Teverun SPACE vs Apollo City Pro: Futuristic Street Art Takes on the "Car Killer" Commuter

TEVERUN SPACE 🏆 Winner
TEVERUN

SPACE

1 099 € View full specs →
VS
APOLLO City Pro
APOLLO

City Pro

1 649 € View full specs →
Parameter TEVERUN SPACE APOLLO City Pro
Price 1 099 € 1 649 €
🏎 Top Speed 55 km/h 52 km/h
🔋 Range 60 km 50 km
Weight 30.0 kg 29.5 kg
Power 3200 W 2000 W
🔌 Voltage 52 V 48 V
🔋 Battery 936 Wh 960 Wh
Wheel Size 10 " 10 "
👤 Max Load 120 kg 120 kg
Speed Comparison

Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)

If you want the more exciting, better-value scooter that still feels solid and grown-up, the TEVERUN SPACE is the one to pick. It punches above its price with serious dual-motor shove, superb suspension comfort, hydraulic brakes, and that glorious LUMINA light show, all wrapped in a cyber-minimalist chassis that feels properly engineered.

The APOLLO City Pro, on the other hand, is a polished, safety-focused commuter with excellent regen braking, great weather protection, and a very refined overall feel - but you pay noticeably more for a package that, in performance terms, doesn't really pull ahead.

Choose the SPACE if you want maximum grin per euro and a scooter that feels like industrial art on wheels; choose the City Pro if you prioritise rain-or-shine commuting, regen braking and turn signals, and don't mind paying extra for that "finished consumer product" vibe.

Now, let's dig into how they really compare once you're actually standing on the deck and dodging traffic instead of reading spec sheets.

There are comparisons that feel unfair, and then there's this one. On paper, the TEVERUN SPACE and APOLLO City Pro occupy the same general niche: serious dual-motor city scooters that can replace a car for many riders. In reality, they take two very different roads to get there.

The SPACE arrives like it's just rolled off a concept stand at CES: cyber-minimalist frame, integrated lighting everywhere, hydraulic stoppers, and enough punch to make your old Xiaomi feel like a rental toy. It's the scooter for people who enjoy riding, not just arriving.

The City Pro, in contrast, is what happens when a UX designer is put in charge of an e-scooter project. Regen throttle, drum brakes, self-healing tyres, IP66, turn signals - it's the grown-up "tool" that wants to be your everyday vehicle more than your weekend adrenaline hit.

They cost very different money, but target surprisingly similar riders. And that's where it gets interesting. Let's break it down.

Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?

TEVERUN SPACEAPOLLO City Pro

Both scooters sit firmly in the "serious commuter with performance perks" class. These are not last-mile toys; they're for people doing real journeys, often every day, who still want some fun when the bike lane clears.

The TEVERUN SPACE is basically a compact "hyper-scooter lite": dual motors with strong peak output, a battery that comfortably covers typical weekly urban mileage, and suspension that shrugs at broken pavement. It's ideal if you're jumping between city districts, tackling hills, and occasionally opening the taps on a long riverside path.

The APOLLO City Pro positions itself as a premium, app-connected, weatherproof commuter. Its dual motors give it proper hill capability, but the focus is clearly on safety, control and comfort rather than outright savagery. Think of it as a very refined tool with a sporty mode, rather than a sport machine with commuting tacked on.

Why compare them? Because if you're looking at the City Pro, you're almost certainly cross-shopping other dual-motor mid-sized scooters with decent range and quality - and the SPACE lands right in that zone while undercutting it on price by a sizeable margin.

Design & Build Quality

Specs Comparison

Park these two side by side and the design philosophies jump out immediately.

The TEVERUN SPACE looks like someone took a block of metal and milled a scooter out of it. The unibody frame feels dense, with almost no exposed wiring. The folding joint locks with that reassuring "vault door" clunk. Even the charging port is tucked higher up and sealed, like the designers actually imagined rain and road grime might exist in the real world.

The APOLLO City Pro goes for a more "consumer electronics" aesthetic: angular, clean, slightly Apple-adjacent. The single-sided front fork and sculpted swingarms give it a futuristic stance, and the rubber deck mat is lovely underfoot and dead easy to clean. Cable routing is also nicely internal, and the whole thing feels well screwed together - no rattly rental-scooter vibes here either.

In the hand, the SPACE feels more like industrial hardware - very solid, slightly overbuilt, and visibly engineered for abuse. The City Pro feels more like a premium gadget: refined, cohesive, but with a bit less sheer mechanical theatre. Both are clearly a class above generic budget stuff, but the SPACE gives you more "metal and engineering per euro", while Apollo gives you a very slick, polished object... at a price.

Ride Comfort & Handling

This is where hours of riding tell you more than any spec line.

On the TEVERUN SPACE, the first thing you notice is how little of the road actually reaches your body. The precisely tuned dual-spring setup front and rear, combined with wide tubeless tyres, makes cracked bike lanes and patchy tarmac feel almost unfairly easy. You still feel the shape of the road, but the harshness is filtered out. I've done long city loops on it and stepped off feeling like I'd taken the elevator, not the cobblestones.

The APOLLO City Pro is also very comfortable - its triple-spring layout does a great job ironing out urban chatter. It's tuned a touch firmer, so you feel a bit more of the road texture through your legs, but in a controlled, "sports saloon" way rather than "old hatchback with shot shocks." Paired with its tubeless tyres, the ride is impressively smooth, just not quite as plushly isolating as the SPACE when the asphalt really breaks up.

Handling-wise, the SPACE feels planted and slightly more playful. The wide deck and stable stem inspire confidence when carving at speed, and the steering remains calm even when you let it stretch its legs. The City Pro's wider bars give loads of leverage and stability, and at moderate speeds it feels wonderfully composed. At the top end, it's still stable, but you're more aware that the chassis is tuned with commuting, not canyon carving, as priority one.

In short: for outright comfort on rough surfaces, the SPACE edges ahead. For a calm, controlled, "premium commuter" feel, the City Pro is excellent-but you can tell which one was tuned by people who really like going fast over bad roads.

Performance

Both these scooters are quick. How they deliver that speed is very different.

The TEVERUN SPACE has that classic dual-motor "whoops, I'm already there" feel. Even in tamer modes it gets up to city speeds briskly; open it up and it pulls hard enough that you learn to bend your knees and lean forward out of respect. Hill starts are a non-event - it simply goes, even with a heavier rider and a backpack full of poor life choices. Above legal limits it keeps climbing with a reassuring, linear surge rather than a frantic last gasp.

The APOLLO City Pro is more civilised in its aggression. Its dual motors deliver strong torque, but the MACH controllers smooth everything out. Instead of a punch in the spine, you get a firm, continuous shove. It's quick off the line, but feels deliberately restrained - like it's checking you've actually had your coffee before giving you full beans. On hills it's very capable, especially compared to single-motor commuters, though it doesn't have quite the same "drag the horizon towards you" attitude as the SPACE when gradients and rider weight stack up.

Top-end sensation? The SPACE feels like it has extra "headroom" - at its upper speeds it's still eager, and the chassis feels surprisingly calm for something in this class. The City Pro tops out a touch lower and feels more like it's reaching the natural ceiling of its design. Safe and stable, yes - but it doesn't tempt you in quite the same way to find out "what happens if I keep the throttle pinned just a bit longer".

Braking is another big difference. The SPACE relies on fully hydraulic discs, and they're fierce. Once you're used to them, the feel and power are fantastic, and emergency stops are short and drama-free. Early on, though, it's easy to grab a bit too much and nod your helmet. The City Pro's secret weapon is its dedicated regen throttle: you do most of your slowing with your left thumb, smoothly, feeding energy back into the battery, and only call on the drums when you really need extra bite. It's incredibly intuitive and addictive, but outright stopping distance lags behind the SPACE's aggressive hydraulics, especially at higher speeds.

Battery & Range

On paper the batteries are in the same ballpark; on the road, both are solid, but one gives you notably more range for your money.

The TEVERUN SPACE's pack is large enough that typical urban riders can comfortably get several days of commuting out of a single charge, even without babying the throttle. Ride hard, combine hills, headwinds and heavier riders, and you'll still clear a realistic daily round trip with margin. More conservative use at legal speeds makes "couple-of-workdays-per-charge" completely normal.

The APOLLO City Pro carries a slightly bigger battery and, unsurprisingly, manages a bit more real-world reach. Think "two full days of spirited commuting" or longer if you keep to calmer modes. That extra ten or so kilometres at realistic speeds is nice, but you are paying quite a lot more for it.

Charging is where Apollo hits back: the City Pro fills from empty in roughly a robust half-day with its stock fast charger, which is genuinely impressive for its capacity. The SPACE can charge quickly with a beefy charger too, but on the standard brick you're looking at more of an overnight affair. For most people that's fine - you plug in at home and forget about it - but if you're the "charge at the office and ride hard both ways" type, the City Pro's speed here is genuinely useful.

Range anxiety on either? Honestly, not much - they both outrun what most people will comfortably do in a day. The main difference is efficiency and value: the SPACE gives you very respectable range at a much lower price; the City Pro stretches that range further and recharges faster, but demands a hefty premium for the privilege.

Portability & Practicality

Let's get this out of the way: neither of these is "grab it with one hand and dance up three flights of stairs" portable. They both hover around the thirty-kilo mark. You feel every one of those kilos on the third staircase landing.

The TEVERUN SPACE's one-click folding mechanism is one of the nicest in its segment. It folds down quickly and locks with a confidence-inspiring clack - no faffing with wobbly collars or half-engaged hooks. Folded, it's still a chunky object, but it slides into the boot of a typical family car without a wrestling match as long as you don't also pack a month's worth of IKEA.

The APOLLO City Pro folds solidly too, but the hook-to-deck latch can be a bit finicky until you've learned the exact alignment dance. Once folded it's similarly bulky, and the wide, non-folding bars make it slightly more awkward in tight spots, doorways, and cramped lifts. Carrying either up more than a short flight of stairs is a "gym membership included" experience, but the City Pro's shape does it no favours here.

Day-to-day practicality is where their personalities split. The SPACE gives you GPS, NFC lock, and app tuning, but its water protection is "sensible in light rain, don't be an idiot in a storm". The City Pro's IP66 rating, low-maintenance drum brakes and self-healing tyres scream "I don't care what the forecast says." If your city throws wet commutes at you half the year, that matters.

So: the SPACE is more practical for people with a car boot or garage, who want an all-rounder that can also play weekend hooligan. The City Pro is more practical for those who live and ride in lousy weather and don't want to think about punctures or pad changes - as long as they're not carrying it far.

Safety

Both scooters take safety seriously, but they prioritise different aspects.

The TEVERUN SPACE builds its safety case on three pillars: very strong hydraulic braking, excellent chassis stability, and outrageous visibility. Those hydraulic discs give huge confidence when someone in a hatchback decides indicators are optional. The stiff unibody and tight folding joint mean no disconcerting stem wobble when you brake hard or dodge a pothole. And then there's the LUMINA system - side glow, stem strip, reactive patterns under throttle and braking - at night you're less "a scooter" and more "mobile light installation". Drivers notice you because they simply can't not.

The APOLLO City Pro counters with a different toolkit: the regen throttle that lets you scrub speed smoothly and predictably, very bright and properly aimed headlight, and - crucially - integrated turn signals front and rear. Being able to indicate without taking a hand off the bar is a genuine safety upgrade in city traffic. Add the self-healing tyres reducing the odds of a mid-corner pressure disaster, plus that tough water rating, and you get a scooter that feels built for messy, real-world commutes.

Overall braking confidence is slightly higher on the SPACE thanks to its hydraulic bite; overall "urban safety package" - especially in rain, with signals and regen braking - feels more complete on the City Pro. Pick your poison: brute mechanical stopping versus layered safety systems and weather armour.

Community Feedback

TEVERUN SPACE APOLLO City Pro
What riders love What riders love
Cyber-minimalist looks that turn heads;
ultra-smooth suspension and wide tyres;
strong dual-motor punch and hill climbing;
powerful hydraulic brakes;
LUMINA lights for visibility and style;
solid, wobble-free stem and folding;
genuinely usable range;
NFC lock and app tweaks;
feeling of "premium engineering" for the price.
"Cloud-like" ride feel;
superb regen braking experience;
great hill performance for heavy riders;
solid, rattle-free frame;
IP66 water resistance and self-healing tyres;
bright lights and turn signals;
low maintenance brakes and tyres;
fast charging;
sleek, professional design;
polished app integration.
What riders complain about What riders complain about
Heavy to carry upstairs;
brakes a bit grabby at first;
after-sales support uneven by dealer;
occasional error codes or display quirks;
app connection bugs for some;
long charge times on stock charger;
bulky size when folded;
fender coverage could be better in heavy rain.
Also heavy and awkward on stairs;
high purchase price;
rear splash protection not perfect in downpours;
folding latch a bit fiddly;
kickstand fussy on some surfaces;
thumb throttle can tire hands on long rides;
wide bars awkward in tight spaces;
loud charger fan annoying indoors.

Price & Value

This is where the conversation gets blunt.

The TEVERUN SPACE sits in the lower half of the serious dual-motor market, but feels like something from a class above. You get dual motors with real shove, hydraulic brakes, proper suspension, a big battery, and that integrated lighting system - all for what many brands charge for a warmed-over single-motor commuter with cable discs. In value terms, it's frankly aggressive.

The APOLLO City Pro asks for a very noticeable chunk more cash. For that, you get slightly higher real-world range, faster charging, drum-and-regen braking that's extremely low maintenance, stronger water resistance, turn signals, self-healing tyres, and Apollo's more established support infrastructure. It is a premium proposition, and it prices itself like one.

But does the riding experience feel that much better? In my view, no - just different. The City Pro is more polished and weather-ready; the SPACE is more thrilling and feels like much more scooter per euro. Unless you absolutely need the rain performance and maintenance simplicity, the SPACE simply delivers a stronger bang-for-buck story.

Service & Parts Availability

Service is the unsexy part of scooter ownership until something breaks.

APOLLO has put serious effort into support, with a relatively mature network, responsive customer service, and documented procedures. For common wear items and known issues, parts and guidance are generally easy to obtain, especially in Europe and North America. You still won't mistake it for your local car dealer network, but in scooter terms, it's above average.

TEVERUN, and the SPACE specifically, are climbing that ladder. The hardware is solid, but community reports about after-sales experiences are mixed and very dealer-dependent. Some riders get fast, competent help; others complain about slow responses or warranty wrangling. Parts exist, but getting the right ones quickly can be more of an adventure than it should be.

If you are not mechanically inclined and you want a smoother path for long-term ownership, Apollo has the edge here. If you're handy with tools or have a good local electric scooter shop, the SPACE's slightly rougher ecosystem becomes less of an issue.

Pros & Cons Summary

TEVERUN SPACE APOLLO City Pro
Pros
  • Excellent performance for the price
  • Plush, composed suspension on bad roads
  • Powerful hydraulic brakes with great feel
  • Striking cyber-minimalist design
  • Integrated LUMINA lighting and NFC lock
  • Solid, wobble-free frame and hinge
  • Very competitive real-world range
  • Good app integration and GPS features
Pros
  • Superb regen braking experience
  • IP66 water resistance for all-weather use
  • Self-healing tubeless tyres
  • Excellent ride comfort and stability
  • Bright headlight and integrated turn signals
  • Fast charging for quick turnarounds
  • Low-maintenance drums and tyres
  • Polished app and user experience
Cons
  • Heavy and not stair-friendly
  • Support quality varies by dealer
  • Brake power can feel abrupt initially
  • Standard charger is slow
  • Water protection decent but not class-leading
  • App and electronics slightly complex for DIY
Cons
  • Also heavy and bulky when folded
  • High purchase price for its class
  • Folding latch and kickstand a bit fussy
  • Rear splash protection imperfect in heavy rain
  • Wide bars awkward in tight spaces
  • Thumb throttle can cause fatigue for some

Parameters Comparison

Parameter TEVERUN SPACE APOLLO City Pro
Motor power (rated) 2x 800 W (dual motor) 2x 500 W (dual motor)
Peak power 3.200 W 2.000 W
Top speed (unlocked) ca. 55 km/h ca. 51,5 km/h
Battery capacity 52 V 18 Ah (936 Wh) 48 V 20 Ah (960 Wh)
Claimed max range ca. 60 km ca. 69,2 km
Realistic mixed range ca. 40-60 km ca. 35-50 km
Weight 30 kg 29,5 kg
Brakes Dual hydraulic discs Dual drum + regen throttle
Suspension Front & rear spring Front spring + dual rear springs
Tyres 10" tubeless, wide tread 10" tubeless self-healing
Max load 120 kg 120 kg
IP rating IPX4 IP66
Charging time (stock charger) ca. 10-12 h (fast ca. 5 h) ca. 4,5 h
Approximate price 1.099 € 1.649 €

Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?

Both the TEVERUN SPACE and APOLLO City Pro are proper, "real transport" scooters that can replace a lot of car and public-transport journeys. But they do not make equal sense for every rider - or every wallet.

If you want the scooter that feels more alive under your feet - the one that makes you smile every time you squeeze the throttle - the SPACE is the clear winner. It offers stronger performance, more playful dynamics, excellent comfort and braking, and that unique cyber-minimalist design, all for a price that frankly embarrasses a lot of its competition. Yes, you'll live with slightly weaker water protection and somewhat patchier official support, but the core machine is a joy.

The APOLLO City Pro is a very competent, well-rounded commuter that really shines if you ride in bad weather and hate maintenance. Its regen-plus-drum braking, IP66 rating, self-healing tyres and fast charging make it a seriously capable daily tool. The problem is that it charges a hefty premium for that polish, while not meaningfully outperforming the SPACE where most riders actually notice it: acceleration, ride feel, and fun.

So my advice is simple: if your city is mostly dry, or you can avoid truly awful weather, take the TEVERUN SPACE and enjoy the better ride and better value. If you're in a rain-soaked region, live on a diet of wet commutes, and want the closest thing to a "scooter appliance" with minimal fuss, the APOLLO City Pro remains a respectable, if pricey, choice.

Numbers Freaks Corner

Metric TEVERUN SPACE APOLLO City Pro
Price per Wh (€/Wh) ✅ 1,17 €/Wh ❌ 1,72 €/Wh
Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) ✅ 19,98 €/km/h ❌ 32,01 €/km/h
Weight per Wh (g/Wh) ❌ 32,05 g/Wh ✅ 30,73 g/Wh
Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) ✅ 0,55 kg/km/h ❌ 0,57 kg/km/h
Price per km of real-world range (€/km) ✅ 21,98 €/km ❌ 36,64 €/km
Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) ✅ 0,60 kg/km ❌ 0,66 kg/km
Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) ✅ 18,72 Wh/km ❌ 21,33 Wh/km
Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) ✅ 58,18 W/km/h ❌ 38,83 W/km/h
Weight to power ratio (kg/W) ✅ 0,00938 kg/W ❌ 0,01475 kg/W
Average charging speed (W) ❌ 187,2 W ✅ 213,33 W

These metrics look purely at maths, not feelings. Price-per-Wh and price-per-km tell you how far each euro gets you, weight-based metrics show how much scooter you're hauling around for the performance and range you get, and Wh-per-km reveals efficiency. Power-to-speed and weight-to-power ratios indicate how "muscular" the scooter is for its top speed, while average charging speed simply describes how quickly, in electrical terms, each battery can be refilled.

Author's Category Battle

Category TEVERUN SPACE APOLLO City Pro
Weight ❌ Slightly heavier overall ✅ Marginally lighter, similar
Range ❌ Slightly less real range ✅ Goes a bit further
Max Speed ✅ Higher top-end headroom ❌ Slightly slower overall
Power ✅ Stronger peak punch ❌ Softer overall output
Battery Size ❌ Tiny bit smaller pack ✅ Slightly larger capacity
Suspension ✅ Plusher over bad roads ❌ Firmer, less isolating
Design ✅ Bolder, cyber-minimalist art ❌ Safe, polished but tamer
Safety ❌ Fewer safety extras ✅ Signals, regen, IP66
Practicality ❌ Less weather, more hassle ✅ Better in daily grind
Comfort ✅ Softer, very forgiving ❌ Comfortable but less plush
Features ✅ Lights, NFC, GPS, app ❌ Fewer "wow" extras
Serviceability ❌ Ecosystem smaller, trickier ✅ Better docs, support paths
Customer Support ❌ Dealer-dependent, inconsistent ✅ Generally stronger reputation
Fun Factor ✅ More playful, more grin ❌ Efficient, less exciting
Build Quality ✅ Chunky, tank-like frame ✅ Solid, rattle-free build
Component Quality ✅ Strong core hardware ✅ Very good components
Brand Name ❌ Newer, less established ✅ Stronger global presence
Community ❌ Smaller, still growing ✅ Bigger, more active
Lights (visibility) ✅ LUMINA makes you pop ❌ Bright but less dramatic
Lights (illumination) ❌ Good, but not standout ✅ Strong focused headlight
Acceleration ✅ Sharper, stronger launch ❌ Smooth but milder
Arrive with smile factor ✅ Feels like a mini rocket ❌ Efficient, less emotional
Arrive relaxed factor ✅ Plush, easy on body ✅ Calm, composed commuter
Charging speed ❌ Slower on typical setup ✅ Noticeably faster refill
Reliability ❌ Some error reports ✅ Iterated, well-proven
Folded practicality ✅ Simple, solid one-click fold ❌ Hook system more fiddly
Ease of transport ✅ Shape nicer to handle ❌ Wide bars, awkward
Handling ✅ Playful yet stable ❌ Stable, less engaging
Braking performance ✅ Strong hydraulic bite ❌ Good but less bitey
Riding position ✅ Natural stance, big deck ✅ Good bar width, stance
Handlebar quality ✅ Solid, confidence-inspiring ✅ Wide, ergonomic feel
Throttle response ✅ Direct, engaging feel ❌ Softer, less lively
Dashboard/Display ✅ Bright, modern interface ✅ Clear, integrated nicely
Security (locking) ✅ NFC + app benefits ❌ Less integrated security
Weather protection ❌ Adequate, not amazing ✅ Class-leading in segment
Resale value ❌ Less brand pull used ✅ Stronger second-hand demand
Tuning potential ✅ More power to play with ❌ More locked-in feeling
Ease of maintenance ❌ Hydraulics, complexity higher ✅ Drums, tyres low fuss
Value for Money ✅ Outstanding spec for price ❌ Expensive for what you get

Overall Winner Declaration

Winner

In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the TEVERUN SPACE scores 8 points against the APOLLO City Pro's 2. In the Author's Category Battle, the TEVERUN SPACE gets 24 ✅ versus 21 ✅ for APOLLO City Pro (with a few ties sprinkled in).

Totals: TEVERUN SPACE scores 32, APOLLO City Pro scores 23.

Based on the scoring, the TEVERUN SPACE is our overall winner. For me, the TEVERUN SPACE is the scooter that lingers in your mind after you park it - the one you look back at over your shoulder. It rides like something more expensive, feels solid under your feet, and manages to turn boring commutes into small daily adventures. The APOLLO City Pro is a competent, mature partner for serious commuting, especially where weather and low maintenance are non-negotiable, but it doesn't quite stir the same emotion. If you want your scooter to feel like a machine you enjoy as much as you rely on, the SPACE is simply the more satisfying companion.

That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.