Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
The Hiboy KS4 Pro is the more capable overall scooter, mainly thanks to its stronger motor and bigger battery, which make daily commuting less stressful and give you more headroom for longer trips or lazy-throttle days. It pulls better on hills, copes more confidently with heavier riders, and simply feels like it has more in reserve.
The Hiboy S2 SE fights back with a lower price and a rear air tyre that makes short urban hops more comfortable than you'd expect at this budget, but its smaller battery and weaker motor mean you always feel a bit closer to the limit. Choose the S2 SE if you're on a tight budget, your rides are genuinely short, and you value comfort over power.
If you want a scooter that will still feel "enough" a year from now instead of "just barely", the KS4 Pro is the safer bet. Stick around and we'll go deep into how they really compare when the tarmac gets ugly and the battery bar starts lying to you.
Both of these Hiboys live in the same neighbourhood: budget commuters that promise "grown-up" usefulness without the scary price tag. On paper they look like siblings; on the road they feel more like cousins who made different life choices. One went to the gym, the other learnt to live on less.
I've put proper city kilometres on both: early-morning commutes on wet bike lanes, cracked pavements, and those charming European cobbles that were clearly not designed with small solid tyres in mind. Along the way, each scooter showed very clearly who it's for - and where Hiboy saved a bit too enthusiastically on the bill of materials.
If you're trying to decide which one should live in your hallway, let's break down the trade-offs so you don't end up regretting your "bargain".
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
These two are direct competitors in the same budget-commuter arena, priced well below the premium names but trying very hard to deliver a "real vehicle" feel rather than toy vibes. Both target riders who do modest daily distances, mostly on tarmac, and want to avoid fiddling with punctured tyres or complicated maintenance.
The KS4 Pro is the "slightly serious" one: more motor, more battery, marginally more heft. It's aimed at riders who regularly do medium-length commutes, may face a few hills, or simply don't want to babysit battery percentage every other day.
The S2 SE is the cost-cutting charmer: lighter motor, smaller battery, but cheaper and with a clever tyre setup that tries to add comfort where people actually feel it. It's tuned for short city hops and students or office workers whose idea of a long ride is crossing campus or going two districts over.
They sit so close in size and weight that most people will cross-shop them. Same brand, similar silhouettes, same app ecosystem - but those design choices make them behave quite differently on the road.
Design & Build Quality
Pick them up and the first thing you notice is material character. The KS4 Pro goes with the usual aluminium-alloy commuter formula. It feels reasonably solid, a bit hollow in the stem, and familiar if you've ever ridden a Xiaomi-style scooter. The finish is decent, cables are mostly tucked away, and the central display looks more modern than the price suggests, even if the plastics don't scream "premium".
The S2 SE, by contrast, uses a steel frame. In the hands it feels denser and more "forged", like a small urban tool rather than hollow tubing. On the road that translates into fewer creaks and a slightly more planted feel over time, though if you manage to rust a scooter, steel is obviously more susceptible than alloy. Cable routing is roughly on par with the KS4 Pro - mostly tidy, with just enough visible wiring to remind you this is still a budget machine.
Both folding mechanisms are quick, stem-to-rear-fender latch systems with a fairly reassuring click when locked. In practice they're similar, but the S2 SE's hinge feels a notch tighter out of the box, while the KS4 Pro can develop that faint "is it or isn't it?" micro-play if you don't give it the occasional Allen-key love Hiboy scooters tend to require. Neither feels dangerous; both feel very... cost-optimised.
Ergonomically, both cockpits are simple: thumb throttle, one brake lever, central display. The KS4 Pro's deck rubber has a slightly more reassuring texture, the S2 SE's deck is a touch wider and more forgiving for larger feet. If you value frame "solidity" in the hand, the S2 SE edges it; if you prefer the lighter, more typical aluminium feel, the KS4 Pro is fine. Neither will blow you away with craftsmanship, but both are far from the worst of the bargain-bin crowd.
Ride Comfort & Handling
This is where they really diverge. Imagine the KS4 Pro as the scooter that tries to fix harsh solid tyres with a token bit of suspension, and the S2 SE as the scooter that tries to fix budget suspension by simply not having any and relying on air in the tyre instead.
The KS4 Pro runs two solid honeycomb tyres and a single rear shock. On smooth asphalt, the ride is pleasantly calm and directionally stable; the larger wheel size helps, and you can cruise at top speed without white-knuckling the bars. Once the surface gets patched, cracked or cobbled, you're reminded very quickly that "solid" really means solid. The rear shock does help with bigger hits - kerb drops, expansion joints - but high-frequency buzz still finds its way to your knees and wrists. After a few kilometres of rough city sidewalk, you start thinking about padded gloves and bending your legs more than your dignity likes.
The S2 SE flips the script: solid front, air-filled rear. That means the front still sends a clear and sometimes rude telegram up to your hands whenever you hit a sharp edge. But because most of your weight sits over the rear, the pneumatic tyre there does a much better job soaking up the worst of the chatter your legs would otherwise endure. Over gnarly pavement, the rear of the S2 SE feels noticeably friendlier than the KS4 Pro; the front, not so much. It's a "half-comfort" setup that, for short trips, works surprisingly well.
In corners, both are predictable rather than exciting. The KS4 Pro's rear motor gives a nice, pushing feel when exiting bends, and the dual solid tyres remove any vague squirm you sometimes get from soft tubes. The S2 SE, with its rear air tyre, feels a little more compliant mid-corner, especially on imperfect tarmac, but the front end can skip if you hammer into imperfections while leaned over. Treat it like a commuter, not a race scooter, and it's absolutely fine.
Overall, for longer rides on mixed city surfaces, I'd still give a slight edge to the S2 SE's rear-tyre comfort, purely because it spares your feet and knees more. For mixed or bad surfaces over longer distances, the KS4 Pro's all-solid approach starts to feel like a bad life decision, rear shock or not.
Performance
Push the throttle on the KS4 Pro and it responds with a reassuring shove. That rear motor has clearly more muscle than the S2 SE, enough that you flow with faster bike-lane traffic rather than constantly working to keep up. Off the line it's brisk without being silly, and mid-range pull is strong enough that overtakes of slower cyclists don't feel like a long-term project. On modest hills, it keeps chugging with dignity; only on really steep ramps or with heavier riders does it drop into "please be patient" mode, but it rarely feels completely out of its depth.
The S2 SE, by comparison, is more honest about being a budget commuter. It gets going adequately and hits its top-speed comfort zone eventually, but there's less in reserve. For light to average riders on flat ground, it's perfectly acceptable; you'll still beat most pushbikes away from the lights. Once a hill appears, though, you feel the smaller motor very clearly. Bridge climbs become more of a grind, and if you're a heavier rider you'll be watching your speed number droop while the motor hums its heart out.
Braking is one of the more interesting contrasts. The KS4 Pro combines rear mechanical disc with front electronic braking. When properly adjusted, the disc has decent bite and modulation, backed up by the regen on the front motor. It will bring you down from top speed in a confident, controlled way, though like most budget discs it likes a bit of fiddling and bed-in time to stop squeaking.
The S2 SE uses rear drum plus electronic front regen. On paper that sounds cheaper; in real life, it's pleasantly effective for a commuter. Drum brakes are nearly maintenance-free and work consistently in wet conditions, and the regen adds a gentle initial slowdown when you tap the lever or the e-brake. You don't get the sharp initial grab of a good disc, but you also don't get a rotor to bend or misalign. For city use, the S2 SE's brakes feel slightly more "fit-and-forget", the KS4 Pro's slightly stronger when you've kept them in good order.
In pure riding experience, the KS4 Pro is the more relaxed performer. You're far less often at the edge of its ability. The S2 SE can do most of what commuters need, but you feel more frequently like you're asking a lot from a small motor and battery. If you have any hills, extra weight, or just like brisk acceleration, the KS4 Pro wins this round.
Battery & Range
Both scooters suffer from the same disease as every other scooter: optimistic marketing. The KS4 Pro carries a noticeably larger battery, and you feel that in real-world use. Commuting at full power with a mix of flats and mild hills, I generally finished rides on the KS4 Pro with a comforting chunk of charge still in the tank. On more conservative eco-mode runs, it's entirely feasible to stretch it over multiple days of commuting before the charger becomes urgent.
With the S2 SE, the story is different. Its smaller pack means that riding at top speed quickly eats into your indicated range. For short hops - say, a few kilometres each way - it's absolutely fine and you'll charge every couple of days without drama. Start pushing into double-digit round trips with hills and full-power riding, and you'll watch the final battery bar vanish much faster than the first. The last stretch of charge feels more like "reserve fuel" than comfortable cruising.
Charging times are broadly similar; both are easy to top up during a workday or overnight. The KS4 Pro, however, gives you more kilometres back for each charging session. In practical daily use, that translates into less range anxiety and fewer mental calculations before detours. If you're the type who hates seeing low battery warnings - on any device - the KS4 Pro's extra capacity is worth its weight.
Portability & Practicality
On paper, their weights are close enough that you wouldn't think it matters. In the real world, both land squarely in the "you can carry it up a flight or two of stairs, but don't make a hobby of it" category. Dragging either up to a fourth-floor walk-up every day will turn your commute into cross-training.
Folding is quick on both, and both latch to the rear mudguard to form a single carryable unit. The S2 SE sits fractionally more compact when folded, helped by its stout steel frame geometry; it tucks under desks and behind doors in small flats quite nicely. The KS4 Pro isn't exactly bulky either, but its frame feels that bit more stretched, and in cramped trains or buses you'll be more aware of it.
Multi-modal commuting - ride, fold, train, unfold - is solid with both. If I had to sprint for a bus while folding one of them, I'd probably prefer to be holding the S2 SE, if only because its hinge feels that bit more confidence-inspiring and the slightly shorter folded profile bumps into fewer shins and doorways.
As a daily living object - being wheeled through lobbies, stored in hallways, moved around the office - they're functionally tied. If you know you'll be doing more carrying than riding, you're arguably shopping in the wrong category altogether.
Safety
Safety on these scooters is a mixture of brakes, lighting, stability and tyres. Both do surprisingly well for their price class, but again, with different emphases.
The KS4 Pro's larger solids and rear suspension give it a secure feel at its top speed. There's little drama; it tracks straight and feels predictable under hard braking if you're on reasonable surfaces. The dual brake system works well when correctly adjusted, and the lighting package - front headlight, tail light with brake flash, and side illumination - makes you nicely visible at night. Never having to worry about sudden air loss in the tyres removes one major potential disaster scenario.
The S2 SE matches that lighting confidence, with similarly visible head, tail and side lights. Its 10-inch wheels and grippy deck surface also inspire trust. The front solid and rear pneumatic combo, however, does mean your front end is more likely to skip if you hammer through nasty potholes; effective, but it rewards attentive riding. On wet roads, the rear drum brake is a quiet hero - enclosed and unbothered by spray, it just works, whereas cheap discs can occasionally surprise you with inconsistency in bad weather.
Both share the same modest water-resistance rating, good enough for wet roads and light rain, not for monsoons or stream crossings. If you get caught in a drizzle, either scooter will probably be fine; if you're planning a winter commuter in a very rainy city, you're pushing beyond what these were truly designed for.
Overall, neither is a death trap, which is more than can be said for some ultra-cheap imports. I'd give a slight nod to the KS4 Pro at its limit - it feels calmer when you're braking from higher speed or dodging traffic. The S2 SE feels safer in that its brakes need less pampering and its rear end has better mechanical grip, but the front-end harshness keeps you a little more on your toes.
Community Feedback
| HIBOY KS4 Pro | HIBOY S2 SE |
|---|---|
What riders love
|
What riders love
|
What riders complain about
|
What riders complain about
|
Price & Value
Both of these scooters live in the "smart people who don't want to overpay" segment, but they occupy different points on that slope. The S2 SE undercuts the KS4 Pro noticeably on price, and for that you get a scooter that will happily do short commutes, offers meaningful comfort upgrades over full-solid-tyre rivals, and doesn't feel like a disposable toy. On a strict budget, it's easy to see why it's so popular.
The KS4 Pro costs more, but not dramatically more, and gives you a larger battery and more motor wattage - two things you invariably wish you had more of once the novelty wears off. If you plan to rely on this scooter as your primary daily transport rather than just a campus shuttle, that extra spend quietly pays you back in lower stress and fewer "I really hope it makes it home" moments.
Neither feels like a bargain that defies physics; you can spot where Hiboy saved money on both. But if you're looking at years rather than months of use, the KS4 Pro generally offers the stronger long-term value as a main commuter, while the S2 SE is the classic "good enough and cheap enough" option for lighter duty.
Service & Parts Availability
One advantage of staying within the Hiboy family is ecosystem. Both of these scooters benefit from wide parts availability and a brand that, while far from perfect, is noticeably more responsive than truly generic import labels.
In Europe, you can find brakes, tyres, controllers and chargers for both models without going on a weeks-long parts safari. Hiboy's support reputation is "better than expected for the price", which sounds like faint praise but is genuinely important in this category. Owners report getting replacement parts shipped under warranty and fairly straightforward email support, especially in the first year.
The KS4 Pro's more common layout (rear motor, disc brake, standard solid tyres) also means compatible aftermarket parts are easy to source if you're handy. The S2 SE's mixed-tyre setup and drum brake are slightly more niche, but still firmly within Hiboy's standard catalogue. In both cases, basic DIY maintenance is manageable; if you can use Allen keys and Google, you're fine.
Pros & Cons Summary
| HIBOY KS4 Pro | HIBOY S2 SE |
|---|---|
Pros
|
Pros
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | HIBOY KS4 Pro | HIBOY S2 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Motor power (rated) | 500 W (rear hub) | 350 W (front hub) |
| Top speed | ca. 30 km/h | ca. 30,6 km/h |
| Claimed range | up to 40 km | ca. 27,3 km |
| Realistic range (mixed use) | ca. 25-30 km | ca. 15-18 km |
| Battery | 36 V 11,6 Ah (417 Wh) | 36 V 7,8 Ah (ca. 281 Wh) |
| Weight | 17,5 kg | 17,1 kg |
| Brakes | Front electronic + rear disc | Front electronic + rear drum |
| Suspension | Rear shock absorber | No springs, tyre-based comfort |
| Tyres | 10" honeycomb solid (front & rear) | 10" solid front, pneumatic rear |
| Max load | 100 kg | 100 kg |
| IP rating | IPX4 | IPX4 |
| Typical street price | ca. 355 € | ca. 272 € |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
If we strip away the marketing gloss and look at months of use rather than the first week of excitement, the KS4 Pro emerges as the more complete commuter. The extra motor grunt and battery capacity make everyday riding calmer and more flexible. You can take detours, tackle mild hills, and carry a bit more weight without constantly feeling like you're at the limit of what the scooter can sensibly do.
The S2 SE is easier on your wallet and kinder to your legs over short distances thanks to that rear pneumatic tyre. For students, light riders, and anyone whose daily loop is firmly under the ten-kilometre mark with modest terrain, it's a sensible, low-cost entry into electric commuting. You just have to accept that you're buying into a narrower performance envelope.
If you see your scooter as your main urban transport tool - something you'll push close to its range several times a week - the KS4 Pro is the safer and less frustrating choice, even if its all-solid-tyre harshness never quite lets you forget what you paid. If, on the other hand, you're squeezing every euro, your rides are short, and a bit of front-end chatter won't ruin your day, the S2 SE still makes a strong case as the "good enough" workhorse that doesn't financially sting if it gets stolen.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | HIBOY KS4 Pro | HIBOY S2 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ✅ 0,85 €/Wh | ❌ 0,97 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ❌ 11,83 €/km/h | ✅ 8,89 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ✅ 41,97 g/Wh | ❌ 60,91 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | ❌ 0,58 kg/km/h | ✅ 0,56 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ✅ 12,91 €/km | ❌ 16,48 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ✅ 0,64 kg/km | ❌ 1,04 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ✅ 15,16 Wh/km | ❌ 17,02 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ✅ 16,67 W/km/h | ❌ 11,44 W/km/h |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | ✅ 0,035 kg/W | ❌ 0,049 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ✅ 69,5 W | ❌ 51,1 W |
These metrics strip the scooters down to pure maths: how much battery and speed you get for your money, how efficiently they turn energy into distance, how heavy they are relative to their power and range, and how quickly they refuel. Lower "per Wh" and "per km" numbers mean better value or efficiency, while higher power-per-speed and charging wattage show which scooter has more performance per unit of capability and charges more aggressively.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | HIBOY KS4 Pro | HIBOY S2 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ❌ Slightly heavier to lug | ✅ Marginally lighter feel |
| Range | ✅ Comfortable daily distance | ❌ Shorter, more planning |
| Max Speed | ❌ Practically same, pricier | ✅ Same speed, cheaper |
| Power | ✅ Noticeably stronger motor | ❌ Runs out on hills |
| Battery Size | ✅ Bigger, more usable | ❌ Small pack, limited |
| Suspension | ✅ Rear shock adds cushion | ❌ No springs, tyre-only |
| Design | ❌ More generic commuter look | ✅ Chunky, planted aesthetics |
| Safety | ✅ Calmer at higher speed | ❌ Front harsh, less margin |
| Practicality | ✅ Better for longer duties | ❌ Best only for short hops |
| Comfort | ❌ Two solids, still harsh | ✅ Rear air saves your feet |
| Features | ✅ Suspension, solids, app | ❌ Fewer "extras" overall |
| Serviceability | ✅ Common layout, easy parts | ❌ Drum, mix tyres trickier |
| Customer Support | ✅ Similar, but common issues | ✅ Similar, proven series |
| Fun Factor | ✅ Stronger shove, livelier | ❌ Adequate, never exciting |
| Build Quality | ❌ Feels more "hollow" | ✅ Steel frame feels solid |
| Component Quality | ✅ Shock, disc, solids decent | ❌ More basic running gear |
| Brand Name | ✅ Same Hiboy pedigree | ✅ Same Hiboy pedigree |
| Community | ✅ Popular, lots of feedback | ✅ Popular, much user data |
| Lights (visibility) | ✅ Bright, side lighting good | ✅ Equally solid light package |
| Lights (illumination) | ✅ Better aimed, usable | ❌ Angle complaints at night |
| Acceleration | ✅ Stronger, more confident | ❌ Gentler, feels strained |
| Arrive with smile factor | ✅ Punchy, less stress | ❌ Fine, but underpowered |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ✅ Range, power reassurance | ❌ Range, hills nag you |
| Charging speed | ✅ More Wh back per hour | ❌ Slower energy refill |
| Reliability | ✅ All-solid avoids punctures | ❌ Rear tube still vulnerable |
| Folded practicality | ❌ Slightly longer footprint | ✅ Compact, easy to stash |
| Ease of transport | ❌ Heavier, more awkward | ✅ Slightly easier carry |
| Handling | ✅ Stable at higher speeds | ❌ Front harsh, skips more |
| Braking performance | ✅ Disc bite when tuned | ❌ Longer, softer feel |
| Riding position | ✅ Comfortable deck, stance | ✅ Wide deck, ergonomic |
| Handlebar quality | ❌ More basic feel | ✅ Slightly nicer grips |
| Throttle response | ✅ Strong, linear pull | ❌ Softer, less authority |
| Dashboard/Display | ✅ Bright, informative | ✅ Clear, practical |
| Security (locking) | ✅ App lock, standard options | ✅ App lock, standard options |
| Weather protection | ✅ Same IP rating, solids | ❌ Rear tube hates standing water |
| Resale value | ✅ Stronger spec, easier resale | ❌ Weaker spec limits interest |
| Tuning potential | ✅ Common platform, mods easy | ❌ Less headroom, smaller pack |
| Ease of maintenance | ✅ No flats, disc serviceable | ❌ Rear tube changes annoying |
| Value for Money | ✅ More scooter per euro | ❌ Cheaper, but compromises |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the HIBOY KS4 Pro scores 8 points against the HIBOY S2 SE's 2. In the Author's Category Battle, the HIBOY KS4 Pro gets 31 ✅ versus 15 ✅ for HIBOY S2 SE (with a few ties sprinkled in).
Totals: HIBOY KS4 Pro scores 39, HIBOY S2 SE scores 17.
Based on the scoring, the HIBOY KS4 Pro is our overall winner. Between these two, the KS4 Pro simply feels more like a scooter you can live with day in, day out without constantly second-guessing its limits. Its extra muscle and battery headroom make every ride a little less anxious and a little more enjoyable, even if the solid-tyre harshness never fully disappears. The S2 SE is likeable and honest, and for short, flat commutes on a tight budget it will absolutely do the job - but it always feels one size smaller than you wish it were. If you can stretch to it, the KS4 Pro is the one that will keep you happier for longer.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.

