Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
The INOKIM OXO is the overall winner: it rides better, feels more solid, and behaves like a serious vehicle you can trust day in, day out, not just a weekend rocket. It's the choice for riders who value stability, comfort, long-term durability and proper brand support over chasing the highest top-speed figure for the lowest price.
The LAOTIE ES10P is for thrill-seekers on a tight budget who don't mind grabbing the tool kit regularly and living with rough edges in exchange for huge power and range per euro. If you're mechanically inclined and want maximum performance for minimum money, it's an undeniably tempting toy-turned-vehicle.
If you care more about how the scooter feels after the first 2.000 km than how it looks on a product page, keep reading - the details matter a lot here.
There's a particular kind of grin you get from a fast electric scooter - that slightly guilty, "I definitely shouldn't be going this fast on something with a skateboard deck" grin. Both the INOKIM OXO and the LAOTIE ES10P deliver that grin. They just go about it in very different ways.
On one side you have the OXO, the "land surfer" grand tourer: sculpted aluminium, beautifully tuned rubber suspension, near-silent motors and the sort of high-speed stability that makes you forget you're technically standing on a plank. It's for people who think of a scooter as a daily vehicle, not a disposable toy.
On the other, the ES10P - the budget hyper-scooter that stuffs muscle-car specs into a mail-order chassis. It's fast, it's loud, it's hilariously powerful for the money, and it expects you to be part rider, part mechanic.
If you're trying to decide whether to buy the polished long-term partner or the wild weekend fling, the rest of this comparison will help you choose with a clear conscience.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
Both scooters sit in that "serious performance" bracket - dual motors, real hill-climbing ability, proper suspension, and speeds that move you out of the bicycle lane and into "I should wear armour for this" territory. Yet their pricing lives on different planets: the OXO is a premium purchase, the ES10P a budget brawler.
They compete because, on paper, they seem almost interchangeable: dual motors around the same rated output, big batteries, long claimed ranges, similar weights, similar maximum rider loads. To someone scrolling product pages, it's an obvious question: "Why would I pay several times more for the OXO when the LAOTIE promises even higher speed and a bigger battery for a fraction of the price?"
This comparison is for riders who:
- Want real performance, not a mild commuter toy
- Are prepared to live with a heavy scooter
- Are choosing between polished refinement and price-per-spec insanity
On spec sheets, the ES10P shouts louder. On real roads, the conversation gets much more interesting.
Design & Build Quality
Standing next to each other, the design philosophies are almost comically different.
The INOKIM OXO feels like a product that was designed, not assembled. The frame is a chunky, sculpted aluminium extrusion with beautifully integrated swingarms, neat cable routing and almost no visual clutter. The single-sided arms are not just striking to look at; they also make tyre work easier. The finish is clean, with paint and tolerances that remind you someone in Tel Aviv cared deeply about how this thing will look after years of use, not just in the studio shots.
The LAOTIE ES10P, by contrast, is unapologetically industrial. The frame is a mix of iron and aluminium, bolts are very much on show, and cables run externally in good old-fashioned looms. It looks tough, but it also looks like what it is: a generic high-power platform that's been spec'd up. The fit and finish simply don't live in the same universe as the OXO. You'll find more sharp edges, more minor rattles, more parts that need a dab of thread-locker to stop them trying to escape.
In the hands, the OXO feels dense and cohesive - like a single piece of engineering. The stem locks up with very little play; the deck, while plastic-topped, feels structurally solid and well supported. On the ES10P, you're more aware of assemblies: stem clamp here, bolt stack there, suspension eyelets that rely heavily on proper tightening. It's not that it's made of cheese; it's just built to a cost, and you can tell.
Visually, the OXO projects "premium vehicle, please park me next to a Tesla." The ES10P says "I was delivered in a box and I am absolutely fine with that." Neither is pretending to be something it's not, but one is clearly built to age gracefully, the other to deliver maximum hardware for the money.
Ride Comfort & Handling
This is where the OXO starts to earn its premium in a very obvious way.
The OXO's rubber torsion suspension is the star of the show. It filters out road chatter in a way coils simply don't. On long stretches of ugly city paving - expansion joints, patch repairs, sizzling cobblestones - the OXO stays composed. Your knees and wrists aren't working overtime to compensate; the scooter itself is doing the hard labour. The wide deck lets you shift stance, lean into turns and brace under braking without feeling cramped, and the geometry just feels "sorted" - predictable turn-in, no nervousness.
The LAOTIE ES10P's twin spring suspension is... effective, in context. It takes the edge off potholes and kerbs, and the fat pneumatic tyres do a lot of the heavy lifting. But springs without sophisticated damping tend to bounce. On fast sections of broken tarmac, the ES10P can start to feel a little pogo-stick-ish, especially at the rear. You can ride around this with experience - soft knees, weight shifts - but it's more work, and you feel more vertical movement through your body.
In carving and cornering, the OXO inspires more confidence. You can really lean into it; it compresses, grips and tracks the line. The ES10P's off-road tyres and looser overall feel mean that at higher lean angles you're more conscious of tread squirm and the scooter's mass wanting to stand back up. It's fine in sensible riding, but if you push, the OXO feels like a refined longboard; the ES10P feels more like a modified shopping trolley that's been given suspension and a gym membership.
After a long ride, the difference is stark. On the OXO, you step off feeling like you've glided. On the ES10P, you've had fun - but you'll know you've been wrestling with an energetic machine.
Performance
Both scooters are quick enough that you start thinking about motorcycle jackets rather than hoodies.
The INOKIM OXO delivers its power with a very deliberate smoothness. In dual-motor "Turbo" mode it pulls strongly, and it absolutely gets up to genuinely silly speeds, but the acceleration curve is progressive. It feels like a strong electric motorcycle in eco mode - quick, but not out to rip your arms off. There is a slight dead zone at the start of the thumb throttle that tames low-speed jerkiness and makes urban riding civilised. Some hardcore speed addicts find this frustrating; for everyone else, it's part of why the OXO feels so controlled.
The LAOTIE ES10P is the opposite: no one would accuse it of being too polite. Switch to dual motor and the aggressive mode, and the scooter lunges forward. The square-wave controllers give that slightly raw, stepped surge, accompanied by the trademark electronic whine. On loose ground, the front can hunt for grip when you hammer it. It's genuinely exciting - the kind of acceleration that makes first-time riders squeal and then immediately want another go. Hill starts become comedy: where commuter scooters groan to a crawl, the ES10P just flings itself uphill.
Top speed bragging rights technically go to the LAOTIE - in good conditions, it'll edge beyond the OXO at full chat. But here's the important bit: cruising speeds are more meaningful than the theoretical peak. Both will happily sit at car-like city speeds. The OXO just feels more planted when it does so. The ES10P can develop a bit of speed wobble if your stem clamp isn't perfectly dialled or your stance is lazy, and that's not an experience you particularly want at those velocities.
Braking performance is strong on both, with hydraulic discs on each wheel. The OXO's system feels more refined in modulation - progressive, predictable, good feedback. On the ES10P, you also have electronic braking that kicks in, which helps slow you down but can feel a little abrupt until you're used to it. At serious speeds, I'd rather have the OXO's calmer, confidence-inspiring behaviour, even if the ES10P technically throws more assistance at the problem.
Battery & Range
On paper, the ES10P's battery capacity looks a touch larger than the OXO's, and its claimed range numbers are suitably heroic. In the real world, when ridden the way people actually ride fast dual-motor scooters - which is to say, with enthusiasm - both end up in a similar "you can cross a big city and come back without sweating the battery" category.
The OXO, with its high-quality cells and efficient tuning, is impressively consistent. Ride hard, and you still get a solid, reliable chunk of distance before you're limping home in eco mode. It's not the most frugal scooter ever built - it's pushing a heavy chassis with big motors - but it feels honest. The gauge drains at a rate that quickly becomes predictable, and that predictability is underrated when you've got a long detour ahead.
The ES10P, thanks to its big pack and slightly lower system voltage, can also deliver long real-world distances, particularly if you're disciplined with modes and don't sit pinned at top speed on every straight. Push it hard in turbo dual-motor mode and the battery drops in hearty gulps rather than polite sips, but given the price, the amount of real-world riding you can squeeze out of a charge is genuinely impressive.
Charging is where their differences show. The OXO's huge, high-quality pack paired with a conservative standard charger means a full refill is very much an overnight affair - a long one. Many owners simply treat it like a car: plug in at the end of the day, unplug the next morning. The ES10P, with its smaller voltage and faster quoted times, turns around quicker, making it slightly more forgiving if you forget to charge one night. However, once you've lived with either for a while, you tend to fall into a rhythm and range anxiety largely disappears - unless you're trying to do multi-city touring in one go.
Portability & Practicality
Let's get this out of the way: neither of these is a "pop under your arm and onto the metro" scooter. They're both heavy, both chunky, and both firmly in the "vehicle, not accessory" camp.
The INOKIM OXO is heavy enough that you don't casually deadlift it up a staircase for fun. The folding mechanism is quick and very robust, but the non-folding handlebars mean the folded package is still wide and awkward in narrow spaces. If you have an elevator or ground-floor storage, it's fine; if your life involves daily staircases, you'll learn some new swear words. That said, everything about its practicality on the road is polished: stable kickstand, sensible deck clearance, a riding position that works for long commutes, and a general sense that this was designed to be used daily in a city.
The LAOTIE ES10P is marginally lighter on paper, but in the arms it doesn't feel meaningfully easier. The upside is that its handlebars do fold, and the stem collapses into a more compact, trunk-friendly shape. For car transport, the ES10P is actually easier to live with. Around the home, it fits into smaller gaps than the OXO. But daily handling still reminds you that you're moving a hefty bit of metal - lifting it regularly is not something you volunteer for.
In pure commuting practicality, the OXO's refined ride and better-sorted ergonomics make every kilometre feel calmer and more predictable. The ES10P's practicality is more "I can go far and fast and throw it in a car", but you pay a little in daily faff with bolts, adjustments and occasional tinkering.
Safety
Safety is much more than just brakes, and both scooters illustrate that nicely.
The OXO builds safety into the chassis itself. High-speed stability is excellent; the steering is responsive without being twitchy, and the low centre of gravity from that under-deck battery makes it feel planted. It's remarkably resistant to the classic "speed wobble" that plagues lesser designs. Hydraulic discs give strong, predictable stopping, and the overall refinement of the throttle mapping means fewer unintentional surges when you're trying to creep around pedestrians. Visibility is decent but not outstanding: the deck-mounted front lighting helps you see the road ahead but doesn't do as much to put light at driver eye-level, so most responsible owners add a bar-mounted lamp.
The ES10P, in contrast, goes all-in on being seen. Headlight, tail light, side LEDs, indicators - at night you look like a rolling sci-fi prop, which is no bad thing in traffic. Braking is powerful, with hydraulic calipers plus electronic assistance that scrubs speed quickly. Where it falls behind the OXO is in composure. At high speeds, especially if the folding mechanism isn't absolutely dialled, wobble can creep in. The suspension's bouncier character also means more pitch under braking and acceleration, which you have to adapt to. It's perfectly rideable and can be safe if you respect it, but the safety margin feels thinner when everything is happening quickly.
Weather protection is a bit of a soft point for the ES10P; out of the box, it's not something you confidently throw into heavy rain, and many owners resort to DIY sealing. The OXO's official water resistance rating and better sealing give more peace of mind in typical drizzle, though I'd still avoid monsoon heroics on either.
Community Feedback
| INOKIM OXO | LAOTIE ES10P |
|---|---|
What riders love
|
What riders love
|
What riders complain about
|
What riders complain about
|
Price & Value
This is where many people start, and often where they get stuck.
The LAOTIE ES10P is, in blunt terms, a bargain. For less than what many brands charge for a mid-tier commuter, you get dual motors, a large battery, hydraulic brakes and real high-speed capability. On a euros-per-watt-hour or euros-per-km/h basis, it absolutely hammers the OXO. If you're comfortable turning a spanner, the value is outstanding.
The OXO, on the other hand, asks you to pay a premium that won't make sense if you only look at numbers on a spec list. Its value lies in the parts you can't summarise in a single line item: tolerances, geometry, quality control, after-sales support, the choice of branded cells, the fact that it doesn't slowly rattle itself into madness after a few months. Over several years of use - and these scooters do rack up years - that difference in build and brand infrastructure starts to look less like "overpaying" and more like "paying upfront instead of in repairs and replacements".
If you're purely chasing numbers on a budget, the ES10P wins hands down. If you're thinking like someone buying a daily vehicle to live with for many seasons, the OXO's value story becomes much more compelling.
Service & Parts Availability
Service is often the hidden line in the budget vs premium equation.
INOKIM has a mature dealer and service network across much of Europe, with real shops, real humans, and real access to official parts. Need a new brake lever, a swingarm bushing, or a battery check? You can often get it done locally. That support ecosystem is part of what you're paying for. The OXO is not an anonymous factory frame; parts are specific, and they remain available.
LAOTIE, in contrast, is very much a factory-direct, platform-based brand. Parts are cheap and widely available in the generic Chinese ecosystem - controllers, displays, brake sets, suspension bits - but you're usually sourcing them online and either doing the work yourself or convincing a local bike/scooter shop to help. Warranty is typically handled by the retailer via shipping you components, not by taking the whole scooter in for a health check. For tinkerers, that's acceptable. For riders who just want a sorted machine with someone to call when it squeaks, it's a notable drawback.
Pros & Cons Summary
| INOKIM OXO | LAOTIE ES10P |
|---|---|
Pros
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
Cons
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | INOKIM OXO | LAOTIE ES10P |
|---|---|---|
| Motor power (rated) | 2 x 1.000 W hub motors | 2 x 1.000 W hub motors |
| Top speed | ≈ 65 km/h | ≈ 70 km/h |
| Claimed range | ≈ 80-110 km | ≈ 80-100 km |
| Real-world range (spirited riding) | ≈ 50-65 km | ≈ 50-60 km |
| Battery voltage | 60 V | ≈ 52 V |
| Battery capacity | ≈ 25,6-26 Ah | 28,8 Ah |
| Battery energy | ≈ 1.536 Wh | ≈ 1.490 Wh |
| Charging time (standard) | ≈ 13,5 h | ≈ 5-8 h |
| Weight | 33,5 kg | 32 kg |
| Max rider load | 120 kg | 120 kg (frame tested higher) |
| Brakes | Front & rear hydraulic discs | Front & rear hydraulic discs + EABS |
| Suspension | Adjustable rubber torsion front & rear | Spring suspension front & rear |
| Tyres | 10-inch pneumatic road tyres | 10-inch pneumatic off-road tyres |
| IP rating | IPX4 (newer models) | Not officially rated / basic sealing |
| Approx. price | 2.744 € | 889 € |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
Choosing between these two is really choosing between ownership philosophies.
The INOKIM OXO is the scooter you buy if you want something that simply behaves like a mature, well-engineered vehicle. It's the long-distance grand tourer of the e-scooter world: incredibly comfortable, impressively stable at speed, quiet, and backed by a brand that will still be around when you need a spare part in a few years. You pay a serious amount up front, but you get a calmer brain and a smoother body in return. If your scooter is going to replace a car for urban trips, commute daily and rack up thousands of kilometres, this is the one that will keep treating you kindly.
The LAOTIE ES10P is the mad value proposition for people who look at spec sheets the way others look at sports car brochures. It is rowdy, brutally effective at turning electrons into speed, and astonishingly capable for the money. But it asks more of you: more patience, more mechanical sympathy, more willingness to accept that some days you're riding, and some days you're tightening and tweaking. As a weekend thrill machine or a budget gateway into the hyper-scooter world, it makes perfect sense - especially if you enjoy the tinkering as much as the riding.
If I had to live with just one of them as my main transport, I'd take the INOKIM OXO without hesitation. It's simply the more complete, grown-up package. The LAOTIE ES10P, though, remains a guilty pleasure: slightly wild, occasionally demanding, but undeniably fun for the money.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | INOKIM OXO | LAOTIE ES10P |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ❌ 1,79 €/Wh | ✅ 0,60 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ❌ 42,21 €/km/h | ✅ 12,70 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ❌ 21,82 g/Wh | ✅ 21,48 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | ❌ 0,52 kg/km/h | ✅ 0,46 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ❌ 47,72 €/km | ✅ 16,16 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ✅ 0,58 kg/km | ✅ 0,58 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ✅ 26,72 Wh/km | ❌ 27,09 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ✅ 30,77 W/km/h | ❌ 28,57 W/km/h |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | ❌ 0,0168 kg/W | ✅ 0,0160 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ❌ 113,78 W | ✅ 186,25 W |
These metrics strip away emotion and look purely at how much "stuff" you get for your money, and how efficiently each scooter turns weight, power and battery into speed and distance. Lower values usually mean better efficiency or value, except where more power per speed or faster charging clearly benefits the rider. Unsurprisingly, the ES10P dominates the cost-based metrics, while the OXO edges ahead in pure electrical efficiency and how much power it brings to bear for its top speed.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | INOKIM OXO | LAOTIE ES10P |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ❌ Slightly heavier overall | ✅ Marginally lighter to lift |
| Range | ✅ Very solid, consistent | ❌ Strong but less predictable |
| Max Speed | ❌ Slightly lower peak | ✅ Higher top-end rush |
| Power | ✅ Smooth, controllable shove | ❌ Brutal but less refined |
| Battery Size | ✅ Higher voltage, robust pack | ❌ Slightly lower total energy |
| Suspension | ✅ Plush rubber, well tuned | ❌ Bouncy basic springs |
| Design | ✅ Refined, integrated, iconic | ❌ Functional, generic, busy |
| Safety | ✅ Very stable, predictable | ❌ More wobble risk |
| Practicality | ✅ Better everyday ride manners | ❌ More tinkering, less polished |
| Comfort | ✅ Class-leading ride comfort | ❌ Decent, but more fatigue |
| Features | ❌ Simpler, no fancy display | ✅ Key, voltmeter, colour screen |
| Serviceability | ✅ Designed, supported parts | ❌ Generic ecosystem, DIY heavy |
| Customer Support | ✅ Established dealer network | ❌ Retailer-level, slower help |
| Fun Factor | ✅ Carve, glide, enjoy daily | ✅ Wild acceleration thrills |
| Build Quality | ✅ Tight, low rattle, premium | ❌ Rough edges, more looseness |
| Component Quality | ✅ Branded cells, solid hardware | ❌ Mixed, more variability |
| Brand Name | ✅ Established, respected globally | ❌ Niche, budget reputation |
| Community | ✅ Strong, long-standing user base | ✅ Active modding, DIY crowd |
| Lights (visibility) | ❌ Needs extra up front | ✅ Very visible, flashy |
| Lights (illumination) | ❌ Low-mounted, modest beam | ✅ Brighter, better coverage |
| Acceleration | ❌ Strong but measured | ✅ Hard-hitting, brutal |
| Arrive with smile factor | ✅ Smooth, satisfying grin | ✅ Adrenaline-fuelled grin |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ✅ Very relaxed, low fatigue | ❌ More tense, more effort |
| Charging speed | ❌ Slow with stock charger | ✅ Noticeably faster refill |
| Reliability | ✅ Proven, fewer issues | ❌ Bolt checks, QC quirks |
| Folded practicality | ❌ Wide, no folding bar | ✅ Narrower, folds smaller |
| Ease of transport | ❌ Awkward bulk | ✅ Slightly easier in cars |
| Handling | ✅ Composed, precise carving | ❌ Cruder, more nervous |
| Braking performance | ✅ Strong, very controllable | ✅ Strong, extra electronic help |
| Riding position | ✅ Spacious, natural stance | ❌ Less refined ergonomics |
| Handlebar quality | ✅ Solid, low flex | ❌ More play, fold joints |
| Throttle response | ✅ Smooth, predictable curve | ❌ Jerky in aggressive modes |
| Dashboard / Display | ❌ Simple, dated readout | ✅ Colour display, voltmeter |
| Security (locking) | ❌ No built-in immobiliser | ✅ Key ignition as deterrent |
| Weather protection | ✅ Rated splash resistance | ❌ Needs DIY sealing |
| Resale value | ✅ Holds value well | ❌ Lower, more disposable |
| Tuning potential | ❌ Less mod-centric platform | ✅ Popular for heavy mods |
| Ease of maintenance | ✅ Thoughtful design, swingarms | ❌ Needs frequent checks |
| Value for Money | ❌ Premium pricing, softer on specs | ✅ Outstanding performance per euro |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the INOKIM OXO scores 3 points against the LAOTIE ES10P's 8. In the Author's Category Battle, the INOKIM OXO gets 26 ✅ versus 17 ✅ for LAOTIE ES10P (with a few ties sprinkled in).
Totals: INOKIM OXO scores 29, LAOTIE ES10P scores 25.
Based on the scoring, the INOKIM OXO is our overall winner. As a rider, the INOKIM OXO simply feels like the more complete companion: it glides instead of fights, reassures instead of surprises, and turns every long ride into something you actually look forward to rather than endure. The LAOTIE ES10P is massively entertaining and astonishing for the money, but it never quite shakes the feeling of being a wild project that you have to manage. If you want a scooter that will quietly become part of your daily life and keep rewarding you years down the line, the OXO is the one that wins your heart as well as your commute. The ES10P remains a brilliant guilty pleasure - just best enjoyed by those who love a bit of chaos with their speed.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.

