Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
The MIA FOUR X2 (4x2) is the clear overall winner if you care about stability, comfort, and feeling genuinely safe while still riding something that pulls like a small motorcycle. It rides like a shrunken ATV with a luxury suspension, eats bad roads for breakfast, and feels like a "forever scooter" rather than a seasonal toy.
The GOTRAX GX3, meanwhile, makes sense if you want big power and proper dual-motor thrills at a much lower price, and you are willing to live with some quirks and a more ordinary two-wheeled experience. It is the budget-friendly gateway into serious performance, especially for heavier or thrill-seeking riders.
If money, storage space and weight aren't your main problems, go MIA. If your wallet has a say and you still want to go very fast and far, the GX3 is the practical choice.
Now, let's dig into how these two very different animals behave when you actually ride them - because that's where the real story starts.
Comparing the MIA FOUR X2 (4x2) and the GOTRAX GX3 is a bit like pitting a rally-bred ATV against a tuned street bike. On paper they both promise serious speed, big batteries and off-road potential. On the road - and off it - they couldn't feel more different.
I've spent time on both: the GX3 as a surprisingly capable "big boy" upgrade from the usual campus scooters, and the MIA FOUR X2 as that rare machine that immediately makes you wonder why we ever balanced all this power on just two wheels. One is a great value performance scooter; the other quietly tries to redefine what a high-end scooter can be.
The MIA FOUR X2 is for riders who are done gambling with sketchy surfaces and want car-level stability without giving up the thrill. The GOTRAX GX3 is for riders who want maximum grin-per-Euro and don't mind wrestling a heavy, powerful two-wheeler.
On the following kilometres we'll go through design, comfort, performance, range, practicality and more - and by the end, you'll know exactly which of these two belongs in your garage.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
Both the MIA FOUR X2 and the GOTRAX GX3 live in the "serious scooter" segment - heavy, fast, long-range machines that can replace a car for many trips. They both cater to riders who've outgrown flimsy commuters and want something that can shrug off bad roads and hills without flinching.
The overlap: both are aimed at heavier riders, performance fans and people who want to ride further and faster than the legal rental scooters buzzing around cities. Both can handle rough tarmac, park paths and mild trails. Both are too heavy for easy stair-carrying and should be treated more like small mopeds than toys.
The split: the MIA FOUR X2 sits in the premium, almost exotic category - a tilting four-wheeler with a swappable battery and a price tag to match. The GX3 is a value-focused bruiser: dual motors, proper suspension, strong range, but firmly rooted in the traditional two-wheel format and a far more accessible price band.
So why compare them? Because many riders are standing exactly at this crossroads: do you splash out on a truly different, high-end concept that prioritises stability and comfort, or do you buy a more conventional, cheaper performance scooter that still hits hard on speed and range?
Design & Build Quality
Put the two side by side and you instantly understand the philosophical divide.
The MIA FOUR X2 looks like someone shrunk a Dakar buggy and stuck handlebars on it. Four big pneumatic wheels, double-wishbone suspension arms on display, a wide, purposeful stance - it has the presence of a serious machine. You see metal and reinforced polymer, not decorative plastic. Grab the stem, flex the bars, and nothing gives. The deck is broad, the joints look over-engineered, and the whole thing screams "engineered first, styled later". You can see where the money went.
The GOTRAX GX3 is no toy either. The frame is chunky aluminium and steel, the welds are decent, and the scooter feels dense in your hands. The tall deck and high ground clearance give it a "monster scooter" posture. Cable routing is tidy for the price, and the folding joint locks down reassuringly, with none of the horror-movie stem wobble you sometimes get in cheaper performance imports. It's a genuinely solid unit - but also clearly built to a budget, with more generic components and less of that custom-engineered feel you get from the MIA.
Where the MIA impresses with intricate suspension hardware and a visibly unique platform, the GX3 feels more like a well-executed, heavy-duty take on the classic big dual-motor scooter recipe. One is distinctive and premium; the other is rugged and sensible.
Ride Comfort & Handling
Comfort is where the MIA FOUR X2 quietly walks away from the GX3 - and from most of the scooter market, frankly.
On the MIA, those huge tyres and the double-wishbone suspension work together to create that rare "stop bracing for impact" feeling. Cobblestones become texture rather than trauma. Riding across tram tracks or broken city patches, you're not subconsciously hovering your knees, waiting for the next spine punch; you just roll over and let the chassis do its thing. The tilting mechanism means you lean naturally like on a normal scooter, but with four contact patches silently smoothing out the chaos beneath you.
Handling is equally impressive. Despite being wide, the X2 feels surprisingly nimble once you get used to the stance. You carve turns like on a big carving longboard - confident, planted, with grip to spare. There's none of that "is the front going to wash out if I lean a bit more?" anxiety you get on many powerful two-wheelers. It invites you to push, but never feels sketchy.
The GX3 is no slouch in comfort either - in fact, for a conventional scooter at this price, it's excellent. The adjustable hydraulic suspension and large tyres turn rough city streets into something quite tolerable. You can soften it for trail riding and firm it up for faster asphalt work. Long rides don't leave your feet buzzing or your lower back complaining. Compared to typical entry-level scooters, it's a different universe.
But when you ride them back to back, the difference is conspicuous. The GX3 still feels like a very good suspended scooter. The MIA feels like a small, floating vehicle. On sketchy surfaces and long, bumpy commutes, the X2 simply makes your body - and your mind - work less.
Performance
Both scooters are properly fast - not "oh, it's quicker than a rental" fast, but "I'd like motorcycle-grade protective gear, please" fast.
The MIA FOUR X2's dual motors deliver a muscular shove that feels more like being pushed by a small electric quad than a scooter. Off the line it surges with intent, and mid-throttle roll-ons are addictive. Crucially, the power is anchored by those four tyres; when you punch the throttle hard, the scooter just digs in and goes, rather than trying to lift or wiggle. On fast sweepers, you can lean and maintain throttle with a calmness you rarely get on high-powered two-wheelers. Hill starts? You simply stop worrying about them.
The GOTRAX GX3 counters with its dual motors and a very lively character. Acceleration in the higher power modes is properly entertaining: you pull the throttle, the front lightens, and you're very aware you're standing on a narrow vehicle going car-like urban speeds. It climbs hills with ease and keeps pace with city traffic instead of being bullied by it. There's enough torque to make you grin and enough top-end speed to make your eyes water if you stay there too long.
The difference is in how controlled that performance feels. On the GX3, you're balancing athletic power and a relatively tall, narrow chassis. It's fun, but you are always managing the bike a little. On the MIA, the extra contact patches and low-drama chassis let you use more of the performance more of the time. The X2 is also known for a fairly aggressive throttle mapping, so you still need a smooth wrist, but the underlying stability makes the whole experience feel more secure.
Braking tells a similar story. The X2's proper hydraulic discs on four planted wheels allow you to brake very hard without provoking drama. You feel the scooter squat and slow, not dive and twitch. The GX3's combination of mechanical discs and electronic assistance is strong for its class, and will haul you down from speed convincingly, but you're always more aware that one mistake in weight transfer or grip can get interesting. On the MIA, hard braking feels like a deliberate manoeuvre; on the GX3, it always carries a hint of "don't overdo it."
Battery & Range
On range, the two are closer than their marketing might suggest, but with distinct personalities.
The MIA FOUR X2's big, high-quality pack paired with a relatively efficient 4x2 drivetrain delivers genuinely respectable real-world distance, even if you give in to the temptation of the motors. You can comfortably plan longer commutes or half-day rides without feeling like you're permanently in eco jail. Crucially, the swappable battery changes the entire game: if you invest in a spare, range anxiety basically disappears. You ride, swap, ride again - the scooter can easily outlast you.
The GOTRAX GX3 boasts an impressive claimed figure, but when you ride it the way it begs to be ridden - in higher modes, plenty of throttle, mixed terrain - the usable range settles into a solid but less spectacular bracket. For most riders that still means a full day of normal commuting or a long recreational ride without babying it, but it doesn't quite live up to the marketing headline unless you nurse the throttle and avoid hills.
Charging is another subtle difference. The GX3's dual chargers are convenient: you plug both in and overnight is plenty, even from low. Efficient and straightforward. The MIA's single standard charger takes a similar workday / overnight window, but because you can take just the battery inside, you're far more likely to actually keep it topped up - especially if the scooter lives in a shed, car, or shared garage. In daily life, that swappability is worth more than an extra claimed few kilometres on paper.
Portability & Practicality
Let's be blunt: neither of these is "portable" in the usual scooter sense. If your definition of portable is "carry it up three floors while holding a coffee", close this tab and go look at sub-20 kg commuters.
The GOTRAX GX3 is heavy, tall and wide enough that you handle it like a small moped. Folding helps for car transport and storage, but you still need a decent boot and a strong back. Manoeuvring it in tight corridors or stairwells is a sweaty, awkward affair. As long as you roll it straight out of a garage or ground-floor bike room, it's fine; start adding stairs and you'll quickly regret your life choices.
The MIA FOUR X2 is even more of a "you live at ground level or forget it" machine - but it's honest about it. The folded package is surprisingly flat for what it is and slides nicely into larger car boots or vans, but this is absolutely not a scooter you shoulder-carry. Where it claws back practicality is charging and day-to-day convenience: leave the muddy machine outside, bring only the battery in. That single detail makes ownership much more civilised, especially in European flats where dragging a 40+ kg, dirt-caked vehicle through the hallway is... frowned upon.
In tight urban spaces, the GX3's narrower stance can thread bike lanes and bollards more naturally, while the MIA's width requires a bit more planning. On the flip side, the MIA feels happier rolling over kerbs, ramps and rough shortcuts that might make a two-wheeler wobble. So: GX3 is more practical where literal width matters; MIA is more practical where terrain is the problem.
Safety
Safety is where the MIA FOUR X2 stops being just "another fast scooter" and starts feeling like a different category of vehicle.
Four wheels mean four contact patches. When you brake hard, weight shifts forward but the chassis stays composed, without that unnerving tendency of some powerful scooters to feel like they're trying to pivot around the front tyre. On slippery surfaces - wet leaves, tram tracks, gravel over tarmac - the X2 remains astonishingly calm. You still respect physics, but you're much less one tiny mistake away from a crash. Add in a long wheelbase, serious hydraulic brakes and bright, integrated lighting, and you get something that feels much closer to a small, road-going vehicle than a hobby scooter.
The GOTRAX GX3 is, in isolation, a safe design for its class. Big tyres boost grip, the chassis is reassuringly stiff, high-speed wobble is notably absent, and the lights are actually good enough to see by, not just to be seen. UL certification for the electrical system is a welcome layer of peace of mind. As two-wheeled performance scooters go, it's on the safer, more confidence-inspiring side.
But there's no escaping the basic equation: two wheels versus four. When things get ugly - emergency braking on wet cobbles, unexpected pothole mid-corner - the MIA gives you a significantly bigger margin for error. For riders who've already had a scare or a fall on conventional scooters, that difference is not theoretical; it's the reason they're shopping for something like the X2 in the first place.
Community Feedback
| MIA FOUR X2 (4x2) | GOTRAX GX3 |
|---|---|
What riders love
|
What riders love
|
What riders complain about
|
What riders complain about
|
Price & Value
On sticker price, this is not a fair fight: the GOTRAX GX3 costs only a fraction of the MIA FOUR X2. If you're purely shopping by bank balance, the GX3 looks like a steal: dual motors, hydraulic suspension, long range, good lights, decent build, long warranty - all for what many brands charge for a fancy commuter.
The MIA FOUR X2, on the other hand, sits firmly in the "that's as much as a small used car" category. But context matters. You're not paying just for speed and battery; you're paying for a completely different platform: tilting quad geometry, sophisticated suspension hardware, four wheels, premium battery cells, and a design that is closer to a micro-vehicle than a scooter. In that light, it's less about raw price and more about what problem you're solving. If the X2 prevents even one serious crash, or comfortably replaces a car for years, the cost starts to make uncomfortable but rational sense.
Value, then, splits like this: the GX3 offers excellent performance-per-Euro; the MIA offers safety, comfort and engineering-per-Euro. For someone simply wanting to go fast and far on a budget, the GX3 is the obvious value pick. For someone wanting to ride hard, often, on bad roads, with minimal fear, the MIA justifies its premium more convincingly than the number on the invoice suggests.
Service & Parts Availability
GOTRAX has the advantage of scale. It operates in mainstream retail, has a big installed base, and for the GX3 backs things up with an unusually generous warranty in this segment. Parts like tyres, brakes and basic hardware are easy enough to source, and official spares and support are reasonably accessible in Europe through dealers and distributors. You may not get white-glove treatment, but you do get a proper supply chain.
MIA Dynamics runs a different model: lower volume, more specialised product, and a network of niche dealers who know the machine well. The upside is that when you talk to them, you're typically dealing with people who actually understand the scooter and its quirks. Owners report responsive, human support. The downside is that you're dealing with a more specialised platform: some parts are proprietary, and you're not picking them up at the local bike shop. On the flip side, the open, mechanical layout actually makes inspection and DIY maintenance easier than many plastic-clad scooters, if you're comfortable with spanners.
So: GOTRAX wins on mass-market breadth and ease; MIA feels more boutique but better informed. Which you prefer depends on whether you want "big brand process" or "smaller brand expertise".
Pros & Cons Summary
| MIA FOUR X2 (4x2) | GOTRAX GX3 |
|---|---|
Pros
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
Cons
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | MIA FOUR X2 (4x2) | GOTRAX GX3 |
|---|---|---|
| Motor power (nominal/peak) | Dual hub, up to 3.600 W peak | Dual 2 x 1.000 W (2.000 W nominal) |
| Top speed | Up to 72 km/h (limited in many regions) | Up to 61,1 km/h |
| Claimed range | Up to 80 km | Ca. 88,5-96,5 km |
| Real-world range (approx.) | Ca. 50-60 km | Ca. 45 km (Turbo use) |
| Battery | 60 V 25 Ah (1.500 Wh) LG, swappable | 54 V 25 Ah (1.350 Wh) Li-ion |
| Charging time | Ca. 5-6 h (standard charger) | Ca. 7,5 h (dual chargers) |
| Weight | Ca. 41,3 kg | Ca. 42,6 kg |
| Max load | 136 kg | 136 kg |
| Brakes | Front & rear dual hydraulic discs (140 mm) | Front & rear disc + electromagnetic |
| Suspension | Full double wishbone, front & rear | Dual adjustable hydraulic suspension |
| Tyres | Ca. 14,5 inch pneumatic | 11 x 3 inch pneumatic off-road |
| Wheels | Four-wheel tilting platform | Two wheels |
| Water resistance | Not officially specified, rugged build | IP54 |
| Dimensions unfolded (L x W x H) | 1.244 x 689 x 1.190 mm | Ca. 1.219 x 686 x 1.346 mm |
| Folded height | Ca. 450 mm | Stem folds, large footprint |
| Climbing grade | Up to ca. 20° | Strong hill performance (no exact grade) |
| Price (approx.) | Ca. 5.551 € | Ca. 1.637 € |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
If we strip away the spec sheets and look at how these scooters feel to live with and ride hard, the MIA FOUR X2 (4x2) is the more complete, more mature machine. It's absurdly stable, genuinely comfortable over awful surfaces, and feels like something you could ride every day for years without constantly negotiating with fear. It costs a small fortune, but you can see and feel where that money went every time you hit a patch of broken tarmac at speed and the scooter simply shrugs.
The GOTRAX GX3, by contrast, is the best kind of sensible excess: huge performance, decent range, solid build, all at a price that doesn't require a second mortgage. It's a superb choice if you want to step into big-power territory without diving into boutique money, and you're happy to accept the compromises of a heavy, two-wheeled bruiser with a few software quirks.
If safety, comfort and long-term "I trust this thing with my bones" factor are your top priorities - and your budget can handle it - go for the MIA FOUR X2. If your wallet is shouting, you still want to go very fast, and you're confident on two wheels, the GOTRAX GX3 is a compelling, high-value alternative. But if I had to pick one to keep and ride daily on real European streets, with their tram tracks, cobbles and surprise potholes, I'd take the keys to the MIA and not look back.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | MIA FOUR X2 (4x2) | GOTRAX GX3 |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ❌ 3,70 €/Wh | ✅ 1,21 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ❌ 77,10 €/km/h | ✅ 26,79 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ✅ 27,52 g/Wh | ❌ 31,56 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | ✅ 0,57 kg/km/h | ❌ 0,70 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ❌ 100,93 €/km | ✅ 36,38 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ✅ 0,75 kg/km | ❌ 0,95 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ✅ 27,27 Wh/km | ❌ 30,00 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ✅ 50,00 W/km/h | ❌ 32,74 W/km/h |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | ✅ 0,0115 kg/W | ❌ 0,0213 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ✅ 272,73 W | ❌ 180,00 W |
These metrics answer ten very specific questions: how much you pay and carry for each unit of energy, speed and range; how efficient each scooter is; how much power you get relative to weight and speed; and how quickly you can refill the battery. Lower "per-unit" numbers are better for cost, weight and efficiency; higher values win for power density and charging speed. Taken together, they show the GX3 as the clear money-efficiency champion, while the MIA leans heavily into performance density and energy efficiency at the cost of a far higher upfront price.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | MIA FOUR X2 (4x2) | GOTRAX GX3 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ✅ Slightly lighter overall | ❌ Heavier and bulkier |
| Range | ✅ Better real use + swap | ❌ Shorter practical range |
| Max Speed | ✅ Faster top-end potential | ❌ Slightly slower overall |
| Power | ✅ Stronger peak output | ❌ Less power on tap |
| Battery Size | ✅ Larger, higher voltage pack | ❌ Slightly smaller capacity |
| Suspension | ✅ Superior wishbone system | ❌ Good but less advanced |
| Design | ✅ Unique, vehicle-like look | ❌ Generic performance style |
| Safety | ✅ Four wheels, massive stability | ❌ Two wheels, less forgiving |
| Practicality | ✅ Swappable battery, flat fold | ❌ Fixed pack, tall folded |
| Comfort | ✅ Class-leading ride comfort | ❌ Very good, but harsher |
| Features | ✅ Tilting quad, app options | ❌ No app, fewer tricks |
| Serviceability | ✅ Exposed hardware, easy access | ❌ More closed, brand-driven |
| Customer Support | ✅ Personal, niche-dealer touch | ❌ Big-brand mixed reports |
| Fun Factor | ✅ Carving, quad-like thrills | ❌ Fast, but more ordinary |
| Build Quality | ✅ Feels overbuilt, premium | ❌ Strong but more basic |
| Component Quality | ✅ Higher-end cells, hardware | ❌ More cost-conscious parts |
| Brand Name | ❌ Niche, less well-known | ✅ Mainstream, widely recognised |
| Community | ❌ Smaller, enthusiast niche | ✅ Large, active user base |
| Lights (visibility) | ✅ Wide stance, big presence | ❌ Narrower, less visual mass |
| Lights (illumination) | ✅ Strong dual headlights | ✅ Very good main headlight |
| Acceleration | ✅ Stronger, more planted pull | ❌ Powerful but twitchier |
| Arrive with smile factor | ✅ Massive grin every ride | ❌ Fun, but less special |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ✅ Far less fatigue, calmer | ❌ More tiring, two-wheel buzz |
| Charging speed | ✅ Faster average refill | ❌ Slower despite dual ports |
| Reliability | ✅ Overbuilt chassis, quality cells | ❌ More budget-focused build |
| Folded practicality | ✅ Flatter, easier to load | ❌ Tall, awkward footprint |
| Ease of transport | ❌ Heavy, wide to manoeuvre | ✅ Narrower, easier to roll |
| Handling | ✅ Stable, confidence-inspiring | ❌ Good, but more nervous |
| Braking performance | ✅ Four-wheel braking confidence | ❌ Strong but less planted |
| Riding position | ✅ Natural, low-stress stance | ❌ Tall deck, more strain |
| Handlebar quality | ✅ Rock-solid, no flex | ❌ Good but less refined |
| Throttle response | ❌ Strong, a bit abrupt | ✅ Sporty yet manageable |
| Dashboard / Display | ✅ Functional, vehicle-like | ❌ Cluttered buttons, poor manual |
| Security (locking) | ✅ Quad frame, easy anchor | ❌ Standard scooter locking |
| Weather protection | ✅ Rugged build, better sealing | ❌ Basic IP54, exposed bits |
| Resale value | ✅ Unique, niche demand | ❌ Mass-market, faster devalue |
| Tuning potential | ✅ Enthusiast platform to tweak | ❌ More locked-down ecosystem |
| Ease of maintenance | ❌ More parts, more work | ✅ Simpler two-wheel layout |
| Value for Money | ❌ Expensive, niche purchase | ✅ Outstanding performance value |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the MIA FOUR X2 (4x2) scores 7 points against the GOTRAX GX3's 3. In the Author's Category Battle, the MIA FOUR X2 (4x2) gets 33 ✅ versus 7 ✅ for GOTRAX GX3.
Totals: MIA FOUR X2 (4x2) scores 40, GOTRAX GX3 scores 10.
Based on the scoring, the MIA FOUR X2 (4x2) is our overall winner. Riding both back to back, the MIA FOUR X2 simply feels like the more sorted, grown-up answer to real-world roads and real-world fear - it glides where others crash, and that calm confidence is addictive. The GOTRAX GX3 fights hard with sheer value and raw fun, but it never quite escapes its roots as a very good two-wheeler trying to punch above its price. If you want a machine that feels like it's on your side every second, the MIA is the one that stays with you in your head long after you park it. The GX3 will make you smile, but the X2 will make you wonder why you ever accepted less.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.

