Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
If you just want the safer bet for everyday commuting, the Xiaomi Mi Electric Scooter 3 edges out overall: it's the more mature, better-supported package with fewer unpleasant surprises down the road. The LEVY Original fights back with its clever swappable battery and slightly punchier feel, but makes you swallow a higher cost per kilometre and some notable compromises. Choose the Xiaomi if you want a straightforward, proven city runabout with cheap parts and strong community backing. Pick the LEVY if removable batteries and compact charging matter more to you than efficiency and refinement.
Both can get you to work on time - the interesting part is how differently they do it, so it's worth diving into the details before you put money down.
Urban commuters shopping for a light, toss-in-the-hallway scooter will run into these two very quickly: the Xiaomi Mi Electric Scooter 3, the spiritual successor to the scooter that kicked off the whole craze, and the LEVY Original, the "I brought my battery, not my scooter" New Yorker.
I've put real kilometres on both - rush-hour bike lanes, badly patched tarmac, light rain I definitely "didn't see in the forecast", and a few ill-advised shortcuts over cobblestones. On paper they sit in the same price and power class. On the street, they feel more like two different philosophies of how a small commuter should solve your daily grind.
The Xiaomi is for people who just want the default answer that works; the LEVY is for people who obsess over where the nearest wall socket is. Stick around - the devil, as usual, is in the details, and a few of them genuinely matter.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
Both scooters live in that sweet-spot entry-to-mid commuter bracket: light enough to carry, fast enough to keep up with bicycles, and not so expensive that you're afraid to lock them outside a café for ten minutes.
The Xiaomi Mi Electric Scooter 3 is the archetypal "first real scooter": you get a familiar form factor, modest power, decent range, and the reassurance of a gigantic user base and parts ecosystem. It's the one your non-nerd friend has heard of.
The LEVY Original is aimed more at logistics nerds and apartment dwellers: people who look at an e-scooter and immediately think, "Where am I going to charge this, and what if my landlord freaks out?" The removable battery completely changes how you live with it, even if the per-pack range isn't exactly heroic.
They're direct competitors because they cost roughly the same, travel at broadly similar speeds, and target the same urban commuter doing short to medium trips. But they're betting on different answers to the same question: how do I make this thing painless to own?
Design & Build Quality
In the hand, the Xiaomi feels like a mass-market gadget refined over multiple generations. The frame is clean, welds are neat, and the cockpit looks like it came out of a consumer electronics design studio rather than a scooter factory. Cables are mostly tucked away, the integrated display is tidy, and the overall impression is "finished product", not prototype.
The LEVY feels more utilitarian. The stem is thicker because of the internal battery, and visually it's more "urban tool" than design object. The folding hinge is reassuringly solid and the frame doesn't scream "budget clone", but you do notice a slightly more industrial vibe: things are sturdy, but less finessed.
Both use aluminium frames, but Xiaomi's fit-and-finish is a touch more polished - the rubber deck mat, internal routing and overall silhouette are very dialled-in. LEVY counters with a satisfying, precise battery hatch and a stem that feels bombproof even when hammered over rough bike paths.
If you care about how it looks leaning against a café wall, Xiaomi wins on elegance. If you care more about function and being able to yank a battery out of the stem with a solid "click", the LEVY has its own kind of charm.
Ride Comfort & Handling
Let's get the big one out of the way: neither scooter has suspension. Your knees are the suspension. Your ankles are the rebound. Welcome to lightweight commuting.
The Xiaomi rolls on smaller tyres and a very stiff frame. On smooth asphalt, it glides nicely and feels tight and quiet. Five kilometres of broken pavement and tiled sidewalks, however, and you'll start to negotiate with the city council in your head. You feel the road in your hands and feet; it's not unbearable, but you won't mistake it for a plush cruiser.
The LEVY does noticeably better over rough stuff, mainly thanks to its larger pneumatic tyres and a touch more deck flex. On patched city streets and the usual cracks, it softens the chatter in a way the Xiaomi just doesn't. You still get jolted by nasty potholes - there are no miracles here - but the everyday buzz is toned down.
Handling-wise, the Xiaomi feels compact and nimble. The narrow deck and light front end make it easy to thread between pedestrians and bollards, though at higher speeds you do feel you're on a small, rather taut platform. LEVY's slightly bigger wheels and more planted front give you a bit more confidence when you're dodging parked cars and tram tracks; it tracks straighter and feels a touch calmer at its top speed.
If your city has decent bike lanes and you're lightweight yourself, the Xiaomi's harsher ride is tolerable. If your reality is a mess of patched tarmac and occasional cobblestones, the LEVY's tyres earn their keep very quickly.
Performance
Both scooters live firmly in the "sane commuter" performance class: quick enough for daily use, not built to scare you.
The Xiaomi's motor delivers a brisk but civil shove. In its fastest mode it gets up to its legal-limit pace with enough urgency to keep you flowing with city cyclists, though heavier riders will notice it running out of enthusiasm on steeper ramps and when the battery dips below halfway. Front-wheel drive gives that familiar "pulled along" feeling, and power delivery is smooth rather than dramatic.
The LEVY feels slightly more eager off the line. Its motor has a bit more peak grunt, and you do notice that when overtaking sleepy riders from a traffic light. On flat ground it will creep past Xiaomi's cruising speed by a few km/h, which doesn't sound like much but is noticeable on open stretches. Again, once hills get serious or the rider weight climbs, both remember their commuter DNA and slow down, but LEVY hangs on a touch better.
Hill-climbing is acceptable on both for typical bridges, underpasses and medium gradients. With a backpack and a bad breakfast, I had to resign myself to reduced pace on steeper climbs on both scooters. The Xiaomi can feel a bit anaemic on longer hills; the LEVY copes slightly better but still won't turn Alpine ascents into your new hobby.
Braking is where Xiaomi quietly shines: its combination of front electronic braking and a proper dual-pad rear disc gives you predictable, strong stops with decent modulation. The LEVY's trio of regen, rear disc and fender brake sounds impressive, and it is functional, but the feel through the lever isn't quite as refined; it gets the job done, just with less sophistication.
Battery & Range
The Xiaomi plays the "one fixed battery, modest but usable range" card. In the real world, ridden at normal city speeds with the faster mode engaged, you're looking at a medium-sized urban round trip before you start watching the battery bars more closely. Push it hard, weigh more, or fight headwinds, and that comfortable buffer shrinks. It's fine for most daily commutes under roughly ten kilometres each way, but you're not going touring on it.
The LEVY, by contrast, is built around the assumption that the battery is not a sacred, welded-in relic. On a single pack, its realistic range is shorter than Xiaomi's - you're into "short commute and errands" territory rather than wide-city exploration. But you can toss a spare pack in your bag and double it instantly, without turning the scooter into a lead weight. That flexibility is the whole point.
In practice, this means: with Xiaomi, you plan your route around the fact that you have a single, moderate-sized tank. With LEVY, you plan your route around whether you remembered the second battery. If you don't fancy babysitting packs or paying extra for them, the Xiaomi's straightforward setup actually feels less fussy. If you're the kind of person who already carries a laptop, charger and half your life in a backpack, sneaking in another battery is just business as usual.
Charging is also different in character. Xiaomi's pack takes noticeably longer to fill from empty, and the scooter needs to be near a socket. LEVY's smaller pack tops up quicker and can be charged at your desk, on a shelf, or anywhere you'd charge a laptop, leaving the road-dirty scooter frame wherever it's convenient. That alone can be a game-changer for some users.
Portability & Practicality
This is where both scooters are trying hard to win your daily routine.
The Xiaomi is light enough to carry in one hand up a flight or two of stairs without regretting your choices in life. The folding mechanism is now refined compared to early Xiaomi generations; it's a quick, mostly one-handed affair once you're used to it, and the bell hook to mudguard latch is a simple, effective way to lock it for carrying. Folded, it's compact enough for under-desk storage and the boot of a small car.
The LEVY is fractionally lighter again, and you feel that when you're hoisting it onto a train or up narrow stairwells. Its fold is similarly quick, and it doesn't rattle around once latched. Where it really pulls ahead in practicality is daily charging and theft deterrence: lock the bare frame outside, pop the battery out and walk into the office with what looks like a thermos. No awkwardly wheeling a dirty scooter past the receptionist and pretending it's "just a big briefcase".
However, that practicality comes with a bit more mental overhead. With Xiaomi, you only think about the scooter: is it charged, where will I store it? With LEVY, you're thinking about scooter plus loose, not-cheap batteries: did I bring the pack, where do I put the spare, how do I lock the frame so nobody steals the 'empty' scooter? If you're not the most organised soul, there's something to be said for Xiaomi's simpler life.
Safety
On the safety front, both tick the core boxes, but in slightly different ways.
Xiaomi's updated braking hardware is one of its best upgrades over earlier generations. The dual-pad rear disc bites cleanly, and combined with front electronic braking, stops are confident and drama-free on dry tarmac. You also get decent lighting and lots of reflectors sprinkled around the chassis. Night-time visibility is reasonable for city use: you're visible, and you can see enough of the road immediately ahead, though this is still scooter lighting, not a bikepacking lamp.
LEVY's braking system is more belt-and-braces: electronic braking up front, a mechanical rear disc, plus the old-school stomp-on-the-fender backup. In emergency situations it's reassuring to know there's always one more way to slow the thing down. Grip from the larger pneumatic tyres is solid, especially in the wet, and the scooter feels sure-footed in corners.
In terms of stability at their top speeds, both feel composed if you're on decent surfaces and have a sensible stance. Xiaomi's smaller tyres and stiffer chassis make it feel a bit more nervous on rougher patches, whereas LEVY's bigger wheels and front heft lend it more composure when the surface goes from "bike lane" to "municipal afterthought". Lighting on LEVY is fine for being seen; as with Xiaomi, don't expect to carve unlit country lanes at night with stock hardware.
Community Feedback
| Xiaomi Mi Electric Scooter 3 | LEVY Original |
|---|---|
What riders love
|
What riders love
|
What riders complain about
|
What riders complain about
|
Price & Value
Both come in at broadly the same price level, which makes every weakness sting a bit more and every strength more important.
With Xiaomi, you're paying for a mass-produced, mature platform. That brings economies of scale: spare parts are everywhere, third-party accessories abound, and if something breaks outside warranty, a replacement part is often cheap and a YouTube search away. The scooter itself is not a screaming bargain, but it's a solid, predictable purchase with a low risk of "surprise expenses".
LEVY asks for a similar outlay but bundles in that removable battery system as its headline trick. On the face of it, that's a premium feature for the price class. But to really benefit, you're strongly encouraged to buy extra batteries, which aren't free. Once you factor in realistic range per pack and the cost of spares, your cost per kilometre can quietly creep above what the Xiaomi demands, especially if you ride regularly at full tilt.
So the question is: do you value long-term simplicity and cheap parts (Xiaomi) more, or the day-to-day flexibility of a modular battery system (LEVY) enough to tolerate a bit of financial inefficiency?
Service & Parts Availability
This is one of Xiaomi's trump cards. Thanks to years of market dominance, practically every scooter repair shop knows how to work on these, and parts - from tyres to controllers to random bits of plastic - are easy to source. If you're a DIY tinkerer, you're spoiled for choice. If you're not, your local repair guy has almost certainly done a Xiaomi brake bleed before.
LEVY, while a much smaller brand, does better than many boutique names. Official parts are available from the company, and their background in rental fleets shows in the scooter's modular construction - it's built to be fixable. That said, outside their main markets you're more dependent on ordering from them directly, and you won't find quite the same ocean of third-party bits and community mods.
If you live in a large European city, Xiaomi is the easy winner on sheer convenience of service. LEVY is respectable, just not quite at "everyone and their neighbour knows how to fix it" level yet.
Pros & Cons Summary
| Xiaomi Mi Electric Scooter 3 | LEVY Original |
|---|---|
Pros
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
Cons
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | Xiaomi Mi Electric Scooter 3 | LEVY Original |
|---|---|---|
| Motor power (rated) | 300 W | 350 W |
| Motor power (peak) | 600 W | 700 W |
| Top speed | 25 km/h | 29 km/h |
| Claimed range | 30 km | 16 km (per battery) |
| Realistic city range (approx.) | 20 km | 14 km (per battery) |
| Battery capacity | 275 Wh | 230 Wh |
| Weight | 13,2 kg | 12,25 kg |
| Brakes | Front E-ABS + rear disc (dual-pad) | Front E-ABS + rear disc + rear fender |
| Suspension | None | None |
| Tyres | 8,5" pneumatic | 10" pneumatic |
| Max load | 100 kg | 125 kg |
| Water resistance | IP54 | IP54 |
| Charging time (0-100 %) | 5,5 h | 3,0 h |
| Removable battery | No | Yes |
| Approx. price | 462 € | 472 € |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
If I had to recommend one of these to a typical European city commuter who just wants something that works, day in, day out, the Xiaomi Mi Electric Scooter 3 is the safer, more rounded choice. It's not thrilling, and the ride can be unforgiving on bad surfaces, but it behaves predictably, is easy to live with, and sits on top of a mountain of spare parts and community knowledge. For most people doing modest commutes on reasonable roads, it quietly gets the job done with minimal drama.
The LEVY Original is more niche, and better when it fits that niche perfectly. If you live in a walk-up, can't bring a full scooter indoors, or your workplace would have a meltdown at the sight of wheels in the lobby, that removable battery is genuinely transformative. Pair that with slightly better comfort and a bit more pep, and it becomes very appealing - as long as you accept the shorter per-pack range and the extra cost of backups.
So: if you want a default, proven commuter that you can fix almost anywhere, go Xiaomi. If you're willing to pay a little more over time for charging flexibility and you like the idea of treating the scooter like a dock for batteries, the LEVY can make a lot of sense - just go in with open eyes about how far each pack really takes you.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | Xiaomi Mi Electric Scooter 3 | LEVY Original |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ✅ 1,68 €/Wh | ❌ 2,05 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ❌ 18,48 €/km/h | ✅ 16,28 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ✅ 48,00 g/Wh | ❌ 53,26 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | ❌ 0,53 kg/km/h | ✅ 0,42 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ✅ 23,10 €/km | ❌ 33,71 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ✅ 0,66 kg/km | ❌ 0,88 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ✅ 13,75 Wh/km | ❌ 16,43 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ❌ 12,00 W/km/h | ✅ 12,07 W/km/h |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | ❌ 0,044 kg/W | ✅ 0,035 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ❌ 50,00 W | ✅ 76,67 W |
These metrics strip things down to pure maths. Price-per-Wh and price-per-km tell you how much you pay to store and use energy. Weight-based metrics show how much scooter you're lugging around per unit of performance or range. Wh per km is your energy efficiency - how thirsty each scooter is. Power-to-speed and weight-to-power hint at how lively they feel for their size. Charging speed simply reflects how quickly each battery can be refilled when fully drained.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | Xiaomi Mi Electric Scooter 3 | LEVY Original |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ❌ Slightly heavier overall | ✅ Marginally lighter to carry |
| Range | ✅ Longer per full charge | ❌ Shorter per battery |
| Max Speed | ❌ Slower, legally capped | ✅ A bit higher cruising |
| Power | ❌ Adequate, nothing more | ✅ Feels slightly punchier |
| Battery Size | ✅ Larger fixed capacity | ❌ Smaller individual pack |
| Suspension | ❌ No suspension at all | ❌ No suspension either |
| Design | ✅ Cleaner, more refined look | ❌ Chunkier, more utilitarian |
| Safety | ✅ Strong brakes, good reflectors | ❌ Fine, but less polished |
| Practicality | ✅ Simple, low-maintenance routine | ❌ Depends on extra batteries |
| Comfort | ❌ Harsher over bad roads | ✅ Bigger tyres, smoother ride |
| Features | ❌ Basic feature set only | ✅ Swappable battery, cruise |
| Serviceability | ✅ Parts everywhere, easy fixes | ❌ More limited, brand-centric |
| Customer Support | ❌ Variable, volume brand | ✅ Responsive, smaller operation |
| Fun Factor | ❌ Sensible rather than exciting | ✅ Livelier, swappable tricks |
| Build Quality | ✅ Mature, well-sorted chassis | ❌ Solid, but more basic |
| Component Quality | ✅ Brakes, latch feel refined | ❌ Some parts feel cheaper |
| Brand Name | ✅ Globally recognised, mainstream | ❌ Smaller, niche recognition |
| Community | ✅ Huge modding, repair crowd | ❌ Smaller but decent group |
| Lights (visibility) | ✅ Reflectors and bright rear | ❌ Adequate but unremarkable |
| Lights (illumination) | ❌ OK only for lit streets | ❌ Similar, city use mainly |
| Acceleration | ❌ Mild, linear shove | ✅ Punchier, more eager |
| Arrive with smile factor | ❌ Competent, not thrilling | ✅ More playful character |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ✅ Predictable, low-stress ride | ❌ Range watching if one pack |
| Charging speed | ❌ Slower full recharge | ✅ Faster turnaround per pack |
| Reliability | ✅ Proven platform, robust | ❌ Good, but less battle-tested |
| Folded practicality | ✅ Compact, familiar package | ✅ Similarly compact, secure |
| Ease of transport | ❌ Slightly bulkier feel | ✅ Lighter, easier up stairs |
| Handling | ❌ Nervous on rough surfaces | ✅ More stable, bigger wheels |
| Braking performance | ✅ Strong, well-balanced system | ❌ Effective, less refined feel |
| Riding position | ❌ Cramped for tall riders | ✅ Slightly roomier, more natural |
| Handlebar quality | ✅ Clean, solid interface | ❌ Functional, less polished |
| Throttle response | ❌ Sensible, slightly subdued | ✅ Punchy, responsive feel |
| Dashboard/Display | ✅ Clear, integrated, readable | ❌ Harder to read in sun |
| Security (locking) | ❌ Needs full scooter inside | ✅ Battery removal discourages theft |
| Weather protection | ✅ Well-proven IP54 behaviour | ❌ Adequate, less field history |
| Resale value | ✅ Strong second-hand demand | ❌ Smaller market, harder sell |
| Tuning potential | ✅ Huge modding, firmware scene | ❌ Limited tuning ecosystem |
| Ease of maintenance | ✅ Guides, parts, known quirks | ❌ More brand-dependent repairs |
| Value for Money | ✅ Better efficiency per euro | ❌ Pay more per kilometre |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the XIAOMI Mi Electric Scooter 3 scores 5 points against the LEVY Original's 5. In the Author's Category Battle, the XIAOMI Mi Electric Scooter 3 gets 22 ✅ versus 16 ✅ for LEVY Original.
Totals: XIAOMI Mi Electric Scooter 3 scores 27, LEVY Original scores 21.
Based on the scoring, the XIAOMI Mi Electric Scooter 3 is our overall winner. Riding both back-to-back, the Xiaomi Mi Electric Scooter 3 feels like the more complete, if slightly conservative, everyday partner: it may not excite you, but it quietly earns your trust. The LEVY Original is clever and genuinely fun in the right circumstances, yet its charms rely heavily on you buying into the whole spare-battery lifestyle. If your heart wants modular tricks and a bit more spark, the LEVY will make you grin. But if your head wants a scooter that simply gets on with the job, is easy to fix, and won't surprise you with awkward compromises, the Xiaomi is the one you'll likely still be riding - and recommending - a few years from now.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.

