Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
The Xiaomi Mi Electric Scooter 3 edges out as the better overall package: it is lighter, better finished, stops more confidently, and has a stronger ecosystem of parts, guides and support behind it. It feels more refined day to day, especially if you carry it a lot or mix riding with public transport.
The GOTRAX G3 Plus makes a case for itself if you prioritise comfort and confidence over polish - its larger tyres and roomier deck give a noticeably softer ride and a more relaxed stance, especially on scruffy city streets.
Choose the Xiaomi if you want a sleek, proven, easy-to-live-with commuter; pick the GOTRAX if you mainly ride short distances, hate harsh rides, and do not care much about apps or brand prestige.
If you want to know which compromises actually matter after a few hundred kilometres, keep reading - this is where the paper specs stop lying.
Electric scooters in this class are not about bragging rights; they are about surviving Monday mornings. I have ridden both the GOTRAX G3 Plus and the Xiaomi Mi Electric Scooter 3 in exactly the places you will: cracked bike lanes, damp pavements, dodgy shortcut paths that "definitely looked smoother on Google Maps". Neither is perfect, but both are realistic daily tools rather than toys.
On one side, the GOTRAX tries to win you over with sheer comfort and simplicity: big air tyres, a long deck, no gimmicks. On the other, Xiaomi leans on its proven formula: low weight, slick design, strong brakes and an app that actually works. One is the comfy trainer; the other is the neat city shoe.
If you are hovering between these two, you are already in the sensible lane. The question now is: which flavour of sensible fits your life better? Let's break it down.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
Both scooters sit in the "serious-but-not-crazy" commuter segment: quicker and more capable than entry-level toys, but far from the heavy dual-motor tanks that need a freight elevator and a dedicated parking spot.
The GOTRAX G3 Plus is aimed at budget-conscious riders who want a comfortable, confidence-inspiring machine for relatively short hops. Think few kilometres to work, campus runs, neighbourhood errands - and streets that look like the city forgot about road maintenance a decade ago.
The Xiaomi Mi Electric Scooter 3, meanwhile, targets urban commuters who value portability and polish. If you constantly carry your scooter up stairs, jump on trains, and park it next to your desk, the Xiaomi sits right in that sweet spot between decent performance and "please don't destroy my spine" weight.
Price-wise, the Xiaomi asks a noticeable premium over the G3 Plus. You are paying extra for lighter weight, better finishing, an app ecosystem, and Xiaomi's massive parts network. The G3 Plus counters with comfort-first hardware at a much friendlier price. Same broad use case, different compromises - hence, a very fair head-to-head.
Design & Build Quality
Pick both up and the design philosophies are obvious. The GOTRAX G3 Plus feels like a utilitarian tool: matte, understated, slightly chunky. The frame is solid aluminium, the deck generous, the cockpit simple and honest. It looks like it was designed by people who commute, not by a marketing department chasing design awards.
The Xiaomi Mi 3, in contrast, is the archetypal modern e-scooter silhouette. Clean lines, tucked-away cabling, nice colour accents, and a frame that feels more "consumer electronics" than "workhorse". The aluminium chassis feels taut and well-finished, and the new folding mechanism clicks with a reassuring precision that earlier Xiaomi generations sometimes lacked.
In the hands, the Xiaomi feels more refined: less play in the stem, tighter tolerances around hinges, and better integration of components like the display and rear brake. The GOTRAX is not flimsy, but you can tell where they saved money - the latch feels a bit more budget, the finishing a touch rougher, the overall impression more "good enough" than "oh, nice".
If you prefer a scooter that disappears visually and just does its job, the G3 Plus fits that role. If you care about something that looks sharp in an office lobby and feels more premium out of the box, the Xiaomi clearly has the upper hand.
Ride Comfort & Handling
This is where the GOTRAX G3 Plus suddenly starts throwing punches above its price. Those big ten-inch air tyres make a very real difference. On broken pavements, patchy asphalt and the usual city scars, the G3 Plus glides noticeably softer. After several kilometres on mixed surfaces, my knees and wrists were still on speaking terms, which is not always guaranteed in this price range.
The long, wide deck lets you adopt a relaxed, snowboard-like stance. You can shuffle your feet, move weight around, and generally ride like a human instead of a Tetris piece. In slow manoeuvres - weaving around pedestrians, rolling off kerbs - the scooter feels forgiving and stable. The downside is that the steering feels a bit lazier: great for straight-line comfort, less agile when you want to flick through tight gaps.
The Xiaomi Mi 3 rides very differently. With smaller tyres and no suspension, the comfort is heavily dependent on road quality. On fresh bike lanes or smooth tarmac, it feels lovely - quiet, composed, gliding. Hit cobbles or neglected concrete and it becomes noticeably harsher. You quickly learn to ride with soft knees and pick your lines carefully; longer runs on truly rough surfaces do wear you down.
Handling-wise, the Xiaomi is the more nimble of the two. The shorter, narrower deck and lighter weight make it easier to thread through tight city traffic and pull quick direction changes. It feels more responsive, but also more demanding on bad surfaces. In short: GOTRAX wins for comfort, Xiaomi for agility - and your choice depends on whether your city planners believe in maintenance.
Performance
On paper both scooters sit in the same power class, and on flat ground they feel broadly similar in outright pace. Neither is a speed demon, and both top out at what I'd call "comfortably fast for bike lanes, fast enough to annoy joggers." The GOTRAX stretches a little more at the top, but in most European cities you will be limited by regulation or common sense long before hardware.
Off the line, the Xiaomi feels slightly more eager in its sport mode, especially with a full battery. The peak output gives it a bit more punch when pulling away from lights or overtaking slower cyclists. That said, once you're rolling at a steady cruise, the difference is subtle rather than night-and-day.
Hill performance is a nuanced story. On gentle inclines, both chug along without drama for average-weight riders. As the slope steepens, the Xiaomi's extra peak shove becomes more noticeable - it simply hangs on to speed better, especially with the battery still healthy. The GOTRAX does better than many cheap commuters, but will slow more obviously on longer climbs and with heavier riders.
Braking is where Xiaomi pulls well ahead. The dual-pad rear disc and refined electronic front brake give a very controlled, progressive stop. You can brake hard without drama, with good feel at the lever. The G3 Plus's combination of rear disc and front electronic braking is absolutely acceptable for its speed and class, but the lever feel is a bit more vague and the overall system less confidence-inspiring in emergency stops, especially on wet surfaces.
If your commute is mostly flat and civilised, either scooter will feel adequate. If you live somewhere with real hills and chaotic traffic where you actually need your brakes, the Mi 3 inspires more trust.
Battery & Range
Here is the unvarnished truth: both scooters promise more on paper than they deliver in the real world. Welcome to the industry. The GOTRAX, with its smaller battery, feels like a "short-hop specialist". Treat it as a comfortable fifteenish kilometre machine under typical conditions, and life is fine. Start expecting the optimistic claimed distance at full speed, and you will eventually be pushing it home and reconsidering your life choices.
The Xiaomi ships with a larger battery and is simply the more capable distance machine. In brisk, real-world commuting - sport mode, urban stop-and-go, a human-sized rider - you can usually squeeze a few kilometres more out of it than the GOTRAX before range anxiety kicks in. It is still not a touring scooter, but it is more forgiving if your "quick trip" turns into a detour via the supermarket, then a friend's place, then back.
Both take roughly an evening to refill from empty. Plug either in when you get home, and by morning you are good. The Xiaomi's battery management is more sophisticated, with better long-term health protections and tweakable regenerative braking via the app. The GOTRAX keeps things basic: it just charges and goes.
Practically: if your whole daily round trip is under a dozen kilometres and you can charge at one end, either works. If you are forever "just adding one more stop", the Xiaomi's extra buffer and smarter battery care are worth the premium.
Portability & Practicality
Portability is where Xiaomi plays its trump card. The Mi 3 is significantly lighter, and you feel every missing kilo the first time you carry it up a staircase or onto a bus. Folded, it is compact enough to slide under desks and into small boots without a wrestling match. The latch is quick, the bell-to-mudguard hook is simple and secure, and the whole process from riding to carrying takes seconds.
The GOTRAX G3 Plus is still manageable, but you are in a different league. Carrying it up one flight is fine; several flights every day, and you start rethinking your choices. The folded package is a bit bulkier, and the mechanism, while functional, feels more agricultural. It locks to the rear fender and doubles as a bag hook when upright, which is a clever touch, but it is not a scooter you joyfully carry around half the time - it's one you mostly want to roll.
For pure "last kilometre from the station" use, the Xiaomi is clearly more practical. For people who mostly ride door-to-door, with only occasional lifting - into a car, up a short stairwell - the weight penalty of the G3 Plus is tolerable, especially given its comfort advantage.
Safety
Starting with braking, because that is the bit that really matters: Xiaomi has done its homework. The combination of front electronic braking and a redesigned dual-pad mechanical rear system gives progressive, reassuring stops. In emergency braking tests on dry and slightly damp surfaces, the Mi 3 consistently felt poised and controllable. It lets you scrub speed hard without instant wheel lock or drama.
The GOTRAX's brakes are adequate for its speed and usage, but not stellar. The electronic front assist plus rear disc will bring you to a stop in a sane distance, yet lever feel and modulation are a step down from the Xiaomi. New riders will still feel safe enough, but seasoned ones will notice the difference - especially in busy traffic or wet conditions.
In terms of tyres and grip, the G3 Plus claws back some ground. Those larger air tyres offer a more generous contact patch and soak up small imperfections, which translates into better composure mid-corner and more confidence on rough or damp tarmac. The Xiaomi's smaller tyres are fine on clean surfaces but skip around more on broken ground and pothole lips.
Lighting and visibility: the Mi 3 wins. Its front lamp, brighter rear light and extensive reflectors give good presence in traffic. You are visually "louder" at night or in winter gloom. The GOTRAX's lighting is serviceable - cars will see you, and you can see enough in lit city streets - but for truly dark paths I would absolutely add a secondary front light on both, and especially on the GOTRAX.
Stability at speed is a mixed picture. The GOTRAX's larger tyres and longer wheelbase feel planted in a straight line but can be let down by a folding joint that tends to develop a little play if ignored. The Xiaomi's stiffer, more tightly engineered stem feels better made, even though the shorter wheelbase and smaller tyres are less forgiving on bad surfaces. As long as you mind your terrain, the Xiaomi gives the more precise feeling of control; as soon as the road gets ugly, the GOTRAX's soft-riding rubber makes you feel safer.
Community Feedback
| GOTRAX G3 Plus | Xiaomi Mi Electric Scooter 3 |
|---|---|
What riders love
|
What riders love
|
What riders complain about
|
What riders complain about
|
Price & Value
On sticker price alone, the GOTRAX G3 Plus is the friendlier option. You are getting a capable commuter for noticeably less than the Mi 3, and for many riders that gap represents actual money, not just a rounding error. For short, predictable commutes on rougher streets, the comfort per euro is genuinely impressive.
The Xiaomi, by contrast, sits in that slightly awkward bracket where it is not "cheap" but not quite premium either. What you are really buying is ecosystem and refinement: better brakes, lower weight, more range, a very robust supply of spare parts, and an app that adds practical convenience. Over several years of ownership, that package can easily justify the upfront difference - especially if you depend on the scooter daily.
If your budget is tight and your expectations realistic, the G3 Plus does not feel like a bad buy at all. If you can stretch, the Mi 3 is the more complete product and will likely age more gracefully in heavy use.
Service & Parts Availability
This category is brutally simple: Xiaomi dominates. The Mi 3 is part of a gigantic family tree going back to the original M365, and that means parts are everywhere - from online marketplaces to local bike shops that now know these scooters better than some bicycles. Tyres, tubes, fenders, controllers, third-party upgrades: you name it, it exists.
GOTRAX is popular, especially in North America, and support has improved over the years. You can get basic parts and they do honour warranties more consistently than in the early days. Still, outside their core markets you are much more dependent on shipping, brand-direct communication, and community hacks. For the average European rider, Xiaomi is simply easier to keep on the road.
If you like tinkering, modding, and knowing that almost any broken part can be sorted with a YouTube video and a few clicks, the Xiaomi ecosystem is a major plus. The GOTRAX is serviceable, just not to the same degree.
Pros & Cons Summary
| GOTRAX G3 Plus | Xiaomi Mi Electric Scooter 3 |
|---|---|
Pros
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
Cons
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | GOTRAX G3 Plus | Xiaomi Mi Electric Scooter 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Motor power (rated) | 300 W (front hub) | 300 W (front hub, 600 W peak) |
| Top speed | ca. 29 km/h | 25 km/h |
| Battery capacity | 216 Wh (36 V, 6,0 Ah) | 275 Wh |
| Claimed range | 29 km | 30 km |
| Realistic range (est.) | 15-20 km | 18-22 km |
| Weight | 16 kg | 13,2 kg |
| Brakes | Front electronic + rear disc | Front E-ABS + rear dual-pad disc |
| Suspension | None (relies on tyres) | None (rigid frame) |
| Tyres | 10-inch pneumatic | 8,5-inch pneumatic |
| Max load | 100 kg | 100 kg |
| Water resistance | IPX5 | IP54 |
| Approx. price | ca. 364 € | ca. 462 € |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
After living with both, the Xiaomi Mi Electric Scooter 3 comes out as the more rounded commuter. It is easier to carry, better to stop, slightly stronger on range, and far better supported in terms of parts and know-how. It feels like a mature product from a company that has iterated this formula several times and ironed out most of the silly flaws.
The GOTRAX G3 Plus is not outclassed so much as narrowly specialised. It gives you genuinely impressive ride comfort and a relaxed stance for the money, at the cost of range, refinement and portability. If your daily rides are short, your roads are rough, and your stairs are few, it can still be the more pleasant companion - provided you go in with sensible expectations about range and accept the slightly budget feel.
If I had to put one of these in the hands of an average European city commuter who depends on it every day, it would be the Xiaomi. If I were choosing something cheap and cheerful for shorter, bumpy urban hops where comfort matters more than polish, the GOTRAX would still earn a second look.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | GOTRAX G3 Plus | Xiaomi Mi Electric Scooter 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ❌ 1,69 €/Wh | ✅ 1,68 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ✅ 12,55 €/km/h | ❌ 18,48 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ❌ 74,07 g/Wh | ✅ 48,00 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | ❌ 0,55 kg/km/h | ✅ 0,53 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ✅ 20,80 €/km | ❌ 23,10 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ❌ 0,91 kg/km | ✅ 0,66 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ✅ 12,34 Wh/km | ❌ 13,75 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ❌ 10,34 W/km/h | ✅ 12,00 W/km/h |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | ❌ 0,053 kg/W | ✅ 0,044 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ❌ 43,20 W | ✅ 50,00 W |
These metrics strip away feelings and look only at maths. Price-per-Wh and price-per-km/h tell you how much "energy tank" and speed you get for your money. Weight-based metrics show how portable each Wh, km/h or kilometre of range effectively is. Wh per km indicates pure efficiency: how gently each scooter sips its battery. Power-to-speed and weight-to-power hint at how strongly a scooter accelerates relative to its top speed and mass, while charging speed tells you how quickly you can refill the battery in practice.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | GOTRAX G3 Plus | Xiaomi Mi Electric Scooter 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ❌ Noticeably heavier to carry | ✅ Light, easy one-hand carry |
| Range | ❌ Shorter comfortable daily distance | ✅ Goes a bit further realistically |
| Max Speed | ✅ Slightly higher top pace | ❌ Slower but regulation-friendly |
| Power | ❌ Adequate but nothing extra | ✅ Stronger peak shove, hills |
| Battery Size | ❌ Smaller energy tank | ✅ Larger, more forgiving pack |
| Suspension | ✅ Tyres mimic basic suspension | ❌ Harsher rigid setup |
| Design | ❌ Functional, slightly plain look | ✅ Sleek, award-style aesthetic |
| Safety | ❌ Brakes okay, not stellar | ✅ Strong brakes, great visibility |
| Practicality | ❌ Less portable, shorter range | ✅ Easy to carry, good balance |
| Comfort | ✅ Softer, more forgiving ride | ❌ Harsher on bad surfaces |
| Features | ❌ Very basic, no app | ✅ App, KERS tuning, lock |
| Serviceability | ❌ Parts less universally available | ✅ Huge parts, guide ecosystem |
| Customer Support | ❌ Improving but inconsistent | ✅ Mature, widely supported |
| Fun Factor | ✅ Floaty, relaxed cruiser feel | ❌ Competent but less character |
| Build Quality | ❌ Feels more budget overall | ✅ Tighter, more solid feel |
| Component Quality | ❌ Serviceable but unremarkable | ✅ Better brakes, better details |
| Brand Name | ❌ Smaller presence in EU | ✅ Household micromobility name |
| Community | ❌ Smaller, less mod-heavy | ✅ Massive, very active community |
| Lights (visibility) | ❌ Basic lights, fewer reflectors | ✅ Strong rear, reflectors everywhere |
| Lights (illumination) | ❌ Adequate but modest beam | ✅ Slightly better real-world throw |
| Acceleration | ❌ Smooth but modest pull | ✅ Sharper, livelier in Sport |
| Arrive with smile factor | ✅ Cushy tyres, relaxed stance | ❌ Competent, a bit clinical |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ✅ Less fatigue on rough roads | ❌ Rough surfaces tire you quicker |
| Charging speed | ❌ Slower for its small battery | ✅ Slightly faster relative refill |
| Reliability | ❌ Fine, but fewer data points | ✅ Proven track record globally |
| Folded practicality | ❌ Bulkier footprint folded | ✅ Compact, easy to stash |
| Ease of transport | ❌ Heavier, awkward on stairs | ✅ Comfortable to lug around |
| Handling | ❌ Stable but a bit sluggish | ✅ Nimble, easy to thread |
| Braking performance | ❌ Acceptable but less refined | ✅ Strong, modulated, reassuring |
| Riding position | ✅ Long, roomy deck stance | ❌ Narrower, more constrained deck |
| Handlebar quality | ❌ Basic controls, average feel | ✅ Better integration, nicer feel |
| Throttle response | ❌ Gentle but slightly dull | ✅ Crisper, better tuned curve |
| Dashboard/Display | ❌ Simple, functional, nothing more | ✅ Clear, modern integrated dash |
| Security (locking) | ❌ Basic digital lock only | ✅ App lock plus basic options |
| Weather protection | ✅ Slightly better rating | ❌ More cautious in heavy rain |
| Resale value | ❌ Lower demand used market | ✅ Strong second-hand interest |
| Tuning potential | ❌ Few mods, smaller ecosystem | ✅ Huge modding scene available |
| Ease of maintenance | ❌ Fewer guides, less standardised | ✅ Tons of tutorials, parts |
| Value for Money | ✅ Very strong comfort per euro | ❌ Fair, but pricier overall |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the GOTRAX G3 Plus scores 3 points against the XIAOMI Mi Electric Scooter 3's 7. In the Author's Category Battle, the GOTRAX G3 Plus gets 9 ✅ versus 30 ✅ for XIAOMI Mi Electric Scooter 3.
Totals: GOTRAX G3 Plus scores 12, XIAOMI Mi Electric Scooter 3 scores 37.
Based on the scoring, the XIAOMI Mi Electric Scooter 3 is our overall winner. Both scooters have their charms, but the Xiaomi Mi Electric Scooter 3 simply feels like the better thought-through companion for everyday city life. It is easier to live with, more confidence-inspiring in traffic, and backed by a support network that quietly removes a lot of long-term headaches. The GOTRAX G3 Plus answers back with a softer ride and a kinder price tag, and for short, rough-road commutes that combination can be genuinely appealing. If you want something that just works, day in, day out, with the least drama, the Xiaomi is the one that will more often leave you thinking, "that was easy" rather than "that was cheap".
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.

