Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
The AUSOM SR1 edges out as the more complete scooter overall: better suspension feel, stronger brakes, more usable range, and smarter, maintenance-friendly design make it the stronger daily companion if you actually ride a lot. The Solar P1 3.0 fights back with punchier-feeling acceleration off the line and a slightly higher load rating, so heavier riders who mainly crave brutal straight-line fun may still prefer it.
Pick the AUSOM SR1 if you want a fast "do-everything" scooter that feels thought through and civilised enough for daily use. Choose the Solar P1 3.0 if you prioritise raw shove and don't mind a more basic brake setup and less refinement. Now, let's dig into where each machine shines - and where the marketing gloss wears a bit thin.
There is a new class of scooter that happily sits between flimsy rental clones and five-grand death missiles, and both the Solar P1 3.0 and AUSOM SR1 live right there. I have spent long days commuting, climbing hills, and abusing both on broken city tarmac and light trails - enough time to learn what they are really like when the photoshoots are over and the bolts start to rattle.
On paper, they are twins: dual motors, chunky batteries, "SUV comfort" claims, very similar weight, and speeds that will quickly introduce you to your local traffic laws. In reality, their personalities are very different. The Solar feels like the loud mate who sprints everywhere; the AUSOM behaves more like the friend with a decent tool kit and a pension plan.
If you are wondering which one deserves your money - and which one is more likely to keep you smiling after the honeymoon and first puncture - keep reading.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
Both scooters land in that awkwardly tempting middle price tier: not cheap, but well below the "hyper-scooter" exotica. They target riders who have grown out of rental toys and vanilla commuters and now want real speed, real range, and proper suspension without selling a kidney.
The Solar P1 3.0 is marketed as an entry-level performance bruiser - big power, big load rating, and a very "function first" attitude. Think: ex-rental rider who has watched too many YouTube drag races.
The AUSOM SR1 is pitched as the all-rounder: still properly quick, but with more focus on comfort, range, and ease of living. It speaks to riders who actually commute every day and occasionally disappear into the woods on Sunday.
They cost close enough that most people will consider one against the other. Same voltage, similar peak speed, similar weight - so the real decision comes down to how you ride, how far, and how much compromise you are willing to live with.
Design & Build Quality
Pick each scooter up by the stem and you immediately feel they come from the same school of chunky aluminium overkill. Neither is dainty. But the detailing gives away different priorities.
The Solar P1 3.0 looks like military hardware: black, blocky, lots of exposed metal, and a cockpit that feels like someone tried to fit half an accessory shop onto one handlebar. It is rugged in a "this will probably survive being dropped down some stairs" way, but the finishing is more utilitarian than elegant. Edges, bolts, and clamps are all there to do a job, not to look pretty. The folding clamp is solid, but out of the box it tends to be stiff enough that you find yourself wondering if you skipped arm day.
The AUSOM SR1, by contrast, feels more like a finished product than a platform. The forged 6061 frame has cleaner lines; tolerances around the stem and swingarms feel tighter. The dark grey finish looks less "eBay special" and more like something you would not be embarrassed to park outside an office. You still get the industrial vibe, but with fewer rough edges. The non-folding bars are a double-edged sword: they add rigidity and help kill stem wobble, but they also mean the thing takes up more hallway.
What really sets the SR1 apart is the thoughtfulness: split rims for easier tyre work, a hidden AirTag mount, joystick indicators, NFC locking. On the Solar, you get a fingerprint or NFC start on some batches - nice - but it still feels like a traditional hot-rod scooter that has been modernised, rather than something designed from scratch around long-term ownership.
Ride Comfort & Handling
Both scooters promise "SUV comfort." Neither quite turns your city into a velvet runway, but one gets closer.
The Solar P1 3.0 uses hydraulic spring suspension front and rear with ten-inch pneumatic tyres. On typical city rubbish - expansion joints, cracked pavements, lazy workmanship - it actually does well. The initial hit is softened nicely, and small chatter is muted. Ride it for ten or fifteen kilometres over mixed surfaces and your knees will still be on speaking terms. Push it into faster sweepers and the long, heavy chassis feels planted, though the narrower tyres and less sophisticated geometry mean you occasionally get a bit of a hobby-horse effect on consecutive bumps.
The AUSOM SR1 ups the game with dual swingarms and hydraulic damping that feels more controlled. You notice it the first time you drop off a curb at speed: instead of bouncing and taking a second to settle like many dual-motor scoots, the SR1 just compresses, absorbs, and carries on. The fatter, all-terrain tyres give you a larger contact patch and take the sting out of sharper edges. After a long stint - twenty or thirty kilometres of broken asphalt and some gravel - I stepped off the SR1 noticeably less fatigued than off the Solar.
Handling-wise, the SR1's wider bars and better-controlled suspension give you more confidence when carving at higher speeds. The Solar is stable in a straight line and fine up to sensible commuting speeds, but push both equally hard into a bumpy corner and the AUSOM simply feels calmer, with less drama from the front end.
Performance
Let's be honest: nobody buys either of these because they enjoy going slowly.
The Solar P1 3.0's dual motors and sinewave controllers give it that addictive shove that makes your brain briefly question your life choices. In "Launch Mode," it pulls away from lights like it has something to prove. The power delivery is smoother than older square-wave monsters but still aggressive enough that new riders will absolutely do the classic "accidental full throttle and panic" move at least once. Up to city traffic pace it feels ferocious, and heavier riders in particular will appreciate how little it cares about weight when you pin it up a hill.
The AUSOM SR1 is slightly more civilised in how it deploys its dual motors, but do not confuse smoother with slower. In its higher modes it still hauls; the difference is that the surge feels more linear and easier to modulate. Where the Solar tends to egg you on to full beans all the time, the SR1 is happier cruising briskly, with enough in reserve that overtakes and hills feel almost casual. Real-world top speed between them is essentially a wash - both sit well into the "you really should be wearing serious gear now" zone - but the AUSOM feels less frantic once you are there.
Braking is where the gap widens. The Solar's mechanical discs have plenty of bite, arguably too much for beginners, but they do demand more hand strength and more upkeep. Long, fast descents will also show their limits sooner. The SR1's hydraulic Zoom brakes with E-ABS, on the other hand, let you haul the scooter down from silly speeds with one or two fingers. Modulation is better, lockups are rarer, and emergency stops are less "oh no" and more "that was fine". At the speeds these things can hit, that matters more than an extra fraction of a second to 40 km/h.
Battery & Range
On paper, the AUSOM has the bigger tank, and out on the road, that plays out as you would expect.
The Solar's battery is respectably sized for its class and, ridden with some restraint - single motor, moderate pace, minimal hooning - it will get many commuters through a typical day's return trip with a bit in hand. Start abusing Launch Mode, hammering both motors and attacking hills, and the gauge drops at a rate that feels perfectly normal for this performance level, but you quickly learn it is not a "several days between charges" machine if you ride it like you stole it.
The AUSOM's larger pack and slightly more efficient overall tuning mean that in similar mixed riding - some fun blasts, some cruising, some hills - you simply go further before the familiar battery anxiety sets in. Riders doing longer commutes or big weekend loops will appreciate finishing forty kilometres and still having a comfortable buffer left. The dual charge ports help too: with two chargers you can realistically go from nearly empty to full between lunch and evening plans, whereas the Solar feels much more like an overnight affair.
Both rely on voltage readings rather than optimistic bar graphs to give you a trustworthy sense of remaining juice. Get used to watching those numbers; it is far more accurate than pretending five battery bars mean anything when you just climbed a hill at full throttle.
Portability & Practicality
Here is the brutal truth: both scooters are heavy lumps of metal. If your daily routine includes stairs, a folding bike might be a better life choice.
The Solar P1 3.0 is a shade heavier on paper and feels every bit as awkward in real life. Carrying it up more than one flight of stairs is a short workout. The fold is sturdy, but the stem locks to the deck in a way that is more about keeping it in one piece in a car boot than making it compact. The wide bars and overall length scream "vehicle you park" rather than "gadget you tuck under your desk".
The AUSOM SR1 is only marginally lighter and not noticeably easier to deadlift. Its fold mechanism is quicker and more pleasant to operate day to day, and when folded the overall height is nicely low, so it slips into most hatchback boots without drama. But the fixed-width bars and long deck mean it still eats corridor space. Where the SR1 claws back some practicality is in the little quality-of-life features: walk mode that actually makes pushing the thing painless, Park mode that stops it shooting off if someone nudges the throttle, and those USB ports that quietly keep your phone alive on long rides.
In short: neither is realistically "portable". If you need to shoulder a scooter on and off trains and up platforms, look elsewhere. As urban vehicles that live in garages, lifts, or ground-floor flats, both work; the AUSOM just makes the non-riding bits slightly less annoying.
Safety
At the speeds these two can reach, safety is not optional, and thankfully neither feels like a death wish on wheels - but they take different routes to that reassurance.
The Solar P1 3.0 leans heavily on mass and tyres for stability. Once up to speed it feels planted, and the self-healing tyres add a bit of psychological comfort when you are hammering it over debris and potholes. The front headlight throws a genuinely useful beam, not just a token glimmer, and the deck indicators are better than nothing - though their low position means you still cannot rely on car drivers actually seeing them. The mechanical discs stop hard, but their "grabby" behaviour can catch out newer riders, and they require regular attention to stay sharp.
The AUSOM SR1 doubles down on active safety systems. The hydraulic brakes with E-ABS simply outclass the Solar's stoppers in both feel and repeatable performance. The wider, all-terrain tyres and sorted suspension give you more grip and stability under hard braking or when you hit a mid-corner bump at speed. Lighting is more comprehensive: bright headlight, conspicuous deck lighting, and that intuitive joystick for indicators that you can operate without looking down. Add in NFC locking and Park mode, and you are less likely to have surprise "scooter launched itself into a café wall" moments.
Both share the same basic limitation: IP ratings and electronics that will tolerate drizzle and wet streets but are not an invitation to go submarine. Sensible riders avoid heavy rain on either - not so much because they will instantly die, but because repairing water damage on this class of scooter is no one's idea of fun.
Community Feedback
| Solar P1 3.0 | AUSOM SR1 |
|---|---|
| What riders love Brutal acceleration and hill-climbing Plush-feeling suspension for the price Self-healing tyres reducing puncture drama Strong night-time headlight and deck lights Security extras (NFC/fingerprint on some units) Perceived "bang for buck" performance |
What riders love Explosive yet controllable acceleration Very comfortable suspension and fat tyres Hydraulic brakes with real stopping confidence Split rims and maintenance-friendly design NFC lock, AirTag mount, walk and park modes Big real-world range and "premium" ride feel |
| What riders complain about Heavy and awkward to carry Trigger-throttle finger fatigue on long rides Grabby brakes needing careful modulation Stiff, sometimes fiddly folding hardware Generic battery cells and post-delivery bolt checks Basic mechanical brakes at this speed level |
What riders complain about Still very heavy for stairs or trains Occasional brake squeal and setup fuss NFC cards/phone pairing niggles Non-folding bars awkward in tight spaces Rear fender a bit short in the wet Long charge time without buying a second charger |
Price & Value
Neither of these scooters is cheap. But both sit well below the silly-money tier, and both promise "hyper-scooter flavour" at mortal budgets. The Solar P1 3.0 comes in a bit cheaper and leans hard on its power-per-euro narrative. If you just want maximum shove and a decent battery for the least amount of cash, it makes a strong case - as long as you are fine with mechanical brakes, generic battery cells, and a bit of DIY tightening after unboxing.
The AUSOM SR1 costs a notch more, but you do see where the extra went: hydraulic brakes, larger battery, more sophisticated suspension, better thought-out details. For someone who rides daily and plans to keep the scooter for several seasons, the slightly higher buy-in starts to look like a sensible investment rather than upselling. If you only ride occasionally and mostly chase thrills, the price difference might feel harder to justify.
Service & Parts Availability
Solar has built a decent reputation in the UK-centric scene for actually picking up the phone and stocking spares. Controllers, tyres, stems, and even cosmetic parts can generally be sourced without combing obscure forums. The flip side is that quality control on delivery is... variable. The community almost treats "strip it and tighten everything" as part of the ownership ritual.
AUSOM is newer to European riders but has been surprisingly organised: documented warranties, relatively fast responses, and a focus on using recognisable components like Zoom brakes and standard tyre sizes. That means even if you cannot get a branded part tomorrow, your local shop has a fair chance of making something fit. Split rims also make at-home tyre and tube jobs far less hateful, which is indirectly a service win - you are less reliant on someone else's workshop.
Neither brand is at the level of a mainstream bicycle giant with dealers on every corner, but in the murky world of direct-to-consumer scooters, both are at least playing the long game rather than the "sell and vanish" trick. The AUSOM just feels a bit more future-proof in terms of component choices.
Pros & Cons Summary
| Solar P1 3.0 | AUSOM SR1 |
|---|---|
Pros
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
Cons
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | Solar P1 3.0 | AUSOM SR1 |
|---|---|---|
| Motor power (rated) | 2 x 1.200 W (2.400 W) | 2 x 1.000 W (2.000 W, 2.184 W peak) |
| Top speed (claimed / tested) | ca. 66,3 km/h | ca. 66 km/h |
| Battery capacity | 52 V 18 Ah (936 Wh) | 52 V 20,8 Ah (1.081,6 Wh) |
| Range (claimed) | ca. 48 km | ca. 87-95 km |
| Approx. real-world range (mixed riding) | ca. 25-35 km | ca. 50-60 km |
| Weight | 31,75 kg | 31,6 kg |
| Brakes | Mechanical discs + regen | Hydraulic discs (Zoom) + E-ABS |
| Suspension | Front & rear hydraulic spring | Dual swingarm with hydraulic damping |
| Tyres | 10" pneumatic, self-healing | 10" x 3" pneumatic all-terrain |
| Max load | 150 kg | 130 kg |
| Water resistance | IP54 | IP54 |
| Charging time | ca. 5-7 h | ca. 5-10 h (dual vs single) |
| Price (approx.) | ca. 1.195 € | ca. 1.251 € |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
Both scooters deliver proper performance, both will turn your commute into something you actually look forward to, and both come with the usual mid-range compromises. The key question is what kind of rider you are.
If your priority is sheer punch, you are a heavier rider, and you are counting every euro, the Solar P1 3.0 still makes sense. It gives you that addictive, grin-inducing launch, solid suspension for the money, and a chassis that shrugs off higher loads. Just go in with eyes open: you are trading away hydraulic brakes, some refinement, and a bit of range. Expect to get your hands dirty tightening things and living with a slightly more old-school feel.
If, however, you want a scooter that feels like a considered product rather than a fast toy - something you can ride long distances, stop safely in the wet, maintain without swearing at every tyre change, and rely on for proper daily use - the AUSOM SR1 is the stronger pick. The comfort, braking, range and maintenance wins make it easier to live with week after week, not just fun for a few fast runs after work.
Personally, after long days riding both, the SR1 is the one I would actually keep in my hallway. It is not perfect, but it gets more of the important things right, more of the time.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | Solar P1 3.0 | AUSOM SR1 |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ❌ 1,28 €/Wh | ✅ 1,16 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ✅ 18,02 €/km/h | ❌ 18,95 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ❌ 33,93 g/Wh | ✅ 29,21 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | ✅ 0,48 kg/km/h | ✅ 0,48 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ❌ 39,83 €/km | ✅ 22,75 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ❌ 1,06 kg/km | ✅ 0,57 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ❌ 31,2 Wh/km | ✅ 19,7 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ✅ 36,20 W/km/h | ❌ 30,30 W/km/h |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | ✅ 0,013 kg/W | ❌ 0,016 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ✅ 156 W | ❌ 144 W |
These metrics give a cold, numerical view of efficiency and value. Price per Wh and price per kilometre show how much you pay for stored and usable energy; weight-based metrics tell you how efficiently each scooter converts mass into range and speed. Wh per km highlights which scooter uses its battery more frugally in real riding, while power and weight ratios measure how much shove you get relative to weight and top speed. Charging speed is simply how quickly you can refill the tank - critical if you ride often.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | Solar P1 3.0 | AUSOM SR1 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ✅ Practically same as SR1 | ✅ Practically same as Solar |
| Range | ❌ Noticeably shorter real range | ✅ Goes much further per charge |
| Max Speed | ✅ Tiny edge, similar feel | ✅ Practically identical top pace |
| Power | ✅ Stronger rated motor output | ❌ Slightly less nominal power |
| Battery Size | ❌ Smaller pack, less buffer | ✅ Bigger battery, more range |
| Suspension | ❌ Good, but less controlled | ✅ More composed, more comfort |
| Design | ❌ Functional, a bit rough | ✅ Cleaner, more refined look |
| Safety | ❌ Mechanical brakes, basic aids | ✅ Hydraulics, E-ABS, better lights |
| Practicality | ❌ Fiddlier fold, fewer extras | ✅ Walk mode, park mode, USB |
| Comfort | ❌ Good, but more tiring | ✅ Softer, less fatigue overall |
| Features | ❌ Fewer smart touches | ✅ NFC, AirTag, split rims |
| Serviceability | ❌ Tyre work more painful | ✅ Split rims, standard parts |
| Customer Support | ✅ Solid, responsive reputation | ✅ Also responsive, engaged |
| Fun Factor | ✅ Launch mode hooligan vibes | ✅ Strong, but more civilised |
| Build Quality | ❌ Solid, but rougher finishing | ✅ Feels more premium, tight |
| Component Quality | ❌ Generic cells, mechanicals | ✅ Zoom brakes, thoughtful bits |
| Brand Name | ✅ Established in UK scene | ❌ Newer, still proving itself |
| Community | ✅ Larger, vocal owner base | ❌ Growing but smaller so far |
| Lights (visibility) | ✅ Strong presence with deck glow | ✅ Even more comprehensive setup |
| Lights (illumination) | ✅ Focused beam, good throw | ✅ Bright and wide coverage |
| Acceleration | ✅ More brutal off the line | ❌ Strong, but smoother hit |
| Arrive with smile factor | ✅ Hilarious launches, big grins | ✅ Fast yet comfy satisfaction |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ❌ More fatigue, more buzz | ✅ Calmer ride, less strain |
| Charging speed | ✅ Slightly quicker per Wh | ❌ Slower unless dual chargers |
| Reliability | ❌ More fettling, bolt checks | ✅ Feels more set-and-forget |
| Folded practicality | ❌ Bulky, stiff mechanism | ✅ Lower folded height, easier |
| Ease of transport | ❌ Awkward weight, same bulk | ❌ Also heavy and unwieldy |
| Handling | ❌ Fine, but less composed | ✅ More stable, better cornering |
| Braking performance | ❌ Mechanical, grabby under stress | ✅ Hydraulic, stronger and smoother |
| Riding position | ❌ OK, but less ergonomic | ✅ Wide deck, natural stance |
| Handlebar quality | ❌ Cluttered, more flex | ✅ Wide, solid, better layout |
| Throttle response | ✅ Wild, instant, exciting | ❌ Smoother, less dramatic hit |
| Dashboard/Display | ❌ Basic LCD, small readout | ✅ Large, informative display |
| Security (locking) | ✅ NFC/fingerprint on some units | ✅ NFC plus AirTag support |
| Weather protection | ✅ IP54, decent cable routing | ✅ IP54, similarly protected |
| Resale value | ✅ Known name, strong demand | ❌ Less proven on second-hand |
| Tuning potential | ✅ Popular, many mods available | ❌ Fewer mods yet on market |
| Ease of maintenance | ❌ Tyres and brakes more hassle | ✅ Split rims, standard parts |
| Value for Money | ❌ Cheap power, but compromises | ✅ More complete package overall |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the SOLAR P1 30 scores 5 points against the AUSOM SR1's 6. In the Author's Category Battle, the SOLAR P1 30 gets 17 ✅ versus 30 ✅ for AUSOM SR1 (with a few ties sprinkled in).
Totals: SOLAR P1 30 scores 22, AUSOM SR1 scores 36.
Based on the scoring, the AUSOM SR1 is our overall winner. Riding both back to back, the AUSOM SR1 simply feels more like a scooter you can actually live with: it rides softer, stops harder, goes further, and comes across as a better thought-out machine rather than just a fast one. The Solar P1 3.0 absolutely delivers on adrenaline and value on day one, but its rougher edges and compromises show sooner once the novelty of Launch Mode wears off. If I had to hand one set of bars back and keep the other, I would hold onto the SR1. It is the scooter that makes you look forward not just to the next sprint, but to the next thousand kilometres.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.

