Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
The INMOTION Air Pro is the stronger overall package: it's faster, feels more eager under throttle, shrugs off rain with confidence, and delivers a very grown-up riding experience at a noticeably lower price. If you want a lively, efficient commuter that you can carry up stairs without cursing, the Air Pro is the one that keeps putting a grin on your face.
The Apollo Air 2022 fights back with clearly superior comfort thanks to its front suspension and dual pneumatic tyres, plus a refined, "premium commuter" feel. It suits riders who value a plush ride and brand ecosystem more than outright value and speed.
In short: performance-per-euro and robustness crown the INMOTION Air Pro the winner, while the Apollo Air 2022 is the softer, more cosseting choice for comfort-first commuters. Read on if you want the full, road-tested story before dropping several hundred euros on your new daily ride.
Two scooters, one word in common: "Air". On paper, the INMOTION Air Pro and Apollo Air 2022 live in the same world - mid-range, single-motor commuters with serious aspirations. In reality, they couldn't feel more different once you've spent a week swapping between them on real city streets, dodging potholes, wet manholes and badly parked SUVs.
The INMOTION Air Pro is the brisk, no-nonsense urban tool: lean, surprisingly quick, very water-resistant, and engineered with the sort of practicality you appreciate at 07:30 on a rainy Tuesday. The Apollo Air 2022 is the smooth talker: softer, plusher, more "luxury scooter" in character, and clearly tuned to make rough tarmac feel less like punishment.
If you're torn between them, you're exactly the rider these two are fighting over. Let's break down where each one shines - and where the marketing gloss starts to fade.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
Both scooters sit in that "serious commuter, not a toy" bracket. They're not featherweight last-mile gadgets, and they're not hulking dual-motor monsters that need a gym membership to move. Think medium-distance daily commutes, regular use, and riders who actually care about how the thing feels after a few hundred kilometres, not just on day one.
The INMOTION Air Pro aims to be the compact speedster of the class - very decent pace, solid build, no-suspension simplicity, and a price tag that undercuts a lot of fancy-looking rivals. It's the scooter for people who want to get there quickly and don't mind feeling a bit more of the road.
The Apollo Air 2022 positions itself as a premium comfort commuter. It gives you suspension, a larger battery and very polished ride manners, but at a noticeably higher price. It's for riders who'd rather float over broken asphalt than chase every last kilometre per hour.
Same broad category, similar weight, similar real-world range - but very different personalities. That's why this comparison matters.
Design & Build Quality
Park them side by side and both look like "real" vehicles, not generic catalogue clones, but they get there in different ways.
The INMOTION Air Pro has that clean, almost cyberpunk vibe. Hidden cabling, a tidy cockpit, matte finish, and a deck that looks purposefully integrated rather than bolted on. Grab the stem and you immediately feel the solidity; there's no weird flex or creak when you rock it back and forth. The rear solid tyre and front drum brake are packaged neatly, and the whole scooter feels like it was designed as one piece, not a collection of suppliers' parts.
The Apollo Air 2022 pushes the "premium casting" angle hard. Its single-piece frame and wide handlebars ooze confidence, and the rubberised deck looks and feels upscale. The cable routing is also very clean, the cockpit nicely laid out, and the front fork assembly gives it a more "mini e-moped" appearance than a bare scooter. In the hands, it feels robust and dense - not cheap, but not exactly "Air" either.
Fit and finish are good on both, but the character differs. The Air Pro feels minimalist and purposeful, like a well-thought-out commuting tool. The Apollo feels more styled, with extra metal and suspension hardware giving it a chunkier presence. From a pure design-efficiency point of view, INMOTION is doing more with less; Apollo is very nicely built, but you can see where the extra euros went, and you do carry them around with you.
Ride Comfort & Handling
This is where the philosophies clash head-on.
The INMOTION Air Pro rides on a pneumatic front tyre and a solid rear, with no formal suspension. On clean tarmac and half-decent bike lanes, it feels fantastic: direct, controlled, and surprisingly refined for a rigid chassis. The front tyre takes the buzz out of the surface, and the frame has just enough flex to avoid jackhammering your joints. But once you hit older cobbles, patch repairs, or frequent lips in the pavement, you very much know it. The solid rear tyre is honest - it tells your knees everything the road is thinking.
On the Apollo Air 2022, the story flips. That front dual-fork suspension and pair of pneumatic tyres soak up the kind of nasty edges that make lesser scooters feel like dental equipment. Expansion joints, small potholes, rough seams - the fork just chews through them, and the broader handlebar keeps everything stable and predictable. After a few days of back-to-back testing, I'd happily take the Apollo for longer rides through patchy urban surfaces; it's simply less fatiguing.
Handling-wise, the Air Pro feels a bit more agile and flickable. The slightly narrower bar and lighter, simpler front end make quick direction changes easy, and the low-mounted battery keeps it feeling planted. The Apollo is calmer: more stable, more "big scooter" in steering feel. Faster sweepers and higher-speed straights feel very confidence-inspiring on both, but the Apollo feels like it leans towards comfort touring, whereas the INMOTION feels like a compact city sprinter.
If your city is mostly smooth with the odd rough spot, the Air Pro's taut, sporty feel is actually fun. If your roads look like a patchwork quilt, the Apollo's suspension starts feeling less like a luxury and more like a requirement.
Performance
In day-to-day use, the INMOTION Air Pro feels the more eager of the two. Its rear motor has that "push from behind" sensation - you kick off, roll on the thumb throttle, and it just gets on with the job. Off the line it sprints past typical rental scooters and lower-powered commuters, and at higher cruising speeds it still has enough punch to pull you around slower cyclists without a drama. For a scooter this portable, the speed it's willing to cruise at genuinely surprises people.
The Apollo Air 2022, with its beefier nominal motor rating, sounds like it should walk away, but in practice it feels more relaxed than aggressive. Acceleration is nicely linear, very civilised, and that's fantastic for newer riders or those who enjoy smooth roll-ons. It has no problem getting up to its upper speed band and staying there on the flat, but it doesn't feel particularly "hot-blooded"; more like a capable commuter which knows it's not auditioning for a drag strip.
On hills, both do respectably well for single-motor commuters. The INMOTION's rear-wheel drive and punchy peak output let it tackle typical city bridges and medium climbs without drama, especially with average-weight riders. The Apollo's stronger rated motor does help when you point it uphill, but its heavier chassis and slightly more comfort-oriented tuning mean it feels competent rather than fiery. Neither is a mountain goat; both will handle urban gradients far better than budget 250-350 W toys, with the INMOTION feeling a tad more spirited, the Apollo a tad more composed.
Braking is very similar in concept on both: front drum plus rear regenerative. On the Air Pro, the single lever that blends regen and mechanical braking is well-tuned, giving predictable, progressive stops without hysterics. You can brake hard without feeling like the front tyre is about to tuck. The Apollo adds that dedicated regen throttle, which lets you do most of your slowing via motor resistance alone. It's genuinely pleasant in traffic, and with the suspension helping the front tyre maintain contact over bumps, emergency stops feel very controlled.
Battery & Range
On spec sheets, the Apollo Air 2022 clearly has the larger battery. In the real world, though, both scooters end up in a similar ballpark for practical daily use.
Riding the INMOTION Air Pro aggressively in its sportiest mode, you can drain it in a medium-length round trip if you're really trying, but most people commuting at saner speeds will comfortably manage typical daily distances with some left in reserve. In mixed riding - some full-speed blasts, some calmer sections - it sits in that sweet spot where range stops being a daily worry and becomes a "every couple of days" thought.
The Apollo's bigger pack does give you a little more breathing room, especially if you're a heavier rider or spend a lot of time at full stick. Real-world reports and testing line up: it tends to go a bit further than the INMOTION before you're looking for a socket. However, you do start to feel that familiar voltage sag in the final stretch - the scooter softens its punch as the charge drops, which makes the last kilometres feel more sluggish.
Charging times are in the same "leave it overnight, forget about it" league. Neither is a fast-charging monster; they both suit riders who plug in at home or work and don't need lunchtime top-ups. From an efficiency standpoint - how much ride you get per watt-hour - the INMOTION actually does very well, helped by its slightly smaller, lighter package. The Apollo counters with a bit more absolute range but pulls more weight along while doing it.
Range anxiety? If your round trip is under twenty-ish kilometres, both give you plenty of margin when ridden normally. Push beyond that regularly, and the Apollo starts looking like the safer distance bet, especially in winter or hilly cities.
Portability & Practicality
Here, the marketing names play games. The scooter that actually feels more "air-like" to carry is the INMOTION Air Pro.
Both are in the same weight class on paper, but the INMOTION's slimmer profile, cable-free stem and compact folded footprint make it much easier to live with in tight European flats, offices, or train vestibules. The folding mechanism is quick and simple, and once latched, grabbing it by the stem and hauling it up a flight of stairs doesn't feel like a punishment - it's at the upper end of comfortable, but still in the realm of "doable daily".
The Apollo Air 2022 is honest enough once you've picked it up: it's not outrageously heavy, but it does feel dense and bulkier. The wide handlebars don't fold in, which makes manoeuvring through narrow doors or storing it under a desk slightly annoying. The redesigned folding latch is rock solid when riding, but you pay for that solidity with more faff when folding and unfolding, and you have to bend down low to operate it. If you do a lot of "ride-fold-carry-ride again" during the day, that ergonomy starts to grate.
On practicality beyond carrying, the INMOTION's rear solid tyre is a huge quality-of-life win. Rear flats are common on commuters, and changing a tube around a hub motor is not a fun roadside activity. With the Air Pro, you simply don't have that worry. The front pneumatic is easy enough to keep in shape and gives you the grip you want where it matters most: steering.
The Apollo's dual pneumatic tyres give better comfort and grip overall, but you accept the usual tube-life: check pressures, deal with punctures now and then, and occasionally swear at a fiddly valve stem. If you ride in glass-strewn city centres or far from your tools, the INMOTION's "never worry about the rear" approach is genuinely liberating.
Safety
Both scooters take safety reasonably seriously, which is more than can be said for half the no-name stuff on online marketplaces.
Braking systems are conceptually similar - front drum plus rear regen - and both are tuned sensibly. The INMOTION's blended single-lever system is idiot-proof in a good way: you grab, it slows, the electronics do the prioritising, and you don't have to think about which wheel is doing what. The Apollo's split controls (throttle plus regen lever) reward a more engaged rider who likes modulating braking and using regen as a primary tool, with the drum there as a strong backup.
Lighting is where the INMOTION takes a clear lead. Its headlight is a genuine "see where you're going" unit, not just a token "be seen" glow. Night riding on unlit paths feels noticeably less stressful on the Air Pro; you actually spot hazards before you're on top of them. The Apollo's headlight is fine in lit urban areas but feels underwhelming if you venture onto darker sections - I'd call it adequate but not confidence-inspiring on its own.
Tyre grip is a nuanced story. Two pneumatic tyres on the Apollo give lovely traction and feedback, particularly in the wet, while the INMOTION's solid rear can feel a touch skittish if you're ham-fisted on slippery surfaces. That said, most of your steering and emergency path changes rely on the front tyre, and both scooters run air up front, so real danger moments are more about rider behaviour than tyre material.
Water protection is a big tick in the INMOTION column. An IP rating that meaningfully separates body and battery protection is rare at this price, and it shows. You really don't feel nervous about damp commutes or unexpected showers. The Apollo's rating is acceptable for light rain and splashes, but you're more inclined to cut a ride short if the skies turn dramatic.
Community Feedback
| INMOTION Air Pro | Apollo Air 2022 |
|---|---|
| What riders love | What riders love |
|
|
| What riders complain about | What riders complain about |
|
|
Price & Value
This is where things get blunt.
The INMOTION Air Pro lives in the mid-range price band but punches up in performance. For what you pay, you get very healthy speed, solid construction, a well-thought-out maintenance concept, and water protection that some pricier machines don't bother matching. You're not buying a bare-bones budget scooter: you're getting proper commuting performance with very few corners cut where it actually matters day-to-day.
The Apollo Air 2022 sits comfortably higher on the price ladder. What you're paying for is ride comfort, refinement, and a somewhat more "premium" brand experience. If you judge scooters purely by spec-per-euro, Apollo struggles to justify the difference. If you value a smoother ride and a highly polished feel, the calculus becomes softer, but still - it's a big jump for comfort, not for a transformative leap in capability.
For most riders who count their euros and still want a serious commuter, the INMOTION offers noticeably better value. The Apollo makes more sense if you explicitly prioritise comfort and don't mind paying the premium for that one pillar.
Service & Parts Availability
INMOTION has a long-standing presence in the personal electric vehicle world, especially in electric unicycles, and that shows in their distribution and parts chains. In Europe, you can generally find authorised sellers, spares and reasonably knowledgeable service partners without having to ship your scooter across continents. Consumables like tyres and brake components are not exotic, and the design choices (drum brake, solid rear tyre) reduce how often you even need service.
Apollo, though a younger brand, has invested heavily in customer support and community interaction. Their reputation for responsive service - particularly in North America - is one of their selling points, and they do have partners in Europe too. Parts for the Air 2022 are available, but you are tied more tightly into their ecosystem for certain components, especially that proprietary fork and folding hardware. It's all serviceable, but you're a little more dependent on official channels.
Either way, you're miles ahead of nameless white-label scooters - both brands actually answer emails. INMOTION's longer track record and simpler hardware give it a slight real-world edge for long-term ownership in Europe, especially if you're the "fix it myself with a basic toolkit" type.
Pros & Cons Summary
| INMOTION Air Pro | Apollo Air 2022 |
|---|---|
Pros
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
Cons
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | INMOTION Air Pro | Apollo Air 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Motor power (nominal) | 400 W rear | 500 W rear |
| Peak power | 750 W | n/a (higher than nominal) |
| Top speed | ca. 35 km/h | ca. 32-35 km/h |
| Advertised range | bis zu 48 km | bis zu 50 km |
| Realistic range | ca. 25-35 km | ca. 30-37 km |
| Battery capacity | 438 Wh (36 V) | 540 Wh (36 V) |
| Weight | 17,7 kg | 17,6 kg |
| Brakes | Front drum, rear regen | Front drum, rear regen |
| Suspension | Keine | Front dual fork |
| Tyres | 10" front pneumatic, 10" rear solid | 10" pneumatic front & rear |
| Max load | 120 kg | 100-120 kg |
| IP rating | IP55 body / IPX7 battery | IP54 |
| Charging time | ca. 8,5 h | ca. 7-9 h |
| Price (approx.) | ca. 661 € | ca. 919 € |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
After many kilometres swapping between these two, the INMOTION Air Pro comes out as the more convincing all-round choice for most riders. It delivers punchy performance, serious water resistance, low-maintenance hardware and a very clean design at a price that feels almost suspiciously reasonable in today's market. If your commute is mostly decent tarmac, you care about speed and practicality, and you don't want your scooter budget to look like a small car payment, the Air Pro is simply hard to argue against.
The Apollo Air 2022 wins decisively on comfort and plushness. If your daily roads are rough, you have recurring knee or back issues, or you just want to glide rather than feel the texture of every paving stone, its suspension and dual pneumatic tyres earn their keep. You pay more and carry more bulk, but you genuinely arrive more relaxed.
So: riders chasing the best balance of price, performance, and everyday robustness should lean towards the INMOTION Air Pro. Those willing to pay a premium mainly for comfort and a slightly more luxurious feel will appreciate what the Apollo Air 2022 brings - just go in knowing you're paying for smoothness, not outright capability.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | INMOTION Air Pro | Apollo Air 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ✅ 1,51 €/Wh | ❌ 1,70 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ✅ 18,89 €/km/h | ❌ 26,26 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ❌ 40,41 g/Wh | ✅ 32,59 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | ❌ 0,51 kg/km/h | ✅ 0,50 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ✅ 22,03 €/km | ❌ 27,45 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ❌ 0,59 kg/km | ✅ 0,53 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ✅ 14,60 Wh/km | ❌ 16,12 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ❌ 11,43 W/km/h | ✅ 14,29 W/km/h |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | ❌ 0,044 kg/W | ✅ 0,035 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ❌ 51,53 W | ✅ 67,50 W |
These metrics put hard numbers on different aspects of ownership. Price-per-Wh and price-per-km/h show how much performance and energy capacity you get for your money. Weight-based ratios tell you how efficiently each scooter uses its mass for speed, range and power. Wh-per-km is a straight efficiency measure - how thirsty the scooter is per kilometre. Power-to-speed and weight-to-power ratios describe how muscular each feels for its top speed and mass. Finally, the charging metric reflects how quickly energy is pushed back into the pack - a higher figure means less time tethered to a wall.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | INMOTION Air Pro | Apollo Air 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ✅ Feels slightly easier to haul | ❌ Bulkier, wide fixed bars |
| Range | ❌ Slightly shorter real distance | ✅ Goes a bit further |
| Max Speed | ✅ Holds top pace eagerly | ❌ More relaxed at the top |
| Power | ❌ Lower rated motor output | ✅ Stronger nominal motor |
| Battery Size | ❌ Smaller capacity pack | ✅ Bigger commuter battery |
| Suspension | ❌ None, fully rigid | ✅ Proper front fork |
| Design | ✅ Sleek, minimal, hidden cables | ❌ Good, but visually heavier |
| Safety | ✅ Better lights, great IP rating | ❌ Lighting, water proofing weaker |
| Practicality | ✅ Easier to store and carry | ❌ Wide, awkward when folded |
| Comfort | ❌ Harsh on broken surfaces | ✅ Plush, far less fatigue |
| Features | ✅ App, regen, solid tyre logic | ✅ App tuning, regen lever |
| Serviceability | ✅ Simple, fewer complex parts | ❌ Fork, tubes more fiddly |
| Customer Support | ✅ Established EUC-focused brand | ✅ Strong, responsive Apollo team |
| Fun Factor | ✅ Lively, sprightly, zippy feel | ❌ Calm rather than exciting |
| Build Quality | ✅ Solid, clean, no rattles | ✅ Premium, robust chassis |
| Component Quality | ✅ Very decent at this price | ✅ Nicely spec'd throughout |
| Brand Name | ✅ Strong PEV reputation | ✅ Modern, rider-centric brand |
| Community | ✅ Big INMOTION owner base | ✅ Active Apollo community |
| Lights (visibility) | ✅ Bright, eye-catching front | ❌ Adequate but not standout |
| Lights (illumination) | ✅ Actually lights dark paths | ❌ Needs extra light off-road |
| Acceleration | ✅ Feels punchy, eager | ❌ Smooth but less thrilling |
| Arrive with smile factor | ✅ Zippy, engaging every ride | ❌ Satisfying, not exciting |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ❌ Rigid, more body workload | ✅ Suspension, less body stress |
| Charging speed | ❌ Slower average charging rate | ✅ Slightly quicker fill-up |
| Reliability | ✅ Fewer flat-prone components | ❌ Tubes, more to babysit |
| Folded practicality | ✅ Slim, manageable package | ❌ Wide bars, awkward latch |
| Ease of transport | ✅ One-hand carry realistic | ❌ More cumbersome in crowds |
| Handling | ✅ Agile, nimble in city | ✅ Very stable at speed |
| Braking performance | ✅ Strong, well-tuned blend | ✅ Excellent with regen help |
| Riding position | ✅ Natural, comfortable stance | ✅ Spacious, very ergonomic |
| Handlebar quality | ✅ Solid, appropriate width | ✅ Wide, confidence inspiring |
| Throttle response | ✅ Direct, engaging, predictable | ✅ Smooth, beginner-friendly |
| Dashboard/Display | ❌ Sunlight visibility weaker | ✅ Clearer, more integrated |
| Security (locking) | ✅ App lock, simple to secure | ✅ App integration, standard locks |
| Weather protection | ✅ Class-leading water sealing | ❌ Adequate, but less robust |
| Resale value | ✅ Strong for value-focused buyers | ✅ Good in comfort niche |
| Tuning potential | ✅ App, tyres, basic mods | ✅ App tuning, setup tweaks |
| Ease of maintenance | ✅ Solid rear, simple brakes | ❌ Tubes, fork, latch fussier |
| Value for Money | ✅ Excellent performance per euro | ❌ Comfort premium is expensive |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the INMOTION AIR PRO scores 4 points against the APOLLO Air 2022's 6. In the Author's Category Battle, the INMOTION AIR PRO gets 31 ✅ versus 22 ✅ for APOLLO Air 2022 (with a few ties sprinkled in).
Totals: INMOTION AIR PRO scores 35, APOLLO Air 2022 scores 28.
Based on the scoring, the INMOTION AIR PRO is our overall winner. Between these two, the INMOTION Air Pro simply feels like the more complete, no-nonsense partner for everyday city life - it's fast enough to be fun, tough enough to trust, and affordable enough that you don't wince every time you park it outside a café. The Apollo Air 2022 is genuinely lovely to ride, and if you crave comfort above all else you'll appreciate how calm and cushioned it makes every journey feel. But for most riders who want their scooter to earn its keep day in, day out, the Air Pro hits that rare balance of excitement, practicality and price that keeps you reaching for its handlebars every morning without a second thought.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.

