Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
The JOYOR S5 edges out as the more complete scooter if you prioritise power, off-roadish capability and a more planted, "serious vehicle" feel - it simply pulls harder, rides bigger, and shrugs off bad surfaces with fewer excuses. The AUSOM GX1, however, fights back with better tech touches, more efficient battery use, quicker charging, and a friendlier, more refined commuter character that's easier to live with day to day. Choose the S5 if your routes include broken tarmac, hills and the occasional gravel adventure; pick the GX1 if you mainly ride city streets, care about comfort and value, and want something practical rather than macho.
Both can be great, but for most urban riders who count euros and watt-hours, the AUSOM GX1 quietly makes more long-term sense. Stick around and we'll unpack why the "sensible" choice might actually be the one that keeps you happiest.
Electric scooters have grown up. Where we once had flimsy aluminium twigs on tiny tyres, we now get "crossover" machines with real suspension, fat rubber and enough torque to make your old city bike feel deeply inadequate. The AUSOM GX1 and JOYOR S5 sit right in the eye of that storm: affordable, full-suspension commuters with biggish batteries that promise to replace your bus pass, not just complement it.
I've ridden both over the usual European mix of bike lanes, awful cobblestones, sneaky tram tracks and the sort of "temporary" road works that have clearly been there since the Roman Empire. On paper they're close rivals; on the road, their personalities are surprisingly different. One is the pragmatic, techy commuter that quietly does most things right. The other is the louder, more muscular sibling that looks ready for an apocalypse - and occasionally rides like it.
If you're trying to decide where to put your roughly 500 € budget, this is a duel worth watching. Let's get into who these scooters are really for, and which compromises you'll actually feel once you're out of the spec sheet and into the street.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
Both the AUSOM GX1 and JOYOR S5 live in that sweet spot between rental-style toys and true performance monsters. Think "serious commuter with ambitions", not "race scooter". Prices hover in the same region, they both use 48 V systems, both offer real suspension front and rear, and both claim ranges long enough that you can get lost and still make it home without panic.
They're aimed at riders who've either suffered through a basic Xiaomi-class scooter and swore "never again", or first-timers who already know they want more than a bare-bones stick on wheels. You want comfort, proper lights, decent brakes and something that won't fold in half the first time it meets a pothole. On that front, they absolutely are competitors.
The big difference is character: the JOYOR S5 leans into "rugged, power-commuter bordering on light off-roader". The AUSOM GX1 is more "refined city tool with some extra comfort". If your daily ride is a war zone, one has the advantage. If it's mostly bike lanes and patched tarmac with the occasional nasty surprise, the other will quietly fit your life better.
Design & Build Quality
Pick up the AUSOM GX1 and the first impression is: compact, tidy, and more premium than the price suggests. The forged aluminium frame feels dense rather than hollow, with a surprisingly clean finish for a budget scooter. Welds and paint are respectable, there's very little rattle, and the circular colour display plus NFC lock give it a modern, slightly tech-nerdy vibe. It feels like something designed by commuters, not just by accountants.
The JOYOR S5, by contrast, shouts instead of whispers. That orange swingarm, the chunky 10-inch tyres and the broad stance all scream "I lift". The frame is also aluminium, but the design is more industrial - edges are sharper, it looks more like a stripped-down small motorbike than a scooter. Standing on it, you instantly get that "I'm on a machine" feeling rather than "I'm on a gadget". Tolerances and general build are decent, but it doesn't feel quite as polished in the small details: cable routing, fender fittings and the folding latch all feel a bit more utilitarian.
In the hands, the GX1 is the more refined object: nicer finish, better integration of tech, fewer things that feel like they'll need tweaking with a hex key later. The S5 counters with sheer physical presence and robustness, but you can tell a bit more of the budget went into motor and hardware than little niceties.
Ride Comfort & Handling
Both scooters come with proper front and rear swingarm suspension and fat tyres, and both are worlds away from the jackhammer experience of solid-tyre commuters. But the way they ride is not identical.
The AUSOM GX1, with its slightly smaller 9-inch city tyres, feels surprisingly plush for its size. Over typical urban abuse - cracked tarmac, paving stones, random drainage covers - it takes the edge off nicely. It's not a magic carpet, but after several kilometres of nasty sidewalks I still had knees and wrists that weren't plotting revenge. The suspension is tuned on the softer, comfort-oriented side, which suits its commuter brief. Handling is nimble, easy to thread through busy cycle lanes, and the adjustable handlebar makes it simple to dial in a relaxed riding stance.
The JOYOR S5, on bigger 10-inch tyres, feels like a size up in class. The wide deck and geometry give it a more planted, almost mini-moped stance. On rougher surfaces - gravel paths, hard-packed dirt, truly broken asphalt - the extra wheel size and travel are noticeable. You can hit stuff on the S5 that I'd approach more gently on the GX1 and get away with it. The flip side is that at low speeds in tight city spaces, the S5 feels bulkier and a bit less flickable; it's more comfortable powering through a rough shortcut than weaving delicately through pedestrians.
In everyday city riding, the GX1 actually feels more civilised and relaxing. The S5 rides bigger and more capable, but you do pay for that with a slightly more "heavy-duty" feel in tight manoeuvres and a bit more noise from the suspension as kilometres add up.
Performance
Power delivery is where these two really diverge in character.
The AUSOM GX1's rear motor sits in that mid-range commuter bracket. It gets you briskly up to its legal-limit top speed with a smooth, progressive push. No drama, no arm-yanking, just a steady build that suits busy bike lanes and mixed traffic. Off the line, it feels confident enough that you're not holding up cyclists, but it never turns into a handful. On hills, it behaves like a reasonably fit rider on an e-bike: it doesn't sprint uphill, but it doesn't give up easily either, especially while the battery is above halfway.
The JOYOR S5, with its beefier rear motor and higher peak output, has noticeably more punch. Once you're rolling, a full thumb of throttle gives a stronger, more urgent surge - particularly helpful if you're a heavier rider or carrying a backpack. Short steep climbs that make smaller scooters wheeze are dispatched with less drama, and on long inclines the S5 keeps its dignity for longer before slowing. The acceleration curve is slightly tamed at very low speed, then builds quite assertively, which can catch new riders out if they're ham-fisted with the throttle.
Braking reflects the same difference in philosophy. The GX1 uses dual drum brakes with electronic assistance. They're not spectacular in initial bite, but they're progressive, very predictable and low-maintenance - ideal for wet commutes and riders who don't want to constantly fiddle with caliper alignment. The S5's dual mechanical discs bite much harder. When correctly adjusted they stop very effectively, but the first rides often involve a few "whoa, that's grabby" moments until you adapt or fine-tune cable tension.
In pure power and hill performance, the S5 has the upper hand. In everyday, stop-start city use where predictability is king, the GX1's calmer character and gentler brakes are arguably easier to live with - especially if you're not chasing thrills on the way to the office.
Battery & Range
On the spec sheet, the AUSOM GX1 packs the larger battery, and you feel that in real life. It simply goes further on a charge. Ridden briskly, you can abuse the throttle and still squeeze out a respectable commute both ways without nursing it. If you calm down a bit and stick to moderate speeds, it turns into a genuine range buddy, the sort of scooter where you start to forget when you last charged it.
The JOYOR S5 carries a slightly smaller pack. Real-world reports and my own riding line up: it will comfortably handle medium-length commutes and some detours, but if you ride it hard, using that extra motor muscle and exploring every tempting side path, the battery gauge starts dropping faster. It's perfectly adequate for most daily riders, but it's not the kind of scooter you take on an impulsive long detour when you're already low on charge.
Charging is another area where AUSOM quietly did their homework. With dual charging ports, the GX1 goes from flat to full in a working half-day if you use two chargers, or overnight with one; that makes heavy weekly use much easier. The JOYOR S5 charges in a more conventional overnight slot. Perfectly fine, but less flexible if you're a high-mileage rider or a forgetful plug-inner.
Range anxiety is simply lower on the GX1. The S5 is acceptable, but if you're the type who always pushes things "a little further", the AUSOM gives you a more forgiving safety margin.
Portability & Practicality
On the scales, both are in the same rough weight class - that awkward middle ground where you can carry them up a flight of stairs, but you won't enjoy doing it repeatedly. In the hands, however, they don't feel identical.
The AUSOM GX1 folds into a slimmer, more compact package. The stem mechanism is straightforward and locks down solidly, and once folded the scooter is genuinely office-friendly: under a desk, behind a door, in a boot without much Tetris. The adjustable handlebar helps shorter riders keep leverage and control when wheeling it in tight corridors. For multi-modal commutes where you occasionally take a train or shove it in a car, the GX1 feels designed with that reality in mind.
The JOYOR S5, when folded, is shorter but bulkier. The wide bars, chunkier tyres and heavier duty latch make it more of a "foldable vehicle" than a "foldable object". The stem lock is reassuringly solid but stiff when new, and manhandling the S5 in and out of car boots or up stairs feels more effortful. technically you can do all the same things you can with the GX1, but you'll be more aware you're moving a hunk of scooter rather than a sleek commuter tool.
For pure practicality - carrying, storing, integrating into a normal life that still includes stairs, small lifts and narrow hallways - the AUSOM has the edge. The Joyor favours those who mostly roll from ground floor to ground floor.
Safety
Both scooters take lighting seriously, which is refreshing. The AUSOM GX1 lights up like a small Christmas parade: strong headlight that actually shows you upcoming potholes, bright side LEDs and integrated turn signals. At night in town, you feel properly visible from all angles. The JOYOR S5 also brings a robust light package: a meaningful front light, rear light, signals and side visibility - enough that drivers tend to notice you rather than guess.
Where they really differ is braking philosophy. The JOYOR S5's dual disc setup gives serious stopping power when dialled in, which is reassuring if you ride fast in mixed traffic or on rougher surfaces where you may need to scrub speed quickly. But the tuning out of the box can feel abrupt, and poor adjustment easily turns them into squeaky, grabby anchors. It's great performance, but it assumes you're either mechanically comfortable or willing to learn.
The AUSOM GX1's drum-plus-E-ABS approach feels calmer and more commuter-friendly. You trade some ultimate bite for consistency in all weather and almost zero faff. There's also less chance of accidentally locking a wheel on loose surfaces because of the electronic modulation.
Both scooters are stable at their capped speeds, thanks to those wide tyres and stout frames. The S5 feels more planted blasting over really dismal surfaces; the GX1 feels more composed threading through busy cycle lanes and sudden manoeuvres around wandering pedestrians.
Community Feedback
| AUSOM GX1 | JOYOR S5 |
|---|---|
What riders love
|
What riders love
|
What riders complain about
|
What riders complain about
|
Price & Value
Both scooters live in roughly the same price neighbourhood, but they spend their budgets differently.
The AUSOM GX1 leans into battery size, practical features and general refinement: larger pack, NFC security, extensive lighting, quick charging, adjustable ergonomics. You feel like you're getting a very complete commuter - not glamorous, but extremely competent. Per euro, especially if you look at energy capacity and real-world range, it punches above its weight.
The JOYOR S5 spends a bit more of the budget on motor strength, larger wheels and heavy-duty hardware. If what you care about most is torque and the ability to bash through rougher environments, it offers good bang for your buck in that niche. Where it feels a little less convincing is long-term running efficiency and small-detail polish - the sort of things you only start noticing after a couple of months of daily use.
If you're simply chasing the sensation of power and big-scooter stance for not much money, the S5 is tempting. If you're counting the total cost of commuting over years - energy use, practicality, "does this still feel nice on a Wednesday in November?" - the GX1 is the smarter buy.
Service & Parts Availability
Joyor has had a head-start in Europe. The S5 benefits from a reasonably established distribution and parts chain, and there are plenty of third-party tutorials and spares floating around. Brake pads, tyres, fenders - all the consumables you'll actually wear out - are easy enough to source, and any bike or scooter shop that has seen a few disc-brake commuters will manage basic work on it.
AUSOM is newer and plays the disruptor. Officially, they offer decent warranties and replacement parts, but community reports on response times are mixed: some riders get fast action, others feel they're shouting into a void for a bit. That said, the GX1 uses mostly sensible, non-exotic components, so general maintenance isn't a dark art. A mechanically inclined owner won't be stuck, but someone who depends heavily on first-class dealer support might feel more comfortable with Joyor's more established footprint.
Pros & Cons Summary
| AUSOM GX1 | JOYOR S5 |
|---|---|
Pros
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
Cons
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | AUSOM GX1 | JOYOR S5 |
|---|---|---|
| Motor power (rated) | 500 W rear | 600 W rear |
| Top speed (capped) | 25 km/h (20 km/h DE) | 25 km/h |
| Realistic range (approx.) | ca. 42-60 km | ca. 35-45 km |
| Battery | 48 V 15,6 Ah (748,8 Wh) | 48 V 13 Ah (624 Wh) |
| Weight | 22,4 kg | 22,5 kg |
| Brakes | Front & rear drum + E-ABS | Front & rear mechanical disc |
| Suspension | Front & rear swingarm | Front & rear swingarm |
| Tyres | 9 x 3,0-inch pneumatic | 10-inch x 3,0-inch pneumatic |
| Max load | 120 kg | 120 kg |
| IP rating | IP54 | IP54 (typical for model) |
| Charging time | 4-5 h (dual) / ca. 10 h (single) | 5-7 h |
| Approx. price | 499 € | 516 € |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
If your riding life is mostly urban - bike lanes, mixed city streets, the occasional badly maintained shortcut - the AUSOM GX1 is the scooter that will quietly keep you happiest. It's more efficient, easier to live with, better equipped in the small conveniences that matter after month three, and its comfort-oriented tuning makes daily rides feel less like a workout and more like a glide. It doesn't shout about performance, but for real commuters, it delivers where it counts.
The JOYOR S5 makes more sense if you're a heavier rider, tackle proper hills every day, or your routes genuinely include rough tracks and broken surfaces where that extra grunt and bigger rubber pay off. It's the more muscular, more playful option - but also the one that demands a bit more tolerance for quirks, noise and maintenance.
For most riders spending their own money and using their scooter as a daily tool, I'd steer you toward the AUSOM GX1 as the more rounded, future-proof choice. If you know you want that extra punch and are happy to accept a slightly rougher, more "mechanical" ownership experience, the JOYOR S5 can still be a satisfying partner in crime.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | AUSOM GX1 | JOYOR S5 |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ✅ 0,67 €/Wh | ❌ 0,83 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ✅ 19,96 €/km/h | ❌ 20,64 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ✅ 29,91 g/Wh | ❌ 36,06 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | ✅ 0,896 kg/km/h | ❌ 0,9 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ✅ 9,98 €/km | ❌ 12,9 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ✅ 0,448 kg/km | ❌ 0,5625 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ✅ 15,0 Wh/km | ❌ 15,6 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ❌ 20 W/km/h | ✅ 24 W/km/h |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | ❌ 0,0448 kg/W | ✅ 0,0375 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ✅ 150 W | ❌ 104 W |
These metrics boil the scooters down to pure maths. Price per Wh and per kilometre show how much you pay for stored energy and real-world distance. Weight-related metrics tell you how efficiently each scooter uses its mass relative to power, speed and range. Wh per km reflects energy efficiency on the road. Power-to-speed and weight-to-power illustrate how "muscular" the drivetrain is, while average charging speed reveals how fast you can realistically get back on the road from empty.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | AUSOM GX1 | JOYOR S5 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ✅ Slightly better balanced | ❌ Feels bulkier to move |
| Range | ✅ Goes further per charge | ❌ Shorter real range |
| Max Speed | ✅ Same cap, calmer ride | ✅ Same cap, more headroom |
| Power | ❌ Adequate but modest | ✅ Noticeably stronger motor |
| Battery Size | ✅ Larger, more capacity | ❌ Smaller pack |
| Suspension | ✅ Softer, city-friendly tune | ✅ Very capable, more travel |
| Design | ✅ Cleaner, more refined | ❌ Rugged but less polished |
| Safety | ✅ Predictable brakes, strong lights | ✅ Strong bite, rugged stance |
| Practicality | ✅ Easier to store, commute | ❌ Bulkier for daily use |
| Comfort | ✅ Relaxed, smooth city ride | ✅ Great over rough stuff |
| Features | ✅ NFC, dual charge, LEDs | ❌ More basic gadgetry |
| Serviceability | ❌ Newer brand, fewer guides | ✅ Common parts, many guides |
| Customer Support | ❌ Mixed responsiveness | ✅ More established network |
| Fun Factor | ✅ Smooth, confidence-building | ✅ Punchy, more playful |
| Build Quality | ✅ Tight, minimal rattles | ❌ More squeaks, rattles |
| Component Quality | ✅ Drums, display, details | ❌ Decent, but cost-cut areas |
| Brand Name | ❌ Newer, less established | ✅ Better known in EU |
| Community | ❌ Smaller, still growing | ✅ Larger, active user base |
| Lights (visibility) | ✅ 360° presence, very bright | ✅ Good set, signals too |
| Lights (illumination) | ✅ Strong, focused beam | ✅ Good, functional beam |
| Acceleration | ❌ Smooth but modest pull | ✅ Stronger shove, hills |
| Arrive with smile factor | ✅ Calm, competent satisfaction | ✅ Extra grin from torque |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ✅ Very relaxing, predictable | ❌ More intense, grabby brakes |
| Charging speed | ✅ Dual ports, faster fill | ❌ Slower single charging |
| Reliability | ✅ Simple, low-fuss brakes | ❌ More to tweak, adjust |
| Folded practicality | ✅ Slimmer, easier to stash | ❌ Bulkier folded shape |
| Ease of transport | ✅ Easier up stairs | ❌ Awkward, more cumbersome |
| Handling | ✅ Nimble in tight city | ✅ Stable on rough tracks |
| Braking performance | ❌ Less outright bite | ✅ Strong, powerful stops |
| Riding position | ✅ Adjustable, relaxed stance | ✅ Adjustable, roomy deck |
| Handlebar quality | ✅ Feels refined, well-finished | ❌ Functional, less polished |
| Throttle response | ✅ Smooth, beginner-friendly | ❌ Can feel abrupt |
| Dashboard/Display | ✅ Bright circular colour LCD | ❌ OK, weaker in sunlight |
| Security (locking) | ✅ NFC lock integrated | ❌ No advanced lock tech |
| Weather protection | ✅ Enclosed drums, IP54 | ✅ Discs OK, IP54 |
| Resale value | ❌ New brand uncertainty | ✅ Easier resale recognition |
| Tuning potential | ❌ Less power headroom | ✅ More motor headroom |
| Ease of maintenance | ✅ Drums, fewer adjustments | ❌ Discs, more tinkering |
| Value for Money | ✅ Better all-round package | ❌ Good, but less efficient |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the AUSOM GX1 scores 8 points against the JOYOR S5's 2. In the Author's Category Battle, the AUSOM GX1 gets 30 ✅ versus 20 ✅ for JOYOR S5 (with a few ties sprinkled in).
Totals: AUSOM GX1 scores 38, JOYOR S5 scores 22.
Based on the scoring, the AUSOM GX1 is our overall winner. As a daily companion, the AUSOM GX1 simply feels like the more rounded, grown-up choice: it rides comfortably, sips energy sensibly, and folds into your life without making a fuss. The JOYOR S5 has its charms - the extra shove, the tougher stance, the sense that you can take the long way home over the rough bit "just because" - but you do feel its compromises more often. If I had to live with one of these as my only scooter for the next few years, carting it through real cities and real winters, I'd take the GX1 and not look back. The S5 is fun to visit; the GX1 is the one you actually move in with.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.

