Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
If you want the safer long-term bet with proven reliability, better community support and more rounded road manners, the Xiaomi M365 is the overall winner here. It feels more sorted as a commuter scooter, even if none of its individual numbers are particularly spectacular these days.
The KuKirin HX is the better pick only if the removable battery is a game-changer for you - for example, you absolutely cannot charge the scooter where you park it, or you plan to juggle multiple batteries. In that very specific use case, its modular design can outweigh its more budget-y rough edges.
Everyone else is generally better served by the M365's more mature ecosystem, predictable handling and easier long-term ownership. Keep reading if you want the full, road-tested story rather than just the brochure version.
Stick around - the interesting bits start where the marketing blurbs stop.
Electric scooters have grown up fast. A few years ago, the Xiaomi M365 was practically the only sensible answer to "which scooter should I buy?" - it was the template everyone copied. Today, lighter frames, removable batteries and aggressive pricing from brands like KuKirin are trying very hard to knock it off that pedestal.
Enter the KuKirin HX: a compact commuter with its battery stuffed into the stem like a thermos flask, promising fast charging, easy swaps and no more dragging a dripping-wet scooter through the office lobby. On paper, it even undercuts the Xiaomi on price while offering a punchier motor.
The M365 is for riders who want something proven, fixable and predictable. The HX is for people who obsess over plug sockets and staircases more than peak wattage charts. Both look similar at a distance - slim commuters on air tyres - but they solve daily life in very different ways.
Let's dig into where each one shines, where they creak, and which compromises are actually worth living with.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
These two live in the same broad neighbourhood: compact, single-motor city scooters aimed at commuters who care more about not missing a train than impressing anyone with wheelspin.
The Xiaomi M365 sits at the upper end of "budget sensible". It's the scooter you still see in bike lanes years after purchase, usually with a slightly battered mudguard and a proud owner who's on their third rear tyre but still smiling.
The KuKirin HX dives harder on headline value: more rated motor power, removable battery, and a noticeably lower purchase price. On spec sheets and online listings, it's precisely the sort of scooter someone glances at instead of the "old" M365 and thinks, "why would I pay more for the Xiaomi?"
They share the same general format - front hub motor, air tyres, no real suspension - which makes comparing them fair. But their design philosophy is very different: Xiaomi optimised for mass-market robustness; KuKirin optimised for flexibility and price. That difference becomes very obvious once you've spent a few hundred kilometres on each.
Design & Build Quality
Pick up the M365 and it still feels... sorted. The aluminium frame has that slightly overbuilt, "designed by engineers who were a bit paranoid" vibe. Welds are neat, the matte finish hides abuse, and the cable routing is tidy. It looks like a single object rather than a parts catalogue on wheels. Nothing screams premium, but nothing screams bargain bin either.
On the KuKirin HX, the first thing you notice is the chunky stem. It has to be thick to swallow the removable battery, and visually it gives the scooter a more industrial, utilitarian look. The deck is pleasantly slim because it no longer has to house cells, which is a nice touch - it actually looks quite lean from the side.
In the hands, though, the differences show. The HX's frame and latch feel acceptable rather than confidence-inspiring. The folding joint is beefy, but you can tell this is an area where tolerances and bolt tension matter - and riders do report periodic stem wobble if you don't stay on top of it. It's not disastrous, but it doesn't quite have the "set and forget" solidity you get from a well-maintained M365.
Ergonomically, Xiaomi keeps it extremely clean: minimal display, good grips, simple layout. The HX adds a more modern cockpit with a screen and familiar Kugoo-style controls, but the execution feels more "budget gadget" than "refined transport". It works, but you're not under any illusion about what you paid.
Ride Comfort & Handling
Neither of these scooters has real suspension. Your shock absorbers are your legs and the air in the tyres. That said, they don't ride identically.
The M365 has its battery pack in the deck, which drops the centre of gravity nicely. On smooth tarmac and halfway decent bike paths it feels planted and predictable; you lean into corners and the scooter obediently follows without wanting to flop or stand up mid-turn. On broken pavement or coarse cobbles, your knees and wrists definitely know about it, but the chassis at least behaves itself while you're being rattled.
The KuKirin HX shifts most of the weight up into the stem. At slow speeds you notice that top-heaviness immediately - the steering feels a bit heavier and slightly "pendulum-y" until your brain recalibrates. Once you're rolling at a steady pace it calms down, and the pneumatic tyres do a decent job of taking the sting out of smaller bumps. The deck is slightly higher off the ground relative to your feet, which helps counter that tall stem but doesn't entirely hide it.
On long, straight commutes the two are broadly similar: both cruisy enough if the surface is kind, both fatiguing if your city planners have a cobblestone fetish. When it gets really rough, the Xiaomi's lower mass centre and slightly more cohesive chassis make it easier to keep a steady line - the HX never feels dangerous, but it feels more like a lightweight scooter with a big lump perched on the front.
Performance
The KuKirin HX has the stronger-on-paper motor, and you do feel that extra shove. From a standstill it pulls a little more eagerly than the Xiaomi, especially if you're closer to its upper weight limit. It gets up to its restricted top speed briskly and then just stays there, humming along without much drama. For flat-city riders, it's perfectly adequate.
The M365, with its more modest rated power, feels gentler off the line. It still has that pleasant "lean and go" acceleration typical of early Xiaomi scooters, but if you jump between the two back-to-back, the HX does feel livelier initially. Where the M365 quietly redeems itself is in how predictable that power is. The mapping is conservative but very consistent; you don't get weird surges or hesitation, just a linear build of speed until you hit its limiter.
On hills neither is a hero. The HX copes slightly better with moderate slopes and lighter riders, but put a heavy rider on a proper climb and you'll quickly discover the limits of small motors and commuter gearing. The M365 struggles more obviously on steeper stuff; you'll sometimes find yourself doing the dignified "kick assist" routine to stop it bogging down.
Braking is an area where both are actually fairly good for their class. The Xiaomi combines rear disc and front regen into a single lever; once dialled in, the feel is progressive and confidence-inspiring. The HX gives you rear disc plus front electronic braking as well, and absolute stopping power is on par. The difference is in refinement: the M365's system, while not perfect, feels like it's been tuned and tested for years; the HX's braking mix is more purely functional.
Battery & Range
On claimed figures, both talk about roughly the same maximum range. In reality, they also land in a similar ballpark for a typical lightweight rider going at realistic commuter speeds. Push either flat-out in mixed city terrain and you're looking at a comfortable one-way ride for most people, maybe there and back if your distances are modest and you're not playing drag racer away from lights.
The M365's deck-integrated battery has two notable advantages: weight distribution and proven longevity. Xiaomi and Ninebot's battery management is pretty mature, and there's a mountain of real-world data from people who've put absurd mileage on these packs. Range tapers as they age, but they don't usually fall off a cliff overnight if treated half sensibly.
The KuKirin HX counters with the trump card of a removable battery. On a single pack, its real-world range isn't dramatic - perfectly usable, not spectacular. But the ability to throw a spare in your backpack and double your practical day range in ten seconds is legitimately useful. It also means that when the battery does age out, you're buying a new pack, not performing surgery on the scooter or retiring it prematurely.
Charging speed nudges in the HX's favour: the smaller pack and slightly shorter charge time mean that a full from-empty top-up fits neatly inside a normal office day or a long lunch break. The Xiaomi isn't exactly glacial, but it's more of an overnight or afternoon-into-evening proposition from low state of charge.
Portability & Practicality
Both scooters sit in that rare weight range you can actually carry without questioning your life choices. The M365 is a touch lighter and feels well balanced in the hand - the famous bell-hook folding system might be simple, but it keeps things compact and easy to grab. Up a couple of flights of stairs or onto a train, it's absolutely manageable.
The KuKirin HX is technically only a bit heavier, but because more of its mass lives in the stem, carrying it feels different. Hold it by the stem and the front end wants to dive; you have to find the balance point and get used to its see-saw tendencies. It's still "carryable", just less elegant than the Xiaomi when you're juggling it with a bag and a coffee.
In daily use, the HX claws back points with the detachable battery. Living in a building with no lift and no plug near your bike storage? Being able to lock the "dead" scooter downstairs and take only the battery upstairs is genuinely liberating. With the M365, the whole muddy, rain-splattered unit has to come inside if you want to charge it.
Storage wise, both fold down small enough for under-desk duty or the boot of a small car. Kickstands are adequate, if not works of art. The Xiaomi's ecosystem advantage appears again in the form of countless hooks, racks and wall mounts designed specifically for its frame; with the HX, you're more in DIY territory.
Safety
Safety on small scooters is a mix of braking, grip, lighting and - frankly - how predictable the thing feels when it does something unexpected.
The M365 sets a strong baseline. Dual braking with electronic ABS on the front, a decent-enough front light and a flashing tail light when you brake. On dry urban asphalt the 8,5-inch air tyres grip well; in the wet, they're as good as you can reasonably expect at this size. The low battery-in-deck layout helps when you're dodging potholes or emergency-braking from top speed because a car door appeared where no car door should be.
The KuKirin HX doesn't disgrace itself here either. You get a bright, high-mounted headlight that actually throws light down the road instead of apologetically illuminating the front tyre, and a responsive rear light that wakes up under braking. Same tyre size, same basic braking layout. The higher centre of gravity, however, means that panic manoeuvres can feel a bit more dramatic; the chassis is stable enough, but you're more aware that you're perched on top of a stick with a brick in it.
Both scooters rely heavily on rider vigilance for potholes and tram tracks; neither tyre size is forgiving of deep road defects. Between the two, the Xiaomi's more settled geometry makes it the one I'd rather be on when something unexpected happens at speed.
Community Feedback
| Xiaomi M365 | KuKirin HX |
|---|---|
| What riders love: proven reliability, huge modding community, easy access to every spare part imaginable, familiar handling, and brakes that just quietly do their job. | What riders love: removable battery convenience, light weight for the price, decent ride from pneumatic tyres, good water resistance around the battery, and the feeling of getting "a lot" for the money. |
| What riders complain about: nightmare tyre changes, occasional stem wobble if not maintained, fragile rear mudguard, no true suspension, and limited climbing power for heavier riders or steep cities. | What riders complain about: stem bolts working loose and causing wobble, slightly top-heavy steering, optimistic range claims, buggy app and dim display in direct sun, plus a general need to keep an eye on fasteners. |
Price & Value
On sticker price alone, the KuKirin HX looks like a bargain. It undercuts the Xiaomi quite noticeably while offering a stronger rated motor and the party trick of a removable battery. For someone on a strict budget who just wants something light to get from A to B, that's compelling.
The M365 costs more, especially new - though on the used market it often drifts into very tempting territory. What you're paying for, fundamentally, is refinement and ecosystem. The value isn't in one killer spec; it's in the fact that five years from now, you'll still find cheap fenders, replacement controllers, tutorials and probably a neighbour who has already fixed whatever you've just broken.
Over a longer ownership horizon, that support network, plus predictable battery behaviour and strong resale, narrows - and can effectively reverse - the apparent price gap. The HX can absolutely be good value, but you have to be realistic about what you're getting: clever design and decent hardware wrapped in a package that relies more on your mechanical sympathy and less on decades of refinement.
Service & Parts Availability
This is where the M365 quietly steamrollers most competitors. Pretty much every component, down to plastic covers and rubber grommets, is available from multiple vendors. Need a new controller? There are several versions. Want to upgrade your brake, add suspension, or swap in a fresh deck? There's a cottage industry devoted solely to that.
Official Xiaomi service can be hit and miss by region, but the unofficial ecosystem is massive. Any half-decent independent repair shop knows its way around an M365 blindfolded and upside down.
The KuKirin HX benefits from KuKirin's growing European presence, and common wear items - tyres, tubes, basic hardware - are easy enough to source. The removable battery is a double-edged sword: great because it's user-replaceable, but you are dependent on the brand keeping that specific form factor available. For structural or electronic parts, you're more at the mercy of specific resellers, and long-term parts continuity isn't as guaranteed as with the Xiaomi workhorse.
Pros & Cons Summary
| Xiaomi M365 | KuKirin HX |
|---|---|
Pros:
|
Pros:
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | Xiaomi M365 | KuKirin HX |
|---|---|---|
| Rated motor power | 250 W front hub | 350 W front hub |
| Top speed (region-limited) | ca. 25 km/h | ca. 25 km/h |
| Stated range | ca. 30 km | ca. 30 km |
| Real-world range (est.) | ca. 20 km | ca. 17 km |
| Battery capacity | 280 Wh (integrated) | ca. 230 Wh (removable) |
| Weight | 12,5 kg | 13 kg |
| Brakes | Rear disc + front regen (E-ABS) | Rear disc + front regen (E-ABS) + rear fender brake |
| Suspension | None (pneumatic tyres only) | None (pneumatic tyres only) |
| Tyres | 8,5" pneumatic | 8,5" pneumatic tubeless |
| Max load | 100 kg | 120 kg |
| IP rating | IP54 (whole scooter) | IP54 (battery well protected) |
| Charging time | ca. 5 h | ca. 4 h |
| Price (approx.) | 467 € | 299 € |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
If you strip away the marketing and look at how these two feel after a few hundred kilometres of real use, the Xiaomi M365 comes out as the more complete, "liveable" scooter. It doesn't excel in any single headline number, but it rarely lets you down: handling is composed, braking is trustworthy, the battery behaves, and if (when) something breaks, you can usually fix it with cheap parts and a YouTube video.
The KuKirin HX is clever, but also more conditional. If you're an apartment dweller with no power outlet anywhere near your parking spot, or you absolutely need to swap batteries on the go, its removable pack is a genuinely powerful argument. For that kind of rider, it's the more convenient tool - provided you're willing to do occasional bolt-tightening and accept that it feels a bit more like a well-built gadget than a long-term workhorse.
For everyone else - especially riders who want a scooter to quietly get on with the job for years, and who value a deep pool of parts and knowledge - the M365 remains the safer, more rounded choice. It may be ageing, and it's certainly not glamorous, but it's still the scooter I'd rather bet my daily commute on.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | Xiaomi M365 | KuKirin HX |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ❌ 1,67 €/Wh | ✅ 1,30 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ❌ 18,68 €/km/h | ✅ 11,96 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ✅ 44,64 g/Wh | ❌ 56,52 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | ✅ 0,50 kg/km/h | ❌ 0,52 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ❌ 23,35 €/km | ✅ 17,59 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ✅ 0,63 kg/km | ❌ 0,76 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ❌ 14,00 Wh/km | ✅ 13,53 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ❌ 10,00 W/km/h | ✅ 14,00 W/km/h |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | ❌ 0,05 kg/W | ✅ 0,04 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ❌ 56,00 W | ✅ 57,50 W |
These metrics look purely at how efficiently each scooter turns money, weight, power and battery capacity into speed and range. Lower "per Wh" or "per km" figures mean you're getting more utility for each euro or kilogram; better Wh/km shows which scooter sips energy more gently. Ratios involving power show how much motor grunt you get for your top speed and total weight, while average charging speed tells you how quickly each battery can be refilled in practice.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | Xiaomi M365 | KuKirin HX |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ✅ Slightly lighter, better balance | ❌ Heavier, top-heavy carry |
| Range | ✅ More real range per charge | ❌ Shorter on single battery |
| Max Speed | 🤝 ✅ Same legal top speed | 🤝 ✅ Same legal top speed |
| Power | ❌ Softer, weaker on hills | ✅ Punchier acceleration overall |
| Battery Size | ✅ Larger integrated capacity | ❌ Smaller single-pack size |
| Suspension | 🤝 ❌ No suspension at all | 🤝 ❌ No suspension either |
| Design | ✅ Cleaner, more cohesive look | ❌ Chunky stem, utilitarian feel |
| Safety | ✅ More settled at speed | ❌ Top-heavy, needs attention |
| Practicality | ❌ Must bring whole scooter in | ✅ Removable battery convenience |
| Comfort | ✅ Lower CG, calmer ride | ❌ Slightly nervous front end |
| Features | ❌ Very basic display, options | ✅ More modern cockpit features |
| Serviceability | ✅ Every part easily sourced | ❌ More limited parts access |
| Customer Support | 🤝 ❌ Patchy official support | 🤝 ❌ Reseller-dependent quality |
| Fun Factor | ✅ Nimble, confidence-inspiring | ❌ Slightly gadget-like feel |
| Build Quality | ✅ More refined overall | ❌ Acceptable, but feels budget |
| Component Quality | ✅ Better proven electronics | ❌ Adequate, less proven long term |
| Brand Name | ✅ Stronger, well-known brand | ❌ Lesser-known to mainstream |
| Community | ✅ Massive global user base | ❌ Smaller, more fragmented |
| Lights (visibility) | ✅ Decent, widely tested setup | ❌ OK but less consistent |
| Lights (illumination) | ❌ Adequate, not exceptional | ✅ Higher, better throw |
| Acceleration | ❌ Softer, slower off line | ✅ Stronger, livelier start |
| Arrive with smile factor | ✅ Feels reassuring and playful | ❌ More appliance than companion |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ✅ Predictable, low-stress ride | ❌ Needs more attention, checks |
| Charging speed | ❌ Slower charge per Wh | ✅ Slightly quicker turnaround |
| Reliability | ✅ Long, proven track record | ❌ More mixed long-term reports |
| Folded practicality | ✅ Compact, easy to grab | ❌ Front-heavy when folded |
| Ease of transport | ✅ Better balance on stairs | ❌ Awkward stem-heavy carry |
| Handling | ✅ More neutral, confidence-inspiring | ❌ Top-heavy, heavier steering |
| Braking performance | ✅ More refined brake feel | ❌ Effective but less polished |
| Riding position | ✅ Natural, well-sorted geometry | ❌ Slightly awkward front weight |
| Handlebar quality | ✅ Solid, simple, proven | ❌ Feels more budget-grade |
| Throttle response | ✅ Linear, predictable mapping | ❌ Less refined modulation |
| Dashboard/Display | ❌ Minimal info, dated | ✅ More data, modern style |
| Security (locking) | ❌ Needs physical lock always | ✅ Remove battery as deterrent |
| Weather protection | ✅ Decent, low battery placement | ✅ Battery high, well sealed |
| Resale value | ✅ Strong used-market demand | ❌ Lower brand recognition |
| Tuning potential | ✅ Huge firmware, parts scene | ❌ Limited mods, smaller scene |
| Ease of maintenance | ✅ Documented fixes for everything | ❌ More DIY discovery needed |
| Value for Money | ✅ Better long-term ownership value | ❌ Cheaper, but more compromises |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the XIAOMI M365 scores 3 points against the KUGOO KuKirin HX's 7. In the Author's Category Battle, the XIAOMI M365 gets 29 ✅ versus 10 ✅ for KUGOO KuKirin HX.
Totals: XIAOMI M365 scores 32, KUGOO KuKirin HX scores 17.
Based on the scoring, the XIAOMI M365 is our overall winner. Between these two, the Xiaomi M365 simply feels like the more complete, confidence-inspiring scooter to live with day in, day out. It may be ageing, and it certainly won't impress your friends on raw specs, but it rides in a calmer, more predictable way and sits on a foundation of real-world experience that the KuKirin HX just can't match yet. The HX counters with clever tricks and a tempting price, and for a very specific kind of rider that removable battery can be a genuine lifesaver. But if I had to pick one to depend on for a long commute season after season, the M365 is the one I'd quietly wheel out of the garage every morning.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.

