Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
If you want a fast, powerful scooter that also feels like an actual finished product, the Apollo Phantom 20 Stellar is the overall winner - it rides more refined, inspires more confidence, and is far easier to live with long term. The LAOTIE Ti30-II Landbreaker gives you staggering paper specs and huge range for a much lower price, but asks you to accept rough edges, DIY fettling, and a more "hold on and hope" experience at speed.
Pick the LAOTIE if your budget is tight, you're mechanically handy, and you mainly care about maximum watts and battery for the least money. Choose the Apollo if you value stability, safety, polish, and support as much as raw performance - especially if you're riding daily, in traffic, or in bad weather.
If you can spare a few more minutes, let's unpack how these two heavyweights really compare when the road gets rough and the throttle is pinned.
There's a certain type of rider who looks at a 25 km/h shared scooter and thinks, "That's cute." This article is for the other type - the ones who see 60V on a spec sheet and start calculating which bits of their city suddenly become "local".
On one side we have the LAOTIE Ti30-II Landbreaker, the budget berserker of the e-scooter world: huge battery, huge motors, huge weight, and a price tag that makes premium brands shift uncomfortably in their office chairs. It's for riders who'd rather buy raw metal and electrons than pay for marketing and polish.
On the other, the Apollo Phantom 20 Stellar: same brutal voltage class, but wrapped in a much more mature chassis. It tries hard to be the hyper-scooter you can actually live with - app integration, clever controls, proper water resistance, and real-world ride tuning rather than just shouting big numbers.
Both claim serious speed, long range, and tank-like presence. One feels like a hot-rodded kit that escaped the workshop; the other like it was actually meant to share the road with cars. Let's see which one deserves your money - and which one mostly deserves your tool kit.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
These two sit in the same broad performance and weight class: big dual motors, big 60V batteries, roughly the heft of a small human, and top speeds that make bicycle lanes a distant memory. They're aimed at experienced riders who want something between "serious commuter vehicle" and "small dimension-tearing device".
The LAOTIE chases the rider who wants maximum power and range per euro and is happy to trade refinement, warranty comfort, and brand reputation to get it. Think: rural or suburban riders, heavier folks who've murdered a few 500 W scooters already, and DIY tinkerers who consider thread-lock a love language.
The Apollo chases a similar rider in theory - long-range, high-speed, heavier-weight capable - but with a more grown-up spin: better suspension, far better weather sealing, stronger brakes, smarter controls, and proper after-sales support. It's aimed at people who ride often, ride hard, and still want to arrive looking like they made a sensible life choice.
They compete because, on paper, both promise "hyper-scooter" performance. In reality, they take almost opposite approaches to how that performance is delivered.
Design & Build Quality
Put these two side by side and the design philosophies almost shout at you.
The LAOTIE Ti30-II looks exactly like what it is: a brutalist block of metal built primarily to keep big motors and a giant battery attached to something vaguely scooter-shaped. The frame is a mix of iron and aluminium, chunky and unapologetically industrial. Exposed bolts, visible cabling, and a deck that's more "armoured plate" than "styled surface". You don't really admire it; you just respect that it might survive the apocalypse - provided you've tightened everything yourself.
The Apollo Phantom Stellar, in contrast, feels like someone actually drew it before they built it. The aerospace-grade aluminium frame is cohesive, with clean cable routing and a stem that doesn't look like it was bolted on as an afterthought. The integrated DOT display sits neatly in the cockpit instead of wobbling on a plastic mount, and the whole scooter has that "single solid piece" impression when you lift or rock it - less creaks, less flex, fewer mystery rattles.
In the hand, you notice details the spec sheet never mentions. LAOTIE's levers, clamps and small hardware have that very typical budget-Chinese OEM feel: they work, but tolerances and finishing vary, and you get the sense the quality control person went home a bit early on Fridays. The Apollo's controls, on the other hand, feel more deliberate. Brake levers have a predictable bite point, the switches click with intention, and the folding mechanism feels more like a precision latch and less like the tailgate of an old van.
If you like scooters that look like they were built in a garage by a particularly enthusiastic engineer, the LAOTIE has its charm. If you want something that looks and feels like a finished product, the Apollo is clearly on another level.
Ride Comfort & Handling
Here's where the personalities separate very quickly.
The Landbreaker rides on big 11-inch tyres with fairly stiff suspension front and rear. At city speeds on moderately rough roads it's actually not bad: the big air-filled tyres soak up smaller hits, and the wide deck lets you move your stance to manage bumps. But once you start stringing together broken sidewalks, potholes and patches of cobbles, the limitations show. The suspension is tuned more for load and speed than finesse; light to medium riders will find it chattery, and the front end can feel busy over repeated bumps. Think "off-road quad energy", not "magic carpet".
The handling is similarly split. At moderate speeds, the long wheelbase and big tyres give a sense of stability. Push closer to its claimed top end and you start to understand why forums talk so much about steering dampers and headset checks. Without dialled-in tightening or an aftermarket damper, the front can get nervous when you hit imperfections at speed, and you have to stay very awake on the bars.
The Apollo Phantom Stellar feels almost like it was designed by someone who has crashed a scooter before. The DNM hydraulic suspension has actual damping rather than just bounce. It compresses and rebounds in a controlled way, so when you slam into a nasty expansion joint at speed, the chassis takes one hit and settles instead of pogoing twice and unsettling your feet. After 5 km of bad city asphalt, your knees still feel like they belong to you.
The integrated steering damper is the quiet hero. At high speed, the Apollo tracks straight, shrugging off small twitches that would have the LAOTIE's bars wriggling in your hands. Cornering feels more composed, too: the wider hybrid tyres and lower-feeling centre of gravity give you more confidence to lean without that "am I about to oversteer myself into the hedges?" sensation.
If your riding is mostly short blasts and straight lines, the LAOTIE can be lived with. If you do long rides or routinely see bad road surfaces, the Apollo is in another league for comfort and composure.
Performance
Both scooters are monsters. They just monster in different ways.
The Landbreaker does exactly what its name suggests: slam the dual motors and turbo mode, and it lunges forward with the kind of torque that makes you automatically bend your knees and lean over the bars. There's very little subtlety in how it delivers power - it's more "electrical explosion" than "carefully managed thrust". For straight-line acceleration, especially up hills, it is hilariously effective. You'll out-drag almost anything on two wheels through the first tens of metres if you're brave enough to keep the throttle open.
But that aggression comes with a catch. At low speeds, especially in tight spaces, the throttle can feel snappy and slightly unpredictable until you really get used to it. There's a learning curve to moving slowly without looking like you've never used your own legs before. Add in the occasional reports of inconsistent controller tuning between units, and it becomes a bit of a lottery as to exactly how wild your particular Landbreaker will feel out of the box.
The Apollo's dual motors and "Ludo" mode actually hit harder on peak figures, but you'd never guess from the way power comes in. The MACH 3 controller is the grown-up in the room. You can roll at walking pace with precise control, then smoothly ramp into full thrust without that "light switch" feeling. Once you open it up, the acceleration is savage - genuinely in the territory where your helmet visor becomes a very useful thing - but it stays predictable. That predictability is what makes repeated hard launches fun rather than exhausting.
Hill climbing? Honestly, both scoot up gradients that make normal commuter scooters whimper. The LAOTIE brute-forces inclines with sheer wattage and doesn't really slow much with a heavy rider. The Apollo does the same, but with the sense that it's still got headroom in reserve and the controller is managing current to keep everything behaving nicely.
Top speed on both is far past what most people will ever use regularly. The difference is how they feel getting there. On the LAOTIE, the faster you go, the more you're consciously managing wobbles, surface changes and braking distance. On the Apollo, you're mostly thinking about traffic and line choice; the chassis does its job quietly in the background.
If you're chasing pure spec-bragging rights per euro, the LAOTIE scratches that itch. If you like your speed with a side of control, the Apollo is clearly ahead.
Battery & Range
On paper, the Landbreaker absolutely dwarfs the Apollo in battery capacity. Its huge 60V pack with well over 2.000 Wh is the kind of thing you usually only see on scooters costing a lot more. That translates to genuinely long days in the saddle if you're disciplined with your right thumb. Ride calmly in lower modes on flatter ground and hitting extreme distances on a single charge is realistic. Ride it like it begs to be ridden - hard, fast, lots of hills - and you still get very solid real-world distances that many riders will only need to top up once or twice a week.
The downside of that giant pack is charge time. Even using two chargers, you're still looking at a proper "overnight from low" schedule. The included chargers also don't inspire much confidence; they do the job, but they feel as budget as the price suggests, and they get worryingly warm if you leave them going for hours in a closed space. You'll want to treat charging as a bit of a ritual rather than an afterthought.
The Apollo Phantom Stellar comes with a smaller 60V pack in terms of total Wh, but it uses high-quality Samsung 21700 cells. In the saddle, this shows more in consistency than in raw hours: the power delivery sags less as the battery drains, and the usable portion of the charge feels more linear. Ride aggressively and you're realistically looking at somewhere in the middle of the manufacturer's claims; ride in Eco or mid modes and you can genuinely stretch it for long commutes.
Where Apollo claws some efficiency back is regenerative braking. That left-thumb regen lever is addictive; use it properly in stop-start city traffic and you noticeably squeeze more distance out of a charge while also saving your brake pads. Charging time is still long with the stock brick, but the ecosystem for faster, higher-quality chargers is much more solid, and you're not left wondering whether the wall-wart or the scooter will give up first.
In brute range terms, the LAOTIE has an edge. In how predictable, safe and fuss-free that range feels over the life of the scooter, the Apollo makes the better case.
Portability & Practicality
Let's be blunt: both of these are absurd as "portable" devices. We're talking around 50 kg each. That's gym equipment, not last-mile mobility.
The LAOTIE's folding system is heavy-duty but fairly crude. You wrestle with a chunky latch, wrangle the stem down, and you're left with something that technically fits in a car boot - assuming you're comfortable deadlifting it in. Carrying it up stairs is the sort of thing you attempt once, then immediately start researching ground-floor storage. Manoeuvring it in tight hallways or lifts feels like steering a loaded wheelbarrow in a phone box.
The Apollo doesn't magically defy physics - it's still seriously heavy - but the experience is less punishing. The stem latch has a triple safety design that's much easier to operate with confidence. When folded, the stem hooks to the deck in a way that gives you a solid lifting point, and the balance is a touch better, so shuffling it around garages or loading into a car feels more controlled. Still not fun. Just less cursed.
Where practicality really diverges is daily usability. The LAOTIE is happiest if you have secure ground-level storage, don't ride in heavy rain, and accept that you'll be doing your own checks and maintenance regularly. Water resistance is only rated for light splashes; winter commuters and those in rainy climates will be rolling dice every time the sky turns grey.
The Apollo's IP66 rating changes the game. Puddles, wet roads, steady rain - it simply copes, and crucially, the warranty isn't instantly void if it sees a raindrop. Add in the app (for custom settings and diagnostics), integrated Quad Lock phone mount compatibility, and better documentation, and living with it as a real vehicle - not just a weekend toy - becomes much more realistic.
If your "practicality" means "throw it in the car sometimes and otherwise roll it out of a garage", both can work. If it means "I commute in all sorts of weather and want something boringly dependable", the Apollo is the one that behaves like a transport tool, not a science experiment.
Safety
On scooters this fast, safety is not optional decoration; it's survival equipment. And here, the gap between these two is uncomfortably large.
The LAOTIE's hydraulic brakes are, on the face of it, entirely appropriate: twin disc stoppers with enough bite to haul the mass down from silly speeds. When they're correctly bled and adjusted, they're strong and predictable. Unfortunately, "when" is the operative word. Too many units arrive needing lever tweaks, rotor truing, or outright bleeding. Add in the somewhat abrupt electronic braking and you get a package that can stop very hard - but not always very gracefully.
Lighting is... enthusiastic. The front lights are bright and low-mounted, which is great for seeing the texture of the road right in front of you, less so for casting a long beam down a dark lane. Deck LEDs and turn signals make you conspicuous, but some indicators are hard to see in bright daylight. It's festive, highly visible at night, and a bit rough around the edges in actual signalling clarity.
Stability is the other half of safety, and this is where the LAOTIE demands respect. High-speed wobbles are a known topic in the community. A carefully tightened headset and correct tyre pressure help; a steering damper almost feels mandatory if you actually intend to use anywhere near top speed. Without that, you're depending a lot on your own death grip and reflexes.
The Apollo Phantom Stellar treats safety as a system, not an afterthought. The 4-piston hydraulic brakes up front and rear give you powerful, very controllable slowing with a light touch. You can trail brake into corners, scrub speed gently in traffic, or panic-stop without instantly locking everything. The additional regen throttle on the left turns everyday slowing into a smooth, predictable deceleration that keeps the scooter balanced and your braking distances shorter than you'd expect for something this heavy.
The built-in steering damper is a huge deal. It takes the sudden twitches and headshake out of the bar, especially over rough patches at speed. Combined with the wider tyres and better suspenders, the Apollo simply feels planted where the LAOTIE starts to feel edgy.
Lighting is more mature too: a high-mounted headlight that actually puts light where you're going, strong deck and side visibility, and overall a package that makes you visible without turning the scooter into a mobile disco. Add proper water resistance so you're not worrying about electrical gremlins every time the road is wet, and it's very clear which scooter I'd rather be on when traffic does something stupid in the rain.
Community Feedback
| LAOTIE Ti30-II Landbreaker | APOLLO Phantom 20 Stellar |
|---|---|
What riders love
|
What riders love
|
What riders complain about
|
What riders complain about
|
Price & Value
The Landbreaker's main weapon is price. For a bit over the four-figure mark, you get a gigantic battery, serious motors, hydraulic brakes and a metal frame that looks like it should cost more. On paper, it absolutely humiliates many Western-market offerings at twice the cost. For riders who are willing to be their own technicians and accept a certain "DIY kit" vibe, that's incredibly tempting.
The flipside is that part of what you're not paying for is consistency and refinement. You are effectively buying a platform: big components bolted together competently enough that an enthusiast can bring them the last stretch across the line. If you value your time, or you're not comfortable dismantling and checking a brand-new scooter, that "cheap" price becomes less straightforward.
The Apollo sits way up the price ladder, in territory where you could be looking at serious rival brands. It does not pretend to be cheap. What it offers instead is a more complete package: better cell quality and battery engineering, much more thought-through chassis and suspension, serious water resistance, and after-sales support that actually exists and speaks your language.
Is it a screaming bargain? No - but in this class, it doesn't have to be. It just has to justify its price by riding and lasting like a premium product. For most riders who ride daily or rely on the scooter as a genuine vehicle, the Apollo's "buy once, cry once" proposition is easier to swallow than the LAOTIE's "buy cheap, then invest sweat and parts".
Service & Parts Availability
LAOTIE is very much an online-direct brand. You're dealing with big marketplaces, overseas warehouses, and community support rather than local dealers. The upside is that the chassis is based on familiar generic components, so motors, throttles, controllers and even swingarms can often be sourced from third-party sellers. There's a strong modding community that has collectively figured out what breaks and how to fix it.
The downside is obvious: no guaranteed regional service network, variable warranty experiences, and the occasional game of "guess which connector this seller used on this batch". If something major fails, you might be shipping parts halfway across the world or arguing with a faceless support portal.
Apollo, by contrast, has built an actual support ecosystem, especially strong in North America and increasingly visible in Europe. You get branded parts, official documentation, and real humans on support lines. There are authorised service centres, and the design is not a one-off OEM shell; Apollo iterates on its own platform, so spares remain available across generations. You still need to maintain it, but you're not alone in the dark with a multimeter and a prayer.
If you enjoy being your own mechanic and sourcing parts is half the fun, the LAOTIE works. If you want someone else to have thought this through so you can just ride the thing, the Apollo is the safer bet.
Pros & Cons Summary
| LAOTIE Ti30-II Landbreaker | APOLLO Phantom 20 Stellar |
|---|---|
Pros
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
Cons
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | LAOTIE Ti30-II Landbreaker | APOLLO Phantom 20 Stellar |
|---|---|---|
| Motor power (rated / peak) | 2 x 2.800 W / 5.600 W | 2.400 W (dual) / 7.000 W |
| Top speed (claimed) | 85 km/h | 85 km/h (Ludo mode) |
| Realistic top speed (rider experience) | Over 70 km/h under good conditions | Around 70-80 km/h with strong stability |
| Battery voltage / capacity | 60 V / 35-38,6 Ah | 60 V / 30 Ah |
| Battery energy | ≈ 2.100-2.300 Wh | 1.440 Wh |
| Claimed range | 80-105 km (up to 140 km ideal) | 90 km (ideal) |
| Real-world range (mixed riding) | ≈ 60-80 km fast use | ≈ 50-65 km spirited use |
| Weight | 49 kg | 49,4 kg |
| Brakes | Dual hydraulic discs + EABS | 4-piston hydraulic discs + regen throttle |
| Suspension | Front dual shocks / rear spring | DNM dual hydraulic adjustable |
| Tyres | 11" tubeless pneumatic off-road | 11" tubeless pneumatic hybrid with PunctureGuard |
| Max load | 200 kg | 150 kg |
| Water resistance | IP54 | IP66 |
| Charging time (typical) | ≈ 5-6 h with dual chargers | ≈ 10 h with standard charger |
| Price (approx.) | 1.329 € | 3.212 € |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
Both of these scooters are overkill for the average commuter. The question is: do you want affordable overkill that you have to tame yourself, or refined overkill that's been thought through for you?
The LAOTIE Ti30-II Landbreaker is for the rider who looks at a big, slightly rough-edged machine and sees a project, not a problem. If your budget stops well short of what the Western premium brands are asking, you want massive range and power, and you're perfectly happy checking bolts, tweaking brakes and maybe adding a steering damper, the Landbreaker gives you a lot of scooter for the money. It's a blunt instrument, but a very effective one in the right hands.
The Apollo Phantom 20 Stellar is the choice for riders who demand that their fast scooter also behaves like a serious vehicle. You get better suspension, safer and more predictable braking, far superior weather protection, and a riding experience that remains composed even when you're pushing it. It's not cheap, and it's hardly featherweight, but as a package it feels far closer to "hop on and trust it" than "hop on and hope nothing lets go".
If I had to live with one of these day in, day out, riding real roads in real weather with real traffic, I'd pick the Apollo. It's simply the more complete, confidence-inspiring machine. The LAOTIE is impressive for what it costs and makes sense for mechanically minded riders on a tighter budget, but it never entirely shakes the sense that you're finishing a job the factory started.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | LAOTIE Ti30-II Landbreaker | APOLLO Phantom 20 Stellar |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ✅ 0,63 €/Wh | ❌ 2,23 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ✅ 15,64 €/km/h | ❌ 37,79 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ✅ 23,33 g/Wh | ❌ 34,31 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | Weight per km/h (kg/km/h)✅ 0,58 kg/km/h | ✅ 0,58 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ✅ 18,99 €/km | ❌ 55,85 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ✅ 0,70 kg/km | ❌ 0,86 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ❌ 30,00 Wh/km | ✅ 25,04 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ❌ 65,88 W/km/h | ✅ 82,35 W/km/h |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | ❌ 0,00875 kg/W | ✅ 0,00706 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ✅ 350,00 W | ❌ 144,00 W |
These metrics show, in purely mathematical terms, how efficiently each scooter turns euros, kilograms and watt-hours into speed and range. The LAOTIE dominates cost- and capacity-based ratios: you pay less per Wh, per km/h and per kilometre of range, and its large battery paired with dual charging gives it a much higher average charging power. The Apollo, by contrast, is stronger on power utilisation and efficiency: more power per unit of speed, less energy used per kilometre, and a better weight-to-power ratio, reflecting a more performance-focused, efficient design rather than a "bigger tank for less money" strategy.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | LAOTIE Ti30-II Landbreaker | APOLLO Phantom 20 Stellar |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ✅ Slightly lighter, marginal edge | ❌ Tiny bit heavier |
| Range | ✅ Bigger battery, goes further | ❌ Shorter real range |
| Max Speed | ❌ Feels sketchier near max | ✅ Stable even flat out |
| Power | ❌ Strong, but less peak | ✅ Stronger peak, better use |
| Battery Size | ✅ Much larger capacity | ❌ Smaller pack |
| Suspension | ❌ Harsher, less controlled | ✅ DNM hydraulics, plush |
| Design | ❌ Industrial, rough finish | ✅ Refined, integrated look |
| Safety | ❌ QC and wobble concerns | ✅ Brakes, damper, IP66 |
| Practicality | ❌ Weak water sealing, DIY | ✅ All-weather, app features |
| Comfort | ❌ Stiffer, more fatiguing | ✅ Smoother on bad roads |
| Features | ❌ Basic display, few extras | ✅ App, DOT display, Quad Lock |
| Serviceability | ✅ Generic parts, hackable | ❌ More proprietary pieces |
| Customer Support | ❌ Marketplace-level support | ✅ Brand network, real support |
| Fun Factor | ✅ Wild, raw adrenaline | ❌ Fun but more sensible |
| Build Quality | ❌ Feels "kit-like" out box | ✅ Solid, fewer rattles |
| Component Quality | ❌ Mixed OEM component feel | ✅ Higher-grade parts overall |
| Brand Name | ❌ Niche, bargain reputation | ✅ Established, aspirational |
| Community | ✅ Strong DIY mod scene | ✅ Active, brand-driven community |
| Lights (visibility) | ✅ Very flashy, noticeable | ✅ Bright, well laid-out |
| Lights (illumination) | ❌ Low, short throw | ✅ Higher, more usable |
| Acceleration | ❌ Brutal but less controlled | ✅ Brutal and predictable |
| Arrive with smile factor | ✅ Grin from bad behaviour | ✅ Grin from refined speed |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ❌ More tension at speed | ✅ Calm, composed ride |
| Charging speed | ✅ Faster with dual ports | ❌ Slower on stock charger |
| Reliability | ❌ QC variance, DIY fixes | ✅ Better QC, support |
| Folded practicality | ❌ Awkward bulk when folded | ✅ Better latch, carry point |
| Ease of transport | ❌ Heavy, clumsy to move | ❌ Also heavy, still awkward |
| Handling | ❌ Nervous at higher speeds | ✅ Stable, confidence inspiring |
| Braking performance | ❌ Strong but less refined | ✅ 4-piston + regen excellence |
| Riding position | ✅ Huge deck, versatile stance | ✅ Spacious, great kickplate |
| Handlebar quality | ❌ Generic, more flex | ✅ Stiffer, better controls |
| Throttle response | ❌ Jerky at low speed | ✅ MACH 3 smoothness |
| Dashboard/Display | ❌ Basic trigger display | ✅ Integrated DOT 2.0 |
| Security (locking) | ✅ Alarm and key fob | ❌ Standard, no alarm stock |
| Weather protection | ❌ Limited wet-weather confidence | ✅ True rain-capable IP66 |
| Resale value | ❌ Generic brand, drops faster | ✅ Stronger brand desirability |
| Tuning potential | ✅ Open platform, easy mods | ❌ More locked-down system |
| Ease of maintenance | ✅ Simple, generic parts | ❌ More specialised components |
| Value for Money | ✅ Massive specs per euro | ❌ Expensive, pays for polish |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the LAOTIE Ti30-II Landbreaker scores 7 points against the APOLLO Phantom 20 Stellar's 4. In the Author's Category Battle, the LAOTIE Ti30-II Landbreaker gets 14 ✅ versus 28 ✅ for APOLLO Phantom 20 Stellar (with a few ties sprinkled in).
Totals: LAOTIE Ti30-II Landbreaker scores 21, APOLLO Phantom 20 Stellar scores 32.
Based on the scoring, the APOLLO Phantom 20 Stellar is our overall winner. For me, the Phantom 20 Stellar is the scooter that feels genuinely reassuring when you twist the throttle and the world starts coming at you very quickly - it's fast, sure, but it's the calm, coherent way it deals with that speed that really wins you over. The Landbreaker is wild, occasionally brilliant and tremendous fun when it all comes together, but it always feels a little like you're riding something you finished building yourself yesterday. If you want a machine that thrills without constantly asking for forgiveness, the Apollo is the one that will keep you smiling for longer - both on the road and in the garage.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.