Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
The NAMI BURN-E 2 is the overall winner: it rides better, feels vastly more refined, and inspires far more confidence at the kind of speeds where mistakes really hurt. Its suspension, frame stiffness, braking feel and controller smoothness put it in a different league for serious daily use.
The TOURSOR X5 is for riders who want maximum power-per-euro and are willing to trade polish, brand support and refinement for raw, slightly wild performance at a bargain price. If your budget has a hard ceiling and you like to wrench and tinker, the X5 can make sense.
If you care about long-term ownership, comfort, safety and cohesion as much as headline specs, the NAMI is the scooter you live with; the TOURSOR is the scooter you "play with". Keep reading - the devil here is very much in the riding experience, not just the spec sheet.
There's a certain type of scooter that stops being "micromobility" and starts feeling like a compact motorcycle with a deck. Both the TOURSOR X5 and the NAMI BURN-E 2 live firmly in that world: hulking, dual-motor, full-suspension brutes that laugh at hills and cruise at speeds most city laws only dream of allowing.
I've spent enough kilometres on both to know they're chasing the same fantasy in very different ways. The X5 is that loud, slightly sketchy club bouncer who can absolutely run, jump and fight but probably skipped leg day stretches. The BURN-E 2 is the ex-special-forces type: brutal capability wrapped in methodical, disciplined engineering.
On paper, they both promise insane speed, big batteries and proper suspension. On the road, only one of them feels like something I'd trust every day at full tilt. Let's break down where your money really goes.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
Both scooters sit in the "hyper-scooter" territory: dual motors, serious batteries, full hydraulic brakes, and the kind of weight that makes stairs an immediate "nope". They're built for riders who have long outgrown city toys and want a machine that can genuinely replace a car or small motorbike for many trips.
The TOURSOR X5 plays the "specs for peanuts" card. For well under what a midrange commuter from a big brand costs, you get insane peak power, a massive battery, off-road tyres and hydraulic suspension. It's the typical budget hot-rod: less about brand heritage, more about "how much wattage can we stuff in before something breaks?"
The NAMI BURN-E 2 sits in the premium tier. You pay several times the price of the X5, but you're buying into a purpose-designed frame, sine-wave controllers, custom suspension, serious IP protection and a brand that has become a reference point in the high-end scene.
They're competitors in the sense that many riders will stare at the X5's price, then the NAMI's, and wonder: "Is the NAMI really worth that much more?" That's exactly what we're going to answer.
Design & Build Quality
Pick up the TOURSOR X5 (or rather, attempt to), and you immediately feel the "more is more" philosophy. The frame is a chunky aluminium assembly, with a conventional folding stem and a general vibe of "big, heavy, overbuilt scooter with some edges left rough around the seams". It doesn't feel fragile, but it does feel very "factory line" - lots of metal, lots of welds, not much finesse. Wiring is reasonably tucked away with a stated waterproof layout, but you can tell it's built to a price.
The NAMI BURN-E 2, by contrast, feels like it was designed first and costed later. The one-piece tubular frame around the deck looks like a structural exoskeleton rather than bolted-together plates. The carbon fibre steering column is stiff without flex, and the hinge is at the neck, not half-way up the stem - a big deal at speed. It's the difference between "this should hold" and "this is absolutely not going anywhere".
Touchpoints tell the same story. The X5's deck grip, grips and cockpit are fine, even decent for the money, but they have that generic parts-bin flavour. The display works, but in harsh sun it's more guesswork than precision instrument. On the BURN-E 2, the big waterproof central display looks and feels like something designed for this scooter specifically. Buttons, levers and hardware have that reassuring tightness you get when tolerances aren't an afterthought.
In the hand and under the feet, the TOURSOR feels like a capable machine held together by weight and sheer chunkiness. The NAMI feels like a thoroughly engineered vehicle whose strength comes from structure, not just mass. That difference really shows up once you start pushing them.
Ride Comfort & Handling
Let's be nice to the TOURSOR first: for its segment, the X5 actually rides better than you might expect. The dual hydraulic suspension and fat off-road tyres smooth out nasty city surfaces pretty convincingly. You can roll over cracked asphalt and mild gravel without your knees writing a resignation letter. It's far, far ahead of cheap spring-fork scooters or rubber-block "suspension" some brands dare to sell.
But then you get on the NAMI BURN-E 2, and it's frankly a different sport. The long-travel, fully adjustable KKE shocks let you actually tune the chassis to your weight and riding style. Out of the box it has that "magic carpet" quality: you see potholes, feel them visually, but the impact barely reaches your legs. Cobblestones? They go from "please slow down" on the X5 to "background texture" on the NAMI.
Handling paints an even sharper contrast. The X5 is fun and nimble enough at moderate speed, but when you start leaning harder or braking aggressively, you can feel a bit of flex in the front assembly and a general rawness. It's rideable, but it asks you to stay alert, especially off-road or near its top speed.
The BURN-E 2, with its rock-solid stem and long wheelbase, feels planted. Wide bars give you leverage, and the scooter tracks through fast sweepers with the kind of calm you usually expect from a big motorcycle. Flicking between lanes at city pace feels precise, never twitchy. Yes, I'd still want a steering damper for repeated runs above legal speeds, but even stock, the underlying chassis inspires far more trust than the TOURSOR's.
After an hour of mixed riding, the difference is brutal: on the X5, I'm pleasantly surprised I'm not more tired. On the NAMI, I'm checking the clock wondering how far I can still go today without my body complaining.
Performance
Both of these scooters are comically fast by sane standards. Neither is appropriate for your first scooter unless you also thought a superbike was a good first motorcycle. With that out of the way:
The TOURSOR X5 is sheer, slightly unhinged violence. Dual high-power motors on a 60-volt system mean that when you punch both motors into their highest mode, the scooter does its best impersonation of a cat launched off a sofa with a vacuum cleaner behind it. The initial hit is brutal and can feel a bit "all or nothing" if you're not feathering the thumb properly. On an empty stretch, it will barrel up to speeds that, put politely, are not designed for cycle paths.
On hills, the X5 has enough torque that you stop thinking about gradients. Point it uphill, squeeze, and it goes. Even with a heavy rider, it doesn't feel particularly stressed until the battery is quite depleted. For the price, the performance is ridiculous.
The NAMI BURN-E 2, however, shows what happens when similar headline numbers are delivered with proper electronics. The sine-wave controllers transform the throttle from light switch to scalpel. You can creep through a crowd at walking pace without any jerks, then roll on and feel a seamless, linear shove that just keeps building. It still corners your eyeballs when you go full send, but it does so with a sense of control rather than chaos.
Top-speed sensation is also different. On the X5, once you're well above urban limits, you're aware of all the little vibrations and movements in the chassis. It can do it, but you're mentally keeping a margin. On the NAMI at similar speeds, the scooter feels calmer; motor noise is lower, and the stability and suspension mean you're fighting the wind more than the scooter. It genuinely feels like it wants to cruise at speeds where the X5 feels like it's putting on its best clothes and hoping nothing tears.
Braking follows the same pattern: the X5's hydraulic brakes are powerful and perfectly adequate, but they're doing all the work. On the NAMI, strong hydraulic calipers are backed by configurable regen that takes a huge bite out of speed as soon as you come off the throttle. You end up using regen for most deceleration and only squeezing the levers when you need real bite. The result is smoother, more predictable stopping, especially on long descents where you don't want to cook discs.
Battery & Range
Battery capacity is one of the TOURSOR X5's strongest cards. Its pack is huge for the price bracket, and if you ride with some restraint - single-motor mode, moderate cruising speeds - you can cover serious distance before the gauge starts nagging. Push it hard in dual-motor mode and the range drops, of course, but it's still a scooter you can realistically use for a week of commuting without charging if your daily distance is modest.
The downside is energy efficiency and pack quality finesse. Big motors, square-wave style control and off-road tyres mean you're burning watt-hours with gusto. In real-world spirited riding, the range is good, but not quite as miraculous as the spec sheet suggests. You feel the drop when you abuse the power.
The NAMI BURN-E 2 carries slightly less energy on paper, but uses it more efficiently. The higher voltage system and well-tuned controllers mean you get better performance for each unit of energy spent. In practice, with both ridden "sensibly fast", the ranges end up surprisingly close, and in some mixed-riding scenarios the NAMI actually stretches its legs further than you'd expect from the numbers alone.
Charging is another trade-off. The X5's big battery means long charge times unless you use dual chargers; overnight top-ups become the norm. The BURN-E 2 also wants a good night's sleep to refuel fully, but with dual ports and fast-charger options, it's a bit easier to work around if you're clocking truly high weekly mileage.
Most importantly: on the NAMI, I worry less about the battery's long-term health. Everything from cell choice to BMS tuning and brand track record makes me more comfortable betting on it retaining decent capacity after a few years of abuse. The X5's pack is generous and uses decent cells on paper, but it lives in a harsher, less refined electrical environment.
Portability & Practicality
Let's be honest: both of these weigh around what a small person does. Neither is "portable" in the normal scooter sense. But there are nuances.
The TOURSOR X5 has a conventional folding stem and a reasonably compact folded footprint for such a brute. You can, with some muscle and careful manoeuvring, get it into a car boot or stash it in a corner of a garage. Carrying it up a flight of stairs is a one-time party trick, not a daily habit.
The NAMI BURN-E 2 is similar in weight but bulkier in feel. The huge frame and wide handlebars make it more awkward to wrestle through narrow doors or into small cars. The folding mechanism prioritises rigidity over compactness, so even folded it still feels like a big piece of hardware that wants its own parking space.
On the flip side, day-to-day practicality tilts towards the NAMI. The IP55 weather protection means you're not panicking at the first sign of rain; connectors and enclosures are clearly designed with real climates in mind. The horn, lighting, regen braking and overall stability make it a more credible traffic participant when you're sharing roads with cars at brisk speeds.
The X5's practicality is more "if you have a garage and dry storage, it'll serve as a fun, fast point-to-point machine". Off-road tyres and sheer torque do let you cut across rough paths and trails, which is a huge plus if your city has legal mixed-use shortcuts. But as soon as public transport, stairs or cramped lifts enter the picture, both machines become problematic - the NAMI slightly more so due to its form factor.
Safety
When you're standing on a plank doing scooter-level highway speeds, safety is mostly about three things: structure, stability and stopping.
Structurally, the TOURSOR X5 has a beefy frame and a double-locking stem arrangement, which is better than the flimsy single clamps some budget brands still dare to sell. However, community reports of steering assembly bolts needing attention and the general feel of a more conventional folding design mean it demands routine bolt checks and a bit of mechanical sympathy, especially if you're pushing it hard off-road.
The NAMI's monocoque-style frame and carbon stem are in a different category altogether. Grab the bars and yank, and nothing moves except the suspension. That absence of flex at the hinge and stem is not just confidence-inspiring, it's what you want when you're braking hard from speeds where a wobble can put you in hospital. Add a steering damper (which, realistically, you should budget for), and it becomes notably calmer still.
Brakes: both have hydraulic discs, but the NAMI pairs them with strong, adjustable regen that acts like a motorbike's engine braking turned up to eleven. Once you tune it, you can almost ride "one-pedal" style, which not only shortens real stopping distances but keeps the chassis more settled. The X5 relies purely on its hydraulics and tyre grip; they work well enough, but again, without that same sophisticated integration.
In terms of visibility, the TOURSOR throws a lot of LEDs at the problem - bright headlight, deck lights, indicators, brake light. You are definitely visible; the scooter verges on festive at night. The light pattern is good enough to see where you're going at speed, but it's still the typical low-mounted setup that can get lost behind parked cars or road furniture.
The NAMI's high-mounted, brutal headlight actually lights the road like a proper vehicle, and the side LED strips with integrated indicators make you look like the serious machine you are. In traffic, that difference matters, especially when drivers are deciding whether you're a toy to ignore or something they should give space to.
Tires and grip are a mixed bag. The TOURSOR's off-road pattern gives tons of bite on loose surfaces but can be vague and squirmy on wet tarmac. The NAMI's stock rubber is fine but not perfect in the rain either, and many owners upgrade. Still, once you're on quality road tyres, the NAMI's chassis lets you exploit that grip more confidently than the X5's slightly looser front end.
Community Feedback
| TOURSOR X5 | NAMI BURN-E 2 |
|---|---|
What riders love
|
What riders love
|
What riders complain about
|
What riders complain about
|
Price & Value
This is where the TOURSOR X5 shouts loudest. For not much more than what some brands want for a mid-tier commuter, you get dual motors, a huge pack, hydraulic suspension and proper brakes. On a pure "how many watts and watt-hours per euro?" basis, the X5 absolutely crushes it.
But value is more than spec-sheet socialism. Over a couple of seasons and a few thousand kilometres, refinements, reliability, dealer and parts support, and how much confidence the scooter gives you at speed all start to matter a lot. This is where the NAMI quietly earns its asking price back.
The BURN-E 2 costs several times as much upfront, no question. Yet it delivers a riding experience that genuinely rivals or outclasses many more expensive hyper-scooters from the old guard. If you're replacing a car commute, factoring in saved fuel, parking and time, the cost begins to look more like a long-term tool investment than a toy splurge.
If your budget is tight and you simply want maximum fireworks per euro, the X5 is hard to argue with. If you can afford the NAMI, it's the machine far more likely to still feel "right" years down the line instead of reminding you where corners were cut.
Service & Parts Availability
TOURSOR operates heavily in the direct-to-consumer, marketplace-seller space. That helps keep prices down, but it also means your support experience depends a lot on who you happened to click "buy" from. Some sellers stock spares and handle warranty decently; others... less so. Community reports of steering hardware and maintenance needs make that variability more relevant than you'd like.
NAMI, despite being a younger brand, has built a fairly robust network of specialised dealers and distributors, especially in Europe and North America. Parts like controllers, displays, swingarms and even upgraded components are relatively easy to source through known channels, and the brand has a reputation for iterating and quietly fixing issues on later batches rather than shrugging.
From a workshop perspective, both scooters are serviceable by a competent PEV mechanic. But with the NAMI you're working on a platform that many shops already know well and can get parts for without weeks of cross-border parcel roulette. With the TOURSOR, you're a little more on your own - fine if you like tinkering and sourcing parts, less so if you just want someone to "make it work" locally.
Pros & Cons Summary
| TOURSOR X5 | NAMI BURN-E 2 |
|---|---|
Pros
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
Cons
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | TOURSOR X5 | NAMI BURN-E 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Motor power (rated / peak) | Dual 3.000 W (ca. 6.000 W peak) | Dual 1.000 W (ca. 5.000 W peak) |
| Top speed | ca. 85 km/h | ca. 85 km/h |
| Battery energy | ca. 2.280 Wh (60 V 38 Ah) | ca. 2.160 Wh (72 V 28 Ah) |
| Claimed range | up to 120 km | up to 120 km |
| Real-world range (est.) | ca. 70-90 km | ca. 60-80 km |
| Weight | ca. 45 kg | ca. 45 kg |
| Brakes | XOD hydraulic discs (F/R) | Logan hydraulic discs + regen |
| Suspension | Hydraulic, front double-tube + rear damper | Adjustable hydraulic coil shocks (F/R) |
| Tyres | 11" tubeless off-road pneumatic | 11" tubeless pneumatic (road-biased) |
| Max load | ca. 136-150 kg (reported) | ca. 120 kg |
| Water resistance | IP5 (approx. IPX5) | IP55 |
| Charging time (typical) | ca. 8-10 h | ca. 6-12 h (charger-dependent) |
| Approx. price | ca. 973 € | ca. 3.435 € |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
Both of these scooters are fast, heavy and overkill for casual city errands. But they target different kinds of riders.
The TOURSOR X5 is for the budget adrenaline chaser. If you want incredible straight-line shove, a big battery and real off-road capability for as little money as possible - and you're happy to accept a rougher finish, more self-maintenance and some question marks around long-term support - the X5 delivers a silly amount of scooter for the price. Treat it like a hot-rod: fast, fun, but a bit raw and happiest with an owner who's handy with tools and safety checks.
The NAMI BURN-E 2 is for the rider who wants hyper-scooter performance without feeling like they're rolling the dice every time they open the throttle. Its chassis, suspension, controls and lighting make it a machine you can genuinely live with: commuting fast in bad weather, carving rough roads, or doing long weekend runs without getting beaten up. Yes, it costs a lot more. But it also feels like a properly finished vehicle rather than a collection of powerful parts.
If you forced me to keep just one as my main transport, it would be the NAMI without hesitation. The TOURSOR X5 will make you laugh on the right road for the right price; the NAMI BURN-E 2 will keep you smiling, and relaxed, ride after ride.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | TOURSOR X5 | NAMI BURN-E 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ✅ 0,43 €/Wh | ❌ 1,59 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ✅ 11,44 €/km/h | ❌ 40,41 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ✅ 19,74 g/Wh | ❌ 20,83 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | ✅ 0,53 kg/km/h | ✅ 0,53 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ✅ 12,16 €/km | ❌ 49,07 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ✅ 0,56 kg/km | ❌ 0,64 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ✅ 28,50 Wh/km | ❌ 30,86 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ✅ 70,59 W/(km/h) | ❌ 58,82 W/(km/h) |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | ✅ 0,0075 kg/W | ❌ 0,0090 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ✅ 253,33 W | ❌ 240,00 W |
These metrics are pure maths: they show how much you pay per unit of energy, speed and range, how effectively each scooter turns battery capacity and weight into performance, and how fast their packs refill. Lower is better for cost, weight and efficiency metrics, while higher is better for raw power density and charging speed. Unsurprisingly, the TOURSOR X5 crushes the value-per-spec side; the NAMI's advantages lie elsewhere - in how those watts actually feel and how the machine behaves.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | TOURSOR X5 | NAMI BURN-E 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ✅ Similar, slightly denser pack | ✅ Same mass, more structure |
| Range | ✅ Slightly longer in practice | ❌ A bit less real range |
| Max Speed | ✅ Matches NAMI on paper | ✅ Same real top speed |
| Power | ✅ Stronger peak shove | ❌ Slightly lower peak output |
| Battery Size | ✅ Larger capacity pack | ❌ Slightly smaller battery |
| Suspension | ❌ Good but basic tuning | ✅ Best-in-class adjustables |
| Design | ❌ Industrial, a bit generic | ✅ Iconic tubular, cyberpunk |
| Safety | ❌ Raw, more checks needed | ✅ Rigid frame, better systems |
| Practicality | ❌ Heavy, weaker weather proofing | ✅ IP55, traffic-ready gear |
| Comfort | ❌ Comfortable, but less plush | ✅ Magic carpet ride feel |
| Features | ❌ Basics only, few extras | ✅ Smart display, deep tuning |
| Serviceability | ❌ Parts, docs less consistent | ✅ Known platform, dealer support |
| Customer Support | ❌ Depends heavily on seller | ✅ Brand engages, responds |
| Fun Factor | ✅ Brutal, silly acceleration | ✅ Addictive, refined power hit |
| Build Quality | ❌ Feels a bit parts-bin | ✅ Cohesive, high-end build |
| Component Quality | ❌ Decent, price-driven choices | ✅ Premium controllers, shocks |
| Brand Name | ❌ Lesser-known, budget image | ✅ Respected premium enthusiast |
| Community | ❌ Smaller, scattered groups | ✅ Large, active NAMI crowd |
| Lights (visibility) | ✅ Very flashy, visible | ✅ Excellent, integrated system |
| Lights (illumination) | ❌ Low-mounted, adequate beam | ✅ High, powerful headlight |
| Acceleration | ✅ More violent, drag-race feel | ❌ Slightly softer initial hit |
| Arrive with smile factor | ✅ Adrenaline, hooligan vibes | ✅ Grin plus quiet satisfaction |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ❌ Raw, mildly tiring | ✅ Calm, low fatigue |
| Charging speed | ✅ Slightly faster per Wh | ❌ Marginally slower average |
| Reliability | ❌ More niggles, bolt checks | ✅ Proven, iterated platform |
| Folded practicality | ✅ A bit more compact | ❌ Bulkier folded footprint |
| Ease of transport | ❌ Awkward, marketplace afterthought | ❌ Also awkward, very heavy |
| Handling | ❌ Fine, but less precise | ✅ Stable, confidence-inspiring |
| Braking performance | ❌ Strong, but no regen help | ✅ Hydraulics plus powerful regen |
| Riding position | ❌ Good, but less ergonomic | ✅ Natural, roomy stance |
| Handlebar quality | ❌ Functional, generic hardware | ✅ Wide, solid cockpit |
| Throttle response | ❌ Harsher, more on/off | ✅ Sine-wave smooth control |
| Dashboard / Display | ❌ Basic, glare issues | ✅ Rich data, tuning options |
| Security (locking) | ❌ No special provisions | ❌ Needs external solutions |
| Weather protection | ❌ Decent, but minimal rating | ✅ Better sealing, IP55 |
| Resale value | ❌ Budget brand depreciation | ✅ Holds value strongly |
| Tuning potential | ❌ Limited electronics tuning | ✅ Deep in-display adjustments |
| Ease of maintenance | ❌ Parts and guides patchy | ✅ Known quirks, better support |
| Value for Money | ✅ Insane specs per euro | ❌ Expensive, though justified |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the TOURSOR X5 scores 10 points against the NAMI BURN-E 2's 1. In the Author's Category Battle, the TOURSOR X5 gets 12 ✅ versus 30 ✅ for NAMI BURN-E 2 (with a few ties sprinkled in).
Totals: TOURSOR X5 scores 22, NAMI BURN-E 2 scores 31.
Based on the scoring, the NAMI BURN-E 2 is our overall winner. Riding both back-to-back, the NAMI BURN-E 2 simply feels like the more complete, grown-up machine: it's calmer when you're pushing, kinder to your body, and far more reassuring when life throws you a mid-corner pothole at silly speeds. The TOURSOR X5 is a riot in a straight line and astonishing for the money, but it always feels like a bargain rocket rather than a truly rounded vehicle. If your heart says "maximum chaos, minimum cost", the X5 will absolutely scratch that itch. If you want something you can depend on, trust, and enjoy long after the novelty of brutal acceleration has worn off, the BURN-E 2 is the one that genuinely earns a place in your daily life.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.

