Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
The INOKIM OXO is the overall winner here: it rides better, feels more solid, and is built like a long-distance "land surfer" you'll still enjoy years from now. It's the choice if you want true motorcycle-like stability, exceptional comfort, and a scooter that feels engineered rather than assembled. The APOLLO City Pro fights back with modern features, app integration, great brakes and weather protection at a lower price, making it the better pick for tech-savvy urban commuters who stay mostly on roads and care about connectivity and IP rating more than outright refinement. If you want a scooter that feels like a premium machine first and a gadget second, go OXO; if you want a clever urban tool with lots of smart touches, the City Pro is your ally. Now let's dig into how they actually feel once the tarmac starts rolling under your feet.
Both scooters promise to replace your car or your transport pass, but they go about it with very different personalities. I've spent enough kilometres on each to know exactly where they shine, where they annoy, and who will actually be happier living with which one.
The INOKIM OXO is the grand tourer of e-scooters: a big, planted, gloriously comfortable machine that turns bad roads into background noise and long rides into something you actively look forward to. The APOLLO City Pro, by contrast, is the modern urban multitool: turn signals, self-healing tyres, an app, fast charging and serious weather resistance wrapped in a sleek shell.
One is a vehicle with a capital V, the other is an extremely competent connected commuter. If that already rings a bell in your head, you may know your winner; if not, keep reading.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
On paper, these two shouldn't be far apart: dual-motor, serious speed, real-world ranges that make daily commuting trivial, both clearly above the "toy scooter" bracket yet not quite in the insane racing monster category. They're what you look at when you've outgrown your Xiaomi or Ninebot and want something that can actually replace a car for most city trips.
The OXO sits at the heavier, more expensive, more "enthusiast" end. It's the scooter you buy when you've decided this isn't a phase and you want something that feels engineered to last, even if that means sacrificing convenience and gadgets.
The City Pro is the pragmatic premium commuter: cheaper, lighter (relatively), crammed with clever features and much more forgiving if you ride in the rain or like to tweak things in an app. They occupy the same broad use case - serious daily transport - but embody two very different philosophies, which is precisely why they're worth comparing head-to-head.
Design & Build Quality
Pick up an OXO (or, more realistically, try to) and it immediately feels like a single piece of metal that someone happened to turn into a scooter. The aviation-grade frame, the single-sided swingarms, the beautifully integrated cabling - it's industrial design with a bit of soul. Nothing rattles, nothing feels cheap, and even after thousands of kilometres, the usual suspects (hinges, stem, deck, swingarms) tend to stay impressively tight.
The City Pro goes for "modern consumer product" vibes. Think gunmetal sculpture with sharply drawn lines and integrated everything: lights, cables, even the turn signals look like they belong on a production car. The deck's rubber mat is a joy after dealing with grimy, peeling grip tape on lesser scooters, and the overall frame feels dense and serious rather than hollow. The drums and enclosed wiring also help with the "solid object" feel.
Where they clearly diverge is design philosophy. The OXO is mechanical first, digital last: no app, no TFT screen, just a simple display and hardware that looks like it will survive the apocalypse. The City Pro is the opposite: app connectivity, custom settings, integrated regen throttle, sophisticated lighting. It feels like it came out of a design lab that also does laptops.
In the hands, the OXO feels more like a small motorbike, the City Pro more like a premium consumer gadget that grew wheels. Both are well built, but if you're a sucker for hardcore engineering and timeless shapes, the OXO has an edge in sheer physical presence and long-term solidity.
Ride Comfort & Handling
This is where the OXO starts flexing. That rubber torsion suspension is the stuff of legend for a reason. Hit cobblestones, cracked pavement, or those hateful concrete patches where cities join cycle paths and roads, and the OXO just... sighs and moves on. The chassis stays calm, your knees stay happy, and you start deliberately taking the "ugly" routes because you finally can. Long rides of several dozen kilometres? You step off feeling like you've been gently rocked rather than shaken.
The City Pro is genuinely good here too - better than most commuters. The triple-spring setup and tubeless tyres filter out a lot of buzz, and typical city nastiness (expansion joints, manhole covers, rough asphalt) is handled with ease. You feel more of the road than on the OXO, but not in a punishing way. It's tuned for controlled composure rather than sofa softness, which makes sense for urban speeds and agile steering.
Handling wise, the OXO is the long-wheelbase tourer. At speed it's superbly planted, almost eerily calm. Quick direction changes require more deliberate input, but once you lean it into a sweeping corner, it carves like it's on rails. It's the scooter you want when bombing along a riverside path or threading fast but confidently through traffic.
The City Pro, with its slightly shorter package and lighter frame, feels more nimble. It's easier to dodge pedestrians, slip through gaps and generally behave like a city predator. At higher speeds it's stable enough, but you're more aware you're on a commuter - the OXO simply shrugs off speed in a way the Apollo can't quite match.
If your daily ride includes a lot of broken surfaces and you value feeling fresh at the end, the OXO is in another league. If your riding is mostly urban, with average roads and lots of weaving, the City Pro's lighter, more agile feel is a better match - just not as magic-carpet as the Inokim.
Performance
Both scooters are fast enough to get you into trouble; the difference is in how they serve the power and how "serious" they feel doing it.
The OXO's dual motors deliver a smooth, relentless shove. In Turbo mode with both motors live, it builds speed like a small electric motorcycle: not a violent punch, more an irresistible surge. You glance at the display and realise you're going significantly quicker than your brain thought, yet the chassis still feels utterly unbothered. Top end is well into "probably not legal here" territory, and hills - even ugly, long ones - are dispatched with almost comic ease.
The downside? There's a small dead zone at the start of the throttle. It's intentional, designed to avoid accidental surges, but if you're coming from a snappier scooter it can feel a touch lazy off the line until your thumb learns the sweet spot. Once engaged, though, it pulls very hard and very confidently.
The City Pro's dual motors don't quite have the same outright muscle, but they're no slouch. Acceleration is brisk, especially up to typical city speeds, and the MACH controllers give it a "velvet hammer" profile: quick, yet never twitchy or scary. You get up to its top end rapidly enough to outpace cyclists and keep up with urban traffic, though at maximum speed you're more aware of the scooter working for it than on the OXO.
On hills, the Apollo does well for its class. Steep city climbs are handled without drama, but if you throw both scooters at a long, punishing gradient, the OXO keeps more of its pace and composure, especially with heavier riders or a loaded backpack.
Braking is an interesting split: the OXO's dual hydraulic discs have classic, progressive power - squeeze harder, stop harder, with a reassuring bite that feels very motorbike-like. The City Pro's combo of drum brakes and that dedicated regen throttle is genuinely impressive: in daily riding you mostly use the regen lever, slowing the scooter smoothly while feeding energy back into the pack, and only call up the drums when you need a more assertive stop. Pure ultimate stopping power still feels a tad stronger on the OXO, but the Apollo's system is more refined and convenient for urban riding.
Battery & Range
Battery-wise, the OXO is the heavyweight. Its pack is considerably larger, and in practice you feel that in how casually you can abuse the throttle without watching the gauge drop in panic. Even riding spiritedly, using both motors and not babying it, you can cover a serious amount of distance before you start wondering where the next socket is. Ride more sensibly, and it becomes a genuine "forget to charge because it just keeps going" machine.
The price for that big pack is charging time. With the stock charger you're in full overnight territory from low to full. Not a problem if you plug in at home after work, but it's not the "quick lunch top-up" kind of scooter unless you invest in a faster charger.
The City Pro's battery is smaller but still well above typical commuter fare. Real-world, you get enough for most day-to-day use: several tens of kilometres even when riding in the sportier modes, more if you keep things gentle. For city life, that's usually plenty - go to work, detour for errands, come back, repeat tomorrow without range anxiety.
Its secret ace is charging. The Apollo refills startlingly quickly for its capacity. You can realistically arrive at the office low, plug in, and by lunchtime you're more or less ready for another full session. For someone without secure overnight charging at home, that matters a lot.
In short: the OXO is the long-range tourer that lets you misbehave without guilt, the City Pro is the efficient commuter with much friendlier turnaround times. If your rides regularly stretch to the edges of each scooter's claimed potential, the OXO is the safer bet; if they're comfortably shorter and you like the idea of fast daytime top-ups, the Apollo is extremely convenient.
Portability & Practicality
Let's be blunt: neither of these is a "tuck under your arm and hop on the tram" scooter, but one is clearly more forgiving.
The OXO is heavy in a way you feel in your soul when you try to carry it up a staircase. Folding is quick and the stem locks securely, but the non-folding handlebars and sheer mass make it more of a rolling vehicle than something you routinely lift. If you have a lift, a garage, or ground-floor storage, it's fine. If your daily reality includes multiple flights of stairs, it becomes a gym membership you didn't ask for.
The City Pro is still hefty, but noticeably more manageable. You still won't enjoy carrying it far, yet lifting it into a boot or up a short set of steps is less of a near-death experience. Its folding hook system can be a tad fiddly to latch at first, but once folded it's a bit easier to wrestle into tighter spaces than the OXO, though the wide bars still demand some room.
On day-to-day practicality, the Apollo claws back a lot of points with its IP66 rating, self-healing tubeless tyres and low-maintenance drum brakes. You simply worry less about punctures, rain, or tweaking brake calipers every other weekend. The OXO is not fragile - far from it - but it asks for a bit more mechanical sympathy and planning around weather, especially if your region sees heavy downpours.
So: treat the OXO like a small motorbike you store properly, and it's wonderful. Treat the City Pro like a robust piece of urban infrastructure you occasionally have to lug, and it fits that role nicely.
Safety
Both scooters take safety seriously, just in different flavours.
The OXO's safety foundation is stability and braking. The low centre of gravity and long, planted chassis make high-speed runs feel far less sketchy than they have any right to on a scooter. Speed wobbles are largely a non-issue if your tyres are properly maintained. Those hydraulic discs give you strong, predictable stopping with minimal hand effort, even during hard emergency grabs.
Lighting is where the OXO shows its age. The built-in lights are fine for being seen, but the low-mounted front beam mostly lights up your front wheel and immediate path. For serious night riding, you'll want an extra bar-mounted headlight at eye level. It's not unsafe out of the box, but it's definitely "bring your own upgrades" territory.
The City Pro goes full modern on safety. The high-mounted headlight actually throws usable light ahead, the integrated turn signals are a genuine upgrade in traffic (not having to take a hand off the bar to indicate is huge), and the always-on, 360-degree visibility makes you feel more legitimately part of the traffic ecosystem. Add in the IP66 rating - so wet roads are less of a "shall I gamble my electronics today?" question - and it's clearly built with urban chaos in mind.
Grip wise, both run on 10-inch pneumatic tyres, but the Apollo's tubeless, self-healing setup does marginally better at shrugging off debris and maintaining pressure. The OXO still offers superb traction, but a random nail is more likely to end your day.
If we're talking raw high-speed chassis safety, the OXO's stability and braking power are hard to beat. For visibility, weather, and urban signalling, the City Pro is clearly ahead.
Community Feedback
| INOKIM OXO | APOLLO City Pro |
|---|---|
| What riders love Butter-smooth rubber suspension, planted high-speed stability, quiet motors, premium feel, long-distance comfort, strong hydraulic brakes, distinctive design and swingarms, hill-crushing power, and overall sense of mechanical quality. |
What riders love Superb regen braking feel, integrated lights and indicators, fast charging, strong hill performance for a commuter, IP66 rating, rattle-free frame, low-maintenance drums and self-healing tyres, and the polished app experience. |
| What riders complain about Sheer weight, slow stock charging, low-mounted headlight, non-folding bars, slightly slippery stock deck on older units, throttle dead zone, and occasional fender or kickstand niggles. |
What riders complain about Still heavy to carry, high price for a commuter, fiddly folding hook, rear splash protection in heavy rain, charger fan noise, and some thumb fatigue for certain riders on very long rides. |
Price & Value
The OXO is unapologetically premium. You pay noticeably more for it, and you're not getting the flashy TFT or app toys some newer competitors throw in. What you are buying is a huge battery, a seriously overbuilt frame, a suspension design that still embarrasses many newer models, and a scooter that tends to age gracefully rather than rattling itself into oblivion. If you think in terms of years and tens of thousands of kilometres, its value proposition makes a lot more sense than if you're just glancing at a spec sheet.
The City Pro undercuts it quite significantly, and packs in a lot for the money: dual motors, serious water protection, advanced regen braking, self-healing tyres, good ride quality and a very mature app. In the premium commuter bracket, it's one of the more complete packages. You sacrifice some outright performance and long-range capability versus the OXO, but you save money and gain features and convenience that many daily riders will actually use more often than raw speed.
In short: if you're an enthusiast who cares deeply about riding dynamics and build depth, the OXO justifies its higher price. If you're a practical commuter with a budget ceiling and a soft spot for modern features, the City Pro hits a sweeter value spot.
Service & Parts Availability
INOKIM has been around long enough to build a proper support and dealer network, especially in Europe. Finding tyres, brake parts or someone who's actually worked on these scooters before is usually not a heroic quest. Their scooters are also mechanically straightforward once you know your way around them, helped by the single-sided swingarms making tyre swaps dramatically less miserable than on most dual-motor machines.
Apollo, while younger, has made support part of its identity. Their documentation, remote diagnostics and willingness to ship parts are generally above average. In some European countries, though, they don't yet have quite the same footprint of long-standing brick-and-mortar partners as INOKIM. On the other hand, the City Pro's low-maintenance drums and self-healing tyres reduce how often you need hands-on service in the first place.
If you prefer walking into a local shop that's seen your model for years, the OXO currently has the edge. If you're comfortable with a mix of occasional DIY, remote support and shipping parts in, the Apollo ecosystem is perfectly workable - and steadily improving.
Pros & Cons Summary
| INOKIM OXO | APOLLO City Pro |
|---|---|
Pros
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
Cons
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | INOKIM OXO | APOLLO City Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Motor power (rated) | 2.000 W (dual 1.000 W) | 1.000 W (dual 500 W) |
| Top speed | ca. 65 km/h | ca. 51,5 km/h |
| Real-world range | ca. 50-65 km | ca. 40-50 km |
| Battery energy | ca. 1.536 Wh | ca. 960 Wh |
| Battery voltage / capacity | 60 V / 26 Ah | 48 V / 20 Ah |
| Weight | 33,5 kg | 29,5 kg |
| Brakes | Dual hydraulic discs | Dual drums + regenerative |
| Suspension | Adjustable rubber torsion front & rear | Front spring + dual rear springs |
| Tyres | 10" pneumatic (tubed) | 10" tubeless self-healing pneumatic |
| Max load | 120 kg | 120 kg |
| IP rating | IPX4 (newer batches) | IP66 |
| Charging time (stock charger) | ca. 13,5 h | ca. 4,5 h |
| Approx. price | ca. 2.744 € | ca. 1.649 € |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
If your heart beats faster at the thought of glide-smooth long rides, if you value a chassis that feels carved from billet and a ride quality that makes bad roads feel like a distant rumour, the INOKIM OXO is simply the more satisfying machine. It's the scooter you buy once and then build your commuting life around; heavy, yes, but also deeply confidence-inspiring and genuinely special to ride.
If you're a primarily urban rider looking for a feature-rich, modern commuter that handles real-world city abuse - rain, potholes, glass, and constant stop-start - the APOLLO City Pro makes a compelling case. It's kinder to your wallet, less of a brute to move around, and far better equipped out of the box in terms of connectivity, lighting and weather protection.
Put bluntly: enthusiasts, comfort junkies and long-distance riders should gravitate to the OXO; serious city commuters who live and breathe practicality and tech will be happier on the City Pro. For me, if I had to keep just one as my "main vehicle", I'd live with the weight and slow charging and take the OXO - because every time I step on it, it feels like I'm riding something engineered for the long haul, not just another upgrade cycle.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | INOKIM OXO | APOLLO City Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ❌ 1,79 €/Wh | ✅ 1,72 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ❌ 42,21 €/km/h | ✅ 32,02 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ✅ 21,82 g/Wh | ❌ 30,73 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | ✅ 0,52 kg/km/h | ❌ 0,57 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ❌ 47,73 €/km | ✅ 36,64 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ✅ 0,58 kg/km | ❌ 0,66 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ❌ 26,72 Wh/km | ✅ 21,33 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ✅ 30,77 W/km/h | ❌ 19,42 W/km/h |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | ✅ 0,0168 kg/W | ❌ 0,0295 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ❌ 113,78 W | ✅ 213,33 W |
These metrics give a cold, mathematical look at how much scooter you get per euro, per kilogram and per watt. Price-per-Wh and price-per-km show cost efficiency, while weight-per-Wh and weight-per-km/h highlight how much mass you're hauling around for the performance you get. Wh-per-km reflects energy efficiency, power-to-speed hints at how "over-powered" a scooter is for its top speed, and weight-to-power shows how hard each watt has to work. Finally, the charging speed metric simply shows how quickly each battery can be refilled in practice.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | INOKIM OXO | APOLLO City Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ❌ Very heavy to lift | ✅ Slightly lighter, less pain |
| Range | ✅ More real-world distance | ❌ Shorter mixed-mode range |
| Max Speed | ✅ Much higher top end | ❌ Urban-focused top speed |
| Power | ✅ Stronger dual motors | ❌ Less punch overall |
| Battery Size | ✅ Larger capacity pack | ❌ Smaller overall battery |
| Suspension | ✅ Plush rubber "magic carpet" | ❌ Good, but less refined |
| Design | ✅ Iconic swingarms, timeless | ✅ Sleek, modern, integrated |
| Safety | ✅ Chassis stability, hydraulics | ✅ Lights, signals, wet riding |
| Practicality | ❌ Heavy, big folded footprint | ✅ Friendlier for daily logistics |
| Comfort | ✅ Long-distance comfort king | ❌ Comfortable, but not OXO level |
| Features | ❌ Basic display, no app | ✅ App, regen, signals, IP66 |
| Serviceability | ✅ Easier tyre swaps, simple | ❌ Drums, integration complicate |
| Customer Support | ✅ Established dealer network | ✅ Very engaged, responsive |
| Fun Factor | ✅ Surf-like, fast, engaging | ❌ Fun, but more utilitarian |
| Build Quality | ✅ Tank-like, very solid | ✅ Tight, rattle-free frame |
| Component Quality | ✅ Branded cells, hydraulics | ✅ Good electronics, hardware |
| Brand Name | ✅ Long-standing premium rep | ✅ Innovative, fast-growing |
| Community | ✅ Strong, long-term fanbase | ✅ Active, engaged Apollo crowd |
| Lights (visibility) | ❌ Low, basic stock setup | ✅ Signals, bright, 360° |
| Lights (illumination) | ❌ Too low for serious night | ✅ High-mounted, road-filling |
| Acceleration | ✅ Stronger overall shove | ❌ Quicker feel, less grunt |
| Arrive with smile factor | ✅ Huge grin every ride | ❌ Satisfying, but more "tool" |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ✅ Supremely relaxing chassis | ✅ Smooth urban ride, regen |
| Charging speed | ❌ Slow stock charger | ✅ Very quick turnaround |
| Reliability | ✅ Proven platform, mature | ✅ Improved after early tweaks |
| Folded practicality | ❌ Bulky, bars don't fold | ✅ More compact, hook system |
| Ease of transport | ❌ Brutal on stairs | ✅ Heavy, but manageable |
| Handling | ✅ High-speed confidence | ✅ City agility, nimble |
| Braking performance | ✅ Strong hydraulic bite | ✅ Excellent regen + drums |
| Riding position | ✅ Spacious, multiple stances | ✅ Ergonomic, good bar height |
| Handlebar quality | ✅ Solid, flex-free | ✅ Wide, confidence-inspiring |
| Throttle response | ❌ Dead zone annoys some | ✅ Smooth, adjustable via app |
| Dashboard / Display | ❌ Simple, dated look | ✅ Modern, app-linked feel |
| Security (locking) | ❌ No smart lock features | ✅ App lock, extra options |
| Weather protection | ❌ Limited water resistance | ✅ IP66, rain-friendly |
| Resale value | ✅ Holds value very well | ✅ Strong demand, modern spec |
| Tuning potential | ✅ Popular with modders | ❌ More locked-in ecosystem |
| Ease of maintenance | ✅ Mechanical, accessible layout | ❌ Enclosed drums, integration |
| Value for Money | ❌ Pricier for most commuters | ✅ Strong package per euro |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the INOKIM OXO scores 5 points against the APOLLO City Pro's 5. In the Author's Category Battle, the INOKIM OXO gets 26 ✅ versus 27 ✅ for APOLLO City Pro (with a few ties sprinkled in).
Totals: INOKIM OXO scores 31, APOLLO City Pro scores 32.
Based on the scoring, the APOLLO City Pro is our overall winner. Between these two, the INOKIM OXO is the one that feels like a "forever scooter": deeply satisfying to ride, beautifully put together, and something you genuinely bond with every time you roll out. The APOLLO City Pro is clever, capable and very easy to recommend for serious commuters, but it never quite delivers that same sense of riding something special. If you want a machine that turns every trip into a small event and makes you look forward to the long way home, the OXO takes it. The City Pro is the smarter spreadsheet choice for many, but the OXO is the one that stays with you long after you park it.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.