Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
The Kaabo Mantis King GT edges out the Apollo Phantom V3 as the more complete package: it goes further, hits harder, rides softer, and charges faster, all while usually costing a bit less. If you want maximum grin-per-kilometre with genuinely plush suspension and serious performance headroom, the Mantis is the safer bet.
The Apollo Phantom V3, however, still makes sense if you care more about ultra-smooth throttle control, refined software, and that clever separate regen brake than about outright muscle and range. It's the better fit for riders who want a very controlled, "civilised" fast commuter rather than a scooter that always feels ready for a track day.
Both are solid middle-weight performance scooters; neither is flawless, but each has a clear personality. Keep reading to see which one actually matches your roads, your body, and your nerves.
Stick around - the devil (and the fun) is in the details.
There's a particular type of scooter that keeps popping up in conversations with seasoned riders: big enough to feel like a real vehicle, small enough not to need a hoist to get into the boot, fast enough to be interesting, but not so insane that you start shopping for motocross armour. The Apollo Phantom V3 and the Kaabo Mantis King GT are both aiming squarely at that sweet spot.
On one side you've got the Phantom V3: a sharply styled, app-heavy "designed in Canada" machine that's all about smooth control and clever electronics. It's the scooter for riders who like their power served with manners. On the other, the Mantis King GT: Kaabo's response to years of feedback, a more traditional performance chassis with modern sine-wave brains and legitimately plush hydraulic suspension. It's for riders who care more about how it pulls and soaks up rubbish tarmac than about how pretty the app looks.
They're priced close enough and spec'd close enough that it's entirely reasonable to be torn between them. So let's dig in and see where each one actually delivers - and where the marketing gloss starts to rub off once you've done a few hundred kilometres.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
Both scooters sit in that "serious money, not yet totally ridiculous" bracket. They're aimed at riders who have outgrown rental toys and commuter sticks, and now want something that can replace a fair chunk of car trips: longer commutes, mixed urban routes, a bit of weekend fun, maybe the occasional countryside blast.
Performance-wise, they live in the same neighbourhood: dual motors, proper suspension, real brakes, and speeds that will have you side-eyeing your helmet choice. Neither is a featherweight, neither belongs on the bus at rush hour, and both will absolutely humiliate rental scooters at the lights.
They compete because a typical buyer with around two grand to spend will have both of these on their shortlist. One offers a more "tech brand" experience and meticulous throttle feel (Apollo), the other offers more battery, more punch and more comfort hardware for similar money (Kaabo). The trade-off is: do you want polish and software, or raw capability and range?
Design & Build Quality
In the flesh, the Phantom V3 looks like it escaped from a cyberpunk artboard: cast-aluminium frame, sharp angles, big central hexagonal display, orange springs shouting "look at me". The chassis feels dense and rigid underfoot, with very little flex when you rock it. Controls are mostly Apollo-specific parts, and the cockpit layout feels considered - nothing appears slapped on as an afterthought.
The Mantis King GT goes for a more classic performance-scooter silhouette: long, low deck with a pronounced rear footrest, tubular arms and a stem that looks less "spaceship" and more "serious hardware". The finishing is cleaner than older Kaabos - tidier cable routing, better welds, nicer paint. It still feels a bit more "industrial" than the Phantom, but not in a bad way; more like a well-made tool than a design object.
Build-wise, both are a clear step above budget dual-motor scooters. The Phantom's cast frame feels like a solid block; the Mantis has that forged-aluminium heft that inspires confidence when you hit bad tarmac. Where they diverge is in perceived refinement: Apollo's cockpit plastics and app integration feel more unified, while Kaabo's buttons and switchgear still have a slightly generic vibe in places. On the flip side, Kaabo gives you better suspension hardware and brakes, which for a vehicle like this arguably matters more than how pretty the menu animations are.
Ride Comfort & Handling
Long, rough city stretch, broken paving, a sprinkling of cobblestones - the sort of nonsense many European riders see daily. On the Phantom V3, the quad-spring suspension does a decent job of keeping the impacts civilised. It's clearly tuned for urban riding: enough travel to keep your knees from swearing at you, but not so soft that it wallows. Once you're above jogging pace, it feels reasonably composed, though sharp edges still make themselves known a bit more than you'd like for this price bracket.
Hop onto the Mantis King GT and the difference is obvious within a few hundred metres. The adjustable hydraulic suspension simply has more finesse. It reacts quicker to small bumps, doesn't bounce back as harshly, and you can actually dial it softer or firmer to match your weight and taste. On neglected tarmac or long, fast runs over patchy surfaces, the Mantis is the one that leaves you less fatigued. It feels closer to a small motorbike in how it eats imperfections, whereas the Phantom still feels like a well-sorted scooter.
In corners, both are confidence-inspiring once you trust them. The Phantom has a planted, slightly "heavy front" feel that encourages smooth, sweeping turns. The Mantis is more playful: the combination of wide bars, hydraulic suspension and strong mid-range torque makes it genuinely fun to flick from bend to bend. If you like carving S-curves on bike paths or fast countryside lanes, the King GT rewards that style more.
Performance
Neither of these is slow, and either one will make a rental Ninebot feel like it's running on AA batteries. But the way they deliver speed is different.
The Phantom's party trick is its MACH 1 controller. Throttle response is beautifully progressive - you can crawl through pedestrians at walking speed without any drama, then roll on and get a steady, linear push up to very illegal territory. In its sportiest mode it's quick enough to raise your eyebrows, but it never quite feels unhinged; even when it's pulling hard, there's a sense that the controller is smoothing your bad decisions.
The Mantis King GT, with its sine-wave controllers, manages to be smooth at low speed as well, but once you open it up it hits harder than the Phantom. From a standing start in the higher power modes, you really do need to lean forward and commit; it lunges in a way the Phantom doesn't quite match. Mid-range acceleration - the 20 to 50 km/h zone where overtakes happen - is especially strong. Top end feels a shade more effortless too; where the Phantom feels like it's working near its ceiling, the Mantis still has a bit of arrogance left.
Hill climbing is a non-issue on both for normal riders. Put a heavy rider on a steep, drawn-out climb and the Mantis holds speed more stubbornly, thanks to that beefier battery voltage and peak output. Braking-wise, the Phantom's mechanical discs plus separate regen throttle are clever and efficient, but once you've used a well-set hydraulic system like the Mantis' Zoom brakes, it's hard to un-feel that extra bite and modulation. The Kaabo simply stops with more authority for less hand effort.
Battery & Range
On paper, the Phantom's battery isn't tiny, but it's not exactly generous for this class either. Ride it like a typical owner actually will - brisk pace, dual motors on, some hills, occasional top-speed bursts - and you're looking at comfortable medium-distance daily use, but not epic touring. You start thinking about where the charger is after a couple of solid legs of spirited riding. It's fine for city commutes and evening fun, but if you're greedy with the throttle you will see the bar drop faster than you'd like.
The Mantis King GT simply packs more juice. In the same kind of "real rider" conditions, it tends to keep going noticeably longer. Where the Phantom has you calculating whether you can do a detour on the way home, the Mantis is more "yeah, go on then, one more loop". For riders who routinely do longer commutes, or who like to combine workday use with a decent weekend blast on a single charge, that extra buffer feels very reassuring.
Charging is another area where the Phantom feels a little old-school. With a single stock charger, you're very much in overnight territory from low battery. You can halve that with a second charger, but that's an extra expense and hassle. The Mantis, by contrast, typically ships with two chargers in the box and gets its larger battery topped up in about the same overnight window - or from mid to high much faster. If you use your scooter heavily several days in a row, the Kaabo's charging setup makes life easier.
Portability & Practicality
Let's be blunt: neither of these is "portable" in the normal sense. You can lift them, yes. You will not enjoy it.
The Phantom is the heavier of the two and, crucially, has fixed-width handlebars. Folded, it becomes a long, heavy barbell with a very wide top. Carrying it upstairs is a two-handed, swear-word-rich experience, and even just wrestling it into a narrow hallway or small car boot gets old quickly. The stem lock to the deck is solid, but the sheer bulk means this isn't a scooter for multi-modal commutes unless you really, really hate yourself.
The Mantis King GT is slightly lighter and folds into a marginally more manageable shape, though its handlebars aren't exactly slim either. It's still not a "train and office" companion, but for throwing into a car boot or moving around a garage, it's the less annoying of the two. Both scooters are happiest when they can roll straight into a ground-floor space or lift.
Day-to-day practicality is comparable: no built-in cargo options, decent but not miraculous kickstands, enough deck space to be comfortable in traffic. The Phantom's app gives it an edge for those who like to fine-tune settings or lock the scooter from their phone. The Mantis counters with better water protection and hardware that's more forgiving of bad roads. Choose your flavour of "practical".
Safety
Safety here is as much about how the scooter behaves as about how bright the lights are.
The Phantom scores well on thoughtfulness: the dedicated regen throttle on the left means you can slow down smoothly without touching the mechanical brakes most of the time, which not only saves pads but keeps the chassis nice and stable in traffic. The high-mounted headlight and wraparound indicators make you pleasantly visible, and the frame/stem combo does feel rock solid at speed - no hint of wobble when set up correctly.
The Mantis King GT leans more on classic safety hardware: powerful hydraulic brakes, a grippy hybrid tyre set-up, bright stem-mounted headlight, and a very stable geometry at higher speeds. There's no separate regen throttle, but the motor braking blends in smoothly when you pull the levers. At the speeds the Mantis can realistically hit, having hydraulics at your fingertips is a big confidence booster.
In grim weather, the Mantis' better water protection tips the scale. The Phantom will tolerate splashes, but you think twice before riding through heavy rain or deep puddles. On the Kaabo, occasional wet commutes feel less like gambling with the warranty.
Community Feedback
| Apollo Phantom V3 | Kaabo Mantis King GT |
|---|---|
What riders love
|
What riders love
|
What riders complain about
|
What riders complain about
|
Price & Value
With street prices fairly close, you have to look at what each scooter actually gives you for your euro. The Phantom sells itself on design, in-house electronics, and ecosystem: smart controller, polished app, proprietary chassis and cockpit. You're paying partly for that "Apollo experience", and if you're into tweaking settings and having everything feel tightly integrated, that does have value.
The Mantis King GT throws more of your money into hard parts: bigger battery, higher system voltage, hydraulic suspension, hydraulic brakes, faster stock charging. On a purely hardware level, it feels like you're getting more scooter for slightly less cash. The flipside is that some finishing touches - switches, mudguards - don't quite match the rest of the package's maturity.
In terms of long-term value, the Kaabo's extra range and stronger components are easier to appreciate day in, day out than the Phantom's somewhat nicer UI. If you're cold-blooded about value, the Mantis usually comes out ahead.
Service & Parts Availability
Apollo sells more like a "tech brand": direct presence in some markets, a focused line-up, and reasonably good parts support for current models. They've earned goodwill with things like upgrade kits for previous Phantoms. That said, depending on where you live, you may be dealing with fewer third-party shops that really know the platform inside-out.
Kaabo, by contrast, is everywhere. The Mantis platform has been around in various forms for years, and there's a healthy network of dealers, online parts sources, and YouTube tutorials. In Europe especially, getting a replacement brake calliper or suspension part for a Mantis tends to be easier and faster than sourcing Apollo-specific bits.
On the servicing bench, most mechanics are more familiar with Kaabo layouts than with Apollo's proprietary quirks. The Phantom isn't difficult to work on, but the Mantis is more "standard" in how it's put together, which often translates to cheaper and quicker fixes.
Pros & Cons Summary
| Apollo Phantom V3 | Kaabo Mantis King GT |
|---|---|
Pros
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
Cons
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | Apollo Phantom V3 | Kaabo Mantis King GT |
|---|---|---|
| Motor power (rated) | 2 x 1.200 W (2.400 W total) | 2 x 1.100 W (2.200 W total) |
| Motor power (peak) | 3.200 W | 4.200 W |
| Top speed (approx.) | ca. 66 km/h | ca. 70 km/h |
| Battery | 52 V 23,4 Ah (ca. 1.217 Wh) | 60 V 24 Ah (1.440 Wh) |
| Claimed range | ca. 64 km | ca. 90 km |
| Real-world range (mixed riding) | ca. 40-50 km | ca. 55 km |
| Weight | 35 kg | 33,1 kg |
| Brakes | Mechanical discs + regen throttle | Zoom hydraulic discs + EABS |
| Suspension | Quadruple spring (adjustable) | Adjustable hydraulic (front & rear) |
| Tyres | 10" x 3" pneumatic, tubed | 10" x 3" pneumatic hybrid |
| Max load | 136 kg | 120 kg |
| Water resistance | IP54 | IPX5 |
| Charging time (stock chargers) | ca. 12 h (single) | ca. 6-7 h (dual) |
| Approx. price | ca. 2.027 € | ca. 1.910 € |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
Both scooters aim for the same "Goldilocks" niche, but only one really lands there with confidence. The Apollo Phantom V3 is pleasant to ride, well thought-out, and its controller and regen system are genuinely nice pieces of engineering. If you're the type who values smoothness over brutality, loves deep app customisation, and rides mostly in the city at moderate speeds, it will do the job and you'll likely be satisfied - as long as you accept the weight and the slightly underwhelming battery for the price.
The Kaabo Mantis King GT, though, feels like it gives you more of what matters on the road: stronger acceleration when you ask for it, more comfortable suspension, better brakes, longer range, quicker charging and slightly better weather tolerance. It rides like a more serious machine without becoming a total monster to live with. If I had to pick one as a long-term daily plus weekend fun partner, the Mantis would get the keys.
So: choose the Phantom if you're a control geek who wants a very refined, software-driven ride and doesn't mind sacrificing some hardware value. Choose the Mantis King GT if you just want the scooter that will carry you further, faster, and more comfortably, with fewer "do I have enough battery for this?" moments. For most riders in this segment, the Kaabo is simply the more convincing compromise.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | Apollo Phantom V3 | Kaabo Mantis King GT |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ❌ 1,67 €/Wh | ✅ 1,33 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ❌ 30,71 €/km/h | ✅ 27,29 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ❌ 28,77 g/Wh | ✅ 22,99 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | ❌ 0,53 kg/km/h | ✅ 0,47 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ❌ 45,04 €/km | ✅ 34,73 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ❌ 0,78 kg/km | ✅ 0,60 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ❌ 27,04 Wh/km | ✅ 26,18 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ❌ 48,48 W/km/h | ✅ 60,00 W/km/h |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | ❌ 0,01094 kg/W | ✅ 0,00788 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ❌ 101,40 W | ✅ 221,54 W |
These metrics strip away emotion and look purely at efficiency and "value density". Price per Wh and per kilometre tell you how much you're paying for energy and usable range. Weight-related numbers show how much mass you haul around for each unit of battery, speed or distance. Wh per km reflects how thirsty each scooter is. Power-to-speed and weight-to-power hint at how hard the motors can shove you relative to their size. Average charging speed simply indicates how quickly you can refill the tank once empty.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | Apollo Phantom V3 | Kaabo Mantis King GT |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ❌ Heavier, tougher to carry | ✅ Slightly lighter overall |
| Range | ❌ Decent but not special | ✅ Noticeably longer real range |
| Max Speed | ❌ Fast but slightly lower | ✅ Higher top-speed headroom |
| Power | ❌ Softer peak punch | ✅ Stronger peak output |
| Battery Size | ❌ Smaller capacity pack | ✅ Larger, more usable pack |
| Suspension | ❌ Springs, less sophisticated | ✅ Adjustable hydraulic comfort |
| Design | ✅ Sharper, more cohesive look | ❌ More generic performance style |
| Safety | ❌ Weaker brakes, lower IP | ✅ Hydraulics, better water rating |
| Practicality | ❌ Bulkier, slower charging | ✅ Easier ownership overall |
| Comfort | ❌ Good, but less plush | ✅ Softer, more controlled ride |
| Features | ✅ App, regen throttle, display | ❌ Fewer software niceties |
| Serviceability | ❌ More proprietary parts | ✅ Common platform, easy parts |
| Customer Support | ✅ Direct brand, decent support | ❌ Varies by dealer heavily |
| Fun Factor | ❌ More restrained character | ✅ Punchier, more playful ride |
| Build Quality | ✅ Very solid chassis, feel | ❌ Great, but some cheap bits |
| Component Quality | ❌ Springs, mechanical brakes | ✅ Hydraulics, bigger battery |
| Brand Name | ✅ Strong, design-forward image | ❌ More utilitarian reputation |
| Community | ❌ Smaller, more niche base | ✅ Large, established Mantis crowd |
| Lights (visibility) | ✅ Great signals, wraparound | ❌ Good but less distinctive |
| Lights (illumination) | ❌ Good, but not standout | ✅ Very usable night lighting |
| Acceleration | ❌ Strong, but more gentle | ✅ Noticeably harder hit |
| Arrive with smile factor | ❌ Pleasant, not exhilarating | ✅ Grin-inducing most rides |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ❌ More vibration on bad roads | ✅ Plush, less body fatigue |
| Charging speed | ❌ Slow with single charger | ✅ Much quicker stock setup |
| Reliability | ❌ Some QC complaints linger | ✅ Mature platform, fewer issues |
| Folded practicality | ❌ Wide bars, awkward size | ✅ Slightly easier to stash |
| Ease of transport | ❌ Heavier, less cooperative | ✅ Still heavy, but better |
| Handling | ❌ Stable but less playful | ✅ Nimble, fun cornering |
| Braking performance | ❌ Mechanical, more hand effort | ✅ Hydraulics bite harder |
| Riding position | ✅ Comfortable, roomy deck | ✅ Also roomy, ergonomic |
| Handlebar quality | ✅ Feels premium, well finished | ❌ Wider, cheaper switchgear |
| Throttle response | ✅ Exceptionally smooth, precise | ❌ Smooth but more aggressive |
| Dashboard/Display | ❌ Stylish but sun visibility issues | ✅ Bright TFT, readable anytime |
| Security (locking) | ✅ App features, some deterrence | ❌ Standard, no extras |
| Weather protection | ❌ Lower IP, more caution | ✅ Better suited to rain |
| Resale value | ❌ Smaller market, niche | ✅ Popular, easier resale |
| Tuning potential | ❌ More closed ecosystem | ✅ Huge modding community |
| Ease of maintenance | ❌ Proprietary parts complicate | ✅ Standard components, simpler |
| Value for Money | ❌ Less hardware per euro | ✅ Stronger overall package |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the APOLLO Phantom V3 scores 0 points against the KAABO Mantis King GT's 10. In the Author's Category Battle, the APOLLO Phantom V3 gets 10 ✅ versus 30 ✅ for KAABO Mantis King GT.
Totals: APOLLO Phantom V3 scores 10, KAABO Mantis King GT scores 40.
Based on the scoring, the KAABO Mantis King GT is our overall winner. Riding these back-to-back, the Kaabo Mantis King GT just feels like the scooter that's trying harder to earn its keep: it goes further, hits harder, and smooths out bad roads in a way that makes you actually look forward to taking the long way home. The Apollo Phantom V3 has its charms - especially if you love silky throttle feel and clever regen - but it never quite shakes the sense that you're paying a premium for polish rather than for what you feel through your boots. If I had to live with one as my main fast scooter, it would be the Mantis: not because it's perfect, but because its strengths show up every single ride, in every dodgy pothole and every long stretch where the battery just keeps on going. The Phantom remains a respectable choice for control freaks and brand fans, but the Kaabo is the one that actually tempts you out for one more loop when you should already be home.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.

