Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
The RAZOR Raven is the better overall scooter here: it's faster, goes noticeably further, rides less harshly, and is actually usable by lightweight adults as well as teens. The Power Core XLR90 is cheaper and fine as a pure toy, but its ancient battery tech, bone-hard ride and short play time keep it firmly in "backyard fun" territory.
Pick the Raven if you want a genuinely practical light-duty runabout for a teenager or smaller adult that can handle short commutes, campus hops and neighbourhood errands. Pick the XLR90 only if you're shopping for a younger child who'll use it purely for play on smooth pavement and you don't mind overnight charging after every session.
Both can be fun, but only one behaves like a small vehicle rather than a noisy toy-read on to see where each shines and where the compromises get a bit hard to ignore.
If you've followed Razor since the ankle-smashing kick scooter days, you already know the brand can build something tough enough to survive kids. The question in 2025 isn't "will it last?", it's "is this still good value when the market has moved on this far?"
On paper, the RAZOR Raven and the Power Core XLR90 don't look that far apart: small motors, modest speeds, steel frames and the unmistakable Razor DNA. In practice, they live in different worlds. One is a lightweight, semi-practical teen/college scooter trying to pretend it's all grown up; the other is an unapologetic children's toy powered by yesterday's battery chemistry.
If you're a parent, or a rider shopping for a younger sibling, this is exactly the kind of choice that decides whether the scooter becomes a daily companion or ends up dusty behind the lawnmower. Let's dig into what both actually feel like on the road-and which compromises you're really signing up for.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
The Raven is pitched squarely at teenagers and lighter adults: think school runs, campus shortcuts and quick neighbourhood missions. It nudges into "real transport" territory, just without the scary speeds or commuter-scooter heft.
The Power Core XLR90, by contrast, is very clearly a kids' product. Its ideal rider is in primary school, small, fearless, and not yet allowed near anything with a lithium battery and a proper brake lever.
So why compare them? Because in the real world, parents and relatives often stare at the same brand shelf (or the same web page) and wonder whether to "stretch" to the more serious Raven or save money with the XLR90. Both carry the same Razor badge, share a similar simple layout, and promise "up to about an hour" of fun. Only one, however, realistically doubles as transport.
In short: Raven competes with beginner commuter scooters at the very bottom of the price ladder, the XLR90 with other electric toys. If your rider is anywhere near teen size, they're not in the same league-even if the styling might convince you otherwise.
Design & Build Quality
Both scooters are unapologetically steel-framed, and both feel reassuringly solid in the hand-no toy-store flex when you twist the bars. The Raven adds a properly adult-looking black finish, a taller stem and a deck that doesn't scream "birthday present from grandma". On the street, it blends in with budget commuter scooters rather than kids' rides.
The XLR90 goes the opposite way: bright colours, visible plastic deck, and that classic Razor urethane front wheel that instantly tells any adult, "this is not for you". It's robust in the way a BMX is robust-you know it'll survive being dropped in the driveway a hundred times-but you also know corners have been cut where grown-up scooters have moved on.
In the hands, the Raven's folding stem feels surprisingly tight for the price. There's always a little suspicion with cheap fold mechanisms, but this one locked up without annoying play and never tried to collapse under hard braking. The XLR90 simply doesn't fold at all: one solid T-bar bolted into the deck. That's great for rigidity and kid abuse, less great when you're negotiating a boot full of shopping.
Component quality follows the same script. The Raven mixes steel structure with a decent 3D-textured deck surface and simple but functional cockpit display. The XLR90's grips and plastics are clearly chosen with cost in mind: perfectly adequate for a child, but you're not getting any pleasant surprises.
Ride Comfort & Handling
If you ride both back-to-back on a patchy city pavement, the difference is frankly comical. The Raven's big air-filled front tyre and steel frame soak up the worst of the chatter before it gets to your hands. You still feel expansion joints and cracked slabs, but you're not counting fillings after 5 km. The solid rear wheel does kick your heels over sharp bumps, yet the front does enough work that it's more of a polite reminder than a punishment.
The XLR90, in contrast, gives you the full "hard-wheel nostalgia" package. Urethane front, solid rear, no suspension: on perfect tarmac it glides beautifully, on anything less it buzzes like an electric toothbrush on wheels. Kids tolerate that far better than adults, but once you've ridden the Raven, it's hard not to notice how much more primitive the XLR90 feels.
Handling-wise, the Raven has the longer wheelbase and larger front wheel that make it much more stable at its higher speeds. Leaning into corners feels natural, and the rear-hub drive pushes you through bends without drama. The bars are wide enough that you don't get that twitchy shopping-trolley feeling.
The XLR90 is much more "pointy". The small front wheel and short chassis make it extremely manoeuvrable at low speed-which kids love for tight driveway turns-but it can feel skittish if you push its modest top speed on rougher surfaces. Think agile, but not exactly confidence-inspiring if you've ridden anything serious before.
Performance
Let's be blunt: neither of these scooters is going to peel your eyelids back. But there is still a meaningful gap between them.
The Raven's rear hub motor has enough grunt that a teenager or light adult feels a proper push off the line. In Sport mode it creeps into that "I should probably wear a helmet and pretend to be sensible" speed range, especially on empty cycle paths. It won't pull you up serious hills without pedal-style help, but on the flat it's quick enough that you stop thinking of it as a toy and start thinking of routes.
The three riding modes on the Raven also matter more than the brochure suggests. Eco is sedate and stretches the range, Normal is fine for shared paths, and Sport gives you that extra liveliness you'll use 90 % of the time. Cruise control is the surprise hero here: on longer, straight sections you can give your thumb a rest and just steer, which makes it feel more "vehicle" than "plaything".
The XLR90's smaller motor is tuned for small riders and low drama. For a 25 kg child it feels brisk enough-there's a satisfying surge after you kick up to engagement speed, and it holds its modest top speed happily on flat ground. But the throttle is very much an on/off affair: younger kids cope, older ones notice the lack of finesse quickly.
Inclines expose the XLR90's limits immediately. Even mild hills will see speed droop and require kicking. The Raven isn't some climbing monster either, but it will at least tackle typical urban gradients with a teenager aboard without turning into a gym session.
Battery & Range
This is where the generational gap really shows. The Raven runs a lithium pack designed for short urban hops. In the real world, ridden enthusiastically in the fastest mode with a lightweight adult, you're looking at something like a medium suburban loop-think a handful of kilometres each way rather than a long cross-town slog. If you behave and cruise more gently, you can stretch it further, but it's no long-haul machine.
What matters is that the Raven's battery behaves like a modern device: power delivery stays fairly consistent until you're getting low, and charging is a "half a day and done" experience rather than "leave it on all night and hope". For school or campus duty where you can top up in between, it's workable; for a longer daily commute, it's marginal.
The XLR90's lead-acid pack feels like a time capsule. Fully charged, it'll give a child around two-thirds of an hour of zipping about on flat ground. That's fine for an afternoon play session, but once it starts to drain, you feel the scooter getting lazier underfoot. By the time you're thinking "one last lap", the motor is already telling you "not today".
And then you wait. Charging the XLR90 is very much a "plug it in after dinner, ride it tomorrow" ritual. No quick top-ups, no lunchtime rescue charge. From a parent's perspective it's predictable; from a kid's perspective, it's an eternity in the era of fast-charging everything else.
Portability & Practicality
At a bit over 12 kg and with a folding stem, the Raven sits in that "just about manageable" bracket. You won't love hauling it up four flights of stairs daily, but chucking it into a car boot or carrying it through a train station is realistic. Folded, it slides neatly under a desk or against a wall, which is exactly what you want on a campus or in a small flat.
The XLR90 is lighter on paper, but oddly less practical. The fixed stem means it occupies its full length no matter what you do; storing it in a small hallway quickly becomes a game of scooter Tetris. An adult can carry it easily, but most of the target riders can't comfortably lug it any distance once the battery dies. Yes, you can kick it manually, but between the rolling resistance of the hub motor and the extra mass from that lead-acid brick, it's not exactly an effortless push.
Weather-wise, neither is a rain specialist, but the Raven at least looks like it belongs outdoors daily. The larger front tyre deals better with wet patches and debris, and the general design feels closer to budget commuter scooters. The XLR90, with its slick urethane front wheel and open electronics heritage, is very much a fair-weather friend.
Safety
Both scooters get the important part right: they won't leap forward from a standstill the moment someone nudges the throttle. That kick-to-start behaviour is a genuine safety win, especially for small or inexperienced riders.
Braking is where the differences get serious. The Raven gives you an electronic brake operated from the handlebar plus the good old rear fender stomp. Used together they provide decent, controllable stopping power for its speeds. You're not doing emergency stops like a high-end disc system, but you don't feel helpless either.
The XLR90 sticks to a single rear fender brake. For kids transitioning from a normal Razor kick scooter, that's familiar and intuitive. For anything resembling an emergency stop from full speed, it's... optimistic. It works, but you're relying heavily on small feet and quick reactions. At least the motor cuts out when you brake, which helps avoid that unpleasant tug-of-war between power and friction.
Lighting is another clear divide. The Raven has an integrated headlight that's actually useful for being seen and seeing a bit of the path ahead at dusk. It's not a car headlamp, but it's more than the token glow many cheap scooters offer. The XLR90 has no built-in lights; it assumes "daylight only". If your child will be out later, you're into the world of clip-on LEDs and reflective jackets.
Stability-wise, the Raven's big front wheel and longer stance make it more forgiving over stray stones and cracks. The XLR90's tiny front wheel is just waiting to be offended by every pebble. At its lower speed that's acceptable, but it does keep you on your toes.
Community Feedback
| RAZOR Raven | RAZOR Power Core XLR90 |
|---|---|
What riders love
|
What riders love
|
What riders complain about
|
What riders complain about
|
Price & Value
Here's the awkward bit: the Raven costs well over twice as much as the XLR90. For a lot of families, that's the whole conversation. But value isn't the same as price.
For the extra outlay, the Raven gives you lithium power, a much more grown-up ride, real-world utility for older teens and lighter adults, and features-like cruise control and usable lighting-that nudge it into "transport" rather than just "toy". If it genuinely replaces some bus rides or car lifts, it can justify itself surprisingly quickly.
The XLR90, while undeniably cheap, feels its price in all the predictable places: old-school battery, basic controls, no folding, harsh ride. As a first electric scooter that might get ridden hard for a couple of seasons then handed down, it makes sense. Just be clear that you're buying pure fun with hard limits, not something that will comfortably grow with the rider into their teen years.
If your rider is already edging into teen height or you want something with even a whiff of commuting potential, stretching to the Raven-or frankly, considering the broader market-starts to look more sensible than doubling down on the toy grade.
Service & Parts Availability
The good news: they're both Razors. That means parts, chargers and support are generally easier to find than for the no-name clones cluttering up online marketplaces. In Europe, that usually translates into being able to order consumables like tyres, decks and chargers without resorting to obscure forums.
The Raven, being newer and built around lithium tech, is more in line with where Razor's broader electric line-up is heading. That bodes well for ongoing support. The XLR90 uses very established, very simple tech-lead-acid packs and basic controllers-so parts are cheap and generic, but long-term, we're talking more "toy service life" than "mini vehicle you maintain for a decade".
Neither is especially DIY-friendly beyond the basics, but if something does go wrong, you're not dealing with a completely unknown brand, which is half the battle in this segment.
Pros & Cons Summary
| RAZOR Raven | RAZOR Power Core XLR90 |
|---|---|
Pros
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
Cons
|
Parameters Comparison
| Specification | RAZOR Raven | RAZOR Power Core XLR90 |
|---|---|---|
| Motor power | 170 W rear hub | 90 W rear hub |
| Top speed | 19 km/h (Sport) | 16 km/h |
| Battery type / voltage | Lithium-ion, 21,6 V | Sealed lead-acid, 12 V |
| Battery capacity (estimated) | ~350 Wh | ~96 Wh |
| Claimed max range | 17 km | 9,6 km (estimated) |
| Realistic mixed-use range | 10-12 km | 7-8 km |
| Weight | 12,15 kg | 9,7 kg |
| Brakes | Electronic front (motor) + rear fender | Rear fender only |
| Suspension | None (large pneumatic front tyre) | None (solid tyres) |
| Tyres | Front 10" pneumatic, rear 6,7" solid | Front urethane, rear solid rubber |
| Max rider weight | 70 kg | 54 kg |
| IP rating | Not specified | Not specified |
| Charging time | ~4-6 h (est.) | ~12 h |
| Price (approx.) | 266 € | 110 € |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
If you strip away the branding nostalgia and the marketing fluff, the choice is cleaner than it first appears. The Raven is the only one of these two that behaves like a rudimentary transport tool. It's still very much entry-level and has its share of compromises, but it carries a teenager or lightweight adult at sensible urban speeds, folds, lights the way, and goes far enough that "popping to the shop" or skipping a bus ride is realistic.
The Power Core XLR90 is, quite unapologetically, a toy. A well-built, reasonably safe, decent-value toy-but a toy nonetheless. For an 8-year-old with a cul-de-sac and a patient parent to keep it charged, it'll deliver plenty of grins. For anyone older, heavier or hoping for something that can grow with them beyond primary school, its limits arrive quickly and loudly.
If your rider is under about twelve, light, and you just want an affordable way to let them taste electric riding on smooth local pavements, the XLR90 still makes a certain kind of sense. For almost every other scenario-teens, campus life, last-mile commuting for smaller adults-the Raven is the far more rational, and far less quickly outgrown, choice.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | RAZOR Raven | RAZOR Power Core XLR90 |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ✅ 0,76 €/Wh | ❌ 1,15 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ❌ 14,0 €/km/h | ✅ 6,9 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ✅ 34,7 g/Wh | ❌ 101,0 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | ❌ 0,64 kg/km/h | ✅ 0,61 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ❌ 24,2 €/km | ✅ 14,7 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ✅ 1,10 kg/km | ❌ 1,29 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ❌ 31,8 Wh/km | ✅ 12,8 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ✅ 8,95 W/km/h | ❌ 5,63 W/km/h |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | ✅ 0,071 kg/W | ❌ 0,108 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ✅ 70,0 W | ❌ 8,0 W |
These metrics strip things down to pure maths. They show how much battery and speed you get for your money, how heavy each scooter is relative to its energy and power, how efficiently they use their batteries, and how quickly they refill them. Remember, though, that this doesn't include comfort, safety features, or how enjoyable they are to live with day to day-it's just the cold, quantitative side of the story.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | RAZOR Raven | RAZOR Power Core XLR90 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ❌ Heavier to carry | ✅ Lighter for adults |
| Range | ✅ Longer useful range | ❌ Shorter play distance |
| Max Speed | ✅ Noticeably faster | ❌ Slower top speed |
| Power | ✅ Stronger, better pull | ❌ Weak on inclines |
| Battery Size | ✅ Much larger capacity | ❌ Small, drains faster |
| Suspension | ✅ Tyre gives pseudo-suspension | ❌ Fully rigid, harsh |
| Design | ✅ Mature, stealthy look | ❌ Toyish, dated styling |
| Safety | ✅ Dual brakes, headlight | ❌ Single brake, no lights |
| Practicality | ✅ Folds, fits under desk | ❌ Fixed, awkward size |
| Comfort | ✅ Smoother, less vibration | ❌ Very buzzy ride |
| Features | ✅ Modes, display, cruise | ❌ Barebones feature set |
| Serviceability | ✅ Closer to scooter norms | ❌ Toy-grade, less worth fixing |
| Customer Support | ✅ Good Razor support | ✅ Good Razor support |
| Fun Factor | ✅ More speed, more grin | ✅ Great fun for kids |
| Build Quality | ✅ Feels more "vehicle-like" | ❌ Toy-leaning execution |
| Component Quality | ✅ Better tyres, cockpit | ❌ Cheaper contact points |
| Brand Name | ✅ Strong Razor identity | ✅ Strong Razor identity |
| Community | ✅ More upgrade chatter | ❌ Mostly toy reviews |
| Lights (visibility) | ✅ Built-in headlight | ❌ No integrated lights |
| Lights (illumination) | ✅ Actually lights path | ❌ Needs aftermarket lights |
| Acceleration | ✅ Punchier off the line | ❌ Gentle, less exciting |
| Arrive with smile factor | ✅ Feels "properly fast" | ✅ Kids absolutely buzzing |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ✅ Less fatigue, smoother | ❌ Vibrations, basic braking |
| Charging speed | ✅ Reasonable half-day charge | ❌ Overnight or longer |
| Reliability | ✅ Simpler modern electronics | ✅ Proven simple hardware |
| Folded practicality | ✅ Compact when folded | ❌ Always full length |
| Ease of transport | ✅ Fold, carry short distances | ❌ Bulky for car boots |
| Handling | ✅ Stable yet nimble | ❌ Twitchier at speed |
| Braking performance | ✅ Electronic + foot brake | ❌ Foot brake only |
| Riding position | ✅ Suits teens, light adults | ❌ Fixed for kids only |
| Handlebar quality | ✅ Better grips, feel | ❌ Basic foam, small |
| Throttle response | ✅ Multi-mode, more nuance | ❌ On/off, little modulation |
| Dashboard / Display | ✅ Simple but informative | ❌ No display at all |
| Security (locking) | ✅ Easier to lock frame | ❌ Harder to secure neatly |
| Weather protection | ❌ No rating, basic sealing | ❌ No rating, not for rain |
| Resale value | ✅ Broader second-hand market | ❌ Narrow age window |
| Tuning potential | ✅ More mod-friendly base | ❌ Very limited upgrade path |
| Ease of maintenance | ✅ Familiar scooter layout | ✅ Simple toy-grade design |
| Value for Money | ✅ Better "vehicle" for price | ❌ Cheap but dated package |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the RAZOR Raven scores 6 points against the RAZOR Power Core XLR90's 4. In the Author's Category Battle, the RAZOR Raven gets 37 ✅ versus 7 ✅ for RAZOR Power Core XLR90 (with a few ties sprinkled in).
Totals: RAZOR Raven scores 43, RAZOR Power Core XLR90 scores 11.
Based on the scoring, the RAZOR Raven is our overall winner. Between these two, the Raven simply feels more like a tiny, sensible vehicle and less like something that should live next to the footballs and Nerf guns. It rides better, carries older riders with more confidence, and slots into real daily routines rather than just weekend playtime. The Power Core XLR90 still has its charm for younger kids, but its old-school tech and hard compromises become obvious very quickly. If you want a scooter that won't be outgrown almost as fast as the next shoe size, the Raven is the one that keeps everyone smiling for longer-and not just in the cul-de-sac.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.

