ELJET Dino vs SIMATE S3 - Which Kids' E-Scooter Actually Deserves Your Money?

ELJET Dino
ELJET

Dino

111 € View full specs →
VS
SIMATE S3 🏆 Winner
SIMATE

S3

153 € View full specs →
Parameter ELJET Dino SIMATE S3
Price 111 € 153 €
🏎 Top Speed 13 km/h 14 km/h
🔋 Range 11 km 8 km
Weight 9.0 kg 8.2 kg
Power 300 W 260 W
🔌 Voltage 24 V 24 V
🔋 Battery 96 Wh 60 Wh
Wheel Size 5.5 " 6.5 "
👤 Max Load 65 kg 70 kg
Speed Comparison

Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)

The SIMATE S3 edges out the ELJET Dino overall thanks to its better brakes, more modern tech (brushless motor, display, kick-to-start), and slightly more "grown-up" feel that kids adore. The Dino fights back hard on price and battery capacity, making it the thriftier choice for flat neighbourhoods and younger, lighter riders. If safety features, looks and a more refined ride matter most, the S3 is the smarter pick; if you just want maximum playtime per euro and don't care about fancy electronics, the Dino still makes sense. Both are clearly kids' machines with compromises, so neither is perfect-but one wastes your money less.

Keep reading if you want the full, road-tested breakdown before you let either of these move into your hallway.

Kids' electric scooters have quietly become the new "must-have" gadget, and ELJET Dino and SIMATE S3 sit right in that tempting space where parents think, "This seems reasonable" and kids think, "This is basically a motorbike." I've put decent kilometres on both, from park paths to cracked suburban pavements, chasing small test riders and occasionally jogging to keep up when they "forget" the agreed boundary.

The ELJET Dino feels very much like a powered toy that's been thoughtfully upgraded to survive real-world abuse. The SIMATE S3, in contrast, wants to be a shrunk-down adult scooter with lights and a display to prove it. In one sentence: Dino is for parents who love spreadsheets; S3 is for kids who love style. Neither is flawless, and both cut corners in different places-but that's exactly why this comparison matters.

If you're trying to decide which one deserves to live in your boot, your hallway and your family WhatsApp photos, let's dig in.

Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?

ELJET DinoSIMATE S3

Both scooters target roughly the same age bracket: early school years up to pre-teens, for paved, low-speed adventures. Think school runs on the pavement, loops around the park and endless back-and-forth in cul-de-sacs-not serious commuting, and certainly not off-road heroics.

The Dino is clearly tuned for younger, smaller riders. It fits shorter heights better, feels simpler, and its single-speed, no-display, "just ride" personality screams "first electric toy". Its pitch is: minimal wallet damage, maximum run time, no-fuss ownership.

The SIMATE S3 stretches higher-literally and figuratively. Taller kids fit more comfortably, and the styling, display and deck lights give it that "real scooter like mum and dad's" vibe. SIMATE is selling not just movement, but status: the scooter that looks proper on Instagram.

They're competitors because a parent comparing kids' scooters in a mid-budget range will see both on the same page: similar speed, similar motor class, similar weight. Underneath, though, they're very different approaches to solving the same problem: how to electrify childhood without scaring either rider or parent.

Design & Build Quality

Specs Comparison

Pick them up and the difference is immediate. The Dino is built on a steel frame, giving it a slightly old-school, blunt-instrument feel. It's sturdy enough for kid abuse, but you can tell weight saving wasn't the main design brief. Welds are functional rather than pretty, the folding joint is simple, and the whole thing feels more like a well-made toy than a refined vehicle.

The SIMATE S3's aluminium frame, by contrast, feels closer to an entry-level adult scooter. The finish is cleaner, the shapes are more geometric, and the folding joint locks with more confidence. Paint quality and detailing are a step up; after a few weeks of careless parking and gentle crashes, the S3 still looks intentionally designed, while the Dino starts to show its bargain-roots more quickly.

Ergonomically, Dino's telescopic handlebar is a big practical win for growing kids, but the cockpit itself is barebones: throttle, brake, that's it. It works, but it never feels particularly special. The S3 counters with a fixed-height bar, which is less flexible for growth but feels structurally more solid. The integrated LED display in the middle of the bar gives the SIMATE a "proper scooter" aura the Dino can't match.

If I had to sum it up: the Dino feels honest and a bit utilitarian; the S3 feels like someone actually cared how it looks on Christmas morning photos.

Ride Comfort & Handling

Neither of these scooters has suspension, and both roll on small solid wheels-so temper your expectations. This is not luxury-car comfort; this is "I am short, my bones are young, and I can take it" comfort.

The Dino's tiny solid wheels and steel frame transmit a lot of what's happening underfoot. On fresh asphalt, it's fine-kids glide happily and forget the world exists. The moment you hit older pavement with cracks, tree roots or paving blocks, you feel every joint through the deck and bars. After a few kilometres of broken sidewalk, my knees had opinions, even if the kids didn't complain.

The SIMATE S3's slightly larger front wheel and aluminium chassis give it a marginally more composed feel. It still chatters over tactile paving and rough concrete, but the steering feels a bit more precise and less "skittery". The deck is slightly more confidence-inspiring when weaving around pedestrians or swerving to avoid an unexpected football.

In slow-speed manoeuvres-tight U-turns in a narrow path, for instance-the Dino's lower bar range and shorter wheelbase make it very easy for smaller riders to control, almost like a normal kick scooter that happens to have a motor. The S3, with its more grown-up cockpit, feels a touch more serious, which some kids love and some younger ones initially find a bit intimidating.

Comfort verdict: neither is plush; the S3 feels a bit more grown-up and composed, while the Dino is simple and approachable but harsher on bad surfaces.

Performance

Both motors are firmly in the "kid-safe, parent-approved" power class. Don't expect arm-stretching launches-but also don't underestimate how fast the ground approaches when you're ninety centimetres off it.

The Dino's motor delivers a very gentle, predictable shove. It's enough to make a seven-year-old feel like a superhero and keep up with jogging parents, but its acceleration is in no hurry. From a standstill, it eases into speed without any surprises. Top speed feels exciting for kids, but as an adult riding it, you quickly find the ceiling and stay there-there's not much "headroom" beyond cruising pace.

The SIMATE S3, though slightly lower-powered on paper, feels a bit more willing. Throttle response is nicely linear, and once you're rolling, it pulls to its capped speed with more enthusiasm. It never turns into a missile, but it does have a touch more urgency. That's helped by the brushless motor, which feels smoother and more refined than the Dino's setup.

Hill behaviour is where reality bites. On mild slopes, both cope fine with lightweight kids; heavier riders quickly reveal the limits. The Dino slows and eventually begs for kick assistance on anything beyond gentle inclines. The S3 hangs on a little better up moderate ramps, but expecting either to conquer serious hills is optimistic at best and wishful thinking at worst.

Braking is the real performance differentiator. The Dino relies on a rear fender brake with motor cut-off. It's simple and works, but it's hardly confidence-inspiring for quick stops, especially in the wet or with a distracted child. The S3's combination of electronic brake on the bar and a traditional rear fender brake gives more immediate, controllable stopping power. Kids adapt quickly to using the thumb brake, and the foot brake remains their comfort blanket.

In terms of "fun-to-risk ratio", the S3 nails it slightly better: just enough zip to make kids feel fast, paired with brakes that don't feel like an afterthought.

Battery & Range

On paper, the Dino has a noticeably larger battery, and it shows in practice. In real life with a kid who alternates between full throttle and random stops to look at dogs, you can squeeze a surprisingly long ride out of a single charge. Short daily park trips barely move the metaphorical needle; you'll often go several days before needing to remember where you left the charger.

The SIMATE S3, by comparison, has a smaller tank. For typical kid use, you're in the "one solid session, maybe two shorter ones" territory before it wants a socket again. For many families, that's still a full afternoon of fun, but if your child treats the neighbourhood like a personal Grand Tour circuit, the S3 will tap out sooner than the Dino.

The flip side: SIMATE's smaller battery refills faster. If the scooter limps home before lunch, plug it in and by mid-afternoon it's usually game-ready again. The Dino takes longer to soak up a full charge, which is fair considering there's simply more energy to pump in.

Range anxiety for kids is more about disappointment than logistics. On that front, the Dino is the safer bet for longer weekend strolls where you don't want to end up carrying both scooter and sulking rider. The S3's shorter stamina is tolerable, but clearly where SIMATE has economised.

Portability & Practicality

Both scooters sit in the "yes, I can carry this with one hand while holding a coffee in the other, sort of" weight class. The Dino is only slightly heavier, but its steel frame makes it feel denser when you're lugging it up stairs or into a car boot. It's still very manageable, just less airy than the spec sheet suggests.

The S3's aluminium frame and compact fold make it genuinely easy to live with. The folding mechanism is smoother and feels more secure when locked; there's less of that budget-scooter rattle. Folded, it's a neat, tight package you can stuff between luggage or hide behind a wardrobe. For flat dwellers and boot-Tetris experts, this matters more than you'd think.

For kids handling the scooters themselves, younger riders will find the Dino's lower handlebar range less awkward to manoeuvre. Older kids, especially heading into early teens, gravitate toward the S3: it looks cooler to roll alongside you, folded, like they're wheeling proper kit rather than a toy.

Everyday practicality is also about where they can be used. Both are strictly pavement machines: small solid wheels and low ground clearance mean grass, gravel and cobbles are more punishment than play. The Dino is slightly more sensitive to rough patches due to its smaller wheels; the S3 handles transitions-kerb ramps, joins in concrete-a little more gracefully.

Safety

These are children's vehicles, so safety isn't a side note-it's the main course.

The Dino's headline safety feature is its motor cut-off tied to the rear brake. Step on the rear fender, and the motor instantly stops pushing. That's hugely important for beginners who instinctively stomp on the back brake when panicking. It's simple, reliable and-compared with the absolute no-name toys out there-genuinely reassuring.

Where the Dino falls behind is redundancy. There's one basic mechanical brake and no handlebar-controlled braking. Wet shoes, tired legs or slightly slick pavement, and stopping distances creep up more than I'd like for something aimed at kids.

The SIMATE S3 takes a more modern approach. The kick-to-start system prevents "garage missile" launches, where a child hits throttle from a standstill and the scooter shoots away. They have to push up to a gentle roll before the motor will join the party. Add an electronic brake on the bar plus the familiar rear fender brake, and you get layered, intuitive stopping with more control and less drama.

Lighting is another area where both cut corners in different ways. The Dino essentially assumes daylight use and bright paint will be enough; there's no proper integrated headlight, and parents will inevitably end up buying clip-on solutions if dusk rides are on the menu. The S3 adds decorative deck and stem LEDs, which dramatically improve side visibility and, just as important, the "cool factor"-but still doesn't really solve forward illumination for darker paths. Again: very much daytime machines.

Stability-wise, both are low-speed, small-wheel scooters, so they'll never match a big-tyre adult commuter. Within that class, the S3 feels slightly more planted, particularly in sudden direction changes or emergency swerves. The Dino is fine until surfaces get sketchy, at which point the tiny wheels and harsher ride make it more nervous.

Community Feedback

ELJET Dino SIMATE S3
What riders love
Low price, surprisingly solid steel frame, long playtime per charge, telescopic handlebar that "grows" with kids, simple controls, very light to carry, and the motor cut-off when braking.
What riders love
Lightweight aluminium build, dual brakes with kick-to-start safety, modern look with LEDs, clear display, quick charging, easy folding, and "feels like a real scooter, not a toy".
What riders complain about
Bumpy ride on rough sidewalks, very small wheels catching in cracks, no built-in lights, weak hill performance, longish charge time, and "toy-like" features as kids grow older.
What riders complain about
Shorter range than expected, harsh ride on bad pavement, noticeable power drop with heavier kids, slippery on wet smooth surfaces, fixed handlebar height, and no proper headlight.

Price & Value

The Dino is notably cheaper and offers a bigger battery for the money. If your primary metric is "how many hours of occupied, happy child per euro do I get?", the Dino has a strong case. It keeps running, requires virtually no maintenance and doesn't pretend to be anything more sophisticated than it is.

The SIMATE S3 asks for a noticeable premium for less battery, similar speed and comparable build size. What you're really paying for is the more modern platform: brushless motor, dual braking, integrated display, lighter frame and that all-important kid-approved aesthetic. From a pure spec-sheet perspective the price looks ambitious; from a daily-use and "my kid actually wants to ride this" perspective, it starts to make more sense.

In long-term value, the Dino's adjustable bar helps it stay suitable across more of the growth curve, but its toy-ish character starts to feel childish sooner. The S3 may technically fit a narrower height range well, yet it remains socially acceptable for older kids for longer-status is currency too, at that age.

Service & Parts Availability

ELJET has a decent footprint in Central Europe and enough brand history that you're not dealing with a temporary logo slapped on a container load. Basic spares-tyres (even if they're solid), levers, stands-are usually obtainable, and local retailers know the brand. That said, we're not talking high-end modularity; if the electronics fail out of warranty, repair economics can get questionable relative to the scooter's purchase price.

SIMATE is less of an old guard brand, but has carved itself a comfortable corner in the "fun mobility" niche and appears on major retail platforms with support that, so far, hasn't vanished overnight. Documentation is generally better, assembly support is clear, and warranty handling is reported as reasonable. As with the Dino, though, this is a budget kids' scooter: at a certain point, "replace rather than repair" will be the financially rational choice.

Neither brand offers the ecosystem depth of premium adult-scooter makers, but within the kid-scooter universe, both are a step up from the anonymous white-label lottery.

Pros & Cons Summary

ELJET Dino SIMATE S3
Pros
  • Very affordable entry price
  • Larger battery, longer real range
  • Telescopic handlebar grows with kids
  • Simple controls, easy first e-scooter
  • Motor cut-off linked to brake
  • Solid, durable steel frame
  • Maintenance-free solid tyres
  • Lightweight and compact when folded
Pros
  • Light aluminium frame, very portable
  • Dual brakes + kick-to-start safety
  • Integrated LED display and lights
  • Modern, "grown-up" design kids love
  • Smooth brushless motor feel
  • Fast charging turnaround
  • Confident folding mechanism
  • Good stability for the class
Cons
  • Harsh ride on rough pavement
  • Very small wheels, more prone to catching
  • No integrated front or rear lights
  • Basic braking performance only
  • Longer charging time
  • Feels like a toy as kids age
  • Strictly fair-weather, pavement-only
Cons
  • Shorter range, small battery
  • No real headlight despite LEDs
  • Fixed handlebar height limits fit
  • Noticeable power loss with heavier riders
  • Harsh over rough surfaces
  • Not hill-friendly beyond mild slopes
  • Pricey for the raw specs

Parameters Comparison

Parameter ELJET Dino SIMATE S3
Motor power (rated) 150 W 130 W
Top speed 13 km/h 14 km/h
Claimed range 11 km 5-8 km
Realistic kid range (approx.) 7-9 km 5-6 km
Battery capacity 96 Wh (24 V / 4 Ah) 60 Wh (24 V / 2,5 Ah)
Charging time 3-4 h 2-3 h
Weight 9 kg 8,2 kg
Max load 65 kg 70 kg
Brakes Rear mechanical + motor cut-off Electronic front (thumb) + rear foot
Suspension None None
Tyres 5,5" solid rubber / PU 6,5" front / 5,5" rear solid rubber
Frame material Steel Aluminium alloy
Handlebar Telescopic, adjustable height Fixed height
Display Basic / none LED display (speed, battery)
Lights None integrated Decorative LED deck/stem (selected models)
Folded size (approx.) 74 x 36 x 91 cm (unfolded length as reference; compact fold) 90 x 37 x 32 cm
Price 111 € 153 €

Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?

If I had to pick one to put under a typical European family's Christmas tree, I'd lean toward the SIMATE S3. The dual brakes, kick-to-start, smoother motor and more stable chassis make it the more confidence-inspiring ride overall, and the modern design and display mean kids actually want to use it-crucial for any gadget that competes with screens.

That said, the ELJET Dino is far from a bad choice. For younger, lighter riders in flat areas-and for parents who prioritise longer range and lower price over gadgets-the Dino is a perfectly rational buy, provided you accept the harsher ride and basic braking. If you're the type who sees this as a strict "tool for fun" with a budget ceiling, the Dino ticks the necessary boxes.

But if your goal is a kids' scooter that feels less like a disposable toy and more like a shrunken, sensible e-vehicle-with safety tech to match-the SIMATE S3 is the more rounded, future-proofed pick, despite its slightly cheeky battery and price.

Numbers Freaks Corner

Weight to power ratio (kg/W)
Metric ELJET Dino SIMATE S3
Price per Wh (€/Wh) ✅ 1,16 €/Wh ❌ 2,55 €/Wh
Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) ✅ 8,54 €/km/h ❌ 10,93 €/km/h
Weight per Wh (g/Wh) ✅ 93,75 g/Wh ❌ 136,67 g/Wh
Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) ❌ 0,69 kg/km/h ✅ 0,59 kg/km/h
Price per km of real-world range (€/km) ✅ 13,88 €/km ❌ 27,82 €/km
Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) ✅ 1,13 kg/km ❌ 1,49 kg/km
Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) ❌ 12,00 Wh/km ✅ 10,91 Wh/km
Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) ✅ 11,54 W/km/h ❌ 9,29 W/km/h
Weight to power ratio (kg/W)✅ 0,06 kg/W✅ 0,06 kg/W
Average charging speed (W) ✅ 27,43 W ❌ 24,00 W

These metrics look purely at maths, not emotions. Price-per-Wh and price-per-km/h show how much energy and speed you buy for every euro. Weight-based metrics highlight how efficiently each scooter uses its mass to deliver energy, speed and range. Wh per km is energy efficiency: lower means the scooter uses the battery more frugally. Power-to-speed and weight-to-power capture how muscular the motor feels relative to speed and heft, while average charging speed tells you how quickly the battery refills in practice.

Author's Category Battle

Category ELJET Dino SIMATE S3
Weight ❌ Slightly heavier, denser feel ✅ Lighter aluminium, easier carry
Range ✅ Longer realistic kid range ❌ Shorter sessions per charge
Max Speed ❌ Slightly slower top pace ✅ Tiny bit faster cruising
Power ✅ Stronger push for class ❌ Feels a bit softer
Battery Size ✅ Bigger pack, more Wh ❌ Smaller battery capacity
Suspension ❌ No suspension at all ❌ No suspension at all
Design ❌ Feels toy-like, basic ✅ Modern, "real scooter" vibe
Safety ❌ Single brake, basic safety ✅ Dual brakes, kick-to-start
Practicality ✅ Telescopic bar, decent fold ✅ Very compact, easy fold
Comfort ❌ Harsher, tiny wheels ✅ Slightly more composed ride
Features ❌ Very barebones package ✅ Display, LEDs, dual brake
Serviceability ✅ Simple, fewer things to break ❌ More electronics to fail
Customer Support ✅ Established regional presence ✅ Generally responsive brand
Fun Factor ❌ Fun but clearly "kid toy" ✅ Feels cooler, more exciting
Build Quality ❌ Sturdy but a bit crude ✅ More refined, better finish
Component Quality ❌ Very basic components ✅ Nicer controls and hardware
Brand Name ✅ Known in Central Europe ❌ Less established recognition
Community ✅ Solid local user base ❌ Smaller, more niche crowd
Lights (visibility) ❌ No integrated lighting ✅ Deck LEDs improve visibility
Lights (illumination) ❌ Needs add-on headlight ❌ Decorative, not real headlight
Acceleration ✅ Stronger push for kids ❌ Slightly more modest shove
Arrive with smile factor ❌ Fun, but looks "little kid" ✅ Kids feel properly cool
Arrive relaxed factor ❌ Harsher ride, weaker brakes ✅ Smoother, safer braking feel
Charging speed ✅ More W, faster per Wh ❌ Slower per Wh refill
Reliability ✅ Fewer features, less to fail ❌ More electronics complexity
Folded practicality ❌ Bulkier folded footprint ✅ Very compact when folded
Ease of transport ❌ Heavier, denser to carry ✅ Lighter, nicer to lift
Handling ❌ Nervous on rough surfaces ✅ More stable, predictable
Braking performance ❌ Single brake, longer stops ✅ Dual system, better control
Riding position ✅ Adjustable bar helps ergonomics ❌ Fixed bar, less adaptable
Handlebar quality ❌ Basic grips, simple setup ✅ Better grips, cleaner layout
Throttle response ❌ Functional but unrefined ✅ Smooth brushless feel
Dashboard / Display ❌ None / very minimal ✅ Clear LED display
Security (locking) ❌ No integrated options ❌ No integrated options
Weather protection ❌ Fair-weather, no rating ❌ Fair-weather, no rating
Resale value ❌ Looks "toy" second-hand ✅ Trendier, easier to resell
Tuning potential ❌ Not worth serious tuning ❌ Not worth serious tuning
Ease of maintenance ✅ Simple mechanics, solid tyres ✅ Solid tyres, straightforward too
Value for Money ✅ Better specs per euro ❌ Pay more for less range

Overall Winner Declaration

Winner

In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the ELJET Dino scores 8 points against the SIMATE S3's 3. In the Author's Category Battle, the ELJET Dino gets 14 ✅ versus 23 ✅ for SIMATE S3 (with a few ties sprinkled in).

Totals: ELJET Dino scores 22, SIMATE S3 scores 26.

Based on the scoring, the SIMATE S3 is our overall winner. Riding both back-to-back, the SIMATE S3 simply feels like the more complete little machine: safer to stop, nicer to look at, a bit more composed when the pavement gets scrappy, and just "grown-up" enough that kids take it seriously. The ELJET Dino's wallet-friendly price and bigger battery are genuinely attractive, but you're reminded of its toy roots every time the surface worsens or you wish for a better brake. If you want a kids' scooter that feels like a compromise you can live with for a few years rather than something you'll be itching to replace next season, the S3 is the one that will age more gracefully-in your hallway and in your child's eyes.

That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.