Teverun SPACE vs Apollo Phantom V4 - Futuristic Street Art Takes on the Scooter Icon

TEVERUN SPACE
TEVERUN

SPACE

1 099 € View full specs →
VS
APOLLO Phantom V4 🏆 Winner
APOLLO

Phantom V4

1 779 € View full specs →
Parameter TEVERUN SPACE APOLLO Phantom V4
Price 1 099 € 1 779 €
🏎 Top Speed 55 km/h 66 km/h
🔋 Range 60 km 80 km
Weight 30.0 kg 34.9 kg
Power 3200 W 3200 W
🔌 Voltage 52 V 52 V
🔋 Battery 936 Wh 1216 Wh
Wheel Size 10 " 10 "
👤 Max Load 120 kg 130 kg
Speed Comparison

Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)

The TEVERUN SPACE is the better all-rounder for most riders: it delivers genuinely punchy dual-motor performance, superb comfort, fantastic lighting, and a very polished design at a noticeably lower price. The Apollo Phantom V4 hits harder on outright speed, range and big-scooter presence, but you pay more, carry more, and live with a bit more fuss.

Choose the SPACE if you want a fast, stylish, techy daily scooter that still feels manageable in real life. Choose the Phantom V4 if you are a power commuter or heavier rider who values extra range and weekend-warfare performance more than budget and portability. Both are serious machines - but one feels like a smart, modern choice rather than an indulgence.

If you want to know which one will actually make your commute the best part of your day, keep reading.

There was a time when "mid-range performance scooter" meant clattery stems, exposed spaghetti wiring and lighting that did little more than annoy dogs. Those days are, thankfully, numbered. The TEVERUN SPACE and the Apollo Phantom V4 represent the grown-up end of the performance-commuter spectrum: real vehicles you could happily rack up thousands of kilometres on.

I've spent serious saddle time on both - long commutes, night rides, badly paved old-town streets, the odd guilty-cycle-path blast - and they approach the same mission from very different angles. One feels like a sleek piece of industrial design that just happens to be fast; the other, like a big-boned performance platform civilised enough to commute on.

Think of the TEVERUN SPACE as the "tech-savvy urban weapon" and the Phantom V4 as the "weekend warrior that also goes to work". They absolutely belong in the same conversation - but they won't suit the same rider. Let's unpack where each one shines, and where the shine rubs off.

Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?

TEVERUN SPACEAPOLLO Phantom V4

Both scooters live in the enthusiast commuter bracket: far beyond rental toys, but not yet in the bonkers, 40-kg, 80-km/h widowmaker territory. Dual motors, proper suspension, real brakes, smart features - these are machines you actually plan around, not just hop on occasionally.

The TEVERUN SPACE sits at the lighter, more affordable end of this class. It's a dual-motor scooter that still feels like something you could live with daily without rearranging your hallway, your back and your bank account. It aims squarely at riders stepping up from basic commuters who want more power, more style and real comfort, but aren't chasing maximum numbers.

The Apollo Phantom V4, meanwhile, pushes into "big boy scooter" territory: heavier frame, larger battery, higher top speed, longer range. It's for riders who want to do an entire workday of commuting and then still have juice to misbehave in the evening. The price and weight reflect that ambition.

They compete because, on paper, they promise a similar thing: dual motors, strong braking, long-enough range, advanced apps and a very modern look. In reality, they make different compromises - and those compromises will decide which one you'll actually enjoy owning.

Design & Build Quality

Specs Comparison

Pick up the TEVERUN SPACE (or rather, try to) and the first impression is how cohesive it feels. The frame looks like it was milled out of a single futuristic slab - no random brackets, no dangling cables, no "this bit clearly came off a bicycle" moments. The wiring is tucked away, the folding joint is neat, and the whole thing gives off a clean, almost Apple-esque industrial vibe. It's design that clearly started on a blank page, not a catalogue.

The LUMINA lighting system is not just tinsel; it's built into the scooter's bones. Stem, deck, switches - everything glows with intent. Up close, tolerances around the folding clamp, stem and deck all feel tight, with that reassuring "solid clunk" when you lock it open. There's very little of the creaking or flex that plagues cheaper dual-motor setups.

The Apollo Phantom V4 plays a different aesthetic card. It looks muscular and slightly angry - the cast "skeleton" neck, the chunky swingarms and the wide cockpit give it a proper big-scooter stance. The finish is generally good, with a robust matte coating that shrugs off scuffs and grime. The integrated hexagonal display is the centrepiece: it makes almost every generic round LCD throttle look like a toy.

That said, the Phantom feels more "mechanical" than "sculpted". You can see more bolts, more joints, more "I am a machine" honesty in the design. Nothing wrong with that, but if you're into ultra-clean lines and hidden everything, the SPACE looks and feels more refined in the hand. On the Phantom, things like the kickstand and fenders are functional but slightly more prone to rattles if you don't stay on top of them.

In pure build impression, the Phantom feels like a heavy-duty piece of kit designed to be abused; the SPACE feels like a modern product designed to be lived with. They're both solid, but the Teverun wins on perceived sophistication and finish.

Ride Comfort & Handling

Comfort is where the TEVERUN SPACE quietly embarrasses a lot of more expensive scooters. That "precised" dual spring suspension isn't marketing fluff. On broken city asphalt, it soaks up the sharp edges so well that you stop scanning the road obsessively and just ride. Add the wide, tubeless tyres and you get that lovely muted "thud" instead of teeth-chattering "clack" when you roll over expansion joints and cobbles.

After a few kilometres of nasty paving, my knees still felt fresh on the SPACE, and my hands weren't buzzing. The deck is long and wide enough that you can shift stance mid-ride; taller riders won't be cursing the stem height either. Handling is neutral and confidence-inspiring - it turns in predictably without feeling twitchy, and the low centre of gravity from the battery placement really helps in fast direction changes.

The Phantom V4 counters with more suspension hardware: its quadruple spring setup gives you greater travel and a distinctly "big scooter" float when you're cruising at higher speeds. At 40-50 km/h, it really shines. You roll over rough patches with a composed, gliding feel that makes long, fast commutes very pleasant. The wide pneumatic tyres bite well when you lean it over, and the cockpit's width gives you plenty of leverage.

There is a flip side: the extra weight up front and the sheer mass of the Phantom mean it feels more serious to handle at walking pace. Threading through tight pedestrian areas or doing slow U-turns requires more body English and attention. It's stable - impressively so at speed - but it's less "chuckable" than the SPACE around tight urban manoeuvres.

If your daily riding is mostly under city speeds with plenty of stops, turns and awkward paths, the SPACE feels lighter on its feet and just more fun to place. If you routinely cruise at higher speeds on long stretches, the Phantom's bigger suspension and heft start to pay off.

Performance

On the TEVERUN SPACE, the first tug of the throttle gives you that satisfying dual-motor shove without drama. It pulls hard enough to raise eyebrows if you're coming from a rental or a basic commuter, but the power delivery is smooth and very controllable. In higher modes it springs off the line eagerly, ideal for beating the traffic away from lights and clearing junctions quickly - a genuine safety advantage as much as a grin generator.

The claimed top-end is well into the "are you sure this is still a scooter?" zone, and it gets there with enough urgency to be entertaining, yet not so violently that you're clinging on for dear life. Hill climbs are its party trick for this weight bracket: where single-motor machines audibly suffer, the SPACE just digs in and keeps pulling, even with heavier riders. It feels like a "lite" hyper-scooter wrapped in a civilised package.

The Phantom V4, unsurprisingly, takes everything up a notch. In its spicier modes - especially once you enable the equivalent of "Ludicrous" - the acceleration is properly aggressive. Squeeze the throttle hard and the front end wants to lighten; you'll be pushing yourself into that rear footrest pretty quickly. It's the kind of pull that can startle new riders if they skip the gentler presets.

Top speed goes beyond what is sensible on most bike lanes, and the Phantom sits there effortlessly. Long hill climbs? It doesn't really care. You can storm up serious gradients at real-world speeds with a heavy rider and a backpack and still have throttle in hand. The extra weight actually helps here - the chassis feels planted when you're charging uphill or blasting along a straight.

Braking is strong on both, but they feel different. The SPACE's fully hydraulic discs deliver that crisp, one-finger, "I know exactly what's happening under the tyres" feel, though you do need a little finesse initially to avoid over-braking. Once dialled in, the combination of hydraulic bite and predictable chassis makes emergency stops feel very controlled.

The Phantom's brakes - mechanical or hydraulic depending on spec - are also excellent, augmented by regenerative braking that helps scrub speed early. Modulation is good and the longer wheelbase gives you more stability when you really haul on the levers. It's very confidence-inspiring at higher speeds, which is exactly where you need it most.

If performance for you means "raw pace and hill-devouring power", the Phantom V4 wins. If it means "fast enough to be thrilling, but friendly and easy to live with", the TEVERUN SPACE is much closer to that sweet spot.

Battery & Range

The TEVERUN SPACE lands squarely in the "more than enough for real life" category. In normal mixed riding - some enthusiastic throttle, some cruising, a few hills - it delivers a solid commute-with-a-bit-extra. For the classic city pattern of a there-and-back daily trip with a detour or two, it'll comfortably cover several days on a single charge if you're not mercilessly pinning it.

Push it hard at full chat, and the range understandably dips, but not to the point of being annoying. More importantly, power stays consistent until quite late in the battery; you don't get that sad, saggy feeling halfway home where the scooter suddenly turns into a lethargic rental. The app's precise battery read-out is genuinely useful for planning.

The Phantom V4 brings brute capacity to the fight. Its battery is significantly larger, and in real-world use you feel that in two ways: you can stretch much longer rides in one go, and you can be downright irresponsible with the throttle for longer before worrying about limping home. For longer suburban commutes, or if you're the sort who does big weekend loops, that extra buffer is comforting.

Even ridden enthusiastically, the Phantom tends to get you through a long day of mixed riding without range anxiety, particularly if you start full. The downside is charging time: with a pack that big, topping up takes a while unless you invest in faster chargers. The SPACE, with its smaller battery, is easier to refill in a normal overnight window or even a half-day office plug-in.

So: SPACE = "efficient, enough, easy to keep topped up"; Phantom = "bring on the long days, but be patient at the socket".

Portability & Practicality

Neither of these is a featherweight last-mile toy, but they sit on different rungs of the "will my shoulders hate me?" ladder.

The TEVERUN SPACE, at roughly thirty kilos, is firmly in the "you can lift it, but you won't be delighted about it" zone. One or two flights of stairs is doable, daily serious stair-climbing is a gym membership in disguise. The one-click folding mechanism is a pleasure though: quick, secure, and it folds into a clean, manageable shape that fits nicely into most car boots and urban storage corners.

The Phantom V4 lives a league up in heft. Mid-thirties in kilos doesn't sound vastly more on paper, but in the real world it's the difference between "grunt and lift" and "are we sure we need to move this?". Carrying it up multiple flights regularly is not something I'd wish on my knees. Folded, it's still a sizeable, dense object; it will go in car boots, but you're planning around it rather than casually tossing it in.

In day-to-day practicality terms, the SPACE is friendlier: easier to manoeuvre in tight corridors, less enraging to pivot around in a flat, and just that much more manageable if you mix in a train or have awkward home storage. The Phantom demands more commitment: garage, ground floor, lift, or strong arms required. In return, you get that solid, planted feel on the road and the big-scooter stability it buys you.

Safety

Both scooters take safety seriously, but they prioritise slightly different aspects.

The TEVERUN SPACE's trump cards are its hydraulic brakes, excellent grip from the wider tubeless tyres, and its structural solidity. The near-absence of stem play, the reassuring "lock" of the folding joint and the low centre of gravity combine to make high-speed runs feel far less sketchy than on many peers. And that LUMINA lighting... this thing doesn't just have lights, it speaks in light. Brake-linked colour changes and pulsing stem/deck strips mean other road users pretty much can't miss you at night.

The Phantom V4 leans heavily on outright stability and serious, functional lighting. The headlight is not a token glowworm; it genuinely throws a proper beam down the road so you can see what you're about to ride into. Combined with deck lighting and indicators, you get decent 360° presence, even if the rear signals could do with being higher and more conspicuous in daylight.

High-speed stability is where the Phantom really excels: the refined steering geometry and reinforced neck reduce the dreaded "death wobble" to a non-issue if your tyres are properly set up. At the sort of speeds where you'd frankly be insane to be on a bike lane, it still feels calm and composed.

In the wet, the SPACE's wider, tubeless rubber inspires a touch more confidence, and the integrated lights make a real difference in murky conditions. The Phantom's IP rating is slightly better on paper, and its full-coverage fenders are more generous, but its tubed tyres do demand more vigilance with pressures to maintain optimum grip and avoid pinch flats.

Safety summary: Teverun feels like it over-delivers on braking and visibility in urban chaos; Apollo over-delivers on stability when you're properly hooning.

Community Feedback

TEVERUN SPACE APOLLO Phantom V4
What riders love What riders love
Clean "cyber-minimal" design and integrated lighting.
Exceptionally smooth ride for its class.
Strong, punchy dual-motor feel.
Hydraulic brakes and solid folding joint.
Legit real-world range and good app features.
Striking, aggressive design and iconic frame.
Plush suspension and "gliding" feel at speed.
Big, premium centre display.
High-speed stability and strong acceleration.
Deep app integration and cockpit ergonomics.
What riders complain about What riders complain about
Heavy to lug up stairs.
Brakes initially too grabby for some.
Patchy dealer support in some regions.
Occasional error codes / display quirks.
Long charge time with the basic charger.
Tubed tyres and flat anxiety.
High weight; awkward to carry.
Kickstand and fender rattles over time.
Display visibility in bright sun.
Folding latch and standard charger could be better.

Price & Value

This is where things get blunt. The TEVERUN SPACE sits in a very competitive sweet spot. For what you pay, you get dual motors, fully hydraulic brakes, a genuinely premium frame, sophisticated lighting and a decent battery. Many competitors ask similar money for single-motor setups with worse suspension and nowhere near this level of design work.

The Phantom V4, on the other hand, lives in a noticeably higher price bracket. Yes, you get more battery, more speed, more range, a heavier-duty frame and a beautifully integrated cockpit. But the value proposition is less clear-cut. There are rivals around the same price that either offer more raw hardware or similar hardware with a different flavour. The Phantom earns its keep more on refinement, brand ecosystem and that very complete, polished feel than on pure spec maths.

If you're counting euros and want maximum "wow, this is a lot of scooter for the money", the SPACE makes a stronger argument. The Phantom is something you justify as an indulgence in quality and capability rather than a bargain.

Service & Parts Availability

Service is where brand maturity really matters. Apollo has spent a lot of time building a support infrastructure, particularly in North America and increasingly in Europe. That means documented procedures, relatively easy access to spares, and an app ecosystem that continues to be updated. It's not flawless - you'll find your share of grumbles about response times - but at least there's a clear door to knock on.

Teverun is newer as a brand, and support quality can vary more depending on which dealer you buy from. Parts exist, but you're often going via the retailer or regional importer rather than a big, centralised system. That said, the SPACE's design is fairly modular, and common wear items like tyres, brake pads and the like are standard enough that any half-competent shop can deal with them.

If hand-holding, documented service and easy warranty navigation are priorities, Apollo has the edge. If you're comfortable with a bit more DIY spirit and a good local dealer, the TEVERUN SPACE is still a perfectly safe bet.

Portability & Practicality

Day-to-day, both scooters work well as "car replacements" for many people. You get enough range, enough speed and enough comfort to stop thinking about buses and parking fees.

The TEVERUN SPACE makes life easier if your routine involves any lifting, tight hallways, or smaller car boots. The folding action is quick and reassuring, the footprint when folded is manageable, and the weight - while not light - is just within what most reasonably fit adults can haul briefly without seeing stars. Its app and NFC system add genuine everyday convenience: tap to unlock, glance at your phone for exact battery, track it if someone decides they like it too much.

The Phantom is more of a "park it where it lives" vehicle. Use case: garage at home, lift at work, straight ride between the two. For that, it's brilliant - a proper, stable platform with enough capacity to ignore charging for days. But every time you do need to drag it somewhere, you're reminded you bought the hefty one.

Pros & Cons Summary

TEVERUN SPACE APOLLO Phantom V4
Pros
  • Superb ride comfort for its size.
  • Strong dual-motor punch, great hill ability.
  • Fully hydraulic brakes out of the box.
  • Sleek, cohesive "industrial art" design.
  • Brilliant integrated lighting and NFC/app features.
  • Very solid value for the price.
Pros
  • Serious acceleration and top speed.
  • Large battery and strong real-world range.
  • Excellent high-speed stability and suspension.
  • Premium cockpit with big integrated display.
  • Strong brand ecosystem and app tuning.
  • Great for heavier riders and long commutes.
Cons
  • Still heavy for frequent carrying.
  • Support quality depends on dealer.
  • Brakes can feel too grabby at first.
  • Standard charging is slow without fast charger.
  • Not ideal if you only need short, flat hops.
Cons
  • Very heavy and bulky to move.
  • Tubed tyres more prone to flats.
  • Price sits on the high side.
  • Minor rattles and kickstand quirks over time.
  • Display can wash out in strong sun.

Parameters Comparison

Parameter TEVERUN SPACE APOLLO Phantom V4
Motor power (rated) 2x 800 W hub motors 2.400 W dual hub motors
Peak power 3.200 W 3.200 W
Top speed (unbridled) 55 km/h 66 km/h
Battery 52 V 18 Ah (936 Wh) 52 V 23,4 Ah (1.216 Wh)
Claimed max range 60 km 72-80 km
Real-world range (typical) 35-60 km (rider/style dependent) 40-55 km (rider/style dependent)
Weight 30,0 kg 34,9 kg
Brakes Fully hydraulic discs Disc (mechanical or hydraulic) + regen
Suspension Dual precision springs (front & rear) Quadruple spring suspension
Tyres 10" tubeless anti-puncture 10" pneumatic (inner tube)
Max load 120 kg 130 kg
IP rating IPX4 IP54
Charging time Ca. 5 h (fast), ca. 12 h (standard) Ca. 6-9 h (standard)
Approx. price 1.099 € 1.779 €

Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?

If you strip away the spec sheets and just think about living with these scooters, the TEVERUN SPACE comes across as the better balanced package for most riders. It's fast enough to be properly fun, comfortable enough to ride daily on bad surfaces, refined enough to be proud of, and - crucially - it doesn't mug your wallet. You get dual motors, hydraulic brakes, slick design and a very grown-up ride feel at a price that still makes sense.

The Apollo Phantom V4 is undeniably the more serious machine on paper. It goes faster, further, and feels almost unshakeable when you're hammering along at speeds that would get you a stern letter from pretty much any city council. If you're a heavier rider, have longer commutes, or you simply value that "big scooter" stability above all else, it still earns its place - especially if you'll make real use of the extra range and power, not just brag about it.

But for the majority of riders upgrading from entry-level scooters and looking for something they'll happily use every day, the SPACE just hits the mark more cleanly. It gives you the thrill of a performance scooter without the constant reminder that you bought a small motorcycle in disguise. If your commute is mostly urban, with the odd weekend blast, the Teverun feels like the smart choice; the Phantom feels like the indulgent one.

So my advice is simple: if you want the scooter that will quietly make every ride smoother, safer and more enjoyable while still letting you have a bit of a hooligan moment now and then, go for the TEVERUN SPACE. If you know you're the type who will live at higher speeds on longer runs and you're willing to pay - in money and kilos - for that extra headroom, the Apollo Phantom V4 remains a solid, if less value-driven, option.

Numbers Freaks Corner

Metric TEVERUN SPACE APOLLO Phantom V4
Price per Wh (€/Wh) ✅ 1,17 €/Wh ❌ 1,46 €/Wh
Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) ✅ 20,00 €/km/h ❌ 26,95 €/km/h
Weight per Wh (g/Wh) ❌ 32,05 g/Wh ✅ 28,69 g/Wh
Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) ❌ 0,55 kg/km/h ✅ 0,53 kg/km/h
Price per km of real-world range (€/km) ✅ 21,98 €/km ❌ 37,44 €/km
Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) ✅ 0,60 kg/km ❌ 0,73 kg/km
Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) ✅ 18,72 Wh/km ❌ 25,60 Wh/km
Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) ❌ 29,09 W/km/h ✅ 36,36 W/km/h
Weight to power ratio (kg/W) ❌ 0,0188 kg/W ✅ 0,0145 kg/W
Average charging speed (W) ❌ 78,00 W ✅ 162,13 W

These metrics put hard numbers on different aspects of efficiency and value. Price per Wh and price per km/h show how much you pay for energy capacity and theoretical speed. Weight-related metrics tell you how efficiently each scooter turns kilos into speed and range. Wh per km is a simple efficiency indicator: how much energy you burn per kilometre. Power-to-speed and weight-to-power illustrate how much punch you get relative to speed and mass, while average charging speed reveals how quickly each scooter can realistically get back on the road from empty.

Author's Category Battle

Category TEVERUN SPACE APOLLO Phantom V4
Weight ✅ Noticeably lighter overall ❌ Heavier, harder to lift
Range ❌ Solid but smaller pack ✅ More real-world distance
Max Speed ❌ Fast, but slightly lower ✅ Higher top-end headroom
Power ❌ Strong, but less muscle ✅ More shove in reserve
Battery Size ❌ Smaller capacity ✅ Larger long-haul pack
Suspension ✅ Superb for urban speeds ❌ Better only when very fast
Design ✅ Cleaner, more cohesive look ❌ Busier, more mechanical
Safety ✅ Better lights, tubeless grip ❌ Great, but flats and signals
Practicality ✅ Easier to live with ❌ Bulkier, needs more space
Comfort ✅ Fantastic at city speeds ✅ Excellent for fast cruising
Features ✅ NFC, rich lighting, app ✅ Advanced app, big display
Serviceability ❌ Brand still bedding in ✅ Better documented ecosystem
Customer Support ❌ Dealer-dependent, inconsistent ✅ Stronger central support
Fun Factor ✅ Playful, agile, glowing ❌ Serious, less cheeky
Build Quality ✅ Very tight, refined feel ✅ Robust, heavy-duty chassis
Component Quality ✅ Strong for price bracket ✅ High-grade in key areas
Brand Name ❌ Newer, less established ✅ Well-known enthusiast brand
Community ❌ Smaller, still growing ✅ Large, active user base
Lights (visibility) ✅ LUMINA, impossible to miss ❌ Good, but less dramatic
Lights (illumination) ❌ More about being seen ✅ Strong usable headlight
Acceleration ❌ Punchy but milder ✅ More savage when unleashed
Arrive with smile factor ✅ Fun, engaging, stylish ✅ Thrilling for speed lovers
Arrive relaxed factor ✅ Calm, composed commuter ❌ More intense overall feel
Charging speed ❌ Slower on stock charger ✅ Faster average fill rate
Reliability ✅ Hardware generally solid ✅ Mature platform by now
Folded practicality ✅ Smaller, easier to stash ❌ Bigger lump when folded
Ease of transport ✅ Manageable short carries ❌ Painful to haul often
Handling ✅ Nimble, light on its feet ❌ Stable, but more cumbersome
Braking performance ✅ Strong hydraulics, great feel ✅ Powerful, aided by regen
Riding position ✅ Natural, relaxed stance ✅ Spacious, supportive deck
Handlebar quality ✅ Solid, clean controls ✅ Wide, ergonomic cockpit
Throttle response ✅ Smooth, intuitive tuning ✅ Highly configurable via app
Dashboard/Display ❌ Functional, less dramatic ✅ Large, premium centre screen
Security (locking) ✅ NFC, app, GPS options ❌ Less integrated lock tech
Weather protection ❌ Basic IP, modest fenders ✅ Better rating, coverage
Resale value ❌ Newer brand, more unknown ✅ Stronger second-hand demand
Tuning potential ✅ App plus enthusiast mods ✅ Deep app and firmware tweaks
Ease of maintenance ❌ More complex electronics ✅ Better documentation, support
Value for Money ✅ Outstanding for what you get ❌ Good, but pricey

Overall Winner Declaration

Winner

In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the TEVERUN SPACE scores 5 points against the APOLLO Phantom V4's 5. In the Author's Category Battle, the TEVERUN SPACE gets 24 ✅ versus 26 ✅ for APOLLO Phantom V4 (with a few ties sprinkled in).

Totals: TEVERUN SPACE scores 29, APOLLO Phantom V4 scores 31.

Based on the scoring, the APOLLO Phantom V4 is our overall winner. For me, the TEVERUN SPACE is the scooter that simply makes more sense - it rides beautifully, looks fantastic, and gives you that dual-motor thrill without demanding a second mortgage or a weightlifting routine. The Phantom V4 is impressive in its own right, a serious, long-legged machine that will absolutely delight riders who crave extra speed and range, but it feels more like a deliberate indulgence than a rational daily choice. If you want a scooter that you'll actually enjoy every day - not just on the rare occasion you can stretch its legs - the SPACE is the one I'd happily keep by the front door. The Phantom, for all its strengths, is the one I'd visit in the garage when I felt like being a bit ridiculous.

That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.