Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
The NAMI Stellar is the overall winner here: it rides like a shrunken-down flagship, with buttery-smooth control and genuinely luxurious suspension in a package that still makes sense for everyday city use - and it does it for noticeably less money. The APOLLO City Pro fights back hard with more power, longer range and far better water protection, making it the sensible pick for heavy riders, very hilly cities or all-weather, car-replacement duty. If you're a comfort-obsessed commuter who wants refinement, stability and premium feel without overpaying for headline numbers, go Stellar. If your route includes nasty hills, regular rain and you like techy features and app tuning, the City Pro might still be the better match. Keep reading - the differences are subtle in the brochure, but very obvious once you ride them back to back.
Now let's dig into how they actually feel on real streets, not on spec sheets.
On paper, the NAMI Stellar and APOLLO City Pro look like they live in different neighbourhoods. One is a single-motor "compact performance" scooter from a hardcore enthusiast brand; the other is a slick, dual-motor tech machine that wants to be your car's replacement. In reality, if you're shopping in the premium commuter bracket and you care about comfort and quality more than chasing outrageous top speeds, these two end up on the same shortlist very quickly.
The Stellar is the "mini hyper-scooter" for riders who love feeling connected to a serious chassis and suspension, but still need to live with their scooter day to day. The City Pro is the well-dressed, fully integrated "appliance" that just wants to get you across town fast, dry and fuss-free, whatever the weather.
Both are good. Only one feels like a little bit of magic under your feet. Let's break it down.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
Price-wise, the Stellar sits in the entry-premium sweet spot, while the City Pro climbs solidly into the premium bracket. In human terms: the Stellar is what many riders stretch their budget to; the City Pro is what you buy when you've decided your scooter really is your main vehicle.
Both target serious commuters, not casual Sunday park riders. We're talking people doing substantial daily distances, often on rough surfaces, often at speeds where cheap scooters start wobbling and squeaking in protest. Both promise "real vehicle" feel, plush suspension, strong braking and "I don't need a car for this" performance.
Why compare them? Because if you want a comfortable, high-quality commuter that isn't a 40 kg monster, there aren't that many serious options. The NAMI appeals to riders who care about chassis and ride feel first, numbers second. The Apollo appeals to riders who want integration, waterproofing and dual-motor security. Many will be torn between exactly these two.
Design & Build Quality
Pick up the Stellar and it immediately feels like a shrunk-down piece of serious moto hardware. The tubular, fully welded aluminium frame is pure NAMI: open, industrial, almost overbuilt for the power on tap. There's very little plastic, and what's there feels more like trim than structure. The stem clamp is hefty, the hinges look like they belong on something twice the weight, and the whole thing gives off "will outlive your knees" energy.
The City Pro comes from a completely different design school. Think "consumer electronics" more than "garage-built race scooter". The frame is dense and solid, but everything is hidden: cables are tucked away inside, panels are sculpted, and the deck is topped with a thick rubber mat that wipes clean in seconds. It looks smart enough to park next to a Tesla without embarrassment. There's no question: visually, the Apollo is the more polished, conventionally attractive product.
In the hands, though, the Stellar feels slightly more honest. You see the welds, the suspension arms, the spring hardware. You also hear, occasionally, a bolt that needs a quarter-turn of a wrench if you neglect it - this is still very much an enthusiast chassis. The Apollo, in contrast, feels more sealed and silent, but the downside of that elegance is that when something does need attention, it's generally less obvious and often less trivial to access.
Design philosophy in one sentence: the Stellar is a compact performance frame that happens to commute; the City Pro is a commuter product that happens to be powerful.
Ride Comfort & Handling
This is where the NAMI quietly walks in, hangs its jacket and takes over the room.
The Stellar's dual adjustable suspension is the kind of thing you usually only see on scooters that weigh as much as a small motorcycle. Up front and at the rear you get proper coil-over units with real travel and real damping. Dialled in correctly for your weight, the scooter glides over cobbles, expansion joints and poorly poured concrete like they're merely suggestions rather than obstacles. After a good twenty minutes on broken city asphalt, your ankles, knees and wrists still feel like you've just stepped out of a lift, not off a scooter.
The 9-inch tyres could have been a weak point, but the suspension works so hard you mostly forget about their smaller diameter. You do need to stay slightly more awake for deep potholes - you can't just steamroll everything the way you would on big 11-inch wheels - but the chassis stays composed. The deck is long enough for a proper staggered stance with a kickplate to brace against, and the wide bars give you great leverage without feeling silly in tight city gaps.
The City Pro's ride is tuned very differently. The triple-spring setup - one in the stem, two at the back - works with larger 10-inch tubeless tyres to give a firm, controlled, almost sporty feel. On fresh tarmac or typical city roads, it's genuinely excellent: you float over the general chatter of the surface, and sharp hits are rounded off nicely. Where it comes up a notch below the NAMI is on really rough stuff: broken cobbles, patchwork repairs, long stretches of cracked concrete. You feel more of the texture through your legs and hands. Not uncomfortable, but definitely more "car with firm suspension" than "magic carpet".
Handling-wise, the City Pro's wide, non-folding bar and long wheelbase give tremendous straight-line stability, especially at higher speed. On twisty bike lanes and around parked cars, the Stellar feels more playful and eager to change direction; the Apollo is happier bombing straight down a boulevard at pace. Both are stable, but the NAMI's suspension lets you lean into awful surfaces with more confidence that the chassis will soak up your mistakes.
Performance
If you care about raw push, the City Pro has the numbers advantage and it feels like it. Dual motors give you that effortless, no-drama surge away from lights, even if you're a heavier rider or carrying a big backpack. On steep ramps and long bridges, it just keeps pulling, maintaining bike-lane-crushing speeds where many single-motor scooters would already be wheezing.
The throttle delivery is well behaved: you don't get that "catapult" effect some dual-motor scooters suffer from. Instead, it pours on power smoothly, like someone steadily turning up a dimmer switch. It will cheerfully climb the kind of hills that make casual e-scooters stop and think about their life choices. If you live somewhere seriously hilly, the Apollo's performance advantage is tangible every single ride.
The Stellar can't match that brute force up steep grades - it's a single rear motor, after all - but it punches well above what its spec sheet might suggest. Off the line, it feels lively rather than wild: plenty of torque, delivered in that classic NAMI sine-wave way, where you always feel in control and never yanked. It will comfortably sit at fast-commute speeds and still have some headroom, and in flat or moderately hilly cities you rarely feel it lacking. Only on sustained steep climbs does it start to run out of headroom compared to the City Pro.
Braking is almost a role reversal. The APOLLO's combo of strong regenerative braking on a dedicated left lever plus sealed drum brakes is frankly brilliant for commuting. You end up doing most of your slowing with regen alone, feathering speed with impressive precision and hardly touching the mechanical brakes. It feels car-like in the best way, and the fact that the drums are almost maintenance-free is a cherry on top.
The Stellar relies on cable-actuated discs, backed up by very nicely tuned regen. The mechanical brakes need more occasional adjustment, and they don't have the effortless, sealed feel of drums, but taken as a system the scooter still stops very confidently. Lever feel is progressive, and the chassis stays square under hard braking thanks to that stable frame and suspension. You work a bit more for the same braking result the Apollo gives with one regen lever, but you never feel under-braked for the Stellar's performance envelope.
Battery & Range
Range is where the City Pro flexes its bigger battery. In everyday riding - a mix of normal and sporty modes, some hills, some stops - it comfortably goes significantly further per charge than the Stellar. You're looking at the kind of distance where a typical urban commuter can skip charging every day and treat the scooter more like an electric car: plug it in every couple of days, not every night. For long, sprawling cities or for people who routinely chain errands onto their commute, this matters.
The Stellar sits firmly in "serious commuter" rather than "mini tourer" territory. Its pack size is well judged for daily city use: if your return journey is under a couple of dozen kilometres with some margin, you're golden. Push it flat-out everywhere or weigh on the heavier side, and you'll see the battery gauge dip faster, but not alarmingly so. For most people, you arrive home with comfortable reserves rather than limping back on fumes - as long as you're honest about your route length.
Charging is another subtle separator. The Apollo's big battery fills surprisingly quickly relative to its capacity, meaning a full workday outlet stop can take it from nearly empty to ready for another long round. The Stellar, with its smaller pack and slower charge, is more of a "overnight or office-day" charger. Both are perfectly usable; the Apollo just feels more grown-up in how quickly it's ready for another big day out.
Portability & Practicality
Neither of these is a "throw it under your arm and onto the metro" scooter, but the Stellar makes more of an effort to pretend.
The NAMI weighs in a few kilos lighter than the City Pro, and you do feel that every time you lift it. Carrying it up a short flight of stairs or into a car boot is doable without a pre-ride stretch. Do you want to regularly haul it to a fifth floor walk-up? Not unless you also want new shoulders. But as a "park at street level, occasionally lug" machine, it's within reason.
The fold on the Stellar is straightforward: solid clamp, stem comes down, hooks to the deck, grab and go. It's not the most compact thing on Earth, but it slides into most car boots and under many desks if you're willing to share legroom.
The City Pro is more of a roll-on, roll-off vehicle. It's heavier, and those extra kilos, combined with slightly bulkier dimensions and a non-folding handlebar, make it more awkward in tight stairwells or small lifts. You can lift it - you just won't enjoy it. Where it redeems itself is in daily practicality: that IP66 rating means you simply stop worrying about rain, and the self-healing tyres mean far fewer roadside "why did I choose this life?" moments with punctures.
Stairs and carrying? Advantage Stellar. All-weather, puncture-resistant everyday grind? That's more Apollo's domain.
Safety
Both scooters take safety seriously, but they go about it differently.
The Stellar's strength is visibility and stability. Its high-mounted, properly bright headlight finally answers the question, "why do so many scooters have lights that are purely decorative?" You can ride at night at real speeds and genuinely see the road ahead, not just your front fender. The electric horn is loud enough that drivers actually react, which is a nice change from the usual "polite bicycle bell in a diesel world". The frame and geometry give you a very planted, confidence-inspiring stance; even at the top of its speed range, the Stellar doesn't feel like it's about to twitch you into a tank-slapper.
The Apollo counters with a full 360° visibility package. The front light is decent (not on the NAMI's searchlight level, but workable), but the real ace is the integrated turn signals and bright rear light that shouts your intentions to following traffic. Being able to indicate without taking a hand off the bar in busy traffic is a genuine safety upgrade. Add in the IP66 water resistance and you get a scooter that's happy being used in foul weather, when accident risk is highest and most scooters are hiding indoors.
Tire choice matters too. The City Pro's larger, self-healing tubeless tyres grip well and shrug off the kind of debris that would end a ride instantly on lesser machines. The Stellar's slightly smaller tubeless tyres also grip nicely, but you remain more conscious of potholes and tram tracks: you're fine, but you pay more attention.
Braking, as mentioned earlier, tilts in Apollo's favour thanks purely to that outstanding regen implementation and sealed hardware. The NAMI's setup is still safe and strong, but a bit more conventional and maintenance-hungry. Overall, both scooters feel like "real vehicles" in terms of safety rather than toys; the Apollo just throws more tech at the problem, while the NAMI leans on chassis and lighting strength.
Community Feedback
| NAMI Stellar | APOLLO City Pro |
|---|---|
What riders love
|
What riders love
|
What riders complain about
|
What riders complain about
|
Price & Value
The Stellar undercuts the City Pro by a noticeable margin, and that colours the whole comparison. With the NAMI, a significant slice of what you pay goes into ride quality and chassis - the bits you actually feel, every metre. You don't get the biggest battery in the world or a laundry list of fancy app tricks, but you get a scooter that rides like a much more expensive machine, and it shows in how owners talk about it even after thousands of kilometres.
The City Pro costs more, but backs that price up with more outright performance, longer real-world range, excellent waterproofing and a lot of integration: app, advanced regen, turn signals, self-healing tyres, very low daily maintenance. If you're genuinely replacing a car or a public transport pass, those things have real value. It feels less like an enthusiast's toy and more like a finished appliance you just... use.
Value-wise, if your rides are within the Stellar's comfortable range window and you're not routinely tackling brutal hills or biblical weather, you're arguably getting more bang per euro from the NAMI. If you absolutely need the Apollo's extra power, range and weather armour, the extra spend starts to make sense, but you're paying a premium for that completeness.
Service & Parts Availability
NAMI leans heavily on a network of enthusiast-focused dealers, especially across Europe. That's good news if you like talking to shops that actually ride what they sell. Parts for things like suspension, controllers and displays are reasonably available, and the exposed, modular design makes basic work - checking bolts, adjusting brakes, swapping tyres - relatively straightforward. It's the kind of scooter you can maintain at home with a small toolkit and a bit of mechanical sympathy.
APOLLO, on the other hand, has positioned itself as a strongly service-backed brand, with regional service centres and a very present support team. Firmware updates, troubleshooting and warranty issues are generally handled through their ecosystem. The integrated design means some jobs are less DIY-friendly, but you're more likely to lean on official channels anyway. If you prefer to ride rather than wrench, the Apollo path may feel more reassuring.
In Europe specifically, availability is decent for both, but you'll want to check which brand has the stronger dealer or support presence in your country. In practice, the NAMI is friendlier to tinkerers; the Apollo is friendlier to people who never want to see inside a scooter deck.
Pros & Cons Summary
| NAMI Stellar | APOLLO City Pro |
|---|---|
Pros
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
Cons
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | NAMI Stellar | APOLLO City Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Motor configuration | Single rear motor | Dual motors |
| Nominal motor power | 1.000 W | 2 x 500 W |
| Top speed | ca. 45-50 km/h | 51,5 km/h |
| Battery capacity | 52 V 15,6 Ah (ca. 811 Wh) | 48 V 20 Ah (960 Wh) |
| Claimed range | up to 50 km | up to 69,2 km |
| Realistic range (mixed riding) | ca. 30-35 km | ca. 40-50 km |
| Weight | 25,5-27 kg (assume 26,0 kg) | 29,5 kg |
| Brakes | Mechanical disc + regen | Dual drum + strong regen |
| Suspension | Adjustable dual coil (front & rear) | Front spring + dual rear springs |
| Tyres | 9" tubeless pneumatic | 10" tubeless self-healing pneumatic |
| Max rider load | 110-120 kg | 120 kg |
| IP rating | IP55 | IP66 |
| Charging time (standard charger) | ca. 5-6 h (assume 5,5 h) | ca. 4,5 h |
| Price (street) | ca. 1.109 € | ca. 1.649 € |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
If you strip everything back to riding feel, the NAMI Stellar is the scooter that leaves a stronger impression. The chassis and suspension are simply on another level for this size and price. It's the kind of scooter where you arrive at your destination and think, "I'll take the long way home." For riders in mostly flat or moderately hilly cities, doing realistic commuter distances, it hits a near-perfect balance: serious comfort, more than enough performance, respectable range and a genuinely premium experience without the premium-pain price tag.
The APOLLO City Pro, on the other hand, is the more sensible grown-up in the room. If your commute involves brutal hills, heavy rain, or you really are replacing a car, its extra power, bigger battery, IP66 weather hardening and tech features make a compelling argument. It's not quite as cosseting over truly nasty surfaces, and it's heavier and pricier, but it behaves like a small, efficient vehicle that just gets on with the job day after day.
So: if your heart wants a scooter that rides like a downsized hyper-scooter and your wallet doesn't want to fund an actual hyper-scooter, the Stellar is the standout choice. If your brain is screaming "range, hills, rain, reliability", and you're willing to pay extra for that combination and live with the extra weight, the City Pro earns its place in your hallway. For most urban riders without extreme terrain or weather, though, the NAMI Stellar feels like the more rewarding long-term companion.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | NAMI Stellar | APOLLO City Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ✅ 1,37 €/Wh | ❌ 1,72 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ✅ 22,18 €/km/h | ❌ 32,02 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ❌ 32,06 g/Wh | ✅ 30,73 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | ✅ 0,52 kg/km/h | ❌ 0,57 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ✅ 34,12 €/km | ❌ 36,64 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ❌ 0,80 kg/km | ✅ 0,66 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ❌ 24,95 Wh/km | ✅ 21,33 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ✅ 20,00 W/km/h | ❌ 19,42 W/km/h |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | ✅ 0,026 kg/W | ❌ 0,0295 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ❌ 147,46 W | ✅ 213,33 W |
These metrics are a ruthlessly numerical way of looking at efficiency and value. Price per Wh and per km/h show how much you pay for energy capacity and headline speed. Weight-related metrics show how much scooter you're lugging around for each unit of performance or range. Wh per km estimates how efficiently each scooter uses its battery in real riding. Power-to-speed and weight-to-power indicate how "overbuilt" or "underpowered" a scooter is relative to its velocity, and average charging speed tells you how quickly you can realistically get back on the road. Remember, though: they don't capture ride feel, comfort or build quality - just the maths.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | NAMI Stellar | APOLLO City Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ✅ Noticeably lighter to lift | ❌ Heavier, awkward to carry |
| Range | ❌ Commuter-distance, not touring | ✅ Goes further per charge |
| Max Speed | ❌ Slightly lower ceiling | ✅ Higher top-speed headroom |
| Power | ❌ Single motor, decent pull | ✅ Dual motors, stronger shove |
| Battery Size | ❌ Smaller commuter pack | ✅ Larger, more capacity |
| Suspension | ✅ Plush, highly adjustable | ❌ Firmer, less sophisticated |
| Design | ✅ Industrial, enthusiast appeal | ✅ Sleek, integrated, award-winning |
| Safety | ✅ Superb headlight, stable frame | ✅ Signals, regen, IP66 rating |
| Practicality | ✅ Easier to move, simple fold | ❌ Heavy, wide, less compact |
| Comfort | ✅ Softer, less fatigue | ❌ Good, but firmer overall |
| Features | ❌ Fewer integrated gadgets | ✅ App, signals, regen lever |
| Serviceability | ✅ Exposed, DIY-friendly layout | ❌ More closed, complex |
| Customer Support | ✅ Strong dealers, responsive | ✅ Very customer-centric brand |
| Fun Factor | ✅ Playful, "mini hyper" feel | ❌ More sensible, appliance-like |
| Build Quality | ✅ Overbuilt frame, very solid | ✅ Dense, rattle-free construction |
| Component Quality | ✅ Great suspension, good hardware | ✅ Strong motors, robust details |
| Brand Name | ✅ Respected enthusiast favourite | ✅ Mainstream, design-led brand |
| Community | ✅ Passionate, mod-happy owners | ✅ Active, engaged user base |
| Lights (visibility) | ✅ Very bright headlight, horn | ✅ Signals, brake alert, 360° |
| Lights (illumination) | ✅ Better road illumination | ❌ More about being seen |
| Acceleration | ❌ Strong, but single-motor | ✅ Quicker, especially uphill |
| Arrive with smile factor | ✅ Big grin, every time | ❌ Impressed, less giddy |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ✅ Extremely low fatigue | ✅ Smooth, secure commuter |
| Charging speed | ❌ Slower relative to size | ✅ Fast for large battery |
| Reliability | ✅ Solid core, minor bolt checks | ✅ Mature revisions, robust design |
| Folded practicality | ✅ Folds smaller, hooks well | ❌ Fixed bar, bulkier folded |
| Ease of transport | ✅ Lighter, easier stairs | ❌ Heavy, harder to lug |
| Handling | ✅ Agile, fun, composed | ✅ Very stable at speed |
| Braking performance | ❌ Strong but conventional | ✅ Regen + drums excel |
| Riding position | ✅ Natural stance, good deck | ✅ Comfortable, roomy cockpit |
| Handlebar quality | ✅ Wide, solid, confidence | ✅ Wide, stable, ergonomic |
| Throttle response | ✅ Sine-wave, ultra-smooth | ✅ MACH control, very refined |
| Dashboard/Display | ✅ Large, bright, customisable | ❌ Good, but less special |
| Security (locking) | ✅ NFC start adds layer | ✅ App lock and features |
| Weather protection | ❌ Adequate, but cautious | ✅ Confident heavy-rain use |
| Resale value | ✅ Holds value, NAMI name | ✅ Strong demand, known model |
| Tuning potential | ✅ Highly tweakable for enthusiasts | ❌ More locked-in ecosystem |
| Ease of maintenance | ✅ Open layout, simple access | ❌ Integrated, trickier DIY work |
| Value for Money | ✅ Premium feel for less | ❌ Excellent, but pricey |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the NAMI Stellar scores 6 points against the APOLLO City Pro's 4. In the Author's Category Battle, the NAMI Stellar gets 30 ✅ versus 25 ✅ for APOLLO City Pro (with a few ties sprinkled in).
Totals: NAMI Stellar scores 36, APOLLO City Pro scores 29.
Based on the scoring, the NAMI Stellar is our overall winner. In day-to-day riding, the NAMI Stellar simply feels more special. It delivers that rare mix of solidity, comfort and smoothness that makes even grim city streets something you actually look forward to, and it does it without asking for a small fortune in return. The APOLLO City Pro is a strong, rational choice - particularly if you live in the land of rain and hills - but it never quite matches the Stellar's "I'll take the long way home" charm. If you choose the NAMI, you're buying into a riding experience that feels lovingly engineered rather than just cleverly packaged. The Apollo will quietly get the job done with competence and a lot of tech, but the Stellar is the one that's more likely to make you smile every single time you thumb the throttle.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.

