EGRET X SERIES vs EPOWERFUN ePF-2 PRO - Two "Serious" German Scooters, But Which One Deserves Your Commute?

EGRET X SERIES
EGRET

X SERIES

1 297 € View full specs →
VS
EPOWERFUN ePF-2 PRO 🏆 Winner
EPOWERFUN

ePF-2 PRO

864 € View full specs →
Parameter EGRET X SERIES EPOWERFUN ePF-2 PRO
Price 1 297 € 864 €
🏎 Top Speed 20 km/h 20 km/h
🔋 Range 55 km 60 km
Weight 21.0 kg 22.2 kg
Power 1350 W 1200 W
🔌 Voltage 48 V 48 V
🔋 Battery 499 Wh 490 Wh
Wheel Size 12.5 " 10 "
👤 Max Load 120 kg 120 kg
Speed Comparison

Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)

The EPOWERFUN ePF-2 PRO edges out as the more compelling all-rounder: it rides softer thanks to proper front-and-rear suspension, climbs hills with more enthusiasm, and undercuts the Egret X Series clearly on price while still feeling like a grown-up, daily-use machine. If you want maximum comfort per euro and don't care about fashion points, this is the safer bet.

The EGRET X Series still makes sense if you prize huge wheels, rock-solid frame feel and integrated security above all else, or you just love its "SUV on two wheels" vibe and are willing to pay a premium for that particular flavour of overbuilt stability. Heavy riders on terrible cobblestones may also appreciate its tank-like calm at speed.

Both are serious, street-legal commuters; the ePF-2 PRO simply gives you more real-world ability for less money, while the Egret asks you to love its design and brand enough to justify the extra spend.

Read on if you want the full, road-tested story - including comfort, quirks, hidden costs and which one your future self is more likely to thank you for.

Modern European e-scooters have grown up. Long gone are the rattly toys that folded themselves in half when they met a tram track. The EGRET X Series and the EPOWERFUN ePF-2 PRO are both very much from this new generation: serious, German-designed machines that want to replace your bus pass, not your Sunday skateboard.

I've spent time with both in the kind of conditions marketing departments pretend don't exist: soaked bike lanes, angry cobblestones, pointless short hills that somehow always appear at the end of a long day. On paper they look like direct rivals: legal top speeds, similar motor ratings, stout frames, big batteries. On the road, they approach the same problem - "how do I move a full-grown human through a hostile city without drama?" - in very different ways.

Think of the EGRET X as a tall, overbuilt city SUV that refuses to acknowledge potholes, and the ePF-2 PRO as a slightly nerdy but very capable crossover with a surprisingly lively motor and clever suspension. Both will get you there. The interesting question is: which one will you actually want to live with every day?

Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?

EGRET X SERIESEPOWERFUN ePF-2 PRO

Both scooters sit in that "serious money, but not insane" bracket. You're firmly out of supermarket territory and into the land of branded batteries, proper controllers and frames that don't panic when a 100 kg rider meets a 12 % hill.

The EGRET X Series targets riders who want an SUV-style feel: huge balloon tyres, ultra-stable chassis, strong focus on safety and water resistance, and a brand story built around regulation and reliability. It's pitched as an adult's vehicle first, gadget second.

The EPOWERFUN ePF-2 PRO aims at exactly the same commuter, but with a more engineering-led twist: full suspension, a very refined motor controller, and aggressive hill-climbing - all at a noticeably friendlier price point. It tries to be the "goldilocks" scooter: powerful enough, comfy enough, legal everywhere, and still vaguely liftable.

They compete because if you're a European commuter with a medium to long daily ride, a legal-speed requirement and a budget that can stretch into four figures, these two will inevitably appear on your shortlist. One asks you to pay more for big wheels and brand polish; the other sells you more tech and performance per euro.

Design & Build Quality

Specs Comparison

Pick up the EGRET X (or rather, attempt to) and you immediately feel the "SUV" brief. The tubular frame looks and feels like it came from a roll-cage supplier, with very tidy welds and almost no visible cabling. The deck is broad and covered in a removable rubber mat that shrugs off dirt. Nothing creaks, nothing rattles, and the stem lock has the reassuring thunk of a car door when you close it properly.

The ePF-2 PRO is less dramatic to look at. It's anonymous matte black industrial design rather than "Instagram me now". The welding is solid, and the frame doesn't flex, but it doesn't scream luxury. Cables are managed neatly but not hidden as obsessively as on the Egret. Where it redeems itself is in the details: a large, legible display, proper switchgear, and a folding mechanism that favours robustness over clever origami tricks.

In the hands, the Egret feels slightly more premium as an object: the paint is thicker, the cables are invisible, the metal fenders and integrated rear-light/fender combo feel over-engineered in a good way. The ePF-2 PRO feels more like a well-made tool than a statement piece - competent, tight, but a bit plain. If you care deeply about aesthetic polish and invisible cable routing, Egret has the edge. If you care more about what happens when the road tilts upwards, the story changes later.

Ride Comfort & Handling

This is where their philosophies really split. Egret goes for giant 12,5-inch tyres plus a front fork, no rear suspension. EPOWERFUN goes with more typical 10-inch tyres but adds both front and rear suspension.

On rough city surfaces, the Egret X's monster tyres soak up a surprising amount before the fork even gets involved. On long stretches of cobbles, it has this lazy, steamroller calm: the front just rolls over edges that would make smaller wheels flinch, and the long wheelbase keeps things arrow-stable. The downside is at the back. Without a rear shock, sharp hits still arrive in your knees and lower back. Not brutally, but after a longer ride you know you've been standing.

The ePF-2 PRO, with its dual suspension, spreads the work more evenly. The front fork filters the worst of the curb drops, while the adjustable rear spring actually earns its keep when you hit repetitive bumps or broken pavement. You feel a bit more of the road texture than on the Egret's balloon tyres, but the impact is muted at both ends. After a longer commute, my legs were less tired on the ePF-2 PRO, especially on routes with repeated small hits rather than giant potholes.

Handling-wise, the Egret feels like a large, calm bicycle. Wide bars, long wheelbase, big wheels - it likes smooth arcs and steady steering inputs. At legal speeds it's rock solid, almost to the point of being a bit dull if you like quick directional changes. The ePF-2 PRO is slightly more agile. With smaller wheels and a bit shorter stance, it's happier to weave through tight bike-lane traffic. It's still very stable at its speed cap, but the front feels a touch more alive in your hands.

If your city is all medieval cobblestones and tram tracks, the Egret's big wheels are a real asset. If your roads are "just" rough and patchy and you value all-day comfort, the ePF-2 PRO's full suspension wins the endurance test.

Performance

Both scooters are legally strangled on top speed, so the real question is: how quickly do they get there, and can they keep it on hills?

The EGRET X Series - especially the Prime and Ultra variants - has impressive torque on paper, and on the road it pulls like a quiet diesel. The ramp-up is smooth rather than explosive; you get a strong, predictable shove from a standstill, but it doesn't try to snap your wrists. On moderate climbs, it just keeps chugging along. On steeper hills, it still does the job better than typical 350 W commuters, but you feel the weight and those big tyres to some extent.

The ePF-2 PRO feels friskier. The Hobbywing controller gives it very immediate, very controlled response to the throttle: you press, it goes - no lazy dead zone, no surprise lurch. The peak power is higher, and the 48 V system makes itself known on climbs. On the same nasty inclines where the Egret settles into a resigned plod, the ePF-2 PRO simply keeps charging, happily holding its limited top speed with a heavier rider on board.

Braking behaviour also differs. Egret uses large mechanical discs front and rear. Lever feel is decent, power is good, and the big rotors cope well with heat, but you do need a little more finger force than on hydraulics. They're predictable and confidence-inspiring, just not exciting. The ePF-2 PRO mixes a front drum with a very effective rear motor brake. You can ride 90 % of the time on the electronic brake alone, smoothly bleeding off speed with a thumb lever while quietly pushing a bit of energy back into the battery. The drum doesn't have the razor-sharp bite of a good disc, but as a low-maintenance commuter solution, the combo works extremely well.

In terms of sheer "how alive does it feel at legal speeds", the ePF-2 PRO wins. The Egret feels more grown-up and measured; the EPOWERFUN feels like it secretly resents the speed limit and expresses that with every launch from a traffic light.

Battery & Range

Both scooters offer variants with big batteries and optimistic brochure ranges. More interesting is what happens when you stop babying them.

The EGRET X Ultra, with the largest pack, will comfortably get a medium-weight rider through a long commuting week on a single charge if you're not hammering full throttle into headwinds every day. Even the mid-tier Prime gives enough real-world distance that most people will only charge two or three times a week. The Core is more of a classic daily commuter: solid range, but not a touring monster. The energy consumption is helped by those large wheels coasting efficiently once up to speed.

The ePF-2 PRO, with its biggest battery option, plays in the same real-world ballpark: commuting there-and-back plus detours without constantly glancing at the remaining percentage. The built-in battery percentage readout is a huge psychological advantage over Egret's more basic bar-style indication; you actually know how much you have left, instead of guessing if the second bar means "relax" or "start praying". On smaller battery versions, range naturally shrinks, but efficiency remains good thanks to the smooth controller and recuperation.

Charging is another angle. Egret's smallest packs refill in roughly a working afternoon; the big Ultra takes you solidly into overnight territory. The ePF-2 PRO's larger pack charges in roughly one evening as well, but the overall experience is helped by the option of removable batteries on certain models - you can take just the pack upstairs instead of hauling the entire scooter. If you live in an upper-floor flat, that matters.

Both are strong in range for their class; neither is a hyper-scooter. But the ePF-2 PRO walks away with the practicality trophy here thanks to the clearer battery information, regenerative braking and optional swappable packs.

Portability & Practicality

Let's be clear: neither of these is a featherweight last-mile toy. If your daily routine involves three flights of stairs and a folding bike rack on a packed train, you're shopping in the wrong aisle.

The EGRET X is big in every sense. Those massive tyres and wide handlebars make it bulky even when folded. The folding mechanism itself is beautifully solid and rattle-free, but you're still wrestling a heavy, long scooter. Carrying it for a few seconds is fine; dragging it through a station for ten minutes will have you reconsidering your life choices.

The ePF-2 PRO is only slightly lighter on the scales but feels a touch more manageable due to the more conventional wheel size and slightly slimmer footprint. The non-folding handlebars mean it still eats a lot of space width-wise, though. The dual-locking stem mechanism is easy enough to use and secure, and once folded, lifting it into a car boot is doable if you're reasonably fit. You won't love it, but you won't need a chiropractor either.

Where Egret claws some points back is in weather and parking practicality. The water protection on both frame and battery is excellent, and the integrated frame lock concept, plus support for proper locking solutions, makes it easier to leave the scooter outside a café without constant anxiety. The ePF-2 PRO is also decently weather-proof and happy in rain, but its security is more "bring your own lock and creativity".

In daily use, both behave like small vehicles rather than portable gadgets. If you have ground-floor or garage storage, you're fine. If you must lift and carry regularly, the ePF-2 PRO is the slightly lesser evil, but that's faint praise.

Safety

These two take safety unusually seriously - a refreshing change from the "we stuck a torch on the front, good luck" school of design.

The EGRET X's front light is genuinely usable, not just decorative. It throws a decent beam ahead, and the rear light with brake function and optional bar-end indicators (on higher trims) does a proper job of letting traffic know what you're up to. The huge tyres and long chassis give loads of straight-line stability; you rarely feel sketchy, even on wet surfaces. The disc brakes offer consistent stopping, and the overall frame stiffness means no wobbly drama in emergency manoeuvres.

The ePF-2 PRO ups the lighting game again, with an even brighter front beam and integrated turn signals at both ends. The fact you never have to take a hand off the bars to indicate is a real-world safety benefit, not a gimmick. The tubeless, gel-filled tyres dramatically reduce the chance of sudden flats - a safety issue most people only appreciate the first time a cheap scooter dumps them because of a puncture mid-corner. The geometry is dialled for stability, and the electronic brake lets you scrub speed progressively without unsettling the chassis.

Grip-wise, both sets of tyres inspire confidence in dry and wet conditions, but the Egret's bigger contact patch and diameter make rough surfaces feel less threatening. The ePF-2 PRO counters with its suspension keeping the tyres planted more of the time. Braking confidence is slightly higher on Egret if you like a classic two-lever, two-wheel mechanical system; the EPOWERFUN wins if you appreciate the finesse of a powerful regen brake you can modulate with a thumb.

Overall, both are genuinely safe designs when ridden sensibly, but the ePF-2 PRO edges ahead through lighting, regen braking and puncture resistance, while Egret scores with mass, stability and integrated locking.

Community Feedback

EGRET X SERIES EPOWERFUN ePF-2 PRO
What riders love
  • Ultra-stable big-wheel ride
  • "Tank-like" build and finish
  • Excellent water resistance
  • Strong hill torque on Prime/Ultra
  • Bright, usable lighting
  • Integrated lock concept and security
  • Metal fenders that actually work
  • Clean design with hidden cables
What riders love
  • Brutal hill-climbing for a legal scooter
  • Very smooth, precise throttle and braking
  • Full suspension comfort on bad roads
  • Realistic, strong real-world range
  • Extremely bright light and turn signals
  • Helpful, responsive German support
  • App tuning for throttle/brake feel
  • Puncture-resistant tubeless tyres
What riders complain about
  • Very heavy to carry
  • Expensive for the spec sheet
  • Bulky when folded
  • No hydraulic brakes at this price
  • Lack of rear suspension
  • Strictly limited top speed
  • Occasional kickstand rattle
  • Occasional app/Bluetooth quirks
What riders complain about
  • Also heavy and not very compact
  • Long charging time on big batteries
  • Drum brake feel not as sharp as discs
  • Indicator sound can be annoying
  • Understated, "boring" design
  • Wide folded footprint (non-folding bars)
  • Occasional kickstand annoyance
  • Still pricey vs entry-level toys

Price & Value

This is where the polite discussion turns slightly awkward for Egret. The X Series asks for a clear premium. You get big wheels, a nicely finished frame, strong water protection and good support - all commendable - but if you look at motor punch, suspension and battery size versus price, the math is not exactly in its favour.

The ePF-2 PRO, meanwhile, sits comfortably cheaper while offering more advanced suspension, a very capable controller, excellent lighting and, in its larger-battery trims, comparable or better real-world range. You're paying for components and engineering rather than brand aura and overspecified tyres. As a daily commuter purchase, the "cost per comfortable kilometre" argument is firmly on EPOWERFUN's side.

If you adore the Egret's design and are allergic to visible cables, you can still justify its premium. But if you're simply hunting for the best ride and range for your money, the ePF-2 PRO is hard to argue against.

Service & Parts Availability

To their credit, both brands take aftersales support seriously - a refreshing difference from the sea of white-label imports.

Egret has been around for years, with a solid European footprint, good parts availability and proper documentation. You can get spares, warranty service is relatively painless, and the brand has a reputation to protect, which usually translates to decent treatment when things go wrong.

EPOWERFUN plays in the same league but with a slightly more "community-facing" vibe. The founder pops up in forums, firmware feedback is actually listened to, and the parts warehouse in Germany is well-stocked. Almost every small component can be ordered, which makes long-term ownership less of a gamble. They are particularly strong at shipping small parts quickly and talking owners through fixes.

In practice, both are safe choices if you care about long-term serviceability. The ePF-2 PRO has a slight edge in transparency and enthusiast-minded support; Egret has the more entrenched "premium" ecosystem.

Pros & Cons Summary

EGRET X SERIES EPOWERFUN ePF-2 PRO
Pros
  • Huge tyres give superb stability
  • Very solid, premium-feeling frame
  • Excellent water protection and fenders
  • Good torque for legal scooter, especially Prime/Ultra
  • Bright, practical lighting and optional indicators
  • Integrated lock and security features
  • Clean design with fully hidden cables
Pros
  • Strong, eager acceleration and hill-climbing
  • Full suspension for better long-ride comfort
  • Excellent, bright lighting with turn signals
  • Realistic, long range with big battery
  • Regenerative braking with great modulation
  • Very good app and tuning options
  • Great value for the performance and components
Cons
  • Very heavy and bulky to move
  • Pricey compared with similarly capable rivals
  • No rear suspension; comfort has limits
  • Mechanical brakes only at a premium price
  • Strict top-speed cap, even off public roads
  • Folded footprint awkward for tight spaces
Cons
  • Also heavy; not ideal for stairs
  • Charging the largest battery is slow
  • Front drum brake lacks crisp feel
  • Handlebars don't fold, takes up space
  • Design is quite plain and utilitarian

Parameters Comparison

Parameter EGRET X SERIES (typical Prime/Ultra) EPOWERFUN ePF-2 PRO (largest battery)
Motor rated power 500 W rear hub 500 W rear hub
Peak power 1.350 W (Prime/Ultra) 1.200 W
Top speed (legal) 20-25 km/h (market-dependent) ≈ 22 km/h (within tolerance)
Battery capacity 649-865 Wh (Prime/Ultra) 835 Wh
Claimed range 65-90 km 60-100 km
Realistic mixed-use range Prime: ~45-50 km, Ultra: ~65-75 km ~65-75 km (largest battery)
Weight ≈ 24-26 kg (Prime/Ultra) ≈ 23,8 kg
Brakes Front & rear mechanical discs (160 mm) Front drum, rear electronic motor brake
Suspension Front fork only Front fork + rear swingarm
Tyres 12,5-inch pneumatic 10-inch tubeless pneumatic with gel
Max rider load 120-130 kg 120 kg
IP rating IPX5 scooter / IPX7 battery IP65
Typical street price ≈ 1.297 € (X range average) ≈ 864 € (largest battery)

 

Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?

If both scooters were the same price, this would be a very tight call. But they aren't, and that matters. The EPOWERFUN ePF-2 PRO delivers more comfort via full suspension, more engaging performance at legal speeds, excellent safety features, and strong range, all while costing significantly less. As a practical, day-in, day-out commuter, it simply makes more sense for more people.

The EGRET X Series has its own charm. Those huge tyres give a unique, reassuring ride feel, the frame and fenders are beautifully executed, and the integrated security and water protection make it a very worry-free machine to leave outside in bad weather. If you're particularly obsessed with big-wheel stability, love the look, and don't mind paying a premium for it, you won't be disappointed - you'll just be paying extra for qualities that are more emotional than rational.

For the average European commuter who wants to get from A to B quickly, comfortably and without overpaying for design drama, the ePF-2 PRO is the smarter, more rounded choice. The Egret X remains a solid scooter, but in this head-to-head, it feels a bit like you're paying luxury money for what is, underneath, a very competent but not exceptional package.

Numbers Freaks Corner

Metric EGRET X SERIES EPOWERFUN ePF-2 PRO
Price per Wh (€/Wh) ❌ 1,50 €/Wh ✅ 1,03 €/Wh
Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) ❌ 64,85 €/km/h ✅ 39,27 €/km/h
Weight per Wh (g/Wh) ❌ 30,06 g/Wh ✅ 28,50 g/Wh
Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) ❌ 1,30 kg/km/h ✅ 1,08 kg/km/h
Price per km of real-world range (€/km) ❌ 18,53 €/km ✅ 12,34 €/km
Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) ❌ 0,37 kg/km ✅ 0,34 kg/km
Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) ❌ 12,36 Wh/km ✅ 11,93 Wh/km
Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) ✅ 67,50 W/km/h ❌ 54,55 W/km/h
Weight to power ratio (kg/W) ✅ 0,0193 kg/W ❌ 0,0198 kg/W
Average charging speed (W) ❌ 96,11 W ✅ 139,17 W

These metrics look purely at how efficiently each scooter turns money, weight, energy and time into performance and range. Lower cost per Wh or per kilometre means better value; lower weight per Wh or per kilometre suggests a more energy-dense, portable package. Wh per km captures real-world energy efficiency, while power-to-speed and weight-to-power ratios show how much performance you get relative to size. Finally, average charging speed tells you how quickly a flat battery becomes a usable vehicle again.

Author's Category Battle

Category EGRET X SERIES EPOWERFUN ePF-2 PRO
Weight ❌ Heavier, bulkier feel ✅ Slightly lighter, less bulky
Range ✅ Ultra version goes far ❌ Similar but not further
Max Speed ❌ Feels more strictly capped ✅ Optimised tolerance top end
Power ✅ Strong peak torque ❌ Slightly less peak grunt
Battery Size ✅ Bigger pack on Ultra ❌ Slightly smaller maximum
Suspension ❌ Only front suspension ✅ Full front and rear
Design ✅ Cleaner, more premium look ❌ Functional, quite plain
Safety ❌ Very good but simpler ✅ Lights, blinkers, regen
Practicality ❌ Bulkier, worse indoors ✅ Easier to live with
Comfort ❌ Rear can feel harsh ✅ Suspension better long rides
Features ❌ Less configurable electronics ✅ App, tuning, regen, blinkers
Serviceability ✅ Good parts and manuals ✅ Also excellent parts access
Customer Support ✅ Solid, established brand ✅ Very responsive, community-led
Fun Factor ❌ Calm but a bit dull ✅ Punchy, playful within law
Build Quality ✅ Tank-like frame feel ❌ Strong but less refined
Component Quality ✅ Branded, solid components ✅ Hobbywing, good battery, etc.
Brand Name ✅ More "premium" perception ❌ Smaller, more niche
Community ✅ Respectable, long-standing base ✅ Very active, engaged users
Lights (visibility) ❌ Bright but less advanced ✅ Strong beam, clear blinkers
Lights (illumination) ❌ Good, but weaker ✅ Very bright headlight
Acceleration ❌ Smooth but less eager ✅ Snappier, more responsive
Arrive with smile factor ❌ Competent, not thrilling ✅ Lively, satisfying shove
Arrive relaxed factor ✅ Big wheels, super stable ❌ Slightly more busy feel
Charging speed ❌ Slower on largest pack ✅ Faster refill overall
Reliability ✅ Proven, robust construction ✅ Strong track record too
Folded practicality ❌ Very bulky big wheels ✅ Slightly trimmer footprint
Ease of transport ❌ Heavier, awkward to carry ✅ Marginally easier, still heavy
Handling ✅ Ultra-stable, big-wheel calm ❌ More agile but less planted
Braking performance ✅ Strong mechanical discs ❌ Drum lacks ultimate bite
Riding position ✅ Wide, commanding stance ❌ Slightly less room
Handlebar quality ✅ Wide, ergonomic grips ❌ Functional, less premium
Throttle response ❌ Smooth but less precise ✅ Very refined Hobbywing feel
Dashboard/Display ❌ Basic but clear ✅ Large, bright, percentage
Security (locking) ✅ Integrated lock-friendly frame ❌ Standard, needs own solution
Weather protection ✅ Excellent IPX and fenders ✅ Very good IP65 rating
Resale value ✅ Stronger brand desirability ❌ Less recognised second-hand
Tuning potential ❌ Locked-down, legality focused ✅ More controller flexibility
Ease of maintenance ❌ Larger, more awkward tyres ✅ Tubeless, parts easy to swap
Value for Money ❌ Expensive for what you get ✅ Strong performance per euro

Overall Winner Declaration

Winner

In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the EGRET X SERIES scores 2 points against the EPOWERFUN ePF-2 PRO's 8. In the Author's Category Battle, the EGRET X SERIES gets 19 ✅ versus 26 ✅ for EPOWERFUN ePF-2 PRO (with a few ties sprinkled in).

Totals: EGRET X SERIES scores 21, EPOWERFUN ePF-2 PRO scores 34.

Based on the scoring, the EPOWERFUN ePF-2 PRO is our overall winner. Between these two, the ePF-2 PRO simply feels like the scooter that "gets it" for everyday riders: it's nicer to live with, more playful, and asks less from your bank account while still feeling grown-up and solid. The Egret X has a certain quiet gravitas and big-wheel charm, but it never quite justifies the extra outlay once you've ridden both back-to-back in real traffic. If you want an overbuilt SUV on two wheels, the Egret will happily indulge you. If you want a capable, comfortable partner for the daily grind that still manages to make you grin on a wet Tuesday morning, the ePF-2 PRO is the one that feels like a smarter, more satisfying choice.

That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.