Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
If you want the scooter that feels more premium under your feet, rides smoother over bad roads, and is built like a "shrunken hyper-scooter" rather than a dressed-up rental, the NAMI Stellar is the stronger overall package. It brings big-scooter refinement into a compact, seriously solid commuter that still feels special every time you twist the throttle.
The APOLLO Explore 20 (Explore 2.0) fights back with better weather protection, big 10-inch tires, and a very low-maintenance setup that suits riders who just want to press "power" and go, rain or shine, with minimal tinkering. If you prioritise app features, lighting, and low maintenance over outright chassis quality and suspension feel, Apollo makes a strong case.
Both are good scooters; only one really feels like it's been engineered from the ground up as a premium ride. Read on to see which one matches your roads, your routine, and your patience for compromises.
Stick with the full comparison and you'll know exactly which one belongs in your hallway, not just on your wish list.
There's something almost comical about calling either of these "commuter scooters." The NAMI Stellar looks like someone took a world-famous hyper-scooter, left it in a hot wash, and it shrank just enough to be practical. The APOLLO Explore 20 looks more like a polished consumer product, the kind of thing you could park outside a design agency and not get laughed at.
I've put proper kilometres on both - battered city bike lanes, broken cobblestones, wet tram tracks, the usual urban assault course. On paper they're in the same weight and performance ballpark. On the road, they feel surprisingly different in how they deliver comfort, confidence, and day-to-day liveability.
If you're trying to decide whether to go "mini flagship" with NAMI or "smart commuter" with Apollo, this is exactly where it gets interesting. Let's unpack it.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
Both scooters live in that chunky, mid-tier commuter class: too heavy to be true last-mile toys, powerful enough to be real transport, but not so insane that you need motorcycle armour just to buy groceries.
NAMI Stellar targets riders who want a premium, plush ride and build quality trickled down from serious performance machines. Think "I commute daily, but I refuse to suffer." It's a compact cruiser that borrows its soul from big brothers like the Burn-E, then tones down the speed and weight to something you can actually own without a winch.
APOLLO Explore 20, on the other hand, is positioned as the "super commuter" with strong emphasis on weather resistance, visibility, and low maintenance - a scooter for someone who will ride in the rain, hates spanners, and loves apps. It's also priced noticeably lower, which will tempt buyers who stare more at their bank account than their welds.
Similar power class, similar weight, similar real-world range. Each claims to be a comfort king. That makes them absolutely fair game for a direct head-to-head.
Design & Build Quality
The design philosophies here couldn't be more different.
NAMI Stellar is all exposed tubular aluminium, thick welds and purposeful hardware. It looks like a piece of industrial equipment that just happens to go quickly. The one-piece welded frame means virtually no creaks, no "hinge vibes" when you bounce the deck, and a reassuring feeling that this thing will outlast your knees. The finish is mostly matte black, with that signature NAMI "naked" look: visible shocks, exposed linkages, and a big, bright central display that screams "serious machine".
APOLLO Explore 20 goes for a more consumer-friendly, finished appearance. Steel tubing wraps around the deck, partly as a frame, partly as styling. Cable routing is tidy and mostly internal, the colour accents are tasteful, and the whole package looks more like a mainstream product. The folding latch is chunky and - while slightly agricultural to operate - locks the stem down very securely.
In the hands and underfoot, though, the differences show. The Stellar's tubular frame feels overbuilt in a good way; grab the stem, rock it, and you're met with minimal flex. The deck is stiff, the stem clamp bites down properly, and the whole scooter communicates "this was designed by someone who hates wobble."
The Explore 20 is also solid and generally rattle-free, but there's a touch more "product" and a little less "platform" in the feel. The frame is strong, no question, but it doesn't have that same monolithic confidence the NAMI's welded chassis gives when you dive into a pothole at full tilt. Think of NAMI as the tool built for abuse, Apollo as the polished device built for daily duty.
If your priority is sheer structural seriousness, the Stellar has the edge. If you like your scooter to look like something designed by a UX team, you'll be more at home on the Explore.
Ride Comfort & Handling
Comfort is where this comparison gets delicious, because both manufacturers clearly know how bad city surfaces can be - and both tried to solve it in different ways.
Stellar brings full-blown, adjustable dual suspension that feels like someone took the dampers from a larger performance scooter and scaled them down without dumbing them down. Once you set preload for your weight, the scooter simply glides over broken pavement. Cobblestones, expansion joints, nasty patched tarmac - the suspension soaks it up before it ever gets to your ankles. Even with its slightly smaller wheels, the chassis does such a good job filtering impacts that you get this "floating on a short wheelbase cloud" sensation.
In fast corners, the Stellar feels planted and neutral. The wide handlebars give you leverage to lean it precisely, and the compact size makes it flickable through tight gaps. Despite the comfort, it never feels vague. You can carve bike lanes at a brisk cruise speed and the frame just shrugs off mid-corner bumps.
Explore 20 counters with its triple-spring suspension and 10-inch tubeless tyres. The larger wheels definitely help when you roll straight into deeper cracks or tram tracks; they bridge gaps that the Stellar's smaller tyres sometimes "fall into" with a sharper hit. The spring setup is soft enough to be genuinely comfy and, with those air-filled 10-inch tyres, you can plough over most city scars without flinching.
However, the suspension on the Apollo, while plush, doesn't feel quite as sophisticated. It's very comfortable in a straight line and at moderate pace, but push hard over repeated big hits and it can feel a bit more bouncy and less controlled than the NAMI's setup. Great for cruisy commutes, slightly less confidence-inspiring when you start riding it like you're late to everything.
Net result: if your metric is "arrive home with knees and wrists intact", both succeed. If your metric is "feel like you're riding a small, well-sorted performance chassis rather than a comfy appliance", the Stellar edges ahead.
Performance
Neither of these scooters is trying to be a rocket, and that's actually a blessing. They sit in that sweet urban band where you're fast enough to have fun, but not so fast that your brain is constantly writing its will.
NAMI Stellar runs a beefy rear motor with NAMI's trademark sine-wave controller. The first thing you notice is how silky the throttle feels. From creeping through pedestrian zones at walking speed to blasting along an empty riverside path, power delivery is progressive and predictable. It pulls strongly up to its cruising range, then just settles into a very relaxed hum. No whining, no cogging, no "digital on/off" feeling - just smooth, controllable shove.
Acceleration off the line is surprisingly assertive for a single-motor commuter. You beat rental scooters and most casual cyclists with ease, and you merge into city flow without drama. Hills in typical European cities? The Stellar shrugs them off. Extremely steep, sustained gradients do remind you that it's still a single-motor machine, but for the kind of inclines most commuters face, it doesn't feel underpowered.
APOLLO Explore 20 uses a slightly lower-voltage system but with a strong peak output through its Mach controller. The takeaway on the road: it feels lively enough. Off the line, the Apollo jumps forward eagerly, especially in the sportier modes, and it keeps pulling convincingly up to its top speed, which sits just a bit below the Stellar's upper range. In real city use, that difference is modest, but noticeable when you've got a long, empty stretch and you're feeling spicy.
Hill performance on the Apollo is decent; it doesn't give up easily, particularly when you engage its more aggressive mode. But with both scooters ridden back-to-back on the same incline, the Stellar feels like it has a touch more composure and drive once the gradient gets rude, helped by that very refined controller behaviour.
Braking is another interesting split. The Stellar uses mechanical discs with strong regen. The levers have a familiar bicycle feel, and once bedded in, the stopping power is absolutely appropriate for the speed class. Add NAMI's excellent electronic braking, and you can haul the scooter down with authority - and tune how aggressively it slows when you release the throttle.
The Explore 20 bets on dual drum brakes and a dedicated regen thumb throttle. Objectively, the system works: brakes are weather-sealed, fuss-free, and regen quickly becomes your go-to for routine slowing. But coming from decent discs, the lever feel is softer and less communicative. You stop in time, yes - but you don't quite get that sharp, connected feeling at the lever that inspires aggressive riding.
If you like a scooter that feels "mechanical" and precise in its responses, the NAMI's performance package is more rewarding. If you prioritise set-and-forget, low-maintenance stopping with enough performance but not much drama, the Apollo does the job.
Battery & Range
Both manufacturers, like everyone else in the industry, quote optimistic ranges that assume a lightweight rider cruising at "grandma speed" on billiard-table tarmac. In the real world, the story is more honest - and more relevant.
NAMI Stellar carries a mid-size battery aimed firmly at daily commuting rather than all-day touring. Ridden like a real person - stop-start city traffic, some hills, cruising at proper speeds rather than legal-limit crawling - you're looking at a comfortable one-way trip well into double-digit kilometres, with safety buffer to get back home or detour to the good bakery. If you absolutely pin it the whole way, you'll eat into that safety margin, but for typical city routines, range anxiety isn't a daily guest.
APOLLO Explore 20 actually has the larger pack on paper, and in practice it does slightly outlast the Stellar when you normalise for riding style. Cruise at an honest commuter pace, mix in a few hills, and the Apollo can stretch a bit further before the display starts gently suggesting you think about a charger. It's more of a "there and back with room for errands" kind of range, assuming you're not riding flat-out all day.
Charging is also a factor. The Stellar's pack, being smaller, comes back to full overnight or during a regular workday on the supplied charger without drama. The Explore's battery, with more capacity but a slower stock charger, takes noticeably longer to refill; you feel it if you regularly run it down deep.
In pure pragmatism, the Apollo gets you a bit more distance per charge. In everyday commuting where you're rarely hitting the bottom of the battery, both are fine - but if you do long rides often, the Explore's extra endurance is a genuine perk.
Portability & Practicality
Let's be blunt: neither of these is what I'd call "fun to carry". They're at that weight where one flight of stairs is okay, two flights are a workout, and three flights make you reconsider life choices.
Stellar sits in the mid-20-something kilo range. The good news is the weight feels central and compact, and the folded package isn't enormous. The stem locks to the deck so you can lift it as one piece without the usual "folded scooter trying to unfold in your hands" circus. The bad news is that, even with all that, this is not a scooter you'll want to lug onto a crowded tram every day.
Explore 20 is slightly heavier, and that extra mass is noticeable when you do have to lift it - especially as the bars don't fold. In narrow hallways or small car boots, the fixed-width cockpit can be awkward. On the upside, the tubular frame does give you handy places to grab or lock the scooter, and the sturdy kickstand holds the weight without drama.
For everyday practicality, the Stellar's slightly lower weight and more compact folded stance make it marginally easier to live with if you're regularly shuffling it into cars or through doorways. The Apollo counters with better weather sealing and less maintenance, so once it's parked, you worry less about cleaning and tweaking.
If your commute involves lots of carrying and multi-modal transport, to be honest, both are overkill. If you mostly roll from garage to street to office lift, the Stellar is a bit kinder on your back, the Apollo a bit kinder on your "can't be bothered to wrench" side.
Safety
Safety is more than just brakes - it's how the whole scooter supports you when things go wrong or when conditions are less than ideal.
NAMI Stellar scores big on structural stability and lighting. The frame inspires confidence at speed. The high-mounted headlight is properly bright - we're talking real illumination, not the usual decorative glow. You can ride unlit paths at night without bolting on three aftermarket lamps. Tyres are tubeless and reasonably wide for the wheel size, giving predictable grip. Mechanical discs plus good regen provide solid stopping ability, and the cockpit's NFC lock adds a small layer of security.
Its weakest link, safety-wise, is the smaller wheel diameter. Hit a square-edged pothole you didn't see? The 9-inch tyres will notice it more dramatically than 10-inch ones, even with the stellar suspension working hard to mask it. That said, once you know your roads, the combination of plush suspension, rigid chassis and powerful front light gives very high confidence.
Explore 20 leans heavily into visibility and weather proofing. The stem-mounted light is right in drivers' eye line, deck and rear lighting give you a clear silhouette, and integrated indicators are a nice touch. In grim weather or dark winter commutes, being lit up like a tasteful Christmas tree is no small advantage. The IP66 rating is class-leading at this price - you can ride through serious rain without nervously listening for electrical crackles.
The drum brakes and regen system are more than adequate for its speed, especially in the wet, where enclosed drums avoid some of the squeal and fade issues cheaper discs can suffer. The 10-inch tyres provide a slightly more forgiving contact patch over debris and cracks.
Overall, the Apollo plays the "safety through visibility and weather immunity" card extremely well. The NAMI plays "safety through mechanical competence and lighting that actually lets you see where you're going" just as convincingly. Choose your paranoia: rain and cars, or potholes and structure.
Community Feedback
| NAMI Stellar | APOLLO Explore 20 |
|---|---|
| What riders love | What riders love |
| Cloud-like suspension and smooth sine-wave power delivery; rock-solid tubular frame; genuinely bright headlight; premium TFT display and deep tuning; "mini flagship" feel at a mid-range price. | Very plush ride with 10-inch tubeless tyres; low-maintenance drum brakes and self-sealing tyres; outstanding lighting and visibility; strong app integration; serious water resistance. |
| What riders complain about | What riders complain about |
| Weight heavier than many expect from photos; 9-inch wheels not ideal for brutal potholes; mechanical brakes need occasional adjustment; odd loose screws out of the box; kickstand and fender rattles if not set up properly. | Heavy for a single-motor commuter; non-folding bars make storage tricky; top speed feels modest for its heft; drum brake feel less sharp than hydraulics; long standard charge time; occasional kickstand and fender noise. |
Price & Value
There's a clear price gap here: the Explore 20 undercuts the Stellar by a fairly noticeable chunk. On a pure wallet basis, Apollo makes the more "reasonable" offer, especially for riders who don't care what their frame welds look like as long as the scooter switches on in the rain.
Where the NAMI Stellar claws back justification is in how it feels, not what it lists on paper. You're paying extra for better suspension hardware, a more serious chassis, a genuinely high-end display and controller setup, and the intangible feeling that this is a downsized performance scooter rather than an upsized rental. For riders who keep scooters for years and actually feel the difference every day, that premium is easier to defend.
The Explore 20 gives you a lot for its money: solid power, excellent lighting, a biggish battery, tubeless self-healing tyres, and IP66. On raw features per euro, it's compelling. But some of that saving shows up in the more "appliance-like" riding character and in areas like brake feel and structural sophistication.
If you're extremely price-sensitive, Apollo's offer is strong. If you can stretch the budget and you care about ride quality as much as you say you do, NAMI's extra spend doesn't feel wasted.
Service & Parts Availability
NAMI works through established dealers who typically stock spares for their higher-end machines. That helps: the Stellar shares a lot of DNA with the rest of the NAMI family, so parts like controllers, suspension components and display units have a decent ecosystem around them. In Europe, several specialist shops know NAMI inside-out, which makes serious repairs and upgrades fairly straightforward - assuming you choose a reputable retailer.
Apollo has invested heavily in brand-side support, with service centres and a strong emphasis on direct customer care. In many regions, they'll be more visible than NAMI at the "mainstream" level, and their app-centric approach includes decent documentation and diagnostics. That said, some parts are quite proprietary, especially electronic bits tied to their ecosystem, so you're more dependent on Apollo channels rather than generic spares.
In practice, buy the Stellar from a good NAMI dealer and you're well covered for serious mechanical work. Buy the Explore 20 and you're buying into Apollo's own support network and parts pipeline. Both are workable; neither is a "mystery OEM with no spares", but NAMI leans a bit more towards enthusiast-friendly serviceability, Apollo towards branded after-sales.
Pros & Cons Summary
| NAMI Stellar | APOLLO Explore 20 |
|---|---|
| Pros | Pros |
|
|
| Cons | Cons |
|
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | NAMI Stellar | APOLLO Explore 20 |
|---|---|---|
| Motor power (nominal) | 1.000 W rear | 800 W rear |
| Top speed | 45-50 km/h | 40 km/h |
| Battery | 52 V 15,6 Ah (≈812 Wh) | 48 V 13,5 Ah (648 Wh) |
| Claimed range | Up to 50 km | 40-60 km (Eco) |
| Real-world range (approx.) | 30-35 km | 35-40 km |
| Weight | 25,5-27 kg | 27,2 kg |
| Brakes | Dual mechanical discs + regen | Front drum + strong regen |
| Suspension | Adjustable dual spring/coil (F/R) | Triple spring (dual rear, single front) |
| Tyres | 9" tubeless pneumatic | 10" tubeless pneumatic, self-healing |
| Max load | 110-120 kg | 120 kg |
| IP rating | IP55 | IP66 |
| Charging time (stock charger) | 5-6 h | 7,5 h |
| Price (approx.) | 1.109 € | 781 € |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
If you strip away marketing and focus on what these scooters are like to live with, a pattern emerges.
The NAMI Stellar feels like a genuine enthusiast machine that just happens to be tamed for commuting. The suspension is on another level, the frame confidence is tangible, the throttle behaviour is addictive, and the whole scooter radiates the same DNA as far more expensive hyper-scooters. If you spend a lot of time riding, if your roads are awful, and if you care about how a scooter feels as much as what it costs, the Stellar is the more complete, more satisfying package.
The APOLLO Explore 20 is the practicalist's choice: longer legs per charge, superb lighting, wet-weather immunity, and tyres and brakes designed so you almost never have to get your hands dirty. It's a good answer for riders who want a robust, app-enabled commuting tool and don't particularly care whether the chassis could double as a stunt scooter.
For my money - and my spine - the NAMI Stellar is the overall winner here. It turns every commute into something you actually look forward to, not just endure. The Explore 20 is an intelligent, functional option with attractive pricing, but if you want your scooter to feel like a shrunken performance machine rather than a competent appliance, the Stellar is the one that will keep you smiling long after the novelty wears off.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | NAMI Stellar | APOLLO Explore 20 |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ❌ 1,37 €/Wh | ✅ 1,21 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ❌ 22,18 €/km/h | ✅ 19,53 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ✅ 32,02 g/Wh | ❌ 41,98 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | ✅ 0,52 kg/km/h | ❌ 0,68 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ❌ 31,69 €/km | ✅ 19,53 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ❌ 0,74 kg/km | ✅ 0,68 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ❌ 23,20 Wh/km | ✅ 16,20 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ✅ 20,00 W/km/h | ✅ 20,00 W/km/h |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | ✅ 0,026 kg/W | ❌ 0,034 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ✅ 147,64 W | ❌ 86,40 W |
These metrics let you see how efficiently each scooter converts weight, money and charging time into speed, power and range. Lower values generally mean you get more performance or range for each euro, kilogram or watt-hour invested, while higher values in the power and charging rows indicate stronger acceleration potential and quicker battery refills. It's a cold, mathematical view that helpfully strips away brand and emotion - even if it doesn't tell the whole riding story.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | NAMI Stellar | APOLLO Explore 20 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ✅ Slightly lighter, more compact | ❌ Heavier for similar class |
| Range | ❌ Shorter real range | ✅ Goes further per charge |
| Max Speed | ✅ Higher top cruising | ❌ Slower at full tilt |
| Power | ✅ Stronger nominal motor | ❌ Less grunt overall |
| Battery Size | ✅ Bigger capacity pack | ❌ Smaller energy reserve |
| Suspension | ✅ More refined, adjustable | ❌ Plush but less controlled |
| Design | ✅ Industrial, premium feel | ❌ More generic product vibe |
| Safety | ✅ Strong chassis, headlight | ❌ Somewhat softer brake feel |
| Practicality | ✅ Compact, decent IP rating | ❌ Bulkier bars, heavier |
| Comfort | ✅ Cloud-like over rough stuff | ❌ Very good, but softer |
| Features | ✅ NFC, great TFT, tuning | ❌ Good, app but simpler dash |
| Serviceability | ✅ Enthusiast-friendly components | ❌ More proprietary ecosystem |
| Customer Support | ✅ Strong via specialist dealers | ✅ Strong brand-side network |
| Fun Factor | ✅ Mini hyper-scooter vibes | ❌ Feels more like appliance |
| Build Quality | ✅ Welded, rock-solid frame | ❌ Good, but less overbuilt |
| Component Quality | ✅ High-spec core hardware | ❌ Competent, some compromises |
| Brand Name | ✅ Premium enthusiast reputation | ✅ Strong mainstream presence |
| Community | ✅ Enthusiast-driven mod crowd | ✅ Active, app-centric users |
| Lights (visibility) | ❌ Strong, but less 360° | ✅ Superb all-round package |
| Lights (illumination) | ✅ Very bright headlight | ❌ Good, more for being seen |
| Acceleration | ✅ Smoother, stronger pull | ❌ Lively, but milder |
| Arrive with smile factor | ✅ Huge, ride feels special | ❌ More "job done" feeling |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ✅ Plush, composed chassis | ✅ Plush, forgiving setup |
| Charging speed | ✅ Faster refill time | ❌ Slower standard charger |
| Reliability | ✅ Strong core, minor fettling | ✅ Low-maintenance hardware |
| Folded practicality | ✅ Bars + frame more compact | ❌ Wide cockpit when folded |
| Ease of transport | ✅ Slightly kinder to carry | ❌ Heavier, awkward width |
| Handling | ✅ Sharper, more precise | ❌ Stable, but less incisive |
| Braking performance | ✅ Discs + strong regen | ❌ Drums adequate, softer feel |
| Riding position | ✅ Wide bars, solid stance | ✅ Roomy deck, comfortable |
| Handlebar quality | ✅ Sturdy, good leverage | ✅ Comfortable, ergonomic |
| Throttle response | ✅ Ultra-smooth sine wave | ❌ Good, less refined feel |
| Dashboard/Display | ✅ Bright TFT, very clear | ❌ Dot-matrix, less legible |
| Security (locking) | ✅ NFC adds start protection | ❌ App lock only auxiliary |
| Weather protection | ❌ Good IP55 baseline | ✅ Excellent IP66 rating |
| Resale value | ✅ Strong NAMI reputation | ✅ Recognised, desirable brand |
| Tuning potential | ✅ Deep controller settings | ❌ More locked-in ecosystem |
| Ease of maintenance | ✅ Standard parts, enthusiast help | ✅ Low wrenching needed |
| Value for Money | ✅ Premium feel justifies price | ❌ Cheaper, but more compromises |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the NAMI Stellar scores 5 points against the APOLLO Explore 20's 6. In the Author's Category Battle, the NAMI Stellar gets 36 ✅ versus 12 ✅ for APOLLO Explore 20 (with a few ties sprinkled in).
Totals: NAMI Stellar scores 41, APOLLO Explore 20 scores 18.
Based on the scoring, the NAMI Stellar is our overall winner. In the end, the NAMI Stellar is the scooter that feels like a treat every time you roll it out the door - the kind of machine that turns a boring commute into a little slice of joy, even when the road surface looks like a war crime. The Apollo Explore 20 is a sensible, capable workhorse that does its job well, but it never quite shakes the feeling of being "a good tool" rather than "a great ride." If you want something you'll still love in two years, not just tolerate, the Stellar's blend of comfort, chassis confidence and premium feel simply lands better on real streets with real riders.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.

