Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
If you want the simplest, cheapest way to glide through short city commutes with almost zero maintenance, the ISCOOTER i9 is the more sensible overall pick here. It is lighter on your wallet, easier to live with day to day, and asks for very little in return beyond accepting a firmer ride on bad roads. The LEVY Original feels nicer underfoot thanks to its big air-filled tyres and clever swappable battery, but you pay a noticeable premium for that flexibility and its single-battery range is actually shorter.
Choose the LEVY if you specifically need the removable battery - for example, you must lock the scooter outside and charge upstairs, or you want to carry spare packs for modular range. Otherwise, for typical flat-to-moderately-hilly urban commutes, the ISCOOTER i9 gives you more practicality per euro.
If you care about the day-to-day reality more than brochure promises, keep reading - the devil, and the decision, lives in the details.
Electric scooters in this price band are no longer toys; they are legitimate car-alternatives for short urban hops. The ISCOOTER i9 and LEVY Original sit squarely in that "serious commuter, still sane budget" segment, aiming to replace your morning bus ride, not your motorcycle. I have ridden variations of both type of scooter for countless city kilometres - from polished riverside paths to that charmingly broken cobblestone that certain mayors insist is "historic character".
On paper, these two look like close cousins: similar motor power, similar top speed, similar weight. In practice, they represent two quite different philosophies. The i9 is your low-cost, low-maintenance pack mule; the LEVY is the clever urbanite with a party trick - the removable battery. One is about doing enough, cheaply. The other is about solving charging logistics, less about maximising value.
If you are torn between them, this comparison will walk you through how they actually feel to ride, own and maintain - not just how they look on the spec sheet.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
Both scooters target everyday commuters who mostly ride on tarmac, rarely exceed city cycling speeds, and want something that can be carried up stairs without requiring a gym membership. Think office workers, students, and urban dwellers replacing a 20-30 minute walk with a 7-10 minute glide.
The ISCOOTER i9 lives at the aggressively budget end: it is designed to be bought once, used hard, and not fussed over. You trade some comfort and refinement for a very low purchase price, puncture-proof tyres, and minimal maintenance stress.
The LEVY Original sits a step up: more expensive, slightly posher, with a clever removable battery that genuinely changes how you can own and charge it. It is especially interesting for people who cannot easily wheel a scooter into their flat or office.
They compete because they promise a similar performance class - "Xiaomi-class" commuting speed, moderate hills, short to medium daily range - but take opposite approaches: i9 chases low cost and simplicity; LEVY chases convenience and modularity. If you are shopping this category, these are exactly the two mindsets you are probably bouncing between.
Design & Build Quality
In the hand, the ISCOOTER i9 feels like a very typical modern budget commuter: slim stem, battery in the deck, matte finish, internally routed cables. It is decently put together - nothing wows, nothing horrifies. The hinge clicks into place with enough solidity that you do not instinctively check it twice at every traffic light. It is an honest, no-frills design that borrows heavily from proven templates rather than trying to reinvent anything.
The LEVY Original, by contrast, immediately feels more engineered. The thick stem that houses the removable battery gives it a more substantial, "grown-up" presence, and the overall chassis feels more rigid when you rock the bars back and forth. Paint and finish are a touch nicer, though not exactly indestructible - urban reality will still leave its mark.
Ergonomically, both are familiar: central display, thumb throttle, bicycle-style brake lever. The i9 goes for a slightly narrower, more compact cockpit that suits smaller riders and tight storage spaces. The LEVY's wider-looking, chunkier stem does make mounting third-party accessories a bit fiddlier, but once set up, it feels closer to a "real vehicle" than a gadget.
In build quality, the LEVY edges ahead - the frame feels tighter and more premium - but given the price difference, the i9 actually punches reasonably well for what it costs.
Ride Comfort & Handling
This is where their philosophies collide head-on: i9's solid honeycomb tyres versus LEVY's big air-filled ones.
The ISCOOTER i9 on fresh asphalt is pleasantly uneventful: the tyres give just enough flex to take the buzz out of small imperfections, and at typical city speeds you can relax your knees and let it hum along. The moment you hit older pavements, cracks, or cobblestones, the truth comes out. After a few kilometres of rough city sidewalks, your hands and knees know exactly how much you have saved by not buying suspension or pneumatic tyres. It is rideable, but you naturally slow down and start picking smoother lines like a cyclist on a skinny road bike.
The LEVY Original feels immediately more forgiving. Those large pneumatic tyres act as built-in suspension, rounding off manhole lips, expansion joints and the random patchwork repairs that define many European cycle paths. You still feel the surface - this is not a plush, sprung chassis - but the harsh impacts are muted. On mixed or rougher roads, you stay closer to full speed without feeling like you are punishing your joints for fun.
Handling-wise, both are stable for their class. The i9 is light and a touch more "nervous" on broken ground because the solid tyres skip rather than mould themselves around obstacles. The LEVY, with more weight in the stem and that grippy front pneumatic tyre, feels more planted in corners and under braking. For smoother cities, the i9 is fine. For any town with older streets or frequent patchy surfaces, the LEVY clearly rides nicer.
Performance
Both scooters share roughly the same rated motor output, and in gentle city use they feel broadly similar: you kick off, roll on the thumb throttle, and they climb to their regulated city pace in a calm, predictable way. Neither is going to snap your neck; both are a healthy "faster than bicycles from the lights, slower than impatient cars".
The ISCOOTER i9's acceleration is very linear. In its higher mode it pulls steadily up to its top speed and then just sits there. On flat ground you can weave through bike-lane traffic without any drama. On moderate inclines, the i9 does what budget single-motor scooters always do: it slows, digs in, and eventually gets you there. If you are close to the upper end of its rider weight limit or live somewhere properly hilly, you will be coaxing it up steeper ramps rather than conquering them.
The LEVY Original feels a touch more eager when you first push off - the front hub motor gives you a nice "pull" off the line and through low-to-mid speeds. Top speed is a hair higher in real use, but we are splitting hairs; the real difference is how it holds pace. On gentle hills and bridges it seems to cling to its speed just a little better than the i9, especially with a lighter rider. Put a heavier rider on a serious incline and, again, physics wins: you will slow down and maybe add the occasional kick for good measure.
Braking is a crucial part of performance, and here both are better than many budget machines. The i9's combination of rear disc and front electronic braking gives you reassuring stopping power, though you can occasionally get some squeal from the mechanical side. The LEVY ups the redundancy game with disc, regen and the classic stomp-on-the-fender option; the lever feel is progressive, and the front tyre grip means emergency braking feels more controlled. If you regularly ride in tight, busy traffic, the LEVY's braking package inspires more confidence - but the i9 is acceptable for sensible speeds in its intended habitat.
Battery & Range
The range story is a bit counterintuitive if you only look at marketing blurbs.
The ISCOOTER i9 carries a modest deck battery sized for everyday short commutes. In the real world, with a reasonably brisk pace and a not-superhuman rider, expect something like a there-and-back office commute in the low-teens of kilometres total, plus a little safety cushion. Ride flatter routes in a slower mode and you can stretch that; ride like you are trying to win the Tour de Commute and it will shrink. Importantly, the i9's consumption is fairly predictable - there is no surprise "cliff" so long as you keep an eye on the battery gauge.
The LEVY Original, surprisingly, gives you less per battery. In calm Eco riding, it can approach its claimed distance, but push it in Sport mode or add hills and you are looking at more of a short one-way commute with not huge reserves. That is where the whole removable-battery concept comes in: carry a second pack and suddenly it becomes a mid-range machine, at the cost of extra money and the mild faff of swapping packs and remembering to charge both.
Charging routines differ as much as the hardware. The i9 is old-school: you bring the scooter to the plug. Thankfully, the charge time is short enough that topping it up at home or work is easy if you plan ahead. The LEVY lets you detach the battery and leave the slightly grubby hardware downstairs, which is brilliant for people with stairs, strict office security, or precious carpets. The pack itself charges quickly enough that a lunchtime plug-in comfortably recovers a good chunk of capacity.
So: out of the box, without buying extras, the i9 actually goes further on a charge. The LEVY only wins the range game if you are willing to invest in (and carry) extra batteries - a clever system, but not free.
Portability & Practicality
On the scales, both sit in that sweet spot where you can carry them up a flight or two without regretting life choices - but you still feel you are holding a vehicle, not a toy.
The ISCOOTER i9 is slightly lighter and more compact when folded. Carrying it up stairs or onto a crowded tram feels like lugging a reasonably heavy suitcase. The folding mechanism is quick and simple; hook it onto the rear fender and you have a tidy, narrow package that lives happily under a desk or behind a door. This is the sort of scooter you genuinely do not mind grabbing for a "five-minute pop to the shop".
The LEVY Original is also pleasantly light, though a touch heavier on the front because of the battery in the stem. Carrying it by the stem is still fine; you just notice the weight bias more when manoeuvring in tight hallways or onto trains. It folds down neatly and fits under seats, but the chunkier stem does consume a bit more visual and physical space than the i9's slimmer silhouette.
Practicality is where their paths really diverge. With the i9, practicality equals "it is light, simple and always ready; just remember the charger if you need it". With the LEVY, practicality is "lock the frame, take the battery; charge inside; carry a spare if needed; never drag dirty tyres across your office carpet". If your building rules are strict or you physically cannot bring the frame inside, the LEVY's system is a genuine game-changer. If you can easily park the scooter by a plug anyway, the i9's simpler approach is, frankly, easier to live with and cheaper.
Safety
Safety is a mix of braking, grip, lighting and overall stability - and both scooters clear the bar for urban use, albeit in different ways.
Braking first: the i9's dual system does a solid job. Use both electronic and mechanical braking together and you can confidently scrub speed before junctions or inattentive pedestrians. Modulation is decent; you can feather the lever without catapulting yourself forward. The LEVY adds that extra regeneration on the front plus the emergency fender stomp, and its front pneumatic tyre offers more bite on sketchy surfaces. On dust, wet patches or leaf-strewn bike lanes, it simply feels more composed when you panic-grab a handful of brake.
Grip and stability largely come back to the tyre choice. Solid honeycomb tyres on the i9 mean no puncture risk, but they do not deform into the surface in the same way. In the dry that is mainly a comfort issue; in the wet you will want to be a little gentler tipping into corners or braking hard. The LEVY's 10-inch pneumatics track the road more confidently, particularly when surfaces are uneven or damp. At their modest speeds, either scooter is safe in sensible hands, but the LEVY gives a wider margin for sloppy road maintenance and rain.
Lighting is decent on both: bright stem-mounted front LEDs and rear brake lights that actually catch attention. The i9's flashing rear when braking is notably visible in chaotic traffic. The LEVY's clean, integrated lights look more "OEM vehicle" than "Amazon gadget", but functionally they are in the same ballpark. Add a helmet light and you are good on either.
Overall, the LEVY edges safety thanks to better tyre grip and slightly more robust braking redundancy. The i9 is safe within its intended use and speed - but it does not leave you much room to be careless on wet or broken tarmac.
Community Feedback
| ISCOOTER i9 | LEVY Original |
|---|---|
What riders love
|
What riders love
|
What riders complain about
|
What riders complain about
|
Price & Value
This is where the comparison turns from "interesting" to "slightly awkward" for one of them.
The ISCOOTER i9 lands in classic budget territory. You pay less than many people spend on a phone and receive a full-size, road-legal commuter with app support, decent brakes and a real-world range good enough for most short urbans. It is not luxurious, but it justifies its asking price without having to apologise, especially when you add the almost zero tyre maintenance.
The LEVY Original costs noticeably more, and you feel that in some areas - nicer ride from the tyres, stronger branding, better parts availability and the genuinely handy removable battery. But when you strip away the cleverness and ask: "What does my money actually translate to in speed, range, and power?", it starts to look less generous. Out of the box, it covers fewer kilometres per charge, with similar pace, for significantly more money. If you must have the removable battery, the price is bearable. If you do not, you are paying quite a premium for a comfort upgrade.
In pure euros-for-what-you-get terms, the i9 is the stronger value proposition. The LEVY's value only fully materialises if you exploit its swappable system and long-term serviceability - which not everyone will need or use.
Service & Parts Availability
The after-sales story is one of the LEVY's strongest cards. Being run by a company with fleet experience and a proper parts catalogue makes a difference. Need a new battery, throttle, fender or controller? Their ecosystem actually expects you to repair rather than bin the scooter, and there is real support infrastructure behind that, especially if you are in or near their main markets.
ISCOOTER sits more in the "big online budget brand" camp. They have warehouses and do ship spares, and many components are generic enough that third-party replacements are easy to source. Community reports suggest you can keep an i9 alive, but turnaround times for warranty queries can be hit-and-miss, and you are sometimes relying on your own patience and a bit of mechanical confidence.
For riders in Europe, both are serviceable, but LEVY is clearly the more repair-friendly ecosystem on paper. The question is whether that outweighs the higher initial cost for your use case.
Pros & Cons Summary
| ISCOOTER i9 | LEVY Original |
|---|---|
Pros
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
Cons
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | ISCOOTER i9 | LEVY Original |
|---|---|---|
| Motor power (rated) | 350 W rear hub | 350 W front hub (700 W peak) |
| Top speed | Ca. 25-30 km/h | Ca. 29 km/h |
| Claimed range | 25-28 km | 16 km per battery |
| Real-world range (est.) | 18-22 km | 12-16 km per battery |
| Battery | 36 V / 7,5 Ah (270 Wh) | 36 V / 6,4 Ah (230 Wh) |
| Charging time | Ca. 3-5 h | Ca. 2,5-3 h |
| Weight | 12,5 kg | 12,25 kg |
| Brakes | Front EABS + rear disc | Front E-ABS + rear disc + fender |
| Suspension | None (solid honeycomb tyres) | None (10" pneumatic tyres) |
| Tyres | 8,5" honeycomb solid | 10" pneumatic (tubed) |
| Max load | 120 kg | Ca. 125 kg |
| IP rating | IP54 | IP54 |
| Price (approx.) | 310 € | 472 € |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
If you strip away brand stories and clever tricks and just ask, "Which scooter makes more sense for most everyday riders?", the ISCOOTER i9 comes out ahead here. It is not glamorous, and it certainly does not feel boutique, but it hits the core commuter needs: affordable to buy, easy to carry, enough range for typical city hops, and almost zero drama when it comes to tyre maintenance. You feel the corners that were cut, but less than you might expect for the price.
The LEVY Original is the more sophisticated machine in some respects - nicer ride, smarter charging, better support - but its single-battery range and noticeably higher price make it harder to recommend as the default choice. If you live in a building where charging the whole scooter inside is a nightmare, or you know you will routinely carry spare batteries to stretch the range, then the LEVY suddenly makes a lot of sense despite its cost. You are paying for a solution to a specific lifestyle problem, not maximum spec per euro.
For everyone else - the majority who just want a reliable, inexpensive companion for short city commutes and errands - the i9 is simply the more rational pick in this pairing. Learn to live with the firmer ride, and it will quietly do the job without demanding much from your wallet or your time.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | ISCOOTER i9 | LEVY Original |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ✅ 1,15 €/Wh | ❌ 2,05 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ✅ 10,33 €/km/h | ❌ 16,28 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ✅ 46,30 g/Wh | ❌ 53,26 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | Weight per km/h (kg/km/h)✅ 0,42 kg/km/h | ✅ 0,42 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ✅ 15,50 €/km | ❌ 33,71 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ✅ 0,63 kg/km | ❌ 0,88 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ✅ 13,50 Wh/km | ❌ 16,43 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ❌ 11,67 W/km/h | ✅ 12,07 W/km/h |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | ❌ 0,0357 kg/W | ✅ 0,0350 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ❌ 67,50 W | ✅ 83,64 W |
These metrics give a purely numerical view of efficiency and value: how much you pay and carry for each unit of energy, speed or range, plus how quickly the battery fills back up. Lower "per Wh" and "per km" numbers mean you are getting more travel for less money or weight, while lower Wh/km shows better energy efficiency. Ratios like power-to-speed and weight-to-power hint at how strong and sprightly a scooter is for its performance class, and average charging speed tells you how fast you can realistically get back on the road.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | ISCOOTER i9 | LEVY Original |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ❌ Slightly heavier overall | ✅ Marginally lighter to carry |
| Range | ✅ More km per charge | ❌ Shorter on single battery |
| Max Speed | ❌ Slightly lower real top | ✅ Touch higher cruising |
| Power | ❌ Feels more modest | ✅ Punchier, better pull |
| Battery Size | ✅ Larger capacity pack | ❌ Smaller single battery |
| Suspension | ❌ Solid tyres, no give | ✅ Pneumatics mimic suspension |
| Design | ❌ Generic budget aesthetic | ✅ Cleaner, more premium look |
| Safety | ❌ Adequate but limited grip | ✅ Better grip, stronger brakes |
| Practicality | ✅ Simple, minimal fuss use | ❌ Dependent on extra batteries |
| Comfort | ❌ Harsh on rough surfaces | ✅ Noticeably smoother ride |
| Features | ✅ App, cruise, solid basics | ✅ Swappable pack, cruise, brakes |
| Serviceability | ❌ Generic, DIY but patchy | ✅ Designed to be repairable |
| Customer Support | ❌ Mixed, slower responses | ✅ Responsive, brand-backed help |
| Fun Factor | ❌ Functional more than playful | ✅ Zippier, smoother enjoyment |
| Build Quality | ❌ Feels more budget-grade | ✅ Tighter, more solid chassis |
| Component Quality | ❌ Fender, grips, details basic | ✅ Better tyres, controls, feel |
| Brand Name | ❌ Less established image | ✅ Stronger urban reputation |
| Community | ✅ Large budget-user base | ✅ Engaged, supported owners |
| Lights (visibility) | ✅ Flashing brake stands out | ❌ Solid but less distinctive |
| Lights (illumination) | ❌ Adequate, nothing special | ✅ Slightly stronger presence |
| Acceleration | ❌ Smooth but modest | ✅ Punchier initial shove |
| Arrive with smile factor | ❌ More "job done" feeling | ✅ More grin per kilometre |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ❌ Rougher roads tire quicker | ✅ Softer ride, less fatigue |
| Charging speed | ❌ Slower for full refill | ✅ Faster turnaround charging |
| Reliability | ✅ Simple, few complex parts | ✅ Solid engineering, good BMS |
| Folded practicality | ✅ Slimmer, easier to stash | ❌ Chunkier stem footprint |
| Ease of transport | ✅ Light, balanced enough | ❌ Front-heavy, slightly awkward |
| Handling | ❌ Harsher, less composed | ✅ Grippier, more planted |
| Braking performance | ❌ Good, but less refined | ✅ Stronger, more controlled |
| Riding position | ✅ Compact, easy stance | ✅ Comfortable, natural ergonomics |
| Handlebar quality | ❌ Basic grips, smaller bar | ✅ Feels sturdier in use |
| Throttle response | ❌ Gentle, less exciting | ✅ Smooth, more responsive |
| Dashboard / Display | ✅ Bright, readable enough | ❌ Occasional sunlight issues |
| Security (locking) | ❌ Needs classic locking only | ✅ Remove battery, less attractive |
| Weather protection | ✅ IP54, solid tyres help | ✅ IP54, decent sealing |
| Resale value | ❌ Budget brand depreciates faster | ✅ Stronger brand, better resale |
| Tuning potential | ✅ Generic parts compatibility | ❌ More proprietary layout |
| Ease of maintenance | ✅ No flats, simple hardware | ❌ Tyres, extras need more care |
| Value for Money | ✅ Excellent for the price | ❌ Good, but pricey here |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the ISCOOTER i9 scores 7 points against the LEVY Original's 4. In the Author's Category Battle, the ISCOOTER i9 gets 15 ✅ versus 29 ✅ for LEVY Original (with a few ties sprinkled in).
Totals: ISCOOTER i9 scores 22, LEVY Original scores 33.
Based on the scoring, the LEVY Original is our overall winner. Between these two, the ISCOOTER i9 is the scooter I would quietly recommend to most everyday riders who simply want an affordable, low-drama way to shrink their city. It is not the most exciting thing I have ever stood on, but it gets the fundamentals right for far less money than you might expect. The LEVY Original is the more charming companion if ride comfort and that clever removable battery really speak to your situation, yet it never quite escapes the feeling that you are paying a noticeable premium for its tricks. If your life is built around staircases and strict doormen, it may still be worth it - but for everyone else, the i9 just makes more pragmatic sense.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.

