Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
If you just want the better all-round commuter and don't overthink the budget, the Xiaomi Pro 2 is the more complete scooter: longer real-world range, stronger hill performance, better brakes, smarter features, and an ecosystem that makes ownership almost boringly easy. It's the "default" for a reason.
The Razor C35, on the other hand, fights back with that huge front wheel and rugged steel frame, delivering a noticeably calmer, more confidence-inspiring ride on bad city surfaces - especially if you're new to scooters or hate tiny nervous wheels. It suits shorter commutes, flatter cities, and riders who value stability and simplicity over apps and bells and whistles.
If your priority is range, practicality and proven day-in, day-out usefulness, lean Xiaomi. If you want maximum stability per euro and don't ride that far, the Razor is a quietly sensible alternative. Now, let's dig into what really separates these two - because the spec sheets only tell half the story.
Electric scooters in this price band are no longer toys; they're everyday vehicles that get abused on cracked pavements, shunted into lifts, and dragged up stairwells. I've ridden both the Razor C35 and the Xiaomi Pro 2 in exactly those conditions - rain, cobbles, angry buses behind me - and they're far closer in "class" than their reputations suggest.
On the street, the Xiaomi Pro 2 feels like the default choice: predictable, efficient, and just clever enough without trying to be your smartphone on wheels. The Razor C35 is more of a blue-collar commuter with one big party trick - that oversized front wheel - and a very no-nonsense attitude to getting you across hostile urban tarmac.
If you're wondering which one will actually make your commute less annoying, keep reading - because they win in very different ways.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
Both of these scooters sit in the same broad "serious but not crazy" commuter class. They're light enough to carry for a bit, fast enough to keep pace in bike lanes, and priced where normal people actually buy them rather than just drooling over YouTube reviews.
The Xiaomi Pro 2 is the textbook urban commuter: moderate top speed, good range for a workday there-and-back, and a huge community behind it. Think of it as the sensible hatchback of scooters - not exciting, but very hard to argue with.
The Razor C35 is priced much lower, but not so low that it's disposable junk. It's a budget-minded commuter that spends its limited "spec points" on structural solidity and a large front tyre to deal with real-world streets. It doesn't try to match the Xiaomi on tech or battery size; it tries to undercut it on price while still feeling like a grown-up vehicle.
They compete because, if you're shopping for your first proper scooter and don't want a no-name Amazon lottery, these two end up on the same shortlist: brand you actually recognise, still just about affordable, and aimed at everyday city riders rather than thrill-seekers.
Design & Build Quality
In the hand, they feel like they come from completely different design meetings.
The Xiaomi Pro 2 is classic minimalist aluminium: clean welds, tidy cable routing, matte finish with small red highlights. It looks like it belongs in a tech store next to laptops, not in a toy aisle. The folding hinge is neat and fast, and the whole package feels reasonably refined, even if you know some of its weak spots (that hinge does loosen with time if you neglect it).
The Razor C35 is more "industrial chic" than industrial design. Heavy steel frame, chunky welds, and that comically large front wheel give it a utilitarian, almost rental-fleet vibe. It doesn't look sleek, but it does look like you could bounce it off a few kerbs without it bursting into tears. There's less plastic trim, more bare metal. The folding system is simple and solid, though not as slick as Xiaomi's three-second party trick.
In build feel, the Xiaomi is more polished; the Razor feels more overbuilt. The C35's deck is long and spacious with thick rubber grip - your feet get more real estate than on the Xiaomi - but some details (exposed wiring at the neck, basic display) remind you where the cost has been saved. The Pro 2's dashboard and internal cabling feel more "finished" and modern.
So: Xiaomi wins on perceived quality and design finesse; Razor counters with a frame that feels like it expects to be abused.
Ride Comfort & Handling
This is where the comparison gets interesting, because the spec sheets do not prepare you for how different they feel.
On the Xiaomi Pro 2, comfort lives and dies by those modest-sized pneumatic tyres. On fresh tarmac or decent bike paths, it's pleasantly smooth - you can cruise at full speed, shoulders relaxed, barely noticing seams in the asphalt. The geometry is neutral, the steering predictable. But as soon as you hit rough pavements, patched-up tarmac, or cobbles, the lack of suspension shows. After several kilometres of bumpy city sidewalks, your hands and feet will absolutely know about it, and your knees become your main suspension components.
The Razor C35 approaches the same roads with a completely different weapon: that huge front tyre. The moment you roll off a kerb ramp or across a cracked paving slab, you feel the difference. The big front wheel simply steamrollers over stuff that makes the Xiaomi hesitate. You still don't have actual suspension, but the extra tyre volume at the front soaks up a surprising amount of chatter. The rear, with its smaller tyre and motor weight, is much more honest - you'll still feel sharp hits through your heels - but the overall ride is calmer and less twitchy on bad surfaces.
In tight handling, the Xiaomi feels lighter on its feet and a bit more agile. Swerving around pedestrians and threading gaps in traffic feels natural, if slightly nervous on poor surfaces. The Razor is more planted and slower to tip in; you trade a bit of nimbleness for a stronger sense of stability, especially at the front end.
If your city has half-decent bike infrastructure, the Xiaomi's comfort is acceptable if not inspiring. If your commute looks like a war between tree roots and paving contractors, the Razor's big front wheel makes a surprisingly strong case for itself.
Performance
Neither of these scooters is going to rip your arms off - and that's fine for their intended purpose. But they take different routes to "enough performance".
The Xiaomi Pro 2 uses a front-hub motor that, on paper, doesn't sound dramatic, but in practice gives a crisp, eager pull up to its governed top speed. Acceleration off the line in its sportiest mode is pleasantly brisk up to around cycling pace; you're not dropping e-bikes, but you're not holding up the lane either. The power delivery is smooth and predictable, making it easy for new riders to feel in control, yet just lively enough not to feel sluggish.
The Razor C35's rear-hub motor sits in the same general performance bracket, but you feel it differently. Rear-wheel drive means when you thumb the throttle, the scooter pushes rather than pulls, which feels more natural when your weight shifts backwards. Off the line it's competent rather than exciting, building speed steadily rather than snapping to attention. You do feel the motor running out of puff sooner on hills compared with the Xiaomi, especially with heavier riders - on steep ramps, the C35 begins to feel like it's politely asking for a bit of kick-assist.
At top speed, the Xiaomi feels slightly more effortless; it sits at its legal cap with a bit more headroom on gentle inclines. The Razor will get close to its claim on the flat, but it feels like it's working harder to stay there. Neither feels unstable at full chat, but the Razor's bigger front wheel gives more psychological confidence when the surface turns nasty, while the Xiaomi feels more in its element on smoother paths.
Braking is where the Xiaomi pulls clearly ahead. Its combination of front electronic braking and rear mechanical disc gives you strong, controllable deceleration with a proper lever feel. You can brake late into junctions without puckering too much, provided you respect the limits of small tyres.
The Razor C35's brakes are... pragmatic. You have a rear electronic brake on the lever and a good old-fashioned stomp-on-the-fender mechanical brake. It works, and the redundancy is nice from a safety perspective, but it's neither as refined nor as confidence-inspiring as a proper disc system. Hard stops feel more dramatic and require more rider technique.
Battery & Range
This is the big dividing line between the two.
The Xiaomi Pro 2 packs a generous battery for its weight. In the real world, riding in the faster modes with a typical adult on board, you can expect it to cover a medium urban commute and still have a comfortable buffer. Doing a one-way trek of well over a dozen kilometres is no drama; a return journey of similar length is possible if you ride with a bit of restraint. Range anxiety is there if you hammer it all the time, but for most riders it's more "keep half an eye on the gauge" than "start praying at halfway".
The Razor C35's lithium version is much more modest. Used enthusiastically in its sport setting, it's realistically a short-to-medium hop machine. It will handle a typical city commute of several kilometres each way, but if your daily round trip starts pushing towards the upper teens, you'll want a charger at the office or a habit of plugging in at every opportunity. Push it hard with a heavier rider and some hills, and the gauge drops at a pace you become very aware of.
Both scooters take the better part of a workday or a night's sleep to recharge from empty. Neither does fast charging, and at this battery size that's not a tragedy - but given how much more battery you get in the Xiaomi, the similar charge time feels like a win for the Pro 2.
In simple terms: if your riding pattern is lots of short errands and a relatively compact daily loop, the Razor's small tank is tolerable. If you want the freedom to roam a bit, or you don't fancy living by a charging schedule, the Xiaomi's extra capacity makes life noticeably easier.
Portability & Practicality
On paper, they're almost the same weight; in reality, how that weight is packaged matters more.
The Xiaomi Pro 2 folds into a compact, fairly flat bundle. The stem latches to the rear mudguard with the bell hook, creating a reasonably well-balanced carry. Hauling it up one or two flights of stairs is doable without needing a lie-down at the top. It slides under most desks, fits neatly into small car boots, and is just about manageable in busy trains if you hold it upright and apologise a lot.
The Razor C35 is similar in heft but bulkier in shape thanks to that big front wheel and non-folding bars. Folded, it's a taller, more awkward package. Carrying it for any distance feels more ungainly; you find yourself wrestling the front wheel around doorframes more often than you'd like. It's fine for the odd staircase or lifting into a car, but if "sling it over your shoulder at the station every day" is your plan, you'll feel the difference.
Day-to-day practicality also leans Xiaomi's way. The Pro 2's deck-mounted hook, app-based motor lock, and ubiquitous spare-parts ecosystem make ownership simple. The Razor counters with a solid steel kickstand and a frame that shrugs off cosmetic knocks, but lacks the little quality-of-life touches - no app, no electronic lock, and parts availability is decent but nowhere near Xiaomi's "every corner shop has something" level.
Safety
Both scooters get the basics right, but with different emphasis.
The Xiaomi Pro 2's safety game is centred on control and visibility. The dual-brake system with ABS-like electronic front braking and rear mechanical disc provides strong, predictable stopping. The upgraded headlight throws a usable beam far enough ahead for real night commuting, and the bright, reacting brake light plus side reflectors do a decent job of making you visible in traffic. On dry roads, the combination of pneumatic tyres and balanced chassis inspires reasonable confidence.
The Razor C35 leans harder into passive, mechanical safety. That oversized front tyre dramatically reduces the chance of a nasty surprise from a pothole or a raised paving slab - exactly the kind of thing that sends small-wheeled scooters flying. For newer riders or those in badly maintained cities, that matters. The braking setup is more basic, but having an old-school fender brake as a back-up if electronics misbehave is reassuringly low-tech. Razor also brings UL-certified electrics to the table, which is a quiet but important point if you park the thing inside your flat.
Lighting on the Razor is serviceable rather than impressive: you get a headlight and a reactive brake light, but they don't feel as thoroughly thought-through as Xiaomi's system. The C35's overall stability on rough surfaces is its main safety ace; Xiaomi's better braking and lighting are its own.
Community Feedback
| Razor C35 | Xiaomi Pro 2 |
|---|---|
What riders love
|
What riders love
|
What riders complain about
|
What riders complain about
|
Price & Value
Here's where the Razor C35 makes its most convincing argument: it costs dramatically less. You're paying entry-ish money for a scooter that, in some key ways, behaves like a mid-range commuter - particularly in ride comfort on bad roads and basic structural robustness. If your budget is tight, the C35 doesn't feel like a toy; it feels like a stripped-back, slightly rough-edged tool.
The Xiaomi Pro 2 asks for a chunky premium over the Razor. In return, you get a larger battery, better braking hardware, stronger range, better lighting, app features, and a parts ecosystem that significantly reduces long-term hassle. Whether that's "worth it" depends how long you plan to keep the scooter and how far you ride. Over a couple of years of daily commuting, the extra outlay starts to look more like an investment in convenience and fewer compromises.
In purely short-term budget terms, Razor wins. In whole-life value, especially for heavier users or longer commutes, the Xiaomi justifies its price, even if it doesn't feel like a screaming bargain.
Service & Parts Availability
This one is almost unfair.
The Xiaomi Pro 2 enjoys an aftermarket ecosystem most scooter brands can only dream of. Need a new mudguard, brake disc, folding latch, or a completely new stem? There are multiple third-party options, YouTube tutorials, local repair shops that know the model inside out, and community forums that have already solved whatever problem you're having. It's like owning a very common car: someone has already broken, fixed, and upgraded every part of it.
Razor is a known brand with formal distribution and support, which is already a step above random white-label scooters. Official spares are reasonably available, and the C35's simple construction means many bike shops can improvise fixes. But the sheer volume of Pro 2s on European streets means Xiaomi wins hands-down for DIY support, modding options, and cheap replacement parts.
Pros & Cons Summary
| Razor C35 | Xiaomi Pro 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | Razor C35 | Xiaomi Pro 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Motor power (rated) | 350 W rear hub | 300 W front hub |
| Top speed | ca. 29 km/h | 25 km/h (capped) |
| Battery energy | 185 Wh | ca. 446 Wh |
| Advertised range | 29 km | 45 km |
| Typical real-world range | ca. 18-22 km | ca. 25-35 km |
| Weight | 14,63 kg | 14,2 kg |
| Brakes | Rear electronic + rear fender | Front E-ABS + rear disc |
| Suspension | None (pneumatic tyres only) | None (pneumatic tyres only) |
| Wheel / tyre size | Front 12,5", rear 8,5", pneumatic | 8,5" front & rear, pneumatic |
| Max load | 100 kg | 100 kg |
| Ingress protection | Not specified | IP54 |
| Typical street price | 378 € | 642 € |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
If I had to sum it up in one line: the Xiaomi Pro 2 is the better all-round scooter, but the Razor C35 is better than you think - as long as your expectations match its hardware.
For most riders with a normal urban commute, the Pro 2 simply makes life easier. You get meaningful range, proper braking, decent lighting, a huge support ecosystem, and a ride that, while not plush, is competent on the surfaces it was designed for. It's the scooter you buy if you want to stop thinking about scooters and just get to work and back, day after day.
The Razor C35, by contrast, is a specialist hiding in budget clothing. If your daily route is short, the roads are grim, and you value stability and a tough frame more than range and smart features, that big front wheel starts to look like money well spent. It's also friendlier for cautious beginners who find small-wheeled scooters a bit twitchy and unnerving.
So: if your commute regularly pushes beyond ten kilometres, involves hills, or you plan to rely on the scooter as your primary transport, stretch to the Xiaomi Pro 2. If you ride shorter distances on rough streets and your wallet firmly disagrees with Xiaomi's price tag, the Razor C35 is a sensible, if slightly bare-bones, way into grown-up scootering.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | Razor C35 | Xiaomi Pro 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ❌ 2,04 €/Wh | ✅ 1,44 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ✅ 13,03 €/km/h | ❌ 25,68 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ❌ 79,05 g/Wh | ✅ 31,84 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | ✅ 0,50 kg/km/h | ❌ 0,57 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ✅ 18,90 €/km | ❌ 21,40 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ❌ 0,73 kg/km | ✅ 0,47 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ✅ 9,25 Wh/km | ❌ 14,87 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ✅ 12,07 W/(km/h) | ❌ 12,00 W/(km/h) |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | ✅ 0,0418 kg/W | ❌ 0,0473 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ❌ 23,13 W | ✅ 55,75 W |
These metrics look purely at maths, not feel. Price-per-Wh and price-per-km/h show how much you pay for battery and speed. Weight-based metrics reveal how much scooter you haul per unit of performance or range. Wh per km reflects energy efficiency: how gently each scooter sips its battery. Power-to-speed and weight-to-power give a sense of how "stressed" the motor is. Average charging speed tells you how fast each pack refills, regardless of charger branding.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | Razor C35 | Xiaomi Pro 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ❌ Slightly heavier feel | ✅ Marginally lighter, better balance |
| Range | ❌ Short daily radius | ✅ Comfortable commuter distance |
| Max Speed | ✅ Tiny edge on top | ❌ Slower but compliant |
| Power | ❌ Runs out on climbs | ✅ Stronger real-world pull |
| Battery Size | ❌ Very small pack | ✅ Much larger capacity |
| Suspension | ❌ Tyres only, harsh rear | ❌ Tyres only, harsh overall |
| Design | ❌ Functional, a bit crude | ✅ Clean, modern, award-winning |
| Safety | ❌ Basic brakes, OK lights | ✅ Better brakes, visibility |
| Practicality | ❌ Bulky folded package | ✅ Easier to live with |
| Comfort | ✅ Big front wheel helps | ❌ Harsher on rough stuff |
| Features | ❌ No smart anything | ✅ App, cruise, lock, BMS |
| Serviceability | ❌ Fewer guides, less ecosystem | ✅ Huge DIY support base |
| Customer Support | ✅ Straightforward brand support | ❌ Depends heavily on reseller |
| Fun Factor | ✅ Big-wheel, relaxed cruise | ❌ Competent, slightly sensible |
| Build Quality | ✅ Tank-like steel chassis | ❌ Good, but hinge niggles |
| Component Quality | ❌ Basic brakes, simple cockpit | ✅ Better brakes, cockpit |
| Brand Name | ❌ More toy-brand image | ✅ Established commuter standard |
| Community | ❌ Smaller, quieter community | ✅ Massive active community |
| Lights (visibility) | ❌ Adequate but basic | ✅ Brighter, more refined |
| Lights (illumination) | ❌ OK for being seen | ✅ Better road coverage |
| Acceleration | ❌ Adequate, nothing more | ✅ Zippier to city speeds |
| Arrive with smile factor | ✅ Big-wheel chill vibes | ❌ Efficient, slightly bland |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ✅ Stable on rough surfaces | ❌ Harsher, more fatigue |
| Charging speed | ❌ Slow for small pack | ✅ More Wh per hour |
| Reliability | ✅ Simple, few complex parts | ✅ Proven long-term survivor |
| Folded practicality | ❌ Tall, awkward shape | ✅ Compact, easy to stash |
| Ease of transport | ❌ Awkward to carry | ✅ Better balance, hook |
| Handling | ✅ Stable, forgiving geometry | ❌ Nimbler but twitchier |
| Braking performance | ❌ Fender plus regen only | ✅ Disc + E-ABS combo |
| Riding position | ✅ Spacious deck, natural | ❌ Narrower deck, standard |
| Handlebar quality | ❌ Basic, non-adjustable feel | ✅ Better grips, cockpit |
| Throttle response | ❌ More sedate, less crisp | ✅ Smooth, more immediate |
| Dashboard / Display | ❌ Very simple, limited info | ✅ Clear, app-enhanced data |
| Security (locking) | ❌ Physical lock only | ✅ Motor lock via app |
| Weather protection | ❌ No clear IP rating | ✅ IP54, better sealed |
| Resale value | ❌ Less demand used | ✅ Sells easily, holds value |
| Tuning potential | ❌ Little mod scene | ✅ Huge tuning ecosystem |
| Ease of maintenance | ✅ Simple, sturdy construction | ❌ Tyres, hinge more fiddly |
| Value for Money | ✅ Strong for low price | ❌ Good, but not cheap |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the RAZOR C35 scores 6 points against the XIAOMI Pro 2's 4. In the Author's Category Battle, the RAZOR C35 gets 12 ✅ versus 27 ✅ for XIAOMI Pro 2.
Totals: RAZOR C35 scores 18, XIAOMI Pro 2 scores 31.
Based on the scoring, the XIAOMI Pro 2 is our overall winner. Between these two, the Xiaomi Pro 2 feels like the more rounded partner for everyday life: it goes further, stops harder, fits better into crowded city routines and generally asks fewer awkward questions of your planning. The Razor C35 has its charms - especially that calming big-wheel ride - but you're always aware of its limits when the journey gets longer or steeper. If you want a scooter that quietly does the job and won't box you in as your routes evolve, the Xiaomi is the one that will keep you content the longest. The Razor remains a likeable, rugged shortcut into electric commuting, but it's the Pro 2 that feels like the safer long-term bet for most riders.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.

