Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
The INMOTION S1F is the overall winner here: it may not be wildly exciting, but it is the more complete, mature scooter for real-world commuting, especially if you care about comfort, range, and day-to-day reliability. The TURBOANT R9 is the faster, rowdier choice and makes sense if you are on a tighter budget and want maximum speed and suspension fun for the least amount of cash, and can live with compromises in refinement and support.
Pick the S1F if you want a "ride, lock, forget" workhorse that just keeps going, particularly for longer commutes and heavier riders. Pick the R9 if your rides are shorter, you crave that extra top-end rush, and you are willing to accept more rough edges in exchange for the thrill and lower price.
If you want to really understand the trade-offs-and avoid buyer's remorse-read on; the differences get much more interesting once you're past the spec sheets.
Electric scooters have grown out of their toy phase. Somewhere between flimsy rentals and terrifying dual-motor monsters sits a sweet spot: proper, adult commuters that you can rely on every day. The INMOTION S1F and TURBOANT R9 both claim to live there-but they approach it from very different angles.
The S1F is your long-range sofa on wheels: built for bigger riders, bigger distances, and people who like their spine intact after a week of commuting. The R9 is the budget hot-hatch: quick, loud in personality, and more about grins per euro than quiet refinement.
I've ridden both over enough bad tarmac, wet mornings and late-night runs to know where each one shines-and where the marketing gloss starts to crack. Let's dig into which one actually fits your life, not just your wishlist.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
On paper, these two shouldn't be that far apart: both are single-motor, sprung, 10-inch-tyre commuters with proper adult speeds and serious batteries, sitting in the mid-market price band. In practice, they're very different characters aimed at slightly different riders who might still cross-shop them.
The INMOTION S1F targets the "serious commuter" and "big rider" crowd: people doing longer daily distances, often carrying extra kilos-either around the waist or in the backpack-and who want car-replacement range and comfort more than bragging rights at the traffic lights.
The TURBOANT R9 is aimed at the budget-conscious adrenaline commuter: someone stepping up from a basic 25 km/h toy, craving real speed and suspension without jumping into four-figure prices. It's for riders who want to feel they've hacked the system by getting "big scooter speed" for small-scooter money.
They overlap because both promise to carry an adult at real-world speeds, over less-than-perfect roads, without disintegrating in one season. If you're hunting for a first "proper" scooter, these two will probably end up on the same shortlist-and that's where the nuances really matter.
Design & Build Quality
Pick up the S1F (or try to) and the first thing you notice is how monolithic it feels. The frame has that "one solid casting" vibe, cables are mostly tucked away, and nothing rattles much, even after a few dozen kilometres of cobbles. It's more appliance than gadget: you get the sense INMOTION wanted something you wouldn't have to fuss over every weekend.
The R9, by contrast, looks like it's been to the gym: matte black, red springs, a slightly over-styled front fender, and a stance that screams "I go fast." Up close, though, the difference in refinement shows. Welds and joins are fine but less polished, the cockpit feels a bit more generic, and there's that faint "value brand" aura you notice once you've ridden higher-end scooters. It doesn't feel flimsy, just a bit more cost-optimised.
Ergonomically, the S1F takes the grown-up route: tall stem, big, rubberised deck, and a nicely integrated display that's easy to glance at, even in ugly midday glare. The deck coating feels automotive rather than skateboard. The R9 counters with wide handlebars and a long, usable deck, but the display is more basic and can wash out in strong sun. Fine for commuting; not exactly cockpit porn.
Overall, if you care about that "proper vehicle" impression and long-term solidity, the S1F pulls ahead. The R9 gets the job done, but you're always faintly aware you bought the quick one on sale.
Ride Comfort & Handling
This is where the S1F quietly earns its keep. Its suspension is tuned on the plush side of things. Hit a long stretch of cracked pavement or those delightful European "historic" cobbles and the S1F just shrugs them off. After 10 km of battered bike lanes, my knees and lower back still feel like they belong to the same species.
The R9 also comes with proper dual suspension front and rear, plus knobbly pneumatic tyres. On fresh tarmac it feels almost over-equipped, but the moment you dive onto gravel paths or chewed-up side streets, you're glad those springs are there. That said, the R9's suspension feels firmer and a touch more crude. It absorbs the big hits, but it doesn't filter vibrations as gracefully as the S1F. You're still comfortable-just a bit more aware of the road's bad decisions.
In corners, the R9's wide bars and sporty stance make it the livelier partner. It's eager to lean, and at moderate speeds it feels playful and quite fun. Push its top end and the weight plus knobbly tyres make it feel a bit busier than I'd like. The S1F, with its long wheelbase and low centre of gravity, is more of a steady cruiser: it doesn't beg to be thrown into corners, but it tracks straight and calm, even when the road surface stops cooperating.
If your daily route is a patchwork of broken asphalt, tram tracks and "temporary" roadworks that have been there since last summer, the S1F is the one that leaves you less shaken and mysteriously less grumpy at the office door.
Performance
Acceleration on the S1F is best described as "grown-up sensible." It pulls cleanly, without any nasty throttle spikes. In its sportiest mode, it gets off the line briskly enough to clear intersections with confidence, but it never tries to rip the bars out of your hands. Up to its top speed it feels smooth, predictable and, frankly, adequate. Not thrilling-but you don't feel underpowered in normal city flow, especially in bike lanes and 30-zones.
Switch to the R9 and the tone changes. The 48-volt system gives its motor more snap, and you feel that from the first push. It leaps forward more willingly, and on clear straights it just keeps building speed until you're comfortably ahead of what most rental or budget scooters can manage. For riders used to 25 km/h limits, the first week on the R9 feels like cheating.
On hills, the S1F is quietly impressive. It doesn't advertise itself as a performance beast, yet it trudges up steep city ramps with surprisingly little drama, especially if you're on the heavier side. It won't storm every incline at full tilt, but it avoids the humiliating "get off and push" moments that plague weaker commuters. The R9 also climbs well thanks to that 48-volt punch, but heavier riders will notice it running out of breath sooner than the spec sheet bravado suggests.
Braking is another story. The S1F uses a front drum plus rear regen setup that feels progressive and very commuter-friendly once you've adapted to the regen kicking in first. You don't get razor-sharp sports-bike bite, but you do get stable, drama-free stops in the wet, with virtually no maintenance. The R9's dual drums plus aggressive electronic braking, on the other hand, can feel a bit binary out of the box: plenty of power, but modulation is an acquired taste. It will stop you all right, you just need to retrain your fingers to avoid involuntary test-rides of the handlebar stem.
Battery & Range
Range is where the S1F stops pretending and just flexes. Its battery is big for this class, and you feel it in daily use. Commutes that would drain a typical mid-range scooter to "please find socket now" levels barely nudge the S1F into mild concern. Two or three days of mixed riding between charges is entirely realistic if you're not absolutely hammering it. Range anxiety becomes more of a vague memory than a daily companion.
The R9, with a slightly smaller pack and sportier riding style baked into its character, is more modest. In the real world you're looking at roughly one solid city day-say, a decent return commute plus some detours-before you really should plug in. That's fine for most people, but it doesn't leave the same comfortable buffer. Run it hard at top speed and the gauge drops noticeably quicker than on the S1F, especially for heavier riders or hilly routes.
Charging habits differ too. The S1F's battery takes its time on a single charger, but the dual-port setup means you can cut that wait roughly in half if you invest in a second unit. For heavy users-delivery riders, for example-that actually matters. The R9's charge time is standard "overnight or workday" territory; there's no clever fast-charge trickery, you just treat it like a phone from the pre-fast-charge era and plan ahead.
If you hate thinking about range and want your scooter to be the last thing limiting your day, the S1F is clearly ahead. The R9 is perfectly serviceable, but it's not the one you choose for epic urban marathons.
Portability & Practicality
Neither of these scooters is what I'd call "shoulder-friendly." Both land in that mid-20-kg zone where one flight of stairs is fine, two is an annoyance, and three is a lifestyle choice. If your daily routine involves regular stair-climbing, you may want to re-evaluate your life-or at least your scooter choice.
The S1F is long, tall and proud. The non-telescopic stem is a blessing while riding and a curse when you try to stash it behind a sofa or in a tiny boot. It folds relatively easily and the mechanism inspires confidence, but the folded package still screams "full-size vehicle." It's happiest in garages, basements and lifts, not wedged into a packed rush-hour metro carriage.
The R9 isn't dramatically more compact, but its proportions and latch-and-hook folding design make it slightly easier to wrestle into car boots and under desks. The wide bars still take up space, though, and at this weight you won't be nonchalantly swinging it onto train luggage racks. It's a scooter you roll, not carry, and that goes for both of them.
In day-to-day practicality, the S1F's water protection, big deck and "just works" hardware give it the edge for people using a scooter as daily transport rather than a toy. The R9 answers with handy touches like a handlebar USB port, which is nice, but if your commute is genuinely your primary use, the S1F feels more like a tool built for the job.
Safety
Stability is a big safety factor, and here the S1F leans into its limo persona. The long wheelbase, low battery placement and tubeless tyres give it a planted feel that helps a lot at its top speed. There's less twitchiness, and those tubeless tyres are slightly more forgiving of small punctures-often giving you enough grace to roll to safety instead of experiencing an instant, interesting lesson in emergency dismounts.
The R9 feels stable enough at speed, but there's more going on. The knobby tyres, higher top end and livelier suspension tuning mean you're busier on the bars when the road gets messy. It's not scary, but you have to stay more engaged-especially when you're exploring the upper half of the speedometer. This is not the scooter you half-zone out on while daydreaming about lunch.
Lighting is one of the S1F's party tricks. The high-mounted headlight throws usable light down the road rather than onto its own front tyre, and the automatic turn signals are genuinely clever: lean or turn and they announce your intentions without you having to fiddle with buttons mid-corner. Side deck lighting also makes you far more visible in urban traffic at night.
The R9's headlight is decent and the turn signals plus audible beeper are functionally excellent-if slightly less elegant. You certainly won't forget you've left an indicator on. Combined with a proper horn, it's well set up for mixing with cars, but it doesn't feel as integrated or thoughtfully executed as the S1F's system.
Brakes, as mentioned earlier, lean in different directions: S1F prioritises smoothness and low maintenance; R9 goes for raw stopping power with slightly rough manners. Depending on your preferences, either can work, but for less experienced riders, the INMOTION's more predictable feel is easier to live with.
Community Feedback
| INMOTION S1F | TURBOANT R9 |
|---|---|
What riders love
|
What riders love
|
What riders complain about
|
What riders complain about
|
Price & Value
The R9's headline advantage is obvious: it comes in notably cheaper than the S1F yet offers proper suspension and real speed. For riders stepping up from a rental-grade scooter, it feels like a massive upgrade for a relatively small hit to the wallet. If budget is absolutely king and you want thrills per euro, it's hard to deny the appeal.
The S1F, however, plays the long game. You pay more up front, but you're buying into better range, more refined comfort, stronger water-proofing, and a brand with a track record for supporting hardware for years. Factor in reduced range anxiety, fewer upgrade temptations, and likely better resale, and the value equation starts tilting back in its favour, especially if you genuinely commute every day rather than ride twice a week for fun.
In short: the R9 is the louder bargain; the S1F is the quieter investment.
Service & Parts Availability
INMOTION is an established player with a solid distribution network in Europe, plus an ecosystem of third-party repair shops familiar with their hardware thanks to the popularity of their unicycles. Parts like tyres, controllers and displays are relatively easy to source, and firmware support via the app is an actual thing, not a marketing promise.
TURBOANT, being a direct-to-consumer brand, keeps costs low but doesn't have the same depth of physical service presence. When things go wrong, you're more likely to end up in an email chain and possibly doing some at-home wrenching with shipped parts. Some riders report great support, others less so-it's not catastrophic, but it's not as reassuring as a more mature service network either.
If you're not particularly handy with tools or you just want predictable, boring after-sales experience, the S1F is, frankly, the safer bet.
Pros & Cons Summary
| INMOTION S1F | TURBOANT R9 |
|---|---|
Pros
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
Cons
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | INMOTION S1F | TURBOANT R9 |
|---|---|---|
| Motor power (rated) | 500 W rear hub | 500 W rear hub |
| Top speed | ca. 40 km/h | ca. 45 km/h |
| Battery capacity | 675 Wh, 54 V | 600 Wh, 48 V |
| Claimed range | bis etwa 95 km | bis etwa 56 km |
| Real-world range (typical) | ca. 50-70 km | ca. 25-32 km |
| Weight | 24 kg | 25 kg |
| Brakes | Front drum + rear regen | Front & rear drum + regen |
| Suspension | Front dual shocks, rear dual springs | Front & rear dual springs (quad) |
| Tyres | 10" pneumatic tubeless | 10" pneumatic tubed, all-terrain |
| Max load | 140 kg | 125 kg |
| Water resistance | IP55 | IP54 |
| Charging time | ca. 7 h (1 charger) | ca. 6-8 h |
| Approx. price | ca. 807 € | ca. 462 € |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
If I had to live with one of these as my daily transport, it would be the INMOTION S1F. It's not the one that makes you giggle on day one, but it is the one that still feels like a solid, trustworthy companion on day three hundred. The combination of range, comfort and general polish makes it better suited to real-life commuting, especially for heavier riders or anyone facing longer distances and mixed weather.
The TURBOANT R9 absolutely has its place. If your rides are relatively short, your budget is tight, and what you really want is that feeling of finally breaking free from 25 km/h purgatory, the R9 will deliver more speed and fun than you'd expect for the money. Just go in with eyes open about the range, support, and braking quirks, and treat it more like a spirited budget hot-hatch than a long-distance touring machine.
In simple terms: if you want a scooter to replace big chunks of your public transport or car use, the S1F is the safer, saner long-term choice. If you want to spice up a medium-length commute without draining your bank account, and you're happy to accept some compromises, the R9 is the cheap thrill that mostly gets away with it.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | INMOTION S1F | TURBOANT R9 |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ❌ 1,20 €/Wh | ✅ 0,77 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ❌ 20,18 €/km/h | ✅ 10,27 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ✅ 35,56 g/Wh | ❌ 41,67 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | ❌ 0,60 kg/km/h | ✅ 0,56 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ✅ 13,45 €/km | ❌ 16,21 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ✅ 0,40 kg/km | ❌ 0,88 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ✅ 11,25 Wh/km | ❌ 21,05 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ✅ 12,50 W/(km/h) | ❌ 11,11 W/(km/h) |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | ✅ 0,048 kg/W | ❌ 0,050 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ✅ 96,43 W | ❌ 85,71 W |
These metrics strip away the marketing and look purely at how much performance and battery you get for your money and weight. The R9 clearly wins on upfront cost per watt and per km/h, making it the stronger budget play, while the S1F dominates efficiency, range-per-kilo, and energy use, underlining its role as the more effective long-distance commuter and better user of every Wh you carry.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | INMOTION S1F | TURBOANT R9 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ✅ Slightly lighter, still hefty | ❌ Heavier, harder to lug |
| Range | ✅ Easily doubles real distance | ❌ Shorter, more frequent charges |
| Max Speed | ❌ Fast enough, not wild | ✅ Noticeably higher top end |
| Power | ✅ Strong torque, hill friendly | ❌ Feels punchy, less versatile |
| Battery Size | ✅ Bigger pack, more autonomy | ❌ Smaller, empties quicker |
| Suspension | ✅ Plusher, more composed | ❌ Firmer, less refined |
| Design | ✅ Clean, integrated, grown-up | ❌ Sporty, but cheaper feel |
| Safety | ✅ Lighting, stability, predictability | ❌ Faster, twitchier, abrupt brakes |
| Practicality | ✅ Better for daily commuting | ❌ Fun tool, less practical |
| Comfort | ✅ Softer, less fatigue | ❌ Good, but less plush |
| Features | ✅ App, auto indicators, dual charge | ❌ Simpler, fewer tricks |
| Serviceability | ✅ Better ecosystem, known brand | ❌ D2C, patchier support |
| Customer Support | ✅ Generally more consistent | ❌ Mixed, sometimes frustrating |
| Fun Factor | ❌ Calm, not a thrill ride | ✅ Speedy, playful, exciting |
| Build Quality | ✅ Feels more solid overall | ❌ Sturdy but more budget |
| Component Quality | ✅ Better-chosen, more durable | ❌ Functional, cost-cut in spots |
| Brand Name | ✅ Established PEV specialist | ❌ Younger, value-oriented brand |
| Community | ✅ Larger, more mature base | ❌ Smaller, less resources |
| Lights (visibility) | ✅ Side strips, indicators, bright | ❌ Adequate but less sophisticated |
| Lights (illumination) | ✅ High-mounted, good spread | ❌ Decent, more basic beam |
| Acceleration | ❌ Smooth, not explosive | ✅ Zippier, feels quicker |
| Arrive with smile factor | ❌ Calm satisfaction | ✅ Grin after every sprint |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ✅ Less fatigue, very chilled | ❌ More intense, busier ride |
| Charging speed | ✅ Faster average, dual-port option | ❌ Standard, no real tricks |
| Reliability | ✅ Proven, commuter-oriented | ❌ Fine, but less track record |
| Folded practicality | ❌ Long, tall, awkward | ✅ Slightly easier to stash |
| Ease of transport | ❌ Heavy, bulky to haul | ✅ Also heavy, but marginally |
| Handling | ✅ Stable, confidence inspiring | ❌ Livelier, but less composed |
| Braking performance | ✅ Predictable, adequate stopping | ❌ Strong, but awkward feel |
| Riding position | ✅ Upright, comfortable stance | ❌ Sporty, less relaxed |
| Handlebar quality | ✅ Solid, ergonomic grips | ❌ Wide, but more basic |
| Throttle response | ✅ Smooth, linear control | ❌ Sharper, more abrupt |
| Dashboard/Display | ✅ Clear, integrated, readable | ❌ Basic, glare issues |
| Security (locking) | ✅ App-lock, better integration | ❌ No smart locking options |
| Weather protection | ✅ Better sealing, higher rating | ❌ Acceptable, but less robust |
| Resale value | ✅ Stronger brand, demand | ❌ Budget image hurts resale |
| Tuning potential | ✅ App, firmware tweaks possible | ❌ Limited, no official app |
| Ease of maintenance | ✅ Tubeless, drum, stable parts | ❌ Tubes, drums, more fiddly |
| Value for Money | ✅ Better long-term proposition | ❌ Great price, more compromises |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the INMOTION S1F scores 7 points against the TURBOANT R9's 3. In the Author's Category Battle, the INMOTION S1F gets 33 ✅ versus 6 ✅ for TURBOANT R9.
Totals: INMOTION S1F scores 40, TURBOANT R9 scores 9.
Based on the scoring, the INMOTION S1F is our overall winner. When the novelty wears off and the kilometres start piling on, the INMOTION S1F simply feels like the scooter you can count on: calmer, more comfortable, and built to quietly get you where you need to be without drama. The TURBOANT R9 makes a louder first impression and delivers plenty of fun for the money, but it never quite escapes the sense that you've chosen excitement over depth. If your scooter is going to be a daily companion rather than an occasional toy, the S1F is the one that will keep you riding longer, worrying less, and arriving home with that quiet, satisfied "this just works" feeling.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.

