MEARTH RS Pro vs NAVEE N65i - Two "Urban Tanks" Go Head to Head

Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)

The NAVEE N65i edges out the MEARTH RS Pro as the more rounded everyday machine, mainly thanks to its stronger hill performance, better safety kit (those indicators are no gimmick), smarter folding and slightly more confidence-inspiring ride. It just feels more sorted as a daily commuter, especially if your city has gradients and questionable drivers.

The MEARTH RS Pro still makes sense if range is your obsession, you like the idea of a removable battery, or you can get it significantly cheaper in your market. It's a long-distance workhorse with solid brakes and good stability, let down a little by comfort and refinement.

If you want a planted, practical "urban SUV" scooter, go NAVEE. If you're a mileage-maximising super-commuter who values battery and local MEARTH support (in Australia especially), the RS Pro remains a decent, if slightly no-frills, choice.

Stick around for the full breakdown-there are some important nuances here that the spec sheets alone absolutely do not tell you.

Electric scooters in this weight and price class have one job: replace your car or your train pass without making your knees hate you. The MEARTH RS Pro and NAVEE N65i both promise to do exactly that, but with very different personalities. I've spent enough kilometres on both to know that on paper they look similar; on tarmac, they don't feel the same at all.

The RS Pro is a long-range commuter that basically says, "I'll get you there, don't ask me to be fancy." The N65i replies, "I'll get you there too, and maybe I won't annoy you in the process." Both are serious, mid-weight commuters; neither is what I'd call a dream scooter, but they're sensible, adult tools for people who just need to get places.

If you're trying to decide which chunk of metal you're going to trust your commute (and shins) to, let's dig into how they really compare.

Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?

These two live in the same neighbourhood: mid-range price, mid-20-something kilo class, single rear motors, realistic real-world ranges that comfortably cover a typical day's errands and commuting. They're for riders who have grown out of skinny-tired rental clones but aren't interested in monster dual-motor race scooters.

The RS Pro is for the rider who measures life in kilometres per charge and doesn't mind a slightly utilitarian feel if it means fewer dates with the charger. The N65i, meanwhile, aims at the "urban SUV" crowd: people who value stability, decent power on hills, smart folding and safety gadgets like indicators.

They compete because, if you walk into a shop or scroll a webshop with around six to seven hundred euro in your pocket, both will come up as options for the "serious commuter" bracket. They're natural rivals for the same kind of practical, no-nonsense rider.

Design & Build Quality

Both scooters go for the "small tank" aesthetic: chunky stems, wide decks, matte finishes. You won't mistake either for a toy.

The MEARTH RS Pro's magnesium frame is its party trick. In the hands, it feels rigid and slightly more refined than you'd expect at this price, with that "solid bar" sensation when you rock the handlebars. Earlier RS hinges had some reputation for developing play, but newer batches feel tighter; still, it's a spot I'd keep an eye on if you ride hard.

The NAVEE N65i feels even more heavy-duty. The welds look clean, the stem latch is satisfyingly over-engineered, and the overall impression is of a scooter designed by an OEM that builds for other brands as well-which, in NAVEE's case, is true. You notice fewer creaks and rattles as mileage climbs. The deck is wider than on the RS Pro, and the whole thing has that "designed to be abused" vibe.

Philosophically, MEARTH spends its budget on battery and decent brakes; NAVEE spends more on frame refinement, folding cleverness and integration (display, lights, indicators). If you like subtle design touches, the N65i feels the more mature product. If you just want a tough frame that holds a big battery, the RS Pro gets it done, if not elegantly.

Ride Comfort & Handling

Neither of these scooters has traditional suspension, and both rely on large pneumatic tyres and frame flex. That's not unusual in this category, but it does mean your knees are part of the suspension system-welcome to the team.

On the RS Pro, you get decent-sized tyres with a gel layer. They grip well, but the added stiffness makes the ride a bit firmer than a pure air tyre. On decent tarmac and smoother cycle paths, it feels planted and reassuring. Once you hit rougher city surfaces-those broken concrete patches, tiled pavements or lazy roadworks-the lack of suspension becomes pretty obvious. After a handful of kilometres on truly bad sidewalks, your legs will know about it.

The N65i counters with slightly larger, fatter tubeless tyres. The extra volume takes the sting out of small imperfections noticeably better. Cobblestones still aren't fun, but they're less bone-jarring here than on the RS Pro. The wide handlebars and broader deck also give you more leverage and stability, so you can dance over potholes with a bit more control instead of clenching and hoping.

Handling-wise, the RS Pro is stable in a straight line and fairly neutral in corners-nothing dramatic, nothing exciting. The N65i feels more "locked in"; you can lean it more confidently into bends, and quick swerves to avoid pedestrians or creatively parked cars feel more controlled. Neither is twitchy, but the N65i has the edge in overall composure.

Performance

Power delivery is where the NAVEE starts to justify its higher price. Its stronger 48 V system and higher peak output give it livelier responses when you twist the throttle. It doesn't yank your arms, but it has that satisfying "push in the lower back" when you pull away from lights, and it keeps that eagerness longer as the battery drains.

The RS Pro's motor isn't weak-it will happily outpace rental scooters and most budget commuters-but it feels more modest. Acceleration is brisk rather than spirited, with a steady build that suits relaxed commuting more than enthusiastic carving. If you unlock the higher top speed where legal, the chassis copes, but you do feel that you're asking a commuter motor to work near the upper edge of its comfort zone.

On hills the contrast is sharper. The RS Pro will climb typical urban grades without drama, but steeper sections see its speed dropping and its effort showing. You don't have to jump off and push, but you won't be overtaking cyclists either. The N65i, thanks to its beefier electrical system, hangs on to its speed better and feels less strained. In properly hilly cities, that difference is noticeable day after day.

Braking: here, both are strong, but with different feels. The RS Pro's dual mechanical discs plus electronic brake give it direct bite and reassuring stopping, though cheaper cables and callipers do need periodic tweaking. The N65i's drum front / disc rear / electronic combo is smoother and more progressive, with the bonus that the drum is almost maintenance-free. When you're braking hard in wet conditions, the NAVEE's setup feels a bit more controlled and less squealy.

Battery & Range

If range is your absolute priority, the RS Pro is the one looking smug. Its battery is noticeably bigger, and real-world riding shows it. Where most people will see the N65i quietly bow out after a decent day of mixed riding, the RS Pro usually still has enough juice to detour via the long way home-and then some.

In everyday terms: the N65i comfortably covers a fairly long round-trip commute plus errands, as long as you're not riding everywhere at full tilt up steep hills. The RS Pro lets you be lazier with charging: for a normal urban rider, plugging in every second or even third day is realistic.

The removable battery on newer RS Pro versions is a genuine advantage if you live upstairs or want ludicrous range by carrying a spare. Charging the pack in your flat and leaving the (muddy) scooter in a basement is far more civilised than dragging the whole thing in every time. The N65i's fixed pack means the whole scooter goes where the charger is, full stop.

On the flip side, the larger RS Pro pack takes a long time to fill; you're looking at an all-night affair from empty. The N65i isn't exactly sipping electrons either, but its slightly smaller battery plus longer quoted charge time means you're broadly in the same "plug it in after work or overnight" reality with both. Neither wins any awards for fast charging.

Portability & Practicality

Both scooters sit firmly in the "you can carry it if you really must" category. One flight of stairs is fine; four flights every day becomes a cross-training routine.

The RS Pro has a straightforward fold: stem down, hook to the rear. The magnesium frame keeps weight just about tolerable, but it's still a sizeable lump. The non-folding bars mean you end up with a long, wide package that's awkward on crowded trains or narrow corridors. It will fit in a small car boot, but it will also claim most of that space.

The NAVEE N65i's DoubleFlip system is genuinely useful. Fold the stem, then swivel the handlebars to make the whole thing much slimmer. The resulting package is easier to stash behind a door, under a desk, or in a packed boot alongside bags and a bored dog. The weight feels similar in the hand, but the shape makes a big difference in real life. You're still not hopping up stairs whistling, but moving it around in tight spaces is less of a wrestling match.

Day-to-day practicality also includes weather. The N65i's slightly higher water resistance rating gives it a bit more margin in typical European drizzle or surprise puddles, whereas the RS Pro is fine with splashes but is a little less relaxed about proper rain. I wouldn't treat either like a submarine, but the NAVEE feels happier in a grey, wet winter.

Safety

On the stopping front, both do well and feel a cut above cheaper commuters. The RS Pro's dual discs give a strong initial bite and short stopping distance once dialled in. The N65i's combination of drum, disc and electronic brake is more progressive and easier for newer riders to modulate; you're less likely to lock a wheel in a panic grab.

Where the N65i really pulls ahead is visibility and signalling. Integrated, bright turn indicators and an auto-sensing headlight aren't just nice touches; they genuinely reduce sketchy moments in traffic. Being able to indicate properly without aftermarket clip-on lights is a big win in busy cities.

The RS Pro's lighting is adequate: bright headlight, decent rear light with brake indication, and those eye-catching red wheels that do help side visibility a bit. It's fine, just not remarkable. You'll want to add some reflective gear or extra lights if you ride a lot at night in heavy traffic.

In terms of stability at speed, both are reassuring, but the N65i's wider tyres and deck, plus slightly more planted stance, inspire a bit more confidence when you glance over your shoulder, signal, and change lanes. The RS Pro feels stable enough, but you're more aware you're on a long-range commuter rather than a particularly sophisticated chassis.

Community Feedback

Price & Value

The RS Pro undercuts the N65i by a noticeable margin. For that lower price you get a larger battery, hot-swap capability on newer versions, dual disc brakes and a frame that doesn't feel cheap. On a cost-per-kilometre-of-range basis, it's actually very respectable. You can tell some corners are trimmed around polish and features, but not in deal-breaking ways.

The N65i costs more but gives you a stronger electrical system, better hill performance, more sophisticated folding, higher load rating, indicators and overall nicer integration. You're buying refinement, safety and everyday convenience more than raw spec. If you actually use those things-steep hills, shared storage, night riding-its price starts to make sense.

Put simply: if your budget is tight and you mainly care about range per euro spent, the RS Pro is the more rational buy. If you can stretch a bit and want something that just feels more sorted and future-proofed, the N65i earns its premium.

Service & Parts Availability

This is where geography matters. MEARTH is an Australian brand with a solid presence there; Aussie riders benefit from local support, easier warranty handling and relatively straightforward parts sourcing. Outside that region, you're more dependent on resellers, which can be hit-and-miss.

NAVEE, on the other hand, rides on its connection to big-name OEM manufacturing. In Europe especially, parts and service pathways are slowly improving as more units hit the market and shared component platforms spread, though it's not yet at the level of the very biggest global brands.

Neither scooter is a nightmare to work on: brakes, tyres and basic hardware are all fairly standard. The RS Pro's removable battery is easier to deal with if you ever need a pack swap. The N65i benefits from a drum front brake that reduces service needs in the first place. I'd lean RS Pro for DIY battery/service tinkerers, N65i for people who just want to touch the scooter as little as possible between rides.

Pros & Cons Summary

Parameters Comparison

Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?

Both scooters sit in that slightly unglamorous space of "sensible transport," and both do the job. Neither is a revelation, but both are a clear upgrade from entry-level city toys.

If your life is defined by long, flat to moderately hilly commutes and you care more about how many days you can avoid the charger than anything else, the MEARTH RS Pro makes sense. Its big battery and removable pack are practical, its brakes are strong, and for Australian buyers in particular the local support is a real plus. Accept that the ride is firm, the features are basic, and the overall feel is more "range tool" than "polished product."

If, however, your city has proper hills, your storage is tight, and you like your safety gear integrated rather than zip-tied on, the NAVEE N65i is the better choice. It rides with more confidence, climbs with less drama, folds into a more civilised shape, and its indicators and lighting might literally save you from becoming a bonnet ornament. You pay more, but you get a scooter that feels more considered and cohesive.

In the end, I'd recommend the N65i to most riders who just want a robust, confidence-inspiring commuter and aren't obsessed with maxing out range. The RS Pro is for the mileage nerds and battery maximalists who are willing to trade a bit of refinement for extra kilometres.

Numbers Freaks Corner

These metrics put numbers on what your wallet, back, and range anxiety already suspect. Price-per-Wh and price-per-km tell you how much you pay for energy and distance. Weight-per-Wh and weight-per-km show how much mass you lug around for that distance. Efficiency (Wh/km) indicates how gently each scooter sips from its battery. Power-to-speed and weight-to-power give a sense of performance for the mass you're moving, while average charging speed reflects how quickly they refill. Mathematically, the RS Pro is clearly the range and energy-value specialist; the N65i trades that advantage for other, non-numerical strengths.

Author's Category Battle

Overall Winner Declaration

In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the MEARTH RS Pro scores 9 points against the NAVEE N65i's 1. In the Author's Category Battle, the MEARTH RS Pro gets 10 ✅ versus 31 ✅ for NAVEE N65i (with a few ties sprinkled in).

Totals: MEARTH RS Pro scores 19, NAVEE N65i scores 32.

Based on the scoring, the NAVEE N65i is our overall winner. In daily use, the NAVEE N65i simply feels like the more complete companion: calmer over rough city streets, more reassuring in traffic, and less fussy to live with in tight European-style spaces. You step off it feeling like your scooter quietly had your back. The MEARTH RS Pro punches hard on range and value and will absolutely suit riders who just want distance without drama, but it lacks some of the polish and easy confidence the N65i brings. If I had to live with one as my only commuter, I'd pick the NAVEE-but if my job was stacking kilometres, the MEARTH would still be tempting for its sheer stubborn endurance.

That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.