Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
The Aprilia eSR2 is the stronger overall package: it rides more comfortably, feels more grown-up on real city streets, and backs up the looks with genuinely better suspension and stability. If you care about how your scooter behaves on broken tarmac, cobblestones, and tram tracks, the Aprilia is the safer, calmer choice.
The Globber E-Motion 27 only really makes sense if you prioritise a simple, kid-to-teen transition scooter with a safety-first feel and can live with modest range and a fairly basic ride. For short, flat school runs or small last-mile hops it will do the job, but it doesn't punch above its class.
If you want your daily rides to feel like transport rather than a compromise, read on - the differences between these two are bigger than their spec sheets suggest.
Electric scooters have reached the stage where "350 W, 25 km/h, around 15-20 km real range" is the new beige. On paper, the Globber E-Motion 27 and the Aprilia eSR2 look like twins: same power class, similar price, same legal top speed, both targeting that entry-to-mid commuter bracket.
But once you've actually spent weeks dodging potholes, tram rails and inattentive pedestrians on both, the family resemblance fades quickly. One feels like it grew up from a kids' scooter heritage. The other feels like someone shrunk a motorcycle engineer and locked them in a scooter lab with a suspension obsession.
The Globber is best described as "a sensible first electric scooter that happens to carry you to school or the station". The Aprilia is "a small urban vehicle that just happens to be a scooter". If you want to know which one you'll still like after the novelty wears off, keep reading.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
Both models live in that slightly painful price zone where you're paying enough that disappointment will sting, but not enough to enter true high-performance territory. They aim at teens, students and urban adults who want something better than a rental but aren't ready to lug around a 30 kg monster.
The Globber is clearly angled at riders graduating from kick scooters - think late teens, lighter adults, parents buying "something safe" as a first e-scooter. It leans heavily on the brand's kiddie-scooter reputation and promises ease of use, tidy folding and a low-stress experience.
The Aprilia eSR2, meanwhile, targets the style-conscious commuter: someone who cares about comfort and aesthetics and is willing to accept average range in exchange for an actually pleasant ride. It's for people whose roads are rough, not just rough "in theory".
They cost close enough and share broadly similar core specs that many buyers will cross-shop them. Same power and legal speed, different philosophies: one more toy-to-transport, the other more transport-with-a-racing-sticker obsession.
Design & Build Quality
Pick up the Globber and the first impression is: "Oh, that's... fine." The lines are clean, the black/titanium finish is pleasantly grown-up, the cables are tucked away reasonably well. The folding joint feels decently tight, and nothing screams "AliExpress special" at first glance. But look closer and you see where the budget has been carefully rationed: the components are adequate rather than inspiring, and the overall feel is more polished toy than serious machine.
The Aprilia eSR2, in contrast, unapologetically wants to be noticed. The racing livery, sculpted frame and integrated display look like they were drafted by the same people who sketch fairings for superbikes - because, in essence, they were. In the hands, the chassis feels denser, more cohesive. The stem is stout, the deck has a reassuring stiffness, and all the touch points - levers, grips, display surround - feel a notch more mature.
In terms of build philosophy, Globber plays to its roots: keep it light-ish, simple, and safe, with a patented hinge and solid rear tyre to survive teenage abuse. Aprilia goes the other way: spend effort on the rolling chassis and suspension, accept a bit more heft, and wrap it all in a body that looks like it escaped from a paddock.
If you're the sort who parks in the hallway and smiles when you walk past, the Aprilia scratches that itch. The Globber is more "functional object you don't mind leaving at the bike rack".
Ride Comfort & Handling
This is where the gap opens up dramatically.
The Globber relies on a single front shock and a compromise tyre setup: air-filled up front, solid out back. On smooth pavement it's pleasant enough - the front end takes the sting out of small joints and the air tyre helps with grip. But start throwing broken kerbs, cobblestones or rough bike paths at it and the rear end reminds you exactly what it is: a hard, solid wheel firmly bolted to the frame. After a few kilometres of ugly asphalt, your knees and ankles are filing formal complaints.
The Aprilia eSR2, on the other hand, feels like someone actually planned for cities to have terrible roads. Double suspension - proper forks at the front and shocks at the rear - combined with larger air tyres turn the same route into something you can ride daily without developing a chiropractor dependency. You still feel the road, but the sharp hits are rounded off before they reach your joints.
Handling follows the same pattern. The Globber's smaller front wheel and basic geometry make it nimble but a bit nervous at top speed on rough surfaces. Quick steering is great until the tarmac goes wavey, then you find yourself making lots of tiny corrections. The Aprilia's bigger tyres and more settled chassis feel calmer, especially when you're threading through traffic or carving around potholes. It tracks straighter, and small mid-corner bumps don't unsettle it as much.
On a glass-smooth cycle path, they're not worlds apart. On the surfaces people actually ride, the eSR2 is in another league.
Performance
Both scooters use motors in the same power class, and both are capped to the same legal top speed. The difference is in how they get there and how they behave when the road points upwards.
The Globber's motor delivers a gentle, progressive shove. It feels tuned for nervous first-timers: roll on the throttle and it eases you up to cruising speed without any surprises. It will pull a lighter rider along happily in the flat, and on moderate inclines it copes, but you can hear and feel it working hard once you're closer to its weight limit. On steeper hills, heavier riders will be contributing with their right leg more than they'd probably like.
The Aprilia's motor feels a touch more eager. Same class of power on the label, but the controller tuning gives it a crisper response. In the highest mode it steps off the line more decisively, and it hangs onto speed a bit better on grades. It's still not a hill-climbing monster - physics and local laws apply equally - but for an average-weight rider it feels less strained and more willing, especially in stop-start city traffic.
Braking performance follows the same theme. The Globber's electronic front brake plus mechanical rear setup is adequate and friendly; it won't startle new riders and does a decent job in the dry. The Aprilia's drum and rear system, combined with the grippier 10-inch tyres, deliver stronger, more progressive stops, especially in wet conditions where enclosure and rubber quality matter more.
If your daily life is flat bike lanes and careful, conservative riding, the performance difference is modest. If you live in a city with even mildly ambitious bridges or you like to accelerate with some conviction away from lights, the Aprilia feels like it has more in reserve.
Battery & Range
Here's where both scooters remind you they're commuters, not tourers.
The Globber runs a battery that's slightly smaller than the Aprilia's on paper, and you feel that in the real world. Ride it like most riders do - top mode, close to full speed, a few hills, mixed surfaces - and you're looking at the mid-teens in kilometres before the display starts hinting that you should be eyeing a socket. Gentle riders can stretch it further, but if you have a one-way daily push much beyond 8-10 km without charging at the other end, you're playing range roulette.
The Aprilia's marginally larger pack doesn't suddenly transform it into a distance machine, but you do get a bit more breathing room. Stay in the fastest mode and ride like a normal human, and you can generally squeeze a couple more kilometres out of it than the Globber before performance starts to sag. Ride in the middle mode and it becomes a fairly comfortable inner-city all-day runner, provided your trips are short and you top up at home.
Charging times are similar for both: plug them in at dinner and you'll wake up to a full battery. The Aprilia's charger is compact enough to keep in a backpack, which makes lunchtime top-ups more realistic. With the Globber, you'll also be charging frequently if you ride it hard, simply because of the smaller capacity.
In day-to-day terms: both are "last-mile plus errands" scooters. The Aprilia just gives you a slightly larger buffer before range anxiety kicks in, especially for medium-length commutes where you can't or don't want to charge at the destination.
Portability & Practicality
On the scales, they're in the same ballpark, and you feel it. This is the weight class where you can carry the scooter upstairs without writing your will first, but you don't want to be doing it repeatedly for fun.
The Globber's folding system is one of its nicer tricks. The patented hinge feels secure when locked and reasonably slick when folding. Once collapsed, it forms a compact, tidy package that's straightforward to stash under a desk or in a car boot. For students dragging it into lecture halls or parents shoving it in the back of a hatchback, that neatness matters.
The Aprilia also folds quickly and locks down well, but the handlebars stay full-width, which makes it slightly more awkward in very crowded trains or tight corridors. You do feel that extra visual bulk if you're weaving through a packed metro carriage. On the flip side, that generous width is part of why it feels so stable when you're actually riding.
Neither scooter is a featherweight "carry all day" model. If you live on the fifth floor without a lift, you'll get fitter whether you wanted to or not. For typical "carry briefly, ride longer" use - into a flat, onto a train, into an office - both are manageable, with the Globber having a small edge in compactness and the Aprilia winning once the wheels are rolling.
Safety
Safety is where their different design priorities really show.
The Globber leans on its kid-scooter DNA: dual-brake setup, speed modes with very tame lower limits, a safety-oriented throttle response and a high-grip deck. Everything is tuned to avoid surprises. For a nervous teenager or a parent hovering on the pavement watching, that's reassuring. The front suspension calms down smaller hits, and the mixed tyre setup gives you reasonable grip at the steering end.
The flip side is that the solid rear tyre compromises grip and braking traction on poor surfaces, and the smaller wheels are less forgiving when you hit deep holes or tram tracks at the wrong angle. It's safe at sensible speeds on decent paths - which is the intended use - but it doesn't give you a huge safety margin when things get messy.
The Aprilia, by contrast, builds its safety case on chassis and tyre competence. Bigger air-filled tyres with a more generous contact patch, proper suspension at both ends, sturdier frame, and stronger brakes: the result is a scooter that's less likely to get bounced off line, less prone to locking up, and generally more composed when you need to brake hard on dodgy surfaces. The lighting package, especially with turn signals on newer units, also does more to announce your presence and intentions in traffic.
If we're honest: both are limited to the same top speed, but the Aprilia simply gives you more safety "headroom" when the city does its usual chaos routine.
Community Feedback
| GLOBBER E-MOTION 27 | APRILIA eSR2 |
|---|---|
What riders love
|
What riders love
|
What riders complain about
|
What riders complain about
|
Price & Value
Neither of these is a bargain-bin scooter, and neither comes with numbers that will impress spreadsheet warriors.
The Globber asks a mid-range entry-level price while offering a smaller battery and a fairly basic ride experience. What you're mainly paying for is the brand's reputation in children's scooters, a decent folding design and a safety-oriented setup. For a parent prioritising "don't break, don't scare them", that might be acceptable. For a self-funding adult comparing it with similarly priced, more capable commuters, it starts to look thin on value.
The Aprilia is a bit more expensive, but you see more of that money out on the road: better suspension, bigger tyres, nicer chassis, more confident handling, app connectivity and more mature design. The battery still isn't generous, yet it feels like a more rounded vehicle rather than an upmarket first scooter.
Put bluntly: neither is a range-per-euro champion, but the Aprilia gives you more tangible quality and comfort for the price. With the Globber, you're paying relatively high money for relatively modest capability, softened by brand trust.
Service & Parts Availability
Service support matters more than people think - right up until the first brake lever snaps or a controller dies mid-season.
Globber, coming from the kids' segment, has decent distribution and parts in many European markets. Getting a new rear solid wheel or a hinge component is usually doable through official channels. Independent shops, however, may not always have Globber-specific spares on the shelf, and some e-bike mechanics will simply shrug at a brand they associate with toys rather than transport.
Aprilia's partnership with MT Distribution gives the eSR2 a more grown-up support ecosystem. Parts are available through an established network, and the brand recognition helps: workshops are more inclined to touch something with a known name on the deck. The app and "virtual garage" approach also make firmware and diagnostics slightly less mysterious than on many generic scooters.
In practice, neither is a nightmare to keep running, but the Aprilia sits closer to the "proper vehicle" end of the service spectrum, especially in larger European cities.
Pros & Cons Summary
| GLOBBER E-MOTION 27 | APRILIA eSR2 |
|---|---|
Pros
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
Cons
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | GLOBBER E-MOTION 27 | APRILIA eSR2 |
|---|---|---|
| Motor rated power | 350 W | 350 W (peak ca. 600 W) |
| Top speed | 25 km/h | 25 km/h |
| Claimed range | 25-28 km | up to 25 km |
| Real-world range (est.) | ca. 15-18 km | ca. 15-18 km |
| Battery | 36 V 7,5 Ah (ca. 270 Wh) | 36 V 8,0 Ah (288 Wh) |
| Weight | 16,5 kg | 16,5 kg (net) |
| Brakes | E-ABS front + rear mechanical | Front drum + rear disc/electronic (KERS) |
| Suspension | Front only | Front and rear |
| Tyres | 8,5" front pneumatic, rear solid | 10" pneumatic, front & rear |
| Max load | 100 kg | 100 kg |
| IP rating | n/a specified | IPX4 |
| Price (approx.) | 546 € | 598 € |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
If both scooters sat side by side in a shop and I had to pick one to live with for a year of real commuting, I'd walk out with the Aprilia eSR2. It simply behaves like a more complete vehicle: more comfortable on bad roads, more composed at speed, better braking, and a design that doesn't make you feel like you borrowed your kid's ride. Yes, the range is nothing to brag about, but within its intended use it delivers a more relaxed, grown-up experience.
The Globber E-Motion 27 has its place, but it's a narrow one. As a first e-scooter for a teenager, or as a short-hop campus or station shuttle for a lighter rider, it's fine - easy to use, pretty compact, and backed by a brand parents tend to trust. But when you look at what you're paying, and then you hit a few rough kilometres of real city, it starts to feel more like an expensive stepping stone than a scooter you'll want to keep long term.
So: if your rides are short, flat and you're buying for a younger, cautious rider, the Globber will do what it says on the tin. If you're an adult who actually relies on a scooter to get around a real European city, the Aprilia eSR2 is the one that will get you there with less drama - and with your spine and dignity intact.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | GLOBBER E-MOTION 27 | APRILIA eSR2 |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ✅ 2,02 €/Wh | ❌ 2,08 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ✅ 21,84 €/km/h | ❌ 23,92 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ❌ 61,11 g/Wh | ✅ 57,29 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | ✅ 0,66 kg/km/h | ✅ 0,66 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ✅ 32,12 €/km | ❌ 35,18 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ✅ 0,97 kg/km | ✅ 0,97 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ✅ 15,88 Wh/km | ❌ 16,94 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ✅ 14,00 W/km/h | ✅ 14,00 W/km/h |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | ✅ 0,047 kg/W | ✅ 0,047 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ❌ 49,09 W | ✅ 52,36 W |
These metrics look purely at cost, weight, energy and charging in a mathematical vacuum. Price per Wh and per km/h tell you how much you pay for each unit of battery or top speed. Weight-related metrics show how heavy the scooter is relative to its battery, performance and range. Wh per km reflects how efficiently each scooter uses its battery in motion. Power-to-speed and weight-to-power indicate how "strong" the motor system is relative to speed and mass, while average charging speed shows how quickly the charger refills the battery. None of this captures ride comfort or handling - it's just the cold arithmetic side of the story.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | GLOBBER E-MOTION 27 | APRILIA eSR2 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ✅ Slightly neater, similar mass | ❌ Bulkier footprint folded |
| Range | ❌ Slightly smaller battery | ✅ Tiny edge, similar real use |
| Max Speed | ✅ Same cap, no worse | ✅ Same cap, no worse |
| Power | ❌ Feels more strained loaded | ✅ Stronger feel, better tune |
| Battery Size | ❌ Smaller capacity overall | ✅ Slightly larger, more buffer |
| Suspension | ❌ Front only, basic | ✅ Proper front and rear |
| Design | ❌ Functional, slightly bland | ✅ Striking, cohesive, premium |
| Safety | ❌ Smaller wheels, solid rear | ✅ Bigger tyres, better chassis |
| Practicality | ✅ More compact when folded | ❌ Wider bars, bulkier |
| Comfort | ❌ Rear solid tyre punishes | ✅ Plush, truly city-ready |
| Features | ❌ No app, basic extras | ✅ App, signals, better dash |
| Serviceability | ❌ Kid-brand image limits shops | ✅ More "vehicle" workshop appeal |
| Customer Support | ✅ Established family brand network | ✅ MT / Aprilia support grid |
| Fun Factor | ❌ Feels tame, outgrown fast | ✅ Sportier feel, more grin |
| Build Quality | ❌ Good, but a bit "toyish" | ✅ More solid, mature feel |
| Component Quality | ❌ Adequate, nothing special | ✅ Better suspension, controls |
| Brand Name | ❌ Kids' scooters association | ✅ Strong motorcycle heritage |
| Community | ❌ Smaller enthusiast presence | ✅ Bigger fanbase, more chatter |
| Lights (visibility) | ❌ Basic, functional only | ✅ Strong LEDs, indicators |
| Lights (illumination) | ❌ Adequate but unremarkable | ✅ Better beam and spread |
| Acceleration | ❌ Very gentle, slightly dull | ✅ Crisper, more responsive |
| Arrive with smile factor | ❌ Functional, not exciting | ✅ Feels special every ride |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ❌ Harsher on rough surfaces | ✅ Suspension saves your body |
| Charging speed | ❌ Slightly slower per Wh | ✅ Marginally quicker refill |
| Reliability | ✅ Simple, fewer fancy bits | ✅ Robust chassis, known parts |
| Folded practicality | ✅ Slimmer, easier to stash | ❌ Wide bars, awkward spaces |
| Ease of transport | ✅ Better in tight public transport | ❌ Bulkier to manoeuvre folded |
| Handling | ❌ Twitchier, less composed | ✅ Stable, confidence-inspiring |
| Braking performance | ❌ Adequate, not standout | ✅ Stronger, more progressive |
| Riding position | ❌ Fixed bar, less ergonomic | ✅ Comfortable, natural stance |
| Handlebar quality | ❌ Functional, a bit basic | ✅ Wider, nicer cockpit |
| Throttle response | ❌ Very soft, slightly dull | ✅ Snappier yet controllable |
| Dashboard/Display | ❌ Simple LCD, nothing fancy | ✅ Large, integrated, modern |
| Security (locking) | ❌ No extra features | ❌ No real advantage either |
| Weather protection | ❌ Unclear rating, basic | ✅ IPX4, predictable behaviour |
| Resale value | ❌ Niche appeal, kids' image | ✅ Stronger brand on used market |
| Tuning potential | ❌ Limited interest, ecosystem | ✅ More enthusiast attention |
| Ease of maintenance | ✅ No rear flats, simpler | ❌ Tubes, brake adjustments |
| Value for Money | ❌ Pricey for what you get | ✅ Comfort and quality justify |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the GLOBBER E-MOTION 27 scores 8 points against the APRILIA eSR2's 6. In the Author's Category Battle, the GLOBBER E-MOTION 27 gets 8 ✅ versus 33 ✅ for APRILIA eSR2 (with a few ties sprinkled in).
Totals: GLOBBER E-MOTION 27 scores 16, APRILIA eSR2 scores 39.
Based on the scoring, the APRILIA eSR2 is our overall winner. Between these two, the Aprilia eSR2 is the scooter that actually feels like it was built for adults who ride every day, not just for teenagers who are upgrading from a kick toy. It's calmer, more comfortable, and simply more satisfying to live with, even if the numbers on paper don't scream "bargain". The Globber E-Motion 27 will get you from A to B, but the Aprilia is far more likely to make you look forward to the trip rather than just tolerate it - and that difference is what counts when the scooter stops being new and just becomes part of your life.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.

