Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
The MIA FOUR X2 (4x2) is the overall winner here if you care most about stability, comfort and "I'd-like-to-keep-my-collarbones-intact" safety, while still getting genuinely wild performance. It feels like a small, leaning ATV for the city - outrageously plush, confidence-inspiring and almost unfairly forgiving on bad roads.
The NAMI BURN-E 2 hits harder on raw speed, range and price-to-performance, and is the better choice for experienced riders who want a classic hyper-scooter feel: towering power, long legs, insane tuning options and a chassis that begs for big mileage. It just demands more rider skill and respect.
If your brain says "I want a car replacement that won't try to kill me on wet tram tracks", go MIA. If your heart screams "I want to chase motorbikes up mountain passes", go NAMI.
Stick around for the full breakdown - the trade-offs between these two are fascinating, and they could easily push you in one direction or the other.
Riding the MIA FOUR X2 and the NAMI BURN-E 2 back-to-back is a bit like hopping from a rally-prepped side-by-side into a tuned sport bike. Both are brutally capable, both are very fast, but they approach the idea of "serious scooter" from completely different angles.
The MIA FOUR X2 is the one you pick when you're sick of being scared of gravel, wet leaves and tram tracks. It's the scooter for riders who want maximum fun with minimum drama.
The NAMI BURN-E 2 is the one you pick when you want to surf that fine line between "this is incredible" and "I should probably slow down before I meet paramedics". It's the scooter for riders who already know exactly what 70-plus on a deck feels like - and still want more.
On paper they live in the same broad performance universe; on the road they answer very different questions. Let's dig into which one actually fits your life - not just your ego.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
These two don't look like direct rivals at first glance. One has four huge wheels and a tilting quad chassis, the other is a more traditional twin-motor hyper scooter with an exposed tubular frame. Yet they absolutely live in the same mental shopping basket: "I want a proper, no-compromise, high-end scooter that can replace a car for a lot of trips."
They sit in the upper performance and price bracket, aimed at riders who've long outgrown entry-level toys. Both will cruise at speeds that feel more like small motorcycle territory than "last-mile device". Both are happy doing long commutes instead of quick hops to the bakery.
The main difference is philosophy: MIA spends its R&D budget on stability and suspension geometry; NAMI spends it on chassis stiffness, electronics and high-end controls. Same destination - serious, fast, long-range scooting - but two very different roads to get there.
Design & Build Quality
Park them side by side and you immediately see two completely different design languages.
The MIA FOUR X2 looks like a shrunken Dakar buggy. Four big 14,5-inch tyres, exposed double-wishbone arms and a wide stance that screams "I climb kerbs for fun." The frame mixes metal and reinforced polymer, and everything that matters is unapologetically on display: linkages, shocks, brake hardware. It feels over-built in that "I don't care what winter throws at me" way. Grab the bars, rock it back and forth - there's a tank-like solidity and zero stem play. The tilting mechanism feels like proper engineering, not a novelty hinge.
The NAMI BURN-E 2, in contrast, is pure industrial sculpture: a welded tubular aluminium frame wrapped tightly around the battery, carbon fibre steering column, and almost no cosmetic plastics. It looks like a prototype that somehow escaped into mass production. The welds are chunky and reassuring, the deck hardware is serious, and the huge centre display gives the cockpit a high-end motorbike vibe. The folding neck clamp is one of the few in this class that actually feels like it was designed by someone who rides hard, not by an accountant with a CAD licence.
In the hands, the MIA feels like a compact off-road machine - lots of structural width, wide deck, loads of hardware around your feet. The NAMI feels slimmer, taller and more "bike-like": big bars, long deck, but less visual weight around the wheels. Both give off an aura of premium engineering, but with slightly different accents: MIA leans toward mechanical complexity and clever geometry; NAMI leans toward electronics, tuning and brute chassis stiffness.
Ride Comfort & Handling
This is where the two machines part ways completely - and where the MIA quietly steals a lot of hearts.
The FOUR X2's comfort comes from a simple recipe done exceptionally well: oversized tyres and a proper double-wishbone suspension at each end. On rough city pavement - cracked slabs, brickwork, lazy road repairs - it just glides. You feel the texture of the surface, but not the violence. Hit a pothole that would send a normal scooter into a nervous twitch and the MIA just gives you a gentle "thud" and carries on. After a long ride over cobbles and nasty side streets, my knees and lower back felt suspiciously... fine.
Cornering on the MIA is an event in itself. The tilting quad system lets the whole chassis lean like a normal scooter, but you've got four contact patches instead of two. You tip it in and feel this secure, planted grip that's frankly addictive. On loose gravel paths you can carve like you're on rails instead of tiptoeing and praying. Handling is intuitive: lean, steer lightly, and the chassis follows without drama.
The NAMI's comfort is all about those adjustable hydraulic coil shocks. Proper long-travel units front and rear soak up big hits and high-frequency chatter really well. Dial them softer and the scooter turns rough tarmac into something that feels almost freshly paved. Dial them firmer and the chassis stays composed at silly speeds. On long rides, the wide deck and good bar height make it easy to shift stance and stay relaxed.
But handling is more demanding than on the MIA. The BURN-E 2 is a powerful, tall, two-wheeled missile; you're balancing more, especially at low speed or on broken surfaces. At pace it's wonderfully stable, but push into a bumpy corner and you need to know what you're doing with weight transfer and throttle finesse. Get it right and it feels like a precision tool; get it wrong and it reminds you you're on two wheels, not a quad.
If you hate being constantly "on guard" about surface changes, the MIA's four-wheel stability and geometry feel like a cheat code. If you love an engaging, sporty two-wheeled ride and don't mind working a bit for your fun, the NAMI is deeply rewarding.
Performance
Both scooters belong to the "this would have been science fiction ten years ago" class of performance - but they serve it differently.
The MIA FOUR X2 uses a dual-motor drive that pushes out serious peak power. Off the line it doesn't just move, it lurches forward with the kind of shove that makes you instinctively lean back. The throttle mapping out of the box is on the enthusiastic side; crack it open impatiently and the scooter is more than happy to oblige with a big surge. Once you get used to feeding in the power smoothly, acceleration is addictive without being terrifying. The top-speed zone is easily fast enough to get you into motorcycle territory if local laws and self-preservation allow.
Because it's "only" driving two of the four wheels, the sensation under power is distinctly rear-biased: it feels like a sporty rear-drive car, pushing you out of corners rather than yanking you by the handlebars. Combined with that mega traction from four tyres, it means you can accelerate hard even on slightly sketchy surfaces without the same wheelspin jitters you get from some powerful two-wheelers.
The NAMI, on the other hand, is a masterclass in how to deliver big power gracefully. Dual motors and those beefy sine-wave controllers give you a spread of torque that feels endless - but critically, controllable. You can creep behind pedestrians at walking pace as if it's a rental scooter, then roll your thumb a bit further and it lunges forward with sport-bike urgency. Mid-range punch is ferocious; overtakes are over almost before your brain has fully processed the decision.
Flat-out, the NAMI stretches its legs further than the MIA. It's got more headroom at the top and feels like it could sit at speeds that, frankly, I'd rather do sitting down with a fuel tank between my knees. Hill climbs are almost comical - you don't think about gradients, you just go. Load it up with a heavy rider and steep streets and it still charges upwards without that depressing mid-slope fade you get on weaker machines.
Braking performance on both is strong, but the flavour is different. The MIA's big hydraulic discs on four wheels let you really grab brakes without the front doing that "I'm about to tuck" dance. Emergency stops feel brutally effective yet very stable. The NAMI combines solid hydraulic brakes with powerful regenerative braking you can tune - dialled up, you can do most of your slowing just by rolling off the throttle, which is brilliant in traffic and saves your pads.
If your priority is outright speed and devastating acceleration on good tarmac, the NAMI takes it. If you want serious pace but always with that sensation that the chassis has your back, the MIA's four-wheel platform is hard to beat.
Battery & Range
On battery tech, both scooters play in the grown-up league, but the NAMI is the distance runner here.
The MIA FOUR X2 packs a high-quality LG pack with plenty of voltage and capacity for real-world, full-power rides. In everyday use - mixed speeds, some hills, not babying the throttle - it comfortably covers a good commuter's day without giving you sweaty-palmed range anxiety. Hammer it relentlessly and the range drops, of course, but you're still in "serious trip" territory, not "just around the block".
The NAMI's battery, however, is bigger and runs at a higher system voltage. In practice, that means it keeps delivering strong acceleration deeper into the discharge curve and will simply go further per charge when ridden in a similar fashion. Ride briskly but not like a teenager on TikTok and you're talking long-day, multi-stop usefulness. Ride it gently and you're into "I really should stop for coffee just for my legs, not for the battery" territory.
One ace up the MIA's sleeve: the battery is swappable. You can pop the pack out, carry it upstairs like a slightly heavy briefcase and charge indoors. For people in flats without ground-floor power, that's pure gold. It also means that if you cough up for a second pack, your "range" becomes more about wallet and backpack space than capacity.
Charging speed is comparable in the real world. The NAMI's dual charge ports let you reduce downtime if you invest in faster chargers, while the MIA's more moderate capacity means a full refill overnight or during a workday is no drama. If your priority is maximum range per charge, NAMI wins. If your life revolves around removable batteries and modular range, the MIA makes a very strong case.
Portability & Practicality
Let's be very clear: neither of these is a "throw it over your shoulder and hop on the tram" scooter. They are both heavy, both bulky, and both happier on the ground than in your arms.
The MIA FOUR X2, despite being lighter than its full 4x4 sibling, is still a substantial piece of machinery. The quad stance means it takes up more width than a typical scooter, both when parked and when you're trying to thread it through cluttered hallways or bike racks. Folded, it becomes low and relatively flat rather than compact; great for sliding into an estate car, less great for tiny city car boots. Carrying it up more than a short flight of stairs is firmly in "gym workout" territory.
The NAMI BURN-E 2 is taller and a touch heavier again. When folded, it's like trying to manoeuvre a sleeping, expensive giraffe: long, a bit unwieldy and definitely a two-hand operation. The handlebars are wide, the frame is dense, and that big battery makes every kilogram feel very real. You can get it into the back of a decent-sized car, but it's not something you'll want to do twice a day.
Day-to-day practicality, though, is where they diverge. The MIA's removable battery makes life far easier if your parking spot and your plug socket don't live in the same postcode. Its four-wheel stance is also brilliant for low-speed manoeuvres - creeping through tight courtyards, reversing out of awkward parking, doing U-turns on narrow paths. It behaves more like a small mobility vehicle than a twitchy scooter.
The NAMI fights back with better weather protection and a more conventional footprint in bike lanes and cycle infrastructure. It's narrower than the MIA, threads through bollards more easily and feels less like you're smuggling a quad into cyclist territory. The IP rating and sealed electronics mean you're less stressed about sudden showers, and the lighting and horn package are much more in line with "serious traffic participant" than "toy".
In short: neither is portable in the commuter-scooter sense. If you need removable battery and slow-speed stability, MIA. If you need better integration with bike lanes and rain-friendly electronics, NAMI.
Safety
Both scooters take safety much more seriously than the average fast toy - but once again, their approaches are different.
The MIA FOUR X2's biggest safety feature is simply physics: four wheels instead of two. Hard braking feels controlled and drama-free; you can really squeeze those big hydraulic discs without the rear threatening to lift or the front tyre giving you that heart-stopping slide. Cross a patch of wet leaves or tram rails at a bad angle and you feel a wiggle, not a full panic moment. The tilting mechanism keeps your centre of gravity where it should be in corners, which massively reduces the chance of washing out if you misjudge entry speed.
Visibility on the MIA is better than most scooters purely because of footprint: it's wider, chunkier, and cars register you as "a thing" rather than a skinny silhouette. Integrated lighting is good, though not spectacular; it does the job and benefits from the scooter's bulk making you more noticeable.
The NAMI builds safety more like a motorbike: ultra-rigid frame and stem, excellent brakes and very serious lights. The one-piece welded frame and carbon stem mean there's virtually no flex when you load the bars under braking - that alone goes a long way to preventing the dreaded speed wobble. The Logan hydraulic brakes, combined with strong, adjustable regen, allow calm, predictable stopping from high speeds.
Where the NAMI absolutely embarrasses most of the market is lighting. The high-mounted, extremely bright headlight actually lets you ride at night at real-world speeds without feeling like you're outrunning your lights. The deck-level running lights and clear brake light and indicators make you look like a proper vehicle from behind, not an afterthought.
The catch: at high speeds on rough surfaces, without an aftermarket steering damper, the NAMI can get nervous. It's not a design flaw so much as physics meeting aggressive riding - but it does mean that, pushed hard, the BURN-E 2 demands more rider skill and a bit of extra investment in a damper to be its safest self.
If your idea of safety is "please don't punish my small mistakes too harshly", the MIA is the more forgiving platform. If your idea of safety is "give me rock-solid hardware, monster lights and powerful brakes, and I'll handle the rest", the NAMI delivers in spades - with the caveat that you have to respect it.
Community Feedback
| MIA FOUR X2 (4x2) | NAMI BURN-E 2 |
|---|---|
What riders love
|
What riders love
|
What riders complain about
|
What riders complain about
|
Price & Value
Let's talk wallets. The MIA FOUR X2 sits well into the high-end luxury bracket. You're paying not just for watt-hours and motors, but for a complicated, patented quad suspension system, four full-size wheels and a chassis concept that basically nobody else is offering. In sheer euros-per-spec terms, it cannot compete with the NAMI. In terms of what you get in ride experience for that money - especially if stability and comfort are your top priorities - it starts to look far more reasonable.
The NAMI BURN-E 2, by comparison, delivers obscene performance, range and hardware for a noticeably lower price. In the hyper-scooter segment it's widely seen as one of the better value propositions: you get a premium frame, big battery, sine-wave controllers and plush suspension for less money than many rivals that ride worse. Measured in "how much scooter do I get for each euro", the NAMI wins this round quite comfortably.
The real question is what you count as "value". If you want the most power and range per euro, NAMI. If you value the unique safety and comfort of a tilting four-wheeler - something that could easily prevent a crash or simply keep you riding for many more years - the MIA earns its keep in a way spec sheets don't fully capture.
Service & Parts Availability
NAMI has, by now, built up a decent global network of resellers and service partners, particularly across Europe and North America. Parts like brake pads, tyres, controllers and displays are relatively easy to source, and because the community is large and vocal, most issues and fixes are well documented. That makes long-term ownership feel reassuring: you're not betting on an obscure one-off.
MIA is more niche and geographically patchier. Enthusiast-oriented distributors have earned a good reputation for honest advice and post-sale support, and the open mechanical design makes a lot of maintenance straightforward if you're comfortable with tools. However, some components - particularly anything related to the tilting mechanism and proprietary bits - are obviously brand-specific. You'll want to buy from a dealer you trust, not some faceless online listing.
If having a large, established owner base and relatively easy access to parts matters most, the NAMI is the safer bet. If you're happy being in a smaller, more specialist ecosystem and accept the occasional wait for a specific part, the MIA's engineering is worth that trade-off.
Pros & Cons Summary
| MIA FOUR X2 (4x2) | NAMI BURN-E 2 |
|---|---|
Pros
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
Cons
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | MIA FOUR X2 (4x2) | NAMI BURN-E 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Motor power (rated / peak) | Dual hub, ca. 3.600 W peak | 2 x 1.000 W rated, ca. 5.000 W peak |
| Top speed | Ca. 72 km/h (factory claim) | Ca. 85 km/h (factory claim) |
| Battery voltage | 60 V | 72 V |
| Battery capacity | 25 Ah | 28 Ah |
| Battery energy | Ca. 1.500 Wh | 2.160 Wh |
| Claimed range | 80 km | 120 km |
| Real-world range (est.) | 50-60 km | Ca. 80 km |
| Weight | 41,3 kg | 45,0 kg |
| Max load | 136 kg | 120 kg |
| Brakes | Front & rear dual hydraulic discs | Logan hydraulic discs + regen |
| Suspension | Double wishbone, full shock absorption | Adjustable hydraulic coil-shocks, 165 mm |
| Tyres | 4 x 14,5" pneumatic | 2 x 11" tubeless pneumatic |
| Water resistance (IP) | Not officially stated, rugged build | IP55 |
| Charging time (typical) | Ca. 5-6 h | Ca. 6-12 h (charger-dependent) |
| Battery removable | Yes, swappable pack | No, fixed pack |
| Price (approx.) | 5.551 € | 3.435 € |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
Both of these scooters are fantastic at what they do - the trick is being honest about what you actually need and what kind of rider you are.
If you want the most complete, confidence-inspiring, "I can ride this through anything and still arrive relaxed" experience, the MIA FOUR X2 is the standout. Its stability, comfort and four-wheel grip change the way you ride in the real world. You stop fixating on every crack and patch of gravel, and you start simply enjoying the ride. For older riders, heavier riders, anyone with past crash trauma or just people who value peace of mind as much as speed, the MIA feels like the right kind of overkill.
If your priority is classic hyper-scooter thrills - towering acceleration, long range, huge tuning potential and a chassis that rewards a skilled rider - the NAMI BURN-E 2 is the sharper tool and the better deal financially. It's the enthusiast's choice: more power headroom, more range, better waterproofing, and a bigger, louder community behind it. It will happily do serious daily commuting and weekend canyon runs, provided you respect its weight and speed.
Put bluntly: if I had to recommend one single machine to the widest range of riders who want serious performance without constantly flirting with disaster, I'd lean toward the MIA FOUR X2. If I were advising a seasoned scooter nut who already knows how to handle a fast dual-motor beast and wants the best bang-for-buck thrill machine, I'd point them at the NAMI BURN-E 2 and tell them to budget for a steering damper and better tyres.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | MIA FOUR X2 (4x2) | NAMI BURN-E 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ❌ 3,70 €/Wh | ✅ 1,59 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ❌ 77,10 €/km/h | ✅ 40,41 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ❌ 27,53 g/Wh | ✅ 20,83 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | ❌ 0,57 kg/km/h | ✅ 0,53 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ❌ 100,93 €/km | ✅ 42,94 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ❌ 0,75 kg/km | ✅ 0,56 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ❌ 27,27 Wh/km | ✅ 27,00 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ❌ 50,00 W/km/h | ✅ 58,82 W/km/h |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | ❌ 0,0115 kg/W | ✅ 0,0090 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ✅ 272,73 W | ❌ 240,00 W |
These metrics let you see how efficiently each scooter turns money, weight, time and energy into real-world capability. The "per Wh" and "per km" figures show cost and weight efficiency, the Wh/km number is a rough measure of how thirsty each is, while the power-related ratios hint at how hard the motors can work relative to mass and top speed. The charging speed figure is simply how quickly you can stuff energy back into the pack - important if you regularly ride close to the limit of your range.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | MIA FOUR X2 (4x2) | NAMI BURN-E 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ✅ Lighter for this class | ❌ Heavier overall |
| Range | ❌ Solid but shorter | ✅ Goes significantly further |
| Max Speed | ❌ Fast but capped earlier | ✅ Higher top-end rush |
| Power | ❌ Strong, but slightly softer | ✅ More peak punch |
| Battery Size | ❌ Smaller overall pack | ✅ Bigger, higher-voltage pack |
| Suspension | ✅ Quad wishbones, ultra plush | ❌ Excellent but two-wheel only |
| Design | ✅ Unique quad, head-turning | ❌ More conventional hyper look |
| Safety | ✅ Four-wheel stability, forgiving | ❌ Demands more rider skill |
| Practicality | ✅ Removable battery, easy charging | ❌ Fixed pack, needs plug nearby |
| Comfort | ✅ Rolls like luxury sofa | ❌ Very comfy, more demanding |
| Features | ❌ Fewer electronic toys | ✅ Rich display, tuning options |
| Serviceability | ❌ More moving parts, niche | ✅ Simpler layout, known platform |
| Customer Support | ✅ Strong via specialist dealers | ✅ Good via major resellers |
| Fun Factor | ✅ Carving quad, grin machine | ❌ Fun but more intense |
| Build Quality | ✅ Overbuilt, solid feel | ✅ Welded frame, premium feel |
| Component Quality | ✅ LG cells, solid hardware | ✅ Quality shocks, controllers |
| Brand Name | ❌ Smaller, more niche | ✅ Strong enthusiast reputation |
| Community | ❌ Smaller, more specialised | ✅ Large, active rider base |
| Lights (visibility) | ❌ Good but unspectacular | ✅ Excellent, very visible |
| Lights (illumination) | ❌ Adequate city usage | ✅ Proper night-riding beam |
| Acceleration | ❌ Strong, slightly tamer | ✅ Harder, more brutal |
| Arrive with smile factor | ✅ Huge grin, low stress | ❌ Grin plus mild adrenaline |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ✅ Very relaxed, low fatigue | ❌ Engaging, slightly tiring |
| Charging speed | ✅ Faster per Wh filled | ❌ Slower per Wh overall |
| Reliability | ❌ More complexity, more checks | ✅ Proven, simpler architecture |
| Folded practicality | ❌ Wide, awkward footprint | ❌ Long, bulky package |
| Ease of transport | ❌ Heavy, quad width | ❌ Heavy, tall, unwieldy |
| Handling | ✅ Forgiving, stable, intuitive | ❌ Sharper, needs experience |
| Braking performance | ✅ Four-wheel grip under braking | ❌ Great, but two-wheel limits |
| Riding position | ✅ Relaxed, natural stance | ✅ Sporty, roomy deck |
| Handlebar quality | ✅ Rock-solid, no wobble | ✅ Wide, stable cockpit |
| Throttle response | ❌ Can feel too aggressive | ✅ Smooth, tunable sine-wave |
| Dashboard / Display | ❌ Functional, nothing fancy | ✅ Large, feature-rich screen |
| Security (locking) | ✅ Wider, harder to shift | ✅ Popular, many lock options |
| Weather protection | ❌ Rugged but unspecified IP | ✅ IP55, proven in rain |
| Resale value | ❌ Niche, smaller buyer pool | ✅ Strong demand used |
| Tuning potential | ❌ More mechanical than digital | ✅ Huge electronic adjustability |
| Ease of maintenance | ❌ Complex suspension geometry | ✅ Simpler, familiar layout |
| Value for Money | ❌ Expensive for raw specs | ✅ Excellent performance per euro |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the MIA FOUR X2 (4x2) scores 1 point against the NAMI BURN-E 2's 9. In the Author's Category Battle, the MIA FOUR X2 (4x2) gets 18 ✅ versus 25 ✅ for NAMI BURN-E 2 (with a few ties sprinkled in).
Totals: MIA FOUR X2 (4x2) scores 19, NAMI BURN-E 2 scores 34.
Based on the scoring, the NAMI BURN-E 2 is our overall winner. For me as a rider, the MIA FOUR X2 edges this battle because it delivers serious performance in a way that feels effortlessly safe, deeply comfortable and welcoming even on the worst city surfaces. It's the scooter that makes you want to take the long way home simply because you know it will be fun, not fatiguing. The NAMI BURN-E 2 is the more obvious spec-sheet hero and a brilliant machine in its own right, but the MIA's combination of stability, comfort and sheer "relaxed grin" factor makes it the one I'd most happily live with day in, day out.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.