling
On broken city surfaces, the Apollo Air 2022 earns its keep. The combination of front fork suspension and large pneumatic tyres gives it a surprisingly plush, controlled feel. Ride it over aged asphalt and patchy tarmac and you get more of a rounded "thud" than a sharp crack. After a longer commute your knees and wrists thank you for choosing this rather than a stiff rental.
The ZERO 8 goes a different route: true dual suspension, with a front spring and a twin hydraulic setup at the rear. On smooth-to-moderate surfaces, it's excellent - genuinely impressive for a scooter of its size. However, the smaller wheels and that solid rear tyre mean sharp edges still make themselves known, and the rear doesn't quite have the same "floating" quality as a good air-tyre setup. It's comfortable, but there's a firmer, slightly busier feel at the tail.
In corners, the Apollo's wider handlebars and longer wheelbase feel more planted and less twitchy. You can carve gentle arcs at commuter speeds with one hand hovering over the brake and not feel nervous. The ZERO 8, with its smaller wheels and narrower stance, is nimble and fun, but it asks for a bit more concentration, especially on uneven corners. Hit a mid-corner pothole and the Apollo shrugs it off more calmly; the ZERO 8 reminds you you're on 8-inch wheels.
Over a series of bumpy sidewalks and dubious cobbles, the Apollo is the scoot I'd choose if I needed to arrive feeling vaguely fresh. The ZERO 8 is acceptable for that duty, but you feel more of the road - particularly out back - and over distance that adds up.
Performance
This is where the ZERO 8 tries to take the gloves off. That rear motor, fed by a higher-voltage system, comes alive when you pull the trigger. Off the line, it has that satisfying shove that makes rental scooters feel like they're powered by angry hamsters. In its sportiest mode, it sprints to its cruising pace fast enough to put a grin on your face and, occasionally, a raised eyebrow on nearby cyclists.
The Apollo Air 2022 is zippy, but more composed. Its motor is tuned for smooth, linear delivery rather than theatrics. You pull away from lights decisively, keep up with city flow in most scenarios, and its throttle mapping makes low-speed work through pedestrians or narrow cycle paths easy. It's very rarely "exciting", but it is confidence-inspiring - which for a commuter is arguably more important.
Top-speed feel is another story. On the ZERO 8, once you creep up towards its upper end, things start feeling properly quick. The smaller wheels amplify the sensation - fun when the tarmac is clean and dry, slightly less fun when the surface is patchy. The Apollo's top end is more sensible; you still move faster than most bike-lane traffic, but it doesn't chase that last chunk of speed in the same way.
On hills, the ZERO 8 has the upper hand. Steeper urban inclines that make lesser scooters wheeze are taken with more authority. The Apollo will handle typical city grades without drama, but push into longer, steeper territory and it starts to feel more like "adequate" than "eager". If you live in a very hilly city and care mainly about climbing performance for the least money, the ZERO 8 makes a strong case - albeit with trade-offs elsewhere.
Battery & Range
In real-world riding - mixed speeds, some hills, some stop-start - both scooters land in a similar "comfortable commuter" range. You're looking at daily return trips of medium length without sweating it, provided you're not spending the entire time at full throttle.
The Apollo Air 2022 carries a reasonably chunky battery for a single-motor commuter. Ridden briskly, you're looking at enough range for most urban users to do a there-and-back plus a detour, without living on the last bar. Ride more gently and it stretches nicely. As the battery drains, you notice the usual softening of acceleration and a slight drop in top speed towards the lower charge levels, but it's gradual rather than dramatic.
The ZERO 8, in its larger-battery configuration, roughly matches that day-to-day usability, though if you fully exploit the extra speed and punch, you do pay for it in reduced distance. Treat it like a mini hot-rod and you'll be hunting for a plug sooner than you hoped; treat it like a commuter and it'll do your regular routes just fine. The smaller-battery variant is noticeably more limited - fine for shorter urban hops, more marginal for ambitious daily distances.
Charging behaviour aligns with their personalities. The Apollo leans into the "plug it in overnight or at the office" routine. The ZERO 8 charges somewhat quicker from empty if you have the larger battery, which helps if you're trying to do multiple legs in one day and can give it a solid lunchtime top-up.
Portability & Practicality
Neither of these scooters is a featherweight. If you were hoping to casually swing one over your shoulder while sipping a latte, reality is going to resent you. We're firmly in "can carry it, won't love doing it repeatedly up multiple flights of stairs" territory.
The Apollo Air 2022 feels dense but manageable. The non-folding handlebars make it slightly awkward in cramped lifts or narrow train doors, and the weight means you'll think twice before committing to a long stair-carry. Around a station, into a boot, or up one short flight? Fine. Repeated fourth-floor hauls? That gets old quickly.
The ZERO 8 responds by folding smaller and neater. The telescoping stem and folding bars make a big difference: once collapsed, it becomes a tidy, almost rectangular package that slides under desks and into car boots with less drama. The integrated rear grab handle also makes it easier to muscle around. The flip side is that the compact footprint doesn't magically make it feel lighter - your back still knows you're carrying a fairly hefty scooter.
In day-to-day practical use, the Apollo fights back with its better water resistance and more commuter-friendly geometry. It's the one I'd rather be on when the forecast lies and you get caught out in drizzle. The ZERO 8's more modest wet-weather design and smaller wheels mean you start watching puddles and painted lines with much more suspicion.
Safety
Braking is the first big fork in the road. The Apollo Air 2022 uses a hybrid setup: a low-maintenance front drum paired with properly tuned regenerative braking at the rear. The regen is smooth, progressive and genuinely useful - in many situations you barely touch the mechanical brake. Together, they give you stable, predictable stopping with less risk of locking the wheel unexpectedly.
The ZERO 8 relies on a single rear drum. It's reliable and low maintenance, and the feel is progressive enough for newer riders, but you can't escape physics: all the real stopping is being asked of the back wheel. Shift your weight correctly and it works; misjudge your weight transfer on a panic stop, and it doesn't feel quite as reassuring as a more balanced dual system. It's "good enough", but not a setup that inspires huge confidence at the upper end of its speed range.
Lighting is another contrast. The Apollo's higher-mounted headlight and clear brake light are oriented more towards genuine utility, even if serious night riders will still want extra illumination for dark country paths. The ZERO 8's deck-level triple LEDs and glamour lighting make you very visible to others, but don't project an especially long or high beam. You're more of a rolling light show than a precision pothole-spotter; again, a bar-mounted light is basically mandatory if you ride at night.
Tyre choice, grip and stability lean to the Apollo. Big pneumatic tyres front and rear, combined with that sturdy chassis, give you more forgiving behaviour in the wet and over rough surfaces. The ZERO 8's mixed combo - air up front, solid at the rear - is a maintenance win but clearly compromises wet grip at the back. On dry tarmac it's fine; on damp paint or metal covers, you learn quickly to be gentle and upright.
At commuter speeds, the Apollo simply feels calmer and more predictable. The ZERO 8 can certainly be ridden safely, but it demands more respect from the rider, particularly in less-than-ideal conditions.
Community Feedback
| Apollo Air 2022 | ZERO 8 |
|---|---|
| What riders love Smooth, "gliding" ride; premium-feeling chassis; stable wide bars; low-maintenance drum + regen braking; app customisation; clean design; decent water resistance; grown-up aesthetic. |
What riders love Strong acceleration and hill power; genuinely effective suspension for size; compact folding with collapsing bars; zero rear flats; adjustable handlebar height; solid, durable frame; very good value. |
| What riders complain about Heavier than the name suggests; stiff, low-mounted latch; headlight only "OK"; wide bars awkward indoors; fiddly valve access; noticeable performance drop at low battery; setup via app can confuse beginners. |
What riders complain about Rear solid tyre slippery in the wet; only one rear brake; occasional stem wobble if not maintained; modest water protection; 8-inch wheels vulnerable to bad potholes; some rattles developing over time; heavier than many expect for a "compact" scooter. |
Price & Value
On sticker price alone, the ZERO 8 looks like a slam-dunk: a considerably cheaper scooter offering more punch and similar real-world range. From a purely mathematical, euros-per-watt perspective, it's hard to argue. You get brisk acceleration, dual suspension, and a solid commuting platform for significantly less money.
The Apollo Air 2022 sits in a higher price bracket and doesn't try to win a drag race. Where it does try to win is in refinement, comfort, support infrastructure and long-term daily usability. You're essentially paying a premium for better engineering, better finishing, better safety hardware and a more sorted commuting experience. For someone who genuinely uses a scooter as primary transport, that premium can make sense; for someone chasing maximum spec per euro, it will look less appealing.
Longer-term value tilts towards the Apollo if you care about reliability, brand support, and resale. The ZERO 8 gives you fantastic value up front, but some of its compromises - rear traction, single brake, smaller wheels - feel like corners cut that you end up managing yourself as a rider.
Service & Parts Availability
Apollo has built a noticeable ecosystem around its products. You get structured customer support, documentation, app integration, and a decent parts pipeline through its own channels and partners. In Europe, you're not left pleading with an anonymous seller if you need a latch or controller; there's an actual brand standing behind it.
ZERO, to its credit, also has a fairly wide parts footprint thanks to being distributed under various banners worldwide. Controllers, tyres, suspension parts and the usual wear items are not hard to track down, and there's a big DIY crowd who treat the ZERO line as Lego for grown-ups. That said, availability and quality of service can vary more depending on which reseller you bought from - you're more at the mercy of the retailer than of a tightly run central brand experience.
In both cases you can maintain and repair the scooter without dark magic; the Apollo just feels one step more "officially" supported, while the ZERO 8 leans a bit more on community and reseller networks.
Pros & Cons Summary
| Apollo Air 2022 | ZERO 8 |
|---|---|
Pros
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
Cons
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | Apollo Air 2022 | ZERO 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Motor power (nominal) | 500 W front hub | 500 W rear hub |
| Top speed (unlocked) | ca. 32-35 km/h | ca. 40 km/h |
| Advertised range | 50 km | bis 45 km (grΓΆΓere Batterie) |
| Realistic range (tested/claimed) | ca. 30-37 km | ca. 30-35 km (13 Ah) |
| Battery capacity | 540 Wh (36 V 15 Ah) | ca. 624 Wh (48 V 13 Ah) |
| Weight | 17,6 kg | 18 kg |
| Brakes | Front drum, rear regenerative | Rear drum |
| Suspension | Front dual fork | Front spring, rear dual hydraulic |
| Tyres | 10" pneumatic, front & rear | Front 8,5" pneumatic, rear 8" solid |
| Max load | bis ca. 100-120 kg | 100 kg |
| IP rating | IP54 | Keine offizielle hohe IP-Angabe |
| Charging time | ca. 7-9 h | ca. 5-7 h |
| Approx. price | 919 β¬ | 535 β¬ |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
On balance, the Apollo Air 2022 is the more complete scooter for modern commuting. It doesn't try to impress you with wild specs; it wins slowly, through comfort, composure, and the sense that someone actually thought about how you'd use it at eight in the morning on a wet Tuesday. Its braking, tyres, and water resistance are simply better suited to everyday city chaos, even if the performance feels more sensible than thrilling.
The ZERO 8 answers a different brief. If your priority list reads "power, suspension, folding size, and price" - in roughly that order - it offers a lot of scooter for the money. It goes faster, hits harder off the line, and folds into a small footprint that makes mixed train-scooter commuting easier. But you pay for that in older design thinking: single brake, mixed tyres with compromised wet grip, and less polish in both feel and finish.
If you see your scooter as a daily vehicle and want to maximise safety, comfort, and brand support - and you're willing to pay for it - the Apollo Air 2022 should be your pick. If budget is tight, you're technically inclined, ride mostly in the dry, and crave extra kick more than extra refinement, the ZERO 8 can still be a fun, capable workhorse. Just go in with eyes open about where it's cutting corners.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | Apollo Air 2022 | ZERO 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (β¬/Wh) | β 1,70 β¬/Wh | β 0,86 β¬/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (β¬/km/h) | β 26,26 β¬/km/h | β 13,38 β¬/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | β 32,59 g/Wh | β 28,85 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | β 0,50 kg/km/h | β 0,45 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real range (β¬/km) | β 26,26 β¬/km | β 16,46 β¬/km |
| Weight per km of real range (kg/km) | β 0,50 kg/km | β 0,55 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | β 15,43 Wh/km | β 19,20 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | β 14,29 W/km/h | β 12,50 W/km/h |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | β 0,0352 kg/W | β 0,0360 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | β 67,5 W | β 104,0 W |
These metrics strip the scooters down to pure maths: how much you pay and carry for each unit of battery, speed, and range, how efficiently they turn energy into distance, and how quickly they recharge. Lower "per something" numbers mean a more efficient or cheaper package; higher power-per-speed and higher average charging watts show where the scooter is more aggressively tuned or faster to refill.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | Apollo Air 2022 | ZERO 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | β Slightly lighter overall | β A bit heavier |
| Range | β More efficient real range | β Needs bigger battery |
| Max Speed | β Sensible but modest | β Noticeably faster top end |
| Power | β Calm, adequate shove | β Punchier, more eager |
| Battery Size | β Smaller total capacity | β Bigger pack available |
| Suspension | β Only front sprung | β True dual suspension |
| Design | β Modern, integrated, clean | β Older, industrial look |
| Safety | β Better tyres, dual braking | β Single rear brake, solid tyre |
| Practicality | β Better in wet, daily | β Weather and grip compromises |
| Comfort | β Plush, stable, low fatigue | β Busier, harsher rear feel |
| Features | β App, regen throttle, IP | β Basic dashboard, fewer tricks |
| Serviceability | β Straightforward, supported parts | β Easy, common, DIY friendly |
| Customer Support | β Strong brand-backed support | β Heavily reseller dependent |
| Fun Factor | β Calm, mostly sensible | β Punchy, playful, lively |
| Build Quality | β Tighter, more refined | β Robust but less polished |
| Component Quality | β More premium touchpoints | β Functional, cost-conscious |
| Brand Name | β Modern, rider-centric image | β Established performance name |
| Community | β Active, brand-engaged riders | β Large, mod-happy base |
| Lights (visibility) | β Higher, clearer signalling | β Low deck lights mainly show |
| Lights (illumination) | β Better beam height | β Short, low throw |
| Acceleration | β Smooth but not fierce | β Noticeably stronger punch |
| Arrive with smile factor | β Relaxed, satisfying glide | β Grin from extra shove |
| Arrive relaxed factor | β Much less physical strain | β More tiring, more focus |
| Charging speed | β Slower to refill | β Quicker turnarounds |
| Reliability | β Conservative, low-stress tuning | β Proven workhorse platform |
| Folded practicality | β Wide, fixed handlebars | β Compact with folding bars |
| Ease of transport | β Awkward shape to carry | β Better handles, smaller |
| Handling | β Stable, confidence inspiring | β Nimble but more twitchy |
| Braking performance | β Dual system, more control | β Single rear, longer stops |
| Riding position | β Natural, adult commuter stance | β Adjustable bars fit many |
| Handlebar quality | β Wide, solid, ergonomic | β Narrower, more flex, older |
| Throttle response | β Smooth, controllable curve | β Cruder, more on/off feel |
| Dashboard/Display | β Integrated, clean, modern | β Generic QS-style module |
| Security (locking) | β Cleaner frame for locks | β Many anchor points available |
| Weather protection | β IP-rated, wet-commute friendly | β More vulnerable in rain |
| Resale value | β Holds value, strong demand | β Cheaper, more saturated |
| Tuning potential | β Less mod-focused platform | β Popular with modders |
| Ease of maintenance | β Drum + tubes, straightforward | β Solid rear, easy servicing |
| Value for Money | β Costly for its performance | β Strong performance per euro |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the APOLLO Air 2022 scores 4 points against the ZERO 8's 6. In the Author's Category Battle, the APOLLO Air 2022 gets 28 β versus 19 β for ZERO 8 (with a few ties sprinkled in).
Totals: APOLLO Air 2022 scores 32, ZERO 8 scores 25.
Based on the scoring, the APOLLO Air 2022 is our overall winner. Between these two, the Apollo Air 2022 feels like the scooter that actually understands what a daily commute looks like: mixed weather, rough tarmac, the odd emergency stop, and a rider who would rather arrive relaxed than wired. The ZERO 8 still has its charms - especially if you're on a tighter budget and enjoy that extra punch - but its compromises show more clearly once you've lived with both. In the real world, where comfort, confidence and consistency matter more than spec-sheet bravado, the Apollo simply feels like the more complete, better-resolved companion.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective β but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.

