Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
The INOKIM OXO is the overall winner here: it rides better, feels more solid, and is the scooter you still enjoy after thousands of kilometres, not just the first weekend. Its sublime suspension, tank-like build and long, calm range make it the better "real vehicle" for commuting and long days out.
The APOLLO Ghost 2022 fights back with a much lower price, punchier feel and folding handlebars, making it the sensible choice if budget matters more than refinement, or if you need something that fits in a small car boot.
Choose the OXO if you want premium comfort, durability and that "gliding on rails" sensation; pick the Ghost if you want maximum thrills per euro and can live with a rougher, more playful character.
If you care which of these will still make you smile in two years, keep reading - that's where the real difference appears.
Put two powerful dual-motor scooters side by side and, on paper, they start to blur into the same angry spec sheet. In practice, the INOKIM OXO and APOLLO Ghost 2022 could not feel more different. One is a refined grand tourer that happens to be fast; the other is a budget hooligan that happens to commute.
The OXO is for riders who secretly wanted a small electric motorcycle but promised themselves they'd "just get a scooter". The Ghost is for riders who got bored of rented toys and now want to catapult themselves away from traffic lights without destroying their bank account.
They sit in the same broad performance class, but they solve the daily riding puzzle in very different ways. Let's dig into where each shines, where each stumbles, and which one actually fits your life.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
Both scooters live in that spicy mid-to-upper performance tier: serious dual motors, real suspension, real brakes, speeds that make cycle lanes... contentious. They're the next step up once you've outgrown the Lime-style rentals and vanilla commuters.
The INOKIM OXO is a premium "grand tourer" - priced like a mid-range e-bike, engineered like a small vehicle. It targets riders who want to replace a lot of car trips, ride far, and stay comfortable doing it.
The APOLLO Ghost 2022 is the classic value performance scooter - you get most of the thrills of the big boys at a price that doesn't trigger a family meeting. It's the accessible gateway into the fast-scooter world.
They overlap in power and speed, both can flatten hills, both will get you stern looks from pedestrians. You're likely cross-shopping them if you want a fast, full-suspension scooter that feels like more than a toy but don't want to dive straight into hyper-scooter territory.
Design & Build Quality
Pick up the OXO (or try to) and the first impression is industrial sculpture. The chassis is a fully custom, aviation-grade aluminium frame with that signature single-sided swingarm. No generic tubes, no spaghetti wiring, just a cohesive design that clearly comes from a single engineering brain rather than a parts catalogue.
The finish is excellent: paint is thick, tolerances are tight, and even after long, rattly city use it tends to stay quiet. The adjustable rubber torsion suspension is integrated into the frame, not bolted on as an afterthought. It feels like a product that was designed, then refined, then refined again.
The Ghost, by contrast, wears its "performance on a budget" philosophy proudly. The skeletonised swingarms, visible springs and deck lighting give it a raw, industrial vibe. It looks fast even standing still, and many riders love that. Build quality is good for the price: forged aluminium, decently tidy cabling, and a stem clamp that's worlds better than the wobble-fest you see on bargain scooters.
Where they differ is cohesion. On the Ghost you can see the modularity - common display, common trigger throttle, generic but effective suspension units. It's a smartly assembled platform rather than a ground-up bespoke machine. The OXO feels like something you'd see in a design museum; the Ghost feels like something you'd see in a tuning shop. Both valid, but not the same league.
Ride Comfort & Handling
This is where the OXO quietly walks away with your heart. That rubber torsion suspension is the stuff of legend for a reason. Over broken tarmac, patchy repairs and cobblestones, the OXO doesn't just soften the hits - it smooths the whole ride into a controlled, damped float. You can do a long urban loop, hit every nasty shortcut you know, and step off feeling... fine. Not young again, but definitely not smashed to bits.
The wide, long deck lets you move your feet around and adopt a proper, athletic stance. Combined with the low centre of gravity and long wheelbase, you get the feeling of carving on rails rather than bouncing on a pogo stick. It's the one scooter in this class where I consistently arrive more relaxed than when I set off.
The Ghost is comfortable - especially compared to cheap commuters - but it's more "sporty hatchback" than "luxury SUV". The dual spring suspension has decent travel and takes the sting out of potholes, but you feel more of the road surface. After a few kilometres of chewed-up pavement you're still okay, but your knees know they've been working.
Handling on the Ghost is sharp and playful. It loves quick direction changes and feels eager to flick through traffic. At high speed, it's stable enough, but you're more conscious of inputs; it demands a bit more rider attention than the rock-solid OXO. If you enjoy that slightly lively, rally-car character, it's fun. If you want set-and-forget calmness at speed, the OXO is in another class.
Performance
On paper, they trade blows: both run dual motors in roughly the same power bracket, both cruise at frankly antisocial speeds, and both demolish hills like they're not there.
The OXO delivers its shove like a smooth, relentless wave. In full power it pulls hard enough to make you grin, but the throttle mapping is deliberately progressive. You roll on, the motors wake up, and the scooter just keeps building speed with a jet-take-off feel. There's a slight "dead zone" at the start of the throttle that some adrenaline addicts complain about, but for daily riding it keeps things civil and predictable, especially on wet or dusty surfaces.
The Ghost, on the other hand, is all about that initial punch. Click into dual-motor turbo, squeeze the trigger, and it lunges forward like it's trying to leave your shoes behind. That square-wave controller hit gives it a rowdy personality: brilliant for short bursts and carving through urban gaps, a bit less refined if you're trying to accelerate smoothly past pedestrians.
At the top end, both reach speeds that are honestly more limited by common sense (and local law) than by the scooter. The OXO feels planted and composed as the numbers climb - the sensation is almost boringly competent, in a good way. The Ghost remains stable but a little more twitchy; wind, road imperfections and small steering inputs are more noticeable. Braking on both is excellent thanks to hydraulic discs, with the OXO feeling slightly more progressive and the Ghost getting a big assist from adjustable regenerative braking if you dial it in correctly.
Hill climbing is essentially a non-issue on either. Steep urban inclines that make single-motor scooters whimper are dispatched with dismissive ease. The difference is character: the Ghost sprints up like it has a point to prove; the OXO just cruises up like it didn't notice there was a hill.
Battery & Range
The OXO carries a proper touring battery - a big, high-voltage pack built from branded cells. In the real world, ridden enthusiastically but not suicidally, it happily covers longer commutes and weekend detours without you obsessively staring at the bars. You can use its performance, take the scenic route, and still get home with a comfortable buffer.
That big pack comes with a catch: charging with the stock brick takes most of a day. It's very much an overnight job unless you invest in a faster charger. The upside is that OXO owners tend to treat it like a vehicle: ride hard, park, plug, forget until morning.
The Ghost's battery is smaller, and you feel that. In spirited dual-motor riding, its real-world range is solid for normal commuting but not spectacular. For city hops, fun blasts and medium commutes it's fine; for long all-day rides you either slow down or you plan your route around electrons. The dual charge ports are a nice touch - buy a second charger and you can actually recover a meaningful amount of range over a lunch break.
Efficiency wise, the OXO's calmer delivery and higher-capacity pack mean it shrugs off heavy riders and hills a bit better. The Ghost rewards restraint: ride it like a grown-up and it does decently, ride it like a YouTube thumbnail and you'll be meeting the charger earlier than you'd like.
Portability & Practicality
Let's be blunt: neither of these is a "tuck under your arm for the metro" scooter. But they play different roles on the practicality spectrum.
The OXO is heavy in a very "this is a small vehicle" way. You can fold it quickly, but the handlebars don't collapse, and the bulk is very noticeable. Carrying it up multiple flights of stairs is a once-only experiment. If you have ground-floor storage, a lift, or a garage, it's perfect. If your daily routine involves trains and stairs, it's the wrong tool.
The Ghost is lighter and, crucially, has folding handlebars. That alone makes it far easier to slot into a car boot, tuck into a hallway, or stash under a desk. Thirty seconds of folding and you have something that, while not exactly dainty, is manageable for most adults to lift short distances. It's still not what I'd call "portable", but it crosses the line into "reasonable compromise".
In day-to-day use, the OXO's size feels justified because it rides like a much bigger, more stable machine. The Ghost trades a bit of that long-distance serenity for easier storage and slightly less hassle moving it around. Ask yourself which pain you prefer: carrying a heavier sculpture, or riding a slightly less refined one.
Safety
Both scooters tick the big safety boxes: serious brakes, real tyres, suspension that actually works, and lighting that goes beyond a single sad LED trying to do its best.
The OXO leans heavily on stability. The low centre of gravity and geometry give it a wonderfully planted feel at any sensible speed. Speed wobbles are notably absent if you keep your bearings in order. Its hydraulic discs are strong but nicely modulatable, letting you scrub off a bit of speed or haul it down hard without drama. The only real miss is the low-mounted front light - great for illuminating the road right in front, not amazing for being seen from far away. Many owners add a high-mounted bar light and call it a day.
The Ghost brings a bit more theatre to safety. The hydraulic brakes bite hard, and the adjustable regen can genuinely reduce your reliance on the physical brakes if you configure it properly. Out of the box, that regen can feel like someone grabbing your wheel - it needs a few minutes in the settings menu to stop scaring you. Lighting is flashier and more conspicuous: deck and stem LEDs make you glow from the sides, and the brake-responsive rear lights are genuinely helpful in traffic.
Tyre grip is comparable: both run decent pneumatic tyres with enough contact patch to lean confidently, as long as you respect wet surfaces. At the limit, the OXO gives you a bit more confidence purely because the chassis is so composed; the Ghost will do what you ask, but you're more aware that you're near the edge.
Community Feedback
| INOKIM OXO | APOLLO Ghost 2022 |
|---|---|
| What riders love | What riders love |
|
|
| What riders complain about | What riders complain about |
|
|
Price & Value
This is the Ghost's best argument and the OXO's biggest hurdle.
The Ghost sits in that sweet spot where you get serious dual-motor performance, proper suspension and hydraulic brakes for what many people would otherwise blow on a nice phone and a weekend away. For the money, it's very hard to argue with the level of fun and capability on offer. If your budget is capped and you want maximum speed and torque per euro, this is exactly why the Ghost is so popular.
The OXO costs a lot more - you're firmly into premium territory here. But you're also paying for a different class of product: bespoke frame, high-end battery cells, unique suspension, and a brand that builds from the ground up rather than optimising a common platform. Over years of use, that translates into fewer rattles, less drama, and a scooter that still feels "tight" five thousand kilometres later.
So: if your wallet is the main decision-maker, the Ghost is the obvious winner. If you view this as buying a long-term vehicle rather than a toy, the OXO starts to look like better value despite the sticker shock.
Service & Parts Availability
INOKIM has been around a long time and behaves like an old-school hardware brand: dealer networks, physical service centres, and a healthy supply of genuine parts. In Europe especially, it's relatively easy to find a shop that actually knows the OXO inside-out. That matters when you're staring at a worn swingarm bushing or a tired brake line rather than just a flat tyre.
APOLLO, while younger, has invested heavily in support and is generally regarded as one of the better direct-to-consumer brands to deal with. They have structured warranty processes, decent documentation and are active in the community. Parts for the Ghost - both official and aftermarket - are widely available, and plenty of generic components fit.
The difference is subtle but real. With the OXO, you're dealing with a mature, globally established platform that shops already know how to service. With the Ghost, you're more likely to be shipping parts or tinkering yourself - which for some owners is half the fun, but it's a factor if you're not mechanically inclined.
Pros & Cons Summary
| INOKIM OXO | APOLLO Ghost 2022 |
|---|---|
Pros
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
Cons
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | INOKIM OXO | APOLLO Ghost 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Motor power (nominal) | 2.000 W (dual 1.000 W) | 2.000 W (dual 1.000 W) |
| Top speed | ≈ 65 km/h | ≈ 58-60 km/h |
| Battery energy | 1.536 Wh (60 V, 25,6-26 Ah) | 947 Wh (52 V, 18,2 Ah) |
| Claimed range | 80-110 km | 40-90 km |
| Real-world range (mixed) | ≈ 50-65 km | ≈ 40-50 km |
| Weight | 33,5 kg | 29 kg |
| Brakes | Dual hydraulic disc | Dual hydraulic disc + regen |
| Suspension | Adjustable rubber torsion front & rear | C-shaped front / dual rear springs |
| Tyres | 10" pneumatic | 10" pneumatic |
| Max load | 120 kg | 136 kg |
| Water resistance | IPX4 (newer batches) | IP54 |
| Approx. price | 2.744 € | 1.694 € |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
If you strip away the spec sheets and just think about living with these scooters, the roles become very clear.
The INOKIM OXO is the better choice for riders who see their scooter as a daily vehicle, not a weekend toy. If you want to ride longer distances in real comfort, in all sorts of conditions, and you care about engineering quality and long-term durability, the OXO simply feels like a more mature, more complete machine. It's calmer, more planted, and more relaxing to ride fast - you get home tired from the day, not from fighting the scooter.
The APOLLO Ghost 2022 is ideal if your budget is tighter, your rides are shorter, and you prioritise fun per euro over absolute refinement. It's a riot off the line, folds more conveniently, and gives you a big taste of the high-performance experience without demanding high-performance money. For many riders, especially as a first "serious" scooter, that makes a lot of sense.
But if you ask which one I'd want under me on a long, mixed-terrain ride after a long week - the one that still feels special a year later - that honour goes to the INOKIM OXO.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | INOKIM OXO | APOLLO Ghost 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | Price per Wh (€/Wh)✅ 1,79 €/Wh | ✅ 1,79 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ❌ 42,22 €/km/h | ✅ 28,23 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ✅ 21,81 g/Wh | ❌ 30,62 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | ❌ 0,52 kg/km/h | ✅ 0,48 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ❌ 47,74 €/km | ✅ 37,64 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ✅ 0,58 kg/km | ❌ 0,64 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ❌ 26,71 Wh/km | ✅ 21,04 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ❌ 30,77 W/km/h | ✅ 33,33 W/km/h |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | ❌ 0,01675 kg/W | ✅ 0,0145 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ✅ 113,78 W | ❌ 78,92 W |
These metrics put hard numbers on different aspects of efficiency and value. Price per Wh and per km/h tell you how much energy capacity or speed you buy for each euro. Weight-based metrics show how much mass you haul around for each unit of performance or range. Wh per km reflects energy efficiency while riding. Power-to-speed and weight-to-power illustrate how aggressively a scooter is tuned relative to its top speed and mass. Finally, average charging speed tells you how quickly a flat battery becomes a usable one again.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | INOKIM OXO | APOLLO Ghost 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ❌ Noticeably heavier to move | ✅ Lighter, easier to handle |
| Range | ✅ Longer real-world distance | ❌ Needs charging sooner |
| Max Speed | ✅ Slightly higher ceiling | ❌ Just behind on top |
| Power | ✅ Smooth but very strong | ❌ Punchy yet similar output |
| Battery Size | ✅ Much larger pack | ❌ Smaller capacity |
| Suspension | ✅ Plush rubber torsion magic | ❌ Good but more basic |
| Design | ✅ Cohesive, iconic, refined | ❌ Industrial, less integrated |
| Safety | ✅ More stable, predictable | ❌ Safe but livelier |
| Practicality | ❌ Harder to store, carry | ✅ Folding bars, easier fit |
| Comfort | ✅ Class-leading ride comfort | ❌ Comfortable, not exceptional |
| Features | ❌ Simpler, minimal extras | ✅ Lights, regen, dual ports |
| Serviceability | ✅ Single-arm, proven platform | ❌ More fiddly tyres, mods |
| Customer Support | ✅ Strong dealer presence | ✅ Active, responsive brand |
| Fun Factor | ✅ Surf-like, addictive glide | ✅ Hooligan torque, playful |
| Build Quality | ✅ More premium, fewer rattles | ❌ Good but less refined |
| Component Quality | ✅ Higher-end cells, hardware | ❌ More cost-optimised parts |
| Brand Name | ✅ Long-standing, design-led | ✅ Young but respected |
| Community | ✅ Strong, long-term base | ✅ Very active mod crowd |
| Lights (visibility) | ❌ Functional but modest | ✅ Bright deck and stem |
| Lights (illumination) | ❌ Low, needs bar light | ❌ Adequate, still upgradeable |
| Acceleration | ❌ Strong but more gentle | ✅ Sharper, more explosive |
| Arrive with smile factor | ✅ Smooth, satisfying glide | ✅ Adrenaline, silly grins |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ✅ Calm, low fatigue | ❌ Engaging, more tiring |
| Charging speed | ✅ Faster per Wh | ❌ Slower for capacity |
| Reliability | ✅ Mature, proven platform | ❌ More reports of quirks |
| Folded practicality | ❌ Bulky, wide bars | ✅ Compact with folding bars |
| Ease of transport | ❌ Heavy, awkward on stairs | ✅ Manageable for short carries |
| Handling | ✅ Stable, confidence-inspiring | ❌ Nimbler but twitchier |
| Braking performance | ✅ Strong, very progressive | ✅ Strong, regen assist |
| Riding position | ✅ Wide, roomy, natural | ✅ Spacious deck, kickplate |
| Handlebar quality | ✅ Solid, zero noticeable flex | ❌ Folding adds some play |
| Throttle response | ❌ Dead zone irritates some | ✅ Immediate, adjustable aggression |
| Dashboard / Display | ❌ Basic, no frills | ✅ Standard, more info |
| Security (locking) | ❌ No integrated immobiliser | ✅ Keyed voltage lock |
| Weather protection | ✅ Decent IPX4 rating | ✅ IP54, comparable |
| Resale value | ✅ Holds value strongly | ❌ Depreciates a bit faster |
| Tuning potential | ❌ Less commonly modded | ✅ Huge modding ecosystem |
| Ease of maintenance | ✅ Single arm eases tyre work | ❌ Conventional, more labour |
| Value for Money | ❌ Premium pricing | ✅ Strong performance per euro |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the INOKIM OXO scores 4 points against the APOLLO Ghost 2022's 7. In the Author's Category Battle, the INOKIM OXO gets 26 ✅ versus 20 ✅ for APOLLO Ghost 2022 (with a few ties sprinkled in).
Totals: INOKIM OXO scores 30, APOLLO Ghost 2022 scores 27.
Based on the scoring, the INOKIM OXO is our overall winner. Between these two, the INOKIM OXO simply feels like the more grown-up companion: it rides better, feels more substantial, and turns everyday trips into something quietly satisfying rather than constantly hectic. The APOLLO Ghost 2022 absolutely has its charm - especially if your inner teenager wants to win every traffic-light sprint - but it can't quite match the OXO's blend of comfort, stability and polish. If you want a scooter that still feels special and solid after countless rough kilometres, the OXO is the one that will keep you coming back for "just one more ride".
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.

