Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
The Xiaomi M365 takes the overall win here: it rides more naturally, stops more confidently, goes further in the real world, and sits inside a massive ecosystem of parts, fixes and tweaks that keep it alive for years. The Razor E Prime III counters with lower weight and a slightly punchier top-speed feel, but compromises on range, comfort at the rear wheel, and long-term value once you look past the spec sheet. Choose the Razor if your absolute priority is carrying the scooter a lot and you have a short, mostly flat commute. Everyone else will generally be happier - and better supported - on the old Xiaomi workhorse.
If you want to know which one will still feel like a good decision a year from now, read on - the devil, as always, lives in the details.
In the lightweight commuter world, the Xiaomi M365 is the old celebrity neighbour: you've seen it everywhere, you've heard all the stories, and somehow it's still going to work every morning. Razor's E Prime III is the newer, sleeker colleague - sharper suit, nice business card, promising you can "have it all" without breaking your back or your budget.
On paper, they share a lot: modest motors, commuter-friendly speeds, similar prices, and aluminium frames that won't fold if you sneeze at them. In practice, they feel quite different once you've actually lived with them - ridden in the rain, dragged up staircases, cursed at the tyres, and tried to stop suddenly when a taxi door appears out of nowhere.
If you're choosing your first "real" scooter or considering a lighter upgrade, this head-to-head will help you decide which compromises you're willing to live with - and which ones will annoy you every single day.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
Both the Xiaomi M365 and Razor E Prime III live in the same broad tribe: compact, relatively affordable city scooters for adults who want to solve the "last few kilometres" problem without buying an SUV on two wheels. They sit in a price band where you expect proper brakes, halfway decent batteries, and frames that don't flex like a folding chair.
They're aimed at riders who value practicality over bragging rights. You're more likely to be weaving between cyclists and prams than drag-racing e-scooter hulks. But they take different angles: Xiaomi leans into proven, commuter-first utility, while Razor pushes hard on ultra-low weight and a slightly sportier speed feel.
That makes them natural rivals: one is the default recommendation everyone knows, the other whispers "same money, lighter and faster" and hopes you won't look too closely at the trade-offs.
Design & Build Quality
Pick up the Xiaomi M365 and it immediately feels like what it is: the template most budget scooters have been copying for years. Matte aluminium, clean lines, cables routed where they won't catch on anything - it's not flashy, but it's coherent. The deck is solid, the stem feels properly anchored, and nothing rattles when you give it the "angry commuter shake test", at least when it's reasonably new.
The Razor E Prime III goes for an "industrial chic" office-friendly look: gunmetal finish, sharp edges, and a deck with full-length grip tape that will look at home next to a laptop bag. The frame also uses aluminium and feels pleasantly rigid; Razor's anti-rattle folding joint does a decent job of keeping the stem from chattering over time. In the hand, the Razor actually feels a touch more "engineered" around the folding area, while the Xiaomi feels a bit more "mass-produced but proven".
Where the Xiaomi shows its age is the hinge hardware: that bell-and-hook system is clever, but the stem latch is notorious for loosening and developing wobble if you don't baby it. The Razor's joint feels tighter and more modern out of the box. On the flip side, the M365's cockpit is brutally simple but robust - metal brake lever, minimal controls - while the Razor's thumb paddles feel a little more "gadgety", with more plastic in the mix.
Build philosophy? Xiaomi built something to be reproduced by the million and fixed endlessly. Razor built something to look slick in a shop and feel light under one arm. Both succeed at their goals, but one clearly prioritises long-term serviceability more than the other.
Ride Comfort & Handling
Neither of these scooters has "real" suspension, so your knees and tyres are the only shock absorbers in town. The way they approach that is quite different.
The Xiaomi M365 rolls on two air-filled tyres of the same size. That gives you a surprisingly soft, cohesive ride on typical city tarmac and bike paths. Hit a string of expansion joints or rough asphalt and the tyres soak up a lot of the harshness; the scooter feels like it glides rather than chatters. On cobbles, your knees still earn their keep, but the overall feel is predictable. The handling is neutral: the low battery-in-deck layout plants the centre of gravity, and the front motor makes the steering a touch more "alive" without feeling twitchy.
The Razor takes the "hybrid" route: soft up front, punishment out back. The pneumatic front tyre does a nice job protecting your hands from the first hit, but the solid rear transmits everything straight through your heels and calves. On smooth surfaces, it actually feels very composed and quick to turn - that low deck plays in its favour. After a few kilometres of cracked pavement or tiled sidewalks, though, you start to feel every imperfection and the rear end can skip slightly over sharper edges.
In tight city manoeuvres, the Razor feels a bit more agile and flickable - lighter, slightly smaller, eager to dart. The Xiaomi is calmer and more "bike-like": you settle into it and ride, rather than dance on it. For longer rides and daily abuse, that extra composure helps; for short zippy hops, the Razor's handling is fun, so long as the surface is kind.
Performance
On paper both have similar rated motors, but the way they deliver that power matters a lot more than the sticker.
The Xiaomi M365's front hub motor gives a smooth, linear surge once you've kicked off. It isn't a rocket, but it's honest. It pulls up to its legal-limit cruising speed with enough urgency to keep up with bikes and car-slowed traffic, without that "hang on to your fillings" punch. In stop-start city riding, it feels predictable: squeeze the throttle, it responds; roll off, regen kicks in gently if you've set it that way in the app. On mild hills it copes fine for average-weight riders; on steeper ramps, you feel the motor sag and you're tempted to add a helping kick or two.
The Razor's rear motor has a touch more urgency off the line, helped by the scooter's lower weight. Kick to start, prod the thumb paddle and it springs forward with a bit more eagerness than the Xiaomi, especially in the middle of the speed range. It pushes past the usual commuter ceiling by a few extra kilometres per hour, which you do feel - particularly when flowing with faster bicycle traffic. At that top end, the chassis stays reasonably composed on smooth ground.
But there's a price: climb anything more than a modest city incline and the E Prime III's motor confidence evaporates faster than you'd like. It's clearly tuned for flat cities and lighter riders. The Xiaomi isn't exactly a hill goat either, yet in side-by-side real riding it tends to bog down a bit less dramatically and feels slightly less out of its depth when the gradient bites.
Braking performance is where the M365 quietly reclaims ground. Mechanical disc at the rear plus regenerative braking up front, controlled by a single lever, gives you real bite with decent modulation. Emergency stops feel controlled rather than panicked. The Razor's electronic paddle plus rear fender brake combo technically offers redundancy, but using your foot to stomp the fender at higher speeds is more of a "last resort" than a refined system. The electronic brake alone can feel a touch abrupt until you learn its personality.
Battery & Range
Range is where marketing departments get creative and riders get disappointed. Both quote optimistic figures achieved by semi-mythical, feather-weight riders on endless flat bike paths at gentle speeds.
In real use, the Xiaomi M365 consistently manages commutes of roughly twenty-ish kilometres for an average adult riding briskly, with a little left in the tank if you aren't hammering full throttle the whole way. Push it harder, add hills or a heavier rider, and you start dipping closer to the mid-teens, but the battery pack is big enough that you're not constantly staring at the LED indicators with range anxiety after every coffee stop.
The Razor's smaller battery simply doesn't give you the same cushion. For many riders, especially towards the upper end of the weight limit, you're realistically talking a comfortable one-way city leg and perhaps a return if it's short, flat, and you're not abusing that higher top speed. Once you start using all the performance it offers, those remaining-range LEDs disappear a bit faster than you'd like.
Charging times are in the same general ballpark, with neither being dramatically faster in day-to-day life. You're plugging in for part of a workday or overnight either way. The difference is psychological: on the Xiaomi, a missed charge doesn't immediately spell trouble; on the Razor, you need to be a bit more disciplined about topping up if your commute stretches beyond the minimal urban norm.
Portability & Practicality
This is the Razor E Prime III's home turf. It's lighter than the Xiaomi by more than a token amount, and you feel that every single time you carry it up stairs or onto a train. If you're doing a multi-modal commute involving stations, lifts that never work, and the occasional sprint across platforms, that weight reduction isn't a nice-to-have - it's the difference between "fine" and "why did I buy this thing?"
The folding process on the Razor is quick and positive. The stem locks down crisply, and once folded, it's a compact, easy-to-swing package. The non-folding handlebars are the one miss here; they keep lateral width a little higher than it could be for really tight storage, but they also help keep the front end stiff when riding.
The Xiaomi M365 is no brick, but you are definitely more aware of it when carrying it for longer stretches. Up a single flight of stairs? No big deal. Up several floors regularly, or into a crowded metro twice a day? You'll notice the difference. The folding latch is quick but a bit more finicky, and that bell-as-hook solution is clever until it eventually loosens and needs adjusting or shimming.
In everyday use, both are easy to park, wheel into an office, or stash under a desk. The Xiaomi's wider parts ecosystem also means you can add hooks, racks, phone mounts and other nonsense effortlessly. The Razor's integrated lock point is a neat touch the Xiaomi lacks - finally, a scooter that thinks about where you'll actually put a U-lock.
Safety
Safety is part hardware, part behaviour. Both scooters give you the basics, but the Xiaomi quietly goes a bit further where it matters most.
Braking first: the M365's disc plus regen combo, triggered by one lever, means you can build instinctive muscle memory. You grab the brake, both wheels help you slow down, and the electronic system tries to prevent the front from locking. It's not a motorbike setup, but for this class it's reassuringly mature. The Razor's thumb electronic brake can be strong enough, but it takes more finesse, and the rear fender stomp is more of a "just in case" backup than something you want to rely on regularly at its top speed.
Lighting on both is "urban adequate". The Xiaomi's stem-mounted headlight is fine for being seen and just about usable to see on lit streets; the Razor's LED headlight is similar, arguably a tad brighter to oncoming eyes. Both have brake-responsive rear lights, and both benefit massively from an extra helmet or bar-mounted light if you ride in truly dark areas. Side visibility is helped by reflectors and decals on both, but neither is a rolling Christmas tree.
Stability-wise, the Xiaomi's dual air tyres and low deck give a planted, predictable feel. The Razor's rear drive helps with traction under acceleration, but that solid rear tyre can skip slightly under hard braking or on really broken surfaces. And in the pothole lottery, small wheels are small wheels: with both scooters, you simply have to scan ahead and treat deep holes as existential threats.
Community Feedback
| Xiaomi M365 | Razor E Prime III |
|---|---|
| What riders love Reliable daily workhorse, huge modding community, strong brakes, comfortable dual air tyres, great value, parts everywhere. |
What riders love Super light to carry, surprisingly quick for its size, solid anti-rattle stem, front air tyre, integrated lock point, grown-up looks. |
| What riders complain about Nightmare tube changes, stem wobble over time, no suspension, limited hill power, fragile rear fender and latch if abused. |
What riders complain about Weak on hills, real-world range short of claims, harsh solid rear tyre, no speed display or app, non-folding bars, basic details like port cover and kickstand. |
Price & Value
On sticker price, they're effectively in the same bracket. That's where the comparison stops being about "what can I afford" and becomes "what do I actually get for the money and how long will it stay worth something".
The Xiaomi M365 brings more battery, more established reliability, and the kind of global parts availability that usually belongs to mass-market cars, not scooters. If something breaks, there's a YouTube video, a forum thread, and three different aftermarket options to fix it. That keeps running costs low and extends the scooter's useful life dramatically. It's also a known quantity on the used market, which helps when you decide to sell and move up a class.
The Razor E Prime III offers lighter weight and a slightly higher top-speed feel without adding cost, and its frame quality is decent. Where it loses value is the smaller battery, less comfort at the back wheel, and a much thinner ecosystem if (or rather, when) you start needing parts outside the official channel. You're banking on everything working as-is for years; the Xiaomi assumes things will break and makes it cheap and easy to fix them.
Viewed as a multi-year commuter purchase rather than a gadget, the Xiaomi simply gives you more "useful life per euro". The Razor feels more like a well-specced but tighter package: nice while it lasts, less forgiving if your needs change or your luck runs out.
Service & Parts Availability
This one isn't even a close contest. The M365 is quite possibly the most supported scooter on the planet. Need a brake lever? A dashboard? Replacement screws for the rear mudguard? Someone, somewhere, is selling them for pocket change, and there's a forum post or video guiding you step by step. Independent repair shops know it inside out. For a commuter, that level of redundancy is gold.
Razor, to its credit, is a long-standing brand with official parts and support, especially in North America, and increasingly in Europe. You can get chargers, tyres and basic components. But it's a much more "official pipeline" experience: you're dealing with Razor or specific retailers, not a rich aftermarket. There's nothing inherently wrong with that, it's just less flexible and often less cheap than the Xiaomi ecosystem.
If you like tinkering, or you simply want the reassurance that any future problem has probably already been solved by a teenager on a forum, the Xiaomi is in another league. The Razor is fine if you're content to treat it more like an appliance than a platform.
Pros & Cons Summary
| Xiaomi M365 | Razor E Prime III |
|---|---|
Pros
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
Cons
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | Xiaomi M365 | Razor E Prime III |
|---|---|---|
| Motor power (rated) | 250 W front hub | 250 W rear hub |
| Top speed | 25 km/h | 29 km/h |
| Stated range | 30 km | 24 km |
| Realistic range (average rider) | 18-22 km | 15-18 km |
| Battery capacity | 280 Wh | 185 Wh |
| Weight | 12,5 kg | 11 kg |
| Brakes | Rear disc + front regen | Electronic thumb + rear fender |
| Suspension | None (pneumatic tyres only) | None (front pneumatic, rear solid) |
| Tyres | 8,5" pneumatic front & rear | 8" pneumatic front, 8" solid rear |
| Max load | 100 kg | 100 kg |
| IP rating | IP54 (claimed) | Not specified (consumer grade) |
| Price | 467 € | 461 € |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
If your daily life involves carrying your scooter up multiple staircases, threading through turnstiles and stuffing it into absurdly small spaces, the Razor E Prime III does make a strong case. It's light, nimble, and feels just that bit more eager when you open the throttle on flat ground. For short, predictable, mostly smooth urban hops, it can be a genuinely pleasant little tool.
But stretch the use case even slightly - longer commutes, more mixed surfaces, the odd hill, a couple of years of ownership - and the Xiaomi M365 starts to look like the more sensible, and frankly more complete, companion. It rides more naturally, brakes better, goes further on a charge, and lives in an ecosystem where almost nothing is terminally broken. It may be the "old classic" rather than the shiny newcomer, but for most riders who want a reliable, fixable commuter rather than a lightweight toy flirting with adult duty, the M365 is the one that will quietly keep earning its space in your hallway.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | Xiaomi M365 | Razor E Prime III |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ✅ 1,67 €/Wh | ❌ 2,49 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ❌ 18,68 €/km/h | ✅ 15,90 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ✅ 44,64 g/Wh | ❌ 59,46 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | ❌ 0,50 kg/km/h | ✅ 0,38 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ✅ 23,35 €/km | ❌ 27,94 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ✅ 0,63 kg/km | ❌ 0,67 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ❌ 14,00 Wh/km | ✅ 11,20 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ✅ 10,00 W/km/h | ❌ 8,62 W/km/h |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | ❌ 0,05 kg/W | ✅ 0,04 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ✅ 56,00 W | ❌ 37,00 W |
These metrics let you see how much "stuff" you get for your money and weight: euros per battery capacity, weight per unit of range or speed, and how large the charger effectively feels. Lower values are generally better for cost and portability metrics; higher values are better for power-to-speed punch and how fast the battery fills, helping you decide whether you prioritise efficiency, performance, or packability.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | Xiaomi M365 | Razor E Prime III |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ❌ Noticeably heavier to carry | ✅ Much lighter, very portable |
| Range | ✅ More usable daily range | ❌ Shorter, more marginal range |
| Max Speed | ❌ Limited to commuter pace | ✅ Slightly faster, more flow |
| Power | ✅ Holds better on inclines | ❌ Drops off faster uphill |
| Battery Size | ✅ Larger pack, more flexibility | ❌ Smaller pack, stricter limits |
| Suspension | ✅ Dual air tyres as cushion | ❌ Solid rear hits harder |
| Design | ✅ Iconic, clean, well-resolved | ❌ Slick but slightly gadgety |
| Safety | ✅ Stronger, more intuitive brakes | ❌ Foot brake less confidence |
| Practicality | ✅ Better range, parts, mods | ❌ Great weight, weaker rest |
| Comfort | ✅ Softer, calmer ride overall | ❌ Rear harsh, more vibration |
| Features | ✅ Cruise, app, regen tuning | ❌ Basic LEDs, few extras |
| Serviceability | ✅ Easy DIY, huge documentation | ❌ Mostly official-channel only |
| Customer Support | ❌ Patchy, distributor-dependent | ✅ More structured Razor support |
| Fun Factor | ✅ Playful, tweakable, community | ❌ Functional fun, less character |
| Build Quality | ✅ Proven frame, known weaknesses | ❌ Good, but less battle-tested |
| Component Quality | ✅ Brakes, tyres feel more serious | ❌ More plastic, simpler bits |
| Brand Name | ✅ Strong in e-scooter segment | ❌ Legacy toy image lingers |
| Community | ✅ Massive, vibrant, global | ❌ Smaller, less technical |
| Lights (visibility) | ✅ Adequate, brake light useful | ✅ Adequate, reflective decals |
| Lights (illumination) | ✅ Decent for lit streets | ❌ Bright but still basic |
| Acceleration | ❌ Mild, more progressive | ✅ Sharper, livelier mid-range |
| Arrive with smile factor | ✅ Effortless, customisable ride | ❌ Fun, but more constrained |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ✅ Softer ride, better brakes | ❌ Harsher, more attention needed |
| Charging speed | ✅ More Wh added per hour | ❌ Slower refill per capacity |
| Reliability | ✅ Long-term field-proven | ❌ Less long-term data |
| Folded practicality | ❌ Slightly bulkier, latch quirks | ✅ Compact, tight folding joint |
| Ease of transport | ❌ Heavier on stairs, trains | ✅ Featherweight, easy everywhere |
| Handling | ✅ Stable, confidence at speed | ❌ Agile but rear can skip |
| Braking performance | ✅ Disc + regen works well | ❌ Electronic + fender compromise |
| Riding position | ✅ Natural stance, decent deck | ❌ Low deck, heel strikes |
| Handlebar quality | ✅ Simple, solid, functional | ❌ Comfortable grips, but plasticky |
| Throttle response | ✅ Smooth, predictable, tunable | ❌ Sharper, less refined feel |
| Dashboard/Display | ❌ Minimal LEDs, no speed | ❌ Minimal LEDs, no speed |
| Security (locking) | ❌ No dedicated lock point | ✅ Built-in lock eyelet |
| Weather protection | ✅ Decent splash resistance | ❌ Less clearly specified |
| Resale value | ✅ Strong, high demand used | ❌ More niche, slower resale |
| Tuning potential | ✅ Huge firmware, hardware mods | ❌ Very limited tuning scene |
| Ease of maintenance | ✅ Guides, parts, local know-how | ❌ Depends mostly on Razor |
| Value for Money | ✅ More scooter per euro | ❌ Pays weight, loses range |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the XIAOMI M365 scores 6 points against the RAZOR E Prime III's 4. In the Author's Category Battle, the XIAOMI M365 gets 31 ✅ versus 8 ✅ for RAZOR E Prime III.
Totals: XIAOMI M365 scores 37, RAZOR E Prime III scores 12.
Based on the scoring, the XIAOMI M365 is our overall winner. When you put real kilometres under both wheels, the Xiaomi M365 simply feels like the more complete companion: calmer to ride, easier to stop, less fussy about distance, and backed by an army of riders who've already solved every problem you're likely to encounter. The Razor E Prime III has its charms - chiefly that delightfully low weight and a bit of extra wind in your face - but it asks you to live within tighter limits and to accept more compromises if your commute grows or your roads worsen. If I were buying a scooter to rely on rather than to flirt with, I'd take the Xiaomi's proven, slightly unglamorous competence over the Razor's lighter, flashier but more constrained package. It's the one that keeps you riding, not just smiling in the shop.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.

