Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
The Teverun Space is the more complete scooter overall: it rides more refined at higher speeds, brakes harder and cleaner with hydraulics, and wraps everything in that "industrial art" design and LUMINA lighting that genuinely improves both safety and smugness. If you want a plush, confidence-inspiring, techy daily machine and don't mind a slightly heavier scooter and a bit higher price, the Space is the better long-term partner.
The Blade Mini Pro, though, hits a sweeter price, offers a chunk more battery, and still delivers properly fun dual-motor performance in a slightly lighter, more compact package. If your priority is maximum range and value in a powerful urban scooter that you can still wrestle up a few stairs or into a car boot, the Blade Mini Pro is your friend.
Both are legitimately good; the trick is matching the scooter to your life rather than your fantasies. Read on, because the details really do tilt the scales.
There was a time when "mid-range" electric scooters meant flimsy decks, rattling stems and batteries that gave up halfway home. Teverun clearly didn't get that memo. With the Blade Mini Pro and the Space, they've essentially built two different answers to the same question: "What if commuting was actually fun?"
The Blade Mini Pro is the compact city brawler: a dual-motor, grin-inducing little brute that thinks it's a much bigger scooter, especially when you point it at a hill or a long suburb-to-city commute. The Space is the suave older cousin - more power, more polish, more tech, more 'look at me' - aimed at riders who want their scooter to feel as considered as a premium laptop or a nice watch.
On paper they're close; on the road they feel surprisingly different. Let's dig in and see which one fits your streets, your body, and your patience for stairs.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
Both scooters live in that spicy "serious commuter" category: too powerful to be toys, still just light enough that normal humans can move them around without a gym membership. Dual motors, proper suspension, real range - we're not in rental-scooter land anymore.
The Blade Mini Pro targets the upgrader: someone coming from a Xiaomi/Segway who's discovered hills and long distances, and now wants something that keeps up with traffic without taking over their entire flat. It's the gateway drug into "proper" scooters.
The Space is for riders who already know they love scooting and want something that feels engineered, not assembled. Think slightly more power, more refined suspension, hydraulic brakes, and a design that screams "premium gadget" rather than "cost-optimised transport appliance".
Price-wise they sit in the same ballpark, but the Blade Mini Pro undercuts the Space a bit and quietly brings a larger battery to the party. That's why this comparison matters: you're choosing between raw value and range on one side, versus extra polish, braking and design on the other.
Design & Build Quality
Pick up the Blade Mini Pro (or more realistically, grunt it a few centimetres off the ground) and it feels like a compact, muscular tool. The frame is classic "performance commuter": chunky forged aluminium, exposed components in sensible places, practical deck with a proper rear kick plate. The lighting is bold and a bit shouty - yellow strips along stem and deck, turn signals, and a generally "look at my scooter" vibe. Everything is screwed together with purpose rather than delicacy.
The Space, in contrast, looks like someone fed "cyberpunk monolith" into a CAD program and actually built the result. The unibody frame, hidden cabling and clean angles make most other scooters look like prototype kits. Folding hardware is integrated rather than stuck on, and the charging port is tucked high and dry with a proper seal. The LUMINA lighting doesn't feel like an add-on; it's part of the sculpture.
In the hands, the Blade Mini Pro gives that solid, slightly industrial feeling - you're aware you're holding a machine. The Space feels more like a finished product in the consumer-electronics sense: fewer exposed edges, fewer places for cables to snag, and a very confidence-inspiring hinge with that satisfying "I'm not going anywhere" click.
If you value clean design and integrated details, the Space clearly leads. If you care more about straightforward, honest construction that's easy to understand and wrench on, the Blade Mini Pro has its own charm.
Ride Comfort & Handling
Both scooters take comfort seriously, but they do it with a slightly different flavour.
The Blade Mini Pro pairs dual spring suspension with fat, air-filled ten-inch tyres. Out on cracked tarmac and tiled bike lanes, it feels pleasantly bouncy - in a good way most of the time. It takes the sting out of potholes and curb drops, but heavier riders can get a bit of "pogo stick" if they hammer it over repetitive bumps. The wide handlebars and generous deck let you adopt a solid, athletic stance, which helps tame the bounce and makes aggressive carving through traffic feel very natural.
The Space feels more grown-up. Its springs are more precisely tuned, and with the wider tubeless tyres you get a calmer, more damped ride. Cobblestones and bad repairs are there, but they're background noise rather than personal attacks on your spine. Over several kilometres of rough city surfaces, the Space leaves you noticeably fresher - your knees don't complain, your hands don't fizz, and you're less tempted to start cursing your council's road maintenance budget.
In corners, the Blade Mini Pro feels nimble and playful, very willing to flick from side to side. The Space is slightly heavier, but that extra mass and the way the frame is put together make it feel planted, almost rail-like at higher speeds. It's the one you'd pick for sweeping, fast bike paths; the Blade Mini Pro is the one you'd pick for darting through dense city mess.
Performance
Let's talk shove. The Blade Mini Pro's dual motors deliver that classic dual-drive "oh, hello" moment when you punch the throttle. Thanks to sine-wave controllers, the power comes in smooth rather than snappy - you surge forward rather than lurch. It's easily fast enough to sit with urban traffic, and hills that killed your old single-motor scooter suddenly become non-events. You'll feel it dig in and just keep hauling, even when the road tilts up more than is polite.
The Space, however, has more muscle in reserve. Its dual motors hit harder, and the slightly higher-voltage system gives that extra punch when you demand it. Off the line, especially in full power mode, it steps ahead of the Blade Mini Pro and keeps that advantage as speeds climb. On long hills, the Space shrugs off gradients that make smaller scooters whimper; even heavy riders report it still feels eager rather than strained.
At top-end cruising speeds, the difference grows clearer. The Blade Mini Pro is perfectly capable up near its maximum, but you start to feel that you're asking a compact scooter to work. The Space feels like it was built for that pace - steering remains calm, the chassis doesn't twitch, brakes are ready to reel it all back in without drama.
Speaking of brakes: this is where the Space really earns its keep. Its hydraulic discs provide quiet, progressive, effortless stopping. One finger, firm but smooth deceleration, no squealing, minimal fiddle. The Blade Mini Pro's mechanical discs do stop you, and the E-ABS helps prevent lockups, but the levers need more pull and you're more likely to get that embarrassing "siren in a tunnel" squeal until you tune or upgrade them. If you ride fast in busy areas, the Space's braking alone is a compelling argument.
Battery & Range
On headline numbers, the Blade Mini Pro actually wins the battery arms race: its pack stores more energy and, unsurprisingly, will take you further if you ride both scooters in a similar way. Ridden sensibly - think moderate speeds, mixed single/dual motor use - it's entirely possible to get through most of a work week without idly staring at a charger in the evening. You can afford to "forget" to plug it in once or twice.
The Space counters with very honest range claims and good efficiency. In real commuting conditions - steady speeds, some hills, mixed weight riders - it consistently delivers what the spec sheet promises, and often a bit more if you're not a throttle hooligan. You're still talking multiple days of normal commuting on one charge, unless your idea of "normal" is full-send everywhere.
Charging rhythm is different. The Blade Mini Pro's bigger pack and standard charger mean you're looking at an overnight-and-then-some if you run it right down. For most people that's fine - plug it in before bed, forget about it. The Space, with fast charging support, can be fully revived in roughly a long working afternoon if you have the beefier charger, which is handy for high-mileage riders or office fast-tops between long legs.
If absolute maximum distance per charge is your obsession, the Blade Mini Pro quietly takes it. If you want solid, predictable range plus faster potential turnaround, the Space is slightly better behaved.
Portability & Practicality
Neither of these scooters is what you'd call "throw over your shoulder and jog for the bus", but there are meaningful differences.
The Blade Mini Pro is the lighter of the two by a small but noticeable margin. When you're dragging it up a couple of flights, or muscling it into a car boot, that matters. Its folded size is nicely compact, and the three-second folding mechanism is simple and quick once you've done it a few times. Slide it under a desk, park it in a hallway, even tuck it under a bed - very doable.
The Space, on the other hand, has a more refined folding action - that one-click clamp feels engineered, not improvised - but you're shifting a heavier, slightly bulkier piece of hardware. Carrying it is still possible for short stretches, but you won't enjoy doing that every day if stairs are involved. Where it shines is in "roll-and-stash" practicality: in a lift, in a garage, into a room; it behaves like a small personal vehicle more than like a big toy.
Both offer NFC locking and app integration, which is brilliant in real life: tap to wake and go, no key gymnastics. Mudguards are one of the few areas where both could be better. The Blade Mini Pro is notorious for giving your calves a free cold shower in wet weather; the Space is slightly better but still not full-wet-commuter perfection.
If you need to carry your scooter regularly or deal with very tight storage spaces, the Blade Mini Pro is friendlier. If you mostly roll between lift, corridor and parking spot, the extra solidity of the Space is a plus rather than a penalty.
Safety
Safety is where the philosophy gap really shows.
The Blade Mini Pro's safety package is built around visibility and predictability. Bright stem and deck lighting, high-mounted headlamp, and proper turn signals mean drivers have fewer excuses for not seeing you. The wide tyres give a fat contact patch and decent wet grip, and the chassis feels stiff enough that you don't get unnerving stem wobble when the speedo creeps up. Mechanical discs with E-ABS do the job, and once you're used to the lever feel, you can stop in a hurry without the wheels locking like a shopping trolley in a car park.
The Space, however, goes deeper. Hydraulic brakes simply inspire more confidence, especially if you're regularly pushing past casual speeds. Want to scrub a big chunk of speed before that junction? Two fingers, gentle squeeze, job done, almost no noise. The LUMINA system adds not just conspicuity but communication: pulsing, colour changes and multiple modes make it obvious when you're braking, accelerating or just cruising. Wider, tubeless tyres dig into wet and rough surfaces with authority, and the rock-solid front assembly massively reduces the risk of speed wobble.
Both have NFC locks for basic theft deterrence and app tools for monitoring, but the Space's overall "cohesive" safety package - brakes, lights, stability - feels closer to a mini-vehicle standard than a boosted toy.
Community Feedback
| Teverun Blade Mini Pro | Teverun Space |
|---|---|
|
What riders love Smooth sine-wave power delivery; strong dual-motor hill climbing; seriously good real-world range; bright 360° lighting with indicators; sturdy, confidence-inspiring frame; great value for the performance; compact but still comfortable deck and cockpit; NFC lock and app; playful, nimble handling; "premium feel" without premium-scooter bulk. |
What riders love Striking cyber-minimalist design; fantastic ride quality on bad roads; hydraulic brakes with huge confidence; punchy dual motors and strong hill performance; LUMINA lighting both for style and safety; solid, wobble-free chassis; honest, usable range; app and NFC integration; good weather resistance; the feeling of riding something genuinely special. |
|
What riders complain about Weight still a chore on stairs; mechanical brakes can squeal and need more maintenance; rear mudguard lets water decorate your legs; kickstand feels flimsy; long charge time if battery is fully depleted; finger throttle not everyone's favourite; charging port cover feels cheap; some wish for hydraulic brakes; suspension a bit bouncy for heavier riders; occasional shipping/packing issues causing brake rub. |
What riders complain about Heavy to carry and bulky when folded; brakes initially "too sharp" for new riders; after-sales support varies by dealer and can be slow; complex electrics make DIY repairs trickier; price a stretch for casual users; occasional error codes or display glitches; app pairing bugs for some phones; long charge without fast charger; tight fit in very small car boots; fenders could protect better in heavy rain. |
Price & Value
Here's where it gets interesting. The Blade Mini Pro comes in noticeably cheaper while offering more stored energy in the battery and still delivering proper dual-motor performance. From a cold-hearted spreadsheet angle, it's extremely hard to argue against: strong power, very good range, sine-wave controllers, flashy but useful lighting - all for less money. For many riders, that alone makes the decision.
The Space asks for a bit more cash and gives you more "soft value" in return: that cohesive design, better brakes, more refined suspension, and genuinely standout lighting integration. You're not paying for gigantically better raw numbers; you're paying for polish, feel, and a more premium day-to-day experience.
If your budget is tight but you still want to step firmly into serious-scooter territory, the Blade Mini Pro is phenomenal value. If you can stretch the extra, and you care about refinement as much as raw specs, the Space justifies its price very convincingly.
Service & Parts Availability
Both scooters come from the same broader Teverun ecosystem, which is good news for electronics and key components: controllers, motors, displays and NFC bits are not unicorns. In Europe, more and more dealers are carrying Teverun, and both models are popular enough that spares aren't exotic.
Where things diverge is complexity and support expectations. The Blade Mini Pro is mechanically straightforward: mechanical brakes, conventional springs, less exotic wiring. Any half-decent scooter or bike workshop can deal with pads, rotors, cables and general hardware. The Space, with its hydraulics, denser wiring and tightly integrated design, sometimes demands a bit more skill and patience if something goes wrong.
Community reports suggest that after-sales support can be patchy depending on the dealer, not so much on the model. If you buy from a strong retailer, both scooters are well supported; buy from a random cheapest-online seller and you're rolling the same dice either way.
Pros & Cons Summary
| Teverun Blade Mini Pro | Teverun Space |
|---|---|
Pros
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
Cons
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | Teverun Blade Mini Pro | Teverun Space |
|---|---|---|
| Motor power (rated) | 2x 500 W | 2x 800 W |
| Peak power | 2.400 W | 3.200 W |
| Top speed (unbridled) | 50 km/h | 55 km/h |
| Battery capacity | 48 V 20,8 Ah (998,4 Wh) | 52 V 18 Ah (936 Wh) |
| Claimed max range | 80 km | 60 km |
| Realistic commuting range (approx.) | 50-60 km | 40-55 km |
| Weight | 28,5 kg | 30 kg |
| Brakes | Dual mechanical disc + E-ABS | Dual hydraulic disc |
| Suspension | Dual spring (front & rear) | Precision-tuned spring (front & rear) |
| Tyres | 10 x 3 inch pneumatic | 10 inch tubeless anti-puncture |
| Max load | 120 kg | 120 kg |
| Water protection | IP54 | IPX4 |
| Charging time (standard) | ca. 12 h | ca. 12 h (ca. 5 h fast) |
| Price (approx.) | 1.015 € | 1.099 € |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
Both of these scooters sit firmly in the "I could actually replace my car for a lot of trips" category, and both do it with proper style. But they lean in different directions.
If you want maximum bang for your buck, longer range, and a slightly easier time dealing with stairs, tight storage and car boots - while still getting serious dual-motor fun - the Teverun Blade Mini Pro makes a seriously strong case. It's the logical step up from basic commuters: fast enough to thrill, friendly enough not to scare you, and kind to your wallet for what it delivers.
If, however, you care as much about how the scooter rides and feels as how fast it goes, the Teverun Space is the more complete package. The smoother high-speed stability, hydraulic brakes, more sophisticated suspension and that integrated industrial-art design add up to something that feels closer to a miniature vehicle than a hot-rodded scooter. For regular, faster commuting on mixed or rough surfaces, it simply feels more relaxing and more confidence-inspiring.
My take: go Blade Mini Pro if you're price-sensitive, range-hungry, and still want a compact powerhouse. Go Space if you want your daily ride to feel special every single time you unfold it - and you're willing to pay a bit more, and carry a bit more, to get that.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | Teverun Blade Mini Pro | Teverun Space |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ✅ 1,02 €/Wh | ❌ 1,17 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ❌ 20,30 €/km/h | ✅ 19,98 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ✅ 28,55 g/Wh | ❌ 32,05 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | ❌ 0,57 kg/km/h | ✅ 0,55 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ✅ 18,45 €/km | ❌ 23,13 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ✅ 0,52 kg/km | ❌ 0,63 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ✅ 18,15 Wh/km | ❌ 19,71 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ❌ 48,00 W/km/h | ✅ 58,18 W/km/h |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | ❌ 0,0119 kg/W | ✅ 0,0094 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ✅ 83,20 W | ❌ 78,00 W |
These metrics let you see how efficiently each scooter turns money, weight and battery into speed and range. Lower "price per Wh" means more battery for your euro; lower "weight per Wh" means a lighter scooter for the same energy. Efficiency (Wh per km) shows how gently they sip from the pack, while "power to max speed" and "weight to power" highlight how aggressively they can accelerate relative to their size. Charging speed simply tells you how quickly you can get back out riding after an empty battery.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | Teverun Blade Mini Pro | Teverun Space |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ✅ Slightly lighter, more manageable | ❌ Heavier, harder to carry |
| Range | ✅ Bigger battery, goes further | ❌ Shorter real-world distance |
| Max Speed | ❌ Slightly lower top end | ✅ Higher unbridled speed |
| Power | ❌ Less peak shove | ✅ Stronger dual-motor punch |
| Battery Size | ✅ Larger capacity pack | ❌ Smaller capacity pack |
| Suspension | ❌ Effective but a bit bouncy | ✅ More refined, composed |
| Design | ❌ Functional performance look | ✅ Cyber-minimalist industrial art |
| Safety | ❌ Good, but mechanical brakes | ✅ Hydraulics, stability, lighting |
| Practicality | ✅ Lighter, smaller when folded | ❌ Heavier, bulkier overall |
| Comfort | ❌ Can feel a bit bouncy | ✅ Smoother over bad surfaces |
| Features | ❌ Strong but simpler package | ✅ LUMINA, GPS, richer app |
| Serviceability | ✅ Simpler, easier to wrench | ❌ Complex, tighter packaging |
| Customer Support | 🤝 Similar, dealer-dependent | 🤝 Similar, dealer-dependent |
| Fun Factor | ✅ Playful, nimble, punchy | ❌ More serious, less cheeky |
| Build Quality | ❌ Very good, but less cohesive | ✅ Feels tank-solid, refined |
| Component Quality | ❌ Mechanical brakes, simpler bits | ✅ Hydraulics, higher-spec details |
| Brand Name | ✅ Same strong Teverun DNA | ✅ Same strong Teverun DNA |
| Community | ✅ Popular, plenty of owners | ✅ Popular, active user base |
| Lights (visibility) | ✅ 360° glow, indicators | ✅ LUMINA, extremely conspicuous |
| Lights (illumination) | ✅ High-mounted headlamp | ✅ Strong, integrated system |
| Acceleration | ❌ Strong, but softer | ✅ Harder, more urgent |
| Arrive with smile factor | ✅ Playful dual-motor antics | ✅ Slick, "spaceship" feeling |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ❌ More tiring over rough | ✅ Calmer, more composed ride |
| Charging speed | ✅ Slightly higher average W | ❌ Slightly lower average W |
| Reliability | ✅ Proven, simple hardware | ❌ More complexity, more to bug |
| Folded practicality | ✅ More compact footprint | ❌ Bigger, awkward in small cars |
| Ease of transport | ✅ Easier to lift, manoeuvre | ❌ Heavier, less carry-friendly |
| Handling | ✅ Nimble, playful in cities | ❌ Less flickable at low speed |
| Braking performance | ❌ Good, but mechanical | ✅ Strong, quiet hydraulics |
| Riding position | ✅ Comfortable, roomy enough | ✅ Equally comfy, more refined |
| Handlebar quality | ❌ Solid but more basic | ✅ Feels more premium |
| Throttle response | ✅ Smooth sine-wave delivery | ✅ Smooth, well-tuned power |
| Dashboard/Display | ❌ Good, but more utilitarian | ✅ Brighter, more integrated |
| Security (locking) | ✅ NFC, app, easy to use | ✅ NFC, GPS, app extras |
| Weather protection | ✅ IP54, decent sealing | ✅ IPX4, high port placement |
| Resale value | ✅ Great value keeps demand | ✅ Design icon, highly desirable |
| Tuning potential | ✅ Easy brake, tyre upgrades | ❌ Less mod-friendly layout |
| Ease of maintenance | ✅ Straightforward, accessible parts | ❌ Denser, more fiddly |
| Value for Money | ✅ More battery, lower price | ❌ Pricier for less Wh |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the TEVERUN BLADE MINI PRO scores 6 points against the TEVERUN SPACE's 4. In the Author's Category Battle, the TEVERUN BLADE MINI PRO gets 24 ✅ versus 24 ✅ for TEVERUN SPACE (with a few ties sprinkled in).
Totals: TEVERUN BLADE MINI PRO scores 30, TEVERUN SPACE scores 28.
Based on the scoring, the TEVERUN BLADE MINI PRO is our overall winner. Both of these scooters are genuinely enjoyable machines, but the Space feels like the more mature, rounded experience - the one you instinctively reach for when you want every ride to feel effortless, composed and just a bit special. The Blade Mini Pro fights back hard with better value and bigger range, and if you're budget-conscious or stair-cursed it remains a fantastic choice that will still make you grin daily. For me as a rider, though, the extra calm at speed, the braking confidence and the cohesive, futuristic feel of the Space tip the scales. It's the scooter that makes even a dull commute feel like you've snuck a little bit of sci-fi into your everyday life.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.

