City Tank vs Urban SUV: CITYBLITZ Beast vs EGRET X - Which "Heavyweight" Scooter Actually Deserves Your Money?

Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)

The Egret X Series is the more complete scooter here: it rides better, goes significantly further, feels more refined, and justifies its premium positioning far more convincingly than the Beast. It's the pick if you want a serious, daily vehicle that can chew through bad roads, longer commutes and bad weather without drama.

The CITYBLITZ Beast makes sense only if you're laser-focused on a road-legal, low-maintenance 20 km/h workhorse with puncture-proof tyres and you don't mind paying quite a lot for a fairly modest experience. Heavier riders in strictly regulated markets who value "no flats, no apps, just go" might still prefer it.

If you can stretch to the Egret, do it; if you absolutely need the Beast's specific mix of legality, no-flat tyres and lower upfront price, know exactly what you're trading away. Now let's dig into how they really compare when rubber meets cobblestones.

Both of these scooters are sold as "serious" urban vehicles, not toys: German brands, legal top speeds, big wheels, chunky frames, and marketing language full of words like "robust", "SUV", and "tank-like". On paper, they seem to chase the same rider: a commuter who's done with flimsy rentals and wants something dependable.

The CITYBLITZ Beast pitches itself as a heavy-duty, no-fuss commuter: solid tyres, beefy frame, strong payload, strict legal cap. It's for the rider who wants as little drama and maintenance as possible, and doesn't mind if the experience feels a bit, well, utility-focused.

The Egret X, by contrast, is the self-declared "SUV on two wheels": huge air-filled tyres, long range, strong torque and a much more polished feel. It's for people who actually ride a lot, not just from the tram stop to the office.

On the surface, they're both "big, German and serious". In practice, they live in different leagues. Let's unpack where the similarities end and the compromises begin.

Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?

Price-wise, both land in what most riders would call the grown-up bracket: not cheap toys, but not ultra-exotic hyper-scooters either. The Beast sits in the upper mid-range for 20 km/h commuters. The Egret X costs more, drifting into "I'm replacing a car or season ticket" territory.

Both are clearly aimed at adults: higher payloads, full lighting, proper braking, weather resistance, and enough weight that you won't see teenagers bunny-hopping them off kerbs. They both stay within legal speed caps, making them realistic options in countries where enforcement is more than theoretical.

So why compare them? Because if you're a European commuter with a decent budget and you want a rock-solid, legal scooter that feels like a real vehicle, these two are exactly what will pop up in your research. The tricky bit is that they promise similar virtues-safety, durability, "tank-like" feel-but achieve them in very different ways, with very different compromises attached.

Design & Build Quality

Pick them up-carefully-and the philosophy difference is obvious. The Beast looks and feels like a chunky, old-school work tool: thick frame tubes, lots of visible metal, a very "industrial" stance. It's functional, but also a bit dated. You can see where the money went-into mass and metal-yet there's not much in the way of finesse. Cables are reasonably tidy, welds are solid rather than pretty, and the overall vibe is "this will survive a fall down a stairwell, but don't expect it to win beauty contests".

The Egret X feels like someone cared about both function and form. The tubular frame is clean, with cables routed internally, paint that feels dense and robust, and components that look like they were chosen rather than grabbed from a generic parts bin. The deck covering is a washable rubber mat instead of rough grip tape, and the cockpit layout is mature: nothing flashy, just a well-organised console that doesn't squeak or rattle.

On build quality, both are on the "sturdy" side of the market, but the Egret manages to feel premium where the Beast just feels heavy. One is a well-engineered tool; the other feels a bit like overcompensation in metal form.

Ride Comfort & Handling

This is where the gap really opens up.

The Beast relies on a double front suspension and solid honeycomb tyres. On fresh asphalt, it feels fine-stable, planted, even reassuring. Start adding reality-cracks, expansion joints, cobbles-and you quickly remember you're on hard rubber. The front fork does a respectable job of taking the sting out of smaller hits, but the rear end is just a big, unsprung mass. Over a stretch of old cobblestones, your knees and ankles do more work than they should on a scooter at this price.

The Egret X, with its huge air-filled tyres and front suspension, plays in another league. Those oversized wheels roll over road scars that would have the Beast chattering. Tram tracks become a non-event, manhole lips turn from "brace!" moments into minor bumps. The rear is unsuspended too, but with that much air volume, it never feels as harsh as you'd expect. After several kilometres of broken pavement, on the Beast you're counting down traffic lights; on the Egret you're still looking for side streets to explore.

Handling-wise, both are very stable in a straight line thanks to their weight. The Beast has a slightly front-heavy feel because of the front hub motor and fork assembly; at low speed it can feel a bit "ploughy" in tight turns. The Egret's rear motor and bigger wheels give it a more balanced, motorcycle-like stance. It tracks beautifully and feels calm even when the surface is doing its best impression of a medieval road.

Performance

Neither of these is about raw top speed; they're both constrained by legal limits. The question is: how do they get to that speed, and what happens when the road points upward?

The Beast's party trick is torque from a comparatively modest motor system. For a legal-speed scooter, it pulls away from a standstill with decent authority, and on moderate hills it will keep you at or close to its capped speed, even if you're closer to the top of its payload rating. Acceleration is gentle and predictable-no surprises, no wheelspin, just a steady tug. It's perfectly adequate, but it never feels exciting. Competent rather than inspiring.

The Egret X-especially in Prime and Ultra flavour-adds another layer. The rear motor delivers much stronger torque, and you feel it the moment you hit a steeper climb. Where the Beast "manages", the Egret simply shrugs and goes. The acceleration is still civilised, not violent, but there's a satisfying push when you roll on the throttle, particularly with a heavier rider or luggage. You don't really think about whether it will get you up that hill; you just point and it goes.

Braking is also part of performance. The Beast uses a rear drum plus electronic front brake. The feel is soft but predictable, and in the wet the enclosed drum is reassuring. Still, modulation is nowhere near as precise as a good disc setup; you get a sort of "on/off plus assist" sensation that gets the job done but doesn't invite spirited riding.

The Egret's dual mechanical discs, with large rotors, have much more bite and, crucially, feel. You can feather them in traffic, or dig deep when a car door opens in front of you. Yes, at this price some will wish for hydraulics, but in the saddle they inspire a lot more confidence than the Beast's hybrid system.

Battery & Range

Range is one of the Beast's quiet compromises. On paper the battery size looks respectable; in practice, you land in the "solid but unspectacular" bracket. For a typical commuter distance it's fine-you can do a daily return trip across town without trembling at the battery bars-but if your route includes hills, higher rider weight, or regular headwinds, you're planning chargers sooner than you'd like for this price point.

The Egret X, especially in Ultra guise, plays a different sport. Real-world ranges that stretch over several days of commuting are entirely normal. Even the mid-tier Prime will comfortably cover long round trips that would have the Beast nervously blinking its last segment. Battery behaviour also stays more consistent; the Egret holds its performance deeper into the discharge, whereas the Beast starts to feel like it's working hard when you're running low.

Charging times reflect the different capacities: the Beast fills up comfortably overnight; the Egret Ultra basically wants a full night of sleep from empty, with the smaller X variants being more reasonable for daily top-ups. In other words, the Beast is OK if your riding life revolves around shorter, predictable loops. The Egret is for people who like to forget where their charger is for a few days.

Portability & Practicality

Both of these are in "you will not enjoy carrying me very far" territory.

The Beast is already on the heavy side for a single-motor commuter. The folding mechanism itself is quick and reasonably confidence-inspiring, and folded it'll slip under a desk or into a car boot without drama. The problem is simply mass, and the way it's distributed: with the motor and fork up front, carrying it in one hand while it's folded feels awkwardly nose-heavy. One flight of stairs is fine; three flights daily will have you seriously considering a gym membership or a different scooter.

The Egret X doubles down: even the lightest version is no feather, and the Ultra variant is solidly in "you'd better have an elevator" territory. The folding mechanism, however, is excellent-tight, rattle-free, and satisfying to operate. Once folded, it's compact enough lengthwise, but the massive wheels and fairly wide bars mean it's still a bulky lump to manoeuvre in tight corridors or train aisles.

For rolling practicality, both are easy: think door-to-door commutes from home to office, with a lift at each end. You park them in the hallway or garage, not over your shoulder. For multi-modal commuters who must carry their scooter often, neither is ideal-though between the two, the Egret's extra weight makes the Beast the "less bad" option for stairs, just not a particularly good one.

Safety

Safety is one of the Beast's stronger talking points, at least on paper. The combination of electronic front brake and rear drum works reliably in all weather, and the integrated lights are genuinely usable, not token candles. The bigger solid tyres give decent stability at its legal top speed, and the weight helps it feel planted rather than twitchy. IP55 protection gives a bit of reassurance when the sky turns grey.

The Egret, though, treats safety almost as a design language. The front light is properly bright, with a usable beam pattern that actually lets you see where you're going, not just decorate your front fork. The rear light and brake light are well placed, and on better trims you get integrated indicators at the bar ends-hugely underrated in dense traffic, where taking a hand off the bars to signal is not ideal.

Braking confidence clearly goes to the Egret: large discs, good levers, consistent feel. Tyre grip is stronger too, especially in the wet; those big pneumatic tyres bite into the tarmac rather than skimming over it. Add better water proofing and stronger frame security options, and the Egret simply makes you feel more like a real road user and less like a tolerated gadget pilot.

Community Feedback

Price & Value

Let's be blunt: the Beast asks a serious amount of money for a legal-speed single motor scooter with a middling battery and solid tyres. You do get robustness, a decent motor peak, front suspension, and the sweet relief of never fixing a flat. But the overall experience still feels like a nicely made "basic commuter" that somehow crept up into grown-up pricing territory. It's the kind of product where you constantly think, "This is fine... but for this price?"

The Egret X isn't cheap either-if anything, it's the poster child for premium micromobility pricing. But at least the experience matches the marketing more closely. The ride comfort, range, lighting, and general feeling of quality make it much easier to see where the money went. You're paying for long-term ownership, proper support, and a scooter that actually feels high-end under your feet, not just on the spec sheet.

Value-wise, the Egret still comes out ahead, even with its steeper ticket. The Beast's main value argument is "buy once, avoid flats, stay legal"; the Egret's is "buy once, actually enjoy riding for years". Between the two, I know where I'd rather see my bank statement groan.

Service & Parts Availability

Both brands are European and present, which already puts them ahead of anonymous imports.

CityBlitz has decent distribution through retailers, particularly in the DACH region. That means getting a charger, a brake lever or a basic service is usually manageable. The design is relatively simple, which is a plus for straightforward repairs, but the more niche elements-specific drum parts or proprietary plastics-can occasionally require some patience.

Egret (Walberg Urban Electrics) has built a reputation on doing aftersales right. Parts availability is generally good, documentation is clearer, and there's a more mature network of dealers and service partners familiar with the machines. For a long-term commuter putting serious kilometres on a scooter, this matters. If something does go wrong, the Egret ownership experience tends to feel more like dealing with an established vehicle manufacturer than with a gadget brand.

Pros & Cons Summary

Parameters Comparison

Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?

If you strip away marketing slogans, the Beast is, fundamentally, a heavy, solid, legal 20 km/h scooter with strong torque, puncture-proof tyres and minimal frills. For a heavy rider in a country with strict rules, who rides modest daily distances on mostly decent surfaces and absolutely never wants to see a puncture repair kit again, it does its job. You step on, you go, you don't fiddle with apps, and you probably won't break it easily.

The Egret X, meanwhile, feels like a complete vehicle rather than a rugged appliance. It rides more comfortably, stops more confidently, shrugs off worse weather, and covers distances that make car keys feel less necessary. You absolutely pay for that privilege, and you'll curse it if you must haul it up a stairwell-but on the road, it rewards every euro with a calmer, safer, more enjoyable ride.

If your budget and storage situation can stretch to the Egret X, it's the scooter that will genuinely upgrade your daily life rather than just replace your bus ticket. The Beast only really makes sense if you're locked to its specific combination of legality, no-flat tyres and slightly lower price-and you're willing to live with a stiffer ride and more modest capability to get it.

Numbers Freaks Corner

These metrics look purely at maths: how much you pay per unit of battery or speed, how efficiently each scooter turns battery into kilometres, and how much performance you get for the weight you're lugging around. Lower numbers are better for cost and efficiency metrics, while higher numbers win where more power or faster charging is desirable. They don't capture ride feel-but they do reveal that, beyond initial sticker price, the Egret X makes more efficient use of its weight, power and battery.

Author's Category Battle

Overall Winner Declaration

In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the CITYBLITZ Beast (CB076SZ) scores 1 point against the EGRET X SERIES's 9. In the Author's Category Battle, the CITYBLITZ Beast (CB076SZ) gets 8 ✅ versus 31 ✅ for EGRET X SERIES.

Totals: CITYBLITZ Beast (CB076SZ) scores 9, EGRET X SERIES scores 40.

Based on the scoring, the EGRET X SERIES is our overall winner. Riding both back to back, the Egret X simply feels like the more complete companion: calmer over bad roads, more reassuring at night, and far more capable when you decide to take the long way home. It feels like a machine you'll grow into, not one you'll grow out of. The Beast does have its charms as a no-nonsense, low-maintenance work mule, but next to the Egret it's hard to shake the sense that you're paying grown-up money for a very sensible, slightly joyless tool. If you want your daily ride to feel like a small luxury rather than just another appliance, the Egret is the one that will keep you looking forward to the next trip.

That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.