Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
If you want the more serious, comfort-focused commuter and can stretch the budget, the Fluid Horizon is the better overall scooter: it rides softer, feels more planted at speed, and is simply more pleasant on battered city streets. The Hiboy KS4 Pro fights back with a much lower price, solid no-flat tyres, an IP rating and an app, making it attractive if your wallet shouts louder than your spine.
Pick the Horizon if you care about comfort, suspension, and a "small but grown-up" feel. Choose the KS4 Pro if you just want a cheap, punchy, low-maintenance tool for mostly decent roads and you're willing to tolerate a harsher ride and more budget-y feel.
Both can get you to work; how you'll feel when you arrive is the real story-so let's dig into that.
Electric scooters have reached that awkward adolescence where everyone claims to be a "commuter king" and yet half of them still ride like upgraded rental toys. The Fluid Horizon and Hiboy KS4 Pro sit right in the hot zone: practical range, decent speed, survivable weight, and prices that don't require a second mortgage.
I've spent a lot of saddle-less kilometres on both of these. On paper they look surprisingly similar: single rear motor, city-level speeds, mid-sized batteries, modest weight. In practice, they target slightly different commuters-and reveal their compromises in different, sometimes annoying, ways.
The Horizon is your "mini tank with suspension" for rough cities; the KS4 Pro is your "cheap, no-flat hammer" for smoother tarmac and tight budgets. They're worthy rivals, but not equally good at everything. Let's break down where each one shines, and where the marketing gloss starts to crack.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
Both scooters live in the urban commuter category: think daily rides of roughly a dozen kilometres each way, mostly on roads, bike lanes and passable pavements rather than forest trails or BMX tracks. They're both far more capable than basic rental clones, but nowhere near the "I need motorbike armour" performance class.
The Fluid Horizon positions itself as a compact yet serious commuter: higher-voltage system, proper dual suspension and a chassis that's been around the block under various badges. It's for the rider who has decided scooters are not a toy and wants something that feels like a small vehicle rather than a folding gadget.
The Hiboy KS4 Pro is the budget insurgent. It's cheaper by a big margin, offers similar motor grunt, solid tyres for zero flats, and throws in app connectivity and an IP rating to sweeten the deal. It aims at first-time owners who want to get from A to B with minimal fiddling and minimal expense.
They're natural competitors because a lot of people end up choosing between "stretch for the more serious Horizon" or "save money and live with the KS4 compromises". Let's see what those compromises look like in real use.
Design & Build Quality
Side by side, the design philosophies are obvious. The Horizon looks and feels like an industrial tool: mostly metal, few frills, subtle finish. Nothing screams for attention, which is good if you'd rather not advertise your scooter to thieves. The folding joints, levers and hinges feel dense, with that slightly overbuilt vibe of a frame that's been iterated for years.
The KS4 Pro is more "modern consumer electronics": cleaner cable routing, a big central display, and a little more visual polish with accents and ambient lighting. The frame itself is decently stout for the price, but some details-screws, plastics, cable grommets-remind you this is a cost-driven product. It's not fragile, but you do get that "check the bolts after a week" feeling.
In the hands, the Horizon's stem and folding hardware feel tighter and more robust. The telescopic stem and folding handlebars add complexity but, to Fluid's credit, they don't feel like they'll disintegrate after a month on cobblestones. The KS4's one-step folding is simpler and quicker, and the stem latch to the rear fender is convenient, but the whole unit feels a little more "appliance" than "equipment".
Neither is what I'd call premium in the high-end sense, but if I had to bet on which chassis will still be clunking along in five years with only cosmetic scars, the Horizon gets my vote.
Ride Comfort & Handling
This is where the two scooters really part ways.
The Fluid Horizon runs a small front air tyre and a solid rear, but crucially backs that up with a front spring and a surprisingly effective dual rear suspension setup. In the city, that combination is gold. You can roll over expansion joints, rough asphalt, and those charming "historic" cobbles without feeling like your knees are being audited. The scooter has a slightly short, narrow stance, but once you adapt your foot position, it feels composed and forgiving.
The KS4 Pro leans heavily on its larger honeycomb solid tyres and a lone rear shock. On smooth tarmac, the ride is fine-almost plush for a budget solid-tyre scooter. The trouble starts when the surface deteriorates. Those tyres transmit a lot of high-frequency chatter into your hands and feet, and the rear suspension mainly helps with the bigger hits. On bad pavements, you'll quickly discover just how much your knees can bend.
In corners, the Horizon's smaller wheels are offset by that well-damped suspension and a low, planted feel. It tracks predictably, even when the surface is broken, although the solid rear tyre demands a bit of respect in cold or wet conditions. The KS4 Pro benefits from its taller wheels and longer deck; it feels stable at its more modest top speed, but the lack of front suspension and the stiff tyres mean mid-corner bumps can unsettle the front end more.
If your city engineers hate cyclists and scooter riders, the Horizon's comfort advantage is very real. If your commute is mostly fresh asphalt, the KS4 Pro's harsher ride is tolerable, but you won't confuse it with a suspended pneumatic setup.
Performance
Both scooters use rear hub motors in the roughly half-kilowatt class, and both feel downright lively compared to typical rental scooters.
The Horizon has that familiar 48 V "snap" off the line. From a standstill up to city traffic pace, it pulls eagerly, with enough torque to shove you backwards if you forget to brace. It comfortably exceeds typical bike-lane speeds, and still feels reasonably composed when it runs out of gearing. On hills, the higher-voltage system and torquey rear motor keep it moving where cheaper scooters just wheeze.
The KS4 Pro is tuned more gently but still feels sprightly for its price. Acceleration is smooth and linear rather than dramatic, which is pleasant in traffic-you don't have to baby the throttle to avoid lurching. Its top speed ceiling sits a clear notch below the Horizon's, which you really notice when keeping pace with faster cyclists or when you'd like that bit of extra headroom to clear a junction.
Under load on steeper hills, the KS4 Pro copes better than the usual budget suspects, but heavier riders will see its limits sooner than on the Horizon. You'll make it up, but you're not exactly setting segment KOMs.
Braking is an interesting contrast. The Horizon relies on a rear drum plus regen. It's predictable and very low-maintenance, but all the braking is at the back, so emergency stops rely more on tyre grip than outright bite. The KS4 Pro counters with a rear disc plus front electronic brake: more initial grab and a bit more overall stopping authority when properly adjusted, albeit with the extra faff of disc alignment and the occasional squeak.
For outright performance and confidence at the top end, the Horizon is ahead. For controlled, beginner-friendly power and decent brakes at a low price, the KS4 Pro holds its own.
Battery & Range
Both scooters claim ranges optimistic enough to make any marketing department proud. Reality is kinder to one of them than the other.
The Horizon in its common mid-sized battery configuration gives you a comfortably "real" range for typical commutes even if you ride enthusiastically. Ride it hard, throw in some hills, and you still have enough buffer not to sweat getting home. Its 48 V system tends to hold its top speed a bit better as the battery depletes, so you don't feel it turning into a slug in the last third of the charge.
The KS4 Pro packs a respectable battery for its price, but it's working with a lower-voltage system and solid tyres that aren't exactly paragons of rolling efficiency. In day-to-day use, you're looking at enough juice for a medium commute and maybe a quick detour, but if you spend lots of time at full throttle, you'll nudge closer to the lower end of its claimed window.
Charging times are similar; think "overnight or one workday" for both. Neither offers genuinely fast charging out of the box. Range anxiety is less of an issue on the Horizon simply because you start with more cushion and slightly better efficiency; the KS4 Pro is fine if your commute is modest, but you need to be more honest with yourself about distance and terrain.
Portability & Practicality
On a scale from "featherweight you can carry like a laptop" to "why didn't I buy a parking permit instead", both scooters sit somewhere in the realistic middle.
The KS4 Pro is a touch lighter, and you feel that when you're lugging it up stairs or heaving it into a car boot. The one-step folding mechanism and stem latch to the rear fender are quick and intuitive, and the folded package is compact enough for under-desk or hallway storage. For short carries-train platforms, a flight or two of stairs-it's acceptable. For daily schleps to a fourth-floor flat, it'll get old.
The Horizon is the denser brick. On paper it's only slightly heavier, but the weight feels more concentrated. The flip side is that its folded footprint is impressively small thanks to the telescopic stem and folding handlebars. Under a desk, between train seats, or into a tiny lift, it slides in where many competitors are awkward. Add trolley wheels (a common mod) and it becomes a rollable suitcase rather than dead weight.
In everyday commuting, the Horizon is the better multi-modal companion if you're more often rolling than carrying. If your routine involves regular lifting and not much public transport squeezing, the KS4 Pro's lower weight and simpler fold win back some points.
Safety
Safety is more than just brakes and lights, but those are a good start.
The Horizon offers a conservative but predictable safety package. The rear drum plus regen brake is consistent in dry and wet, and there's no exposed rotor to bend. However, with all braking at the rear and a solid rear tyre, hard stops on slick surfaces can get interesting if you're ham-fisted. Lighting is plentiful but poorly placed: low-mounted front LEDs are great for being seen, less great for spotting that crater lurking twenty metres ahead. The chassis itself feels solid and wobble-free, which does wonders for confidence at higher speeds.
The KS4 Pro leans into visibility: a bright bar-mounted headlight, brake-activated tail light and side lighting make you stand out from more angles, especially at junctions. Braking, with its disc plus electronic front assist, feels a bit more forceful when dialled in, and the larger wheels help stability when you hit imperfections mid-brake. Its big safety ace is the solid, no-flat tyre setup: no sudden blowouts, no tubes bursting on a pothole at speed.
Water is an elephant in the room. The KS4 Pro at least has an official splash rating-fine for drizzle and wet roads if you're sensible. The Horizon has no formal IP rating, and while plenty of riders survive light rain, you're rolling the dice more when the sky opens. Also, that solid rear tyre on the Horizon is noticeably less forgiving on wet paint and metal than the Hiboy's honeycomb design.
Overall, the Horizon feels like the more stable, serious machine at speed; the KS4 Pro counters with better visibility and official weather tolerance. Pick your flavour of "safer".
Community Feedback
| Fluid Horizon | HIBOY KS4 Pro |
|---|---|
What riders love
|
What riders love
|
What riders complain about
|
What riders complain about
|
Price & Value
This is where the KS4 Pro stomps into the room and slaps a price tag on the table.
The Horizon sits in the mid-range price band. For that, you get proper suspension at both ends, a higher-voltage system, a sturdier chassis and support from a specialist retailer that actually stocks parts and answers emails. If you use it daily, the cost per ride over a few years makes sense, but it is undeniably a bigger upfront commitment than many casual buyers were planning to make for "just a scooter".
The KS4 Pro costs roughly half as much, which is... not subtle. And for that money, you get a motor class that would, a few years ago, have been considered firmly mid-range, plus suspension, an app, and no-flat tyres. It absolutely demolishes a lot of supermarket specials in terms of usable performance and features.
The catch is that the saving comes from somewhere: harsher ride, simpler build quality, more DIY tightening and tweaking. If money is tight, it's a very compelling package. If you can reasonably afford to spend more for something that will treat your joints better and potentially age more gracefully, the Horizon starts to look like the more sensible long-term tool.
Service & Parts Availability
The Fluid Horizon benefits massively from being sold by a specialist retailer that's deeply embedded in the scooter scene. Need a new fender, suspension bushing, or even a controller after a mishap? You can actually order the part without spelunking through obscure marketplaces. Community experience with support is generally strong; there's a sense you're buying into an ecosystem rather than a one-off box.
Hiboy is a big-volume brand with global reach and a decent reputation among budget manufacturers. They do provide warranty support and will often ship replacement parts like chargers, fenders or even major components when things go wrong reasonably early in the scooter's life. What you don't quite get is the same depth of long-term parts curation; after a couple of years, finding specific spares can become more of a game.
For European riders, neither is as seamless as buying from a local brick-and-mortar shop, but the Horizon edges ahead on structured parts support and community knowledge. The KS4 Pro is serviceable, but you're a bit more in "mass-market gadget" territory.
Pros & Cons Summary
| Fluid Horizon | HIBOY KS4 Pro |
|---|---|
Pros
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
Cons
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | Fluid Horizon | HIBOY KS4 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Motor power (rated / peak) | 500 W / 800 W | 500 W / 750 W |
| Top speed | ca. 37 km/h | ca. 30 km/h |
| Claimed range | ca. 37 km | up to 40 km |
| Realistic range (mixed use) | ca. 25-28 km | ca. 25-30 km |
| Battery capacity | ca. 500 Wh | 417 Wh |
| Battery voltage | 48 V | 36 V |
| Weight | 19,1 kg | 17,5 kg |
| Brakes | Rear drum + regen | Rear disc + front electronic |
| Suspension | Front spring + rear dual | Rear shock only |
| Tyres | Front pneumatic, rear solid | 10" honeycomb solid |
| Max load | 120 kg | 100 kg |
| IP rating | None stated | IPX4 |
| Typical price | ca. 704 € | ca. 355 € |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
If we strip away the spec sheets and focus on how they feel after a week of commuting, the Fluid Horizon comes out as the more serious, grown-up scooter. It rides better, copes with nastier roads, inspires more confidence at speed and feels like it's built to survive years of abuse with the occasional bolt check and brake tweak. If your scooter is going to replace a fair chunk of your public transport or car journeys, that matters more than app gimmicks.
The HIBOY KS4 Pro, though, is extremely hard to ignore at its price. For around half the money, you get genuinely usable speed, decent range, acceptable brakes, weather tolerance and the bliss of never, ever changing a tube. If your roads are relatively smooth, your commute is modest, and you're watching your budget, it's a very rational choice-as long as you accept the rougher ride and slightly cheaper feel.
My take is simple: if you can stretch the budget without eating instant noodles for a year, the Horizon is the more complete, more satisfying scooter to live with. If that price jump makes you wince, the KS4 Pro is a perfectly serviceable, no-frills workhorse that will still beat sitting in traffic. Decide whether your priority is long-term comfort and refinement, or minimum outlay and minimum maintenance, and the choice between these two becomes surprisingly clear.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | Fluid Horizon | HIBOY KS4 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ❌ 1,41 €/Wh | ✅ 0,85 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ❌ 19,03 €/km/h | ✅ 11,83 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ✅ 38,20 g/Wh | ❌ 41,97 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | ✅ 0,52 kg/km/h | ❌ 0,58 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ❌ 26,57 €/km | ✅ 12,91 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ❌ 0,72 kg/km | ✅ 0,64 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ❌ 18,87 Wh/km | ✅ 15,16 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ❌ 13,51 W/km/h | ✅ 16,67 W/km/h |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | ❌ 0,0382 kg/W | ✅ 0,0350 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ✅ 83,33 W | ❌ 69,50 W |
These metrics compare how efficiently each scooter turns money, weight, battery capacity and power into speed and range. Lower values generally mean you get more performance or range per euro, per kilogram, or per watt-hour, except where noted. For example, price-per-Wh and price-per-kilometre show raw cost efficiency, while weight-per-Wh and weight-per-km/h highlight how much bulk you carry for the performance you get. Efficiency in Wh per km indicates how gently the scooter sips energy, while ratios like power-to-speed and weight-to-power reveal how "overbuilt" or "stressed" the motor is for the speeds achieved. Charging speed simply shows how quickly the battery can be refilled given its size.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | Fluid Horizon | HIBOY KS4 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ❌ Heavier to haul around | ✅ Slightly lighter, easier lifts |
| Range | ✅ Better buffer at high speed | ❌ Similar but less forgiving |
| Max Speed | ✅ Noticeably faster cruising | ❌ Lower top-end ceiling |
| Power | ✅ Stronger feel under load | ❌ Softer, less grunt overall |
| Battery Size | ✅ Larger, higher-voltage pack | ❌ Smaller 36 V battery |
| Suspension | ✅ Real dual-end suspension | ❌ Single rear, limited help |
| Design | ✅ Utilitarian, solid hardware | ❌ More gadget than tool |
| Safety | ✅ Stable chassis at higher speed | ❌ Harsher, less composed rough |
| Practicality | ✅ Super compact folded footprint | ❌ Simpler but bulkier fold |
| Comfort | ✅ Clearly smoother on bad roads | ❌ Vibrates on rough surfaces |
| Features | ❌ Basic display, no app | ✅ App, lock, extras included |
| Serviceability | ✅ Parts and guides abundant | ❌ More generic, less curated |
| Customer Support | ✅ Specialist retailer backing | ✅ Responsive mass-market support |
| Fun Factor | ✅ Punchier, more engaging ride | ❌ Functional rather than exciting |
| Build Quality | ✅ Feels sturdier, less flex | ❌ More budget in details |
| Component Quality | ✅ Better suspension, hardware | ❌ Cost-cut choices visible |
| Brand Name | ✅ Enthusiast-focused reputation | ❌ Generic budget perception |
| Community | ✅ Strong enthusiast user base | ✅ Huge mainstream owner pool |
| Lights (visibility) | ❌ Lower, less side presence | ✅ High, bright, side glow |
| Lights (illumination) | ❌ Low beam, short reach | ✅ Bar-mounted, better throw |
| Acceleration | ✅ Stronger, snappier launch | ❌ Calmer, more modest pull |
| Arrive with smile factor | ✅ Feels like a "real" ride | ❌ More tool, less joy |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ✅ Suspension saves your joints | ❌ Buzzier, more fatigue |
| Charging speed | ✅ Slightly faster per Wh | ❌ Slower relative to capacity |
| Reliability | ✅ Proven platform, robust feel | ❌ More screw and brake fuss |
| Folded practicality | ✅ Tiny package, easy stash | ❌ Longer, more awkward shape |
| Ease of transport | ❌ Heavier to carry stairs | ✅ Lighter, simpler to lug |
| Handling | ✅ Composed, confident, predictable | ❌ Harsher, skips on bumps |
| Braking performance | ❌ Rear-biased, less initial bite | ✅ Disc plus e-ABS combo |
| Riding position | ✅ Adjustable height, adaptable | ❌ Fixed setup, less flexible |
| Handlebar quality | ❌ Narrow, grips can twist | ✅ Comfortable, more conventional |
| Throttle response | ✅ Punchy yet controllable | ✅ Smooth, beginner friendly |
| Dashboard / Display | ❌ Dated, weak in bright sun | ✅ Larger, more modern look |
| Security (locking) | ❌ No electronic lock options | ✅ App lock adds resistance |
| Weather protection | ❌ No formal water rating | ✅ IPX4 splash resistance |
| Resale value | ✅ Stronger brand, support | ❌ Budget image, more drop |
| Tuning potential | ✅ Popular for mods, parts | ❌ Less enthusiast ecosystem |
| Ease of maintenance | ✅ Drum and solid rear easy | ❌ Disc rubs, bolts loosen |
| Value for Money | ❌ Good, but not cheap | ✅ Outstanding for the price |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the FLUID HORIZON scores 3 points against the HIBOY KS4 Pro's 7. In the Author's Category Battle, the FLUID HORIZON gets 28 ✅ versus 14 ✅ for HIBOY KS4 Pro (with a few ties sprinkled in).
Totals: FLUID HORIZON scores 31, HIBOY KS4 Pro scores 21.
Based on the scoring, the FLUID HORIZON is our overall winner. Between these two, the Fluid Horizon simply feels more like a proper little vehicle than a clever gadget. It rides with more composure, treats your body more kindly, and inspires more confidence when you're actually relying on it day in, day out. The Hiboy KS4 Pro earns real respect for how much it delivers for so little money, but once you've spent a week floating over rough streets on the Horizon's suspension, it's hard to go back to the KS4's buzz and budget edges. If you can justify the extra outlay, the Horizon is the scooter you're more likely to still be happily riding a few years from now.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.

