Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
The LEVY Original takes the overall win as the more rounded, genuinely practical commuter: lighter, easier to live with in a flat or office, and far more flexible thanks to its swappable battery and better braking setup. It feels like it was designed by people who actually haul scooters up stairs.
The RAZOR C35 still makes sense if you ride on rough, beat-up streets and value that huge front wheel and tank-like steel frame more than portability or tech niceties. Choose the RAZOR if your roads are bad but your commute is short; choose the LEVY if your stairs are long and your day is unpredictable.
Both will get you to work; only one really behaves like a long-term tool rather than a compromise. Read on to see where each shines, and where the shine wears off.
Stick around - the devil is in the riding impressions, not the spec sheet.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
On paper, the RAZOR C35 and the LEVY Original live in the same neighbourhood: single-motor city scooters with commuter-friendly speeds, pneumatic tyres and no fancy suspension. They sit in the entry to lower mid-range price bracket, aimed squarely at people who want a daily workhorse rather than a weekend adrenaline machine.
The overlap is simple: both claim to be "everyday commuters" for adults, offering sensible speeds, manageable weights and enough range for real-world urban errands. Yet they come at that mission from very different angles. RAZOR leans on a big front wheel and a chunky steel frame - a sort of "industrial nostalgia" play. LEVY bets everything on portability, modular batteries and liveable ownership.
If you're choosing your first "serious" scooter and you've narrowed it down to these two, you're basically deciding between road-taming comfort and day-to-day practicality. Let's break that down properly.
Design & Build Quality
Pick up the RAZOR C35 and the first thing you notice is the steel. It feels more like a small piece of street furniture than consumer electronics. The big front wheel, exposed frame and utilitarian deck give it a slightly old-school, industrial vibe. There's very little flex in the chassis; stamping on the deck feels like jumping on a manhole cover. The downside is that it looks and feels a bit dated, like a budget commuter bike dressed up as a scooter.
The LEVY Original goes the other way: clean lines, aluminium chassis, battery tucked into a thick stem, and far fewer "toy store" cues. In the hands it feels tighter and more refined. The folding hinge is compact but reassuringly solid, and there's less of that budget-scooter rattle after a few weeks of abuse. Accessories are slightly trickier to mount on the fatter stem, but overall it has the more modern, grown-up presence.
In pure build feel, the C35's steel frame inspires confidence that you can whack it into a kerb and come away with scratched paint at worst. The LEVY feels less bomb-proof in a crash-test sense, but more precisely put together. Day to day, most riders will appreciate the LEVY's cleaner, less clunky design more than the C35's "urban tractor" aesthetic.
Ride Comfort & Handling
This is where the RAZOR C35 actually surprises people. That oversized front tyre is not just a gimmick: when you hit a nasty expansion joint or a shallow pothole at commuting speed, the big wheel simply rolls over it with a shrug. The rear is smaller, so you still feel some kick through your heels, but compared with typical small-wheel budget scooters the front end feels almost plush. On torn-up cycle lanes and patched tarmac, the C35 is the calmer of the two.
The LEVY relies on a pair of equal-sized, air-filled tyres. On decent city asphalt it glides nicely; there's a pleasant, longboard-like flex in the deck and the steering feels neutral. Start throwing it at broken cobbles and sharp edges, though, and you'll be reminded there's no suspension and no oversized wheel to bail you out. It's fine if you read the road a bit; less forgiving if you ride like you're half-asleep.
Handling wise, the LEVY feels lighter and more nimble. Darting around pedestrians, weaving through stopped traffic or making quick line changes in a bike lane is easier thanks to its lower weight and balanced wheelbase. The C35 feels steadier and more planted, especially at its top speed, but also more reluctant to change direction quickly. Think "comfortable cruiser" versus "city runabout".
Performance
Both scooters sit in that commuter sweet spot where they'll keep pace with brisk bicycle traffic without trying to rip your arms off. On flat ground they feel remarkably similar in outright pace: you twist your thumb, they both build speed to a sensible top end that feels fast enough for the city but won't get you a starring role in a viral crash compilation.
The difference is how they get there. The LEVY's front motor feels a bit more eager off the line, especially in its sportiest mode. It pulls you forward with a smooth but noticeable surge that makes short gaps at traffic lights easy to exploit. Cruise control takes the strain off your thumb on longer straights, which is one of those "once you have it, you miss it everywhere else" features.
The C35's rear motor is tuned more gently. Acceleration is predictable and friendly, ideal if you're coming from a non-powered scooter or you're slightly nervous about electric torque. The rear-drive setup does give good traction, especially on slightly loose surfaces, but you won't mistake it for a little hot-rod. On hills, both start to feel honest about their limits: gentle slopes are fine, steeper ramps will slow them down noticeably, and true city mountain stages will have you contributing some kick-assist or patience. The LEVY's higher peak output helps on short climbs, but neither is a hill-climber at heart.
Braking is a clearer win for the LEVY. Having a proper rear disc plus electronic front braking gives more bite and modulation, and you can scrub speed decisively without theatrics. The C35's combination of electronic braking and a foot-operated fender is functional and has the virtue of mechanical redundancy, but it never quite feels as composed when you really need to stop in a hurry.
Battery & Range
On the spec sheet, the RAZOR C35 claims more distance from a charge. In reality, if you ride it like a normal human in its quicker mode, the range feels comfortably enough for typical short-to-medium commutes - think one return trip across town if you're not hammering it everywhere. You do, however, start to watch the battery gauge if your daily loop pushes into the longer teens of kilometres, especially in colder weather.
The LEVY, by contrast, is very upfront about offering a modest single-battery range. Ride in the frugal mode and you can get close to the official figure; ride flat out and the bar graph drains faster than you'd like. On its own, that would be a deal-breaker for many. But the swappable battery turns the whole equation on its head: a second, bottle-weight pack in your bag basically doubles your day without making the scooter itself any heavier.
Charging habits are also very different. The C35 is a classic "plug it in where it lives" scooter, taking the better part of a workday or a night to go from empty to full. You position your life around its parking spot and a nearby socket. With the LEVY, you take the battery to the socket instead. A shorter charging time and the ability to top up on your desk or kitchen counter make it painless to start each ride full. In practice, LEVY's modular approach beats the C35's bigger-but-fixed pack for most urban riders who don't have a garage with wall sockets.
Portability & Practicality
This is where the gap really opens up. Carrying the LEVY Original up a short flight of stairs or chucking it into a car boot is genuinely manageable. It folds quickly into a compact, tidy package that you can lift one-handed if you're reasonably fit. On trains or trams it behaves like slightly awkward luggage rather than an unwieldy object everyone glares at.
The RAZOR C35, while not a monster, definitely feels a class heavier and bulkier. The huge front wheel and fixed-width handlebars make it longer and more awkward when folded. You can carry it up stairs, but you wouldn't volunteer to do so repeatedly. In crowded public transport, it's a bit of a space hog, and the non-folding bars can earn you some dirty looks during rush hour.
Practicality off the scooter matters too. The LEVY lets you lock the chassis outside and take only the battery indoors, which is a huge quality-of-life win if your office or building managers have Opinions about wheeled objects inside. It also acts as a nice theft deterrent. With the C35, the whole package comes with you if you need to charge or secure it somewhere you trust. For ground-floor living with a hallway plug, that's fine. For fifth-floor walk-ups, it gets old very fast.
Safety
Both scooters tick the basics: front and rear lights, pneumatic tyres, and sensible top speeds. The RAZOR adds peace of mind with a certified electrical system, which is not something to gloss over if the scooter lives inside your flat. The big front wheel also contributes a very real safety benefit by dramatically reducing how easily the front end gets snagged by holes and edges.
The LEVY counters with a more sophisticated braking package and balanced tyre sizing. In day-to-day city traffic, being able to scrub speed confidently with a proper rear disc often matters more than one extra safety stamp on a datasheet. The lighting on both is fine for being seen in well-lit urban environments; neither is a dedicated night-rider's dream, but you won't feel invisible.
Grip and stability are solid on both, with the LEVY's matching tyres feeling predictable in corners and the C35's chubby front contact patch smoothing sketchier surfaces. In heavy rain and serious puddles, I wouldn't push either - they are "caught in a drizzle" machines, not "storm chaser" rigs.
Community Feedback
| RAZOR C35 | LEVY Original |
|---|---|
| What riders love Big front wheel comfort; stable feel; tough steel frame; generous deck; simple, no-nonsense operation; perceived value when discounted. |
What riders love Swappable battery convenience; light weight; smooth ride on air tyres; strong brakes; clean design; responsive customer support; easy DIY repairs. |
| What riders complain about Confusion between lead-acid and lithium versions; weight of the older variant; no real suspension; mediocre hill climbing; basic display; slow charging; fixed bar height. |
What riders complain about Short range per battery; slightly bulky stem for accessories; limited hill performance for heavier riders; cosmetic wear on paint; basic kickstand; rear fender feeling a bit cheap. |
Price & Value
On sticker price alone, the RAZOR C35 undercuts the LEVY Original. For riders whose budget is firm and unforgiving, the C35 is tempting: you get a recognisable brand, a big front tyre, and a properly engineered frame at a price many "alphabet soup" imports struggle to match.
The LEVY asks for more up front, and then politely suggests you might want to buy a spare battery as well. Once you factor that in, it's not the cheap date in this comparison. Where it redeems itself is in how those euros translate into daily convenience and long-term ownership: being able to replace only the battery in a few years, charge it anywhere, and actually get spare parts without a pilgrimage to obscure online marketplaces. If you cost your time and sanity, the LEVY's higher ticket makes more sense than it first appears.
Still, if you're extremely price-sensitive and your use case is short, predictable trips on rougher surfaces, the C35 delivers honest functionality for the money. Just make sure you're buying the lithium version, or the value proposition evaporates quickly.
Service & Parts Availability
RAZOR is a very established name with a wide distribution network. That usually translates into decent availability of basic parts and a clear warranty process, especially for mainstream markets. You're unlikely to be left with a completely orphaned scooter if something routine breaks, although you may not find every little component as easily as with the modder-favourite brands.
LEVY's whole brand story leans into serviceability. They actively sell batteries, tyres, fenders, throttles - the bits that actually wear - and provide guidance on how to swap them yourself. For riders in Europe, shipping times and support hours matter, but the intention is clearly to keep scooters on the road, not in landfill. That approach is more rare than it should be in this price bracket.
If you like the idea of treating your scooter like a maintainable vehicle rather than a disposable gadget, the LEVY's ecosystem feels more encouraging, even if RAZOR's global footprint is technically larger.
Pros & Cons Summary
| RAZOR C35 | LEVY Original | |
|---|---|---|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | RAZOR C35 (Li-ion) | LEVY Original |
|---|---|---|
| Motor power (rated) | 350 W (rear hub) | 350 W (front hub) |
| Top speed | ca. 29 km/h | ca. 29 km/h |
| Claimed range | ca. 29 km | ca. 16 km per battery |
| Battery | 37 V, 5,0 Ah (185 Wh) | 36 V, 6,4 Ah (230 Wh) |
| Weight | 14,6 kg | 12,3 kg |
| Brakes | Rear electronic + rear fender | Front e-ABS + rear disc + fender |
| Suspension | None (pneumatic tyres only) | None (pneumatic tyres only) |
| Tyres | Front 12,5" pneumatic, rear 8,5" pneumatic | 10" pneumatic (front and rear) |
| Max load | 100 kg | ca. 125 kg |
| IP rating | n/a specified | IP54 |
| Approx. price | 378 € | 472 € |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
If your daily reality is battered tarmac, lazy road maintenance and the occasional unmarked trench, the RAZOR C35's big-wheel front end and stout frame make a lot of sense. It feels reassuringly solid, shrugs off rough surfaces and will happily do short-to-medium commutes at a steady, sensible pace. You tolerate its weight and basic features in return for that tank-like stability.
If, however, you're juggling stairs, trains, office rules and limited storage, the LEVY Original is simply the more intelligent tool. It's light enough to carry without swearing, its folding and form factor make multi-modal trips painless, and the removable battery completely changes how easy it is to live with. Add in stronger brakes and good support, and it feels less like a compromise and more like a smartly designed urban appliance.
For most modern city riders who aren't dealing with truly awful roads, the LEVY Original is the better long-term partner. The RAZOR C35 has its niche and does what it does decently, but the LEVY is the scooter you're more likely to still enjoy using after the novelty wears off.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | RAZOR C35 | LEVY Original |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ✅ 2,04 €/Wh | ❌ 2,05 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ✅ 13,03 €/km/h | ❌ 16,28 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ❌ 79,05 g/Wh | ✅ 53,26 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | ❌ 0,50 kg/km/h | ✅ 0,42 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ✅ 18,90 €/km | ❌ 33,71 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ✅ 0,73 kg/km | ❌ 0,88 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ✅ 9,25 Wh/km | ❌ 16,43 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ✅ 12,07 W/(km/h) | ✅ 12,07 W/(km/h) |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | Weight to power ratio (kg/W)✅ 0,04 kg/W | ✅ 0,04 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ❌ 23,13 W | ✅ 76,67 W |
These metrics look purely at maths: how much you pay and carry for each unit of energy, speed or distance, plus how fast you can get energy back into the battery. Efficiency (Wh/km) shows how gently a scooter sips power; price-per-unit figures reveal financial efficiency; weight-per-unit figures show portability versus capability; and the charging speed indicates how quickly you can turn a wall socket into real-world riding time.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | RAZOR C35 | LEVY Original |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ❌ Noticeably heavier to lug | ✅ Light, easy to carry |
| Range | ✅ Longer per full charge | ❌ Shorter on single battery |
| Max Speed | ✅ Matches commuter sweet spot | ✅ Same real-world top end |
| Power | ❌ Feels modest, soft pull | ✅ Punchier, livelier response |
| Battery Size | ❌ Smaller, fixed capacity | ✅ Bigger, modular pack |
| Suspension | ✅ Big front wheel comfort | ❌ Tyres only, no extra help |
| Design | ❌ Chunky, slightly dated look | ✅ Clean, modern, minimalist |
| Safety | ❌ Weaker braking, basic setup | ✅ Strong brakes, good manners |
| Practicality | ❌ Bulky, awkward indoors | ✅ Portable, office-friendly |
| Comfort | ✅ Big wheel smooths rough city | ❌ Less forgiving on bad roads |
| Features | ❌ Very basic, barebones | ✅ Modes, cruise, swappable pack |
| Serviceability | ❌ Less modular, fewer options | ✅ Built to be repairable |
| Customer Support | ❌ Big brand, less personal | ✅ Responsive, rider-oriented team |
| Fun Factor | ❌ Competent but a bit dull | ✅ Nippy, playful in city |
| Build Quality | ✅ Sturdy, tank-like frame | ❌ Good, but less overbuilt |
| Component Quality | ❌ Functional, nothing special | ✅ Brakes, tyres feel higher tier |
| Brand Name | ✅ Widely known, long history | ❌ Newer, more niche brand |
| Community | ✅ Large, mainstream presence | ❌ Smaller but dedicated base |
| Lights (visibility) | ❌ Basic, get-you-by level | ✅ Slightly better integration |
| Lights (illumination) | ❌ Adequate only for lit streets | ✅ Marginally stronger, focused |
| Acceleration | ❌ Gentle, unexciting launches | ✅ Sharper off-the-line feel |
| Arrive with smile factor | ❌ Feels like transport appliance | ✅ More grin per kilometre |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ✅ Calm, planted, unfussy | ❌ Needs more road attention |
| Charging speed | ❌ Slow, overnight mindset | ✅ Quick top-ups, flexible |
| Reliability | ✅ Simple, robust engineering | ✅ Solid, fleet-inspired design |
| Folded practicality | ❌ Long, wide, awkward shape | ✅ Compact, easy to stash |
| Ease of transport | ❌ Heavy on stairs, transit | ✅ Comfortable for daily carrying |
| Handling | ❌ Stable but a bit sluggish | ✅ Agile, flickable in traffic |
| Braking performance | ❌ Fender-dependent in emergencies | ✅ Strong, controllable stopping |
| Riding position | ✅ Spacious, natural stance | ❌ Deck smaller, less room |
| Handlebar quality | ❌ Fixed, slightly basic feel | ✅ Feels more refined |
| Throttle response | ❌ Softer, slightly lazier | ✅ Crisp, predictable output |
| Dashboard/Display | ❌ Simple, hard in strong sun | ✅ Clearer, better integrated |
| Security (locking) | ❌ Whole scooter must be moved | ✅ Remove battery, lock frame |
| Weather protection | ❌ Less explicit ingress rating | ✅ IP54, drizzle-friendly |
| Resale value | ❌ Toy-brand stigma hurts value | ✅ Niche but desirable feature |
| Tuning potential | ❌ Limited modding ecosystem | ❌ Not really mod-oriented |
| Ease of maintenance | ❌ Less modular, more hassle | ✅ Designed for DIY upkeep |
| Value for Money | ✅ Cheap entry, good basics | ❌ Costs more for full benefit |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the RAZOR C35 scores 7 points against the LEVY Original's 5. In the Author's Category Battle, the RAZOR C35 gets 11 ✅ versus 29 ✅ for LEVY Original.
Totals: RAZOR C35 scores 18, LEVY Original scores 34.
Based on the scoring, the LEVY Original is our overall winner. For me, the LEVY Original feels like the scooter that understands how people actually live with these things: it's light, eager, easy to charge and simple to fix, so you end up using it more and worrying about it less. The RAZOR C35 does a respectable job as a tough, comfy city mule, but it never quite escapes the feeling of being a slightly old-school tool that you work around rather than one that works around you. If you want a scooter that quietly slips into your routine and still manages to be fun on the way home, the LEVY is the one that's more likely to keep you reaching for the handlebars day after day.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.

