Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
The GOTRAX GX2 comes out as the overall winner here: it simply gives you more punch, more battery and more grin-per-euro if you care about performance and range above all. It feels like a budget power scooter that accidentally grew up and became a serious vehicle.
The APOLLO City, on the other hand, is the better pick if you ride year-round in wet climates, value polish, water protection and clever safety features, and don't mind paying a bit more for less outright muscle. It's the scooter you buy when you want something that behaves like a "civilised commuter" rather than a hot rod.
If you're still undecided, keep reading - the details of comfort, safety, and day-to-day livability make this comparison much closer than the spec sheet suggests.
Electric scooters have finally crawled out of the toy aisle and into the "actually replace my car" category - and both the APOLLO City and GOTRAX GX2 are very much aiming for that sweet spot. Dual motors, serious ranges, proper suspension and price tags that make your old rental Xiaomi look like a Happy Meal toy.
I've put plenty of kilometres on both: city centre commutes, grim winter rain, leafy bike paths, and the occasional "this is probably a bad idea" top-speed blast. They're both pitched as mid-range, do-it-all commuters - but they go about the job with very different personalities.
Think of the APOLLO City as the well-dressed, app-enabled office commuter that's obsessed with staying dry and composed, and the GOTRAX GX2 as the louder, heavier cousin that shows up late but wheelspins out of every junction. The question is: which one fits your daily chaos better? Let's dig in.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
Both scooters live in that awkwardly expensive but not-quite-luxury bracket: more than you'd impulse-buy, less than you'd finance. They target riders who've already graduated from rental scooters and cheap singles, and now want something that can genuinely handle a real commute, proper hills and year-round use.
The APOLLO City is clearly tuned for the urban professional commuter: slick design, strong water protection, clever regen braking and a big focus on refinement. It's less about chest-thumping stats and more about "will this get me to work every day without drama?".
The GOTRAX GX2 is targeted squarely at the power-hungry value hunter: dual motors with serious torque, a big battery, chunky frame and suspension that's more "urban tank" than sleek gadget. It's what you buy when you're done pretending you don't care about acceleration... but you still care about your bank account.
Price, performance and intended use overlap heavily, which makes these two natural rivals - and also makes their compromises painfully obvious when you ride them back-to-back.
Design & Build Quality
Put them side by side and they almost look like they're from different planets.
The APOLLO City goes for a minimal, unified, almost smartphone-like aesthetic. Internal cable routing, smooth lines, tasteful grey with subtle accents - very "designed object", not "parts bin project". In your hands, it feels dense and well-finished, with almost no rattles. The folding joint, in particular, locks up impressively tight; stem play is practically non-existent, even after many weeks of abuse.
The GOTRAX GX2, meanwhile, is industrial, exposed and unapologetically chunky. You see the bolts, the suspension arms, the fat stem. It looks like something that fell off a small utility vehicle. Build feels solid - frame flex is minimal, and the scooter takes pothole hits without audible complaints - but the finish is more "workhorse" than "design award". It's the kind of scooter you'd happily chain to a metal rack without worrying about scuffs.
In the hand, the APOLLO wins on perceived quality and ergonomics: narrower stem, smoother edges, better integration. The GX2 wins on raw sturdiness, but its thick stem is a pain to grab when folded and it all feels a bit overbuilt for its price - in both the good and the awkward sense.
Ride Comfort & Handling
This is where your knees and spine start voting.
The APOLLO City's triple-spring setup (one front, two rear) is clearly tuned for real-world city riding: it takes the sting out of sharp hits - drain covers, expansion joints, smashed asphalt - with a dull "thunk" instead of a violent jolt. Combined with its tubeless tyres and relatively compact footprint, you get a ride that feels composed rather than floaty. In tight city corners, it's quite agile; flicking it through bends feels natural and predictable.
On the GX2, you get dual spring suspension front and rear paired with wide, fat pneumatic tyres. It's more of a soft-roader vibe: it happily steamrolls broken tarmac, cobbles and rough park paths. At higher speeds, that extra width and weight make it feel extremely planted, but you do lose a bit of nimbleness versus the APOLLO in very tight manoeuvres. Think "big touring bike" versus "city bicycle" in terms of feel.
After a long ride on mixed surfaces, the GX2 leaves your legs a touch fresher thanks to the extra tyre width and long-travel feel, especially if you weigh on the heavier side. The APOLLO counters with slightly sharper steering and a more "connected" front end. Neither is punishing - but if your city has more craters than roads, the GX2's sheer mass and rubber win the comfort war by a nose.
Performance
If you enjoy a good traffic-light drag race (purely for scientific testing, naturally), the character difference is obvious in the first ten metres.
The APOLLO City's dual motors deliver a smooth, linear shove. There's no violent step, just a strong, progressive push up to city speeds that makes you feel in control rather than hanging on for dear life. It's quick enough to embarrass rental scooters and keep you firmly at the front of the bicycle lane pack, but it never feels like it's trying to rip your arms off. Hill starts are handled confidently; you don't need to plan your ascent.
The GOTRAX GX2 is simply more brutal. Dual motors here feel noticeably stronger when you pin the throttle. The scooter lunges forward with the kind of enthusiasm that makes new riders double-check their stance. Keeping up with city traffic on fast sections isn't theoretical - you just do it. Hills that made the APOLLO work a bit are shrugged off with a "was that it?" attitude. If you're a heavier rider, the GX2's extra muscle is very noticeable: less drama, more speed retained on climbs.
Top-speed behaviour also differs. The APOLLO feels very planted up to its comfortable cruising band, but beyond that you're aware you're near the envelope; it still feels safe, but not exactly relaxed. The GX2, thanks to its heft and wider tyres, feels more settled at higher speeds. You still need to respect it - any scooter at that pace demands your attention - but it doesn't get nervous.
Braking is closer than you'd think but with a twist: the APOLLO's dedicated regen paddle means you mostly ride it like an EV, slowing with your left thumb and barely touching the drum levers. It's smooth, predictable and addictive, and it scrubs speed surprisingly hard. The GX2's discs plus motor brake are more traditional: stronger initial bite from the discs, with the motor helping to settle things. Panic stops feel a bit shorter and more "grabby" on the GX2; the APOLLO feels more refined and easier to modulate in daily use.
Battery & Range
On paper, both sound generous. On the street, they're sanity-checked by gravity and your right thumb.
The APOLLO City's battery options sit firmly in the mid-range commuter bracket. Ride it like a normal human - mixed modes, some hills, cruising a bit below its maximum - and you're realistically looking at a solid medium-distance daily radius. Enough for a typical there-and-back commute with errands on the way home, but you'll start glancing at the battery percentage if you add a spontaneous evening joyride.
The GX2, with its big pack, simply goes further on the same style of riding. Push it hard in the fastest mode and you're roughly in the same real-world window as a fast-ridden Apollo; ride sensibly in a milder mode and you stretch it clearly further. In practice, that means less range anxiety and more "I'll take the long way home" freedom. For anyone with a longer commute or a habit of detouring just because the bike path looks nice today, that extra buffer matters.
Charging is another difference you feel: the APOLLO can realistically be recharged during a standard workday with a quicker charger. The GX2's big pack paired with a more modest charger means you're very much on an overnight schedule. Forget to plug in and you're not topping it up over breakfast - you're taking the bus.
Portability & Practicality
Let's be blunt: neither of these is a featherweight. If you want something to carry up three flights every day, look elsewhere.
The APOLLO City is heavy, but just about on the edge of "manageable" for occasional lifting if you're reasonably fit. The fold is quick and nicely engineered, and the stem hooks into the deck securely enough that you can grab and go without fear of it unfolding in your face. The big downside is the fixed, wide bars - great for control, not so great for squeezing into tiny lifts or crowded trains.
The GX2 takes that and adds a gym membership. It's in the "are you sure about this?" weight class. You can lift it into a car boot or up a couple of steps, but you'll feel every kilogram. The thick stem makes it awkward to grab with smaller hands, and while the folding system is sturdy, the scooter never really becomes compact - it becomes a dense, rectangular object that you will curse if your hallway is narrow.
For pure practicality, the APOLLO edges ahead: easier to live with in a flat, simpler to fold and carry short distances, and slightly less of a burden to manoeuvre indoors. The GX2 is best treated like a small motorbike: roll it, don't lift it, and give it a dedicated parking spot.
Safety
Both brands clearly understood that "fast scooter" and "questionable brakes" is a bad combination.
The APOLLO City's regen paddle plus drums setup is honestly one of the nicest urban braking experiences out there. Most of your slowing is done electronically and very predictably, with the drums as a calm, consistent backup. Add in the high water-resistance rating and you get a scooter that keeps all its tricks in the rain. Wet commute? No problem: the brakes behave the same, and you're not wondering if your controller is about to get a bath.
Lighting and signalling are another Apollo strength: integrated indicators on bars and deck, rear light, and an overall lighting package that makes you visible, even if the built-in headlight isn't exactly a forest-trail floodlamp. In city traffic, being seen is half the safety battle, and the City does that well.
The GX2 counters with more traditional safety hardware: proper discs with motor braking, a bright headlight and a reactive tail light that flares when you brake. At speed, that combination of heavy frame, wide tyres and strong mechanical brakes inspires a lot of confidence. Where it falls behind is in wet-weather reassurance: the lower water-resistance rating means you don't want to test your luck in sustained downpours, and the lack of turn signals feels like a missed opportunity on a scooter this quick.
Overall, if your riding involves rain, winter slush or lots of night commuting, the APOLLO feels like the safer, more rounded package. If you mostly ride in dry conditions and value outright stopping power and stability at higher speed, the GX2 holds its own nicely.
Community Feedback
| APOLLO City | GOTRAX GX2 |
|---|---|
What riders love
|
What riders love
|
What riders complain about
|
What riders complain about
|
Price & Value
Neither of these scooters is cheap, but they play the value game differently.
The APOLLO City asks you to pay a premium for refinement: waterproofing, clever regen braking, thoughtful design, lower maintenance and a more polished user experience. When you're riding it every day, those things do add up. But in cold performance terms - speed, acceleration, battery size - you're not getting as much per euro as with the GX2. You're buying niceness, not numbers.
The GOTRAX GX2 is much more of a blunt instrument of value: massive power for the price, big battery, good suspension, proper brakes. You feel where they saved money - the app, the less elegant finishing, some design quirks - but if you measure "what happens when I press the throttle" against the price tag, it's hard to argue with.
Over the long term, Apollo will claw some of that back with lower routine maintenance - drums, self-healing tyres, better weather protection. The GX2 wins short-term on power per euro, the APOLLO nudges ahead on "ownership serenity" - assuming you actually care about that and not just giggling at torque.
Service & Parts Availability
Apollo has spent a lot of effort building a support ecosystem: documentation, self-help videos, and an increasingly structured service approach. They've had their share of complaints about response time, but at least you know you're dealing with a company that designed the scooter, not just slapped a sticker on an OEM frame. Parts for the City are reasonably accessible through official channels and resellers, especially in Europe and North America.
GOTRAX, as a volume brand, has decent parts availability but inconsistent support experiences. There are plenty of spares floating around, but owner reports on warranty interactions are mixed - some get fast resolutions, others feel like they're shouting into the void for weeks. The plus side is that the GX2 is fairly conventional inside: standard dual-motor layout, disc brakes, common-size tyres. Most generic scooter shops won't be baffled by it.
If you like to tinker or use independent repair shops, the GX2's conventional architecture is fine. If you want a more guided, brand-led support experience, Apollo has the edge, even if they're not perfect either.
Pros & Cons Summary
| APOLLO City | GOTRAX GX2 |
|---|---|
Pros
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
Cons
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | APOLLO City (dual-motor) | GOTRAX GX2 |
|---|---|---|
| Rated motor power | 2 x 500 W | 2 x 800 W |
| Top speed (claimed) | ≈ 51 km/h | ≈ 56,3 km/h |
| Realistic cruising band | ≈ 35-40 km/h | ≈ 40-50 km/h |
| Battery capacity | ≈ 960 Wh (top version) | 960 Wh |
| Real-world range (mixed riding) | ≈ 35-45 km | ≈ 35-50 km |
| Weight | ≈ 29,5 kg | ≈ 34,5 kg |
| Brakes | Dual drum + regen paddle | Front & rear disc + motor brake |
| Suspension | Front spring + dual rear spring | Dual spring (front & rear) |
| Tyres | 10" tubeless pneumatic, self-healing | 10" x 3" pneumatic |
| Max load | 120 kg | ≈ 136 kg |
| Water resistance | IP66 | IP54 |
| Approximate price | ≈ 1.208 € | ≈ 1.391 € |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
Both scooters sit in that "almost great" category: they get a lot right, but you're always aware of the compromises. The trick is picking the compromises that annoy you the least.
If your life involves rain, winter, and daily reliability anxiety, the APOLLO City is the more reassuring partner. It's calmer, neater, easier to live with indoors and clearly built with commuting realities in mind - regen paddle, IP66, low maintenance. It doesn't deliver spectacular performance for the asking price, but it does deliver a largely hassle-free ownership experience, which some riders will value more than an extra punch off the line.
If your life involves longer distances, big hills, and an itch for strong acceleration, the GOTRAX GX2 is simply more satisfying. It feels like you're getting a lot of scooter for the money: more grunt, more real-world range and better high-speed stability. You give up weather resilience, portability, and some polish, but in return you get a ride that feels closer to a small electric motorbike than a commuter toy.
Distilled to rider profiles: choose the APOLLO City if you want a civilised, weatherproof daily tool with thoughtful safety features and can live with modest value on the spec sheet. Choose the GOTRAX GX2 if you want a brutish, value-packed power commuter and you're willing to wrestle with its weight and quirks to enjoy those extra watts.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | APOLLO City | GOTRAX GX2 |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ✅ 1,26 €/Wh | ❌ 1,45 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ✅ 23,69 €/km/h | ❌ 24,69 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ✅ 30,73 g/Wh | ❌ 35,91 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | ✅ 0,58 kg/km/h | ❌ 0,61 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ✅ 30,20 €/km | ❌ 32,73 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ✅ 0,74 kg/km | ❌ 0,81 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ❌ 24,00 Wh/km | ✅ 22,59 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ❌ 19,61 W/km/h | ✅ 28,41 W/km/h |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | ❌ 0,0295 kg/W | ✅ 0,0215 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ✅ 213,33 W | ❌ 137,14 W |
These metrics look at raw efficiency and value: how much you pay per unit of battery or speed, how much weight you carry for that energy and performance, how far each Wh takes you, and how quickly you can refill the tank. The APOLLO City wins on cost efficiency relative to its battery, speed and weight, and it charges faster. The GX2 wins on energy use per kilometre, raw power density and how much scooter you get per watt of motor output.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | APOLLO City | GOTRAX GX2 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ✅ Lighter, less painful to lift | ❌ Noticeably heavier brute |
| Range | ❌ Solid but unremarkable reach | ✅ Slightly longer real range |
| Max Speed | ❌ Fast enough, but modest | ✅ Feels quicker, more headroom |
| Power | ❌ Adequate, not thrilling | ✅ Strong dual-motor punch |
| Battery Size | ✅ Same capacity, lower price | ❌ Same capacity, higher price |
| Suspension | ✅ Plush, well-tuned urban setup | ❌ Effective but less refined |
| Design | ✅ Sleek, integrated, cable-clean | ❌ Industrial, functional not pretty |
| Safety | ✅ Better rain, signals, regen | ❌ Lacks signals, weaker IP |
| Practicality | ✅ Easier indoors, more civilised | ❌ Heavy, bulky to live with |
| Comfort | ❌ Comfortable, but narrower tyres | ✅ Wide tyres, plush at speed |
| Features | ✅ App, regen paddle, signals | ❌ Basic electronics, no signals |
| Serviceability | ✅ Good guides, thoughtful design | ❌ Conventional but less supported |
| Customer Support | ✅ Improving, relatively responsive | ❌ Mixed reports, slower help |
| Fun Factor | ❌ Calm, sensible enjoyment | ✅ More grin when throttling |
| Build Quality | ✅ Tight, low rattle, cohesive | ❌ Solid but less polished |
| Component Quality | ✅ Drums, tyres, hardware solid | ❌ Functional, more budget feel |
| Brand Name | ✅ Strong enthusiast reputation | ❌ Mass-market, budget legacy |
| Community | ✅ Active, engaged Apollo owners | ❌ Broad but less "enthusiast" |
| Lights (visibility) | ✅ Signals, clear presence in traffic | ❌ No indicators, simpler setup |
| Lights (illumination) | ❌ Headlight weak for darkness | ✅ Stronger, better night path |
| Acceleration | ❌ Smooth, but not ferocious | ✅ Punchy, clearly quicker |
| Arrive with smile factor | ❌ Satisfying, slightly muted | ✅ More giggles per commute |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ✅ Calm, predictable, low drama | ❌ More intense, demands focus |
| Charging speed | ✅ Much quicker workday top-ups | ❌ Slow, very overnight-oriented |
| Reliability | ✅ Low-maintenance layout, IP66 | ❌ More exposed, heavier strain |
| Folded practicality | ✅ More manageable folded package | ❌ Bulky folded, stem awkward |
| Ease of transport | ✅ Just within carryable range | ❌ Real pain to move |
| Handling | ✅ Nimble, composed urban manners | ❌ Stable, but less agile |
| Braking performance | ✅ Great regen, consistent drums | ❌ Strong, but less nuanced |
| Riding position | ✅ Ergonomic for many sizes | ❌ Tall, reachy for some |
| Handlebar quality | ✅ Wide, comfy, well-finished | ❌ Functional, less refined feel |
| Throttle response | ✅ Tunable, smooth power curve | ❌ Strong, slightly more abrupt |
| Dashboard/Display | ❌ Stylish, but sun-wash issues | ✅ Bright, more legible overall |
| Security (locking) | ✅ App lock, integrated features | ❌ Mostly physical lock reliant |
| Weather protection | ✅ IP66, true rain commuter | ❌ IP54, light-rain only |
| Resale value | ✅ Stronger brand, easier resale | ❌ Budget image, more depreciation |
| Tuning potential | ❌ More locked-in ecosystem | ✅ Conventional, easier to tinker |
| Ease of maintenance | ✅ Drums, tubeless, app diagnostics | ❌ Discs, tubes, heavier wrenching |
| Value for Money | ❌ Pay more for polish | ✅ Strong performance per euro |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the APOLLO City scores 7 points against the GOTRAX GX2's 3. In the Author's Category Battle, the APOLLO City gets 28 ✅ versus 11 ✅ for GOTRAX GX2.
Totals: APOLLO City scores 35, GOTRAX GX2 scores 14.
Based on the scoring, the APOLLO City is our overall winner. Between these two, the GOTRAX GX2 ultimately feels like the more compelling package if you judge with your throttle hand: it pulls harder, runs further and turns every straight into a small event, all while staying relatively affordable in its class. It's rougher around the edges, but it rewards you every time you ask it to hustle. The APOLLO City, though, will appeal to riders who care more about living with the scooter than bragging about it. It's calmer, more weather-ready and easier to own day in, day out. If you want a thrilling tool, the GX2 edges ahead; if you want a composed companion, the City quietly makes more sense.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.

