Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
The MIA FOUR X2 (4x2) is the overall winner here: it rides like a small, tilting tank on four wheels, with absurd stability, wonderfully plush suspension and a "forget-the-road-cracks-exist" comfort that the ZERO 10X simply cannot match. If you want maximum safety, confidence on awful surfaces, and a scooter that genuinely feels like a long-term vehicle rather than a toy, the MIA is the better choice.
The ZERO 10X still makes sense if you want big performance on a tighter budget, enjoy tinkering and mods, and mostly ride on reasonably decent tarmac. It is raw, fun, and powerful-but also a bit old-school in its compromises.
If you can stretch the budget and live with the weight and width, go MIA FOUR X2. If your wallet or storage space say "no chance", the ZERO 10X remains a punchy, entertaining alternative.
Read on for the deep dive-this is where the differences really start to matter.
Modern performance scooters have split into two tribes: the light, nervous two-wheel rockets, and the heavy, planted "mini-motorbikes". The MIA FOUR X2 (4x2) walks in and says: "Why not both... but on four wheels?" Meanwhile the ZERO 10X is the long-standing cult hero of the dual-motor, mid-price world-a scooter that has hauled more riders out of Xiaomi-land and into proper power than almost any other.
On paper, both promise serious speed, real-world commuting range and suspension that laughs at potholes. In reality, they feel very different: the MIA is like stepping into a new category of vehicle, while the 10X is a familiar, slightly rough-edged muscle scooter you can wrench on in your garage.
If you are trying to decide whether to go all-in on the futuristic tilting quad or stick to the proven two-wheel warhorse, keep reading-because which one you should buy has less to do with top speed, and far more to do with how you want your brain and body to feel at the end of a ride.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
These two don't live in the budget aisle. They sit in the serious-rider segment: proper dual-motor (or dual-driven) machines, real suspension, decent batteries, and enough speed to make you seriously consider buying better gloves.
The MIA FOUR X2 targets riders who want maximum stability, comfort and safety-even at silly speeds-and who are prepared to pay a premium for engineering that borders on mad science: four wheels, a tilting chassis, double wishbones, massive tyres, and a swappable battery system.
The ZERO 10X lives in the "performance for sensible money" lane. It offers big acceleration, strong hill climbing and genuinely plush suspension at a fraction of the MIA's price. It has a huge modding community and feels more like a hot hatch tuned in someone's shed than a factory-engineered moon rover.
They compete because a lot of riders sit exactly between these worlds: you want proper power and comfort, something that can replace a car for city use, but you're trying to decide whether to go for sheer value (10X) or take the leap into a different class of safety and ride quality (MIA).
Design & Build Quality
Put these two side by side and the family resemblance is basically "they both have handlebars". Everything else diverges.
The MIA FOUR X2 looks like it escaped from a robotics lab. Exposed double wishbones, huge arms, big 14,5-inch tyres and a wide, purposeful stance-it's more lunar rover than scooter. The chassis feels overbuilt, in a good way: minimal flex, no stem wobble, and components that look sized for abuse rather than just spec sheets. The polymer-metal hybrid frame and open mechanical layout make everything feel serviceable and solid, not fragile.
The ZERO 10X, by contrast, is classic performance scooter design: single stem, chunky aluminium deck, single-sided swing arms and visible springs. It has that industrial, DIY-friendly charm. The frame itself is sturdy and battle-tested, but you also feel its age a bit: the infamous folding clamp, flex that creeps in over time, and a general "tighten that bolt again" ownership rhythm. It's tough enough, but not what I'd call sophisticated.
In hand, the MIA's cockpit feels more premium and confidence-inspiring: the stem is fat and rigid, the bars feel rock-solid, and the controls suit the scooter's "serious vehicle" character. The 10X cockpit is busy and functional-QS-S style trigger, scattered buttons, classic cable routing. It's fine, but more "tuning project" than refined product.
If you like your hardware to feel like it was engineered, not assembled, the MIA is leagues ahead. The ZERO 10X wins only if you explicitly want something simpler and widely known, where rough edges are part of the charm.
Ride Comfort & Handling
This is where the gap stops being theoretical and starts being felt in your knees and spine.
The MIA FOUR X2 floats. Those enormous tyres roll over holes that swallow normal scooter wheels, and the double wishbone suspension keeps each wheel tracking the ground independently. On broken city streets, you simply stop caring about cracks, expansion joints and random gravel. Even on long cobblestone stretches, it feels more like a gentle rocking motion than vibration. After a long commute, you step off feeling surprisingly fresh-legs relaxed, no buzzing feet.
Handling is the real party trick: the tilting mechanism lets you lean into turns like a normal scooter, but with four contact patches. You carve corners with this weird mix of confidence and childlike glee-like having training wheels that somehow do not ruin the fun. In fast sweepers or bumpy curves, the chassis just stays calm. You don't get that queasy "if I hit a hidden pothole now, I'm going down" headache you always have on powerful two-wheelers.
The ZERO 10X is genuinely comfortable for a classic scooter. Its long-travel spring-hydraulic suspension soaks up potholes and kerb drops impressively, and the fat tyres add a big cushion of air. On half-decent roads, it's beautifully plush; on broken ones, it's still infinitely better than small-wheel commuters. But you do feel more pitch and bounce: dive under braking, squat under acceleration, and a bit of pogoing over repeated bumps if you push hard. After a fast 20 km on rough surfaces, you know you've been working.
In tight corners, the 10X is agile and actually fun to flick around once you trust the chassis, but you are always balancing. On sketchy surfaces-wet tiles, sand patches, leaf mulch-you instinctively back off. On the MIA, you don't need that constant mental tension: four wheels plus tilting dynamics make you far less nervous about imperfect traction.
Simply put: both are comfy, but the MIA moves the whole concept into "new category" territory. The ZERO 10X feels good; the MIA feels unfair.
Performance
Both scooters are fast enough that you should start thinking in terms of motorcycle protective gear, not "it's just a scooter, I'll be fine in sneakers". The flavour of that speed, though, is different.
The MIA FOUR X2's dual-hub setup pulls with the lazy authority of a big turbo diesel. You squeeze the throttle and it shoves; lean deeper, it keeps shoving. There's no wheelspin drama, just massive traction and a feeling that the chassis always has more grip than you're bold enough to use. Full throttle from standstill feels like being shoved forward by an invisible wall-including uphill. Top-speed runs are comically stable for something you're standing on. Your courage, not the scooter, is the limiting factor.
The ZERO 10X is more of a hot hatch. Dual-motor "Turbo/Dual" mode hits like a slap: instant surge, front end lightening, that slightly naughty sense that you probably shouldn't be doing this in a bike lane. Acceleration off the line is aggressive and grin-inducing; it absolutely destroys shallow hills and powers up steep ones without wheezing. But you do feel the front wheel go a bit lighter on bad surfaces, and you are very aware that a surprise pothole at full torque could ruin your day.
At higher speeds, the 10X is fast enough to embarrass mopeds, but it demands respect. On smooth tarmac, it's great fun, and once you cure any stem play it tracks straight. On imperfect surfaces, though, that classic single-stem, two-wheel structure always keeps a little voice in your head whispering: "Steady... steady..."
Braking is another key difference. The MIA's hydraulic discs on four wheels feel almost overbuilt: you can brake hard without the rear dancing or the front threatening to wash out. Emergency stops feel controlled, not like rolling the dice. The 10X with hydraulic brakes can also stop very strongly, but you're loading two contact patches, not four; grab too much lever on a dusty surface and you'll feel the front squirm. Mechanical-brake base versions, frankly, are under-braked for the kind of speed this scooter can do and really want upgrading or very measured riding.
If you equate fun purely with raw punch, the ZERO 10X will make you giggle. If you equate fun with attacking that same road without worrying about crashing every time the asphalt gets sketchy, the MIA takes it easily.
Battery & Range
On paper, both claim impressive ranges. In the real world-rider with a pulse using the power-the story shifts a bit.
The MIA FOUR X2 carries a hefty high-voltage pack of premium LG cells. Manufacturer talk of "up to around eighty kilometres" assumes you ride like you're escorting a wedding cake. Ride it like a normal human-mix of brisk blasts, urban traffic and a few hills-and you're realistically looking at a good half-hundred km, more if you're gentle, a bit less if you're constantly abusing the throttle.
The key with the MIA is the removable battery. You don't drag a forty-plus-kilo mud-splattered beast into your flat; you just pop the pack and carry it inside. You also have a clear upgrade path: buy a spare pack and your "range" becomes however many briefcase-sized bricks you're willing to own. Charging times are office-day friendly; plug it in at work, you're good to go home hard.
The ZERO 10X comes in several battery flavours. The bigger packs with quality cells give you broadly similar real-world reach to the MIA on mixed riding-enough for long city days or decent weekend tours. Hammer it in full dual-motor mode, and you can watch the voltmeter drop like a countdown timer, but you still get very usable distances for a performance scooter.
The downside is charging. On a standard charger, a large 10X pack is an overnight affair from low. Dual charging ports help a lot if you invest in a second charger, but you're still tied to where the scooter sits, not where you want to be. And there's no quick-swap option from the factory: when you're out, you're out.
Range anxiety itself is lower on both than on typical commuters, but the MIA feels more "future-proofed" thanks to that swappable brick. The 10X counters with decent efficiency for the power and a cheaper path to a big battery in the first place.
Portability & Practicality
Neither of these scooters is what you casually drag onto a tram between your knees and a backpack. They're both vehicles, not accessories. The differences are in how and where you can live with them.
The MIA FOUR X2 is heavy and wide. Carrying it up stairs solo is an instant test of life choices. It folds flat rather than compact, which is brilliant for sliding into a car boot or against a garage wall, but hopeless for tight public transport manoeuvres. In a lift, you'll fit; on a packed metro, you'll make enemies. Daily life is simple if you have ground-level storage or a garage and are happy to only carry the battery indoors.
The ZERO 10X, while also heavy, is more "normal scooter shaped". It's narrower and a bit lighter, so wrestling it into a hatchback is less dramatic. However, the folding system feels quite old-school: the stem doesn't lock to the deck, so carrying it more than a few metres is an awkward, two-handed wrestling match with a flopping front end. As a "fold sometimes into car, store under a table at work" scooter, it's acceptable. As a "daily up the stairs" scooter, it's a slow path to regret.
In day-to-day running, the MIA's practicality shows up in unexpected places: the stability makes low-speed manoeuvres less tiring, the wide deck makes standing for long periods comfortable, and the four-wheel stance is brilliant for stop-and-go city riding where you're creeping in traffic. The 10X is practical in the sense that it's faster and comfier than public transport, but it asks more of your body-both to ride and to haul.
Safety
If safety is your top line on the checklist, the comparison isn't subtle.
The MIA FOUR X2's whole concept is built around stability. Four large tyres, wide track, long wheelbase and a tilting chassis mean you have a ridiculous amount of grip and forgiveness. Hit loose gravel mid-corner? You'll probably just feel a squirm and carry on. Brake hard on a damp patch? The scooter hunkers down rather than threatening to pitch you forward. It genuinely reduces the number of "oh no" moments before they exist.
Lighting on the MIA is integrated and bright, and the wider shape simply makes you look like a proper vehicle in traffic rather than a skinny silhouette. Drivers see you more, which matters far more than most people admit. And the braking hardware and geometry make emergency stops feel controlled instead of dramatic.
The ZERO 10X does safety more in the traditional "big performance scooter" ways: decent traction from the fat tyres, strong brakes on the better-spec models, and a planted feel from the overall mass. But it has the usual single-stem caveats: any play in the clamp at high speed is unnerving, and historically many owners have had to fix that themselves with upgraded parts. The stock headlights are too low and too weak if you ride fast at night; you more or less budget in a bar-mounted light from day one.
In steady hands and with a few community-recommended tweaks, the 10X can be a reasonably safe performance scooter. The MIA, however, starts from a different baseline: physics is simply more on your side. For newer riders, older riders, or anyone who already has a "crash memory" lodged somewhere in the brain, that makes a huge difference in how relaxed-and how fast-you're willing to ride.
Community Feedback
| MIA FOUR X2 (4x2) | ZERO 10X |
|---|---|
What riders love
|
What riders love
|
What riders complain about
|
What riders complain about
|
Price & Value
This is the one area where the ZERO 10X lands a solid punch: pure up-front cost.
The ZERO 10X sits in a sweet spot where you get very serious performance, real suspension and a well-known platform for the kind of money many people are willing to spend on a "serious hobby", not a life decision. If you are after sheer speed and comfort per euro spent, the 10X remains one of the strongest value plays in the performance segment.
The MIA FOUR X2, in contrast, is firmly in the luxury bracket. Its price lives in the territory of flagship hyperscooters-except instead of spending the money on more voltage and party lighting, it spends it on geometry, kinematics and safety. Four tyres, complex suspension arms, a tilting mechanism and a removable, branded-cell battery pack are expensive to build. You are buying engineering, not just wattage and a bigger number on the box.
From a pure wallet perspective, the ZERO 10X is undeniably "better value" if all you care about is going fast, far, and comfortably for the least money. If you factor in the cost of crashes avoided, fatigue saved and long-term "I'm going to keep this thing for many years" quality, the MIA starts to look like fair value rather than overpriced-but your bank account still needs to agree.
Service & Parts Availability
The ZERO 10X is a known quantity almost everywhere. Parts exist from countless suppliers, generic and branded. Need a swing arm? A controller? A full stem assembly? There's probably a shop or online store that has it on a shelf, and ten YouTube videos on how to install it. Any decent scooter mechanic has seen this platform before. That ecosystem is a big part of its long-term appeal.
The MIA FOUR X2 is more specialised. You're dealing with proprietary suspension arms, a unique tilting system, and a battery form factor you can't just replace with a random brick from AliExpress. The upside is that MIA and their distributors appear to take support seriously, and the scooter is engineered with visible, accessible components. But you are more tied to the brand and its partners for big parts than with the 10X, where the whole world stocks compatible bits.
If you live somewhere with good MIA representation, you're fine. If you live somewhere remote and love the idea of long-term self-sufficiency with third-party parts, the ZERO 10X still has the upper hand.
Pros & Cons Summary
| MIA FOUR X2 (4x2) | ZERO 10X | |
|---|---|---|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | MIA FOUR X2 (4x2) | ZERO 10X |
|---|---|---|
| Motor power (nominal / peak) | Dual hubs, ~2.000 W / 3.600 W peak | Dual hubs, 2.000 W / ~3.200 W peak |
| Top speed (unrestricted) | ≈ 72 km/h | ≈ 65-70 km/h (depending on version) |
| Claimed range | ≈ 80 km | ≈ 40-85 km (battery-dependent) |
| Realistic mixed range | ≈ 50-60 km | ≈ 45-55 km (larger batteries) |
| Battery | 60 V 25 Ah (1.500 Wh) LG, swappable | 52 V 18/23 Ah or 60 V 21 Ah (≈ 936-1.260 Wh) |
| Weight | ≈ 41,3 kg | ≈ 35,0 kg |
| Brakes | Front & rear dual hydraulic discs | Front & rear discs (mechanical or hydraulic) |
| Suspension | Full double wishbone, front & rear | Front & rear spring-hydraulic |
| Tyres | 14,5" pneumatic, indoor/outdoor | 10" x 3" pneumatic |
| Max load | ≈ 136 kg | ≈ 120 kg (higher in practice) |
| IP / weather | Rugged design, check exact IP | No official IP, light-rain only advised |
| Approx. price | ≈ 5.551 € | ≈ 1.749 € (battery-dependent) |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
If money were no object and I had somewhere sensible to store it, I would pick the MIA FOUR X2 (4x2) without hesitation. It is simply the more evolved machine: vastly more stable, more relaxing, more confidence-inspiring, and more "future vehicle" than "oversized toy". It lets you ride fast on bad surfaces without that constant little knot of fear you get on big two-wheelers, and it keeps your body far fresher over longer distances.
The ZERO 10X still absolutely has a place. For riders who want proper dual-motor performance on a realistic budget, who like the idea of wrenching, modding and upgrading, and who mostly ride on decent tarmac, the 10X remains a fun, capable workhorse. It's the scooter you buy when you want big power but your finances-and maybe your partner-refuse to accept the MIA's price tag.
But judged purely as a riding experience and as a piece of engineering, the MIA FOUR X2 plays in another league. If your routes are rough, your risk tolerance isn't what it once was, or you simply value arriving calm as much as arriving quickly, the tilting four-wheeler is the one that will keep you riding longer-and smiling more often.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | MIA FOUR X2 (4x2) | ZERO 10X |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ❌ 3,70 €/Wh | ✅ 1,46 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ❌ 77,10 €/km/h | ✅ 26,91 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ✅ 27,52 g/Wh | ❌ 29,27 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | ❌ 0,57 kg/km/h | ✅ 0,54 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ❌ 100,93 €/km | ✅ 34,98 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ❌ 0,75 kg/km | ✅ 0,70 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ❌ 27,27 Wh/km | ✅ 23,92 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ✅ 50,00 W/km/h | ❌ 49,23 W/km/h |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | ❌ 0,0115 kg/W | ✅ 0,0109 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ✅ 272,73 W | ❌ 108,73 W |
These metrics give a cold, mathematical snapshot: how much you pay per unit of energy and speed, how heavy each scooter is relative to its battery and power, how efficiently they turn battery into distance, and how fast they refill. They don't tell you how either feels to ride, but they do highlight that the ZERO 10X is far cheaper and more energy-efficient per kilometre, while the MIA focuses on faster charging and more power density rather than budget-friendly numbers.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | MIA FOUR X2 (4x2) | ZERO 10X |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ❌ Heavier, harder to lift | ✅ Lighter, easier to move |
| Range | ✅ Strong range, swappable pack | ❌ Similar range, fixed pack |
| Max Speed | ✅ Slightly higher top end | ❌ Just a bit slower |
| Power | ✅ More peak grunt | ❌ Slightly less punch |
| Battery Size | ✅ Larger, branded cells | ❌ Smaller in most trims |
| Suspension | ✅ Double wishbone brilliance | ❌ Good but conventional |
| Design | ✅ Futuristic, purposeful quad look | ❌ Older, more generic frame |
| Safety | ✅ Four-wheel stability, braking | ❌ Two-wheel, stem caveats |
| Practicality | ✅ Swappable battery, car-friendly | ❌ Awkward carry, no swappable |
| Comfort | ✅ Next-level plush, very stable | ❌ Comfy, but more tiring |
| Features | ✅ Tilting quad, app options | ❌ More basic feature set |
| Serviceability | ❌ More complex mechanics | ✅ Simpler, widely understood |
| Customer Support | ✅ Strong, responsive reports | ✅ Solid dealer network |
| Fun Factor | ✅ Leaning quad, corner carving | ❌ Fun but more nervous |
| Build Quality | ✅ Overbuilt, rock-solid feel | ❌ Good, but more flex |
| Component Quality | ✅ High-end suspension, LG cells | ❌ Mixed, varies by trim |
| Brand Name | ❌ Newer, more niche | ✅ Established global name |
| Community | ❌ Smaller, more niche crowd | ✅ Huge, active mod community |
| Lights (visibility) | ✅ Wide stance, strong presence | ❌ Slimmer, weaker stock setup |
| Lights (illumination) | ✅ Better integrated headlights | ❌ Deck lights, add bar light |
| Acceleration | ✅ Brutal but controlled shove | ❌ Brutal, less planted |
| Arrive with smile factor | ✅ Massive grin, relaxed nerves | ✅ Huge grin, adrenaline buzz |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ✅ Very low fatigue | ❌ More tiring, more tension |
| Charging speed | ✅ Faster average charging | ❌ Slower on standard brick |
| Reliability | ✅ Overbuilt, robust hardware | ❌ More wear, more fiddling |
| Folded practicality | ❌ Flat but large footprint | ✅ Narrower, easier to stash |
| Ease of transport | ❌ Wide, very heavy | ✅ Lighter, narrower |
| Handling | ✅ Stable, confidence in corners | ❌ Agile but more twitchy |
| Braking performance | ✅ Four-wheel, strong hydraulics | ❌ Good, but less planted |
| Riding position | ✅ Wide, relaxed stance | ❌ Good, but more cramped |
| Handlebar quality | ✅ Stiff, wobble-free stem | ❌ Clamp and flex issues |
| Throttle response | ❌ Strong, can feel abrupt | ✅ Strong but more familiar |
| Dashboard/Display | ✅ Clear, suits premium feel | ❌ Generic, cluttered cockpit |
| Security (locking) | ✅ Serious vehicle, easier to secure | ❌ Stem not locking, lighter |
| Weather protection | ✅ Rugged build, better sealed | ❌ No real IP confidence |
| Resale value | ✅ Niche, premium appeal | ✅ Popular, easy to resell |
| Tuning potential | ❌ Proprietary geometry limits mods | ✅ Endless mods, upgrades |
| Ease of maintenance | ❌ More moving parts | ✅ Simple, lots of guides |
| Value for Money | ❌ Expensive, niche proposition | ✅ Huge performance for price |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the MIA FOUR X2 (4x2) scores 3 points against the ZERO 10X's 7. In the Author's Category Battle, the MIA FOUR X2 (4x2) gets 29 ✅ versus 13 ✅ for ZERO 10X (with a few ties sprinkled in).
Totals: MIA FOUR X2 (4x2) scores 32, ZERO 10X scores 20.
Based on the scoring, the MIA FOUR X2 (4x2) is our overall winner. As a rider, the MIA FOUR X2 (4x2) just feels like the more complete, future-proof machine: it pampers your body, calms your nerves and lets you go fast on ugly roads without constantly second-guessing every bump and patch of gravel. The ZERO 10X still scratches the itch for raw power on a sensible budget and remains a lovable, tuneable hooligan, but it never quite escapes the compromises of its older, two-wheeled architecture. If you want every ride to feel like a confident glide rather than a small adventure in risk management, the MIA is the one you will still be happy to stand on years from now. The 10X has its charms, but the FOUR X2 feels like where high-end scooters are inevitably heading.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.

