Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
The Apollo Phantom V4 is the overall better scooter for most riders: it rides more refined, feels more planted at speed, is better thought-out as a daily vehicle, and comes from a brand with far stronger support and polish. The LAOTIE ES10P fights back with brutal value, a bigger battery, and wild performance per euro, but it expects you to be your own mechanic and to live with rough edges. Pick the Phantom if you actually commute and want something that behaves like a mature transport tool. Pick the ES10P if you're a mechanically minded thrill-seeker chasing maximum speed and range on a tight budget and you're willing to babysit it.
If you want the full story - including what starts to rattle first, which scooter feels safer when things get sketchy, and where the "bargain" stops being a bargain - keep reading.
Electric scooters have grown up. On one side you've got machines like the Apollo Phantom V4: purpose-designed frames, fancy displays, and a company that at least pretends it wants to be your long-term mobility partner. On the other, you've got scooters like the LAOTIE ES10P: big motors, huge battery, price tag that makes you suspicious, and a spec sheet written to melt Facebook groups.
I've put serious kilometres on both of these. One feels like a slightly overenthusiastic commuter tool; the other like a hot-rod built in a shed with a calculator and no adult supervision. Both can be fast, both can commute - but they do it with very different priorities.
If you're torn between "sensible power" and "cheap insanity", this comparison will help you decide which compromise you actually want to live with.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
On paper, the Phantom V4 and the ES10P live in the same broad universe: dual motors, real-world ranges that easily handle long commutes, and top speeds that will outrage your transport ministry. The price tags, though, are worlds apart. The Phantom sits firmly in the mid-high tier, while the ES10P sneaks in for roughly half the money.
They're natural rivals for riders who want more than a dainty 25 km/h rental clone, but aren't ready to commit to a fifty-kilogram monster scooter. Think power commuters, heavy riders, and weekend speed junkies who still need to get to work on Monday.
The Apollo is the "grown-up fast scooter" aimed at people who value design, stability and support. The LAOTIE is for riders who open a browser tab, sort by "most watts per euro", and grin. Putting them head to head shows exactly what you give up when you chase max specs, and what you don't necessarily gain by paying a premium.
Design & Build Quality
Pick up the Phantom V4 (or attempt to) and the first impression is of a single, cohesive object. The cast aluminium "skeleton" frame, integrated neck, and that spaceship-style hexagonal display all feel like a clean-sheet design. Cabling is mostly tucked away, welds look deliberate rather than hopeful, and the deck rubber is neatly integrated rather than stuck on.
The ES10P, by contrast, looks like it grew out of a parts catalogue - because it basically did. Exposed bolts, multi-piece brackets, generic stem, and the classic Chinese dual-spring swingarms: nothing here is unique, but most of it is robust enough if you're willing to stay on top of it. It's very "industrial functional": you can usually see exactly what broke and which bolt to swear at.
In the hand, the Phantom's controls feel more sorted. Switchgear is intuitive, the display is properly legible and solidly mounted, and the cockpit gives you the sense somebody actually rode prototypes before signing off. On the ES10P, the throttle/display unit feels cheaper and more fragile; drop the scooter once and it's often the first part to complain.
Build philosophy in one line: the Apollo is engineered to feel like a finished product; the LAOTIE is engineered to hit a price-point, and you're invited to finish it yourself with tools and Loctite.
Ride Comfort & Handling
The Phantom V4's suspension is its party trick. That quadruple-spring setup, combined with wide pneumatic tyres, gives a surprisingly composed ride. On broken city streets, it doesn't annihilate bumps like a full hydraulic system would, but it soaks up most of the nastiness before it reaches your knees. After a few kilometres of cobbles or cracked tarmac, you step off feeling mildly smug rather than shaken.
The ES10P also has proper front and rear suspension, but it's a simpler, spring-only affair with less finesse. Small bumps are handled well enough, and off-road style tyres take the edge off rougher surfaces, but at higher speeds it can turn a series of ripples into a bit of a pogo show. Think "works surprisingly well for the money", not "magic carpet".
In corners, the Phantom feels planted and predictable. The steering geometry and chassis stiffness inspire confidence; you lean it in and it responds cleanly without nervous twitchiness. Even approaching its top end, it tracks straight unless you do something silly.
The ES10P can also be stable, but the margin for error is thinner. At moderate speeds it's fine; push closer to its maximum and any play in the stem or folding joint makes itself known as speed wobble. Many owners end up shimming or adjusting the stem clamp, or adding a steering damper. Out of the box, I'm much happier descending fast on the Apollo than on the LAOTIE.
Deck comfort leans toward the Phantom too. Its deck is broader with a nicely shaped rear kickplate, so you can change stance over longer rides. The ES10P's deck is adequate, and the skateboard-style grip tape does its job, but big feet will find the Apollo's platform more forgiving.
Performance
Both scooters qualify as "fast enough to get you in trouble". The Phantom's dual motors deliver a smooth, muscular shove. In its sportiest mode it launches hard off the line, but the power delivery remains civilised. You can feather the throttle through slow traffic without accidentally head-butting a parked car. Cruising an urban ring road at bicycle-race speeds feels almost casual - the motors are just idling in their happy zone.
The ES10P, instead, wears its power on its sleeve. Kick it into dual-motor turbo and it lunges forward with far less subtlety. The square-wave controllers give it that distinct electric whine and a more abrupt initial hit. Once you're used to it, it's entertaining; for a new rider, it's the kind of scooter that teaches respect very quickly. Hill starts? It doesn't really have those; it just goes.
Top speed bragging rights marginally favour the LAOTIE, at least on the spec sheet. In the real world, you'll probably run out of sane road before either scooter runs out of speed. What matters is how they feel up there: the Phantom remains relatively calm and composed; the ES10P can feel a bit "light" and demands both hands and full concentration.
Braking flips the conversation. The ES10P's hydraulic discs have lovely lever feel and strong bite, backed up by aggressive electronic braking. They can feel a bit grabby until you learn to modulate, but there's no arguing with their stopping power. The Phantom's disc brakes (mechanical or hydraulic depending on trim) are strong and more progressive, but the overall system feels tuned more for control than outright violence.
For raw, headline performance, the ES10P is the bigger hooligan. For useable performance you can exploit every day without constantly thinking about what might loosen next, the Phantom is the more confidence-inspiring partner.
Battery & Range
Battery capacity is one of the few areas where the LAOTIE doesn't just compete with the Phantom, it overtakes and waves on the way past. That huge pack lets the ES10P chew through high-speed kilometres without its gauge plummeting like a stock-market crash. Ride it hard in dual-motor turbo and you still get a genuinely long, fast session before range anxiety sets in.
The Phantom's battery is slightly smaller on paper, but still firmly in "commute all week with a top-up" territory for most people. Ride it with a mix of brisk cruising and a few full-throttle bursts and the real-world numbers are respectable. Ride like you're late for every meeting and it will, of course, drain faster - but even then it's no slouch.
In efficiency terms, the Apollo tends to sip where the ES10P gulps. Its controller tuning and slightly lower peak pace make it easier to get decent range without thinking too hard. On the LAOTIE, every extended stint in full send noticeably takes a bite, though that massive battery means you can afford plenty of misbehaviour.
Charging is an overnight affair on both. With their battery sizes, you're not realistically fast-charging from empty in your lunch break anyway. The ES10P's larger pack takes longer on a like-for-like charger, so you feel it more if you forget to plug in. The Phantom's charging time is still chunky, but the range-to-charge ratio in everyday mixed riding feels slightly more forgiving.
Portability & Practicality
Let's be honest: neither of these is a "fold and hop on the tram" toy. They both live in the mid-thirties to low-thirties kilogram bracket, which is the "grunt and swear" range for most people.
The Phantom feels like what it is: a heavy, solid, single-piece frame. Carrying it up a set of stairs is a gym session, but the folding mechanism is reassuringly overbuilt. The triple-lock stem is fiddlier than some, yet once you've got the muscle memory, it becomes routine. Folded, it fits in a typical car boot, but you're not throwing it one-handed.
The ES10P is a touch lighter, and the folding handlebars genuinely help with storage in narrow spaces or small cars. The main folding joint is fairly conventional: clamp-style, under a lot of stress, and absolutely dependent on you checking it regularly. It works, but it doesn't give you the same sense of over-spec'd security that the Apollo does.
In day-to-day commuting, practicality swings toward the Phantom if you value "just ride and park". Its kickstand, deck rubber, fenders and ergonomics all feel more like a vehicle designed for city life. The LAOTIE is practical in the sense that it has the range and tyres to shrug off detours and bad surfaces, but you're living with more compromises: more noise, more bulk, and more regular tightening sessions.
Safety
Safety is where the Phantom quietly justifies a fair chunk of its price. High-speed stability is very good, the steering naturally self-centres, and the chassis does a good job of killing off wobble before it starts. You feel like you're riding on rails rather than balancing on a tuning fork. That alone reduces fatigue - and panic - over long, quick rides.
Lighting on the Apollo is also properly thought through. The integrated headlight sits high, actually lights the road ahead, and the side and deck lighting give you decent 360-degree presence. The rear indicators could be higher and brighter for daytime, but as stock systems go, it's one of the better ones in this class.
The ES10P fights back with sheer lumens - deck LEDs, headlight, rear light, indicators - you are not exactly stealthy at night. Side visibility is excellent. The problem is more about dynamic safety: at top speed, if you've got any slop in the stem or you hit a mid-corner pothole, you need to be on your game. Speed wobble reports are common enough that "fit a steering damper" lives near the top of the community advice list.
Braking, as mentioned, is a strong point for the LAOTIE thanks to its hydraulic setup. The Phantom's brakes are absolutely good enough when properly set up, but if you're measuring sheer deceleration in an emergency, the ES10P has the edge. However, overall safety isn't just about raw stopping distance - it's also about how confident and predictable the scooter feels before you need to test that distance, and that's where the Apollo feels more grown-up.
Community Feedback
| Apollo Phantom V4 | LAOTIE ES10P |
|---|---|
What riders love
|
What riders love
|
What riders complain about
|
What riders complain about
|
Price & Value
The headline: the ES10P costs roughly half what you'll pay for a Phantom V4. On a pure spreadsheet basis - watts, watt-hours and kilometres per euro - the LAOTIE annihilates it. You get more battery, similar or higher speed, dual hydraulic brakes, and perfectly usable suspension for the price of a mid-tier commuter from a big-box brand.
But there's value, and then there's ownership experience. The Phantom charges a premium for a more cohesive design, better out-of-the-box setup, more reliable QC, and a brand that actually has a support structure beyond "open a ticket with the warehouse and wait". For riders who don't own a torque wrench (and don't want to), that matters more than an extra twenty kilometres of flat-out range.
If your budget is tight and you're happy to treat your scooter like a project car, the ES10P is clearly the value king. If you see it as your daily vehicle rather than your weekend toy, the Phantom's higher upfront cost is easier to justify over the long term.
Service & Parts Availability
Apollo has official distribution, documented procedures, and some level of European support through partners and parts pipelines. It's not flawless - no scooter brand is - but when something breaks, there's usually a part number, a diagram, and a person whose job it is to care.
LAOTIE operates in the "factory direct" universe. Official service centres are basically your own garage and your chosen online retailer's support desk. The upside is that the ES10P shares components with a swarm of similar Chinese scooters, so you can find compatible controllers, throttles, brakes and suspension arms from multiple sellers at low cost. The downside is that diagnosis, fitment and warranty wrangling are on you.
If you're in Europe and want predictable support and easy, legitimate spare parts, the Phantom is the safer bet. If you enjoy scouring AliExpress for upgraded parts and regard tinkering as part of the hobby, the ES10P ecosystem will keep you busy and oddly satisfied.
Pros & Cons Summary
| Apollo Phantom V4 | LAOTIE ES10P |
|---|---|
Pros
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
Cons
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | Apollo Phantom V4 | LAOTIE ES10P |
|---|---|---|
| Rated motor power | 2.400 W dual hub | 2.000 W dual hub |
| Peak motor power | 3.200 W | n/a (higher than rated) |
| Top speed | ca. 66 km/h | ca. 70 km/h |
| Theoretical range | 72-80 km | 80-100 km |
| Real-world mixed range | ca. 40-55 km | ca. 50-60 km |
| Battery capacity | 52 V 23,4 Ah (1.216 Wh) | 52 V 28,8 Ah (ca. 1.494 Wh) |
| Weight | 34,9 kg | 32,0 kg |
| Brakes | Disc (mech./hyd.) + regen | Hydraulic discs + EABS |
| Suspension | Quadruple spring (front/rear) | Dual spring (front/rear) |
| Tyres | 10" pneumatic, on-road | 10" pneumatic, off-road tread |
| Max rider load | 130 kg | 120 kg (frame tested higher) |
| IP rating | IP54 | Not stated (effectively low) |
| Charging time | ca. 6-9 h | ca. 5-8 h |
| Price (approx.) | 1.779 € | 889 € |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
If you strip away the marketing noise, this boils down to one key question: do you want a finished vehicle, or a high-powered DIY kit that happens to arrive assembled?
The Apollo Phantom V4 is the more complete, calmer and ultimately safer package for everyday use. It rides better over rough city streets, feels more secure at realistic top speeds, and offers an ownership experience that doesn't demand a toolkit every weekend. It's not spectacularly good value on paper, but it is a scooter you can actually live with, rather than constantly babysit.
The LAOTIE ES10P, on the other hand, is almost comically good value if you judge by power and battery alone. For riders who are technically inclined, enjoy tinkering, and mainly want the biggest grin per euro, it's a blast. But you do pay for those savings with your time, attention, and tolerance for compromised refinement. It's a brilliant toy and a capable long-range machine, but as a fuss-free daily commuter, it shows its rough edges quickly.
My recommendation: if this will be your main transport and you care about long-term reliability, stability and support, lean toward the Phantom V4. If you already own tools, enjoy a bit of mechanical chaos, and smile at the idea of a budget rocket that occasionally needs a spanner to behave, the ES10P will happily enable your bad decisions.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | Apollo Phantom V4 | LAOTIE ES10P |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ❌ 1,46 €/Wh | ✅ 0,59 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ❌ 26,95 €/km/h | ✅ 12,70 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ❌ 28,71 g/Wh | ✅ 21,42 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | ❌ 0,53 kg/km/h | ✅ 0,46 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ❌ 37,45 €/km | ✅ 16,16 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ❌ 0,73 kg/km | ✅ 0,58 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ✅ 25,60 Wh/km | ❌ 27,16 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ✅ 36,36 W/km/h | ❌ 28,57 W/km/h |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | ✅ 0,01454 kg/W | ❌ 0,01600 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ❌ 162,13 W | ✅ 229,85 W |
These metrics look purely at maths, not ride feel. Price-per-Wh and price-per-km/h show how cheaply each scooter delivers battery and speed. Weight-normalised figures tell you how much mass you're hauling around for the performance and range you get. Wh per km reveals real-world efficiency; power-to-speed and weight-to-power hint at how strong and lively the drivetrain feels. Average charging speed indicates how quickly each scooter can refill its battery relative to its size.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | Apollo Phantom V4 | LAOTIE ES10P |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ❌ Slightly heavier overall | ✅ A bit lighter chunk |
| Range | ❌ Shorter real-world range | ✅ Bigger pack, goes further |
| Max Speed | ❌ Slightly lower ceiling | ✅ Higher top-end potential |
| Power | ✅ Stronger, more usable pull | ❌ Less power per speed |
| Battery Size | ❌ Smaller capacity pack | ✅ Noticeably larger battery |
| Suspension | ✅ More refined, more stable | ❌ Bouncier, less controlled |
| Design | ✅ Integrated, futuristic frame | ❌ Generic, bolted-together look |
| Safety | ✅ Better stability and lighting | ❌ Sketchier at top speed |
| Practicality | ✅ Better daily livability | ❌ Needs frequent tinkering |
| Comfort | ✅ Plush, less fatiguing | ❌ Harsher, more bouncy |
| Features | ✅ App, cockpit, extras | ❌ Basic, functional only |
| Serviceability | ✅ Documented, brand-backed parts | ❌ DIY, mixed-quality spares |
| Customer Support | ✅ Real brand support network | ❌ Retailer-based, limited help |
| Fun Factor | ✅ Fast, confidence-inspiring fun | ❌ Fun but more stressful |
| Build Quality | ✅ More solid, refined build | ❌ Rougher finish, more flex |
| Component Quality | ✅ Higher-spec cockpit, details | ❌ Cheap peripherals, plastics |
| Brand Name | ✅ Established, transparent brand | ❌ Factory-direct budget label |
| Community | ✅ Strong mainstream owner base | ✅ Active modder/DIY community |
| Lights (visibility) | ✅ Better integrated visibility | ❌ Bright but less coherent |
| Lights (illumination) | ✅ Strong headlight beam | ❌ Adequate, more showy |
| Acceleration | ✅ Strong yet controllable | ❌ Brutal, less refined |
| Arrive with smile factor | ✅ Grin without white-knuckles | ❌ Grin mixed with tension |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ✅ Less tiring, more composed | ❌ More demanding mentally |
| Charging speed | ❌ Slower refill per Wh | ✅ Faster relative charging |
| Reliability | ✅ Fewer issues out-of-box | ❌ Frequent bolt and seal work |
| Folded practicality | ❌ Bulkier, non-folding bars | ✅ Folding bars, easier stash |
| Ease of transport | ❌ Heavier, more awkward carry | ✅ Slightly lighter, narrower |
| Handling | ✅ More precise, planted | ❌ Less confidence at speed |
| Braking performance | ❌ Strong but less exotic | ✅ Hydraulic bite advantage |
| Riding position | ✅ Ergonomic bars and deck | ❌ Less refined cockpit |
| Handlebar quality | ✅ Sturdy, well-finished | ❌ Flimsier, fold-joint flex |
| Throttle response | ✅ Smooth, easy low-speed control | ❌ Jerky in aggressive modes |
| Dashboard/Display | ✅ Large, informative, premium | ❌ Basic, somewhat fragile |
| Security (locking) | ❌ No integrated key ignition | ✅ Key switch with voltmeter |
| Weather protection | ✅ IP rating, better fenders | ❌ Needs DIY sealing |
| Resale value | ✅ Holds value better | ❌ Budget brand depreciation |
| Tuning potential | ❌ Less mod scene, proprietary | ✅ Huge mod/parts ecosystem |
| Ease of maintenance | ✅ Better QC, fewer fixes | ❌ More wrenching required |
| Value for Money | ❌ Pricier for raw specs | ✅ Outstanding specs per euro |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the APOLLO Phantom V4 scores 3 points against the LAOTIE ES10P's 7. In the Author's Category Battle, the APOLLO Phantom V4 gets 28 ✅ versus 12 ✅ for LAOTIE ES10P.
Totals: APOLLO Phantom V4 scores 31, LAOTIE ES10P scores 19.
Based on the scoring, the APOLLO Phantom V4 is our overall winner. In the end, the Apollo Phantom V4 simply feels like the more complete machine - the one you trust in bad weather, on bad roads, or on a bad day. It may not win every spec-sheet duel, but it behaves like a proper vehicle rather than an experiment. The LAOTIE ES10P is wildly entertaining and astonishing for the money, yet it always feels a little one step away from needing a spanner. If you want to ride hard and sleep easy, the Phantom is the scooter that will quietly keep you happier, longer.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.

