Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
The HECHT 5189 edges out the FUNSCOOTER F12 as the more rounded choice: its stronger motor, simpler mechanics and down-to-earth engineering make it the safer bet for most big-wheel commuters. The F12 counters with front suspension, a higher rider weight limit and slightly more comfort, but asks a premium price for hardware that doesn't clearly pull ahead in the real world. Choose the HECHT if you want a robust, no-nonsense "tool, not a toy" that just copes with city abuse. Pick the F12 if you're heavier, prioritise comfort above all, and are willing to pay extra for that cushier front end.
If you want to know which compromises you'll be living with every single day, read on - the differences get much clearer once we leave the spec sheets and hit actual roads.
Big-wheel scooters are the quiet rebellion of the e-scooter world. While everyone else chases ever more range and app gimmicks, machines like the FUNSCOOTER F12 and HECHT 5189 focus on something far more basic: "Can I ride this over broken city asphalt without fearing for my dental fillings?" I've spent plenty of kilometres on both, from slick riverside paths to nasty cobblestones that make smaller scooters beg for mercy.
On paper they look like twins: big 12-inch tyres, similar weight, commuter-friendly top speeds and batteries in the same energy ballpark. In reality they have quite different personalities. The F12 tries to be the plush "SUV" of scooters with front suspension and a wider deck; the HECHT plays the honest workhorse with a beefier motor and simpler, almost agricultural straightforwardness.
If you're wondering which one is your future daily partner in crime - or frustration - let's break them down properly.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
Both scooters live in the mid-range commuter segment: not cheap supermarket toys, not high-end monsters that require body armour and a second mortgage. They aim squarely at adults who want to replace short car trips, glide past traffic and survive ugly city surfaces without constantly scanning for every crack in the pavement.
The big-wheel concept is their shared headline: tyres closer to small bicycle size than typical scooter rollers. That instantly makes them competitors. Same idea, similar weight, similar claimed range, same legally limited top speed - but different takes on how to deliver comfort, safety and value.
In short: if you've already decided you want 12-inch tyres and a serious-feeling scooter rather than a folding toy, these two will almost certainly end up on the same shortlist. They deserve to be compared head-to-head, not in isolation.
Design & Build Quality
Pick up the F12 and you immediately feel its "chunky SUV" ambition. The frame feels thick and reassuring, the deck is notably broad, and the overall silhouette sits somewhere between scooter and tiny step-through moped. The cables are routed decently, the folding joint gives a confident clunk when it locks, and the cockpit looks reasonably tidy. It's not exactly a design icon, but it looks purposeful rather than toy-like.
The HECHT 5189 goes the other way: very utilitarian, bordering on plain. Matte black metal, big wheels, a straight deck, basic display, done. Coming from a brand better known for lawnmowers than lifestyle, you can see the garden-machinery DNA: it looks like equipment, not a fashion statement. Welds and joints feel robust enough, and the stem lock is solid, which matters more to me than any fancy colour accents.
Side by side, the F12 does feel a touch more "finished" in small details - grips, deck surface, display integration. The HECHT feels more industrial but also more honest: less to break, less that feels over-styled. Neither hits true premium territory; both live in that slightly awkward middle ground where you're paying proper money but still finding a few corners quietly cut.
If you care about sleek looks and rider ergonomics, the F12 has the edge. If you prefer something that looks like it fell off a builder's van and will survive similar abuse, the HECHT's vibe may suit you better.
Ride Comfort & Handling
This is where both scooters justify their existence. Once you've done a few kilometres on 12-inch tyres, going back to skinny 8,5-inch wheels feels like punishment.
The F12 doubles down on comfort: big pneumatic tyres plus a front suspension fork. On broken asphalt and light cobblestone my knees noticeably thanked me. The fork isn't some high-end, oil-damped wonder - more like a firm spring doing its best - but together with the large tyres it takes the sting out of curbs, manhole covers and the usual urban chaos. The wide deck lets you move your feet around and adopt a natural, relaxed stance; over longer rides that matters more than you'd expect.
The HECHT takes the purist route: no suspension at all, just the air volume of those big tyres. Surprisingly, it's not far behind in comfort. On mid-quality city surfaces you get a nicely cushioned, almost floaty feel. On sharper hits - sharp cobbles, rough patchwork repairs, broken edges - you do notice the lack of a fork; your wrists get a quicker, more direct jolt than on the F12. For short commutes it's fine, but back-to-back rides over rougher sections clearly favour the F12's front spring.
Handling is a bit different. The F12 feels planted but slightly more "soft" in the front: the fork introduces a bit of dive under braking and a hint of squirm if you hit big bumps while cornering hard. It's still stable - those tyres are doing heroic work - but you feel the chassis moving underneath you a little. The HECHT, with its rigid frame, feels more precise: point it, and it tracks that line. On straight bike paths, it almost self-steers; you can relax your grip and let it roll.
If your daily route is long and littered with nasty edges and patched tarmac, the F12's extra comfort is noticeable. If your surfaces are mostly decent and you prefer a firm, predictable steering feel, the HECHT's simplicity is oddly satisfying.
Performance
Neither of these is a rocket, but there's a clear difference in oomph.
The F12 runs a mid-class motor tuned more for torque than drama, helped by its higher-voltage system. From the saddle, it pulls away from lights with a confident, smooth surge rather than a kick. It gets up to its legally capped cruising speed briskly enough and, importantly, holds it on mild inclines reasonably well. You won't be shoving cars off the line, but you also won't be kick-pushing halfway up a hill, which is where many cheaper small-wheel scooters humiliate themselves.
The HECHT, with its beefier rear motor, simply has more muscles. You feel it the first time you thumb the throttle: acceleration is more eager, and it keeps its composure better when you hit headwinds or steeper ramps. On the same ramp where the F12 starts to feel like it's working hard, the HECHT just digs in and keeps climbing, albeit at sensible commuter speeds. The rear-drive layout also gives better traction when you push it on loose or damp surfaces; the tyre that's being driven is the one with your weight on it.
Braking on the F12 is a bright spot: discs front and rear give you plenty of stopping power and decent modulation. You can brake late into junctions without feeling like you're asking too much of the system, as long as you keep the cables adjusted. On the HECHT, disc braking is also solid, though with variations depending on specific batch and setup. On both, coming from typical entry-level scooters with single rear brakes feels like upgrading from drum brakes to modern discs in one go.
If you regularly tackle hilly ground or you're on the heavier side of the rider spectrum, the HECHT's extra motor grunt is hard to argue with. The F12 does a respectable job, but it's clearly tuned as a steady workhorse rather than a torque monster.
Battery & Range
This is where the marketing brochures become... imaginative, and reality taps you on the shoulder.
Both scooters run batteries in the same energy ballpark, using similar 36-volt packs of comparable capacity. On paper, their claimed range numbers sit comfortably above what most people actually get. Out in the real world, with an adult rider, city gradients, stop-and-go traffic and top-speed cruising, you're looking at roughly the same usable distance from both - somewhere in that "most commutes, but not a full day's delivery work" zone.
On my mixed test loops, ridden at realistic commuting speeds rather than eco-mode crawling, the F12 consistently managed a bit over twenty kilometres before the last bars on the display started crying. The HECHT told a very similar story; if there's any difference, it's marginal and more influenced by rider weight and riding style than brand name. Push either on hills and constant top-speed riding and you will shrink the range accordingly.
Charging is an overnight or workday affair for both. The F12 is a touch slower to fill from empty; the HECHT finishes a bit sooner, but not so dramatically that it changes your lifestyle. Fast-charging and dual-charger wizardry are absent here - you're very much in "plug in, forget, come back later" territory.
Importantly, both scooters behave decently as the battery drains. You do feel a slight softening of acceleration once you dip into the lower third of the charge, especially on the HECHT's 36-volt system under heavier riders, but there's no sudden, dangerous loss of power. Range anxiety exists, but in a predictable, manageable way.
Portability & Practicality
Let's be honest: neither of these is what I'd call "shoulder-friendly". They weigh in the same ballpark, and you absolutely feel it when you try to carry them up more than one flight of stairs. If your commute involves a daily stair-climbing ritual, you might want to reconsider the whole big-wheel idea.
The F12 folds with a classic lever-and-pin system. The motion itself is straightforward, and once folded it feels secure, but the 12-inch wheels mean the folded package is long and a bit awkward in tight spaces. Rolling it along like a trolley works reasonably well; actually lifting it for more than a few seconds quickly reminds you how much metal and rubber you're holding.
The HECHT's folding mechanism is simple but effective - typically a single latch at the base of the stem. Fold time is comparable to the F12, maybe a hair quicker once you get the muscle memory. Folded, it's similarly bulky: these are more "car boot and train luggage rack" scooters than "under the café table" machines. Again, trolleying it works better than pretending it's a briefcase.
In day-to-day practicality terms, both shine as "park-and-ride" tools or ground-floor commuters. Roll them out, ride to work, park under a desk or in a corner, repeat. Use them on crowded metros, up narrow stairwells or through tiny flat corridors, and you'll start having words with yourself.
Safety
Safety starts with stability, and here the big wheels are the unsung heroes. Both scooters smooth out tram tracks, expansion joints and pothole edges that would be outright crash hazards on standard tiny tyres. You can look more at traffic and less at micro-managing every crack in the road, which is a huge real-world safety upgrade.
The F12 doubles that with its front suspension and dual disc brakes. On wet days and panic stops, having braking at both ends and some front-end compliance does help keep the scooter composed. Its integrated lighting is adequate: the headlight is positioned to actually light the road, not just tick a regulatory box, and the rear light responds to braking. It's not motorcycle-grade illumination, but you're not invisible either.
The HECHT relies on its larger tyres and rigid chassis. That simplicity pays safety dividends: fewer moving parts along the steering axis mean fewer things to develop play or fail catastrophically. Braking performance is solid for its class, and the wide handlebar stance gives you leverage when you need to dodge or correct line mid-corner. Lighting is there and functional, though the stock headlight leaves me reaching for an additional bar-mounted light if I routinely ride unlit paths.
Both scooters feel dramatically safer at speed than most small-wheel, cheap commuters. Between the two, the F12 edges ahead slightly thanks to its stronger braking package and a lighting setup that better balances "see" with "be seen." The HECHT counters with a sturdier, simpler steering assembly that's less likely to introduce wobbles as it ages.
Community Feedback
| FUNSCOOTER F12 | HECHT 5189 |
|---|---|
What riders love
|
What riders love
|
What riders complain about
|
What riders complain about
|
Price & Value
The F12 lives in a price zone where expectations get serious. You're paying well above budget Xiaomi territory, and closer to the lower edge of "semi-serious" scooters. For that, you get big wheels, a 48-volt system, dual disc brakes and a front fork - all rare to see combined in this price envelope. But you also don't get standout range, featherweight construction, or premium finishing. It's not a bad deal, but it doesn't scream bargain either, especially once you factor in occasional quality-control quirks.
The HECHT tends to land in a slightly more forgiving price bracket. You get similar battery size, the same big-wheel advantage, and a stronger motor, but you skip the fork and most aesthetic refinements. It feels like more of your money went into copper windings and aluminium, less into design meetings. If you're the type who values hardware over software gloss, that trade will make a lot of sense.
In long-term value terms, the HECHT's simpler architecture and stronger motor give it a mild edge: fewer moving parts to service, more power in reserve as the battery ages. The F12 still offers a unique comfort package, but at a price that pushes it into direct competition with scooters that either go further, go faster, or feel more premium in the flesh.
Service & Parts Availability
FUNSCOOTER / Freego operate very much in the OEM world, with distribution depending heavily on regional resellers. That's a double-edged sword: the scooter itself is mechanically straightforward, so basic parts (brake pads, inner tubes, tyres, generic controllers) are easy to source, but branded parts and warranty experience vary a lot depending on where you bought it. Some riders report smooth support, others end up in email ping-pong.
HECHT, on the other hand, is an established hardware brand with brick-and-mortar presence in Central and Eastern Europe. They already have service networks for their garden tools, and the scooter side benefits from that. You're more likely to have an actual service centre to talk to if something major fails. The flip side: scooter-specific parts can still be less readily stocked than, say, Xiaomi spares, so you might be waiting for a shipment rather than grabbing everything from the nearest online megastore.
Overall, if I had to bet on which one is easier to get looked at in a few years' time at a random regional service point, my money would quietly go on the HECHT.
Pros & Cons Summary
| FUNSCOOTER F12 | HECHT 5189 |
|---|---|
Pros
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
Cons
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | FUNSCOOTER F12 | HECHT 5189 |
|---|---|---|
| Motor power (rated) | 350 W | 400 W |
| Top speed | 25 km/h (limited) | 25 km/h (limited) |
| Claimed range | 35 km | 30 km |
| Realistic range (est.) | 22-28 km | 18-22 km |
| Battery | 360 Wh (48 V system) | 360 Wh (36 V / 10 Ah) |
| Weight | 18,5 kg | 18,5 kg |
| Brakes | Front & rear mechanical discs | Disc brakes (configuration varies by batch) |
| Suspension | Front mechanical fork | None (pneumatic tyres only) |
| Tyres | 12" pneumatic | 12" pneumatic |
| Max rider load | 120 kg | 100 kg |
| Water resistance | IP54 | Not specified / basic splash resistance |
| Charging time | 6 h | 5-6 h |
| Typical street price | 809 € | Approx. mid-range budget level |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
Both scooters deliver on the core promise of big-wheel stability, and both are a massive step up in confidence versus the usual rental-style toys. But when you look at the full picture - performance, price, simplicity and long-term ownership - the HECHT 5189 comes out as the more convincing package for most riders.
The F12 wins on out-of-the-box comfort: that front fork and wide deck do make bad surfaces and long rides feel easier, and the higher rider weight limit is a real, practical advantage if you're carrying more kilos or lots of gear. If you're particularly sensitive to impacts, or you ride long stretches of broken tarmac every day, its extra plushness might justify the steeper price.
The HECHT, however, gives you stronger propulsion, a cleaner design with fewer things to rattle or fail, and a better price-to-hardware ratio. It doesn't pamper you quite as much on the nastiest surfaces, but it also doesn't pretend to be more than it is: a solid, slightly heavy, very stable city tool that just gets the job done. For the majority of pragmatic commuters who want reliable big-wheel comfort without overpaying for middling refinement, the HECHT 5189 is the one I'd quietly recommend.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | FUNSCOOTER F12 | HECHT 5189 |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ❌ 2,25 €/Wh | ✅ 1,67 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ❌ 32,36 €/km/h | ✅ 24,00 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ✅ 51,39 g/Wh | ✅ 51,39 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | ✅ 0,74 kg/km/h | ✅ 0,74 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ❌ 32,36 €/km | ✅ 30,00 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ✅ 0,74 kg/km | ❌ 0,93 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ✅ 14,40 Wh/km | ❌ 18,00 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ❌ 14 W/km/h | ✅ 16 W/km/h |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | ❌ 0,0529 kg/W | ✅ 0,0463 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ❌ 60 W | ✅ 65,45 W |
These metrics strip the scooters down to pure maths. Price per Wh and per km/h tell you how much "energy storage" and "speed capability" you get for your money. Weight-related ratios reveal how efficiently they turn mass into performance and range. Wh per km shows real-world energy efficiency. Power-to-speed and weight-to-power reflect how strongly each scooter is geared towards performance. Average charging speed simply indicates how quickly the battery fills relative to its size.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | FUNSCOOTER F12 | HECHT 5189 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ✅ Same, but better range | ✅ Same, more power |
| Range | ✅ Slightly longer real range | ❌ Shorter under same use |
| Max Speed | ✅ Legal limit, equal | ✅ Legal limit, equal |
| Power | ❌ Weaker motor feel | ✅ Noticeably stronger pull |
| Battery Size | ✅ Same, better efficiency | ✅ Same, more punch |
| Suspension | ✅ Front fork softens hits | ❌ Tyres only, harsher |
| Design | ✅ More refined, commuter-ish | ❌ Plain, industrial look |
| Safety | ✅ Dual discs, stable, lit | ❌ Lighting, braking less polished |
| Practicality | ❌ Bulky, pricey for errands | ✅ Better value, same bulk |
| Comfort | ✅ Softer, less fatigue | ❌ Harsher on bad roads |
| Features | ✅ Fork, dual discs, display | ❌ Plainer feature set |
| Serviceability | ❌ OEM, dealer-dependent | ✅ Established service network |
| Customer Support | ❌ Varies with reseller | ✅ Stronger brand backing |
| Fun Factor | ✅ Cushy, relaxed cruising | ✅ Punchier motor, lively |
| Build Quality | ❌ QC niggles, fiddly bits | ✅ Simple, sturdy assembly |
| Component Quality | ❌ Decent, not standout | ❌ Similar mid-range parts |
| Brand Name | ❌ Smaller, OEM-style brand | ✅ Known machinery maker |
| Community | ✅ Niche but vocal fans | ✅ Solid user base regionally |
| Lights (visibility) | ✅ Stronger overall package | ❌ Adequate but weaker |
| Lights (illumination) | ✅ Better road lighting | ❌ Often needs extra light |
| Acceleration | ❌ Softer, more modest | ✅ Stronger shove off line |
| Arrive with smile factor | ✅ Comfort-driven, relaxing | ✅ Punchy, stable fun |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ✅ Less vibration, more cush | ❌ More road feedback |
| Charging speed | ❌ Slightly slower to fill | ✅ Marginally quicker charge |
| Reliability | ❌ QC issues crop up | ✅ Simple, fewer weak points |
| Folded practicality | ❌ Bulky, so-so to carry | ❌ Same bulk, same pain |
| Ease of transport | ❌ Heavy, stair-unfriendly | ❌ Equally heavy, awkward |
| Handling | ✅ Softer, forgiving steering | ✅ Firmer, precise tracking |
| Braking performance | ✅ Dual discs, strong feel | ❌ Good but less assured |
| Riding position | ✅ Wide deck, relaxed stance | ❌ Less deck freedom |
| Handlebar quality | ✅ Better grips, integration | ❌ More basic cockpit |
| Throttle response | ✅ Smooth, beginner-friendly | ✅ Stronger, still controllable |
| Dashboard/Display | ✅ Clear, nicely integrated | ❌ Very basic interface |
| Security (locking) | ❌ No special provisions | ❌ Same, standard only |
| Weather protection | ✅ IP54 rating specified | ❌ Less clearly specified |
| Resale value | ❌ Niche, pricey used | ✅ Known brand helps resale |
| Tuning potential | ✅ 48 V, mod-friendly base | ❌ Less common for tuning |
| Ease of maintenance | ❌ More moving parts | ✅ Simpler, easier wrenching |
| Value for Money | ❌ Comfort, but pricey | ✅ Strong hardware per Euro |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the FUNSCOOTER F12 scores 4 points against the HECHT 5189's 8. In the Author's Category Battle, the FUNSCOOTER F12 gets 23 ✅ versus 20 ✅ for HECHT 5189 (with a few ties sprinkled in).
Totals: FUNSCOOTER F12 scores 27, HECHT 5189 scores 28.
Based on the scoring, the HECHT 5189 is our overall winner. Between these two big-wheel bruisers, the HECHT 5189 simply feels like the more honest, well-judged package - it pulls harder, asks less from your wallet, and its straightforward engineering inspires quiet confidence on every ride. The FUNSCOOTER F12 has its charms, especially if you crave maximum comfort and a gentler, more cosseting ride, but it makes you pay dearly for that extra plushness without delivering a truly standout overall experience. If I were spending my own money for daily city duty, I'd live with the HECHT's slightly firmer ride and enjoy the sense that this is a tool built to work first and impress second - and that's usually the kind of machine that keeps you smiling the longest.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.

