Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
The Xiaomi Pro 2 is the overall winner here: it is faster, goes dramatically further, carries heavier riders, and is simply much closer to a "real" adult commuter vehicle than the Razor Raven. It feels more complete as daily transport, with stronger brakes, better safety features, and a far more mature ecosystem of parts and support.
The Razor Raven makes sense only if you are a lighter teen or student on a tight budget who mostly rides short, flat neighbourhood or campus routes and values light weight and low price over everything else. For actual commuting, mixed traffic, or heavier riders, the Raven runs out of talent quickly.
If you care about getting reliably from A to B without constant compromises, go Xiaomi. If you just want a cheap, fun runabout for a younger rider, the Raven can still earn its keep.
Stick around for the full comparison-this is where the real differences (and a few surprises) show up.
Electric scooters have split into two very different tribes: serious daily transport and budget fun machines. The Xiaomi Pro 2 sits firmly in the first camp-a known quantity in European cities, the scooter version of a sensible hatchback. The Razor Raven, on the other hand, is more like your first moped: affordable, approachable, and designed to give teenagers a taste of powered freedom without terrifying their parents.
I've spent many kilometres riding both: the Xiaomi on grim winter commutes and long city loops, the Razor doing exactly what it was meant to do-short hops, parks, and campus-style cruising. On paper they almost shouldn't be compared, yet in the real world they're exactly what many buyers cross-shop: "proper" commuter versus cheaper, lighter alternative.
The Xiaomi Pro 2 suits the rider who wants a no-nonsense, regulations-friendly commuter they can live with every day. The Razor Raven is for lighter, younger riders who mainly want something fun and simple for short distances. If you're undecided which camp you're in, the next sections will make that very clear.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
Both scooters sit in the "affordable but not disposable" segment-but at very different ends of it. The Xiaomi Pro 2 costs roughly two and a half times as much as the Razor Raven, and you feel that gap everywhere: power, range, carrying capacity, and overall seriousness as a transport tool.
The Pro 2 is aimed at adults replacing or supplementing public transport for daily commutes, typically in the 5-15 km bracket per day. It is built to sit in bike lanes and mix with city traffic at legal speeds without feeling like a toy. The Raven is explicitly pitched at teens and lighter young adults who mostly need a few kilometres of flat, low-stress travel and a dose of fun.
So why compare them? Because the real question a lot of buyers ask is: "Do I stretch my budget for a proper commuter, or save money and accept some compromises?" This showdown is exactly that decision, in scooter form.
Design & Build Quality
Pick up the Xiaomi Pro 2 and you instantly feel the "consumer electronics" design language: clean matte aluminium frame, tidy cable routing, integrated stem display. It's minimalist, timeless, and clearly designed to look at home next to a laptop and a shared office bike rack. The folding joint feels reasonably precise (at least when new), and the whole package has that "mass-produced but decently refined" vibe.
The Razor Raven feels different from the first touch. The steel frame gives it a slightly denser, more old-school heft, and it feels like something that could survive a teenage misjudged curb drop. The plastics are more obvious, the overall shape a bit more "fun machine" than "serious vehicle", but to Razor's credit, there's very little rattle and almost no cheap creaking when you bounce it around.
Design philosophies diverge sharply: Xiaomi is all about sleek urban commuting. Razor is about robustness and approachability. The Pro 2 looks like transport. The Raven looks like a toy that's grown up just enough to be allowed on the street. If you're locking it outside an office, the Xiaomi blends in. The Raven still whispers "my owner might be revising for GCSEs".
Ride Comfort & Handling
Here's where theory and reality clash nicely. On paper the Xiaomi should suffer: no suspension at all, just relatively small air-filled tyres. On fresh tarmac it glides; on patched city streets it's acceptable; on cobbles it becomes an involuntary fitness programme for your knees and wrists. After about 5 km of neglected pavements, you start planning a route based purely on which streets were resurfaced this decade.
The Raven uses an interesting "mullet" setup: a big, soft front tyre and a smaller solid rear. That large front air tyre does a surprisingly good job smoothing out joints and minor cracks-your hands get a much easier time than your heels. Over repeated bumps the rear will still remind you there's no real suspension, but for its intended short, flat rides the comfort is honestly better than many all-solid-tyre budget scooters.
Handling-wise, the Pro 2 feels more planted at its higher speeds. The wheelbase, deck length and weight give you a stable stance when carving through bike lanes. Quick turns are predictable, and once you get used to the front-wheel motor tug, it feels composed even near its limiter.
The Raven, with its big front wheel and rear-drive motor, actually tracks nicely at its more modest pace. The front doesn't twitch, and the gyroscopic effect of that tyre helps it run straight. It's light and nimble-great for weaving around pedestrians on a riverside path-but you're always aware that it's tuned for fun and control, not aggressive cornering or emergency manoeuvres at higher speeds.
Performance
The Xiaomi Pro 2 is not a rocket by enthusiast standards, but coming off the line in its fastest mode, it has enough punch to jump ahead of bicycles at lights and keep pace with city traffic up to the legal cap. Throttle response is nicely progressive; you can feather it through crowded areas without the scooter lurching forward, but if you pin it on an empty stretch, it gets up to its top speed briskly enough to feel "properly" motorised.
On hills, the Xiaomi does its best work with average-weight riders on modest gradients. On longer or steeper climbs, especially with heavier riders, you feel the motor digging deep and your speed dropping, but it will usually get you there without walk-of-shame pushing-just don't expect heroics. Braking, however, is one of its strong suits: the combo of front electronic braking and rear disc gives you progressive, confident stopping, and you can scrub speed quickly without drama once you're used to the feel.
The Raven's rear motor has much less grunt. From a walking push it spins up eagerly enough on flat ground, and up to its modest top speed it feels nippy rather than sluggish-especially for lighter teens. But compared to the Xiaomi, acceleration is clearly in a different league. It's fine for paths and neighbourhood streets; it starts to feel out of its depth if you try to mix with fast cyclists or impatient car traffic.
Point either scooter at a steep incline and the difference is glaring. Where the Xiaomi will soldier on at reduced speed, the Raven can simply give up under a heavier rider, forcing you to kick-assist like it's a glorified push scooter. Braking is also much less sophisticated: the electronic brake is gentle and decent for its speed range, the rear fender brake is pure backup. It's enough for the pace it manages, but it doesn't inspire the same "I can handle a panic stop" confidence as the Xiaomi's setup.
Battery & Range
Range is where the Pro 2 absolutely crushes the Raven. In real life, riding at realistic urban speeds with a mix of stops and starts, the Xiaomi will comfortably handle typical city commutes with headroom to spare. You can do a there-and-back journey into town and still have enough juice for detours without nervously eyeing the battery indicator at every traffic light.
The flip side is charging time. Topping the Pro 2 from low to full is very much an overnight or full-workday affair. You don't "grab a quick coffee and gain meaningful range". It suits riders who plug in at home or work and think in days, not in rapid top-ups.
The Raven's battery is small, and you feel it. Used in its most fun mode, on realistic paths with a few mild inclines, the true range is more "short commute or evening spin" than "all-day roaming". For a teen looping around a neighbourhood or a student bouncing between campus buildings, that's fine. As an adult trying to do a significant commute, you'll hit its limits very quickly.
On the plus side, the smaller pack means charging doesn't take an eternity, and for genuinely short-hop use you can happily plug it in after school or after work and be ready for the next outing. But range anxiety arrives far sooner on the Raven, especially if you're anywhere near its load limit.
Portability & Practicality
Both scooters fold, both are reasonably light-after that, the similarities fade.
The Xiaomi Pro 2 sits in the "just about okay" weight class: not featherweight, but still manageable for stairs, lifts and the occasional sprint down a station platform. The folding mechanism is quick and familiar, and the folded package is long and slim. The non-folding handlebars mean it keeps its full bar width even when folded, which can be annoying on packed trains or in cramped hallways.
The Raven is genuinely easy to live with in this regard. The lower weight means even younger teens can fold, lift and stash it without much drama. Folded, it takes up very little space, and the steel kickstand feels more robust than you'd expect at the price. For dorm rooms, crowded classrooms, or tiny flats, it's easier to tuck out of the way than the Xiaomi.
But practicality isn't only about size and weight. The Pro 2's higher load capacity, better weather resistance rating, and generally more serious componentry make it far more viable as your primary transport. The Raven's strict weight limit and lack of clearly stated water resistance make it feel much more like a fair-weather, light-rider companion than a "use it in all seasons" tool.
Safety
At commuter speeds, safety isn't a nice-to-have; it's the whole ball game. The Xiaomi Pro 2 takes that reasonably seriously: dual braking (electronic and mechanical), bright front light with a sensible beam pattern, a proper rear brake light that reacts when you slow, and reflectors where you'd expect them. The air-filled tyres give predictable grip in corners and under braking, especially in the wet-provided you respect the small wheel size and avoid potholes big enough to swallow them.
Stability is decent at its capped top speed. You can feel some flex in the folding assembly on older, heavily used units, but a well-maintained Pro 2 tracks straight and inspires confidence. You can do emergency stops without feeling like you're about to fold the scooter in half.
The Raven also makes a decent effort for its category. The integrated headlight is a nice touch at this price, and bright enough for low-speed suburban rides. The dual-brake arrangement-electronic plus old-school fender-gives basic redundancy, which is important with younger riders. The kick-to-start requirement is a small but meaningful safety feature, stopping the scooter from bolting forward if someone accidentally hits the throttle when standing still.
However, the Raven lacks the all-round lighting package and wet-weather thoughtfulness of the Xiaomi. The smaller solid rear tyre also has less ultimate grip, and there's no formal weather rating proudly advertised. At its lower speeds the safety envelope is adequate, but if you're thinking about dawn or dusk commuting in busy European cities, the Xiaomi is in another league.
Community Feedback
| Xiaomi Pro 2 | Razor Raven |
|---|---|
What riders love
|
What riders love
|
What riders complain about
|
What riders complain about
|
Price & Value
On sticker price alone, the Razor Raven looks like the obvious bargain: it costs roughly what some people spend on a single month of city transport. For a teen or light student who just needs a few kilometres of fun mobility, it's hard to argue with that. You're paying for a known brand, a steel frame, certified electrics, and a ride that's kinder to the body than most cheap solid-tyre clones.
But value isn't just "how cheap can I go?" Once you factor in range, speed, carrying capacity and long-term utility, the Xiaomi Pro 2 earns its higher asking price. It can replace daily buses or short car journeys in a way the Raven simply can't. Over a year or two of regular commuting, the Pro 2 feels more like a transport investment; the Raven feels like a leisure gadget that incidentally handles a bit of transport.
If your budget absolutely cannot stretch, the Raven gives you honest hardware for the money. If you can afford the Xiaomi, it pays you back in usefulness and lifespan. Long term, the Pro 2 is the better value for most adults, even if the upfront hit stings more.
Service & Parts Availability
This category is almost unfair. Xiaomi scooters are everywhere, and so are their parts. Need a new tyre, fender, brake disc or third-party suspension kit? They're a search away, often at extremely low cost. There's a cottage industry of small repair shops and DIY guides built entirely around keeping these things on the road. The brand and its manufacturing partners are large enough that spares will be around for years.
Razor has excellent brand recognition, but its electric scooter ecosystem in Europe is far thinner. You can usually find chargers, basic replacement parts and warranty support through big retailers, but you won't see the same wall of third-party upgrades or local specialists offering "Raven hinge rebuilds while you wait." For the target teen user that's probably fine-if it breaks badly, the realistic expectation is often "replace, not rebuild". For a serious commuter, that's not what you want to hear.
Pros & Cons Summary
| Xiaomi Pro 2 | Razor Raven |
|---|---|
Pros
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
Cons
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | Xiaomi Pro 2 | Razor Raven |
|---|---|---|
| Motor power (rated) | 300 W front hub | 170 W rear hub |
| Top speed | 25 km/h | 19 km/h |
| Theoretical range | 45 km | 17 km |
| Real-world range (approx.) | 25-35 km | 10-12 km |
| Battery capacity | 446 Wh | ≈ 187 Wh |
| Weight | 14,2 kg | 12,15 kg |
| Brakes | Front E-ABS + rear disc | Electronic + rear fender brake |
| Suspension | None (pneumatic tyres only) | None (front pneumatic, rear solid tyre) |
| Tyres | 8,5" pneumatic, both wheels | 10" pneumatic front, 6,7" solid rear |
| Max rider load | 100 kg | 70 kg |
| IP rating | IP54 | Not specified |
| Typical price | 642 € | 266 € |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
If you're an adult looking for a primary way to get to work, to the station, or across town, the Xiaomi Pro 2 is the only sensible choice between these two. It has the legs, the speed, the braking and the load capacity to function as real transport. Even with its ageing design and lack of suspension, it feels like a vehicle first and a gadget second-and that matters when you're riding in rain, dodging traffic and relying on it every day.
The Razor Raven is perfectly likeable within its narrow brief: light rider, mostly flat routes, relatively short distances, and a focus on fun over function. In that world it's a decent little machine with a nicer ride than many budget rivals, and it earns points for not pretending to be something it isn't. But stretch that brief-add hills, heavier riders, longer journeys-and its limits arrive alarmingly quickly.
So the choice is simple: if you want a grown-up scooter for grown-up tasks, go Xiaomi Pro 2 and accept the few quirks that come with it. If you're shopping for a teenager's first e-ride, or a cheap toy-plus-transport hybrid that won't regularly see more than a handful of kilometres at a time, the Raven can make sense. Just don't ask it to be a commuter-it was never built for that fight.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | Xiaomi Pro 2 | Razor Raven |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ❌ 1,44 €/Wh | ✅ 1,42 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ❌ 25,68 €/km/h | ✅ 14,00 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ✅ 31,84 g/Wh | ❌ 64,97 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | ✅ 0,57 kg/km/h | ❌ 0,64 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ✅ 21,40 €/km | ❌ 24,18 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ✅ 0,47 kg/km | ❌ 1,10 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ✅ 14,87 Wh/km | ❌ 17,00 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ✅ 12,00 W/km/h | ❌ 8,95 W/km/h |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | ✅ 0,0473 kg/W | ❌ 0,0715 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ✅ 52,47 W | ❌ 37,40 W |
These metrics answer different questions: cost metrics (per Wh, per km, per km/h) show how much you pay for energy, speed and range; weight metrics show how much scooter you lug around for the performance you get; efficiency shows how gently they sip from the battery; power ratios reveal which scooter has more muscle relative to its speed and mass; and average charging speed hints at how quickly each pack refills relative to its size.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | Xiaomi Pro 2 | Razor Raven |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ❌ Heavier to carry | ✅ Noticeably lighter |
| Range | ✅ Real commuting distance | ❌ Short, hop-only range |
| Max Speed | ✅ Legal urban pace | ❌ Slower, more toy-like |
| Power | ✅ Handles hills better | ❌ Struggles on inclines |
| Battery Size | ✅ Much larger capacity | ❌ Small, short-trip pack |
| Suspension | ❌ No suspension at all | ❌ Also no real suspension |
| Design | ✅ Clean, urban, minimalist | ❌ Looks budget, teen-focused |
| Safety | ✅ Better brakes, reflectors | ❌ Simpler, less comprehensive |
| Practicality | ✅ Daily commuter friendly | ❌ Limited to short errands |
| Comfort | ❌ Harsh on bad surfaces | ✅ Softer front ride feel |
| Features | ✅ App, KERS, cruise, display | ❌ Basic, fewer extras |
| Serviceability | ✅ Huge repair ecosystem | ❌ Limited parts channels |
| Customer Support | ✅ Strong retailer network | ✅ Big-box support presence |
| Fun Factor | ✅ Feels like "real vehicle" | ✅ Playful, easygoing fun |
| Build Quality | ✅ Refined, proven platform | ❌ More basic, cost-cutting |
| Component Quality | ✅ Better brakes, electronics | ❌ Cheaper running gear |
| Brand Name | ✅ Massive scooter footprint | ✅ Iconic, trusted with kids |
| Community | ✅ Huge, active mod scene | ❌ Small, more fragmented |
| Lights (visibility) | ✅ Front, rear, brake light | ❌ Headlight only, basic |
| Lights (illumination) | ✅ Better beam, road focus | ❌ Adequate, not great |
| Acceleration | ✅ Stronger off the line | ❌ Gentle, underpowered feel |
| Arrive with smile factor | ✅ Feels capable, confidence | ✅ Lighthearted, carefree vibe |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ✅ Predictable in city traffic | ❌ Range, hills cause worry |
| Charging speed (experience) | ❌ Long full recharge time | ✅ Shorter, easier top-ups |
| Reliability | ✅ Proven long-term durability | ❌ More unknown over years |
| Folded practicality | ❌ Wide bars when folded | ✅ Compact, easy to stash |
| Ease of transport | ❌ Heavier on stairs | ✅ Teens can carry easily |
| Handling | ✅ Stable at higher speed | ❌ Fine only at low speed |
| Braking performance | ✅ Strong, dual-system feel | ❌ Weaker, more basic |
| Riding position | ✅ Suits most adult heights | ❌ Optimised for smaller riders |
| Handlebar quality | ✅ Solid, decent grips | ❌ More budget feel |
| Throttle response | ✅ Smooth, well-modulated | ❌ Some report on/off feel |
| Dashboard/Display | ✅ Clear, integrated display | ❌ Very basic feedback |
| Security (locking) | ✅ App lock plus hardware | ❌ No integrated deterrents |
| Weather protection | ✅ Rated for light rain | ❌ Unclear, fair-weather only |
| Resale value | ✅ Strong second-hand demand | ❌ Lower demand, more niche |
| Tuning potential | ✅ Huge firmware, parts scene | ❌ Very limited options |
| Ease of maintenance | ❌ Tyres, hinge need effort | ✅ Simpler, fewer expectations |
| Value for Money | ✅ Better as true transport | ❌ Cheap, but compromised |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the XIAOMI Pro 2 scores 8 points against the RAZOR Raven's 2. In the Author's Category Battle, the XIAOMI Pro 2 gets 32 ✅ versus 10 ✅ for RAZOR Raven (with a few ties sprinkled in).
Totals: XIAOMI Pro 2 scores 40, RAZOR Raven scores 12.
Based on the scoring, the XIAOMI Pro 2 is our overall winner. Riding both back to back, the Xiaomi Pro 2 simply feels like the more complete partner in crime: it may not be thrilling, but it quietly gets almost everything important right, from real-world range to braking and everyday livability. The Razor Raven has its charms and a likeable, carefree character, but once you ask it to do more than short, flat fun runs, the illusion fades. If your scooter is going to carry you through traffic, weather and actual responsibility, the Xiaomi is the one you'll trust and grow with. The Raven belongs in the hands of someone younger, lighter and less demanding-and in that role, it's a decent sidekick, but never the star of the show.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.

