Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
The RAZOR C35 edges out as the better overall commuter: it rides calmer on bad roads, feels sturdier under stress, and gives you more real-world usefulness for less money, even if it looks a bit "industrial utility" next to the OKAI. The OKAI Neon fights back with far nicer design, much better battery capacity and range, and that party-trick lighting that makes night rides genuinely fun, but its comfort and value story are less convincing once you stop admiring it from the pavement.
Pick the RAZOR C35 if you care more about a smooth, confidence-inspiring ride and reliable basics than apps and RGB. Go for the OKAI Neon if you want a stylish, feature-rich city scooter with better range, don't mind a firmer rear end, and mostly ride on decent asphalt.
If you want the full picture - including where the Neon quietly wins on tech and where the Razor's big front wheel saves your teeth - keep reading.
Electric scooters in this price band are a brutal compromise game: a bit more speed here, a bit less comfort there, and always someone lying about range. The OKAI Neon and the RAZOR C35 sit right in that mid-budget commuter space, aimed at people who want something better than a supermarket special but don't need a mini motorcycle under their feet.
The Neon is the fashion-forward choice: sleek, heavily stylised, app-enabled, and lit up like a rolling sci-fi prop. It's for riders who want their scooter to look as good leaning against a café wall as it feels on the road. The C35, by contrast, is the sensible shoes of the pair: big front wheel, steel frame, simple controls - built more like a tool than a toy, and happier smashing through broken city tarmac than posing on Instagram.
Both promise grown-up commuting without grown-up hyper-scooter prices - but they get there in very different ways. Let's see which compromises you'll actually enjoy living with.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
Both scooters live in the "serious first scooter" bracket: affordable enough not to feel reckless, but credible enough to replace short car or public transport trips. They're capped around typical European legal speeds, carry an adult without complaining too much, and claim ranges that - on the box at least - sound commute-worthy.
The OKAI Neon aims at the urban rider who values design, app features, and a polished, almost consumer-electronics feel. Think students, younger professionals, design-savvy city folk who like a bit of tech flourish with their mobility.
The RAZOR C35 goes after pragmatic commuters and first-timers who are uneasy about tiny wheels and plasticky frames. It feels more like a stripped-back utility vehicle: fewer toys, more metal, and a geometry that clearly prioritises stability over style points.
They're natural rivals because they ask roughly the same money class for two different answers to the same question: "What should my first real electric scooter be?"
Design & Build Quality
Parking these two side by side is almost comical. The OKAI Neon looks like it just rolled off a design fair stand: clean lines, hidden cables, a circular stem display that wouldn't look out of place in a concept car, and that stem-and-deck lighting that turns heads at traffic lights. The frame feels like a single, coherent piece rather than an assembly of parts. In your hands, it has that solid, die-cast feel - not ultra-light, but reassuringly dense.
The RAZOR C35, on the other hand, looks like someone welded together a commuter scooter and a BMX front wheel. There's exposed steel, visible bolts, and a big slabby deck. It's more workshop than showroom. But once you grab the bars and bounce on it a bit, the logic clicks: the steel frame is stiff, the stem doesn't flex nervously, and there's a sense of over-engineering that's rare in this price bracket. It feels like it will shrug off knocks that would leave the Neon scuffed and sulking.
Fit and finish go to the Neon. The integration of the display, routing of cables, and overall visual cleanliness are in another league compared with the C35's practical but slightly clunky cockpit and simple LED panel. But if your idea of build quality includes "I can crash this against a bike rack and not cry", the Razor's steel chassis and big, chunky components have their own appeal.
Design philosophy in one line: the Neon wants to be a lifestyle object; the C35 wants to be a durable appliance. Your personality will decide which one feels "right".
Ride Comfort & Handling
This is where their characters really diverge.
The OKAI Neon relies on a hybrid setup: an air-filled front tyre, a solid rear tyre, and a hidden rear suspension element trying to tame that solid wheel. On smooth or mildly textured city asphalt, it works surprisingly well. The front soaks up the first hit of bumps; the rear suspension takes the edge off the nastier ones. For the first several kilometres of decent pavement, it feels composed and quite refined. Start hitting cracked roads or mild cobbles, though, and the story changes: the rear starts transmitting more of the chatter into your knees, and after a longer ride over rougher surfaces you'll know exactly which wheel is solid.
The RAZOR C35 skips suspension altogether and instead brings that huge front "SuperCushion" tyre and a smaller rear air tyre. In practice, that big front wheel is a cheat code. It just rolls over pothole lips and nasty expansion joints the Neon's smaller front wheel will notice. On typical battered city streets, the C35 feels calmer, less twitchy, and more forgiving. Your hands and forearms stay fresher, and you're less on edge about every shadow on the road possibly being a rim-killer. The rear is still harsher than a proper suspended setup, but both ends being pneumatic gives it a smoother, more "floating" feel over bad patches than the Neon's mixed arrangement.
In corners, the Neon feels nimble and compact, with a low centre of gravity from its deck-mounted battery. It's easy to thread through tight traffic and hop around pedestrians - it feels like a sleek city gadget. The C35 feels a bit longer and more planted; that big front wheel leads you into corners with a sense of security rather than playfulness. It's not clumsy, but it clearly prioritises stability over sharp, sporty steering.
If your commute is mostly decent roads with the odd crack, the Neon is comfortable enough and feels a touch more "light on its feet." If your reality is broken tarmac, surprise potholes and the occasional gravel path, the C35's giant front tyre is worth its weight in ibuprofen.
Performance
Neither of these is a rocket, and that's fine - they're commuters, not drag racers. But they approach performance differently.
The OKAI Neon's motor feels tuned for smooth, friendly acceleration. Off the line, it's brisk enough to leave bicycles behind but never yanks your arms. In its sportiest mode it will happily climb to its legal-limit speed and sit there with decent composure on flat ground. As the battery drains down past the final chunk, you do feel it lose some enthusiasm, and on steeper hills with a heavier rider, you're very much in "patient progress" territory.
The RAZOR C35 has a bit more shove in reserve. Its rear-hub motor feels more eager when you thumb the throttle, especially from low speed. Because the drive wheel is under your weight, traction is solid, and the front wheel just leads the way without trying to spin. It will run a bit faster than the Neon at the top end, which on open bike paths and longer stretches gives it a more relaxed, less "straining" feel. On modest urban inclines it copes reasonably well; on serious hills it, too, will bog down, but it does hang on slightly better in that marginal, almost-too-steep zone.
Braking is another philosophical split. The Neon uses a rear mechanical disc combined with an electronic front brake. Once you've learned its character, it can haul you down confidently from top speed, but the front electronic brake can feel a bit grabby if you're ham-fisted, especially at low speed or in the wet. You quickly learn to modulate it, but the learning curve is there.
The C35 pairs a hand-operated electronic rear brake with a good, old-fashioned stomp-on fender brake. It's not glamorous, but it's very honest: squeeze for most situations, stomp if you need extra bite or if in some distant future the electronics misbehave. Total stopping power is adequate rather than spectacular - you're limited by tyre grip and weight transfer - but the communication through the lever and deck is clear, and you never feel like the scooter is doing something mysterious mid-stop.
If you care about slightly perkier acceleration and a marginally higher cruising speed, the C35 feels the livelier machine. If you prefer gentler throttle behaviour and like having a dedicated disc brake in the mix, the Neon's package may be more your style - just expect to need a couple of rides before your fingers fully trust that electronic front assist.
Battery & Range
On paper, the OKAI Neon absolutely dwarfs the RAZOR C35 here - its battery is in another league. And that does translate into real-world advantage, though not quite to the fantasy numbers on the spec sheet.
In realistic mixed-mode riding, the Neon will comfortably cover typical city commutes with margin: think daily return trips that add up to the low-twenties in kilometres without you sweating over the gauge. If you nurse it in its gentler mode, keep to flatter routes and you're not on the heavier side, you can push into the higher-twenties and beyond. But you won't see the box-claim extremes unless you're riding like an indoor test dummy. Still, for the class, its usable range is genuinely decent.
The RAZOR C35's Lithium version packs a much smaller energy tank. In practice, you're looking at a usable distance that suits short-to-medium commutes in one direction, or a round trip if you're lighter and not hammering sport mode the whole way. Expect to want a charger waiting at work if your daily return trip creeps up into double-digit kilometre territory. A solid hour of spirited riding will usually put you in the "start planning the end of this outing" zone.
Charging dynamics are also tilted: both charge over several hours, but the Neon's larger pack means its charge feels more like a true overnight or full workday event, while the C35's smaller battery, though slower on paper, feels easier to recover from empty during a normal day. You're simply refilling a smaller tank.
Range anxiety perspective: with the Neon, you mostly forget about it as long as your commute isn't extreme. With the C35, you're more aware that you own an urban short-hop tool - fine if you accept that from day one, frustrating if you bought it believing every optimistic brochure line.
Portability & Practicality
Weight-wise, these two are in the same ballpark, with the Razor actually a touch lighter on the Lithium version. In the hand, though, they carry very differently.
The OKAI Neon's folding system is clean and slick. The stem locks down neatly, it hooks onto the rear, and the overall package feels balanced when you grab it. It's still a mid-weight scooter - carrying it up more than a couple of flights routinely will get old - but for short stairs, car boots, and the odd train platform dash, it behaves fairly well. The clean design also means fewer sharp edges to snag on clothing or bags.
The RAZOR C35 folds its stem quickly enough, but the massive front wheel means the folded silhouette is taller and a bit more awkward. The handlebars don't fold in, so you're essentially carrying a long, narrow "L" shape with a huge tyre at one end. The weight itself isn't absurd, but manoeuvring it through narrow doors or crowded train aisles feels clumsier than with the more compact Neon. It's absolutely manageable - just not elegant.
Day-to-day practicality is a more even affair. The Neon's IP rating and decent rear mudguard make wet-weather survivability good for a city machine, and its stem hook for bags is surprisingly useful for quick grocery stops. The downside is its app dependency for some setup steps and the occasional Bluetooth mood swing, which can turn a simple first-ride into a small tech support session if your phone or OS isn't playing nice.
The C35 goes the opposite way: no app, no NFC tricks, no firmware drama - just a keyless, hop-on-and-go experience. You'll want to budget for a proper physical lock, since there's no electronic immobiliser, but the lack of "smart" features also means you never stare at your phone while the scooter refuses to acknowledge your existence.
Safety
Safety is a mix of how the scooter behaves when everything's fine - and how it behaves when things are not.
The OKAI Neon scores highly on visibility. The full ambient lighting along the stem and deck doesn't just look good; it makes you very hard to miss from the side, which is exactly where a lot of car-vs-scooter near-misses happen. The main headlight is adequate for lit city streets, and the brake light does its job. Braking performance is reassuring once you're used to that electronic front intervention, and the low-slung battery helps keep the scooter settled in turns.
The RAZOR C35 plays a different safety card: physics. That big front pneumatic wheel dramatically reduces your chance of being caught out by a nasty crack, tram rail, or small pothole. When you're tired, distracted, or riding at night, that is real-world safety, not just marketing. The lighting setup is straightforward but functional - proper headlight, and a brake-activated rear light that brightens as it should. Add in the UL certification for the electrical system, and there's also some comfort in knowing the battery pack has been tortured in a lab before living under your deck.
In emergency stops, the Neon gives you more "proper scooter" feel thanks to the disc plus electronic combo, but can be a touch abrupt if you grab a handful without practice. The C35's dual rear-brake concept isn't glamorous, yet the redundancy is reassuring: lever for most situations, heel for "I really want to stop now".
If your biggest fear is being hit because drivers don't see you, the Neon's light show is a real asset. If your nightmare is being pitched over the bars by some evil city pothole, the C35's front wheel is your friend.
Community Feedback
| OKAI Neon | RAZOR C35 |
|---|---|
What riders love
|
What riders love
|
What riders complain about
|
What riders complain about
|
Price & Value
When you line up what you get per euro, the picture is mixed but leans towards the Razor if you're being strictly hard-nosed about commuting.
The OKAI Neon asks for a decent mid-range price and gives you quality design, a much larger battery, suspension, water protection, and a genuinely premium aesthetic. You're paying not just for transport, but for "owning something nice". If that matters to you - and for many daily riders, it does - the Neon's price is not unreasonable. But its range claims are optimistic, and the flashy extras don't directly make commuting cheaper or simpler.
The RAZOR C35 comes in notably cheaper, yet still delivers a trustworthy frame, a smoother ride on rough tarmac than most in its class, a reliable motor, and a proper big-brand safety pedigree. Yes, the battery is small and the feature set bare-bones, but if your use case is modest daily mileage and you value that big-wheel composure, you're getting a lot of real-world utility for the money.
Summed up: the Neon gives you the nicer object; the C35 gives you more bang-per-euro if your priority is simply getting to work and back without drama.
Service & Parts Availability
OKAI has deep roots as an OEM for sharing fleets, which shows in hardware reliability. But as a consumer brand, they're still building out service channels. In Europe, parts availability is decent but not quite at "walk into any bike shop and they know it" level. Electronic components and cosmetic parts can take some hunting, depending on where you live, though the core mechanical bits are fairly standard scooter fare.
RAZOR, on the other hand, has been shipping scooters into European households for years, and that distribution network matters. Getting basic spares - tyres, tubes, brake components - is generally easier, and more mechanics at least recognise the brand even if they haven't seen this specific model. Documentation and exploded diagrams tend to be more visible, which is helpful for DIY fixes. It's still not like owning a bicycle from a century-old Euro brand, but in scooter land, Razor is relatively "known".
If you're the sort who keeps hardware for years and likes to keep it alive with occasional part swaps, the C35 has a slight edge in long-term service friendliness. The Neon isn't bad; it just feels a bit more "ecosystem-y" and less generic in some of its components.
Pros & Cons Summary
| OKAI Neon | RAZOR C35 |
|---|---|
Pros
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
Cons
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | OKAI Neon | RAZOR C35 (Li-ion) |
|---|---|---|
| Motor power (rated) | 300 W front hub | 350 W rear hub |
| Top speed | 25 km/h | 29 km/h |
| Stated range | bis zu 40-55 km | bis zu 29 km |
| Real-world range (est.) | ca. 22,5 km | ca. 20 km |
| Battery energy | ca. 353 Wh | 185 Wh |
| Battery voltage / capacity | 36 V / 9,8 Ah | 37 V / 5,0 Ah |
| Weight | 16,0 kg | 14,63 kg |
| Brakes | Front electronic + rear disc | Rear electronic + rear fender |
| Suspension | Hidden rear suspension | None (pneumatic tyres only) |
| Tires | Front 8,5" pneumatic, rear 8,5" solid | Front 12,5" pneumatic, rear 8,5" pneumatic |
| Max load | 100 kg | 100 kg |
| IP rating | IP55 | n/a (no official IP) |
| Charging time | 6 h | 8 h |
| Price (approx.) | 508 € | 378 € |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
In everyday use, the RAZOR C35 comes out as the more forgiving, less fussy partner. That huge front wheel and sturdy frame do more for your actual stress levels on a battered commute than RGB lights or app-tuned ride modes. It accelerates a touch harder, cruises a little faster, and for shorter urban distances it simply gets on with the job with minimal drama and a pleasantly "old-school mechanical" vibe.
The OKAI Neon, though, isn't just a pretty face. If your riding is mostly on half-decent streets and you actually need that extra stretch of range, the Neon is the more capable travel companion. It feels more modern under your hands, looks far better parked, and its lighting and display are genuinely satisfying in daily use. You just have to accept that the rear end is firmer, the range claims are optimistic, and you're paying a premium for the design and tech sheen.
So, the split is clear: if you want the calmer, rough-road-friendly workhorse and your commute is modest in length, the RAZOR C35 is the smarter, better-value choice. If you're drawn to attractive hardware, want more range in the tank, and ride mainly on civilised tarmac, the OKAI Neon will make you happier to look at - and reasonably happy to ride.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | OKAI Neon | RAZOR C35 |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ✅ 1,44 €/Wh | ❌ 2,04 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ❌ 20,32 €/km/h | ✅ 13,03 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ✅ 45,33 g/Wh | ❌ 79,08 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | ❌ 0,64 kg/km/h | ✅ 0,50 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ❌ 22,58 €/km | ✅ 18,90 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ✅ 0,71 kg/km | ❌ 0,73 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ❌ 15,69 Wh/km | ✅ 9,25 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ❌ 12,00 W/km/h | ✅ 12,07 W/km/h |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | ❌ 0,0533 kg/W | ✅ 0,0418 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ✅ 58,83 W | ❌ 23,13 W |
These metrics strip away the marketing and look at pure ratios: how much battery you get for the price, how heavy each scooter is relative to its power and range, how efficiently they use their energy, and how fast they refill their packs. Lower cost and weight per unit of performance usually favour practicality; higher power per speed and higher charging rate mean a punchier and more convenient ride. None of this captures feel, but it does show where each scooter is objectively frugal - or wasteful - with your euros, watts and kilograms.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | OKAI Neon | RAZOR C35 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ❌ Slightly heavier overall | ✅ Lighter, easier to lift |
| Range | ✅ Bigger usable range | ❌ Shorter daily distance |
| Max Speed | ❌ Slower top pace | ✅ A bit faster cruising |
| Power | ❌ Softer overall pull | ✅ Stronger, perkier motor |
| Battery Size | ✅ Much larger battery | ❌ Small energy reserve |
| Suspension | ✅ Rear suspension present | ❌ Tyres only, no shocks |
| Design | ✅ Sleek, futuristic styling | ❌ Utilitarian, less refined |
| Safety | ✅ Superb visibility, IP rating | ❌ Less visible, no IP |
| Practicality | ❌ App quirks, heavier carry | ✅ Simple, no-nonsense use |
| Comfort | ❌ Solid rear harsher | ✅ Big wheel smooths shocks |
| Features | ✅ Lights, NFC, app tools | ❌ Bare-bones feature set |
| Serviceability | ❌ More proprietary feel | ✅ Simpler, generic parts |
| Customer Support | ❌ Growing, still inconsistent | ✅ Established brand support |
| Fun Factor | ✅ Flashy, customisable vibes | ❌ Sensible, less playful |
| Build Quality | ✅ Tight, rattle-free build | ❌ Sturdy but more basic |
| Component Quality | ✅ Nicer cockpit, finishing | ❌ Functional, less premium |
| Brand Name | ❌ Less known to consumers | ✅ Widely recognised brand |
| Community | ❌ Smaller owner community | ✅ Larger Razor ecosystem |
| Lights (visibility) | ✅ Standout side visibility | ❌ Standard basic lighting |
| Lights (illumination) | ✅ Better overall presence | ❌ Adequate but ordinary |
| Acceleration | ❌ Milder, softer launch | ✅ Snappier off the line |
| Arrive with smile factor | ✅ Looks and lights impress | ❌ Satisfying but less special |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ❌ Harsher on bad roads | ✅ Calm, stable composure |
| Charging speed | ✅ Faster refill per Wh | ❌ Slower to recharge |
| Reliability | ✅ Solid hardware record | ✅ Proven Razor toughness |
| Folded practicality | ✅ Cleaner, neater package | ❌ Bulky with big wheel |
| Ease of transport | ❌ Heavier, less compact | ✅ Lighter, if still bulky |
| Handling | ❌ Harsher over rough stuff | ✅ Stable, forgiving steering |
| Braking performance | ✅ Disc plus e-brake combo | ❌ Rear-biased, less refined |
| Riding position | ✅ Comfortable, upright stance | ❌ Fixed height less adaptable |
| Handlebar quality | ✅ Cleaner, more premium bar | ❌ Basic but functional |
| Throttle response | ❌ Very gentle, less crisp | ✅ More immediate feel |
| Dashboard/Display | ✅ Bright, stylish round display | ❌ Simple, dated LEDs |
| Security (locking) | ✅ NFC adds quick lock | ❌ Physical lock only |
| Weather protection | ✅ Proper IP rating | ❌ Less documented sealing |
| Resale value | ❌ Less brand recognition | ✅ Easier to resell Razor |
| Tuning potential | ❌ Closed, app-centric system | ✅ Simpler to tinker with |
| Ease of maintenance | ❌ Solid rear complicates tyres | ✅ Standard pneumatic setup |
| Value for Money | ❌ Pricier for core utility | ✅ Strong utility per euro |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the OKAI Neon scores 4 points against the RAZOR C35's 6. In the Author's Category Battle, the OKAI Neon gets 21 ✅ versus 19 ✅ for RAZOR C35.
Totals: OKAI Neon scores 25, RAZOR C35 scores 25.
Based on the scoring, it's a tie! Both scooters have their strengths. Between these two, the RAZOR C35 ends up feeling like the scooter you rely on, while the OKAI Neon feels like the scooter you enjoy looking at. The C35's big-wheel calmness and no-nonsense attitude make everyday riding a little less stressful, even if it never quite makes your heart race. The Neon sprinkles in more charm, more tech, and more range, but asks you to live with a firmer ride and a higher price for the privilege. If I had to live with one for grimy, real-world commuting, I'd lean Razor - but I'd secretly miss the Neon's sci-fi glow every time I rolled home at dusk.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.

