Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
The UNAGI Model One is the overall winner here: it's faster, stronger on hills, better finished, and far more grown-up as a daily urban tool, even if you do pay a premium for the privilege. The RAZOR Raven makes sense mainly as a light-duty, flat-ground scooter for teens and very light adults who want something cheap, simple and reasonably sturdy for short fun rides. Choose the Unagi if you care about reliable commuting, design and portability; choose the Raven if your budget is tight, your expectations are modest, and you (or your kid) mostly ride around the block rather than across town.
If you want the full picture - including how both feel after a week of real riding, not just spec-sheet fantasy - read on.
Electric scooters have split into two worlds: serious urban tools and dressed-up toys. The UNAGI Model One sits firmly in the first camp, trying to be the slick, boardroom-ready gadget that just happens to get you to the office. The RAZOR Raven, on the other hand, is very much a gateway drug into e-scooters - aimed at teens and light riders who want some buzz without terrifying their parents.
I've spent time with both on real city streets and rougher backroads than either marketing department would approve of. One feels like a slim, over-engineered design project that happens to move; the other like a nostalgic Razor that's been given a battery and told to behave. One is a commuter's companion, the other a weekend toy that can moonlight as transport if you don't ask too much of it.
Let's break down where they shine, where they annoy, and which one you'll still want to ride after the novelty wears off.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
On paper, these two shouldn't be rivals: the Unagi costs several times more than the Raven and clearly aims at the "urban professional" crowd, while Razor built the Raven for teenagers and lighter adults who mostly stay in the neighbourhood. But they overlap more than you'd think in the real world.
Both are very light scooters, both fold quickly, both are pitched as "last-mile" and short-trip machines, and both target riders who don't want to drag a heavy, monstrous commuter up the stairs. If you're simply asking, "I need something light I can carry and ride a few kilometres - what should I buy?", these two often land on the same shortlist.
The question is: do you pay up for the sleek, dual-motor, design-driven Unagi, or save a big chunk of cash with the simpler, softer-punching Razor?
Design & Build Quality
Pick up the UNAGI Model One and it feels like a tech product first, scooter second. The tapered carbon-fibre stem, magnesium handlebar, single-piece deck and hidden cabling make it look more like something from a design museum than a bike shop. The finish is genuinely high-end: paint that doesn't look like it'll peel after one winter, rubberised deck instead of scruffy grip tape, and a folding hinge that clicks shut with more confidence than many far pricier "performance" scooters.
The RAZOR Raven goes for a very different vibe. The steel frame and fork give it a familiar, almost old-school ruggedness - like a beefed-up version of the classic Razor kick scooter you probably used to crack your shins with. It does feel solid, but also a bit more agricultural. Plastics are more obvious, cable routing is less elegant, and the whole thing says "good value toy/tool" rather than "premium gadget". Functional, yes. Aspirational, not really.
In the hands, the Unagi feels tight and rattle-free, like everything has been machined to fit. The Raven feels sturdy enough, but you're more aware of its price point: joints, levers and plastics are clearly built to a budget. Fine for a teen's beater scooter; a little less convincing if you're trying to replace a daily commute.
Ride Comfort & Handling
This is where the design philosophies collide head-on. The Unagi rolls on small solid tyres with no suspension. On fresh tarmac or smooth bike paths, it feels razor-sharp: quick steering, very direct, and almost effortless to thread through gaps in traffic. The moment the surface turns to cracked pavement or cobblestones, the romance ends. You feel every ridge through the stiff stem and bars, and after a few kilometres on rough city patches your hands and knees will be reminding you of your life choices.
The Raven goes for the "mullet" setup: fat air-filled tyre up front, smaller solid tyre at the back. That big front pneumatic wheel does a lot of heavy lifting. On the same battered sidewalk where the Unagi had me dancing around every crack, the Raven's front end simply rolls through with a respectable amount of comfort. You still feel bumps through the rear, especially sharp edges, but the overall ride is noticeably calmer and more forgiving.
Handling-wise, the Unagi is the more agile of the two. The low weight and compact wheelbase make it easy to flick around, and the dual motors help it feel planted mid-corner, provided the surface is smooth. The Raven feels more like a relaxed cruiser: the large front wheel adds stability, the steel frame has a bit of natural flex, and the steering is calmer. It's easier on nervous or younger riders, but less exciting if you're used to something sharper.
Performance
The first time you launch the UNAGI Model One in its punchiest mode, it's hard not to grin. With a motor in each wheel, it surges away from standstill in a way you don't expect from such a slim scooter. Off the lights, you leave bicycle traffic behind without much effort, and on moderate hills the Unagi keeps pushing where most lightweight scooters start gasping. It's not a street-racer, but for its size it feels lively and confident, and it holds its regulated top speed on the flat without drama.
Braking, though fully electronic with a backup fender brake, has that typical "simulated" feel. The electronic system slows you smoothly and predictably once you're used to it, but there's less mechanical bite than a good disc brake. In emergency stops, you'll instinctively stamp that rear fender as well, and you're very aware of those small tyres when scrubbing speed quickly.
Jumping onto the RAZOR Raven immediately resets your expectations. The motor is modest; acceleration in its sportiest mode is sprightly for a light teen rider, but if you're an adult you won't be mistaking it for a commuter-grade powertrain. It gets up to its top speed in a relaxed, friendly way, perfectly fine for park paths and campus lanes, but it feels out of its depth if you try to mix with faster city traffic.
On hills, the difference is stark. Where the Unagi will at least fight up a decent incline with some dignity, the Raven quickly runs out of enthusiasm and starts begging for manual kicks, particularly if you're anywhere near its upper weight limit. It's honest scooter physics: low-power motor, low voltage system, pleasant on flats, deeply unimpressed by gradients.
Razor's electronic brake plus fender combo works well enough at the speeds it reaches, and the large front wheel helps stability when braking. But again, this is tuned for casual use; it doesn't inspire the same "I can stop from anything" confidence you expect on a proper urban commuter.
Battery & Range
Unagi claims a respectable-sounding maximum range for the Model One, but out in the wild - especially on the dual-motor version and in its liveliest mode - you'll hit the limit significantly sooner. For a reasonably sized adult riding briskly in mixed city conditions, you're realistically looking at a short hop each way with a comfortable buffer, not a half-day tour. Treat it as a compact city shuttle and it makes sense; try to stretch it into long cross-town missions and you'll find yourself eyeing the battery gauge a bit too often.
The Razor Raven's battery situation is similar conceptually but scaled down to its target use. Advertised runtime in its gentlest mode sounds impressive until you translate that into real kilometres in the faster mode that anyone with a pulse will actually use. In practice, you're good for neighbourhood loops, campus commuting and quick runs to the shop, but you wouldn't plan a longer urban commute around it without access to a charger at the other end.
Both scooters take roughly a working afternoon or overnight to go from empty to full. The Unagi's pack and management system feel a notch more sophisticated, with better long-term care for the cells, but neither is pretending to be an endurance machine. The main difference is this: on the Unagi, the limited range is the main compromise of an otherwise capable commuter; on the Raven, the range matches its intended "short fun ride" life perfectly, but falls short if you try to push it into adult-commuter duty.
Portability & Practicality
Here, both scooters actually play in the same league - and are both good, in different ways. The Unagi is feather-light for a dual-motor machine, and the slim carbon stem makes it genuinely easy to grab and carry one-handed up a flight of stairs or onto a train. The "one-click" folding joint is one of the best in the industry: fast, secure, and refreshingly free of clunky clamps and stem wobble. It disappears neatly under a desk or beside a café table. If your commute involves a lot of carrying and folding, this matters more than raw power or range.
The Raven is only a touch heavier but still firmly in the "you can carry this without swearing" category. Its folding latch is more basic but gets the job done. Folded, it's compact enough for a dorm room, car boot or classroom corner. For teens and students, it's absolutely manageable. For office workers in suits, the slightly toy-ish stance and exposed cabling make it less "boardroom accessory" and more "I borrowed my kid's scooter", but practically speaking it's easy to live with.
Where practicality diverges is in load and robustness under adult use. The Unagi is built for full-size riders and heavier loads, even if it doesn't have the biggest battery. The Raven is explicitly tuned for lighter bodies. Put a big backpack and an adult frame on it, and you feel it: slower starts, laboured hill attempts, and a sense that you're pushing the design outside its comfort zone.
Safety
Neither scooter is unsafe per se, but they take very different routes to safety. The Unagi leans on its dual electronic braking system, decent integrated lighting and puncture-proof tyres that will never leave you stranded from a blow-out. The low weight and compact form factor make it easy to manoeuvre around hazards, but the combination of small solid wheels and no suspension means you must stay hyper-vigilant about poor surfaces. Hit a deep pothole you didn't see, and you'll feel it.
The Raven plays it more conservatively. Power is limited to a sensible level, there's a kick-to-start system so it can't shoot away from a standing start, and you get UL certification on the electrical system - not glamorous, but comforting if this is going to live in your teenager's bedroom. The big front wheel adds stability at its modest top speed, and the dual braking options are intuitive for newcomers.
Lighting is more adult-ready on the Unagi, with both front and rear integration, although the scooter's low profile still demands some defensive riding in traffic. The Raven's front headlight is a welcome inclusion for a budget machine, but the overall visibility package is more "suburban dusk ride" than "serious city commuting in the dark".
Community Feedback
| UNAGI Model One | RAZOR Raven |
|---|---|
What riders love
|
What riders love
|
What riders complain about
|
What riders complain about
|
Price & Value
Let's address the elephant in the room: the Unagi costs several times more than the Raven. If you reduce scooters to "battery size and top speed per euro", the Unagi loses that particular spreadsheet battle fairly quickly. You can find bigger batteries and even suspension at similar or lower prices. With the Unagi, you're clearly paying for design, materials and portability polish, not just raw numbers.
The thing is, if you actually intend to use your scooter daily for commuting, those "soft" qualities matter. The Unagi is easier to carry, more powerful for adult riders, and simply more pleasant to look at and live with. Over a couple of years of regular use, that premium starts to feel a bit more justifiable - provided your rides are short enough that the modest range doesn't bite you.
The Razor Raven, by contrast, is aggressively priced. For what you pay, you get a decent-quality steel frame, a surprisingly comfy front end, and a reputable brand name. As a teen's first e-scooter or an occasional runabout, the value is clear. As a serious adult commuting tool, the value evaporates quickly once you hit its power and load limits. It's good value for what it is; it's not a cheaper substitute for a proper commuter like the Unagi, no matter how tempting the price tag looks.
Service & Parts Availability
Unagi has built a reputation for decent customer service, particularly in bigger markets, and the Model One benefits from that. You're dealing with a brand that actually designed its own scooter, not just rebranded an anonymous frame, which usually means better support for specific parts like that unique folding hinge or the integrated electronics. The flip side is that it's not very tinkerer-friendly - you won't be easily swapping in third-party components.
Razor, meanwhile, is the cockroach of the scooter world - in the best sense. They've been around forever, their stuff is in big-box stores, and spares like chargers and basic components are relatively easy to source. For a family who just needs a working scooter and the option to replace a broken lever without emailing three factories, that matters. More obscure bits can still be a pain, but at least the brand will almost certainly still exist in a few years.
Pros & Cons Summary
| UNAGI Model One | RAZOR Raven | |
|---|---|---|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | UNAGI Model One | RAZOR Raven |
|---|---|---|
| Motor power (rated) | 500 W (2 x 250 W) | 170 W rear hub |
| Top speed | 25 km/h (unlockable ~32 km/h) | 19 km/h (Sport) |
| Advertised max range | 24,95 km | 17 km |
| Realistic range (approx.) | 12-16 km (mixed use) | 10-12 km (Sport, mixed use) |
| Battery energy | 281 Wh | ≈ 187 Wh (21,6 V Li-ion, est.) |
| Weight | 12,02 kg | 12,15 kg |
| Brakes | Dual electronic E-ABS + rear fender | Hand electronic + rear fender |
| Suspension | None (solid tyres with air pockets) | No springs; pneumatic front, solid rear |
| Tyres | 7,5" solid rubber | 10" pneumatic front, 6,7" solid rear |
| Max load | 125 kg | 70 kg |
| IP rating | Not specified | Not specified |
| Charging time | 4-5 h | ≈ 4-6 h (est.) |
| Price | ≈ 955 € | ≈ 266 € |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
If you strip away the marketing and the nostalgia, the UNAGI Model One is the only one of these two that truly works as a serious adult commuting scooter - within its limitations. You get proper power for city speeds, realistic hill ability, a genuinely portable package, and a design that won't look out of place next to a MacBook in a glass-and-steel office. You do pay a premium, and you must accept short real-world range and a firm ride. If your daily trips are modest in distance and mostly on decent surfaces, it's a refined, low-maintenance way to move around the city.
The RAZOR Raven, in contrast, is best understood as a well-made, budget recreational scooter that can occasionally pretend to be transport on short, flat routes. For a teenager or light student buzzing around campus, it makes a lot of sense: it's cheap to buy, simple to use, easy to carry, and smoother over rough patches than many solid-tyre cheapies. But if you're an adult commuter expecting it to replace buses or bikes, you'll bump into its power, load and range limits fairly quickly.
So: if you're an urban professional, regular commuter, or design-conscious rider who values portability and polish more than sheer spec sheet, the Unagi is the sensible - if not perfect - choice here. If you're equipping a teen, shopping on a tight budget, or just want a low-risk way to dip your toes into electric riding for short fun trips, the Raven will do the job without emptying your wallet. Just don't confuse it with a grown-up scooter because it has a headlight and a folding stem.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | UNAGI Model One | RAZOR Raven |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ❌ 3,40 €/Wh | ✅ 1,42 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ❌ 38,20 €/km/h | ✅ 14,00 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ✅ 42,78 g/Wh | ❌ 64,97 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | ✅ 0,48 kg/km/h | ❌ 0,64 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ❌ 68,21 €/km | ✅ 24,18 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ✅ 0,86 kg/km | ❌ 1,10 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ❌ 20,10 Wh/km | ✅ 17,00 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ✅ 20,00 W/km/h | ❌ 8,90 W/km/h |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | ✅ 0,024 kg/W | ❌ 0,071 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ✅ 62,40 W | ❌ 37,40 W |
These metrics look strictly at maths, not feelings. Price-per-Wh and price-per-km/h highlight how much raw "energy" or "speed" you buy for each euro. Weight-per-Wh and weight-per-km/h tell you how efficiently each scooter uses its kilos to deliver capacity and speed. Price-per-km of real-world range and weight-per-km show what each kilometre effectively "costs" in money and mass. Wh-per-km reveals energy efficiency on the road. Power-to-speed and weight-to-power show how muscular or strained each scooter is at its top speed, and average charging speed simply indicates how fast the battery refills relative to its size.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | UNAGI Model One | RAZOR Raven |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ✅ Slightly lighter, better carry | ❌ Similar, less ergonomic |
| Range | ✅ More usable for adults | ❌ Short and rider-sensitive |
| Max Speed | ✅ Faster, commuter friendly | ❌ Slower, play focused |
| Power | ✅ Dual motors, strong pull | ❌ Weak, flat-only feel |
| Battery Size | ✅ Larger, more headroom | ❌ Smaller pack |
| Suspension | ❌ None, harsh on rough | ✅ Front tyre softens hits |
| Design | ✅ Premium, sleek, integrated | ❌ Functional, slightly toyish |
| Safety | ✅ Better power, lights, load | ❌ Underpowered for adults |
| Practicality | ✅ Daily commuter capable | ❌ Mainly short fun hops |
| Comfort | ❌ Harsh on bad surfaces | ✅ Smoother typical pavement |
| Features | ✅ Dual motors, integrated dash | ❌ Basic, few frills |
| Serviceability | ❌ Closed, proprietary bits | ✅ Simple, common parts |
| Customer Support | ✅ Strong direct support | ✅ Big-box friendly returns |
| Fun Factor | ✅ Punchy, zippy acceleration | ❌ Tame once novelty fades |
| Build Quality | ✅ Tight, premium construction | ❌ Solid but budget feel |
| Component Quality | ✅ Higher-grade materials | ❌ More plastic, cheaper bits |
| Brand Name | ✅ Premium, design-led image | ✅ Huge mainstream recognition |
| Community | ✅ Enthusiast, design-focused | ❌ Less serious rider base |
| Lights (visibility) | ✅ Front and rear integrated | ❌ Front only, basic |
| Lights (illumination) | ✅ Decent for city pace | ❌ Adequate, nothing more |
| Acceleration | ✅ Strong for size, dual | ❌ Modest, teen-oriented |
| Arrive with smile factor | ✅ More exciting, lively | ❌ Fun but limited |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ❌ Jiggly on rough roads | ✅ Softer, calmer ride |
| Charging speed | ✅ Faster for its capacity | ❌ Slower refill |
| Reliability | ✅ Solid, few moving parts | ✅ Simple, proven brand |
| Folded practicality | ✅ Very compact, clean | ❌ Bulkier, less refined |
| Ease of transport | ✅ Slim stem, easy carry | ❌ More awkward in hand |
| Handling | ✅ Agile, nimble steering | ❌ Safe but duller |
| Braking performance | ✅ Dual e-brake plus fender | ❌ Adequate for low speed |
| Riding position | ❌ Short deck restricts stance | ✅ Suits smaller riders |
| Handlebar quality | ✅ Magnesium, integrated display | ❌ Basic steel and plastic |
| Throttle response | ✅ Smooth, nicely tuned | ❌ Can be jerky |
| Dashboard / Display | ✅ Clean, bright integration | ❌ Simple, utilitarian |
| Security (locking) | ❌ Premium, theft-attractive | ✅ Less attractive to thieves |
| Weather protection | ❌ Fair-weather, no clear IP | ❌ Same, avoid heavy rain |
| Resale value | ✅ Stronger brand desirability | ❌ Budget product, lower |
| Tuning potential | ❌ Closed system, limited mods | ❌ Not worth heavy modding |
| Ease of maintenance | ✅ No flats, no cable brakes | ✅ Simple, cheap to fix |
| Value for Money | ❌ Expensive per Wh and km | ✅ Strong value in its niche |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the UNAGI Model One scores 6 points against the RAZOR Raven's 4. In the Author's Category Battle, the UNAGI Model One gets 30 ✅ versus 11 ✅ for RAZOR Raven (with a few ties sprinkled in).
Totals: UNAGI Model One scores 36, RAZOR Raven scores 15.
Based on the scoring, the UNAGI Model One is our overall winner. Between these two, the UNAGI Model One is the scooter that feels like a complete, grown-up product - the one you can actually build a daily routine around, even if you'll occasionally curse it on cobblestones. The RAZOR Raven has its charm, especially for younger and lighter riders, but it never really escapes the shadow of being a budget, light-duty machine. If you want something that will make every short city hop feel a bit sharper and more intentional, the Unagi is the one you'll keep reaching for. The Raven is the scooter you buy to see if you like the idea of electric riding; the Unagi is the one you buy when you've decided you do.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.

